首页 > 最新文献

Language and cognitive processes最新文献

英文 中文
The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives 工作记忆在反身性加工中的作用
Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.548391
Ian Cunnings, C. Felser
We report results from two eye-movement experiments that examined how differences in working memory (WM) capacity affect readers' application of structural constraints on reflexive anaphor resolution during sentence comprehension. We examined whether binding Principle A, a syntactic constraint on the interpretation of reflexives, is reducible to a memory friendly “recency” strategy, and whether WM capacity influences the degree to which readers create anaphoric dependencies ruled out by binding theory. Our results indicate that low and high WM span readers applied Principle A early during processing. However, contrary to previous findings, low span readers also showed immediate intrusion effects of a linearly closer but structurally inaccessible competitor antecedent. We interpret these findings as indicating that although the relative prominence of potential antecedents in WM can affect online anaphor resolution, Principle A is not reducible to a processing or linear distance based “least effort” constraint.
我们报告了两个眼动实验的结果,研究了工作记忆(WM)容量的差异如何影响读者在句子理解过程中对反身指解决的结构约束的应用。我们研究了约束原则A(一种对自反解释的句法约束)是否可简化为记忆友好的“近因”策略,以及WM能力是否影响读者产生被约束理论排除的回指依赖的程度。我们的研究结果表明,低和高WM广度的读者在加工过程中较早地应用了原则A。然而,与先前的研究结果相反,低广度读者也表现出线性接近但结构上不可接近的竞争前词的直接入侵效应。我们将这些研究结果解释为,尽管WM中潜在先行词的相对显著性会影响在线隐喻的解析,但原则A不能简化为基于加工或线性距离的“最省力”约束。
{"title":"The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives","authors":"Ian Cunnings, C. Felser","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.548391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.548391","url":null,"abstract":"We report results from two eye-movement experiments that examined how differences in working memory (WM) capacity affect readers' application of structural constraints on reflexive anaphor resolution during sentence comprehension. We examined whether binding Principle A, a syntactic constraint on the interpretation of reflexives, is reducible to a memory friendly “recency” strategy, and whether WM capacity influences the degree to which readers create anaphoric dependencies ruled out by binding theory. Our results indicate that low and high WM span readers applied Principle A early during processing. However, contrary to previous findings, low span readers also showed immediate intrusion effects of a linearly closer but structurally inaccessible competitor antecedent. We interpret these findings as indicating that although the relative prominence of potential antecedents in WM can affect online anaphor resolution, Principle A is not reducible to a processing or linear distance based “least effort” constraint.","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2010.548391","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59134816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75
Introduction: Formal vs. processing explanations of linguistic phenomena 语言现象的形式解释与加工解释
Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.718087
H. Goodluck, E. Zweig
We summarise some of the factors affecting decisions about the status of syntactic phenomena: pragmatics, linguistic processing capacity, extra-linguistic computation, and methodology. We conclude that although there are clear-cut cases for which the decision to assign a phenomenon to processing or to irreducible syntactic principles is simple, there are many instances in which the decision is contentious.
我们总结了影响句法现象地位决定的一些因素:语用学、语言处理能力、语言外计算和方法。我们得出的结论是,尽管在明确的情况下,决定将一种现象分配给处理或不可约的句法原则是简单的,但在许多情况下,该决定是有争议的。
{"title":"Introduction: Formal vs. processing explanations of linguistic phenomena","authors":"H. Goodluck, E. Zweig","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2012.718087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.718087","url":null,"abstract":"We summarise some of the factors affecting decisions about the status of syntactic phenomena: pragmatics, linguistic processing capacity, extra-linguistic computation, and methodology. We conclude that although there are clear-cut cases for which the decision to assign a phenomenon to processing or to irreducible syntactic principles is simple, there are many instances in which the decision is contentious.","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2012.718087","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59135835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Processing VP-ellipsis and VP-anaphora with structurally parallel and nonparallel antecedents: An eye-tracking study 结构平行和非平行先行词对副省略和副回指的处理:眼动追踪研究
Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.676190
L. Roberts, A. Matsuo, N. Duffield
In this paper, we report on an eye-tracking study investigating the processing of English VP-ellipsis (John took the rubbish out. Fred did [] too) (VPE) and VP-anaphora (John took the rubbish out. Fred did it too) (VPA) constructions, with syntactically parallel versus nonparallel antecedent clauses (e.g., The rubbish was taken out by John. Fred did [] too/Fred did it too). The results show first that VPE involves greater processing costs than VPA overall. Second, although the structural nonparallelism of the antecedent clause elicited a processing cost for both anaphor types, there was a difference in the timing and the strength of this parallelism effect: it was earlier and more fleeting for VPA, as evidenced by regression path times, whereas the effect occurred later with VPE completions, showing up in second and total fixation times measures, and continuing on into the reading of the adjacent text. Taking the observed differences between the processing of the two anaphor types together with other research findings in the literature, we argue that our data support the idea that in the case of VPE, the VP from the antecedent clause necessitates more computation at the elision site before it is linked to its antecedent than is the case for VPA.
本文报道了一项关于英语vp -省略句(John took the rubbish out)加工过程的眼动研究。弗雷德也这样做了(VPE)和副总统(约翰把垃圾拿出去了)。弗雷德也这样做过)(VPA)结构,具有语法上平行和非平行的先行句(例如,垃圾被约翰拿走了。Fred did [] too/Fred也做了。结果首先表明,VPE涉及的处理成本比VPA总体上要高。其次,虽然先行句的结构不平行性会引起两种类型的照应的处理成本,但这种平行效应的时间和强度是不同的:VPA的处理成本更早,更短暂,正如回归路径时间所证明的那样,而VPE补全的影响发生得更晚,表现在秒和总注视时间测量中,并持续到相邻文本的阅读中。结合观察到的两种暗指类型处理之间的差异以及文献中的其他研究结果,我们认为我们的数据支持这样一种观点,即在VPE的情况下,来自先行句的VP在与其先行词相关联之前需要在省略位点进行更多的计算,而不是VPA。
{"title":"Processing VP-ellipsis and VP-anaphora with structurally parallel and nonparallel antecedents: An eye-tracking study","authors":"L. Roberts, A. Matsuo, N. Duffield","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2012.676190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.676190","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we report on an eye-tracking study investigating the processing of English VP-ellipsis (John took the rubbish out. Fred did [] too) (VPE) and VP-anaphora (John took the rubbish out. Fred did it too) (VPA) constructions, with syntactically parallel versus nonparallel antecedent clauses (e.g., The rubbish was taken out by John. Fred did [] too/Fred did it too). The results show first that VPE involves greater processing costs than VPA overall. Second, although the structural nonparallelism of the antecedent clause elicited a processing cost for both anaphor types, there was a difference in the timing and the strength of this parallelism effect: it was earlier and more fleeting for VPA, as evidenced by regression path times, whereas the effect occurred later with VPE completions, showing up in second and total fixation times measures, and continuing on into the reading of the adjacent text. Taking the observed differences between the processing of the two anaphor types together with other research findings in the literature, we argue that our data support the idea that in the case of VPE, the VP from the antecedent clause necessitates more computation at the elision site before it is linked to its antecedent than is the case for VPA.","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2012.676190","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59135849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Semantically- and Phonologically-Related Primes Improve Name Retrieval in Young and Older Adults. 语义和语音相关启动词改善年轻人和老年人的名字检索。
Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.685481
Shalyn Oberle, Lori E James

Word and name retrieval failures increase with age, and this study investigated how priming impacts young and older adults' ability to produce proper names. The transmission deficit hypothesis predicts facilitation from related prime names, whereas the blocking and inhibition deficit hypotheses predict interference from related names, especially for older adults. On half of our experimental trials, we exposed participants to a prime name that is phonologically- and semantically-related to a target name. Related names facilitated production of targets overall, with older adults' naming ability improved at least as much as young adults'. Results are contrary to predictions of the blocking and inhibitory deficit hypotheses, and suggest that an activation-based model of memory and language better accounts for retrieval and production of well-known names.

单词和名字检索失败随着年龄的增长而增加,本研究调查了启动如何影响年轻人和老年人产生专有名称的能力。传导缺陷假说预测相关启动名的促进作用,而阻断和抑制缺陷假说预测相关名称的干扰作用,尤其是对老年人。在一半的实验中,我们让参与者接触到一个在语音和语义上与目标名字相关的启动名字。总体而言,相关的名字促进了目标的产生,老年人的命名能力提高至少与年轻人一样多。结果与阻断和抑制缺陷假说的预测相反,并表明基于激活的记忆和语言模型更好地解释了众所周知的名字的检索和产生。
{"title":"Semantically- and Phonologically-Related Primes Improve Name Retrieval in Young and Older Adults.","authors":"Shalyn Oberle,&nbsp;Lori E James","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2012.685481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.685481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Word and name retrieval failures increase with age, and this study investigated how priming impacts young and older adults' ability to produce proper names. The transmission deficit hypothesis predicts facilitation from related prime names, whereas the blocking and inhibition deficit hypotheses predict interference from related names, especially for older adults. On half of our experimental trials, we exposed participants to a prime name that is phonologically- and semantically-related to a target name. Related names facilitated production of targets overall, with older adults' naming ability improved at least as much as young adults'. Results are contrary to predictions of the blocking and inhibitory deficit hypotheses, and suggest that an activation-based model of memory and language better accounts for retrieval and production of well-known names.</p>","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2012.685481","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31831365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach. 玫瑰不管叫什么名字都是玫瑰:这是对汉奇和Mädebach的重新诠释。
Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-08-28 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.682071
Eduardo Navarrete, Bradford Z Mahon

The Response Exclusion Hypothesis localises the semantic interference effect as observed in the picture-word paradigm at a postlexical level of processing. An important aspect of this proposal is that the ease with which distractor words can be excluded from production at the response level is determined by the degree to which they satisfy criteria demanded of a correct response. This proposal predicts that naming a picture of a "rose" with the response "flower" will be slower with the distractor "rose" than a distractor word that would not be appropriate for the picture (e.g., "tulip"). Hantsch and Mädebach report evidence consistent with this expectation; however, the authors argue that the results are problematic for the Response Exclusion Hypothesis. Here we unpack Hantsch and Mädebach's arguments about why their finding is (putatively) problematic for the Response Exclusion Hypothesis. We conclude that the pattern of effects that the authors report are not only in line with what would be expected by the Response Exclusion Hypothesis, but are difficult to reconcile with Hantsch and Mädebach's preferred theoretical position.

反应排斥假说将图词范式中的语义干扰效应定位于词汇后加工水平。该建议的一个重要方面是,在反应水平上排除干扰词的难易程度取决于它们满足正确反应所需标准的程度。这个提议预测,用“花”来命名一张“玫瑰”的图片,用“玫瑰”来命名的反应会比用一个不适合这张照片的分心词(比如“郁金香”)慢。Hantsch和Mädebach报告的证据与这一预期一致;然而,作者认为,结果是有问题的反应排斥假说。在这里,我们剖析了Hantsch和Mädebach关于为什么他们的发现(假定地)对反应排除假说有问题的论点。我们的结论是,作者报告的效应模式不仅符合反应排斥假说的预期,而且很难与Hantsch和Mädebach的首选理论立场相一致。
{"title":"A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach.","authors":"Eduardo Navarrete,&nbsp;Bradford Z Mahon","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2012.682071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.682071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Response Exclusion Hypothesis localises the semantic interference effect as observed in the picture-word paradigm at a postlexical level of processing. An important aspect of this proposal is that the ease with which distractor words can be excluded from production at the response level is determined by the degree to which they satisfy criteria demanded of a correct response. This proposal predicts that naming a picture of a \"rose\" with the response \"flower\" will be slower with the distractor \"rose\" than a distractor word that would not be appropriate for the picture (e.g., \"tulip\"). Hantsch and Mädebach report evidence consistent with this expectation; however, the authors argue that the results are problematic for the Response Exclusion Hypothesis. Here we unpack Hantsch and Mädebach's arguments about why their finding is (putatively) problematic for the Response Exclusion Hypothesis. We conclude that the pattern of effects that the authors report are not only in line with what would be expected by the Response Exclusion Hypothesis, but are difficult to reconcile with Hantsch and Mädebach's preferred theoretical position.</p>","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2012.682071","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35130409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
The neural substrates of complex argument structure representations: Processing 'alternating transitivity' verbs. 复杂论点结构表征的神经基础:对“交替及物性”动词的处理。
Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.672754
Aya Meltzer-Asscher, Julia Schuchard, Dirk-Bart den Ouden, Cynthia K Thompson

This study examines the neural correlates of processing verbal entries with multiple argument structures using fMRI. We compared brain activation in response to 'alternating transitivity' verbs, corresponding to two different verbal alternates - one transitive and one intransitive - and simple verbs, with only one, intransitive, thematic grid. Fourteen young healthy participants performed a lexical decision task with the two verb types. Results showed significantly greater activation in the angular and supramarginal gyri (BAs 39 and 40) extending to the posterior superior and middle temporal gyri bilaterally, for alternating compared to simple verbs. Additional activation was detected in bilateral middle and superior frontal gyri (BAs 8 and 9). The opposite contrast, simple compared to alternating verbs, showed no significant differential activation in any regions of the brain. These findings are consistent with previous studies implicating a posterior network including the superior temporal, supramarginal and angular gyri for processing verbs with multiple thematic roles, as well as with those suggesting involvement of the middle and superior frontal gyri in lexical ambiguity processing. However, because 'alternating transitivity' verbs differ from simple intransitives with regard to both the number of thematic grids (two vs. one) and the number of thematic roles (two vs. one), our findings do not distinguish between activations associated with these two differences.

本研究利用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究了处理具有多重论点结构的言语条目的神经关联。我们比较了大脑对“交替及物性”动词的反应,这些动词对应于两种不同的动词交替——一个及物动词和一个不及物动词——以及只有一个不及物动词的简单动词。14名年轻的健康参与者用这两种动词类型进行词汇决策任务。结果显示,与简单动词相比,交替动词在双侧的角回和边缘上回(ba39和ba40)明显更大的激活,延伸到颞后上回和中回。在双侧额上回(ba8和ba9)检测到额外的激活。与交替动词相比,相反的对比显示,在大脑的任何区域都没有明显的激活差异。这些发现与先前的研究结果一致,即包括颞上回、边缘上回和角回在内的后网络参与处理具有多个主题角色的动词,以及额上回和中上回参与词汇歧义处理。然而,由于“交替及物性”动词与简单不及物动词在主格数量(两个vs一个)和主格角色数量(两个vs一个)上都有所不同,我们的研究结果并没有区分与这两种差异相关的激活。
{"title":"The neural substrates of complex argument structure representations: Processing 'alternating transitivity' verbs.","authors":"Aya Meltzer-Asscher,&nbsp;Julia Schuchard,&nbsp;Dirk-Bart den Ouden,&nbsp;Cynthia K Thompson","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2012.672754","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.672754","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the neural correlates of processing verbal entries with multiple argument structures using fMRI. We compared brain activation in response to 'alternating transitivity' verbs, corresponding to two different verbal alternates - one transitive and one intransitive - and simple verbs, with only one, intransitive, thematic grid. Fourteen young healthy participants performed a lexical decision task with the two verb types. Results showed significantly greater activation in the angular and supramarginal gyri (BAs 39 and 40) extending to the posterior superior and middle temporal gyri bilaterally, for alternating compared to simple verbs. Additional activation was detected in bilateral middle and superior frontal gyri (BAs 8 and 9). The opposite contrast, simple compared to alternating verbs, showed no significant differential activation in any regions of the brain. These findings are consistent with previous studies implicating a posterior network including the superior temporal, supramarginal and angular gyri for processing verbs with multiple thematic roles, as well as with those suggesting involvement of the middle and superior frontal gyri in lexical ambiguity processing. However, because 'alternating transitivity' verbs differ from simple intransitives with regard to both the number of thematic grids (two vs. one) and the number of thematic roles (two vs. one), our findings do not distinguish between activations associated with these two differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2012.672754","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34259544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41
The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research 在语法和语义研究中需要定量方法
Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.515080
E. Gibson, Evelina Fedorenko, Diogo Almeida, Leon Bergen, Joan Bresnan, David Caplan, Nick Chater, Morten H. Christiansen, Mike Frank, Adele Goldberg, Helen Goodluck, Greg Hickok, Ray Jackendoff, N. Kanwisher, R. Levy, Maryellen Macdonald, James Myers, Colin Phillips, Steven Piantadosi, Steve Pinker, D. Poeppel, Omer Preminger, Ian Roberts, Greg Scontras, Jon Sprouse, Carson Schü, Mike Tanenhaus, Vince Walsh, Duane Watson, E. Zweig
The prevalent method in syntax and semantics research involves obtaining a judgement of the acceptability of a sentence/meaning pair, typically by just the author of the paper, sometimes with feedback from colleagues. This methodology does not allow proper testing of scientific hypotheses because of (a) the small number of experimental participants (typically one); (b) the small number of experimental stimuli (typically one); (c) cognitive biases on the part of the researcher and participants; and (d) the effect of the preceding context (e.g., other constructions the researcher may have been recently considering). In the current paper we respond to some arguments that have been given in support of continuing to use the traditional nonquantitative method in syntax/semantics research. One recent defence of the traditional method comes from Phillips (2009), who argues that no harm has come from the nonquantitative approach in syntax research thus far. Phillips argues that there are no cases in the literature where an incorrect intuitive judgement has become the basis for a widely accepted generalisation or an important theoretical claim. He therefore concludes that there is no reason to adopt more rigorous data collection standards. We challenge Philips' conclusion by presenting three cases from the literature where a faulty intuition has led to incorrect generalisations and mistaken theorising, plausibly due to cognitive biases on the part of the researchers. Furthermore, we present additional arguments for rigorous data collection standards. For example, allowing lax data collection standards has the undesirable effect that the results and claims will often be ignored by researchers with stronger methodological standards. Finally, we observe that behavioural experiments are easier to conduct in English than ever before, with the advent of Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk, a marketplace interface that can be used for collecting behavioural data over the internet.
在语法和语义研究中,常用的方法是对句子/意义对的可接受性进行判断,通常由论文的作者进行判断,有时也会得到同事的反馈。这种方法不允许对科学假设进行适当的检验,因为:(a)实验参与者数量少(通常是一个);(b)实验刺激数量少(通常是一个);(c)研究者和参与者的认知偏差;(d)前面语境的影响(例如,研究人员最近可能正在考虑的其他结构)。在本文中,我们对一些支持在语法/语义研究中继续使用传统非定量方法的论点进行了回应。菲利普斯(2009)最近对传统方法进行了辩护,他认为到目前为止,句法研究中的非定量方法还没有带来危害。菲利普斯认为,在文献中,没有一个不正确的直觉判断成为被广泛接受的概括或重要理论主张的基础。因此,他得出结论,没有理由采用更严格的数据收集标准。我们通过从文献中提出三个案例来挑战飞利浦的结论,其中错误的直觉导致了错误的概括和错误的理论化,这似乎是由于研究人员的认知偏见。此外,我们提出了严格的数据收集标准的额外论据。例如,允许宽松的数据收集标准会产生不良影响,即结果和主张往往会被具有更严格的方法标准的研究人员忽略。最后,我们观察到,随着亚马逊(Amazon.com)的土耳其机器人(Mechanical Turk)的出现,用英语进行行为实验比以往任何时候都更容易,这是一个可以用来在互联网上收集行为数据的市场界面。
{"title":"The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research","authors":"E. Gibson, Evelina Fedorenko, Diogo Almeida, Leon Bergen, Joan Bresnan, David Caplan, Nick Chater, Morten H. Christiansen, Mike Frank, Adele Goldberg, Helen Goodluck, Greg Hickok, Ray Jackendoff, N. Kanwisher, R. Levy, Maryellen Macdonald, James Myers, Colin Phillips, Steven Piantadosi, Steve Pinker, D. Poeppel, Omer Preminger, Ian Roberts, Greg Scontras, Jon Sprouse, Carson Schü, Mike Tanenhaus, Vince Walsh, Duane Watson, E. Zweig","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.515080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.515080","url":null,"abstract":"The prevalent method in syntax and semantics research involves obtaining a judgement of the acceptability of a sentence/meaning pair, typically by just the author of the paper, sometimes with feedback from colleagues. This methodology does not allow proper testing of scientific hypotheses because of (a) the small number of experimental participants (typically one); (b) the small number of experimental stimuli (typically one); (c) cognitive biases on the part of the researcher and participants; and (d) the effect of the preceding context (e.g., other constructions the researcher may have been recently considering). In the current paper we respond to some arguments that have been given in support of continuing to use the traditional nonquantitative method in syntax/semantics research. One recent defence of the traditional method comes from Phillips (2009), who argues that no harm has come from the nonquantitative approach in syntax research thus far. Phillips argues that there are no cases in the literature where an incorrect intuitive judgement has become the basis for a widely accepted generalisation or an important theoretical claim. He therefore concludes that there is no reason to adopt more rigorous data collection standards. We challenge Philips' conclusion by presenting three cases from the literature where a faulty intuition has led to incorrect generalisations and mistaken theorising, plausibly due to cognitive biases on the part of the researchers. Furthermore, we present additional arguments for rigorous data collection standards. For example, allowing lax data collection standards has the undesirable effect that the results and claims will often be ignored by researchers with stronger methodological standards. Finally, we observe that behavioural experiments are easier to conduct in English than ever before, with the advent of Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk, a marketplace interface that can be used for collecting behavioural data over the internet.","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2010.515080","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59133841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 160
The interaction of subsyllabic encoding and stress assignment: A new examination of an old problem in Spanish. 次音节编码和重音分配的相互作用:对西班牙语中一个老问题的新审视。
Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2011-12-19 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.610595
Michael Shelton, Chip Gerfen, Nicolás Gutiérrez Palma

This study employs a naming task to examine the role of the syllable in speech production, focusing on a lesser-studied aspect of syllabic processing, the interaction of subsyllabic patterns (i.e. syllable phonotactics) and higher-level prosody, in this case, stress assignment in Spanish. Specifically, we examine a controversial debate in Spanish regarding the interaction of syllable weight and stress placement, showing that traditional representations of weight fail to predict the differential modulation of stress placement by rising versus falling diphthongs in Spanish nonce forms. Our results also suggest that the internal structure of the syllable plays a larger role than is assumed in the processing literature in that it modulates higher-level processes such as stress encoding. Our results thus inform the debate regarding syllable weight in Spanish and linguistic theorizing more broadly, as well as expand our understanding of the importance of the syllable, and more specifically its internal structure, in modulating word processing.

本研究采用命名任务来考察音节在语音产生中的作用,重点关注音节加工的一个较少研究的方面,即次音节模式(即音节语音策略)和更高层次韵律的相互作用,在本研究中是西班牙语的重音分配。具体来说,我们研究了西班牙语中关于音节重量和重音位置相互作用的有争议的辩论,表明传统的重量表征不能预测西班牙语nonce形式中上升和下降双元音对重音位置的不同调节。我们的研究结果还表明,音节的内部结构比加工文献中假设的更重要,因为它调节了更高层次的过程,如重音编码。因此,我们的研究结果为关于西班牙语音节权重和语言学理论的争论提供了更广泛的信息,并扩展了我们对音节重要性的理解,更具体地说,它的内部结构,在调节文字处理中。
{"title":"The interaction of subsyllabic encoding and stress assignment: A new examination of an old problem in Spanish.","authors":"Michael Shelton,&nbsp;Chip Gerfen,&nbsp;Nicolás Gutiérrez Palma","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2011.610595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.610595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study employs a naming task to examine the role of the syllable in speech production, focusing on a lesser-studied aspect of syllabic processing, the interaction of subsyllabic patterns (i.e. syllable phonotactics) and higher-level prosody, in this case, stress assignment in Spanish. Specifically, we examine a controversial debate in Spanish regarding the interaction of syllable weight and stress placement, showing that traditional representations of weight fail to predict the differential modulation of stress placement by rising versus falling diphthongs in Spanish nonce forms. Our results also suggest that the internal structure of the syllable plays a larger role than is assumed in the processing literature in that it modulates higher-level processes such as stress encoding. Our results thus inform the debate regarding syllable weight in Spanish and linguistic theorizing more broadly, as well as expand our understanding of the importance of the syllable, and more specifically its internal structure, in modulating word processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2011.610595","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31144048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Volume 27, 2012, List of Reviewers 2012年第27卷,审稿人名单
Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.737612
{"title":"Volume 27, 2012, List of Reviewers","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2012.737612","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.737612","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2012.737612","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59135581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Volume 27, 2012, Author Index 2012年第27卷,作者索引
Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.737611
{"title":"Volume 27, 2012, Author Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2012.737611","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.737611","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2012.737611","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59135570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Language and cognitive processes
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1