首页 > 最新文献

Animal Cognition最新文献

英文 中文
Do sheep (Ovis aries) discriminate human emotional odors? 绵羊(Ovis aries)能分辨人类的情感气味吗?
IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01895-1
Izïa Larrigaldie, Fabrice Damon, Solène Mousqué, Bruno Patris, Léa Lansade, Benoist Schaal, Alexandra Destrez

While sheep can detect and discriminate human emotions through visual and vocal cues, their reaction to human body odors remains unknown. The present study aimed to determine whether sheep (Ovis aries) can detect human odors, olfactorily discriminate stressed from non-stressed individuals, and behave accordingly based on the emotional valence of the odors. Axillary secretions from 34 students were collected following an oral examination (stress odor) or a regular class (non-stress odor). Fourteen female and 15 male lambs were then exposed to these odors through a habituation-dishabituation procedure. The habituation stimulus was presented four times for one minute, followed by the dishabituation stimulus presented once for one minute. Behavioral variables included spatiality relative to target odors, approach/withdrawal, ear positioning, sniffing, ingestion, and vocalization. Both female and male lambs more often positioned their ears backwards/forwards, and asymmetrically when exposed to the dishabituation stimulus, but regardless of their stress or non-stress value. They also changed their approach behavior when exposed to the dishabituation stimuli. Lambs displayed some behavioral signs of discrimination between the habituation and dishabituation odors, but regardless of their relation to stress or non-stress of human donors. In sum, this exploratory study suggests that young sheep respond negatively to the odor of unfamiliar humans, without showing any specific emotional contagion related to the stress odor. This exploratory study suggests young ovines can detect human body odor, a further step toward understanding the human-sheep relationship.

绵羊可以通过视觉和声音线索探测和分辨人类的情绪,但它们对人类体味的反应却仍然未知。本研究旨在确定绵羊(Ovis aries)是否能检测到人体气味,通过嗅觉区分压力和非压力个体,并根据气味的情绪价位做出相应的行为。在口试(压力气味)或正常上课(非压力气味)之后,收集了 34 名学生的腋窝分泌物。然后,14只雌性羔羊和15只雄性羔羊通过习惯化-去习惯化程序接触这些气味。习惯化刺激出现四次,持续一分钟,然后是去习惯化刺激出现一次,持续一分钟。行为变量包括相对于目标气味的空间感、接近/退出、耳朵定位、嗅探、摄食和发声。雌性和雄性羔羊在受到非栖息刺激时,都会更多地将耳朵朝后/朝前摆放,而且摆放的位置也不对称,但与它们的应激值或非应激值无关。当受到非应激刺激时,它们也会改变接近行为。羔羊表现出了一些辨别习惯性气味和非习惯性气味的行为迹象,但与人类供体的压力或非压力无关。总之,这项探索性研究表明,幼羊对陌生人类的气味会产生负面反应,但不会表现出与应激气味相关的任何特定情绪传染。这项探索性研究表明,幼绵羊能够察觉到人类的体味,这为了解人类与绵羊的关系又迈进了一步。
{"title":"Do sheep (Ovis aries) discriminate human emotional odors?","authors":"Izïa Larrigaldie, Fabrice Damon, Solène Mousqué, Bruno Patris, Léa Lansade, Benoist Schaal, Alexandra Destrez","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01895-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01895-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While sheep can detect and discriminate human emotions through visual and vocal cues, their reaction to human body odors remains unknown. The present study aimed to determine whether sheep (Ovis aries) can detect human odors, olfactorily discriminate stressed from non-stressed individuals, and behave accordingly based on the emotional valence of the odors. Axillary secretions from 34 students were collected following an oral examination (stress odor) or a regular class (non-stress odor). Fourteen female and 15 male lambs were then exposed to these odors through a habituation-dishabituation procedure. The habituation stimulus was presented four times for one minute, followed by the dishabituation stimulus presented once for one minute. Behavioral variables included spatiality relative to target odors, approach/withdrawal, ear positioning, sniffing, ingestion, and vocalization. Both female and male lambs more often positioned their ears backwards/forwards, and asymmetrically when exposed to the dishabituation stimulus, but regardless of their stress or non-stress value. They also changed their approach behavior when exposed to the dishabituation stimuli. Lambs displayed some behavioral signs of discrimination between the habituation and dishabituation odors, but regardless of their relation to stress or non-stress of human donors. In sum, this exploratory study suggests that young sheep respond negatively to the odor of unfamiliar humans, without showing any specific emotional contagion related to the stress odor. This exploratory study suggests young ovines can detect human body odor, a further step toward understanding the human-sheep relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282138/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141764895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reinforced colour preference of parasitoid wasps in the presence of floral scent: a case study of a cross-modal effect. 寄生蜂在花香中的强化颜色偏好:跨模态效应的案例研究。
IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01890-6
Soichi Kugimiya, Takeshi Shimoda, Junji Takabayashi

We examined the possibility of a cross-modal effect in naïve Cotesia vestalis, a parasitoid wasp of diamondback moth larvae, by using artificial flower models of four colours (blue, green, yellow, and red) in the absence or presence of floral scent collected from Brassica rapa inflorescences. In a four-choice test, regardless of the floral scent, non-starved female wasps visited green and yellow models significantly more often than blue and red ones, although no significant difference was observed between visits to the green and yellow models. They seldom visited blue and red models. When starved, the wasps became even more particular, visiting yellow significantly more frequently than green models, irrespective of the presence of the floral scent, indicating that they preferred to use yellow visual cues in their food search. Furthermore, a factorial analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of the interaction between model colour and floral scent on the wasps' visits to flower models. The floral scent induced starved and non-starved wasps to visit yellow and green models about twice as often as without the scent. A cross-modal effect of olfactory perception on the use of chromatic information by wasps may allow them to search efficiently for food sources.

我们使用四种颜色(蓝色、绿色、黄色和红色)的人造花模型,在没有或有从甘蓝菜花序中采集的花香的情况下,研究了天真雌蜂(Cotesia vestalis,一种寄生于钻石背蛾幼虫的小蜂)的跨模式效应的可能性。在四选一测试中,无论花香如何,非饥饿雌蜂访问绿色和黄色模型的次数明显多于访问蓝色和红色模型的次数,尽管在访问绿色和黄色模型之间没有观察到显著差异。它们很少光顾蓝色和红色模型。当饥饿时,黄蜂变得更加挑剔,无论是否有花香,它们访问黄色模型的频率都明显高于绿色模型,这表明它们在寻找食物时更喜欢使用黄色的视觉线索。此外,因子方差分析显示,模型颜色和花香的交互作用对黄蜂访问花朵模型有显著影响。花香诱导饥饿黄蜂和非饥饿黄蜂访问黄色和绿色模型的次数大约是没有花香时的两倍。嗅觉感知对黄蜂使用色度信息的跨模态影响可能使它们能够有效地寻找食物来源。
{"title":"Reinforced colour preference of parasitoid wasps in the presence of floral scent: a case study of a cross-modal effect.","authors":"Soichi Kugimiya, Takeshi Shimoda, Junji Takabayashi","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01890-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01890-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the possibility of a cross-modal effect in naïve Cotesia vestalis, a parasitoid wasp of diamondback moth larvae, by using artificial flower models of four colours (blue, green, yellow, and red) in the absence or presence of floral scent collected from Brassica rapa inflorescences. In a four-choice test, regardless of the floral scent, non-starved female wasps visited green and yellow models significantly more often than blue and red ones, although no significant difference was observed between visits to the green and yellow models. They seldom visited blue and red models. When starved, the wasps became even more particular, visiting yellow significantly more frequently than green models, irrespective of the presence of the floral scent, indicating that they preferred to use yellow visual cues in their food search. Furthermore, a factorial analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of the interaction between model colour and floral scent on the wasps' visits to flower models. The floral scent induced starved and non-starved wasps to visit yellow and green models about twice as often as without the scent. A cross-modal effect of olfactory perception on the use of chromatic information by wasps may allow them to search efficiently for food sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272690/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141756689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pictorial depth cues elicit the perception of tridimensionality in dogs. 图像深度线索引发狗的三维感知。
IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01887-1
Anna Broseghini, Markus Stasek, Miina Lõoke, Cécile Guérineau, Lieta Marinelli, Paolo Mongillo

The perception of tridimensionality is elicited by binocular disparity, motion parallax, and monocular or pictorial cues. The perception of tridimensionality arising from pictorial cues has been investigated in several non-human animal species. Although dogs can use and discriminate bidimensional images, to date there is no evidence of dogs' ability to perceive tridimensionality in pictures and/or through pictorial cues. The aim of the present study was to assess the perception of tridimensionality in dogs elicited by two pictorial cues: linear perspective and shading. Thirty-two dogs were presented with a tridimensional stimulus (i.e., a ball) rolling onto a planar surface until eventually falling into a hole (control condition) or until reaching and rolling over an illusory hole (test condition). The illusory hole corresponded to the bidimensional pictorial representation of the real hole, in which the pictorial cues of shading and linear perspective created the impression of tridimensionality. In a violation of expectation paradigm, dogs showed a longer looking time at the scene in which the unexpected situation of a ball rolling over an illusory hole occurred. The surprise reaction observed in the test condition suggests that the pictorial cues of shading and linear perspective in the bidimensional image of the hole were able to elicit the perception of tridimensionality in dogs.

三维感知是由双眼视差、运动视差、单眼或图像线索引起的。通过图像线索产生的三维感知已在多个非人类动物物种中进行了研究。虽然狗可以使用和辨别二维图像,但迄今为止还没有证据表明狗能够感知图片和/或通过图像线索感知三维性。本研究旨在评估狗通过线性透视和阴影这两种图像线索对三维性的感知能力。研究人员向 32 只狗展示了一个在平面上滚动的三维刺激物(即一个球),直到最终掉进一个洞里(对照组条件)或到达并滚过一个虚幻的洞(测试组条件)。虚幻的洞与真实洞的二维图像相对应,其中阴影和线性透视的图像线索给人三维的印象。在违反期望范式中,狗在出现球滚过一个虚幻洞这一意外情况的场景中表现出更长的注视时间。在测试条件下观察到的惊讶反应表明,洞的二维图像中的阴影和线性透视等图像线索能够引起狗的三维感知。
{"title":"Pictorial depth cues elicit the perception of tridimensionality in dogs.","authors":"Anna Broseghini, Markus Stasek, Miina Lõoke, Cécile Guérineau, Lieta Marinelli, Paolo Mongillo","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01887-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01887-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The perception of tridimensionality is elicited by binocular disparity, motion parallax, and monocular or pictorial cues. The perception of tridimensionality arising from pictorial cues has been investigated in several non-human animal species. Although dogs can use and discriminate bidimensional images, to date there is no evidence of dogs' ability to perceive tridimensionality in pictures and/or through pictorial cues. The aim of the present study was to assess the perception of tridimensionality in dogs elicited by two pictorial cues: linear perspective and shading. Thirty-two dogs were presented with a tridimensional stimulus (i.e., a ball) rolling onto a planar surface until eventually falling into a hole (control condition) or until reaching and rolling over an illusory hole (test condition). The illusory hole corresponded to the bidimensional pictorial representation of the real hole, in which the pictorial cues of shading and linear perspective created the impression of tridimensionality. In a violation of expectation paradigm, dogs showed a longer looking time at the scene in which the unexpected situation of a ball rolling over an illusory hole occurred. The surprise reaction observed in the test condition suggests that the pictorial cues of shading and linear perspective in the bidimensional image of the hole were able to elicit the perception of tridimensionality in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11263462/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141733400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive asymmetry in rats in response to emergent vs. disappearing affordances. 大鼠对出现与消失的可承受性的认知不对称。
IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01886-2
Wojciech Pisula, Klaudia Modlinska, Anna Chrzanowska, Katarzyna Goncikowska

This study examines the effects of novel environmental changes on the behavior of rats in an experimental chamber. We hypothesized that newly discovered opportunities, detected by the animal's cognitive system, would motivate greater investigation of environmental changes than comparable changes that prevent a given behavior. Three experiments differed in the emergence vs. elimination of affordances represented by open or closed tunnels. In Experiment 1, rats were habituated to a chamber with all four tunnels closed, and then two tunnels were opened. In Experiment 2, rats were habituated to a chamber where all four tunnels were open, and then two tunnels were closed. In Experiment 3, rats were habituated to a chamber with two open tunnels on one side, and two closed tunnels on the other. Then, the arrangement of open and closed tunnels was swapped. Results of the Exp. 1 show that the rats responded by spending more time near the newly opened tunnels and less time near the closed tunnels, the central zone, and the transporter. This suggests that rats are more motivated to investigate the environmental change combined with the emergent affordance (opening of the tunnels) than the environmental change alone. In Exp. 2, the rats responded by spending more time near the open tunnels and less time in the central zone. This suggests that the rats are more triggered by the available affordances (open tunnels) than by the environmental change (closed tunnels). Finally, in Exp. 3, the rats responded by spending more time near the newly opened tunnels and less near the central zone. However, they did not spend less time near the newly closed tunnels. These results suggest that rats process both the novelty itself and the emergence/disappearance of available affordances. The results are discussed regarding the cognitive asymmetry in the perception of emergent vs. disappearing affordances. It is proposed that the rat's cognitive system is specialized for detecting newly emergent environmental opportunities/affordances rather than novelty in general.

本研究探讨了新环境变化对实验箱中大鼠行为的影响。我们假设,与阻止特定行为的类似变化相比,由动物的认知系统检测到的新发现的机会会促使它们对环境变化进行更深入的研究。三项实验在开放或封闭隧道所代表的机会出现与消除方面存在差异。在实验 1 中,先让大鼠习惯于四个通道都关闭的密室,然后再打开两个通道。在实验 2 中,让大鼠习惯于四个通道都打开的密室,然后关闭两个通道。在实验 3 中,让大鼠习惯于一侧有两条开放隧道、另一侧有两条封闭隧道的密室。然后,将开放式隧道和封闭式隧道的排列互换。实验 1 的结果表明,大鼠在新开通的隧道附近逗留的时间较长,而在封闭隧道、中央区和传送器附近逗留的时间较短。这表明,与单独的环境变化相比,大鼠更有动力研究环境变化与新出现的可负担性(隧道开放)的结合。在实验 2 中,大鼠在开放的隧道附近逗留的时间更多,而在中央区逗留的时间较少。这表明,与环境变化(封闭的隧道)相比,大鼠更容易被现有的可获得性(开放的隧道)所触发。最后,在实验 3 中,大鼠的反应是在新开放的隧道附近花费更多时间,而在中央区花费较少时间。但是,它们在新关闭的隧道附近花费的时间并没有减少。这些结果表明,大鼠既会处理新奇事物本身,也会处理可用负担能力的出现/消失。本文讨论了大鼠在感知出现与消失的可负担性时的认知不对称问题。有人提出,大鼠的认知系统专门用于检测新出现的环境机会/负担能力,而不是一般的新奇事物。
{"title":"Cognitive asymmetry in rats in response to emergent vs. disappearing affordances.","authors":"Wojciech Pisula, Klaudia Modlinska, Anna Chrzanowska, Katarzyna Goncikowska","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01886-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01886-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the effects of novel environmental changes on the behavior of rats in an experimental chamber. We hypothesized that newly discovered opportunities, detected by the animal's cognitive system, would motivate greater investigation of environmental changes than comparable changes that prevent a given behavior. Three experiments differed in the emergence vs. elimination of affordances represented by open or closed tunnels. In Experiment 1, rats were habituated to a chamber with all four tunnels closed, and then two tunnels were opened. In Experiment 2, rats were habituated to a chamber where all four tunnels were open, and then two tunnels were closed. In Experiment 3, rats were habituated to a chamber with two open tunnels on one side, and two closed tunnels on the other. Then, the arrangement of open and closed tunnels was swapped. Results of the Exp. 1 show that the rats responded by spending more time near the newly opened tunnels and less time near the closed tunnels, the central zone, and the transporter. This suggests that rats are more motivated to investigate the environmental change combined with the emergent affordance (opening of the tunnels) than the environmental change alone. In Exp. 2, the rats responded by spending more time near the open tunnels and less time in the central zone. This suggests that the rats are more triggered by the available affordances (open tunnels) than by the environmental change (closed tunnels). Finally, in Exp. 3, the rats responded by spending more time near the newly opened tunnels and less near the central zone. However, they did not spend less time near the newly closed tunnels. These results suggest that rats process both the novelty itself and the emergence/disappearance of available affordances. The results are discussed regarding the cognitive asymmetry in the perception of emergent vs. disappearing affordances. It is proposed that the rat's cognitive system is specialized for detecting newly emergent environmental opportunities/affordances rather than novelty in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249404/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141615791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are comparable studies really comparable? Suggestions from a problem-solving experiment on urban and rural great tits. 可比研究真的具有可比性吗?城市和农村大山雀问题解决实验的建议。
IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01885-3
Ernő Vincze, Ineta Kačergytė, Juliane Gaviraghi Mussoi, Utku Urhan, Anders Brodin

Performance in tests of various cognitive abilities has often been compared, both within and between species. In intraspecific comparisons, habitat effects on cognition has been a popular topic, frequently with an underlying assumption that urban animals should perform better than their rural conspecifics. In this study, we tested problem-solving ability in great tits Parus major, in a string-pulling and a plug-opening test. Our aim was to compare performance between urban and rural great tits, and to compare their performance with previously published problem solving studies. Our great tits perfomed better in string-pulling than their conspecifics in previous studies (solving success: 54%), and better than their close relative, the mountain chickadee Poecile gambeli, in the plug-opening test (solving success: 70%). Solving latency became shorter over four repeated sessions, indicating learning abilities, and showed among-individual correlation between the two tests. However, the solving ability did not differ between habitat types in either test. Somewhat unexpectedly, we found marked differences between study years even though we tried to keep conditions identical. These were probably due to small changes to the experimental protocol between years, for example the unavoidable changes of observers and changes in the size and material of test devices. This has an important implication: if small changes in an otherwise identical set-up can have strong effects, meaningful comparisons of cognitive performance between different labs must be extremely hard. In a wider perspective this highlights the replicability problem often present in animal behaviour studies.

人们经常比较物种内部和物种之间在各种认知能力测试中的表现。在种内比较中,栖息地对认知能力的影响一直是一个热门话题,其基本假设往往是城市动物应该比农村同种动物表现得更好。在这项研究中,我们测试了大山雀(Parus major)在拉绳子和开塞子测试中解决问题的能力。我们的目的是比较城市大山雀和农村大山雀的表现,并将它们的表现与之前发表的问题解决研究进行比较。我们的大山雀在拉绳测试中的表现优于之前研究中的同种大山雀(解题成功率:54%),在开塞测试中的表现优于其近亲山地雏鸟Poecile gambeli(解题成功率:70%)。在重复进行的四次测试中,解谜潜伏期变得更短,这表明它们具有学习能力,而且两种测试之间存在个体间相关性。然而,在这两项测试中,不同生境类型的解题能力并无差异。有些出乎意料的是,尽管我们努力保持条件相同,我们还是发现了不同研究年份之间的明显差异。这可能是由于不同年份的实验方案发生了细微的变化,例如不可避免地更换了观察者,以及测试装置的尺寸和材料发生了变化。这就产生了一个重要的影响:如果一个完全相同的设置中的微小变化都会产生强烈的影响,那么对不同实验室之间的认知能力进行有意义的比较就一定会非常困难。从更广泛的角度来看,这也凸显了动物行为研究中经常出现的可复制性问题。
{"title":"Are comparable studies really comparable? Suggestions from a problem-solving experiment on urban and rural great tits.","authors":"Ernő Vincze, Ineta Kačergytė, Juliane Gaviraghi Mussoi, Utku Urhan, Anders Brodin","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01885-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01885-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Performance in tests of various cognitive abilities has often been compared, both within and between species. In intraspecific comparisons, habitat effects on cognition has been a popular topic, frequently with an underlying assumption that urban animals should perform better than their rural conspecifics. In this study, we tested problem-solving ability in great tits Parus major, in a string-pulling and a plug-opening test. Our aim was to compare performance between urban and rural great tits, and to compare their performance with previously published problem solving studies. Our great tits perfomed better in string-pulling than their conspecifics in previous studies (solving success: 54%), and better than their close relative, the mountain chickadee Poecile gambeli, in the plug-opening test (solving success: 70%). Solving latency became shorter over four repeated sessions, indicating learning abilities, and showed among-individual correlation between the two tests. However, the solving ability did not differ between habitat types in either test. Somewhat unexpectedly, we found marked differences between study years even though we tried to keep conditions identical. These were probably due to small changes to the experimental protocol between years, for example the unavoidable changes of observers and changes in the size and material of test devices. This has an important implication: if small changes in an otherwise identical set-up can have strong effects, meaningful comparisons of cognitive performance between different labs must be extremely hard. In a wider perspective this highlights the replicability problem often present in animal behaviour studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233327/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141557792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Synchronous citizen science with dogs. 与狗同步的公民科学。
IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01882-6
Madeline H Pelgrim, Zachary Tidd, Molly Byrne, Angie M Johnston, Daphna Buchsbaum

Citizen science approaches have grown in popularity over the years, partly due to their ability to reach a wider audience and produce more generalizable samples. In dogs, these studies, though, have been limited in their controls over materials or experimental protocols, with guardians typically reporting results without researcher supervision. Over two studies, we explored and validated a synchronous citizen science approach. We had dog guardians act as experimenters while being supervised by a researcher over Zoom. In study 1, we demonstrated that synchronous citizen science produced equivalent levels of performance to in-lab designs in a choice task. Consistent with past in-lab research, dogs selected a treat (vs. an empty plate) in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In study 2, we showed that Zoom methods are also appropriate for studies utilizing looking time measures. We explored dogs' looking behaviors when a bag of treats was placed in an unreachable location, and dogs' guardians were either attentive or inattentive while dogs attempted to retrieve the treats. Consistent with past work, dogs in the attentive condition looked at their guardian for longer periods and had a shorter latency to first look than dogs in the inattentive condition. Overall, we have demonstrated that synchronous citizen science studies with dogs are feasible and produce valid results consistent with those found in a typical lab setting.

多年来,公民科学方法越来越受欢迎,部分原因是它们能够接触到更广泛的受众并产生更具普遍性的样本。不过,这些研究对狗的材料或实验方案的控制有限,监护人通常在没有研究人员监督的情况下报告结果。在两项研究中,我们探索并验证了同步公民科学方法。我们让狗狗监护人担任实验员,同时由研究人员通过 Zoom 进行监督。在研究 1 中,我们证明了同步公民科学在选择任务中的表现与实验室内的设计水平相当。与过去的实验室内研究一致,狗在双项强制选择任务中选择了一种食物(与空盘子相比)。在研究 2 中,我们证明了中型放大法也适用于利用观察时间测量法进行的研究。我们探讨了当一袋点心被放置在狗无法触及的位置,而狗的监护人在狗试图取回点心时要么专注要么不专注的情况下狗的观察行为。与过去的研究结果一致,与注意力不集中的狗相比,注意力集中的狗看监护人的时间更长,第一次看的潜伏期更短。总之,我们已经证明,与狗进行同步公民科学研究是可行的,并且能产生与典型实验室环境下一致的有效结果。
{"title":"Synchronous citizen science with dogs.","authors":"Madeline H Pelgrim, Zachary Tidd, Molly Byrne, Angie M Johnston, Daphna Buchsbaum","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01882-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01882-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Citizen science approaches have grown in popularity over the years, partly due to their ability to reach a wider audience and produce more generalizable samples. In dogs, these studies, though, have been limited in their controls over materials or experimental protocols, with guardians typically reporting results without researcher supervision. Over two studies, we explored and validated a synchronous citizen science approach. We had dog guardians act as experimenters while being supervised by a researcher over Zoom. In study 1, we demonstrated that synchronous citizen science produced equivalent levels of performance to in-lab designs in a choice task. Consistent with past in-lab research, dogs selected a treat (vs. an empty plate) in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In study 2, we showed that Zoom methods are also appropriate for studies utilizing looking time measures. We explored dogs' looking behaviors when a bag of treats was placed in an unreachable location, and dogs' guardians were either attentive or inattentive while dogs attempted to retrieve the treats. Consistent with past work, dogs in the attentive condition looked at their guardian for longer periods and had a shorter latency to first look than dogs in the inattentive condition. Overall, we have demonstrated that synchronous citizen science studies with dogs are feasible and produce valid results consistent with those found in a typical lab setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226520/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141537441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing the productive vocabularies of grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) and young children. 比较灰鹦鹉(Psittacus erithacus)和幼儿的生产性词汇。
IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01883-5
Tereza Roubalová, Lucie Jarůšková, Kateřina Chládková, Jitka Lindová

Due to their outstanding ability of vocal imitation, parrots are often kept as pets. Research has shown that they do not just repeat human words. They can use words purposefully to label objects, persons, and animals, and they can even use conversational phrases in appropriate contexts. So far, the structure of pet parrots' vocabularies and the difference between them and human vocabulary acquisition has been studied only in one individual. This study quantitatively analyses parrot and child vocabularies in a larger sample using a vocabulary coding method suitable for assessing the vocabulary structure in both species. We have explored the composition of word-like sounds produced by 21 grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) kept as pets in Czech- or Slovak-speaking homes, and compared it to the composition of early productive vocabularies of 21 children acquiring Czech (aged 8-18 months), who were matched to the parrots by vocabulary size. The results show that the 'vocabularies' of talking grey parrots and children differ: children use significantly more object labels, activity and situation labels, and emotional expressions, while parrots produce significantly more conversational expressions, greetings, and multiword utterances in general. These differences could reflect a strong link between learning spoken words and understanding the underlying concepts, an ability seemingly unique to human children (and absent in parrots), but also different communicative goals of the two species.

由于鹦鹉具有出色的声音模仿能力,它们经常被当作宠物饲养。研究表明,鹦鹉不仅仅会重复人类的话。它们可以有目的地使用单词来标记物体、人和动物,甚至可以在适当的语境中使用会话短语。迄今为止,有关宠物鹦鹉词汇结构及其与人类词汇习得之间差异的研究仅针对一个个体。本研究采用适合评估两种鹦鹉词汇结构的词汇编码方法,对更大样本中的鹦鹉和儿童词汇进行了定量分析。我们研究了在捷克语或斯洛伐克语家庭中作为宠物饲养的 21 只灰鹦鹉(Psittacus erithacus)发出的类似单词的声音组成,并将其与 21 名学习捷克语的儿童(8-18 个月大)的早期生产性词汇组成进行了比较,这些儿童与鹦鹉的词汇量相匹配。结果表明,会说话的灰鹦鹉和儿童的 "词汇量 "不同:儿童使用的对象标签、活动和情境标签以及情绪表达明显较多,而鹦鹉使用的会话表达、问候语和多词口头禅明显较多。这些差异可能反映了学习口语和理解基本概念之间的紧密联系,这种能力似乎是人类儿童所独有的(而鹦鹉则不具备),同时也反映了两个物种不同的交际目标。
{"title":"Comparing the productive vocabularies of grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) and young children.","authors":"Tereza Roubalová, Lucie Jarůšková, Kateřina Chládková, Jitka Lindová","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01883-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01883-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to their outstanding ability of vocal imitation, parrots are often kept as pets. Research has shown that they do not just repeat human words. They can use words purposefully to label objects, persons, and animals, and they can even use conversational phrases in appropriate contexts. So far, the structure of pet parrots' vocabularies and the difference between them and human vocabulary acquisition has been studied only in one individual. This study quantitatively analyses parrot and child vocabularies in a larger sample using a vocabulary coding method suitable for assessing the vocabulary structure in both species. We have explored the composition of word-like sounds produced by 21 grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) kept as pets in Czech- or Slovak-speaking homes, and compared it to the composition of early productive vocabularies of 21 children acquiring Czech (aged 8-18 months), who were matched to the parrots by vocabulary size. The results show that the 'vocabularies' of talking grey parrots and children differ: children use significantly more object labels, activity and situation labels, and emotional expressions, while parrots produce significantly more conversational expressions, greetings, and multiword utterances in general. These differences could reflect a strong link between learning spoken words and understanding the underlying concepts, an ability seemingly unique to human children (and absent in parrots), but also different communicative goals of the two species.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196360/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
This or not that: select and reject control of relational responding in rats using a blank comparison procedure with odor stimuli. 是这样还是那样:利用气味刺激的空白对照程序控制大鼠关系反应的选择和拒绝。
IF 2.7 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01881-7
Bobbie Faith Wolff, Mark Galizio, Katherine Bruce

The blank comparison (BLC) task was developed to assess stimulus relations in discrimination learning; that is, are subjects learning to "select" the correct stimulus (S+) or "reject" the incorrect stimulus (S-) or both? This task has been used to study exclusion learning, mostly in humans and monkeys, and the present study extends the procedure to rats. The BLC task uses an ambiguous stimulus (BLC+/-) that replaces S+ (in the presence of S-) and replaces S- (in the presence of S+). In the current experiment, four rats were trained to remove session-novel scented lids from sand-filled cups in a two-choice, simultaneous presentation procedure called the Odor Span Task (OST) before being trained on the BLC procedure using odors as the discriminative stimuli. The BLC training procedure utilized simple discrimination training (S+ and S-) and added select (S+ and BLC-) and reject (BLC+ and S-) trial types. All rats demonstrated accurate performance in sessions with both select and reject type trials. Next, BLC probe trials were interspersed in standard OST sessions to assess the form of stimulus control in the OST. Rats performed accurately on select type probe trials (similar to baseline OST performance) and also showed above chance accuracy on reject type trials. Thus, we demonstrated that rats could acquire an odor-based version of the BLC task and that both select and exclusion-based (reject) relations were active in the OST. The finding of exclusion in rats under the rigorous BLC task conditions confirms that exclusion-based responding is not limited to humans and non-human primates.

空白比较(BLC)任务是为了评估辨别学习中的刺激关系而开发的;也就是说,受试者是在学习 "选择 "正确的刺激(S+)还是 "拒绝 "不正确的刺激(S-),或者两者兼而有之?这项任务已被用于研究排除学习,主要是在人类和猴子身上,本研究将这一程序扩展到了大鼠身上。BLC任务使用一种模棱两可的刺激物(BLC+/-),在S-存在的情况下取代S+,在S+存在的情况下取代S-。在本实验中,四只大鼠先接受了从装满沙子的杯子中取出会话新香味盖子的训练,该训练采用的是双选、同时呈现的程序,即气味跨度任务(OST),然后再接受以气味作为辨别刺激的 BLC 程序训练。BLC 训练程序利用了简单的辨别训练(S+ 和 S-),并增加了选择(S+ 和 BLC-)和拒绝(BLC+ 和 S-)试验类型。所有大鼠在选择和拒绝两种类型的试验中都表现出了准确的表现。接下来,在标准的 OST 训练中穿插了 BLC 探究试验,以评估 OST 中的刺激控制形式。大鼠在选择类型的探究试验中表现准确(与基线 OST 表现相似),在拒绝类型的试验中也表现出高于概率的准确性。因此,我们证明了大鼠可以获得基于气味的 BLC 任务版本,并且选择和排除(拒绝)关系在 OST 中都很活跃。在严格的 BLC 任务条件下发现大鼠的排斥反应证实了排斥反应并不局限于人类和非人灵长类动物。
{"title":"This or not that: select and reject control of relational responding in rats using a blank comparison procedure with odor stimuli.","authors":"Bobbie Faith Wolff, Mark Galizio, Katherine Bruce","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01881-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01881-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The blank comparison (BLC) task was developed to assess stimulus relations in discrimination learning; that is, are subjects learning to \"select\" the correct stimulus (S+) or \"reject\" the incorrect stimulus (S-) or both? This task has been used to study exclusion learning, mostly in humans and monkeys, and the present study extends the procedure to rats. The BLC task uses an ambiguous stimulus (BLC+/-) that replaces S+ (in the presence of S-) and replaces S- (in the presence of S+). In the current experiment, four rats were trained to remove session-novel scented lids from sand-filled cups in a two-choice, simultaneous presentation procedure called the Odor Span Task (OST) before being trained on the BLC procedure using odors as the discriminative stimuli. The BLC training procedure utilized simple discrimination training (S+ and S-) and added select (S+ and BLC-) and reject (BLC+ and S-) trial types. All rats demonstrated accurate performance in sessions with both select and reject type trials. Next, BLC probe trials were interspersed in standard OST sessions to assess the form of stimulus control in the OST. Rats performed accurately on select type probe trials (similar to baseline OST performance) and also showed above chance accuracy on reject type trials. Thus, we demonstrated that rats could acquire an odor-based version of the BLC task and that both select and exclusion-based (reject) relations were active in the OST. The finding of exclusion in rats under the rigorous BLC task conditions confirms that exclusion-based responding is not limited to humans and non-human primates.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182792/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141330317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Replay of incidentally encoded novel odors in the rat. 大鼠重放偶然编码的新气味
IF 2.7 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01880-8
Cassandra L Sheridan, Lauren Bonner, Jonathon D Crystal

Although events are not always known to be important when they occur, people can remember details about such incidentally encoded information using episodic memory. Sheridan et al. (2024) argued that rats replayed episodic memories of incidentally encoded information in an unexpected assessment of memory. In one task, rats reported the third-last item in an explicitly encoded list of trial-unique odors. In a second task, rats foraged in a radial maze in the absence of odors. On a critical test, rats foraged in the maze, but scented lids covered the food. Next, memory of the third-last odor was assessed. The rats correctly answered the unexpected question. Because the odors used in the critical test were the same as those used during training, automatically encoding odors for the purpose of taking an upcoming test of memory (stimulus generalization) may have been encouraged. Here, we provided an opportunity for incidental encoding of novel odors. Previously trained rats foraged in the radial maze with entirely novel odors covering the food. Next, memory of the third-last odor was assessed. The rats correctly answered the unexpected question. High accuracy when confronted with novel odors provides evidence that the rats did not automatically encode odors for the purpose of taking an upcoming test, ruling out stimulus generalization. We conclude that rats encode multiple pieces of putatively unimportant information, and later replayed a stream of novel episodic memories when that information was needed to solve an unexpected problem.

尽管事件发生时人们并不总是知道其重要性,但人们可以利用外显记忆记住这些偶然编码信息的细节。Sheridan 等人(2024 年)认为,在一项意想不到的记忆评估中,大鼠重放了偶然编码信息的外显记忆。在一项任务中,大鼠报告了明确编码的试验独特气味列表中的倒数第三项。在第二项任务中,大鼠在没有气味的情况下在径向迷宫中觅食。在一项关键测试中,大鼠在迷宫中觅食,但有气味的盖子盖住了食物。接下来,对倒数第三种气味的记忆进行评估。大鼠正确回答了出乎意料的问题。由于临界测试中使用的气味与训练中使用的气味相同,因此可能会鼓励大鼠为即将进行的记忆测试自动编码气味(刺激泛化)。在这里,我们提供了一个偶然编码新气味的机会。之前受过训练的大鼠在径向迷宫中觅食,食物上覆盖着完全陌生的气味。接下来,对倒数第三种气味的记忆进行评估。大鼠正确回答了出乎意料的问题。大鼠在面对新气味时的高准确率证明,大鼠并不是为了参加即将到来的测试而自动对气味进行编码,从而排除了刺激泛化的可能性。我们的结论是,大鼠会对多个可能并不重要的信息进行编码,然后在需要这些信息来解决意外问题时重放新奇的记忆流。
{"title":"Replay of incidentally encoded novel odors in the rat.","authors":"Cassandra L Sheridan, Lauren Bonner, Jonathon D Crystal","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01880-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01880-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although events are not always known to be important when they occur, people can remember details about such incidentally encoded information using episodic memory. Sheridan et al. (2024) argued that rats replayed episodic memories of incidentally encoded information in an unexpected assessment of memory. In one task, rats reported the third-last item in an explicitly encoded list of trial-unique odors. In a second task, rats foraged in a radial maze in the absence of odors. On a critical test, rats foraged in the maze, but scented lids covered the food. Next, memory of the third-last odor was assessed. The rats correctly answered the unexpected question. Because the odors used in the critical test were the same as those used during training, automatically encoding odors for the purpose of taking an upcoming test of memory (stimulus generalization) may have been encouraged. Here, we provided an opportunity for incidental encoding of novel odors. Previously trained rats foraged in the radial maze with entirely novel odors covering the food. Next, memory of the third-last odor was assessed. The rats correctly answered the unexpected question. High accuracy when confronted with novel odors provides evidence that the rats did not automatically encode odors for the purpose of taking an upcoming test, ruling out stimulus generalization. We conclude that rats encode multiple pieces of putatively unimportant information, and later replayed a stream of novel episodic memories when that information was needed to solve an unexpected problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178560/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141316544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are lateralized and bold fish optimistic or pessimistic? 侧向大胆的鱼是乐观还是悲观?
IF 2.7 2区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01876-4
F Berlinghieri, G Rizzuto, L Kruizinga, B Riedstra, Tgg Groothuis, C Brown

Cognitive bias is defined as the influence of emotions on cognitive processes. The concept of the cognitive judgement bias has its origins in human psychology but has been applied to animals over the past 2 decades. In this study we were interested in determining if laterality and personality traits, which are known to influence learning style, might also be correlated with a cognitive bias in the three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). We used the judgement bias test with the go/no-go procedure where fish were first trained to discriminate between a black and white card and, after reaching a minimum learning criterion, tested their response to an ambiguous card (grey). Optimistic subjects were expected to have a high expectation of reward associated with an ambiguous stimulus, whereas pessimistic subjects a high expectation of non-reward. We used an emergence and a mirror test to quantify boldness and laterality, respectively. We hypothesised that male, bolder and more strongly lateralized fish would be more optimistic than female, shy and less strongly lateralised fish. We found that males and more strongly lateralized fish were more optimistic than females and less strongly lateralized fish. In addition, bold males were more optimistic than shy males as we predicted, but females showed the opposite pattern. Finally, fish trained on the black colour card learned the training task faster than those trained on a white card. Our results indicate that both laterality and personality traits are linked to animals' internal states (pessimistic or optimistic outlooks) which likely has broad implications for understanding animal behaviour particularly in a welfare context.

认知偏差是指情绪对认知过程的影响。认知判断偏差的概念起源于人类心理学,但在过去二十年中已被应用到动物身上。在这项研究中,我们想确定侧向性和人格特质(已知会影响学习风格)是否也会与三刺粘鸟(Gasterosteus aculeatus)的认知偏差相关。我们使用了判断偏差测试和 "去/不去 "程序,首先训练鱼类辨别黑白卡片,在达到最低学习标准后,测试它们对模糊卡片(灰色)的反应。乐观的受试者会对模棱两可的刺激产生较高的奖励预期,而悲观的受试者则会对无奖励产生较高的预期。我们使用出现测试和镜像测试来分别量化胆量和侧向性。我们假设雄性、大胆和侧向性更强的鱼会比雌性、害羞和侧向性不强的鱼更乐观。我们发现,雄鱼和侧向性较强的鱼比雌鱼和侧向性较弱的鱼更乐观。此外,正如我们所预测的那样,大胆的雄鱼比害羞的雄鱼更乐观,但雌鱼却表现出相反的模式。最后,接受黑色色卡训练的鱼比接受白色色卡训练的鱼更快学会训练任务。我们的研究结果表明,侧向性和个性特征都与动物的内部状态(悲观或乐观的前景)有关,这可能对理解动物行为,特别是福利方面的行为有广泛的影响。
{"title":"Are lateralized and bold fish optimistic or pessimistic?","authors":"F Berlinghieri, G Rizzuto, L Kruizinga, B Riedstra, Tgg Groothuis, C Brown","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01876-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10071-024-01876-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive bias is defined as the influence of emotions on cognitive processes. The concept of the cognitive judgement bias has its origins in human psychology but has been applied to animals over the past 2 decades. In this study we were interested in determining if laterality and personality traits, which are known to influence learning style, might also be correlated with a cognitive bias in the three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). We used the judgement bias test with the go/no-go procedure where fish were first trained to discriminate between a black and white card and, after reaching a minimum learning criterion, tested their response to an ambiguous card (grey). Optimistic subjects were expected to have a high expectation of reward associated with an ambiguous stimulus, whereas pessimistic subjects a high expectation of non-reward. We used an emergence and a mirror test to quantify boldness and laterality, respectively. We hypothesised that male, bolder and more strongly lateralized fish would be more optimistic than female, shy and less strongly lateralised fish. We found that males and more strongly lateralized fish were more optimistic than females and less strongly lateralized fish. In addition, bold males were more optimistic than shy males as we predicted, but females showed the opposite pattern. Finally, fish trained on the black colour card learned the training task faster than those trained on a white card. Our results indicate that both laterality and personality traits are linked to animals' internal states (pessimistic or optimistic outlooks) which likely has broad implications for understanding animal behaviour particularly in a welfare context.</p>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11150292/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141236261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Animal Cognition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1