首页 > 最新文献

Cancer Communications最新文献

英文 中文
Whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens identify SHOC2 as a genetic dependency in NRAS-mutant melanoma 全基因组CRISPR-Cas9敲除筛选鉴定出在nras突变黑色素瘤中,SHOC2是一种遗传依赖性。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70013
Andrea Y. Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, Xuenan Zhang, Francis W. Hunter, Dean C. Singleton, Stephen M. F. Jamieson

Mutations in the oncogene NRAS that induce constitutive RAS-GTPase activity lead to unchecked cell proliferation and migration through downstream activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling pathways [1]. These mutations occur in approximately 20% of melanomas and very rarely coexist with BRAF V600 mutations. NRAS-mutant melanoma is associated with poor survival [2] and represents an unmet clinical need, with no effective therapies available following immunotherapy failure.

Identification of contextual essential genes that exert stronger fitness effects on NRAS-mutant melanoma cells presents an opportunity for the discovery of targeted therapies. In this study, we employed CRISPR-Cas9-mediated whole-genome dropout screens to identify genetic dependencies in NRAS-mutant melanoma. Typically, melanoma cell lines are cultured under ambient (∼20%) O2 conditions, despite O2 concentrations of < 8% at the epidermal-dermal junction where melanocytes reside, resulting in adaptations in gene and protein expression [3]. Therefore, for our screens, we used a panel of early-passage New Zealand Melanoma (NZM) cell lines that were established and cultured under physiological (5%) O2 conditions [4].

Six NRAS-mutant and seven NRAS-wildtype (five BRAF-mutant, two BRAF/NRAS/NF1-wildtype) NZM cell lines (Supplementary Table S1) were transduced in multiple replicates with the Brunello single guide RNA (sgRNA) library at a multiplicity of infection of approximately 0.3 and screened at 5% O2 for up to 35 days (Supplementary Methods and Materials). All NZM lines were cultured for transduction at fewer than 10 passages from derivation. The representation of the sgRNA libraries was assessed to evaluate transducibility, with any cell lines exhibiting poor sgRNA representation (< 80% of sgRNAs detected with ≥1 count) excluded from further analyses (Supplementary Table S2). Moderate to high representation was observed in nine of the 13 NZM cell lines, whereas four cell lines were excluded due to < 80% of sgRNAs being detected (Figure 1A). Reduced sgRNA representation was accompanied by dropout of non-targeting control (NTC) sgRNAs (Figure 1A), greater read count inequality (Supplementary Figure S1, Supplementary Table S2) and reduced correlation with the Brunello library plasmids and between individual cell line replicates (Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting stochastic evolution rather than knockout-induced fitness effects.

We used BAGEL2 to estimate gene essentiality relative to reference sets of common essential and nonessential genes. Typically, tissue-agnostic gene sets are used for this purpose [5], but we established a combined essential gene set incorporating both tissue-agnostic and melanoma-sp

致癌基因NRAS的突变诱导RAS-GTPase活性,通过下游活化丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)和磷酸肌苷激酶(PI3K)信号通路[1],导致细胞增殖和迁移不受控制。这些突变发生在大约20%的黑色素瘤中,很少与BRAF V600突变共存。nras突变黑色素瘤与低生存率[2]相关,代表了未满足的临床需求,在免疫治疗失败后没有有效的治疗方法。鉴定对nras突变黑色素瘤细胞施加更强适应度效应的上下文必需基因为发现靶向治疗提供了机会。在这项研究中,我们使用crispr - cas9介导的全基因组辍学筛选来鉴定nras突变黑色素瘤的遗传依赖性。通常,黑色素瘤细胞系在环境(~ 20%)O2条件下培养,尽管O2浓度为&lt;8%在黑色素细胞所在的表皮真皮交界处,导致基因和蛋白质表达的适应。因此,对于我们的筛选,我们使用了一组早期传代新西兰黑色素瘤(NZM)细胞系,这些细胞系是在生理(5%)O2条件下建立和培养的。6个NRAS突变型和7个NRAS野生型(5个BRAF突变型,2个BRAF/NRAS/ nf1野生型)的NZM细胞系(补充表S1)用Brunello单导RNA (sgRNA)文库在感染的倍数约为0.3的情况下进行多次重复转导,并在5% O2下筛选长达35天(补充方法和材料)。所有的NZM系在10代以内进行转导培养。评估sgRNA文库的表达以评估可转导性,任何细胞系都表现出较差的sgRNA表达(&lt;80%计数≥1的sgrna被排除在进一步分析之外(补充表S2)。在13个NZM细胞系中有9个观察到中等到高代表性,而4个细胞系由于&lt;80%的sgrna被检测到(图1A)。sgRNA表达的减少伴随着非靶向控制(NTC) sgRNA的缺失(图1A),更大的读取计数不平等(补充图S1,补充表S2),以及与Brunello文库质粒和单个细胞系复制之间的相关性降低(补充图S2),这表明随机进化而不是敲除诱导的适应度效应。我们使用BAGEL2来估计相对于常见必要和非必要基因的参考集的基因重要性。通常,组织不可知论基因集用于此目的b[5],但我们建立了一个结合组织不可知论和黑色素瘤特异性必需基因(补充表S3)的组合必需基因集,显示出高精确召回率(补充图S3A),在NZM37细胞中常见必需基因和非必需基因的分布之间有明显的分离(图1B,补充图S3B)。用组织特异性基因补充组织不可知基因,可以拓宽共同必需基因的范围,提高BAGEL2分析的敏感性,在设计CRISPR退出筛选时,这是一个有价值的考虑因素。使用组合必需基因集的BAGEL2分析揭示了常见必需基因和非必需基因在NZM细胞系中的分布差异(补充图S4)。具有高sgRNA表达的细胞系在常见必需基因和非必需基因的分布之间表现出明显的分离(图1C),而四个被排除的细胞系和NZM74则显示出&gt;60%的基因集分布重叠(补充表S4)。对5个nras突变型和4个nras野生型细胞系的比较分析显示,59个候选基因在nras突变型黑色素瘤细胞系中比在nras野生型细胞系中更为重要(P &lt;0.01;补充表S5)。正如预期的那样,鉴于其致癌作用,NRAS是最受欢迎的,验证了我们在NRAS突变黑色素瘤中识别遗传依赖性的方法。下一个最突出的打击是SHOC2, MAPK信号的正调节因子(图1D)。为了验证我们的发现,我们使用DepMap 24Q2(补充表S1)提取的数据,在20% O2条件下,对54株全基因组Avana sgRNA文库筛选的黑色素瘤细胞系进行了为期21天的BAGEL2分析。由于DepMap采用严格的筛选质量标准,因此Avana黑色素瘤筛查显示出较高的sgRNA代表性(补充表S6),除两例外,所有参考基因集分布之间的重叠不到30%(补充图S5,补充表S7)。与NZM筛选结果一致,NRAS-突变型细胞系中比NRAS-野生型细胞系中最重要的两个基因是NRAS和SHOC2(图1E-F)。 此外,这些是唯一在两组筛选中排名前30位的基因(补充表S5)。Reactome通路分析显示,与DNA修复、RNA代谢、翻译和核糖体RNA加工相关的基因过度表达,而不是MAPK信号传导(补充图S6)。为了证实其在nras突变型黑色素瘤细胞中的遗传依赖性,我们在三个nras突变型和三个nras野生型NZM细胞系中分别敲除了SHOC2。与非必需基因敲除细胞或NTC细胞相比,在nras突变细胞系的所有复制转导中,用三种独立的sgRNA耗尽SHOC2后,观察到细胞增殖减少(图1G,补充图S7)。相反,敲除SHOC2并不影响nras -野生型细胞的增殖,其生长与非必需基因敲除和/或NTC细胞相似(图1H)。到第28天,与NTC细胞相比,每种细胞系中三种SHOC2 sgrna中至少有两种的SHOC2敲除nras突变细胞系的生长明显降低,而在nras野生型细胞系中没有观察到显著差异(补充图S8)。此外,在两个nras突变型NZM17重复中,在第28天,SHOC2敲除与ERK磷酸化降低有关,但在nras野生型NZM37细胞中则没有(图1I)。作为联合敲除,第三个NZM17重复群体在第28天恢复了部分SHOC2表达。然而,在较早的时间点,它没有检测到SHOC2表达,并且显示出ERK磷酸化的减少,类似于在28天的NZM17 R1和R2培养中观察到的,以及在使用RAF二聚体抑制剂belvarafenib处理的SHOC2野生型细胞中观察到的(补充图S9)。为了证实在生理氧条件下,SHOC2敲除的影响并不局限于NZM细胞,我们用三个SHOC2 sgrna转导sk - mel2 nras突变黑色素瘤细胞,观察到细胞增殖和ERK磷酸化的类似减少,与nras突变而非nras野生型NZM细胞系相当。此外,敲除SHOC2增加了对RAF二聚体抑制剂belvarafenib和naporafenib的敏感性(补充图S10)。尽管在nras突变型培养物中,敲除SHOC2可在28天内减少增殖,但在nras野生型培养物中却没有,我们无法确认这些影响是否能长期维持或在体内维持。虽然有报道称,在kras突变的胰腺和肺肿瘤异种移植物中,SHOC2缺失可阻止肿瘤生长[6,7],但本文并未尝试此类研究。在混合敲除培养中,由于其生长优势,表达SHOC2的细胞在体外或体内[8]中都可能出现阳性选择,这可能低估了SHOC2敲除对nras突变肿瘤生长的真正影响。这个问题可以通过克隆敲除来缓解;然而,这些克隆体的生长速度可能非常缓慢,如果有的话。SHOC2通过与MRAS和PP1C形成全磷酸酶复合物,在MAPK信号传导调控中发挥关键作用,该复合物通过抑制磷酸化位点[9]的去磷酸化激活RAF蛋白。与nras -野生型细胞[1]相反,在nras -突变细胞中特异性诱导的SHOC2的必要性可能反映了它们对构成性MAPK信号的依赖性(癌基因成瘾)。此外,突变型NRAS可能在SHOC2-RAS-PP1C复合体中替代MRAS,并且由于其组成活性,在NRAS-野生型细胞[10]中比SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C复合体更大程度上促进RAF的激活。此前已经发现,在其他ras相关癌症中,SHOC2是一种遗传依赖性[6,7],现在我们的
{"title":"Whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens identify SHOC2 as a genetic dependency in NRAS-mutant melanoma","authors":"Andrea Y. Gu,&nbsp;Tet Woo Lee,&nbsp;Aziza Khan,&nbsp;Xuenan Zhang,&nbsp;Francis W. Hunter,&nbsp;Dean C. Singleton,&nbsp;Stephen M. F. Jamieson","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70013","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mutations in the oncogene <i>NRAS</i> that induce constitutive RAS-GTPase activity lead to unchecked cell proliferation and migration through downstream activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling pathways [<span>1</span>]. These mutations occur in approximately 20% of melanomas and very rarely coexist with <i>BRAF</i> V600 mutations. <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma is associated with poor survival [<span>2</span>] and represents an unmet clinical need, with no effective therapies available following immunotherapy failure.</p><p>Identification of contextual essential genes that exert stronger fitness effects on <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cells presents an opportunity for the discovery of targeted therapies. In this study, we employed CRISPR-Cas9-mediated whole-genome dropout screens to identify genetic dependencies in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma. Typically, melanoma cell lines are cultured under ambient (∼20%) O<sub>2</sub> conditions, despite O<sub>2</sub> concentrations of &lt; 8% at the epidermal-dermal junction where melanocytes reside, resulting in adaptations in gene and protein expression [<span>3</span>]. Therefore, for our screens, we used a panel of early-passage New Zealand Melanoma (NZM) cell lines that were established and cultured under physiological (5%) O<sub>2</sub> conditions [<span>4</span>].</p><p>Six <i>NRAS</i>-mutant and seven <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype (five <i>BRAF</i>-mutant, two <i>BRAF</i>/<i>NRAS</i>/<i>NF1</i>-wildtype) NZM cell lines (Supplementary Table S1) were transduced in multiple replicates with the Brunello single guide RNA (sgRNA) library at a multiplicity of infection of approximately 0.3 and screened at 5% O<sub>2</sub> for up to 35 days (Supplementary Methods and Materials). All NZM lines were cultured for transduction at fewer than 10 passages from derivation. The representation of the sgRNA libraries was assessed to evaluate transducibility, with any cell lines exhibiting poor sgRNA representation (&lt; 80% of sgRNAs detected with ≥1 count) excluded from further analyses (Supplementary Table S2). Moderate to high representation was observed in nine of the 13 NZM cell lines, whereas four cell lines were excluded due to &lt; 80% of sgRNAs being detected (Figure 1A). Reduced sgRNA representation was accompanied by dropout of non-targeting control (NTC) sgRNAs (Figure 1A), greater read count inequality (Supplementary Figure S1, Supplementary Table S2) and reduced correlation with the Brunello library plasmids and between individual cell line replicates (Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting stochastic evolution rather than knockout-induced fitness effects.</p><p>We used BAGEL2 to estimate gene essentiality relative to reference sets of common essential and nonessential genes. Typically, tissue-agnostic gene sets are used for this purpose [<span>5</span>], but we established a combined essential gene set incorporating both tissue-agnostic and melanoma-sp","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"709-713"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143646894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive DSRCT multi-omics analyses unveil CACNA2D2 as a diagnostic hallmark and super-enhancer-driven EWSR1::WT1 signature gene 全面的 DSRCT 多组学分析揭示了 CACNA2D2 作为诊断标志和超级增强子驱动的 EWSR1::WT1 特征基因。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70015
Florian Henning Geyer, Alina Ritter, Seneca Kinn-Gurzo, Tobias Faehling, Jing Li, Armin Jarosch, Carine Ngo, Endrit Vinca, Karim Aljakouch, Azhar Orynbek, Shunya Ohmura, Thomas Kirchner, Roland Imle, Laura Romero-Pérez, Juan Díaz-Martín, Stefanie Bertram, Enrique de Álava, Clémence Henon, Sophie Postel-Vilnay, Ana Banito, Martin Sill, Yvonne Versleijen-Jonkers, Benjamin Friedrich Berthold Mayer, Martin Ebinger, Monika Sparber-Sauer, Sabine Stegmaier, Daniel Baumhoer, Wolfgang Hartmann, Jeroen Krijgsveld, David Horst, Olivier Delattre, Patrick Joseph Grohar, Thomas Georg Phillip Grünewald, Florencia Cidre-Aranaz
<p>Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive cancer that predominantly affects adolescents and young adults, typically developing at sites lined by mesothelium [<span>1, 2</span>]. DSRCT is genetically defined by a chromosomal translocation that fuses the N-terminus of EWS RNA binding protein 1 (<i>EWSR1</i>) to the C-terminus of Wilms tumor protein (<i>WT1)</i>, forming EWSR1::WT1 [<span>3</span>]. This fusion encodes a potent transcription factor and is the only known driver of oncogenic transformation in DSRCT [<span>4</span>]. The lack of a comprehensive understanding of DSRCT biology parallels its dismal survival rate (5%-20%) [<span>1</span>]. These challenges are exacerbated by the absence of clinical trials, the limited systematic collection and analysis of DSRCT biomaterial [<span>1</span>], and the notable lack of specific diagnostic markers, necessitating resource-intensive molecular testing for an accurate diagnosis.</p><p>Here we first focused on identifying promising candidates for validation as single, fast, and reliable diagnostic DSRCT markers. For this, we performed differential gene expression (DEG) analysis on datasets comprising patient samples from 32 DSRCT and 20 morphological mimics, identifying 23 genes overexpressed in DSRCT (log<sub>2</sub> fold change (log<sub>2</sub>FC) > 2.5; adjusted <i>P</i>-value (<i>Padj)</i> < 0.01; Figure 1A, Supplementary Figure S1A). Secondly, we analyzed EWSR1::WT1 binding sites derived from chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) data [<span>5</span>] obtained from the JN-DSRCT-1 cell line, identifying 2,065 genomic loci likely regulated by EWSR1::WT1 (Figure 1A). Third, we established JN-DSRCT-1 and SK-DSRCT2 cell lines expressing doxycycline (DOX)-inducible short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated EWSR1::WT1 knockdown (KD) (Supplementary Figure S1B). Differential protein expression (DEP) analysis of these cells identified 104 proteins consistently regulated across both cell lines (log<sub>2</sub>FC > 1.0 and <i>Padj</i> < 0.01; Figure 1A, Supplementary Table S1). The intersection of these analyses revealed calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit alpha2delta 2 (CACNA2D2) and IQ motif containing G (IQCG) as potential DSRCT biomarkers (Figure 1A). <i>CACNA2D2</i> was selected for validation due to its significantly higher expression in DSRCTs compared to <i>IQCG</i> (<i>P</i> < 0.001; Figure 1A). Indeed, DSRCT exhibited the highest expression of <i>CACNA2D2</i> among all studied morphological mimics and normal tissues (<i>P <</i> 0.001; Supplementary Figures S1C-D). Further ChIP-seq data and motif analyses of EWSR1::WT1 binding coordinates and histone marks in JN-DSRCT-1 and four DSRCT patient samples [<span>5, 6</span>] suggested a direct regulatory role of EWSR1::WT1 through an enhancer interaction at the <i>CACNA2D2</i> locus (Figure 1B). Notably, KD of EWSR1::WT1 in JN-DSRCT-1 resulted in a loss of the EWSR1::WT1 signal and H
结缔组织增生小圆细胞瘤(DSRCT)是一种侵袭性癌症,主要影响青少年和年轻人,通常发生在间皮层排列的部位[1,2]。DSRCT的遗传定义是染色体易位,将EWS RNA结合蛋白1 (EWSR1)的n端与Wilms肿瘤蛋白(WT1)的c端融合,形成EWSR1::WT1[3]。这种融合编码一种有效的转录因子,是DSRCT[4]中唯一已知的致癌转化驱动因素。缺乏对DSRCT生物学的全面了解与其令人沮丧的生存率(5%-20%)相似。由于缺乏临床试验,DSRCT生物材料[1]的系统收集和分析有限,以及明显缺乏特定的诊断标记,需要资源密集的分子检测来进行准确诊断,这些挑战加剧了。在这里,我们首先专注于确定有希望的候选物,作为单一、快速、可靠的诊断性DSRCT标记物进行验证。为此,我们对来自32例DSRCT和20例形态模拟患者样本的数据集进行了差异基因表达(DEG)分析,鉴定出23个基因在DSRCT中过表达(log2倍变化(log2FC) &gt;2.5;调整p值(Padj) &lt;0.01;图1A,补充图S1A)。其次,我们分析了来自染色质免疫沉淀的EWSR1::WT1结合位点,随后从JN-DSRCT-1细胞系获得测序(ChIP-seq)数据[5],确定了2065个可能由EWSR1::WT1调控的基因组位点(图1A)。第三,我们建立了表达多西环素(DOX)诱导的短发卡RNA (shRNA)介导的EWSR1::WT1敲低(KD)的JN-DSRCT-1和SK-DSRCT2细胞系(Supplementary Figure S1B)。这些细胞的差异蛋白表达(DEP)分析鉴定出104种蛋白在两种细胞系中一致受到调节(log2FC &gt;1.0和Padj &lt;0.01;图1A,补充表S1)。这些分析的交集揭示了钙电压门控通道辅助亚基alpha2delta 2 (CACNA2D2)和含有IQ基序G (IQCG)作为潜在的DSRCT生物标志物(图1A)。之所以选择CACNA2D2进行验证,是因为它在dsrct中的表达明显高于IQCG (P &lt;0.001;图1 a)。事实上,DSRCT在所有形态学模拟和正常组织中CACNA2D2的表达最高(P &lt;0.001;补充数据S1C-D)。进一步的ChIP-seq数据和对JN-DSRCT-1和4个DSRCT患者样本中EWSR1::WT1结合坐标和组蛋白标记的基序分析[5,6]表明EWSR1::WT1通过CACNA2D2位点的增强子相互作用直接调控(图1B)。值得注意的是,JN-DSRCT-1中EWSR1::WT1的KD导致了CACNA2D2位点EWSR1::WT1信号和组蛋白H3赖氨酸27乙酰化(H3K27ac)增强子标记的缺失(图1B)。此外,染色质相互作用数据[6]显示了连接EWSR1::WT1结合位点和CACNA2D2转录起始位点的19个环,这些环在EWSR1::WT1 KD时被耗尽(图1C)。超级增强子(SE)分析进一步表明,EWSR1::WT1结合的增强子在JN-DSRCT-1中表现出典型的SE H3K27ac谱,在EWSR1::WT1 KD上缺失(图1D,补充表S2)。在表达不同EWSR1::WT1亚型的三种DSRCT细胞系模型中,EWSR1::WT1的转录后和翻译后KD (Supplementary Figure S2A)导致CACNA2D2表达显著降低(图1E-F, Supplementary Figure S1B, Supplementary Figure S2B-F)。此外,来自MeT-5A间皮细胞[6]的ChIP-seq数据- DSRCT的潜在起源细胞[7,8]-异位表达不同的EWSR1::WT1亚型(-KTS, +KTS或-KTS/+KTS)表明直接调控,证明H3K27ac信号和V5或ha标记的EWSR1::WT1亚型在CACNA2D2增强子区域共出现(Supplementary Figure S2G)。值得注意的是,用对照载体转染的MeT-5A细胞在该位点未显示明显的信号(补充图S2G)。来自表达不同EWSR1::WT1亚型的MeT-5A细胞[6]的公开rna测序(RNA-seq)数据显示,在EWSR1::WT1存在时,CACNA2D2存在差异表达(4.1≤log2FC≤5.9,Padj &lt;0.001)(补充图S2H)。最后,对稳定表达dox诱导的异位EWSR1::WT1表达盒的MeT-5A细胞进行定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)分析,证实EWSR1::WT1诱导后,CACNA2D2显著高过表达(Supplementary Figure S2I)。综上所述,这些结果强调EWSR1::WT1足以驱动CACNA2D2的表达。对met - 5a衍生数据的SE分析显示,EWSR1::WT1结合的CACNA2D2增强子在异位表达EWSR1::WT1−KTS + KTS时成为SE (Supplementary Figure S2J)。 为了探讨CACNA2D2是否可以作为致癌EWSR1::WT1转化的替代指标,我们通过对32例DSRCT患者样本的基因表达数据进行相关性分析,定义了CACNA2D2基因集和基因标记(补充图S3A,补充表S3-S4)。接下来,通过对来自三个DSRCT细胞系的EWSR1::WT1 KD新生成的体内和体外[4]材料进行联合DEG分析,计算EWSR1::WT1特征(补充图S3A,补充表S4)。值得注意的是,CACNA2D2基因集的快速基因集富集分析(fGSEA)显示了高度显著的(Padj &lt;EWSR1::WT1特征呈强正富集(归一化富集分数,NESEWSR1::WT1 = 3.6)。此外,对32例DSRCT患者样本表达数据的单样本基因集富集分析(ssGSEA)证实,EWSR1::WT1与CACNA2D2的特征显著相关(r = 0.75),突出了CACNA2D2与EWSR1::WT1之间的原位转录互连(图1G)。这些观察结果进一步得到了原位生成肿瘤的单细胞(sc)来源特征的支持,使用两个DSRCT细胞系,在原发(n = 221)和转移(n = 221)位置具有dox诱导的EWSR1::WT1 KD(图1G,补充表S4)。事实上,我们的单细胞数据的ssGSEA显示,无论肿瘤位置如何,我们生成的EWSR1::WT1和CACNA2D2特征的NES之间存在高度显著的相关性(图1G),这意味着CACNA2D2相关基因也是转移性DSRCT细胞的特征(补充图S3B)。为了描述CACNA2D2和EWSR1::WT1在DSRCT中相互作用的特异性,我们使用我们的EWSR1::WT1和CACNA2D2签名对来自20个DSRCT形态模拟的表达数据进行了ssGSEA(图1H)。在这里,与DSRCT相比,非DSRCT癌症实体的所有特征的网元和相关强度都明显较低(补充图S3C-D)。这些结果进一步强调了CACNA2D2和EWSR1::WT1相互作用在DSRCT中的高特异性。此外,在来自4名DSRCT患者(n = 11个样本)的单细胞rna测序(scRNA-seq)数据中,大量和sc来
{"title":"Comprehensive DSRCT multi-omics analyses unveil CACNA2D2 as a diagnostic hallmark and super-enhancer-driven EWSR1::WT1 signature gene","authors":"Florian Henning Geyer,&nbsp;Alina Ritter,&nbsp;Seneca Kinn-Gurzo,&nbsp;Tobias Faehling,&nbsp;Jing Li,&nbsp;Armin Jarosch,&nbsp;Carine Ngo,&nbsp;Endrit Vinca,&nbsp;Karim Aljakouch,&nbsp;Azhar Orynbek,&nbsp;Shunya Ohmura,&nbsp;Thomas Kirchner,&nbsp;Roland Imle,&nbsp;Laura Romero-Pérez,&nbsp;Juan Díaz-Martín,&nbsp;Stefanie Bertram,&nbsp;Enrique de Álava,&nbsp;Clémence Henon,&nbsp;Sophie Postel-Vilnay,&nbsp;Ana Banito,&nbsp;Martin Sill,&nbsp;Yvonne Versleijen-Jonkers,&nbsp;Benjamin Friedrich Berthold Mayer,&nbsp;Martin Ebinger,&nbsp;Monika Sparber-Sauer,&nbsp;Sabine Stegmaier,&nbsp;Daniel Baumhoer,&nbsp;Wolfgang Hartmann,&nbsp;Jeroen Krijgsveld,&nbsp;David Horst,&nbsp;Olivier Delattre,&nbsp;Patrick Joseph Grohar,&nbsp;Thomas Georg Phillip Grünewald,&nbsp;Florencia Cidre-Aranaz","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70015","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70015","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive cancer that predominantly affects adolescents and young adults, typically developing at sites lined by mesothelium [&lt;span&gt;1, 2&lt;/span&gt;]. DSRCT is genetically defined by a chromosomal translocation that fuses the N-terminus of EWS RNA binding protein 1 (&lt;i&gt;EWSR1&lt;/i&gt;) to the C-terminus of Wilms tumor protein (&lt;i&gt;WT1)&lt;/i&gt;, forming EWSR1::WT1 [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;]. This fusion encodes a potent transcription factor and is the only known driver of oncogenic transformation in DSRCT [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. The lack of a comprehensive understanding of DSRCT biology parallels its dismal survival rate (5%-20%) [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. These challenges are exacerbated by the absence of clinical trials, the limited systematic collection and analysis of DSRCT biomaterial [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;], and the notable lack of specific diagnostic markers, necessitating resource-intensive molecular testing for an accurate diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here we first focused on identifying promising candidates for validation as single, fast, and reliable diagnostic DSRCT markers. For this, we performed differential gene expression (DEG) analysis on datasets comprising patient samples from 32 DSRCT and 20 morphological mimics, identifying 23 genes overexpressed in DSRCT (log&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; fold change (log&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;FC) &gt; 2.5; adjusted &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;-value (&lt;i&gt;Padj)&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.01; Figure 1A, Supplementary Figure S1A). Secondly, we analyzed EWSR1::WT1 binding sites derived from chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) data [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;] obtained from the JN-DSRCT-1 cell line, identifying 2,065 genomic loci likely regulated by EWSR1::WT1 (Figure 1A). Third, we established JN-DSRCT-1 and SK-DSRCT2 cell lines expressing doxycycline (DOX)-inducible short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated EWSR1::WT1 knockdown (KD) (Supplementary Figure S1B). Differential protein expression (DEP) analysis of these cells identified 104 proteins consistently regulated across both cell lines (log&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;FC &gt; 1.0 and &lt;i&gt;Padj&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.01; Figure 1A, Supplementary Table S1). The intersection of these analyses revealed calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit alpha2delta 2 (CACNA2D2) and IQ motif containing G (IQCG) as potential DSRCT biomarkers (Figure 1A). &lt;i&gt;CACNA2D2&lt;/i&gt; was selected for validation due to its significantly higher expression in DSRCTs compared to &lt;i&gt;IQCG&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001; Figure 1A). Indeed, DSRCT exhibited the highest expression of &lt;i&gt;CACNA2D2&lt;/i&gt; among all studied morphological mimics and normal tissues (&lt;i&gt;P &lt;&lt;/i&gt; 0.001; Supplementary Figures S1C-D). Further ChIP-seq data and motif analyses of EWSR1::WT1 binding coordinates and histone marks in JN-DSRCT-1 and four DSRCT patient samples [&lt;span&gt;5, 6&lt;/span&gt;] suggested a direct regulatory role of EWSR1::WT1 through an enhancer interaction at the &lt;i&gt;CACNA2D2&lt;/i&gt; locus (Figure 1B). Notably, KD of EWSR1::WT1 in JN-DSRCT-1 resulted in a loss of the EWSR1::WT1 signal and H","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"702-708"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70015","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143633515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Blocking ITGA5 potentiates the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy on glioblastoma by remodeling tumor-associated macrophages 阻断ITGA5可通过重塑肿瘤相关巨噬细胞增强抗pd -1治疗对胶质母细胞瘤的疗效。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70016
Rongrong Zhao, Ziwen Pan, Jiawei Qiu, Boyan Li, Yanhua Qi, Zijie Gao, Wei Qiu, Weijie Tang, Xiaofan Guo, Lin Deng, Gang Li, Hao Xue

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) is largely refractory to antibodies against programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) therapy. Fully understanding the cellular heterogeneity and immune adaptations in response to anti-PD-1 therapy is necessary to design more effective immunotherapies for GBM. This study aimed to dissect the molecular mechanisms of specific immunosuppressive subpopulations to drive anti-PD-1 resistance in GBM.

Methods

We systematically analysed single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics data from GBM tissues receiving anti-PD-1 therapy to characterize the microenvironment alterations. The biological functions of a novel circular RNA (circRNA) were validated both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanically, co-immunoprecipitation, RNA immunoprecipitation and pull-down assays were conducted.

Results

Mesenchymal GBM (MES-GBM) cells, which were associated with a poor prognosis, and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1)+ myeloid-derived macrophages (SPP1+ MDMs), a unique subpopulation of MDMs with complex functions, preferentially accumulated in non-responders to anti-PD-1 therapy, indicating that MES-GBM cells and SPP1+ MDMs were the main anti-PD-1-resistant cell subpopulations. Functionally, we determined that circular RNA succinate dehydrogenase complex assembly factor 2 (circSDHAF2), which was positively associated with the abundance of these two anti-PD-1-resistant cell subpopulations, facilitated the formation of a regional MES-GBM and SPP1+ MDM cell interaction loop, resulting in a spatially specific adaptive immunosuppressive microenvironment. Mechanically, we found that circSDHAF2 promoted MES-GBM cell formation by stabilizing the integrin alpha 5 (ITGA5) protein through N-glycosylation. Meanwhile, the N-glycosylation of the ITGA5 protein facilitated its translocation into exosomes and subsequent delivery to MDMs to induce the formation of SPP1+ MDMs, which in turn maintained the MES-GBM cell status and induced T-cell dysfunction via the SPP1-ITGA5 pathway, ultimately promoting GBM immune escape. Importantly, our findings demonstrated that antibody-mediated ITGA5 blockade enhanced anti-PD-1-mediated antitumor immunity.

Conclusions

This work elucidated the potential tissue adaptation mechanism of intratumoral dynamic interactions between MES-GBM cells, MDMs and T cells in anti-PD-1 non-responders and identified the therapeutic potential of target

背景:胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)对抗程序性细胞死亡1 (anti-PD-1)治疗的抗体在很大程度上是难治的。充分了解细胞异质性和免疫适应对抗pd -1治疗的反应是设计更有效的GBM免疫疗法的必要条件。本研究旨在剖析特异性免疫抑制亚群驱动GBM抗pd -1耐药的分子机制。方法:我们系统地分析了接受抗pd -1治疗的GBM组织的单细胞RNA测序和空间转录组学数据,以表征微环境的改变。一种新型环状RNA (circRNA)的生物学功能在体外和体内都得到了验证。机械上进行共免疫沉淀、RNA免疫沉淀和拉下实验。结果:与预后不良相关的间充质GBM (Mesenchymal GBM)细胞和分泌磷酸化蛋白1 (SPP1)+髓源性巨噬细胞(SPP1+ MDMs)是一种独特的MDMs亚群,具有复杂的功能,在抗pd -1治疗无反应的细胞中优先积累,表明Mesenchymal GBM细胞和SPP1+ MDMs是主要的抗pd -1耐药细胞亚群。在功能上,我们确定环状RNA琥珀酸脱氢酶复合物组装因子2 (circSDHAF2)与这两个抗pd -1抗性细胞亚群的丰度呈正相关,促进了区域MES-GBM和SPP1+ MDM细胞相互作用环的形成,从而形成了空间特异性的适应性免疫抑制微环境。机械上,我们发现circSDHAF2通过n -糖基化稳定整合素α 5 (ITGA5)蛋白,从而促进MES-GBM细胞形成。同时,ITGA5蛋白的n -糖基化促进其易位到外泌体并随后递送到MDMs,诱导SPP1+ MDMs的形成,从而通过SPP1-ITGA5途径维持MES-GBM细胞状态并诱导t细胞功能障碍,最终促进GBM免疫逃逸。重要的是,我们的研究结果表明,抗体介导的ITGA5阻断增强了抗pd -1介导的抗肿瘤免疫。结论:本工作阐明了MES-GBM细胞、MDMs和T细胞在抗pd -1无应答者的瘤内动态相互作用的潜在组织适应机制,并确定了靶向ITGA5降低抗pd -1耐药的治疗潜力。
{"title":"Blocking ITGA5 potentiates the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy on glioblastoma by remodeling tumor-associated macrophages","authors":"Rongrong Zhao,&nbsp;Ziwen Pan,&nbsp;Jiawei Qiu,&nbsp;Boyan Li,&nbsp;Yanhua Qi,&nbsp;Zijie Gao,&nbsp;Wei Qiu,&nbsp;Weijie Tang,&nbsp;Xiaofan Guo,&nbsp;Lin Deng,&nbsp;Gang Li,&nbsp;Hao Xue","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Glioblastoma (GBM) is largely refractory to antibodies against programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) therapy. Fully understanding the cellular heterogeneity and immune adaptations in response to anti-PD-1 therapy is necessary to design more effective immunotherapies for GBM. This study aimed to dissect the molecular mechanisms of specific immunosuppressive subpopulations to drive anti-PD-1 resistance in GBM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We systematically analysed single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics data from GBM tissues receiving anti-PD-1 therapy to characterize the microenvironment alterations. The biological functions of a novel circular RNA (circRNA) were validated both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanically, co-immunoprecipitation, RNA immunoprecipitation and pull-down assays were conducted.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Mesenchymal GBM (MES-GBM) cells, which were associated with a poor prognosis, and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1)<sup>+</sup> myeloid-derived macrophages (SPP1<sup>+</sup> MDMs), a unique subpopulation of MDMs with complex functions, preferentially accumulated in non-responders to anti-PD-1 therapy, indicating that MES-GBM cells and SPP1<sup>+</sup> MDMs were the main anti-PD-1-resistant cell subpopulations. Functionally, we determined that circular RNA succinate dehydrogenase complex assembly factor 2 (circSDHAF2), which was positively associated with the abundance of these two anti-PD-1-resistant cell subpopulations, facilitated the formation of a regional MES-GBM and SPP1<sup>+</sup> MDM cell interaction loop, resulting in a spatially specific adaptive immunosuppressive microenvironment. Mechanically, we found that circSDHAF2 promoted MES-GBM cell formation by stabilizing the integrin alpha 5 (ITGA5) protein through N-glycosylation. Meanwhile, the N-glycosylation of the ITGA5 protein facilitated its translocation into exosomes and subsequent delivery to MDMs to induce the formation of SPP1<sup>+</sup> MDMs, which in turn maintained the MES-GBM cell status and induced T-cell dysfunction via the SPP1-ITGA5 pathway, ultimately promoting GBM immune escape. Importantly, our findings demonstrated that antibody-mediated ITGA5 blockade enhanced anti-PD-1-mediated antitumor immunity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This work elucidated the potential tissue adaptation mechanism of intratumoral dynamic interactions between MES-GBM cells, MDMs and T cells in anti-PD-1 non-responders and identified the therapeutic potential of target","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"677-701"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143623806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rare germline ATM variants predispose to secondary cancer in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients 罕见的种系ATM变异体易导致慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者继发性癌症。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70010
Anna Petrackova, Jirina Manakova, Romana Nesnadna, Zuzana Kubova, Tomas Papajik, Eva Kriegova
<p>Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has one of the strongest familial risks of all cancers, as evidenced by the eight-fold increased risk seen in relatives of CLL patients, yet much of the heritable risk remains unexplained [<span>1</span>]. Patients with CLL also have a high rate of secondary cancer, i.e., the development of second primary malignancy, compared to the general population, which may be explained by immune dysregulation due to CLL and/or its treatment, but also by environmental and genetic risk factors [<span>2</span>]. The development of second cancer in patients with CLL contributes to higher morbidity in these patients [<span>2</span>]. As the population of long-term CLL survivors expands due to novel agents used in therapy, the identification of patients with risk of developing the second cancer may help to improve longevity of CLL patients.</p><p>In this monocentric study, we aimed to assess whether patients with CLL carrying rare germline variants in <i>ATM</i> have a higher risk of familial CLL or a higher risk of cancer in first-degree relatives than patients without these variants. Next, we aimed to assess whether patients carrying rare <i>ATM</i> variants develop secondary cancer or develop CLL at an earlier age than patients without these variants, and whether these variants influence the time to first treatment (TTFT) and overall survival (OS) in patients with CLL. In this large cohort, we also sought to confirm our previous observation that rare variants in <i>ATM</i> are associated with the development of IGHV-unmutated CLL [<span>3</span>], which has a worse prognosis compared to IGHV-mutated disease.</p><p>A total of 629 patients with CLL were included in the study with a median follow-up of 6 years (range, 0.08-37.80; Supplementary Materials and Methods, Supplementary Table S1). Ten (1.6%) of these patients carried rare pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants in <i>ATM</i> and 18 (2.9%) carried rare variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in <i>ATM</i>, all heterozygous (Supplementary Table S2, Figure 1). Patients harbouring P/LP <i>ATM</i> variants had a higher risk of secondary cancer (50.0% of patients; relative risk [RR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-5.47; <i>P</i> = 0.001) than those without these variants (17.0%). Similarly, patients harbouring rare VUSes in <i>ATM</i> had a higher risk of secondary cancer (46.0% of patients; RR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.48-4.41; <i>P</i> = 0.001) than those without these variants (17.0%). Half (7/14) of patients who carried these germline <i>ATM</i> variants and had secondary cancer were first diagnosed with CLL, while the other half (5/9) were first diagnosed with another malignancy. Secondary cancers were always of a different type, with the exception of prostate cancer, which occurred in 2 patients.</p><p>Regarding age at diagnosis of first malignancy in patients with secondary cancer, there was no significant difference between patients carrying rare P/LP
慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)是所有癌症中家族性风险最强的癌症之一,CLL患者亲属的风险增加了8倍,但大部分遗传风险仍未得到解释。与一般人群相比,CLL患者继发性癌症的发生率也很高,即第二原发性恶性肿瘤的发展,这可能与CLL和/或其治疗引起的免疫失调有关,但也与环境和遗传危险因素[2]有关。CLL患者的第二癌发展导致这些患者的发病率更高。由于治疗中使用了新的药物,长期CLL幸存者的人数不断增加,识别有发展第二种癌症风险的患者可能有助于提高CLL患者的寿命。在这项单中心研究中,我们旨在评估携带ATM中罕见种系变异的CLL患者是否比没有这些变异的患者具有更高的家族性CLL风险或更高的一级亲属癌症风险。接下来,我们旨在评估携带罕见ATM变异体的患者是否比没有这些变异体的患者更早发生继发性癌症或发生CLL,以及这些变异体是否影响CLL患者的首次治疗时间(TTFT)和总生存期(OS)。在这个大型队列中,我们还试图证实我们之前的观察,即ATM中的罕见变异与ighv未突变的CLL[3]的发展相关,与ighv突变的疾病相比,其预后更差。该研究共纳入629例CLL患者,中位随访时间为6年(范围0.08-37.80;补充材料和方法,补充表S1)。这些患者中有10例(1.6%)携带ATM罕见致病性(P)或可能致病性(LP)变异,18例(2.9%)携带ATM罕见不确定意义变异(VUS),均为杂合(Supplementary Table S2,图1)。携带P/LP ATM变异的患者继发性癌症的风险更高(50.0%的患者;相对危险度[RR], 2.88;95%置信区间[CI], 1.51-5.47;P = 0.001)比没有这些变异的患者(17.0%)要高。同样,在ATM中携带罕见VUSes的患者继发性癌症的风险更高(46.0%的患者;RR 2.56;95% ci, 1.48-4.41;P = 0.001)比没有这些变异的患者(17.0%)要高。携带这些种系ATM变异并继发性癌症的患者中有一半(7/14)首次诊断为CLL,而另一半(5/9)首次诊断为另一种恶性肿瘤。继发性癌症除2例前列腺癌外,均为不同类型。关于继发性癌症患者的首次恶性肿瘤诊断年龄,携带罕见P/LP ATM变异体的患者(中位年龄62岁)与没有这些变异体的患者(中位年龄63岁)之间没有显著差异,CLL诊断年龄也是如此(中位年龄65岁对64岁)。对于携带VUSes的ATM患者组,同样在首次恶性肿瘤诊断年龄和CLL诊断年龄上无显著差异(补充表S1)。然后,我们研究了罕见的P/LP ATM变体是否与家族性CLL相关。在我们的队列中,根据患者笔记评估,3%的患者(18/629)在一级亲属中发现有CLL,但没有发现携带罕见的ATM变体。关于一级亲属的癌症患病率,携带P/LP ATM变异的患者其亲属患癌症的风险更高(70.0%的患者;RR 1.55;95% ci, 1.02-2.34;P = 0.040)比没有这些变异的患者(45.0%)要高。P/LP ATM变异体患者与非这些变异体患者的淋巴增生性疾病患病率无显著差异。我们进一步感兴趣的是罕见的ATM变异是否会影响CLL的临床结果,特别是TTFT和OS。在有和没有P/LP罕见ATM变异的患者中,中位TTFT和OS没有显著差异(补充图S1)。关于里希特转化(RT),携带罕见P/LP ATM变异的患者发生RT的风险更高(20.0%;RR 6.01;95% ci, 1.62-122.33;P = 0.007),而没有这些变异的患者(3.3%)。我们进一步证实了我们和其他作者之前的观察[3,4],即罕见的P/LP ATM变体的存在与CLL过程中del(11q)的获得有关(60.0%;RR 2.73;95% ci, 1.61-4.62;P = 0.002)。最后,在这个大型队列中,我们证实了P/LP罕见ATM变异体患者发生ighv未突变疾病的风险更高(90.0%的患者;RR 1.62;95% ci, 1.30-2.02;P & lt;0.001),而没有这些变异的患者(56.0%)。 我们的研究调查了罕见的P/LP ATM变异对CLL的影响,未发现这些变异与家族性CLL相关,进一步证实了CLL个体家族的观察结果[5,6]。这一发现表明,罕见的ATM变异不是CLL遗传因素的原因,而是增加了患癌症的风险,正如我们的CLL患者继发性癌症发病率较高的相关性所显示的那样。继发性癌症的风险增加与CLL[2]相关,我们的研究发现罕见的P/LP/VUS ATM变异是CLL继发性癌症的易感因素,携带罕见ATM变异的患者将从癌症预防筛查中获益最多。关于CLL患者的临床结果,我们的研究没有发现罕见的P/LP ATM种系变异与CLL诊断年龄较早有关,也没有发现TTFT或OS降低有关。同样,先前的研究没有观察到罕见的ATM种系变异对CLL中OS[7]和TTFT[8]的影响,而后一项研究发现,患有ATM种系变异的CLL患者在诊断时更年轻。与先前的报道一致[4,7],发现罕见的ATM变异体与CLL过程中del(11q)的获得有关,作为剩余等位基因的第二个打击。在携带罕见的P/LP ATM变异的患者中观察到更高的RT风险,这一发现值得进一步研究。此外,在携带P/LP ATM变异的患者的一级亲属中观察到更高的癌症风险。重要的是,我们在一个大型队列中证实了我们之前的观察,即罕见的ATM变异与ighv未突变的CLL bb0风险增加相关。ATM在淋巴细胞的形成中具有特定的作用:它是V(D)J重组和体细胞高突变以及随后的免疫球蛋白类开关重组过程所必需的[9,10]。P/LP种系ATM变体究竟如何干扰这些过程值得进一步研究。我们承认我们的研究有局限性。首先,罕见ATM变异体患者的样本量不大,类似于其他罕见种系变异体的研究[4,7,8]。值得注意的是,本研究使用了迄今为止具有完整临床数据的最大CLL队列来研究CLL中罕见的ATM变体。其次,本研究中的变异分类是基于当前的ClinVar评价,可能会根据未来的研究进行重新分类。总之,罕见的P/LP ATM变异在CLL中的意义似乎在于,罕见ATM变异携带者对CLL的易感性更高,特别是对具有未突变IGHV状态的预后不良的CLL,以及在CLL诊断之前或之后继发性癌症的风险增加三倍。Anna Petrackova和Eva Kriegova设计了研究。Jirina Manakova和Romana Nesnadna进行了实验。Zuzana Kubova和Tomas Papajik收集了患者样本和临床特征。安娜·佩特拉科娃写了手稿。Eva Kriegova对手稿进行了严格的修改。所有作者都阅读并批准了最终的手稿。作者宣称他们没有竞争利益。这项研究得到了在Palacký大学青年研究员资助项目中实施的JG_2024_035项目的支持,由Palacky大学内部资助机构(IGA_LF_2025_014),部分由捷克共和国卫生部(MH CZ-DRO (FNOL, 00098892))支持。所有患者都提供了关于为本研究目的使用生物材料的书面知情同意书,该研究根据《赫尔辛基宣言》进行,并得到了大学医院和Palacký奥洛穆茨大学伦理委员会的批准
{"title":"Rare germline ATM variants predispose to secondary cancer in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients","authors":"Anna Petrackova,&nbsp;Jirina Manakova,&nbsp;Romana Nesnadna,&nbsp;Zuzana Kubova,&nbsp;Tomas Papajik,&nbsp;Eva Kriegova","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70010","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has one of the strongest familial risks of all cancers, as evidenced by the eight-fold increased risk seen in relatives of CLL patients, yet much of the heritable risk remains unexplained [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Patients with CLL also have a high rate of secondary cancer, i.e., the development of second primary malignancy, compared to the general population, which may be explained by immune dysregulation due to CLL and/or its treatment, but also by environmental and genetic risk factors [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. The development of second cancer in patients with CLL contributes to higher morbidity in these patients [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. As the population of long-term CLL survivors expands due to novel agents used in therapy, the identification of patients with risk of developing the second cancer may help to improve longevity of CLL patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this monocentric study, we aimed to assess whether patients with CLL carrying rare germline variants in &lt;i&gt;ATM&lt;/i&gt; have a higher risk of familial CLL or a higher risk of cancer in first-degree relatives than patients without these variants. Next, we aimed to assess whether patients carrying rare &lt;i&gt;ATM&lt;/i&gt; variants develop secondary cancer or develop CLL at an earlier age than patients without these variants, and whether these variants influence the time to first treatment (TTFT) and overall survival (OS) in patients with CLL. In this large cohort, we also sought to confirm our previous observation that rare variants in &lt;i&gt;ATM&lt;/i&gt; are associated with the development of IGHV-unmutated CLL [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;], which has a worse prognosis compared to IGHV-mutated disease.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A total of 629 patients with CLL were included in the study with a median follow-up of 6 years (range, 0.08-37.80; Supplementary Materials and Methods, Supplementary Table S1). Ten (1.6%) of these patients carried rare pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants in &lt;i&gt;ATM&lt;/i&gt; and 18 (2.9%) carried rare variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in &lt;i&gt;ATM&lt;/i&gt;, all heterozygous (Supplementary Table S2, Figure 1). Patients harbouring P/LP &lt;i&gt;ATM&lt;/i&gt; variants had a higher risk of secondary cancer (50.0% of patients; relative risk [RR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-5.47; &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.001) than those without these variants (17.0%). Similarly, patients harbouring rare VUSes in &lt;i&gt;ATM&lt;/i&gt; had a higher risk of secondary cancer (46.0% of patients; RR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.48-4.41; &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.001) than those without these variants (17.0%). Half (7/14) of patients who carried these germline &lt;i&gt;ATM&lt;/i&gt; variants and had secondary cancer were first diagnosed with CLL, while the other half (5/9) were first diagnosed with another malignancy. Secondary cancers were always of a different type, with the exception of prostate cancer, which occurred in 2 patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding age at diagnosis of first malignancy in patients with secondary cancer, there was no significant difference between patients carrying rare P/LP ","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"669-672"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143603972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflections and insights into the evolution of restrictive eligibility criteria for cancer clinical trials in China and beyond 对中国及其他国家癌症临床试验限制性资格标准演变的反思和见解。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70007
Huiyao Huang, Huilei Miao, Jinling Tang, Ning Li
<p>Trial eligibility criteria, which define an appropriate evaluable population through inclusion and exclusion criteria, are fundamental for reliable evidence and should be tailored to the question that the trial sets out to answer [<span>1</span>]. However, exclusion criteria for cancer trials have become increasingly restrictive over the years, with the median number increased from 21 in 1986 to 46 in 2016 [<span>2, 3</span>]. These restrictive exclusion criteria have created substantial barriers to patient access to novel therapies, hindered trial recruitment and limited the generalizability of trial results, presenting not only practical and scientific problem, but also raises important issues of equity that affect everyone [<span>4</span>].</p><p>While this longstanding issue has garnered widespread attention in the United States (US), research on the severity of restrictive criteria and efforts to modernize them in China remain scarce [<span>5</span>]. Our limited study revealed that the restriction rate for older patients aged over 75 years in cancer trials in China was 56.5%, which is more than 10 times higher than that of the US [<span>5</span>]. Meanwhile, significant shifts in patterns of exclusion criteria, such as brain metastases from conditionally excluded to not excluded, have been observed in the US since a joint recommendation on broadening cancer eligibility criteria was made in 2017 [<span>6</span>]. The above observations inspire us to understand the potential drivers behind the evolution of overly restrictive exclusion criteria, and provide insights into best practice towards modernizing eligibility criteria in China and beyond.</p><p>Regarding to the evolution of overly restrictive eligibility criteria, several fundamental factors should be emphasized. The fundamental consideration about who should be recruited is the future application of the results. Logically, those eligible for a trial should be those who are deemed beneficial from using the treatment in the future. However, when the approved indications are not impacted, sponsors and researchers tend to exclude weaker patients and recruit healthier ones due to excessive concerns about vulnerable populations and drug risk-benefit profiles. This tendency is evident in the fact that most cancer trials in the US enroll healthier patients, such as those with no brain metastases (77.4%), better performance status (PS) (65%) [<span>7</span>].</p><p>Exclusion criteria are often applied in series, meaning that participants meeting any one of the criteria are eliminated. However, many common criteria, when used alone may not represent manifestations of the underlying malignancy or the potential risk-benefit profiles. For instance, if a therapy does not undergo hepatic metabolism and is not expected to cause hepatic toxicity, strict hepatic function eligibility criteria may not be necessary, or there should be very broad entry criteria. Therefore, it is essential to consider the
试验资格标准通过纳入和排除标准确定适当的可评估人群,这是可靠证据的基础,应根据试验要回答的问题进行调整。然而,近年来,癌症试验的排除标准越来越严格,中位数从1986年的21例增加到2016年的46例[2,3]。这些限制性排除标准对患者获得新疗法造成了实质性障碍,阻碍了试验招募,限制了试验结果的可推广性,不仅提出了实际和科学问题,而且提出了影响每个人的重要公平问题。虽然这个长期存在的问题在美国引起了广泛关注,但对限制性标准的严重程度的研究以及在中国使其现代化的努力仍然很少。我们有限的研究显示,中国75岁以上老年患者在癌症试验中的限制率为56.5%,比美国的限制率高出10倍以上。与此同时,自2017年就扩大癌症资格标准提出联合建议以来,美国观察到排除标准模式发生了重大变化,例如脑转移从有条件排除到不排除。上述观察结果启发我们理解过度限制的排除标准演变背后的潜在驱动因素,并为中国和其他国家现代化资格标准的最佳实践提供见解。关于过分严格的资格标准的演变,应强调几个基本因素。应该招募谁的基本考虑是研究结果的未来应用。从逻辑上讲,那些有资格进行试验的人应该是那些被认为在未来使用这种治疗有益的人。然而,当批准的适应症不受影响时,由于过度关注弱势群体和药物风险-收益概况,申办者和研究人员倾向于排除较弱的患者并招募更健康的患者。这种趋势在美国的大多数癌症试验中都很明显,比如那些没有脑转移的患者(77.4%),更好的表现状态(PS)(65%)。排除标准通常是串联应用的,这意味着符合任何一个标准的参与者将被排除。然而,当单独使用时,许多常见的标准可能不能代表潜在恶性肿瘤的表现或潜在的风险-收益概况。例如,如果一种治疗不经过肝脏代谢,预计不会引起肝毒性,则可能不需要严格的肝功能资格标准,或者应该有非常广泛的进入标准。因此,有必要考虑每个排除标准背后的原则:它应该限制所有被怀疑有风险的群体,还是只限制那些有明确伤害基础的群体?美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)在其最新的癌症试验指南中建议,只有在明显有必要减轻潜在的安全担忧时,才应将实验室值等项目作为排除标准。研究调查人员和监管机构长期以来都厌恶风险。伦理委员会的现行审查原则加强了招募更健康患者的趋势,这些原则侧重于保护试验参与者的安全,特别是弱势群体的安全。在实践中,这常常导致赞助方和研究人员在设计资格标准时过于保守,以避免伦理委员会提出的潜在问题,并尽可能快地启动试验,尽管这剥夺了患者获得新疗法的机会。嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T)治疗的现实研究纳入了43%不符合临床试验纳入标准的患者,如PS较差、年龄较大、肿瘤负荷较重的患者,但安全性和有效性结果相当。伦理委员会必须认识到,虽然资格标准在适当应用时对保护参与者免受治疗相关风险很重要,但过于严格的标准可能会产生意想不到的后果。最新发布的良好临床实践指南明确呼吁应仔细考虑科学目标,以免不必要地将参与者排除在伦理原则之外。限制性排除标准的趋势已经走得更远,一些资格标准可能随着时间的推移被普遍接受,或者被用作模板,即使它们可能不适用。随着时间的推移,一些排除标准作为协议模板被接受,而不考虑研究药物的机制和预期适应症的知识[10]。 例如,在化疗药物的癌症试验中排除器官功能障碍患者就是典型的非选择性保留排除标准的案例。免疫相关的癌症试验,例如那些评估免疫检查点抑制剂、激活患者免疫反应以破坏肿瘤的免疫调节剂的试验,通常使用与血液学参数相关的多个资格标准,即使这些试验与严重的血液学毒性[2]无关。因此,在过去几十年中,癌症试验中资格标准的数量和复杂性显著增加[2,3]。这就导致了一个关键问题,即考虑到药物的作用机制、目标患者群体和预期的安全性,在没有强有力的医学或科学理由的情况下,一定比例的患者被排除在试验之外。除了共同理解限制性纳入标准的原因外,我们还提出了以下最佳实践,以使资格标准现代化。首先,与癌症药物研发相关的所有利益相关者需要达成基本共识,即除非有强有力的医学或科学理由,否则所有适当的患者都应该有机会被纳入试验,以确保他们平等地受益于新疗法,特别是那些没有标准治疗的患者。例如,如果有足够的临床前或类似药物证据证明该药物具有特异性肝毒性,则应对基线肝功能损害的患者采用严格的排除标准。他们不能忽视为什么这一纳入是重要的。在设计资格标准时,应充分考虑缺乏明确科学依据的排除标准的理由,特别是单独使用时。其次,为了减少先前试验中不完善或不适当的资格标准的遗留影响,申办者和研究者应该花费额外的时间和资源来确保每个单独研究的资格标准在科学上是合理的。第三,为了设计包容性试验,申办者可以聘请临床专家和患者倡导团体,以确保满足特定人群的需求和优先事项。例如,让老年学家参与设计临床试验,预期主要招募老年人,可能是有益的。方法学专家可能有助于使用替代试验设计来支持更广泛的纳入,例如实用临床试验或利用真实世界数据(RWD)。第四,尽快制定、发布和培训监管指南,不仅针对申办者和研究者,也针对伦理委员会,以促进临床试验标准的合理制定和审查。我们总结了美国关于癌症试验资格的相关指南,为其他国家提供了很好的参考(表1)。这些指南涵盖了针对不同人群的明确入组建议,建议的策略以减轻纳入人群的不确定性,并通过要求额外的分析和考虑对产品标签的潜在影响来鼓励试验更具包容性。通常建议与FDA讨论。值得注意的是,我们应该避免从一个极端转向另一个极端。我们建议根据监管指南、高质量证据或合理的医学判断,选择性地扩大资格标准。无选择地扩大研究范围可能导致纳入不能从治疗中获益的试验参与者,并可能危及参与者的安全。临床试验的资格标准是一把双刃剑;保持平衡的方法是至关重要的,从来都不是一件容易的事。因此,如何科学地实现临床试验资格标准的现代化也值得中国和世界各国的共同努力。美国已经提出了将RWD与人工智能战略相结合进行相关研究的可行框架,中国也正在进行类似的RWD研究[12,13]。综上所述,申办者和研究者的主观意愿、伦理委员会的保守原则以及方案设计中对模板的过度依赖是导致临床试验中排除标准过于严格的三个主要因素。为了使这些标准现代化,并在中国等服务不足的国家实现人口多样性,所有利益相关者必须达成共识,即所有癌症患者都应该有机会参与试验,并采用最佳实践,特别是对于发起人、监管机构和伦理委员会而言。黄辉耀、李宁是这篇文章的构思者,唐金陵也参与了这篇文章的构思。 黄辉耀和苗慧蕾起草了初稿,所有作者都参与了后续版本的编写。所有作者都阅读并批准了最终的手稿。作者宣称他们没有竞争利益。不适用。
{"title":"Reflections and insights into the evolution of restrictive eligibility criteria for cancer clinical trials in China and beyond","authors":"Huiyao Huang,&nbsp;Huilei Miao,&nbsp;Jinling Tang,&nbsp;Ning Li","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70007","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70007","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Trial eligibility criteria, which define an appropriate evaluable population through inclusion and exclusion criteria, are fundamental for reliable evidence and should be tailored to the question that the trial sets out to answer [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. However, exclusion criteria for cancer trials have become increasingly restrictive over the years, with the median number increased from 21 in 1986 to 46 in 2016 [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;]. These restrictive exclusion criteria have created substantial barriers to patient access to novel therapies, hindered trial recruitment and limited the generalizability of trial results, presenting not only practical and scientific problem, but also raises important issues of equity that affect everyone [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While this longstanding issue has garnered widespread attention in the United States (US), research on the severity of restrictive criteria and efforts to modernize them in China remain scarce [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. Our limited study revealed that the restriction rate for older patients aged over 75 years in cancer trials in China was 56.5%, which is more than 10 times higher than that of the US [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. Meanwhile, significant shifts in patterns of exclusion criteria, such as brain metastases from conditionally excluded to not excluded, have been observed in the US since a joint recommendation on broadening cancer eligibility criteria was made in 2017 [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. The above observations inspire us to understand the potential drivers behind the evolution of overly restrictive exclusion criteria, and provide insights into best practice towards modernizing eligibility criteria in China and beyond.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding to the evolution of overly restrictive eligibility criteria, several fundamental factors should be emphasized. The fundamental consideration about who should be recruited is the future application of the results. Logically, those eligible for a trial should be those who are deemed beneficial from using the treatment in the future. However, when the approved indications are not impacted, sponsors and researchers tend to exclude weaker patients and recruit healthier ones due to excessive concerns about vulnerable populations and drug risk-benefit profiles. This tendency is evident in the fact that most cancer trials in the US enroll healthier patients, such as those with no brain metastases (77.4%), better performance status (PS) (65%) [&lt;span&gt;7&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Exclusion criteria are often applied in series, meaning that participants meeting any one of the criteria are eliminated. However, many common criteria, when used alone may not represent manifestations of the underlying malignancy or the potential risk-benefit profiles. For instance, if a therapy does not undergo hepatic metabolism and is not expected to cause hepatic toxicity, strict hepatic function eligibility criteria may not be necessary, or there should be very broad entry criteria. Therefore, it is essential to consider the","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"673-676"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143613073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dlk1 is a novel adrenocortical stem/progenitor cell marker that predicts malignancy in adrenocortical carcinoma Dlk1是一种新的肾上腺皮质干细胞/祖细胞标志物,可预测肾上腺皮质癌的恶性程度。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70012
Katia Mariniello, James F. H. Pittaway, Barbara Altieri, Kleiton Silva Borges, Irene Hadjidemetriou, Claudio Ribeiro, Gerard Ruiz-Babot, David S. Tourigny, Jiang A. Lim, Julie Foster, Julie Cleaver, Jane Sosabowski, Nafis Rahman, Milena Doroszko, Constanze Hantel, Sandra Sigala, Andrea Abate, Mariangela Tamburello, Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades, Margaret Wierman, Charlotte Hall, Laila Parvanta, Tarek E. Abdel-Aziz, Teng-Teng Chung, Aimee Di Marco, Fausto Palazzo, Celso E. Gomez-Sanchez, David R. Taylor, Oliver Rayner, Cristina L. Ronchi, Carles Gaston-Massuet, Silviu Sbiera, William M. Drake, Emanuel Rognoni, Matthias Kroiss, David T. Breault, Martin Fassnacht, Leonardo Guasti
<p>Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with no widely available biomarkers and commonly presents at later stages with a bleak prognosis [<span>1</span>]. Dysregulation of signaling pathways involved in the organogenesis and homeostasis of the adrenal cortex is implicated in its pathogenesis [<span>2</span>]. The paternally expressed, cleavable protein delta-like non-canonical Notch ligand 1 (DLK1) is expressed in rat adrenocortical progenitor cells [<span>3</span>] and in clusters of relatively undifferentiated cells in the human adrenal gland [<span>4</span>]. Its expression is rare in most adult human tissues but has been reported across various cancers, often associated with worse survival [<span>5</span>]. Here we define the role of DLK1 in adrenocortical development, self-renewal, and the development and progression of ACC.</p><p>Dlk1<sup>+</sup> cells were present in both the capsule and cortex during embryonic development but became restricted to the capsule postnatally in both male and female mice (Supplementary Figure S1), with minimal overlap in expression with Axin-2 (Wnt-active) cells, their early descendants, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα), a marker of mesenchymal stem/fibroblastic cells (Supplementary Figure S2). Dlk1 cells were rarely positive for Ki-67, whereas <i>Gli1</i> expression in the capsule, unlike Dlk1, remained high during development and throughout postnatal life (Supplementary Figure S3). Genetic lineage tracing using inducible <i>Dlk1<sup>CreERT2/+</sup></i>; <i>Rosa<sup>tdTomato/+</sup></i> mice showed that Dlk1<sup>+</sup> cells functioned as adrenocortical stem cells during development (Figure 1A-F), but were largely dormant postnatally and inactive during postnatal adrenocortical remodeling (Supplementary Figure S4).</p><p>Capsular-like cells are pathognomonic of subcapsular hyperplasia (SH), a histological hallmark in mouse adrenals that occurs spontaneously in aged females and in certain strains/transgenic models after gonadectomy (GDX) [<span>6</span>]. SH foci are thought to represent a morphological continuum progressing toward adrenocortical tumors. Dlk1 was not expressed in SH or in subsequent tumors in two GDX mouse models (Supplementary Figure S5). Moreover, spontaneous SH foci in aged mice were neither enriched in nor derived from Dlk1-expressing cells (Supplementary Figure S6), supporting the hypothesis that SH results from a de-differentiation event [<span>7</span>]. Interestingly, Dlk1 was re-expressed in an autochthonous mouse model of ACC, in which concomitant inactivation of <i>Trp53</i> and activation of <i>Ctnnb1</i>, driven by the aldosterone synthase promoter (<i>BPCre</i>) [<span>8</span>], leads to ACC formation with high penetrance. In 23 tumor samples from 17 mice (9 female), Dlk1 expression was low or absent in benign and pre-malignant tumors, moderate in localized ACC, and higher in metastatic disease, both in the primary tumors and in lung meta
这些数据表明,ACC的转移潜力可能受到DLK1水平的影响。对DLK1过表达和低表达的ACC细胞系H295R的RNA测序显示,DLK1的高表达与免疫信号基因集的低表达相关,表明DLK1的致癌作用可能在一定程度上通过与衰老诱导的免疫重塑[9]相关的机制介导(Supplementary Figure S9A-E)。DLK1具有可切割的外结构域,可在血清中检测到。BPCre小鼠(与年龄匹配的对照组相比)和两种皮下肿瘤小鼠模型的血清Dlk1水平显著升高:一种使用BPCre肿瘤来源细胞系BCH-ACC3A[10],另一种注射H295R细胞(图1N-Q)。在所有病例中,肿瘤大小与血清DLK1水平有很强的正相关(Supplementary Figure S10)。在伦敦队列中,人类ACC患者术前血清DLK1水平明显高于良性肾上腺皮质腺瘤患者,可以以高灵敏度和特异性预测ACC的诊断(图1R-S)。这一发现在德国队列中得到了验证,在疾病负担更重的患者中观察到明显更高的血清DLK1水平(图1T,补充表S4)。与组织中一样,血清DLK1水平与其他预后或临床病理特征无关(补充图S11A-F)。术后血液样本显示肿瘤切除后DLK1水平显著降低(图1U)。两组患者术前血清DLK1水平与组织DLK1表达呈正相关(图1V,补充图S11G)。这些发现表明,血清DLK1来源于ACC,其水平反映了原发肿瘤的DLK1表达和疾病的程度。对四个人类acc的DLK1+和DLK1−区域进行空间全转录组分析。令人惊讶的是,类固醇生物合成是DLK1+组中最富集的基因本体途径,与胆固醇合成基因的上调一致,这表明DLK1+区域比DLK1−区域具有更高的类固醇生成潜力(图1W,补充图S12-S13)。在H295R转录组数据中,随着DLK1剂量的增加,肾上腺分化基因的表达增加,进一步支持了这一发现(补充图S9F-H)。为了进一步研究表达一种肾上腺皮质干细胞标记物的ACC细胞中类固醇生成潜能增强这一明显的悖论,我们将四种不同的人ACC细胞系(H295R、muc1、TVBF7和CU-ACC1)和一种小鼠ACC细胞系(BCH-ACC3A)培养成球体。与2D培养相比,H295R、TVBF7和CU-ACC1在3D培养中DLK1表达显著增强,有趣的是,在MUC-1中观察到DLK1蛋白的从头表达(图1X,补充图S14A-F)。液相色谱串联质谱分析显示,与2D细胞相比,H295R、CU-ACC1和BCH-ACC3A中3D球体的类固醇分泌量明显增加,并且在muc1和TVBF7中有增加类固醇生成的趋势(补充表S5)。荧光激活细胞分选显示,培养21天后,DLK1+细胞产生的集落形成单位明显多于DLK1−群体(图1Y,补充图S14G-H)。这些发现表明,表达真正的肾上腺皮质干细胞标记物的ACC细胞在保留一些祖细胞特征的同时具有优越的类固醇生成潜力,这可能解释了DLK1在ACC中的表达对预后的负面影响。这些数据将Dlk1定义为一种新的肾上腺皮质干细胞/祖细胞标志物,在肾上腺皮质器官发生和恶性肿瘤发展中都有作用。小鼠和人ACC的表达数据表明,DLK1与恶性肿瘤和肿瘤侵袭性增加有关。此外,DLK1有望作为ACC患者的诊断、预后和随访的生物标志物,特别是通过使用台式测定法进行血清测量。考虑到DLK1在这种恶性肿瘤中的优先表达,需要进一步更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这一作用,并研究DLK1作为ACC的潜在治疗靶点。概念化:Leonardo Guasti, James F.H. Pittaway和Katia Mariniello。研究方法:Leonardo Guasti, James F.H. Pittaway, Katia Mariniello, Barbara Altieri, Irene Hadjidemetriou, Silviu Sbiera, Matthias Kroiss, Martin Fassnacht, William M. Drake, Kleiton Silva Borges和David T. breult。验证:Kleiton Silva Borges, Claudio Ribeiro, Katia Mariniello, James F.H. Pittaway, Barabara Altieri, Jiang A. Lim, David T. breult, David S. Tourigny和Charlotte Hall。形式分析:James F.H. Pittaway, Katia Mariniello, Barbara Altieri和Kleiton Silva Borges。调查:Gerard Ruiz-Babot, Oliver Rayner, David R. Taylor, James F.H. Pittaway, Katia Mariniello, Barbara Altieri, Leonardo Guasti, Silviu Sbiera, Carles Gaston-Massuet和Emanuel Rognoni。资源:Sandra Sigala, Andrea Abate, Mariangela Tamburello, Katja kiseljk - vassiliades, Margaret Wierman, Laila Parvanta, Tarek E. Abdel-Aziz, tenteng - teng Chung, Aimee Di Marco, Fausto Palazzo, Celso E. Gomez-Sanchez, Constanze Hantel, Julie Foster, Julie Cleaver, Jane Sosabowski, Nafis Rahman, Milena Doroszko和Cristina L. Ronchi。数据管理:James F.H. Pittaway, Katia Mariniello和Leonardo Guasti。原稿:James F.H. Pittaway, Katia Mariniello和Leonardo Guasti。写作-评审和编辑:所有作者。监督:Leonardo Guasti, William M. Drake, Martin Fassnacht, Matthias Kroiss, David T. breult项目管理:Leonardo Guasti。作者声明在本文的研究、作者身份和/或发表方面没有潜在的利益冲突。这项工作得到了MRC (MR/X021017/1, MR/S022155/1), BBSRC (BB/V007246/1), Barts Charity (MGU0436), Rosetrees Trust (M355-F1),圣巴塞洛缪医学院医院信托基金,德国研究基金会(Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 314061271)和美国国立卫生研究院医师-科学家职业发展奖(R01DK123694)的支持。在获得参与者的书面知情同意后,根据研究方案内分泌肿瘤遗传学(REC: 06/Q0104/133),从伦敦圣巴塞洛缪大学学
{"title":"Dlk1 is a novel adrenocortical stem/progenitor cell marker that predicts malignancy in adrenocortical carcinoma","authors":"Katia Mariniello,&nbsp;James F. H. Pittaway,&nbsp;Barbara Altieri,&nbsp;Kleiton Silva Borges,&nbsp;Irene Hadjidemetriou,&nbsp;Claudio Ribeiro,&nbsp;Gerard Ruiz-Babot,&nbsp;David S. Tourigny,&nbsp;Jiang A. Lim,&nbsp;Julie Foster,&nbsp;Julie Cleaver,&nbsp;Jane Sosabowski,&nbsp;Nafis Rahman,&nbsp;Milena Doroszko,&nbsp;Constanze Hantel,&nbsp;Sandra Sigala,&nbsp;Andrea Abate,&nbsp;Mariangela Tamburello,&nbsp;Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades,&nbsp;Margaret Wierman,&nbsp;Charlotte Hall,&nbsp;Laila Parvanta,&nbsp;Tarek E. Abdel-Aziz,&nbsp;Teng-Teng Chung,&nbsp;Aimee Di Marco,&nbsp;Fausto Palazzo,&nbsp;Celso E. Gomez-Sanchez,&nbsp;David R. Taylor,&nbsp;Oliver Rayner,&nbsp;Cristina L. Ronchi,&nbsp;Carles Gaston-Massuet,&nbsp;Silviu Sbiera,&nbsp;William M. Drake,&nbsp;Emanuel Rognoni,&nbsp;Matthias Kroiss,&nbsp;David T. Breault,&nbsp;Martin Fassnacht,&nbsp;Leonardo Guasti","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70012","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70012","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with no widely available biomarkers and commonly presents at later stages with a bleak prognosis [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Dysregulation of signaling pathways involved in the organogenesis and homeostasis of the adrenal cortex is implicated in its pathogenesis [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. The paternally expressed, cleavable protein delta-like non-canonical Notch ligand 1 (DLK1) is expressed in rat adrenocortical progenitor cells [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;] and in clusters of relatively undifferentiated cells in the human adrenal gland [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. Its expression is rare in most adult human tissues but has been reported across various cancers, often associated with worse survival [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. Here we define the role of DLK1 in adrenocortical development, self-renewal, and the development and progression of ACC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dlk1&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; cells were present in both the capsule and cortex during embryonic development but became restricted to the capsule postnatally in both male and female mice (Supplementary Figure S1), with minimal overlap in expression with Axin-2 (Wnt-active) cells, their early descendants, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα), a marker of mesenchymal stem/fibroblastic cells (Supplementary Figure S2). Dlk1 cells were rarely positive for Ki-67, whereas &lt;i&gt;Gli1&lt;/i&gt; expression in the capsule, unlike Dlk1, remained high during development and throughout postnatal life (Supplementary Figure S3). Genetic lineage tracing using inducible &lt;i&gt;Dlk1&lt;sup&gt;CreERT2/+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/i&gt;; &lt;i&gt;Rosa&lt;sup&gt;tdTomato/+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/i&gt; mice showed that Dlk1&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; cells functioned as adrenocortical stem cells during development (Figure 1A-F), but were largely dormant postnatally and inactive during postnatal adrenocortical remodeling (Supplementary Figure S4).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Capsular-like cells are pathognomonic of subcapsular hyperplasia (SH), a histological hallmark in mouse adrenals that occurs spontaneously in aged females and in certain strains/transgenic models after gonadectomy (GDX) [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;]. SH foci are thought to represent a morphological continuum progressing toward adrenocortical tumors. Dlk1 was not expressed in SH or in subsequent tumors in two GDX mouse models (Supplementary Figure S5). Moreover, spontaneous SH foci in aged mice were neither enriched in nor derived from Dlk1-expressing cells (Supplementary Figure S6), supporting the hypothesis that SH results from a de-differentiation event [&lt;span&gt;7&lt;/span&gt;]. Interestingly, Dlk1 was re-expressed in an autochthonous mouse model of ACC, in which concomitant inactivation of &lt;i&gt;Trp53&lt;/i&gt; and activation of &lt;i&gt;Ctnnb1&lt;/i&gt;, driven by the aldosterone synthase promoter (&lt;i&gt;BPCre&lt;/i&gt;) [&lt;span&gt;8&lt;/span&gt;], leads to ACC formation with high penetrance. In 23 tumor samples from 17 mice (9 female), Dlk1 expression was low or absent in benign and pre-malignant tumors, moderate in localized ACC, and higher in metastatic disease, both in the primary tumors and in lung meta","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"663-668"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143540150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Low household income and income volatility increase risk of lung cancer: A nationwide retrospective cohort study 低家庭收入和收入波动增加肺癌风险:一项全国回顾性队列研究。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70011
Chiwook Chung, Dong Wook Shin, Kyu Na Lee, Sei Won Lee, Kyungdo Han
<p>Low socioeconomic conditions, including low education, low income, manual or unskilled work, and unemployment, have been associated with increased lung cancer risks [<span>1, 2</span>]. Although some studies have identified low household status as a risk factor for lung cancer, they had some limitations in terms of their study design, including limited covariates in multivariate models, and cross-sectional assessment of income status, thereby failing to describe the association between income status change over time and lung cancer [<span>1, 2</span>]. Therefore, we investigated the association between longitudinal low household income status and lung cancer in the South Korean general population. We collected information on income status for 5 years to determine the change in household income status and income volatility. We also designed multivariate regression models with covariates including demographics, lifestyle behaviors, and comorbidities. Consequently, this study investigated the relationship between economic vulnerability, such as income volatility, and lung cancer risk.</p><p>We sampled 40% (4,910,068) of individuals who underwent a national health examination in 2012 (the index year). Among them, we included 3,816,680 individuals aged 30-65 years (economically active population). Thereafter, we excluded individuals with insufficient income information, identified with any cancer (any insurance claim with the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision [ICD-10] codes for cancer [C00-97] and the critical illness registration code for cancer [V193]) before their health examination (all cancer wash-out), with insufficient medical records, and identified with any cancer within 1 year after the index date (1-year lag period, to exclude over-detection of cancer after the health examination). Finally, the remaining 3,361,091 eligible individuals started follow-up 1 year after the index date, until December 2022. The follow-up was terminated upon lung cancer development, death, or censor.</p><p>Lung cancer was identified using the ICD-10 code (C33 and C34) and matched with the critical illness registration program code (V193). The household income level was estimated based on subscribers’ monthly national health insurance premium, which is a proxy for household income. We categorized household income into quartiles (Q1 = lowest and Q4 = highest). Individuals receiving medical aid benefits (public assistance, the lowest 3% income) were assessed as a separate income category. To evaluate the temporal changes in household income status, we evaluated (1) cumulative number of years receiving medical aid (sustained low-income status) and (2) income volatility, defined as the intraindividual standard deviation (SD) of the percentage change in income (Q1 = the lowest and Q4 = the highest, Supplementary Figure S1), predicts income uncertainty and may limit health behaviors.</p><p>Covariates were collected from the health examination and
低社会经济条件,包括低教育、低收入、体力或非技术工作以及失业,与肺癌风险增加有关[1,2]。虽然一些研究已经确定低家庭状况是肺癌的危险因素,但在研究设计上存在一定的局限性,包括多变量模型协变量有限,收入状况的横断面评估,因此未能描述收入状况随时间变化与肺癌之间的关系[1,2]。因此,我们调查了韩国普通人群中纵向低收入家庭状况与肺癌之间的关系。我们收集了5年的收入状况信息,以确定家庭收入状况的变化和收入波动性。我们还设计了包含人口统计学、生活方式行为和合并症等协变量的多元回归模型。因此,本研究调查了经济脆弱性(如收入波动)与肺癌风险之间的关系。我们对2012年(指标年)接受国家健康检查的40%(4,910,068)个人进行了抽样调查。其中,我们纳入了3816680名年龄在30-65岁(经济活动人口)的个人。之后,我们排除了收入信息不充分的个体,排除了在健康检查前被诊断为任何癌症(任何使用国际疾病分类第十版[ICD-10]癌症代码[C00-97]和癌症重病登记代码[V193]的保险索赔)的个体(所有癌症冲洗),排除了医疗记录不充分的个体,排除了在索引日期后1年内被诊断为任何癌症的个体(1年滞后期)。排除健康检查后过度发现癌症的可能性。最后,剩余的3361091名符合条件的个人在指数日期一年后开始随访,直到2022年12月。随访在肺癌发展、死亡或检查结束。使用ICD-10代码(C33和C34)识别肺癌,并与危重疾病登记程序代码(V193)匹配。家庭收入是根据代表家庭收入的每月国民健康保险费来推算的。我们将家庭收入分成四分位数(Q1 =最低,Q4 =最高)。接受医疗援助福利(公共援助,收入最低的3%)的个人作为一个单独的收入类别进行评估。为了评估家庭收入状况的时间变化,我们评估了(1)接受医疗援助的累计年数(持续低收入状态)和(2)收入波动性,定义为收入百分比变化的个体内标准差(SD) (Q1 =最低,Q4 =最高,补充图S1),预测收入不确定性并可能限制健康行为。从健康检查和保险索赔数据中收集协变量,包括年龄、性别、地区、体重指数、吸烟、饮酒、定期运动、糖尿病、高血压、血脂异常和慢性肾病。数据来源和统计分析见补充资料和方法。在平均9.28±0.78年的随访期间,我们的队列中发现了20,692例新发肺癌患者。参与者平均年龄46.9±9.4岁,男性占56.5%。医疗援助受益人主要是女性(59.0%)和从不吸烟(63.9%),而最高收入群体(Q4)主要是男性(65.5%)和有吸烟史(前者,21.8%;目前,25.6%,补充表S1)。表1给出了家庭收入与肺癌之间的关系。与基线收入状况相比,医疗援助受益人患肺癌的风险最高(调整风险比[aHR], 1.23;95%可信区间[CI], 1.12-1.36)。收入越低,患肺癌的风险越高。就持续低收入状况而言,连续5年的医疗援助受益人患肺癌的风险最高(aHR, 1.19;95% ci, 1.07-1.34)。在收入波动方面,收入波动最大的个体(Q4)患肺癌的风险最高(aHR, 1.08;95% ci, 1.04-1.12)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,肺癌的累积发病率随着经济脆弱性的增加而增加(补充图S2)。在吸烟状况的分层分析中,目前吸烟者患肺癌的风险大约是从不吸烟者或曾经吸烟者的两倍。收入状况与肺癌风险之间的相关性在当前吸烟者中显著,但在从不吸烟者或曾经吸烟者中不显著(补充表S2)。 按年龄分层分析发现,低收入的影响在年龄较大的个体中更为突出。而收入波动的影响在45-55岁的个体中更为突出(补充表S3)。先前的研究已将低收入家庭与肺癌风险增加联系起来[1,2]。在我们的数据中,即使在吸烟调整后,基线低收入和持续低收入都与肺癌风险增加有关。经济脆弱性与肺癌的其他潜在社会经济风险因素有关,包括饮酒和吸烟,这些因素与经济状况不佳导致的情绪压力有关[3,4]。然而,医疗援助受益人中从不吸烟和不饮酒的比例较高。低收入还与空气污染有关,如生物质燃料和环境颗粒物[5]。此外,低收入与不太健康的食物(例如,较少的蔬菜和更多的冷冻甜点)有关。低收入与焦虑和抑郁有关,这可能会加剧经济状况的恶性循环。更重要的是,我们的研究结果表明,收入波动也与肺癌风险增加有关。收入波动最大的个人中,几乎有一半被归类为基线低收入类别(医疗援助,1.6%;第一季度,43.7%),从而在纵向方面支持经济脆弱性。对于流动性受限的家庭,在24个月内,收入波动性每增加一个标准差,就会导致健康状况恶化的可能性增加1.3%-4.3%。收入波动与健康状况不佳有关,比如抑郁症。此外,心理压力可能导致频繁或大量吸烟和饮酒。家庭收入与肺癌风险之间的关系在当前吸烟者中比从不吸烟者或曾经吸烟者中更为突出。吸烟是肺癌的最重要原因,与其他潜在的肺癌风险因素(如酒精、饮食、职业暴露和空气污染)具有协同效应,这些因素与社会经济地位低下有关,可以通过社会支持计划加以改变[10]。本研究有一定的局限性。首先,订户的国民健康保险费是估算家庭收入的一个代理,而健康保险费的确定因就业类型(雇员投保和自雇)而异,这可能导致收入估算不准确。第二,家庭收入的损失可能反映了先前不良的健康状况(反向因果关系),这可能减轻收入对肺癌的影响。第三,在健康检查中自愿参与和自我报告的问卷回答(特别是关于吸烟和饮酒)可能导致选择偏倚或回忆偏倚。第四,关于潜在风险因素的信息有限,包括空气污染、职业暴露、二手烟和其他与经济脆弱性相关的健康行为。总之,低收入地位,特别是持续低收入和收入不稳定,与肺癌发展风险增加呈剂量反应关系。这些关联在当前吸烟者中更为突出。我们的数据要求公众了解针对经济弱势群体的国家医疗保健政策(例如肺癌筛查或戒烟计划)。社会安全网和稳定的就业机会可以帮助经济弱势群体。Chiwook Chung、Dong Wook Shin、Kyu Na Lee、Sei Won Lee和Kyungdo Han构思并设计了这项研究。Kyu Na Lee和Kyungdo Han对数据收集和分析做出了贡献。这些数据由Chiwook Chung、Dong Wook Shin、Kyu Na Lee、Sei Won Lee和Kyungdo Han负责解释。Chung Chiwook和Dong Wook Shin起草了手稿。所有作者都修改并批准了最终稿件。所有作者对最终稿件内容的准确性负责。作者声明,这项研究是在没有任何商业或财务关系的情况下进行的,这可能被解释为潜在的利益冲突。资助者在研究的设计、数据的收集、分析和解释以及撰写手稿方面没有任何作用。本研究由韩国国家研究基金会(NRF)资助,由韩国政府(MSIT)资助(No。RS-2023-NR077159),韩国政府资助的国家研究基金(NRF)生物医疗技术发展计划(MSIT) (No. 1);RS-2022-NR067421RS-2023-00222687),“美国国立卫生研究院”(NIH)研究项目(编号:
{"title":"Low household income and income volatility increase risk of lung cancer: A nationwide retrospective cohort study","authors":"Chiwook Chung,&nbsp;Dong Wook Shin,&nbsp;Kyu Na Lee,&nbsp;Sei Won Lee,&nbsp;Kyungdo Han","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70011","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70011","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Low socioeconomic conditions, including low education, low income, manual or unskilled work, and unemployment, have been associated with increased lung cancer risks [&lt;span&gt;1, 2&lt;/span&gt;]. Although some studies have identified low household status as a risk factor for lung cancer, they had some limitations in terms of their study design, including limited covariates in multivariate models, and cross-sectional assessment of income status, thereby failing to describe the association between income status change over time and lung cancer [&lt;span&gt;1, 2&lt;/span&gt;]. Therefore, we investigated the association between longitudinal low household income status and lung cancer in the South Korean general population. We collected information on income status for 5 years to determine the change in household income status and income volatility. We also designed multivariate regression models with covariates including demographics, lifestyle behaviors, and comorbidities. Consequently, this study investigated the relationship between economic vulnerability, such as income volatility, and lung cancer risk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We sampled 40% (4,910,068) of individuals who underwent a national health examination in 2012 (the index year). Among them, we included 3,816,680 individuals aged 30-65 years (economically active population). Thereafter, we excluded individuals with insufficient income information, identified with any cancer (any insurance claim with the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision [ICD-10] codes for cancer [C00-97] and the critical illness registration code for cancer [V193]) before their health examination (all cancer wash-out), with insufficient medical records, and identified with any cancer within 1 year after the index date (1-year lag period, to exclude over-detection of cancer after the health examination). Finally, the remaining 3,361,091 eligible individuals started follow-up 1 year after the index date, until December 2022. The follow-up was terminated upon lung cancer development, death, or censor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lung cancer was identified using the ICD-10 code (C33 and C34) and matched with the critical illness registration program code (V193). The household income level was estimated based on subscribers’ monthly national health insurance premium, which is a proxy for household income. We categorized household income into quartiles (Q1 = lowest and Q4 = highest). Individuals receiving medical aid benefits (public assistance, the lowest 3% income) were assessed as a separate income category. To evaluate the temporal changes in household income status, we evaluated (1) cumulative number of years receiving medical aid (sustained low-income status) and (2) income volatility, defined as the intraindividual standard deviation (SD) of the percentage change in income (Q1 = the lowest and Q4 = the highest, Supplementary Figure S1), predicts income uncertainty and may limit health behaviors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Covariates were collected from the health examination and ","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"654-657"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143522629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Older adults living with gastrointestinal cancers in 2021 2021年患有胃肠癌的老年人。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70014
Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Yanfang Pang, Torlap Inkongngam, Kornnatthanai Namsathimaphorn, Krittameth Rakwong, Chuthathip Kaeosri, Benjamin Nah, Kwanjit Duangsonk, Nicole Shu Ying Tang, Neha Mittal, Donghee Kim, Mazen Noureddin, Michael B. Wallace, Amit G. Singal, Karn Wijarnpreecha, Ju Dong Yang
<p>The global average life expectancy is projected to rise to 80 years by 2040 [<span>1</span>]. Since cancer is closely linked to aging, its prevalence is expected to grow as the population ages. Advancements in cancer diagnosis and treatment have led to an increasing number of cancer survivors. In a 2021 consensus statement, the International Society for Geriatric Oncology updated its top priorities for improving care for older cancer patients [<span>2, 3</span>]. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, there were over four million deaths from gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in 2021 [<span>4</span>].</p><p>The aging population, advancements in cancer management, and shifting risk factors are undoubtedly influencing the prevalence of GI cancers in older adults [<span>5</span>]. While aging has increasingly captured the attention of policymakers and stakeholders, epidemiological data on GI cancers in older adults remains limited. Older patients are also underrepresented in GI-specific clinical trials. This study aimed to estimate the global burden of GI cancers in older adults using the most recent GBD 2021 [<span>6</span>].</p><p>The general methods used for estimating disease burden in the GBD 2021 study, including GI cancer, have been detailed in previous publications [<span>4, 6</span>]. Briefly, data were sourced from population-based cancer registries, vital registration systems, and verbal autopsy studies (Supplementary Information S1). This GBD database defines older adults as individuals aged 70 and above. The GBD 2021 study utilized the International Classification of Disease-Tenth and Ninth Revision for GI cancers. We assessed the burden of various GI cancers in older adults, including colorectal, esophageal, liver, biliary tract, pancreatic, and gastric cancers. For liver cancer, we further analyzed the burden by five main etiologies: alcohol, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), and other causes. Several statistical methods were applied to ensure data consistency, including misclassification correction, garbage code redistribution, and noise reduction algorithms. Mortality rates were evaluated using the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm), which employed Bayesian geospatial regression to account for spatial relationships in the data. The detailed CODEm methodology is listed in Supplementary Information S1. Countries were classified based on their level of development using the sociodemographic index (SDI) (Supplementary Information S2).</p><p>The incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) (i.e., years of life lost plus years lost due to disability) estimates were reported with a 95% uncertainty interval (UI), calculated as the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles from a posterior distribution of 1,000 draws. Broader UIs indicate higher uncertainty, typically resulting from limited or lower-quality dat
到2040年,全球平均预期寿命预计将增至80岁。由于癌症与老龄化密切相关,预计随着人口老龄化,其患病率将会上升。癌症诊断和治疗的进步导致越来越多的癌症幸存者。在2021年的共识声明中,国际老年肿瘤学会(International Society for Geriatric Oncology)更新了改善老年癌症患者护理的首要任务[2,3]。根据全球疾病负担(GBD)研究,2021年有超过400万人死于胃肠道(GI)癌症。人口老龄化、癌症管理的进步和危险因素的变化无疑影响着老年人胃肠道癌症的发病率[10]。虽然老龄化日益引起决策者和利益相关者的关注,但老年人胃肠道癌症的流行病学数据仍然有限。老年患者在gi特异性临床试验中的代表性也不足。本研究旨在使用最新的GBD 2021 bbb来估计老年人胃肠道癌症的全球负担。在GBD 2021研究中,估计疾病负担的一般方法,包括胃肠道癌症,已在先前的出版物中详细介绍[4,6]。简单地说,数据来源于基于人群的癌症登记处、生命登记系统和尸检研究(补充信息S1)。GBD数据库将老年人定义为70岁及以上的个体。GBD 2021研究使用了国际疾病分类第十版和第九版来诊断胃肠道癌症。我们评估了老年人各种胃肠道癌症的负担,包括结直肠癌、食管癌、肝癌、胆道癌、胰腺癌和胃癌。对于肝癌,我们进一步分析了五种主要病因的负担:酒精、慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染、慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染、代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎(MASH)和其他原因。采用了几种统计方法来确保数据一致性,包括错误分类纠正、垃圾代码重新分配和降噪算法。死亡率采用死因集合模型(CODEm)进行评估,该模型采用贝叶斯地理空间回归来解释数据中的空间关系。详细的CODEm方法列于补充资料S1。使用社会人口指数(SDI)对各国的发展水平进行分类(补充资料S2)。发病率、患病率和残疾调整生命年(DALYs)(即生命损失年数加上因残疾而损失的年数)估计值以95%的不确定性区间(UI)报告,从1,000个图的后验分布中计算2.5和97.5%。较宽的ui表明较高的不确定性,通常是由有限或较低质量的数据造成的,而较窄的ui表明更可靠的估计。年龄标准化率(asr)使用GBD 2021标准人群计算,通过稳健的贝叶斯分层队列成分模型开发。该模型整合了来自人口普查、人口登记和移民统计数据的数据,确保了所有GBD指标中特定年龄人口估计的一致性。为了评估2000年至2021年的变化,将2021年与2000年的值之差除以2000年的值。Joinpoint回归程序估计asr的年百分比变化(APC)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)。亚组间的统计差异通过非重叠CI来证明。在老年人中,有246万例胃肠道癌症病例,656万例,2916万DALYs。从2000年到2021年,发病率增加了71%,患病率增加了93%,DALYs增加了49%(图1A-C)。结直肠癌发病率最高(104万),其次是胃癌(571,500)、胰腺癌(269,330)、食管癌(253,060)、肝癌(198,110)和胆道癌(121,790)(图1A)。结直肠癌的患病率也最高(474万),其次是胃癌(885,540)、食管癌(344,330)、肝癌(226,300)、胰腺癌(200,720)和胆道癌(162,450)(图1B)。最后,结直肠癌的DALYs最高(885万),其次是胃癌(747万)、胰腺癌(419万)、食管癌(406万)、肝癌(311万)和胆道癌(148万)(图1C)。asr如图1D-F所示。从2000年到2021年,发病率、患病率和伤残调整生命年分别增加了71%、93%和49%。在此期间,老年人胰腺癌的年龄标准化发病率(ASIR)增加(APC, 0.67%;95% CI, 0.59% ~ 0.76%),肝癌(APC, 0.15%;95% CI, 0.06%至0.23%)和结直肠癌(APC, 0.06%;95% CI, 0.02%至0。 胃癌APC下降(-1.27%;95% CI, -1.46%至-1.08%)和食管癌(APC, -0.52%;95% CI, -0.74%至-0.30%),胆道癌保持稳定。胰腺癌的年龄标准化患病率(ASPR)增加(APC, 0.95%;95% CI, 0.86% ~ 1.03%),肝癌(APC, 0.60%;95% CI, 0.56% ~ 0.65%),胆道癌(APC, 0.50%;95% CI, 0.39% - 0.62%)和结直肠癌(APC, 0.42%;95% CI, 0.40% - 0.45%),胃癌发生率降低(APC, -0.78%;95% CI, -0.87%至-0.68%),食管癌保持稳定。胃癌年龄标准化DALYs (ASDALYs) (APC, -1.97%;95% CI, -2.16%至-1.77%),食管癌(APC, -1.06%;95% CI, -1.27%至-0.85%),胆道癌(APC, -0.80%;95% CI, -0.88%至-0.73%),结直肠癌(APC, -0.74%;95% CI, -0.83%至-0.66%),肝癌(APC, -0.39%;95% CI, -0.63%至-0.14%)下降。然而,胰腺癌的ASDALYs (APC, 0.36%;95% CI, 0.22%至0.50%)增加(补充表S1-S6)。按国家分列的结果列于补充图S1和补充表S7-S12。按性别、地区和SDI分层的老年人胃肠道癌负担详见补充图S2和补充信息S3-S5。我们的研究提供了过去二十年来全球老年人胃肠道癌趋势的最新评估。2021年,有656万老年人患有胃肠道癌症,发病率为246万。从2000年到2021年,患病率增加了93%,发病率增加了71%,主要原因是结直肠癌、胰腺癌和肝癌。老年患者在试验中经常被忽视,尽管老年人发病率和流行率的增加强调了开始将他们包括在内的必要性。在大多数类型的老年人消化道癌症中,ASDALYs下降,尽管总体上,DALYs增加。这些截然不同的趋势表明,可能由于更好的管理,个体疾病结局有所改善;然而,DALYs的增加反映了全球人口老龄化。此外,ASDALYs在胰腺癌和mash相关性肝癌中仍然升高。尽管对慢性HBV和HCV感染广泛使用抗病毒治疗显著降低了肝病死亡率,但肥胖和酗酒的增加导致非病毒相关性HCC的增加。我们的研究显示出一些局限性。首先,该分析依赖于GBD 2021数据,该数据取决于生命登记系统的质量,特别是在数据质量有限的国家。GBD顶点出版物中详细介绍了解决生命登记系统中缺失或不可靠数据的方法,特别是在低sdi地区;然而,由于缺乏原始数据bb0,不可能进行敏感性分析来评估代入方法的稳健性。GBD也没有提供其他的建模选择。其次,由于方法学的限制,我们无法量化基于特定亚型的负担,例如代谢功能障碍和酒精相关肝脏疾病(MetALD)或肝内胆管癌的上升趋势。第三,老年人被定义为70岁以上的GBD预定义年龄组,其他截止值无法评估。第四,GBD没有提供替代的建模方法或详细的原始数据,如均方根误差或样本外精度。第五,我们的研究没有考虑诸如合并症和虚弱等可能影响老年人癌症负担的详细因素。衰老是一个普遍的过程,但
{"title":"Older adults living with gastrointestinal cancers in 2021","authors":"Pojsakorn Danpanichkul,&nbsp;Yanfang Pang,&nbsp;Torlap Inkongngam,&nbsp;Kornnatthanai Namsathimaphorn,&nbsp;Krittameth Rakwong,&nbsp;Chuthathip Kaeosri,&nbsp;Benjamin Nah,&nbsp;Kwanjit Duangsonk,&nbsp;Nicole Shu Ying Tang,&nbsp;Neha Mittal,&nbsp;Donghee Kim,&nbsp;Mazen Noureddin,&nbsp;Michael B. Wallace,&nbsp;Amit G. Singal,&nbsp;Karn Wijarnpreecha,&nbsp;Ju Dong Yang","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70014","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The global average life expectancy is projected to rise to 80 years by 2040 [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Since cancer is closely linked to aging, its prevalence is expected to grow as the population ages. Advancements in cancer diagnosis and treatment have led to an increasing number of cancer survivors. In a 2021 consensus statement, the International Society for Geriatric Oncology updated its top priorities for improving care for older cancer patients [&lt;span&gt;2, 3&lt;/span&gt;]. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, there were over four million deaths from gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in 2021 [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The aging population, advancements in cancer management, and shifting risk factors are undoubtedly influencing the prevalence of GI cancers in older adults [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;]. While aging has increasingly captured the attention of policymakers and stakeholders, epidemiological data on GI cancers in older adults remains limited. Older patients are also underrepresented in GI-specific clinical trials. This study aimed to estimate the global burden of GI cancers in older adults using the most recent GBD 2021 [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The general methods used for estimating disease burden in the GBD 2021 study, including GI cancer, have been detailed in previous publications [&lt;span&gt;4, 6&lt;/span&gt;]. Briefly, data were sourced from population-based cancer registries, vital registration systems, and verbal autopsy studies (Supplementary Information S1). This GBD database defines older adults as individuals aged 70 and above. The GBD 2021 study utilized the International Classification of Disease-Tenth and Ninth Revision for GI cancers. We assessed the burden of various GI cancers in older adults, including colorectal, esophageal, liver, biliary tract, pancreatic, and gastric cancers. For liver cancer, we further analyzed the burden by five main etiologies: alcohol, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), and other causes. Several statistical methods were applied to ensure data consistency, including misclassification correction, garbage code redistribution, and noise reduction algorithms. Mortality rates were evaluated using the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm), which employed Bayesian geospatial regression to account for spatial relationships in the data. The detailed CODEm methodology is listed in Supplementary Information S1. Countries were classified based on their level of development using the sociodemographic index (SDI) (Supplementary Information S2).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) (i.e., years of life lost plus years lost due to disability) estimates were reported with a 95% uncertainty interval (UI), calculated as the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles from a posterior distribution of 1,000 draws. Broader UIs indicate higher uncertainty, typically resulting from limited or lower-quality dat","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"658-662"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143522631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial of bireociclib as monotherapy for heavily pretreated HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients: BRIGHT-1 trial 一项开放标签、单臂、多中心、bireociclib作为单药治疗重度预处理的hr阳性、her2阴性晚期乳腺癌患者的II期试验:BRIGHT-1试验。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70009
Jiayu Wang, Qingyuan Zhang, Tao Sun, Huiping Li, Ying Cheng, Zhongsheng Tong, Huihui Li, Wei Li, Jingfen Wang, Yuee Teng, Xinhong Wu, Jing Cheng, Zhendong Chen, Zhengqiu Zhu, Li Wang, Mingming Liu, Xianghui Duan, Lingmei Xu, Binghe Xu

Background

Bireociclib (XZP-3287) is a novel selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, with a favorable safety profile demonstrated in preclinical and phase I studies. BRIGHT-1 aimed to further explore the efficacy and safety of bireociclib monotherapy in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic, hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2) breast cancer who had progressed on or after prior chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in advanced settings, without previous exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Methods

In this open-label phase II trial, eligible patients received bireociclib 480 mg twice daily (BID) until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), investigator-assessed ORR, disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), safety and the pharmacokinetic properties of bireociclib.

Results

A total of 131 patients were enrolled. At data cutoff (July 31, 2023), the IRC-assessed ORR was 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.1% to 38.4%), with a DCR of 73.3% (95% CI, 64.8% to 80.6%), CBR of 42.0% (95% CI, 33.4% to 50.9%) and a median DoR of 15.2 months (95% CI, 9.5 months to not reached). The median PFS was 11.0 months (95% CI, 7.3 months to 12.9 months) assessed by the IRC, and the median OS was 29.0 months (95% CI, 24.9 months to not reached). The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were diarrhea (93.1%), neutrophil count decreased (87.0%), white blood cell decreased (86.3%), vomiting (78.6%), anemia (72.5%), and platelet count decreased (72.5%). The grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 109 (83.2%) patients. The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were neutrophil count decreased (43.5%), white blood cell decreased (32.8%), hypokalemia (20.6%), and diarrhea (19.1%).

Conclusions

Bireociclib monotherapy at 480 mg BID exhibited promising and sustained clinical activity, with no unexpected and acceptable toxicity in patients with recurrent or metastatic HR+/HER2 breast cancer who had progressed on or after previous therapy.

Bireociclib (XZP-3287)是一种新的选择性细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6 (CDK4/6)抑制剂,在临床前和I期研究中证明了良好的安全性。BRIGHT-1旨在进一步探讨bireociclib单药治疗局部晚期、复发或转移、激素受体阳性和人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)乳腺癌患者的疗效和安全性,这些患者在之前的化疗和内分泌治疗中或之后进展,之前没有接触过CDK4/6抑制剂。方法:在这个开放标签II期试验中,符合条件的患者接受bireociclib 480 mg,每日两次(BID),直到疾病进展或无法忍受的毒性。主要终点是由独立审查委员会(IRC)评估的客观缓解率(ORR)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、研究者评估的ORR、疾病控制率(DCR)、临床获益率(CBR)、缓解持续时间(DoR)、总生存期(OS)、安全性和bireociclib的药代动力学特性。结果:共纳入131例患者。在数据截止日期(2023年7月31日),irc评估的ORR为29.8%(95%可信区间[CI], 22.1%至38.4%),DCR为73.3% (95% CI, 64.8%至80.6%),CBR为42.0% (95% CI, 33.4%至50.9%),DoR中位数为15.2个月(95% CI, 9.5个月至未达到)。IRC评估的中位PFS为11.0个月(95% CI, 7.3个月至12.9个月),中位OS为29.0个月(95% CI, 24.9个月至未达到)。最常见的治疗不良事件(teae)是腹泻(93.1%)、中性粒细胞计数下降(87.0%)、白细胞计数下降(86.3%)、呕吐(78.6%)、贫血(72.5%)和血小板计数下降(72.5%)。≥3级teae发生109例(83.2%)。最常见的≥3级teae是中性粒细胞计数减少(43.5%)、白细胞减少(32.8%)、低钾血症(20.6%)和腹泻(19.1%)。结论:Bireociclib单药治疗480 mg BID显示出有希望和持续的临床活性,对于复发或转移性HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者在既往治疗或治疗后进展无意外和可接受的毒性。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov ID, NCT04539496。
{"title":"An open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial of bireociclib as monotherapy for heavily pretreated HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients: BRIGHT-1 trial","authors":"Jiayu Wang,&nbsp;Qingyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Tao Sun,&nbsp;Huiping Li,&nbsp;Ying Cheng,&nbsp;Zhongsheng Tong,&nbsp;Huihui Li,&nbsp;Wei Li,&nbsp;Jingfen Wang,&nbsp;Yuee Teng,&nbsp;Xinhong Wu,&nbsp;Jing Cheng,&nbsp;Zhendong Chen,&nbsp;Zhengqiu Zhu,&nbsp;Li Wang,&nbsp;Mingming Liu,&nbsp;Xianghui Duan,&nbsp;Lingmei Xu,&nbsp;Binghe Xu","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70009","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Bireociclib (XZP-3287) is a novel selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, with a favorable safety profile demonstrated in preclinical and phase I studies. BRIGHT-1 aimed to further explore the efficacy and safety of bireociclib monotherapy in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic, hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR<sup>+</sup>/HER2<sup>−</sup>) breast cancer who had progressed on or after prior chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in advanced settings, without previous exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this open-label phase II trial, eligible patients received bireociclib 480 mg twice daily (BID) until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), investigator-assessed ORR, disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), safety and the pharmacokinetic properties of bireociclib.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 131 patients were enrolled. At data cutoff (July 31, 2023), the IRC-assessed ORR was 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.1% to 38.4%), with a DCR of 73.3% (95% CI, 64.8% to 80.6%), CBR of 42.0% (95% CI, 33.4% to 50.9%) and a median DoR of 15.2 months (95% CI, 9.5 months to not reached). The median PFS was 11.0 months (95% CI, 7.3 months to 12.9 months) assessed by the IRC, and the median OS was 29.0 months (95% CI, 24.9 months to not reached). The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were diarrhea (93.1%), neutrophil count decreased (87.0%), white blood cell decreased (86.3%), vomiting (78.6%), anemia (72.5%), and platelet count decreased (72.5%). The grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 109 (83.2%) patients. The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were neutrophil count decreased (43.5%), white blood cell decreased (32.8%), hypokalemia (20.6%), and diarrhea (19.1%).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Bireociclib monotherapy at 480 mg BID exhibited promising and sustained clinical activity, with no unexpected and acceptable toxicity in patients with recurrent or metastatic HR<sup>+</sup>/HER2<sup>−</sup> breast cancer who had progressed on or after previous therapy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> ","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"640-653"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143514744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus anlotinib in the treatment of resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A pilot phase II trial 新辅助化疗加安洛替尼治疗可切除的头颈部鳞状细胞癌:一项II期试验。
IF 20.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.70006
Qianting He, Shuojin Huang, Dongxiao Tang, Congyuan Cao, Wanhang Zhou, Rongsong Ling, Jie Chen, Bokai Yun, Xin Zheng, Yanchen Li, Anxun Wang, Demeng Chen

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to be a major global health challenge, with limited survival improvements for patients with locally advanced (LA) or recurrent (R) disease [1]. Anlotinib, a novel orally administered small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed in China, targets a wide range of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) [2]. Our previous studies have also manifested that anlotinib remarkably inhibited the proliferation of HNSCC cells both in vitro and in vivo, and presented promising clinical antitumor efficacy and tolerable safety profile in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) [3, 4]. This prospective trial was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable HNSCC. Additionally, the mechanisms underlying the effects of anlotinib and neoadjuvant chemotherapy on HNSCC were investigated through spatial transcriptomics (STs) and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC).

Between October 2022 and May 2023, 20 resectable HNSCC patients were enrolled (median age, 55; range, 27-73). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics are detailed in Supplementary Tables S1-S2. All patients received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, followed by surgery in 17 and maintenance therapy in 16. No patients were lost to follow-up (study flowchart in Figure 1A). After neoadjuvant therapy, 95.0% (19/20) achieved partial response (PR), and 5.0% (1/20) achieved complete response (CR), with an Objective response rate (ORR) of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.2-100). Figure 1B shows the waterfall plot of tumor size changes. Surgical resection was performed in 17 patients (LA, 12; R, 5) with a 100% R0 resection rate, one patient declined surgery due to financial constraints and the other two did not want to perform surgery as their tumors had almost regressed. Postoperative pathological efficacy (Supplementary Table S3) showed pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) in 7 patients each (41.2%; 95% CI, 18.4-67.1). Among 11 with positive cervical lymph nodes, 6 achieved pCR (54.5%; 95% CI, 23.4-83.3). Imaging and pathological data of patient #14 with CR are shown in Figure 1C-D.

All patients were followed for at least one year. Treatment responses and durations are shown in Figure 1E. By May 15, 2024, 17 out of 20 patients were alive. Of the 3 deaths, 1 patient with LA declined further therapy for financial constraints after neoadjuvant treatment and died a year later, another patient with LA refused maintenance therapy after surgery and died within a year, while one patient with LA died in a traffic accident four months post-radiotherapy. Among the all 20 patients, 5 (4 with LA and 1 with R) experienced local recurrence within 1 year. Of the 17 patients with R0 resection, 4 (3 with LA and 1 with R) had a local recurrence

在FFPE切片上绘制壁龛图,发现肿瘤区域包括壁龛1、4和6,且空间分布明显:除了pCR患者治疗后的样本外,壁龛6主要位于肿瘤周边,壁龛1位于中间上皮区,壁龛4位于前沿。(补充图S2)。利用表达数据(ESTIMATE)分析推断肿瘤、间质和免疫亚结构,与组织学注释密切匹配(补充图S3)。非阴性基质因子分解(NMF)鉴定了11个转录元程序,包括复发部分上皮-间质转化(pEMT)模块(COL17A1、LAMA3和LAMC2)、应激反应基因(S100A9、S100A8和KRT6A)和缺氧反应基因(ENO1、DDIT4和VEGFA;补充图S4A-B其他与CAF相对应的程序(ecm - cas: COL1A1、COL1A2和COL3A1;myo-CAFs: DES, ACTN2和MYH2)和免疫谱系。NMF结果与生态位分类一致(补充图S4C-D)。为了进一步研究治疗效果,我们分析了治疗前后生态位组成。处理后的生态位4和生态位6显著降低(生态位4:23.9% ~ 2.8%;小生境6:13.4%至5.2%),反映出强大的抗肿瘤作用(Supplementary Figure S5A)。相反,生态位3、5、7和8增加了后处理(生态位3:6.9% ~ 16.9%;利基5:7.6% - 13.4%;生态位7:4.7% - 7.3%;利基8:2.1% - 8.3%)。基因集变异分析(GSVA)分析显示,在处理后的样品中,mrna的上调富集于与B细胞受体信号传导、补体作用和适应性免疫反应相关的途径,而mrna的下调与表皮发育和细胞周期调节有关(补充图S5B)。小生境3主要由B细胞和CAFs组成(Supplementary图S1C),位于肿瘤小生境附近(Supplementary图S2),提示与肿瘤细胞相互作用。转录组学分析显示,预处理后的小生境3与细胞外基质(ECM)标记物(如COL7A1和DSP)相关,而处理后的样品显示免疫调节基因和B细胞激活标记物(如IGHG3、IGLC1、SFRP2和SFPR4)上调;补充图S5C)。基因集富集分析(GSEA)证实免疫应答和B细胞介导的免疫基因集在治疗后的生态位3中富集(补充图S5D)。CellChat分析显示,治疗后3号生态位与肿瘤生态位(1、4和6号生态位)之间的通信强度增加(补充图S5E-F)。配体受体对(C3-ITGAX + ITGB2、CCL5-ACKR1和SEMA3C-PLXND1)在治疗后显著上调,提示其在抗肿瘤免疫中的作用(Supplementary Figure S5G)。血流模式显示处理后的信号通路以SEMA3、CCL、ANGPTL和COMPLEMENT为主,而预处理后的信号通路以VEGFA、VISFATIN、NRG和ncWNT为主(Supplementary Figure S5H)。为了描述非pcr样本的关键分子特征,我们手动从残留肿瘤中选择点(补充图S6A),并通过残留肿瘤细胞与其他壁位之间的差异表达基因(DEG)分析确定不敏感的特征评分(补充图S6B-C)。GSEA揭示了氧化磷酸化、MYC靶点、DNA修复和干扰素α反应等通路中富集的上调基因(补充图S6D-E)。使用高维加权基因共表达网络分析(hdWGCNA),我们确定了7个基因模块,其中模块RN4与不敏感评分的正相关性最高(补充图S6F-H)。基于python的单细胞调节网络推断和聚类(PySCENIC)分析显示,在不敏感的生态位中存在差异激活的转录因子(TFs),包括HES1、FOXQ1和FOXA1 (Supplementary Figure S6I)。值得注意的是,FOXQ1在各个数据集中都得到了一致的鉴定,并且与naïve pCR样品相比,FOXQ1在naïve非pCR样品中显著富集,这表明它在肿瘤细胞不敏感中起着关键作用(Supplementary Figure S7A-B)。为了探索不敏感生态位与肿瘤微环境(TME)之间的相互作用,Squidpy分析显示与生态位10呈正相关,主要由肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(tam)和T细胞等免疫细胞组成(补充图S7C)。免疫抑制因子如CCL18在非pcr患者中表达升高,表明复杂的TME相互作用(补充图S7D-E)。CCL18在生态位10中表达较高,在非pcr患者中,CCL18- pitpnm3信号在生态位10和1、4、6之间增加(补充图S7F-G)。 进一步的研究显示,FOXQ1和CCL18的表达在非pcr患者中显著富集,特别是在新辅助治疗后(补充图S8A-B)。CD206+/CCL18+ tam主要位于FOXQ1+肿瘤细胞附近,提示局部免疫抑制相互作用(补充图S8A)。在本研究中,氧化磷酸化和FOXQ1的表达在新辅助治疗后的残余肿瘤细胞中富集。FOXQ1是一种致癌转录因子,通过上调NDUFS1和NDUFV1[8]来促进复合体i相关的氧化磷酸化。CD206+/CCL18+ TAM密度在pCR和非pCR患者之间差异显著,且这些TAM在空间上靠近FOXQ1+肿瘤细胞。CCL18是肿瘤生物学中的关键趋化因子,可诱导调节性T细胞募集和促肿瘤m2样巨噬细胞表型[9]。它还通过其受体PITPNM3[10]通过转移和EMT促进癌症进展。FOXQ1+肿瘤细胞与CD206+/CCL18+ tam之间的相互作用有待进一步研究。综上所述,anlotinib联合TP新辅助治疗在可切除的HNSCC患者中具有较高的临床疗效和良好的安全性。需要进一步的高质量、多中心、双盲、更长随访期的III期随机对照试验来验证anlotinib在更大的HNSCC人群中的潜力。概念:黄烁金、何倩婷、唐东晓、周万航、曹从远、王安勋、陈德萌。方法学:黄朔金、何倩婷、唐东晓、周万航、曹从元。数据分析与策展:黄朔金、周万航、凌荣松、陈杰、云博开。调查验证:黄朔金,何倩婷,唐东晓,周万航,曹从元,郑鑫,李彦辰。资源:陈杰,王安勋,陈德萌。原稿:黄朔金、周万航、王安勋、陈德萌。Writing-review,编辑:王安勋、陈德萌。监管与资金收购:王安勋、陈德萌。作者声明没有利益冲突。国家自然科学基金(No. 82173041, 82372868, 82173362, 81872409, 82304069, 82403184, 823B2079),广州市科技局(No. 2024B03J1384),中国博士后科学基金(No. 2023M734003),广东省自然科学基金(No. 2024A1515012316),广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(No. 2023A1515110475)资助。本研究的伦理、医学和科学方面在启动前由中山大学第一附属医院伦理委员会审查和批准(伦理批准号:[2022]474),并在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2300078009)。
{"title":"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus anlotinib in the treatment of resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A pilot phase II trial","authors":"Qianting He,&nbsp;Shuojin Huang,&nbsp;Dongxiao Tang,&nbsp;Congyuan Cao,&nbsp;Wanhang Zhou,&nbsp;Rongsong Ling,&nbsp;Jie Chen,&nbsp;Bokai Yun,&nbsp;Xin Zheng,&nbsp;Yanchen Li,&nbsp;Anxun Wang,&nbsp;Demeng Chen","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70006","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cac2.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to be a major global health challenge, with limited survival improvements for patients with locally advanced (LA) or recurrent (R) disease [<span>1</span>]. Anlotinib, a novel orally administered small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed in China, targets a wide range of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) [<span>2</span>]. Our previous studies have also manifested that anlotinib remarkably inhibited the proliferation of HNSCC cells both in vitro and in vivo, and presented promising clinical antitumor efficacy and tolerable safety profile in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) [<span>3, 4</span>]. This prospective trial was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable HNSCC. Additionally, the mechanisms underlying the effects of anlotinib and neoadjuvant chemotherapy on HNSCC were investigated through spatial transcriptomics (STs) and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC).</p><p>Between October 2022 and May 2023, 20 resectable HNSCC patients were enrolled (median age, 55; range, 27-73). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics are detailed in Supplementary Tables S1-S2. All patients received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, followed by surgery in 17 and maintenance therapy in 16. No patients were lost to follow-up (study flowchart in Figure 1A). After neoadjuvant therapy, 95.0% (19/20) achieved partial response (PR), and 5.0% (1/20) achieved complete response (CR), with an Objective response rate (ORR) of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.2-100). Figure 1B shows the waterfall plot of tumor size changes. Surgical resection was performed in 17 patients (LA, 12; R, 5) with a 100% R0 resection rate, one patient declined surgery due to financial constraints and the other two did not want to perform surgery as their tumors had almost regressed. Postoperative pathological efficacy (Supplementary Table S3) showed pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) in 7 patients each (41.2%; 95% CI, 18.4-67.1). Among 11 with positive cervical lymph nodes, 6 achieved pCR (54.5%; 95% CI, 23.4-83.3). Imaging and pathological data of patient #14 with CR are shown in Figure 1C-D.</p><p>All patients were followed for at least one year. Treatment responses and durations are shown in Figure 1E. By May 15, 2024, 17 out of 20 patients were alive. Of the 3 deaths, 1 patient with LA declined further therapy for financial constraints after neoadjuvant treatment and died a year later, another patient with LA refused maintenance therapy after surgery and died within a year, while one patient with LA died in a traffic accident four months post-radiotherapy. Among the all 20 patients, 5 (4 with LA and 1 with R) experienced local recurrence within 1 year. Of the 17 patients with R0 resection, 4 (3 with LA and 1 with R) had a local recurrence","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 5","pages":"632-636"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cancer Communications
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1