The use of energy and inorganic fertilisers have been identified as major contributors to the overall environmental impacts of algal value chains. This life cycle assessment (LCA) study compares three mitigation strategies aimed at reducing the environmental impacts of a novel European pilot scale Spirulina biorefinery and focusing on energy consumption, nutrient use, and transportation distances: (1) coupling algae cultivation with an anaerobic digestion and combined heat and power (AD-CHP) plant, (2) co-locating all biorefinery process stages, and (3) using photovoltaic (PV) panels to provide energy for biomass processing. While integrating the biorefinery with an AD-CHP plant initially appeared promising, the use of heat, electricity, and organic nitrogen led to increased climate change impacts and agricultural land occupation. This was primarily due to decreased Spirulina biomass productivity and the production of grass silage for co-digestion with cattle slurry. In contrast, the combined application of mitigation strategies (2) and (3), i.e. the co-location of all biorefinery processes and use of PV panels proved most effects, achieving 22% reduction in climate impacts. Solar energy use alone reduced climate impacts by 12% without shifting burdens to agricultural land occupation. The combined application of all strategies led to a 5% reduction in climate impacts. The sensitivity analysis highlighted the influence of the method used to handle multifunctionality on the LCA results. Overall, this study underscores the potential of integrating Spirulina biorefineries into a local bioeconomy and emphasises the significant role of renewable energy in reducing environmental impacts. These findings provide valuable insights to scale-up sustainable algae systems in Europe and advance the blue bioeconomy.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
