Pub Date : 2025-12-05eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103674
Erik Alonso, Raúl López-Izquierdo, Emma Bourke-Matas, Michael Eichinger, Carlos Del Pozo Vegas, Bas de Groot, Isabel de la Torre, Begoña Polonio-López, José Luis Martín-Conty, Ancor Sanz-García, Francisco Martín-Rodríguez
Background: Scoring systems have demonstrated their usefulness in predicting short-term mortality when applied by emergency medical services (EMS). However, their implementation should be supported by validation studies using real-world data. This work aims to validate a previously developed modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA) score and conduct external revalidation for its use in prehospital critical care to predict short-term mortality.
Methods: This prospective, observational, multicentre, EMS-based validation and external validation study, was conducted across three EMS systems in Spain (one for validation and two for revalidation). Adults with undifferentiated acute conditions who were transported with high priority to the emergency department (ED), excluding pregnancy, cardiac arrest, and palliative patients. The primary outcome was 2-day all-cause in-hospital mortality. Prehospital and in-hospital demographic data, vital signs, and point-of-care testing variables were collected to calculate mSOFA and SOFA scores. Score performance was evaluated through validation/revalidation and a random quasi-stratified K-fold cross-validation scheme.
Findings: Between January 1, 2021, and March 30, 2025, a total of 12,212 patients were enrolled (validation cohort#1 (n = 9063), revalidation cohort#2 (n = 1816), and revalidation cohort#3 (n = 1333)). The median age was 67 years (IQR: 51-80), and 41.1% (5040 patients) were female. The overall 2-day mortality rate was 5% (609 cases). The mSOFA score showed an AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.939-0.958) in the validation cohort, and 0.939 (95% CI: 0.925-0.954) and 0.944 (95% CI: 0.921-0.967) in the two revalidation cohorts. Comparison between mSOFA and SOFA scores for 2-day mortality revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001), with AUCs of 0.947 (95% CI: 0.939-0.954) for mSOFA and 0.927 (95% CI: 0.917-0.937) for SOFA.
Interpretation: Our findings suggest that the mSOFA score shows good discriminatory power for predicting short-term mortality, consistent across different cohorts. Study limitations included not blinded extractors, time limit of primary outcome, and patients' heterogeneity. This validates score performance in other health systems and demonstrates a better mSOFA performance over the SOFA score. Future work will pursue clinical validation of the score via a randomized clinical trial.
Funding: This work was supported by the Institute of Health Carlos III, co-financed by the European Union, by the Basque Government, and by the University of the Basque Country.
{"title":"Performance of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in pre-hospital critical care to predict short-term mortality: a prospective, multicentre, validation cohort study.","authors":"Erik Alonso, Raúl López-Izquierdo, Emma Bourke-Matas, Michael Eichinger, Carlos Del Pozo Vegas, Bas de Groot, Isabel de la Torre, Begoña Polonio-López, José Luis Martín-Conty, Ancor Sanz-García, Francisco Martín-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103674","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scoring systems have demonstrated their usefulness in predicting short-term mortality when applied by emergency medical services (EMS). However, their implementation should be supported by validation studies using real-world data. This work aims to validate a previously developed modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA) score and conduct external revalidation for its use in prehospital critical care to predict short-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational, multicentre, EMS-based validation and external validation study, was conducted across three EMS systems in Spain (one for validation and two for revalidation). Adults with undifferentiated acute conditions who were transported with high priority to the emergency department (ED), excluding pregnancy, cardiac arrest, and palliative patients. The primary outcome was 2-day all-cause in-hospital mortality. Prehospital and in-hospital demographic data, vital signs, and point-of-care testing variables were collected to calculate mSOFA and SOFA scores. Score performance was evaluated through validation/revalidation and a random quasi-stratified K-fold cross-validation scheme.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between January 1, 2021, and March 30, 2025, a total of 12,212 patients were enrolled (validation cohort#1 (n = 9063), revalidation cohort#2 (n = 1816), and revalidation cohort#3 (n = 1333)). The median age was 67 years (IQR: 51-80), and 41.1% (5040 patients) were female. The overall 2-day mortality rate was 5% (609 cases). The mSOFA score showed an AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.939-0.958) in the validation cohort, and 0.939 (95% CI: 0.925-0.954) and 0.944 (95% CI: 0.921-0.967) in the two revalidation cohorts. Comparison between mSOFA and SOFA scores for 2-day mortality revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001), with AUCs of 0.947 (95% CI: 0.939-0.954) for mSOFA and 0.927 (95% CI: 0.917-0.937) for SOFA.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings suggest that the mSOFA score shows good discriminatory power for predicting short-term mortality, consistent across different cohorts. Study limitations included not blinded extractors, time limit of primary outcome, and patients' heterogeneity. This validates score performance in other health systems and demonstrates a better mSOFA performance over the SOFA score. Future work will pursue clinical validation of the score via a randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by the Institute of Health Carlos III, co-financed by the European Union, by the Basque Government, and by the University of the Basque Country.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103674"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12721286/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103692
Nadav Liam Modlin, Victoria Williamson, Guy M Goodwin, Ekaterina Malievskaia, Merve Atli, Zsofia Elek, Alice Gaillard, Don Koelpin, Anthony Cleare, Manish Agrawal, Rachel Yehuda, Namik Kirlic, James Rucker
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating condition leading to significant personal and societal burden. Standard treatments frequently demonstrate limited efficacy, leading to persistent symptoms and high dropout rates. Psilocybin has shown promise in treating depression, a condition that is often comorbid with PTSD. We aimed to explore participant experiences of psilocybin treatment for PTSD, emphasising the role of monitoring and support for safety, direct and indirect engagement with trauma-related material during psilocybin treatment, and differences between psilocybin and standard treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was nested within a quantitative, open-label phase 2 trial assessing the safety and tolerability of COMP360 psilocybin in adults with PTSD. Eligible participants were adults (18 years or older) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for PTSD secondary to a traumatic event experienced in adulthood. Recruitment was conducted at three sites across two countries: two in the United States and one in the United Kingdom. Enrolled participants underwent standardised preparation, a single psilocybin administration session, and follow-up integration sessions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted before, the day after, and 12 weeks post-treatment. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, which is a distinct and theoretically grounded approach to co-construction of recurring themes pertaining to participants' preparedness for treatment, how participants' index trauma presented during treatment, and how psilocybin compared to standard treatments. The quantitative phase 2 trial, which the present qualitative study is nested within, is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05312151.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between June 10, 2022, and Feb 12, 2024, 21 participants were enrolled and participated in this qualitative sub-study and completed the in-person qualitative interviews. The analysis revealed four core themes: (1) non-pharmacological factors for psychological safety and trust, (2) the experiential nature of psilocybin treatment, (3) engagement with trauma-related material during psilocybin treatment, and (4) comparative reflections on prior therapies and psilocybin treatment. Emphasising safety, treatment education, and informed consent, the treatment facilitated an experience of both direct and indirect engagement with trauma-related material during psilocybin treatment. Unlike standard treatments requiring direct confrontation with trauma memories, psilocybin appears to enable a broader, indirect engagement with traumatic material via a range of affective, somatic and self-transcendent experiences (e.g., moments of perceived unity, dissolution of self, or felt connection with a larger whole).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our qualitative findings suggests that ps
{"title":"Investigational psilocybin treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder: a qualitative study of participant experience, trauma engagement, and differences from standard treatment.","authors":"Nadav Liam Modlin, Victoria Williamson, Guy M Goodwin, Ekaterina Malievskaia, Merve Atli, Zsofia Elek, Alice Gaillard, Don Koelpin, Anthony Cleare, Manish Agrawal, Rachel Yehuda, Namik Kirlic, James Rucker","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103692","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating condition leading to significant personal and societal burden. Standard treatments frequently demonstrate limited efficacy, leading to persistent symptoms and high dropout rates. Psilocybin has shown promise in treating depression, a condition that is often comorbid with PTSD. We aimed to explore participant experiences of psilocybin treatment for PTSD, emphasising the role of monitoring and support for safety, direct and indirect engagement with trauma-related material during psilocybin treatment, and differences between psilocybin and standard treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was nested within a quantitative, open-label phase 2 trial assessing the safety and tolerability of COMP360 psilocybin in adults with PTSD. Eligible participants were adults (18 years or older) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for PTSD secondary to a traumatic event experienced in adulthood. Recruitment was conducted at three sites across two countries: two in the United States and one in the United Kingdom. Enrolled participants underwent standardised preparation, a single psilocybin administration session, and follow-up integration sessions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted before, the day after, and 12 weeks post-treatment. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, which is a distinct and theoretically grounded approach to co-construction of recurring themes pertaining to participants' preparedness for treatment, how participants' index trauma presented during treatment, and how psilocybin compared to standard treatments. The quantitative phase 2 trial, which the present qualitative study is nested within, is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05312151.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between June 10, 2022, and Feb 12, 2024, 21 participants were enrolled and participated in this qualitative sub-study and completed the in-person qualitative interviews. The analysis revealed four core themes: (1) non-pharmacological factors for psychological safety and trust, (2) the experiential nature of psilocybin treatment, (3) engagement with trauma-related material during psilocybin treatment, and (4) comparative reflections on prior therapies and psilocybin treatment. Emphasising safety, treatment education, and informed consent, the treatment facilitated an experience of both direct and indirect engagement with trauma-related material during psilocybin treatment. Unlike standard treatments requiring direct confrontation with trauma memories, psilocybin appears to enable a broader, indirect engagement with traumatic material via a range of affective, somatic and self-transcendent experiences (e.g., moments of perceived unity, dissolution of self, or felt connection with a larger whole).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our qualitative findings suggests that ps","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103692"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766423/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103691
Xue Feng, Lei Sun, Jintao Zhu, Xuan Yao, Zhongheng Zhang, Qing Pan, Luping Fang, Gangmin Ning
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a heterogeneous syndrome with varying degrees of multi-organ dysfunction. Identifying dynamic inter-organ interactions is critical for accurate sepsis subphenotyping and targeted therapy, yet remains unexplored. In this study, we aimed to quantify the dynamic trajectories of organ interactions to define sepsis phenotypes, supporting personalized treatment and clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We proposed a novel deep temporal graph clustering model to identify sepsis phenotypes by quantifying dynamic multi-organ interactions within 48 h post-diagnosis. The model was trained and validated on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) dataset (admissions from 2001 to 2012) and externally validated on the eICU Collaborative Research (eICU) dataset (admissions from 2014 to 2015). Its effectiveness was benchmarked against state-of-the-art clustering algorithms. Patient characteristics, multi-organ system states coupling patterns, and prognostic outcomes were compared across the identified phenotypes. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was used for early phenotype classification at 4 h post-diagnosis. To enhance clinical applicability, a user-friendly web interface was developed. Propensity score matching and weighted logistic regression were employed to evaluate the effects of the fluid management strategies on in-hospital mortality of patients with various phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 10,181 and 6208 unique sepsis patients were employed as the cohorts for the model development and external validation, respectively. Three distinct phenotypes were identified and labeled as Phenotype A, B, and C, exhibiting significant differences in baseline characteristics, organ system states coupling patterns, and outcomes (P-value < 0.05). Phenotype A had the lowest mortality (5.59%) and accounted for the largest proportion of patients (46.34%). In contrast, Phenotype C represented the highest mortality (38.27%) and comprised the smallest proportion (22.78%). Phenotype A was characterized by sustained synchronous improvement across organ system states. Phenotype B showed persistent decoupling of organ system states. Phenotype C exhibited a rapid transition from early asynchrony to synchronization. The model demonstrated robust clustering performance in external validation. The simplified classifier showed high predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.84 (95% CI [0.83, 0.86]) for phenotype prediction at 4 h post-diagnosis. The beneficial fluid management strategies varied across different phenotypes, highlighting the need for targeted fluid intervals.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study characterizes sepsis phenotypes using organ interaction trajectories and identifies three heterogeneous patterns of disease progression. These patterns offer new insights into the underlying pa
{"title":"Subphenotyping sepsis based on organ interaction trajectory using a deep temporal graph clustering model: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Xue Feng, Lei Sun, Jintao Zhu, Xuan Yao, Zhongheng Zhang, Qing Pan, Luping Fang, Gangmin Ning","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103691","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103691","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a heterogeneous syndrome with varying degrees of multi-organ dysfunction. Identifying dynamic inter-organ interactions is critical for accurate sepsis subphenotyping and targeted therapy, yet remains unexplored. In this study, we aimed to quantify the dynamic trajectories of organ interactions to define sepsis phenotypes, supporting personalized treatment and clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We proposed a novel deep temporal graph clustering model to identify sepsis phenotypes by quantifying dynamic multi-organ interactions within 48 h post-diagnosis. The model was trained and validated on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) dataset (admissions from 2001 to 2012) and externally validated on the eICU Collaborative Research (eICU) dataset (admissions from 2014 to 2015). Its effectiveness was benchmarked against state-of-the-art clustering algorithms. Patient characteristics, multi-organ system states coupling patterns, and prognostic outcomes were compared across the identified phenotypes. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was used for early phenotype classification at 4 h post-diagnosis. To enhance clinical applicability, a user-friendly web interface was developed. Propensity score matching and weighted logistic regression were employed to evaluate the effects of the fluid management strategies on in-hospital mortality of patients with various phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 10,181 and 6208 unique sepsis patients were employed as the cohorts for the model development and external validation, respectively. Three distinct phenotypes were identified and labeled as Phenotype A, B, and C, exhibiting significant differences in baseline characteristics, organ system states coupling patterns, and outcomes (P-value < 0.05). Phenotype A had the lowest mortality (5.59%) and accounted for the largest proportion of patients (46.34%). In contrast, Phenotype C represented the highest mortality (38.27%) and comprised the smallest proportion (22.78%). Phenotype A was characterized by sustained synchronous improvement across organ system states. Phenotype B showed persistent decoupling of organ system states. Phenotype C exhibited a rapid transition from early asynchrony to synchronization. The model demonstrated robust clustering performance in external validation. The simplified classifier showed high predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.84 (95% CI [0.83, 0.86]) for phenotype prediction at 4 h post-diagnosis. The beneficial fluid management strategies varied across different phenotypes, highlighting the need for targeted fluid intervals.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study characterizes sepsis phenotypes using organ interaction trajectories and identifies three heterogeneous patterns of disease progression. These patterns offer new insights into the underlying pa","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103691"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766501/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103694
Yulu Liu, Haoquan Chen, Jiaqi Zhao, Lieji Wang, Zimei Gao, Yuan Peng, Wenhui Ren, Kaining Shi, Sen Zhang, Xiufeng Chen, Chenxin Pang, Manle Yan, Caizhen Feng, Fan Chai, Jin Gao, Xiaoxuan Jia, Shu Wang, Nan Hong, Yi Wang
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrast-enhanced breast MRI, while highly sensitive, faces limitations including complexity, long acquisition times, and reliance on gadolinium-based contrast agents. Noncontrast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) offers an ultrafast alternative, but its diagnostic accuracy has been insufficient for standalone use. We investigated whether a deep learning (DL) model could enable accurate breast cancer diagnosis using only DWI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This four-centre study included 2493 patients with pathologically confirmed breast lesions. A DWI-based model (DWI-DL) was developed using data from 1286 patients at Peking University People's Hospital (PKUPH; January 2015 to July 2021), who were randomly divided into three cohorts at a ratio of 6:2:2 (train n = 774, validation n = 256, test n = 256). Independent testing used three external cohorts (n = 661) and a prospective cohort from PKUPH that was retrospectively analysed (n = 546; August 2021 to September 2022). The diagnostic performance of DWI-DL model was compared to that of an abbreviated enhanced-based (AE-DL) model and two expert radiologists. Subgroup analysis assessed performance across external and prospective cohorts. A multireader multicase validation, using DW-DL model and selective contrast-enhanced workflow, was conducted by 12 radiologists from ten institutions to evaluate the clinical utility of DWI-DL in assisting diagnosis. Performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics. The multireader multicase study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500095953).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>DWI-DL model demonstrated diagnostic performance across all cohorts that was comparable to the AE-DL model (AUC: 0.771-0.912 vs. 0.780-0.898, p = 0.36-0.98). DWI-DL outperformed two expert radiologists interpreting DWI alone (AUC: 0.781-0.858 vs. 0.714-0.770, p range <0.0001-0.023). In the multireader multicase validation, the AI-guided selective sequence protocol was non-inferior to the full protocol (Protocol E vs. C, AUC: 0.834 [95% CI: 0.785, 0.883] vs. 0.835 [95% CI: 0.789, 0.881], difference: -0.001 [95% CI: -0.029, 0.027], p = 0.94), while simultaneously reduced interpretation time by 55.5% (Protocol E vs. C, mean time: 59.6 [43.5] vs. 134.0 [72.4] seconds, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A DL model using only non-contrast DWI can accurately diagnose breast cancer. The DWI-DL model demonstrated robust performance, comparable to the AE-DL model and surpassing human experts in DWI interpretation, while reducing interpretation time. However, its performance was lower than that of expert radiologists interpreting standard breast MRI. By improving diagnostic efficiency without affecting accuracy, our workflow cooperating the DWI-DL model and selective contrast-enhanced sequence presents a promising, rapid, and safe tool with the potential to streamline the clinic
背景:乳腺造影增强MRI虽然高度敏感,但也存在复杂性、采集时间长、依赖钆基造影剂等局限性。非对比弥散加权成像(DWI)提供了一种超快的替代方法,但其诊断准确性不足以单独使用。我们研究了深度学习(DL)模型是否可以仅使用DWI进行准确的乳腺癌诊断。方法:本研究纳入2493例经病理证实的乳腺病变患者。采用2015年1月至2021年7月北京大学人民医院1286例患者的数据,按6:2:2的比例随机分为3个队列(训练n = 774,验证n = 256,检验n = 256),建立基于dwi的模型(DWI-DL)。独立测试使用三个外部队列(n = 661)和一个来自PKUPH的前瞻性队列进行回顾性分析(n = 546; 2021年8月至2022年9月)。将DWI-DL模型的诊断性能与一种简化的增强模型(AE-DL)和两名放射科专家的诊断性能进行比较。亚组分析评估了外部和前瞻性队列的表现。来自10家机构的12名放射科医生使用DW-DL模型和选择性对比增强工作流程进行了多阅读器多病例验证,以评估DWI-DL在辅助诊断方面的临床应用。使用接收器工作特性的曲线下面积(AUC)评估性能。该多阅读器多病例研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2500095953)。结果:DWI-DL模型在所有队列中的诊断性能与AE-DL模型相当(AUC: 0.771-0.912 vs. 0.780-0.898, p = 0.36-0.98)。DWI-DL优于单独使用DWI的两名放射科专家(AUC: 0.781-0.858 vs. 0.714-0.770, p范围)解释:仅使用非对比DWI的DL模型可以准确诊断乳腺癌。DWI- dl模型表现出强大的性能,与AE-DL模型相当,在DWI解释方面超过了人类专家,同时减少了解释时间。然而,它的表现低于专家放射科医生解释标准乳房MRI。通过提高诊断效率而不影响准确性,我们的工作流程与DWI-DL模型和选择性对比增强序列相结合,提供了一种有前途的、快速的、安全的工具,有可能简化乳腺癌的临床诊断。基金资助:国家自然科学基金(82471964)和北京大学人民医院科研发展基金(RDGS2022-10)资助。
{"title":"AI-driven diffusion weighted imaging-based non-contrast protocol for breast cancer diagnosis: a multicentre, multidimensional validation study.","authors":"Yulu Liu, Haoquan Chen, Jiaqi Zhao, Lieji Wang, Zimei Gao, Yuan Peng, Wenhui Ren, Kaining Shi, Sen Zhang, Xiufeng Chen, Chenxin Pang, Manle Yan, Caizhen Feng, Fan Chai, Jin Gao, Xiaoxuan Jia, Shu Wang, Nan Hong, Yi Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103694","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103694","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contrast-enhanced breast MRI, while highly sensitive, faces limitations including complexity, long acquisition times, and reliance on gadolinium-based contrast agents. Noncontrast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) offers an ultrafast alternative, but its diagnostic accuracy has been insufficient for standalone use. We investigated whether a deep learning (DL) model could enable accurate breast cancer diagnosis using only DWI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This four-centre study included 2493 patients with pathologically confirmed breast lesions. A DWI-based model (DWI-DL) was developed using data from 1286 patients at Peking University People's Hospital (PKUPH; January 2015 to July 2021), who were randomly divided into three cohorts at a ratio of 6:2:2 (train n = 774, validation n = 256, test n = 256). Independent testing used three external cohorts (n = 661) and a prospective cohort from PKUPH that was retrospectively analysed (n = 546; August 2021 to September 2022). The diagnostic performance of DWI-DL model was compared to that of an abbreviated enhanced-based (AE-DL) model and two expert radiologists. Subgroup analysis assessed performance across external and prospective cohorts. A multireader multicase validation, using DW-DL model and selective contrast-enhanced workflow, was conducted by 12 radiologists from ten institutions to evaluate the clinical utility of DWI-DL in assisting diagnosis. Performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics. The multireader multicase study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500095953).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>DWI-DL model demonstrated diagnostic performance across all cohorts that was comparable to the AE-DL model (AUC: 0.771-0.912 vs. 0.780-0.898, p = 0.36-0.98). DWI-DL outperformed two expert radiologists interpreting DWI alone (AUC: 0.781-0.858 vs. 0.714-0.770, p range <0.0001-0.023). In the multireader multicase validation, the AI-guided selective sequence protocol was non-inferior to the full protocol (Protocol E vs. C, AUC: 0.834 [95% CI: 0.785, 0.883] vs. 0.835 [95% CI: 0.789, 0.881], difference: -0.001 [95% CI: -0.029, 0.027], p = 0.94), while simultaneously reduced interpretation time by 55.5% (Protocol E vs. C, mean time: 59.6 [43.5] vs. 134.0 [72.4] seconds, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A DL model using only non-contrast DWI can accurately diagnose breast cancer. The DWI-DL model demonstrated robust performance, comparable to the AE-DL model and surpassing human experts in DWI interpretation, while reducing interpretation time. However, its performance was lower than that of expert radiologists interpreting standard breast MRI. By improving diagnostic efficiency without affecting accuracy, our workflow cooperating the DWI-DL model and selective contrast-enhanced sequence presents a promising, rapid, and safe tool with the potential to streamline the clinic","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103694"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766479/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103687
Rok Berlot, Timothy R Nicholson, Livia Asan, Biba Stanton, Thomas A Pollak, Mark J Edwards
Background: Adverse life events and other stressors were central to historical 'Freudian' models of functional neurological disorder (FND), which have been increasingly replaced by more nuanced biopsychosocial models. Studies of the aetiological relevance of stressors have been limited by small sample sizes.
Methods: Retrospective cohort analyses using a large international electronic health records network (TriNetX), including ICD-10 codes, were performed. Between 2015 and 2025, 147,595 individuals were diagnosed with FND. The rates of adverse life events and psychosocial stressors were compared to matched cohorts with migraine and generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) diagnoses. We also investigated associations between FND and the presence of stressors, including the stressor type and whether it occurred in childhood or adulthood.
Findings: Rates of abuse or neglect (1·33%), assault (2·42%), and psychosocial and socioeconomic difficulties (10·63%) were significantly higher in FND compared to migraine (0·42%/0·93%/3·43%, respectively) and GAD (0·75%/1·29%/7·69%, respectively) (p < ·0001 for all comparisons). A history of physical and sexual abuse was more prevalent in FND than in comparison groups. Psychological abuse was more common in FND than in migraine, but not when compared to GAD. FND cases with recorded stressors were younger, more often female, and more frequently diagnosed with functional/dissociative seizures than those without stressors. Further, these stressors were associated with an increased prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities, pain, and fatigue. Different stressor types had distinct influences on clinical presentations. Adult-onset adversity was associated with higher rates of psychiatric comorbidities, pain and fatigue.
Interpretation: A record of adversities was at least 2·5 times more common in FND than in migraine, and about 1·5 times more common than in GAD, varying by stressor type. Psychosocial stressors were particularly common. The presence of stressors, as well as their type, shapes the presentation of FND. Life history should therefore be considered when assessing individuals with FND.
{"title":"Adverse life events and psychosocial stressors in functional neurological disorder: a retrospective cohort and case-control study using a large international electronic health record database.","authors":"Rok Berlot, Timothy R Nicholson, Livia Asan, Biba Stanton, Thomas A Pollak, Mark J Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103687","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103687","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse life events and other stressors were central to historical 'Freudian' models of functional neurological disorder (FND), which have been increasingly replaced by more nuanced biopsychosocial models. Studies of the aetiological relevance of stressors have been limited by small sample sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analyses using a large international electronic health records network (TriNetX), including ICD-10 codes, were performed. Between 2015 and 2025, 147,595 individuals were diagnosed with FND. The rates of adverse life events and psychosocial stressors were compared to matched cohorts with migraine and generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) diagnoses. We also investigated associations between FND and the presence of stressors, including the stressor type and whether it occurred in childhood or adulthood.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Rates of abuse or neglect (1·33%), assault (2·42%), and psychosocial and socioeconomic difficulties (10·63%) were significantly higher in FND compared to migraine (0·42%/0·93%/3·43%, respectively) and GAD (0·75%/1·29%/7·69%, respectively) (<i>p</i> < ·0001 for all comparisons). A history of physical and sexual abuse was more prevalent in FND than in comparison groups. Psychological abuse was more common in FND than in migraine, but not when compared to GAD. FND cases with recorded stressors were younger, more often female, and more frequently diagnosed with functional/dissociative seizures than those without stressors. Further, these stressors were associated with an increased prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities, pain, and fatigue. Different stressor types had distinct influences on clinical presentations. Adult-onset adversity was associated with higher rates of psychiatric comorbidities, pain and fatigue.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A record of adversities was at least 2·5 times more common in FND than in migraine, and about 1·5 times more common than in GAD, varying by stressor type. Psychosocial stressors were particularly common. The presence of stressors, as well as their type, shapes the presentation of FND. Life history should therefore be considered when assessing individuals with FND.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103687"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12720988/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103685
Lorenzo Piemonti, Andrea Mario Bolla, Amelia Caretto, Raffaella Melzi, Alessia Mercalli, Valeria Sordi, Paolo Monti, Paola Magistretti, Vito Lampasona, Ilaria Marzinotto, Paola Maffi, Miriam Ramondetta, Nicoletta Cagni, Erica Pedone, Davide Catarinella, Massimo Cardillo, Rossana Caldara, Emanuele Bosi
Background: Current immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes (T1D) have shown limited success in durably preserving β-cell function. We tested a novel strategy that repurposes allogeneic islet transplantation not for metabolic replacement, but as a platform for antigen-specific immune education.
Methods: In this monocentric, open-label pilot study (April 2015-April 2023), six patients with recent-onset T1D received a minimal islet mass (median 3452 IEQ/kg; range 2980-4050) combined with short-term immunomodulation (ATG, transient mTOR inhibition, and G-CSF). The transplanted islet mass was intentionally insufficient for metabolic replacement. The primary endpoint was the change in stimulated 2-h C-peptide AUC at 52 weeks. Exploratory endpoints included immune cell phenotyping, cytokine/chemokine profiling, miR-375 release kinetics, analysis of islet-related autoantibodies, and monitoring of donor-specific HLA antibodies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02505893.
Findings: The protocol was safe and well-tolerated. At 12 months, the median stimulated C-peptide AUC was preserved at 91-100% of baseline with all participants achieving a partial clinical remission (IDAA1c ≤ 9). At 5 years, median C-peptide AUC declined to 44-56% of baseline, with 2 patients maintaining stable secretion and 2 retaining ∼50% of initial function. Exploratory analyses demonstrated a structured pattern of immune resetting, with early lymphodepletion followed by memory and regulatory T-cell expansion; transient increases in IL-2 and IL-10; sustained early elevation of sCD25; biphasic miR-375 peaks indicating early β-cell stress; transient increases in autoantibodies without epitope spreading; and donor-specific class I HLA antibodies in five patients, with persistent class II DSA in two. No expansion of CD3+CD8+ T cells specific for GAD65 was detected.
Interpretation: This study introduces a paradigm shift in the use of islet transplantation-transforming it from a metabolic intervention into a tolerogenic stimulus through controlled antigen exposure. Further potentiation with stem-cell-derived islets may enable improved matching, graft modification, and iterative antigen delivery.
Funding: Supported by Fondazione Italiana Diabete (FID). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, or decision to publish.
{"title":"Induction of immune education in type 1 diabetes through controlled allogeneic islet rejection at onset: a monocentric open-label pilot study.","authors":"Lorenzo Piemonti, Andrea Mario Bolla, Amelia Caretto, Raffaella Melzi, Alessia Mercalli, Valeria Sordi, Paolo Monti, Paola Magistretti, Vito Lampasona, Ilaria Marzinotto, Paola Maffi, Miriam Ramondetta, Nicoletta Cagni, Erica Pedone, Davide Catarinella, Massimo Cardillo, Rossana Caldara, Emanuele Bosi","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103685","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103685","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes (T1D) have shown limited success in durably preserving β-cell function. We tested a novel strategy that repurposes allogeneic islet transplantation not for metabolic replacement, but as a platform for antigen-specific immune education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this monocentric, open-label pilot study (April 2015-April 2023), six patients with recent-onset T1D received a minimal islet mass (median 3452 IEQ/kg; range 2980-4050) combined with short-term immunomodulation (ATG, transient mTOR inhibition, and G-CSF). The transplanted islet mass was intentionally insufficient for metabolic replacement. The primary endpoint was the change in stimulated 2-h C-peptide AUC at 52 weeks. Exploratory endpoints included immune cell phenotyping, cytokine/chemokine profiling, miR-375 release kinetics, analysis of islet-related autoantibodies, and monitoring of donor-specific HLA antibodies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02505893.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The protocol was safe and well-tolerated. At 12 months, the median stimulated C-peptide AUC was preserved at 91-100% of baseline with all participants achieving a partial clinical remission (IDAA1c ≤ 9). At 5 years, median C-peptide AUC declined to 44-56% of baseline, with 2 patients maintaining stable secretion and 2 retaining ∼50% of initial function. Exploratory analyses demonstrated a structured pattern of immune resetting, with early lymphodepletion followed by memory and regulatory T-cell expansion; transient increases in IL-2 and IL-10; sustained early elevation of sCD25; biphasic miR-375 peaks indicating early β-cell stress; transient increases in autoantibodies without epitope spreading; and donor-specific class I HLA antibodies in five patients, with persistent class II DSA in two. No expansion of CD3<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells specific for GAD65 was detected.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study introduces a paradigm shift in the use of islet transplantation-transforming it from a metabolic intervention into a tolerogenic stimulus through controlled antigen exposure. Further potentiation with stem-cell-derived islets may enable improved matching, graft modification, and iterative antigen delivery.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Supported by Fondazione Italiana Diabete (FID). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, or decision to publish.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103685"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12720987/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103682
David A Jolliffe, Nicklas Brustad, Bo Chawes, Cyrus Cooper, Stefania D'angelo, Nicholas C Harvey, Augusto A Litonjua, Rebecca Moon, Shaun K Morris, John D Sluyter, Scott T Weiss, Adrian R Martineau
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are a leading cause of mortality in infants. Vitamin D supports innate antimicrobial effector mechanisms in leucocytes and respiratory epithelium. Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has been proposed as a preventive strategy, however, an up-to-date synthesis of available data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has not been conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from RCTs of maternal vitamin D supplementation for prevention of ARIs in offspring. Data were analysed using a random-effects model. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and the ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception to 5th August 2025. No language restrictions were imposed. Double-blind RCTs of maternal vitamin D supplementation, with placebo or lower-dose vitamin D control, were eligible if approved by Research Ethics Committee and if ARI incidence in offspring was collected prospectively and pre-specified as an efficacy outcome. Sub-group analyses were done to determine whether effects of maternal vitamin D supplementation on offspring ARI risk varied according to maternal baseline circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25 [OH]D) concentrations (<25 nmol/L, 25-49.9 nmol/L, 50-74.9 nmol/L, or ≥75 nmol/L). The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024527191.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our search identified 405 unique studies, of which 4 RCTs (3678 participants) were eligible and included. For the primary comparison of any maternal vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo, the intervention did not significantly affect overall ARI risk in offspring (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.03, P = 0.66; 4 studies; I<sup>2</sup> 14.5%, absolute effects from GRADE assessment: 0.05 higher rate in vitamin D arm; moderate quality finding). Pre-specified subgroup analysis did not reveal evidence of effect modification by maternal baseline vitamin D status: <25 nmol/L group: IRR 1.12, 95% CI 0.98-1.27 (607 participants in 4 studies, I<sup>2</sup> 47.8%) vs. 25-49.9 nmol/L group: IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.13 (1154 participants in 4 studies, I<sup>2</sup> 68.5%) vs. 50-74.9 nmol/L group: IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93-1.08 (789 participants in 4 studies, I<sup>2</sup> 64.9%) vs. ≥75 nmol/L group: IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.06 (505 participants in 4 studies, I<sup>2</sup> 47.6%). A funnel plot did not indicate the presence of publication bias or small-study effects (P = 0.71, Egger's test).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our analysis of current data does not support routine antenatal vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of ARI in offspring. Key limitations of the study were the administration of a low dose vitamin D standard-of-care in some populations which may have attenuated effects of the intervention, and heterogeneity in ARI case definitions which may have introd
背景:急性呼吸道感染(ARIs)是婴儿死亡的主要原因。维生素D支持先天抗菌效应机制在白细胞和呼吸上皮。孕妇在怀孕期间补充维生素D已被建议作为一种预防策略,然而,尚未进行随机对照试验(rct)中可用数据的最新综合。方法:我们对母体补充维生素D预防后代ARIs的随机对照试验的总体数据进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据采用随机效应模型进行分析。从数据库建立到2025年8月5日,我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Web of Science和ClinicalTrials.gov。没有施加语言限制。如果获得研究伦理委员会的批准,并且前瞻性地收集后代的ARI发病率,并预先指定作为疗效结果,则母体补充维生素D与安慰剂或低剂量维生素D对照的双盲随机对照试验符合条件。我们进行了亚组分析,以确定母亲补充维生素D对后代ARI风险的影响是否会根据母亲基线循环25-羟基维生素D (25 [OH]D)浓度而变化(研究结果:我们的搜索确定了405项独特的研究,其中4项随机对照试验(3678名参与者)符合条件并被纳入。对于任何母体补充维生素D与安慰剂的初步比较,干预没有显著影响后代的总体ARI风险(发病率比[IRR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.03, P = 0.66; 4项研究;I2 14.5%, GRADE评估的绝对效果:维生素D组的发生率高0.05;中等质量发现)。预先指定的亚组分析没有显示母体基线维生素D水平改变效果的证据:2 47.8%)vs. 25-49.9 nmol/L组:IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.13(4项研究1154名参与者,I2 68.5%) vs. 50-74.9 nmol/L组:IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93-1.08(4项研究789名参与者,I2 64.9%) vs.≥75 nmol/L组:IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.06(4项研究505名参与者,I2 47.6%)。漏斗图未显示存在发表偏倚或小研究效应(P = 0.71, Egger检验)。解释:我们对当前数据的分析不支持常规产前补充维生素D预防后代ARI。该研究的主要局限性是在一些人群中使用低剂量维生素D标准治疗,这可能会减弱干预的效果,以及ARI病例定义的异质性,这可能会导致误分类偏倚。缺乏人群的靶向补充可能需要进一步的研究。资金:没有。
{"title":"Association between maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and the risk of acute respiratory infections in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"David A Jolliffe, Nicklas Brustad, Bo Chawes, Cyrus Cooper, Stefania D'angelo, Nicholas C Harvey, Augusto A Litonjua, Rebecca Moon, Shaun K Morris, John D Sluyter, Scott T Weiss, Adrian R Martineau","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103682","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are a leading cause of mortality in infants. Vitamin D supports innate antimicrobial effector mechanisms in leucocytes and respiratory epithelium. Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy has been proposed as a preventive strategy, however, an up-to-date synthesis of available data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has not been conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from RCTs of maternal vitamin D supplementation for prevention of ARIs in offspring. Data were analysed using a random-effects model. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and the ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception to 5th August 2025. No language restrictions were imposed. Double-blind RCTs of maternal vitamin D supplementation, with placebo or lower-dose vitamin D control, were eligible if approved by Research Ethics Committee and if ARI incidence in offspring was collected prospectively and pre-specified as an efficacy outcome. Sub-group analyses were done to determine whether effects of maternal vitamin D supplementation on offspring ARI risk varied according to maternal baseline circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25 [OH]D) concentrations (<25 nmol/L, 25-49.9 nmol/L, 50-74.9 nmol/L, or ≥75 nmol/L). The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024527191.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our search identified 405 unique studies, of which 4 RCTs (3678 participants) were eligible and included. For the primary comparison of any maternal vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo, the intervention did not significantly affect overall ARI risk in offspring (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.03, P = 0.66; 4 studies; I<sup>2</sup> 14.5%, absolute effects from GRADE assessment: 0.05 higher rate in vitamin D arm; moderate quality finding). Pre-specified subgroup analysis did not reveal evidence of effect modification by maternal baseline vitamin D status: <25 nmol/L group: IRR 1.12, 95% CI 0.98-1.27 (607 participants in 4 studies, I<sup>2</sup> 47.8%) vs. 25-49.9 nmol/L group: IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.13 (1154 participants in 4 studies, I<sup>2</sup> 68.5%) vs. 50-74.9 nmol/L group: IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93-1.08 (789 participants in 4 studies, I<sup>2</sup> 64.9%) vs. ≥75 nmol/L group: IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.06 (505 participants in 4 studies, I<sup>2</sup> 47.6%). A funnel plot did not indicate the presence of publication bias or small-study effects (P = 0.71, Egger's test).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our analysis of current data does not support routine antenatal vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of ARI in offspring. Key limitations of the study were the administration of a low dose vitamin D standard-of-care in some populations which may have attenuated effects of the intervention, and heterogeneity in ARI case definitions which may have introd","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103682"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12720986/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The development of fractional-dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine (fIPV, a fifth of a full IPV dose) has provided a dose-stretching, less costly, and immunogenic alternative to full dose IPV, enhancing global IPV introduction and accessibility. fIPV is administered intradermally, however, intradermal injection is considered difficult and requires skilled administration. This study aimed at assessing the non-inferiority of intramuscular versus intradermal administration of fIPV in young infants in Maputo, Mozambique.
Methods: This was an open label, randomized, non-inferiority trial conducted between 2020 and 2022 (Ref. NCT04027036). Healthy IPV-naive infants attending routine immunization services were enrolled in the study and block randomized to receive two sequential doses of fIPV (0.1 mL), either intramuscularly or intradermally, at two and four months of age. Blood samples were collected at four timepoints: baseline, two months after the first dose, one week after the second dose, and one month after the second dose. Samples were analyzed via microneutralization assays against all three poliovirus serotypes. The primary endpoint was defined as cumulative seroconversion rates to type 2 poliovirus after administration of two doses of intramuscular versus intradermal fIPV. The study has been completed, and data analyzed per protocol.
Findings: 382 infants (49.5% [189/382] female) were enrolled in the study between 12 August 2020 and 31 May 2022. Cumulative type 2 seroconversion after two fIPV doses reached 92.1% (139/151, 95% CI 86.5-95.8) in the intradermal group and 96.1% (148/154, 95% CI 91.7-98.6) in the intramuscular group (=0.15). The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections, not related to the study vaccine. 12 serious adverse events occurred in the study, none were considered to be related to the study vaccines.
Interpretation: This is the second study demonstrating non-inferiority of fIPV administered intramuscularly compared with intradermally; and the first study assessing immunogenicity in young infants. The results informed vaccine policymaking, leading to a recent recommendation from the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization from WHO on intramuscular administration of fIPV in outbreak response.
Funding: World Health Organization.
背景:部分剂量灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(fIPV,完全IPV剂量的五分之一)的发展为完全剂量IPV提供了一种剂量延伸、成本较低和免疫原性的替代方案,加强了全球IPV的引入和可及性。fIPV是皮内给药,然而皮内注射被认为是困难的,需要熟练的给药。本研究旨在评估在莫桑比克马普托的婴儿中肌肉注射与皮内注射fIPV的非劣效性。方法:这是一项开放标签、随机、非劣效性试验,于2020年至2022年进行(参考编号:NCT04027036)。参加常规免疫服务的健康初生ipvv婴儿被纳入研究,并随机分组接受两个顺序剂量的fIPV (0.1 mL),分别在2个月和4个月大时肌肉注射或皮内注射。在四个时间点采集血样:基线、第一次给药后两个月、第二次给药后一周和第二次给药后一个月。通过针对所有三种脊髓灰质炎病毒血清型的微量中和试验对样品进行分析。主要终点被定义为肌肉注射和皮内注射两剂fIPV后到2型脊髓灰质炎病毒的累积血清转化率。研究已完成,并按方案对数据进行了分析。研究结果:在2020年8月12日至2022年5月31日期间,382名婴儿(49.5%[189/382]名女性)入组研究。两次fIPV剂量后累积2型血清转化在皮内组达到92.1% (139/151,95% CI 86.5-95.8),在肌内组达到96.1% (148/154,95% CI 91.7-98.6)(=0.15)。最常见的不良事件是上呼吸道感染,与研究疫苗无关。研究中发生了12起严重不良事件,没有一起被认为与研究疫苗有关。解释:这是第二项证明肌肉内注射fIPV与皮内注射相比无劣效性的研究;也是第一个评估婴儿免疫原性的研究。这些结果为疫苗决策提供了信息,导致世卫组织免疫战略咨询专家组最近提出了关于在疫情应对中肌肉注射fIPV的建议。资助:世界卫生组织。
{"title":"Intramuscular versus intradermal administration of fractional dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine in Mozambique, 2020-2022: an, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.","authors":"Edna Omar Viegas, Emilia Fumane, Kassia Pereira, Mahira Amade, Ilesh Jani, Onélia Guilche, Catildo Cubai, Sandra Valdez, Bernardo A Mainou, Rocio Lopez Cavestany, Visalakshi Jeyaseelan, Ondrej Mach","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103659","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103659","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of fractional-dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine (fIPV, a fifth of a full IPV dose) has provided a dose-stretching, less costly, and immunogenic alternative to full dose IPV, enhancing global IPV introduction and accessibility. fIPV is administered intradermally, however, intradermal injection is considered difficult and requires skilled administration. This study aimed at assessing the non-inferiority of intramuscular versus intradermal administration of fIPV in young infants in Maputo, Mozambique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an open label, randomized, non-inferiority trial conducted between 2020 and 2022 (Ref. NCT04027036). Healthy IPV-naive infants attending routine immunization services were enrolled in the study and block randomized to receive two sequential doses of fIPV (0.1 mL), either intramuscularly or intradermally, at two and four months of age. Blood samples were collected at four timepoints: baseline, two months after the first dose, one week after the second dose, and one month after the second dose. Samples were analyzed via microneutralization assays against all three poliovirus serotypes. The primary endpoint was defined as cumulative seroconversion rates to type 2 poliovirus after administration of two doses of intramuscular versus intradermal fIPV. The study has been completed, and data analyzed per protocol.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>382 infants (49.5% [189/382] female) were enrolled in the study between 12 August 2020 and 31 May 2022. Cumulative type 2 seroconversion after two fIPV doses reached 92.1% (139/151, 95% CI 86.5-95.8) in the intradermal group and 96.1% (148/154, 95% CI 91.7-98.6) in the intramuscular group (=0.15). The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections, not related to the study vaccine. 12 serious adverse events occurred in the study, none were considered to be related to the study vaccines.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This is the second study demonstrating non-inferiority of fIPV administered intramuscularly compared with intradermally; and the first study assessing immunogenicity in young infants. The results informed vaccine policymaking, leading to a recent recommendation from the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization from WHO on intramuscular administration of fIPV in outbreak response.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>World Health Organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103659"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12719737/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-03eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103681
Cees-Jan Oostwouder, Karin Vos, Ivo J Lutke Schipholt, Mathijs R Merkus, Thomas Telders, David F A van Deursen, Max B de Smit, Marina D van Eijk, Hetty J Bontkes, Femke H Bouwman, Rob C I Wüst, Lara de Jong, Marinus van Hulst, Jos W R Twisk, Coenraad K van Kalken, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters
Background: Post-COVID involves persistent, multisystem symptoms which are associated with inflammation, immune dysregulation, and autonomic dysfunction. The effects of currently applied treatments for post-COVID are limited. This study assessed the effectiveness of subcutaneous lidocaine-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) for the treatment of post-COVID.
Methods: This interrupted time series study was conducted at a Dutch outpatient clinic between August 2024 and April 2025. Adults with physician-diagnosed post-COVID (n = 103) underwent a 4-week pre-treatment observation followed by 24-36 weeks of home-based subcutaneous lidocaine 5% with HP-β-CD, administered using a 3-phase protocol: 500 mg every other day (weeks 1-7), 500 mg daily (weeks 7-14), and up to 1000 mg/day (after week 14, in non-responders). The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (Short Form-12 (SF-12), physical and mental component summary scores). Secondary outcomes included symptom burden (daily app-based questionnaire) and adverse events.
Findings: Among 103 participants (mean [SD] age 48·1 [13·0] years; 67% women; median [IQR] symptom duration 31·5 [24·3-43·3] months), 76% completed 24 weeks and 71% completed 36 weeks of treatment. At week 24, the physical and mental component scores increased by 2·20 and 5·16 points, respectively; at week 36, by 4·13 and 7·00 points (all p < 0·0001). Twenty-seven of 30 symptoms improved significantly at week 24 of treatment compared to pre-treatment. Mild adverse events occurred in 89% of participants, mostly injection-site reactions; no serious adverse events were reported.
Interpretation: Subcutaneous lidocaine-HP-β-CD was associated with significantly improved quality of life and symptom burden in patients with post-COVID. This home-administered intervention offers a scalable and potentially disease-modifying approach for a disabling condition with no approved treatment to date.
Funding: Excellent Care Clinics funded the treatment provided in this study.
{"title":"Effect of subcutaneous lidocaine-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) on quality of life in patients with post-COVID condition: a 36-week observational interrupted time series study.","authors":"Cees-Jan Oostwouder, Karin Vos, Ivo J Lutke Schipholt, Mathijs R Merkus, Thomas Telders, David F A van Deursen, Max B de Smit, Marina D van Eijk, Hetty J Bontkes, Femke H Bouwman, Rob C I Wüst, Lara de Jong, Marinus van Hulst, Jos W R Twisk, Coenraad K van Kalken, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103681","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103681","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-COVID involves persistent, multisystem symptoms which are associated with inflammation, immune dysregulation, and autonomic dysfunction. The effects of currently applied treatments for post-COVID are limited. This study assessed the effectiveness of subcutaneous lidocaine-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) for the treatment of post-COVID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interrupted time series study was conducted at a Dutch outpatient clinic between August 2024 and April 2025. Adults with physician-diagnosed post-COVID (n = 103) underwent a 4-week pre-treatment observation followed by 24-36 weeks of home-based subcutaneous lidocaine 5% with HP-β-CD, administered using a 3-phase protocol: 500 mg every other day (weeks 1-7), 500 mg daily (weeks 7-14), and up to 1000 mg/day (after week 14, in non-responders). The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (Short Form-12 (SF-12), physical and mental component summary scores). Secondary outcomes included symptom burden (daily app-based questionnaire) and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 103 participants (mean [SD] age 48·1 [13·0] years; 67% women; median [IQR] symptom duration 31·5 [24·3-43·3] months), 76% completed 24 weeks and 71% completed 36 weeks of treatment. At week 24, the physical and mental component scores increased by 2·20 and 5·16 points, respectively; at week 36, by 4·13 and 7·00 points (all p < 0·0001). Twenty-seven of 30 symptoms improved significantly at week 24 of treatment compared to pre-treatment. Mild adverse events occurred in 89% of participants, mostly injection-site reactions; no serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Subcutaneous lidocaine-HP-β-CD was associated with significantly improved quality of life and symptom burden in patients with post-COVID. This home-administered intervention offers a scalable and potentially disease-modifying approach for a disabling condition with no approved treatment to date.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Excellent Care Clinics funded the treatment provided in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103681"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12719765/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103662
Emine Koc Cakmak, Aline Al Nahas, Bernadette Chimera, Giles Hanley-Cook, Jeroen Berden, Anthony Fardet, Edmond Rock, Carine Biessy, Geneviève Nicolas, Nathalie Kliemann, Fernanda Rauber, Renata Bertazzi Levy, Lorenzo Mangone, Mathilde Touvier, Bernard Srour, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Carl Lachat, Guri Skeie, Elisabete Weiderpass, Franziska Jannasch, Christina C Dahm, Daniel Borch Ibsen, Christina Dahl, Cecilie Kyrø, Mariem Hajji-Louati, Chloé Marques, Gianluca Severi, Verena Katzke, Rudolf Kaaks, Matthias B Schulze, Saverio Caini, Sabina Sieri, Maria Santucci De Magistris, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Raúl Zamora-Ros, Maria-José Sánchez, Ana Jimenez-Zabala, Jesús-Humberto Gómez, Marcela Guevara, Elio Riboli, Marc J Gunter, Inge Huybrechts, Paolo Vineis, Oliver J K Robinson
Background: Diet may modify colorectal cancer risk. We investigated the associations of three dietary patterns, ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption, healthy plant-based food consumption, and food biodiversity, separately and combined into a "3V" score with risk of colorectal cancer.
Methods: This study used data from the prospective European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, which recruited participants between 1992, and 2000, from 23 centres in ten European countries. The 3V score was developed by standardising and summing the healthy plant diet index (hPDI) and dietary species richness per year (DSR) and subtracting UPF (Nova category 4) intake in % g/day. Associations with colorectal cancer risk were assessed among 450,111 middle-aged participants of the EPIC cohort using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. Independent associations of each 3V component were assessed using mutually adjusted models. Data-driven thresholds were applied to assess adherence to the 3V components, set at the minimum value of the fourth quintile for hPDI, DSR and low UPF.
Findings: During mean (standard deviation (SD)) follow-up of 14.9 (4) years, absolute colorectal cancer rates were 8.59 and 10.37 cases/10,000 person-years for the highest and lowest quintiles of the 3V score, respectively. Inverse associations were found for colorectal (hazard ratio (HR) comparing highest vs lowest quintile: 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.94), colon (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.93), and distal colon cancer (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.99), with significant linear trends observed across quintiles. UPF intake was positively associated with colon cancer risk (HR per 1 SD increment: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.11) when mutually adjusted for the other 3V components. Adherence to low UPF, high hPDI, and high DSR was inversely associated with colorectal (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.61-0.88), colon (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.57-0.91), and rectal cancer (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.91) compared to adhering to none.
Interpretation: Adherence to the 3V diet is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancers.
Funding: Cancer Research UK, World Cancer Research Fund.
{"title":"The 3V score and joint associations of low ultra-processed food, biodiverse and plant-based diets on colorectal cancer risk: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study.","authors":"Emine Koc Cakmak, Aline Al Nahas, Bernadette Chimera, Giles Hanley-Cook, Jeroen Berden, Anthony Fardet, Edmond Rock, Carine Biessy, Geneviève Nicolas, Nathalie Kliemann, Fernanda Rauber, Renata Bertazzi Levy, Lorenzo Mangone, Mathilde Touvier, Bernard Srour, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Carl Lachat, Guri Skeie, Elisabete Weiderpass, Franziska Jannasch, Christina C Dahm, Daniel Borch Ibsen, Christina Dahl, Cecilie Kyrø, Mariem Hajji-Louati, Chloé Marques, Gianluca Severi, Verena Katzke, Rudolf Kaaks, Matthias B Schulze, Saverio Caini, Sabina Sieri, Maria Santucci De Magistris, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Raúl Zamora-Ros, Maria-José Sánchez, Ana Jimenez-Zabala, Jesús-Humberto Gómez, Marcela Guevara, Elio Riboli, Marc J Gunter, Inge Huybrechts, Paolo Vineis, Oliver J K Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103662","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103662","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diet may modify colorectal cancer risk. We investigated the associations of three dietary patterns, ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption, healthy plant-based food consumption, and food biodiversity, separately and combined into a \"3V\" score with risk of colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from the prospective European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, which recruited participants between 1992, and 2000, from 23 centres in ten European countries. The 3V score was developed by standardising and summing the healthy plant diet index (hPDI) and dietary species richness per year (DSR) and subtracting UPF (Nova category 4) intake in % g/day. Associations with colorectal cancer risk were assessed among 450,111 middle-aged participants of the EPIC cohort using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. Independent associations of each 3V component were assessed using mutually adjusted models. Data-driven thresholds were applied to assess adherence to the 3V components, set at the minimum value of the fourth quintile for hPDI, DSR and low UPF.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>During mean (standard deviation (SD)) follow-up of 14.9 (4) years, absolute colorectal cancer rates were 8.59 and 10.37 cases/10,000 person-years for the highest and lowest quintiles of the 3V score, respectively. Inverse associations were found for colorectal (hazard ratio (HR) comparing highest vs lowest quintile: 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.94), colon (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.93), and distal colon cancer (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.99), with significant linear trends observed across quintiles. UPF intake was positively associated with colon cancer risk (HR per 1 SD increment: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.11) when mutually adjusted for the other 3V components. Adherence to low UPF, high hPDI, and high DSR was inversely associated with colorectal (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.61-0.88), colon (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.57-0.91), and rectal cancer (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.91) compared to adhering to none.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Adherence to the 3V diet is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancers.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Cancer Research UK, World Cancer Research Fund.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103662"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12719066/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}