Pub Date : 2026-01-14eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103749
Eric Edward Irons, Keri Ann Pfeil, Jaime Abraham Perez, Koen van Besien
Background: Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus are treated with a growing variety of medications targeting multiple metabolic pathways. In recent years, incretins such as the GLP-1 receptor agonists have proven effective in the control of hyperglycemia but also in weight loss, where they are now separately approved as a treatment for obesity. Given the importance of obesity and metabolic syndrome as risk factors for malignancy, the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cancer risk is of increasing interest. Here, we performed an analysis of the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors on cancer risk and mortality.
Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database of electronic health records between 2019 and 2024, including patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Individuals prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, or neither were compared for the incidence of four obesity-related hematologic malignancies using a Cox proportional hazards model. Similar analysis was applied to mortality associated with these medication classes in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the hematologic malignancies under study.
Findings: GLP-1 receptor agonist use is associated with a significantly decreased risk of multiple myeloma (HR 0.64, p = 0.01), but not chronic myeloid leukemia (HR 1.06, p = 0.857), acute myeloid leukemia (HR 0.81, p = 0.354), or myelodysplastic syndrome (HR 0.98, p = 0.996). This effect was preserved in subgroups with BMI >30 and HbA1c >8%. Further, we find that in patients with multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia, SGLT2 inhibitor use is associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality, independent of heart or kidney failure (MM HR 2.27, p < 0.001, AML HR 2.00, p = 0.006).
Interpretation: Our results strengthen the association between metabolic disease and multiple myeloma yet call for prospective investigation into the use of SGTL2 inhibitors in patients with specific hematologic neoplasms.
Funding: National Institutes of Health.
背景:治疗2型糖尿病的药物越来越多,针对多种代谢途径。近年来,像GLP-1受体激动剂这样的肠促胰岛素已被证明在控制高血糖和减肥方面有效,它们现在被单独批准用于治疗肥胖。鉴于肥胖和代谢综合征作为恶性肿瘤危险因素的重要性,GLP-1受体激动剂对癌症风险的影响越来越受到关注。在这里,我们分析了GLP-1受体激动剂和SGLT2抑制剂对癌症风险和死亡率的影响。方法:我们使用TriNetX电子健康记录数据库,在2019年至2024年间进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,其中包括诊断为2型糖尿病的患者。使用Cox比例风险模型比较了服用GLP-1受体激动剂、SGLT2抑制剂或两者都不服用的个体的四种肥胖相关血液恶性肿瘤的发病率。类似的分析也应用于研究中2型糖尿病和血液恶性肿瘤患者与这些药物类别相关的死亡率。结果:GLP-1受体激动剂的使用与多发性骨髓瘤(HR 0.64, p = 0.01)的风险显著降低相关,但与慢性髓性白血病(HR 1.06, p = 0.857)、急性髓性白血病(HR 0.81, p = 0.354)或骨髓增生异常综合征(HR 0.98, p = 0.996)的风险降低无关。这种效果在BMI为30、HbA1c为8%的亚组中保持不变。此外,我们发现在多发性骨髓瘤和急性髓性白血病患者中,SGLT2抑制剂的使用与死亡风险显著增加相关,与心脏或肾衰竭无关(MM HR 2.27, p < 0.001, AML HR 2.00, p = 0.006)。解释:我们的研究结果加强了代谢性疾病和多发性骨髓瘤之间的联系,但要求对特定血液肿瘤患者使用SGTL2抑制剂进行前瞻性研究。资助:美国国立卫生研究院。
{"title":"Incidence of hematologic malignancies and mortality associated with GLP-1 receptor agonist and SGLT2 inhibitor use in type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records.","authors":"Eric Edward Irons, Keri Ann Pfeil, Jaime Abraham Perez, Koen van Besien","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103749","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103749","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus are treated with a growing variety of medications targeting multiple metabolic pathways. In recent years, incretins such as the GLP-1 receptor agonists have proven effective in the control of hyperglycemia but also in weight loss, where they are now separately approved as a treatment for obesity. Given the importance of obesity and metabolic syndrome as risk factors for malignancy, the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cancer risk is of increasing interest. Here, we performed an analysis of the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors on cancer risk and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database of electronic health records between 2019 and 2024, including patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Individuals prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, or neither were compared for the incidence of four obesity-related hematologic malignancies using a Cox proportional hazards model. Similar analysis was applied to mortality associated with these medication classes in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the hematologic malignancies under study.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>GLP-1 receptor agonist use is associated with a significantly decreased risk of multiple myeloma (HR 0.64, p = 0.01), but not chronic myeloid leukemia (HR 1.06, p = 0.857), acute myeloid leukemia (HR 0.81, p = 0.354), or myelodysplastic syndrome (HR 0.98, p = 0.996). This effect was preserved in subgroups with BMI >30 and HbA1c >8%. Further, we find that in patients with multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia, SGLT2 inhibitor use is associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality, independent of heart or kidney failure (MM HR 2.27, p < 0.001, AML HR 2.00, p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our results strengthen the association between metabolic disease and multiple myeloma yet call for prospective investigation into the use of SGTL2 inhibitors in patients with specific hematologic neoplasms.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institutes of Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103749"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12830215/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146050924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103741
Nicholas A Koemel, Raaj K Biswas, Matthew N Ahmadi, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Mark Hamer, Leandro F M Rezende, John Mitchell, Rebecca M Leech, Mouna Sawan, Margaret Allman-Farinelli, Dorothea Dumuid, Adrian Bauman, Carol Maher, Stephen Barrett, Clara Chow, Alice A Gibson, David Raubenheimer, Samantha L Hocking, Kathryn Williams, Peter A Cistulli, Stephen J Simpson, Emmanuel Stamatakis
Background: Sleep, physical activity, and nutrition (SPAN) are key determinants of both life expectancy (lifespan) and disease-free life expectancy (healthspan), yet are often studied in isolation. This study aimed to determine the minimum combined SPAN improvements needed for a longer lifespan and healthspan.
Methods: This prospective cohort comprised 59,078 participants from the UK Biobank, recruited between 2006 and 2010 (median age: 64.0 years; 45.4% male). Between 2013 and 2015, a subsample of participants was invited to wear a wrist worn accelerometer for 7 days. Moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA; mins/day) and sleep (hours/day) were calculated using a validated wearables-based algorithm. Diet was assessed using a 10-item diet quality score (DQS), including intake of vegetables, fruits, grains, meats, fish, dairy, oils, and sugar-sweetened beverages (ranging 0-100; higher indicates better quality). Lifespan and healthspan (free of cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dementia) were estimated across 27 joint tertile SPAN combinations and a composite SPAN score using life tables.
Findings: Over an 8.1-year median follow-up, 2458 deaths, 9996 CVD, 7681 cancers, 2971 type II diabetes, 1540 COPD, and 508 dementia events occurred. Compared to the least favourable tertiles, the optimal tertiles (7.2-8.0 h/day of sleep; >42 min/day of MVPA; DQS of 57.5-72.5) had 9.35 additional years of lifespan (95% CI: 6.67, 11.63) and 9.45 years of healthspan (95% CI: 5.45, 13.61). Compared to the 5th percentile, a minimum combined improvement of 5 min/day of sleep, 1.9 min/day MVPA, and a 5-point increase in DQS (e.g., additional ½ serving of vegetables/day or additional 1.5 servings of whole grains per day) was associated with 1 additional year of lifespan (95% CI: 0.69, 1.15). For healthspan, a combined improvement of 24 min/day of sleep, 3.7 min/day of MVPA, and a 23-point DQS increase was associated with 4.0 additional years (95% CI: 0.50, 8.61).
Interpretation: Modest concurrent improvements in sleep, physical activity, and diet were associated with meaningful gains in lifespan and healthspan.
Funding: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
{"title":"Minimum combined sleep, physical activity, and nutrition variations associated with lifeSPAN and healthSPAN improvements: a population cohort study.","authors":"Nicholas A Koemel, Raaj K Biswas, Matthew N Ahmadi, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Mark Hamer, Leandro F M Rezende, John Mitchell, Rebecca M Leech, Mouna Sawan, Margaret Allman-Farinelli, Dorothea Dumuid, Adrian Bauman, Carol Maher, Stephen Barrett, Clara Chow, Alice A Gibson, David Raubenheimer, Samantha L Hocking, Kathryn Williams, Peter A Cistulli, Stephen J Simpson, Emmanuel Stamatakis","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103741","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103741","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep, physical activity, and nutrition (SPAN) are key determinants of both life expectancy (lifespan) and disease-free life expectancy (healthspan), yet are often studied in isolation. This study aimed to determine the minimum combined SPAN improvements needed for a longer lifespan and healthspan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort comprised 59,078 participants from the UK Biobank, recruited between 2006 and 2010 (median age: 64.0 years; 45.4% male). Between 2013 and 2015, a subsample of participants was invited to wear a wrist worn accelerometer for 7 days. Moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA; mins/day) and sleep (hours/day) were calculated using a validated wearables-based algorithm. Diet was assessed using a 10-item diet quality score (DQS), including intake of vegetables, fruits, grains, meats, fish, dairy, oils, and sugar-sweetened beverages (ranging 0-100; higher indicates better quality). Lifespan and healthspan (free of cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dementia) were estimated across 27 joint tertile SPAN combinations and a composite SPAN score using life tables.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Over an 8.1-year median follow-up, 2458 deaths, 9996 CVD, 7681 cancers, 2971 type II diabetes, 1540 COPD, and 508 dementia events occurred. Compared to the least favourable tertiles, the optimal tertiles (7.2-8.0 h/day of sleep; >42 min/day of MVPA; DQS of 57.5-72.5) had 9.35 additional years of lifespan (95% CI: 6.67, 11.63) and 9.45 years of healthspan (95% CI: 5.45, 13.61). Compared to the 5th percentile, a minimum combined improvement of 5 min/day of sleep, 1.9 min/day MVPA, and a 5-point increase in DQS (e.g., additional ½ serving of vegetables/day or additional 1.5 servings of whole grains per day) was associated with 1 additional year of lifespan (95% CI: 0.69, 1.15). For healthspan, a combined improvement of 24 min/day of sleep, 3.7 min/day of MVPA, and a 23-point DQS increase was associated with 4.0 additional years (95% CI: 0.50, 8.61).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Modest concurrent improvements in sleep, physical activity, and diet were associated with meaningful gains in lifespan and healthspan.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103741"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147324989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103730
Lew Lim, Nazanin Hosseinkhah, Mark Van Buskirk, Kevin Oei, Andrea Berk, Abhiram Pushparaj, Janine Liburd, Zara Abbaspour, Jonathan Rubine, David Jackson, Reza Zomorrodi
Background: Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) affects millions globally, with cognitive dysfunction ("brain fog") impairing daily functioning in up to 88% of patients. No effective treatments exist for PCC-related cognitive impairment. Photobiomodulation (PBM), a non-invasive therapy delivering near-infrared light, enhances mitochondrial function and reduces neuroinflammation, showing promise in neurological disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of home-based intranasal and transcranial PBM (itPBM) for PCC cognitive dysfunction.
Methods: This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial in the USA (ClinicalTrials.govNCT05857124) enrolled 43 adults (18-65 years) with PCC cognitive symptoms ≥12 weeks post-infection. Participants were randomized 1:1, stratified by age (<45 vs ≥ 45 years), using computer-generated assignment to 8 weeks of daily 20-min itPBM, 6 days per week, with the Vielight Neuro RX Gamma device or sham, targeting the brain's default mode network, followed by 4 weeks of observation. Participants, investigators, and assessors were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was mean change in Creyos cognitive battery composite score at Day 56. Secondary outcomes included fatigue, quality of life, and safety. Analyses used mixed-model repeated measures in the per-protocol population.
Findings: The trial was completed, with 43 participants randomized (23 active, 20 sham) and 41 analyzed (21 active, 20 sham). They were recruited between July 5, 2023, and September 1, 2024. Active itPBM improved composite cognitive scores more than sham (mean difference 0.043, 95% CI -0.007 to 0.092, p = 0.088), with significant gains in participants <45 years (prespecified but exploratory, p = 0.028). Attention tasks improved consistently (p < 0.050 at multiple timepoints). Secondary outcomes mobility favored sham (p = 0.007), and fatigue also favored sham. No serious adverse events occurred; compliance was high (median 55 days, interquartile range 2 days).
Interpretation: Home-based itPBM is safe and feasible, showing potential cognitive benefits for PCC brain fog, particularly in younger adults. Larger trials are needed to confirm efficacy and optimize parameters.
Funding: Vielight Inc.
背景:covid -19后疾病(PCC)影响全球数百万人,高达88%的患者认知功能障碍(“脑雾”)损害了日常功能。目前还没有有效的治疗方法来治疗pcc相关的认知障碍。光生物调节(PBM)是一种提供近红外光的非侵入性治疗,可增强线粒体功能并减少神经炎症,在神经系统疾病中显示出前景。本研究旨在评估基于家庭的鼻经颅PBM (itPBM)治疗PCC认知功能障碍的疗效和安全性。方法:这项在美国进行的随机、双盲、假对照试验(ClinicalTrials.govNCT05857124)招募了43名在感染后≥12周出现PCC认知症状的成年人(18-65岁)。参与者按年龄1:1随机分组(结果:试验完成,43名参与者随机分组(23名活跃参与者,20名假手术参与者),41名分析参与者(21名活跃参与者,20名假手术参与者)。他们是在2023年7月5日至2024年9月1日之间被招募的。与假手术相比,主动itPBM更能改善复合认知评分(平均差值为0.043,95% CI为-0.007至0.092,p = 0.088),在参与者中有显著提高。解释:基于家庭的itPBM是安全可行的,显示出PCC脑雾的潜在认知益处,特别是在年轻人中。需要更大规模的试验来确认疗效并优化参数。融资:Vielight Inc.
{"title":"Photobiomodulation for cognitive dysfunction (Brain Fog) in post-COVID-19 condition: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled pilot trial.","authors":"Lew Lim, Nazanin Hosseinkhah, Mark Van Buskirk, Kevin Oei, Andrea Berk, Abhiram Pushparaj, Janine Liburd, Zara Abbaspour, Jonathan Rubine, David Jackson, Reza Zomorrodi","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103730","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) affects millions globally, with cognitive dysfunction (\"brain fog\") impairing daily functioning in up to 88% of patients. No effective treatments exist for PCC-related cognitive impairment. Photobiomodulation (PBM), a non-invasive therapy delivering near-infrared light, enhances mitochondrial function and reduces neuroinflammation, showing promise in neurological disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of home-based intranasal and transcranial PBM (itPBM) for PCC cognitive dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial in the USA (ClinicalTrials.govNCT05857124) enrolled 43 adults (18-65 years) with PCC cognitive symptoms ≥12 weeks post-infection. Participants were randomized 1:1, stratified by age (<45 vs ≥ 45 years), using computer-generated assignment to 8 weeks of daily 20-min itPBM, 6 days per week, with the Vielight Neuro RX Gamma device or sham, targeting the brain's default mode network, followed by 4 weeks of observation. Participants, investigators, and assessors were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was mean change in Creyos cognitive battery composite score at Day 56. Secondary outcomes included fatigue, quality of life, and safety. Analyses used mixed-model repeated measures in the per-protocol population.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The trial was completed, with 43 participants randomized (23 active, 20 sham) and 41 analyzed (21 active, 20 sham). They were recruited between July 5, 2023, and September 1, 2024. Active itPBM improved composite cognitive scores more than sham (mean difference 0.043, 95% CI -0.007 to 0.092, p = 0.088), with significant gains in participants <45 years (prespecified but exploratory, p = 0.028). Attention tasks improved consistently (p < 0.050 at multiple timepoints). Secondary outcomes mobility favored sham (p = 0.007), and fatigue also favored sham. No serious adverse events occurred; compliance was high (median 55 days, interquartile range 2 days).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Home-based itPBM is safe and feasible, showing potential cognitive benefits for PCC brain fog, particularly in younger adults. Larger trials are needed to confirm efficacy and optimize parameters.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Vielight Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103730"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947646/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147324986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103746
Gebiso Roba Debele, Najmeh Davoodian, Mojtaba Lotfaliany, Rory Wolfe, Michael Berk, Andrew M Tonkin, Peter Gibbs, Zhen Zhou, Robyn L Woods, Suzanne G Orchard, A R M Saifuddin Ekram, Anne M Murray, Mark Nelson, Jeremy L Millar, Aaron R Kent, Wee Loon Ong, Christopher M Reid, Raj C Shah, Andrew Chan, Daniel Clayton-Chubb, Sophia Zoungas, John J McNeil, Mohammadreza Mohebbi
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence on whether statin use affects cancer incidence is inconclusive and limited among apparently healthy older adults. This study emulated a target trial comparing statin initiators versus non-initiators, with further analyses stratified by statin lipophilicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a target trial emulation using ASPREE (ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) and its extended observational data (ASPREE-XT). ASPREE was a placebo-controlled trial of low-dose aspirin in 19,114 older adults predominantly ≥70 years of age in Australia and the United States, who had no cardiovascular events, dementia, and independence-limiting physical disability at enrolment. We emulated a target trial of statin initiators versus non-initiators, following a prespecified target protocol. Key exclusion criteria were prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, high bleeding risk, conditions likely to limit 5-year survival, and anemia. The primary outcome was any-incident cancer and site-specific cancer, as adjudicated by an expert panel. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for predefined confounders including sociodemographic, clinical, and anthropometric factors, comorbidities, and co-medications to achieve balance between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants were enrolled from March 01, 2010, to December 31, 2014, with follow-up to June 12, 2017, during the trial phase and then extended to January 08, 2022, as observational study. Of 12,557 eligible participants, 1596 (12.7%) initiated statin, including 882 (7.0% lipophilic and 714 (5.7%) hydrophilic statin. Over a median follow-up of 8.3 years (IQR; 6.5-9.5), the cumulative incidence of cancer per 1000 person-years was 16.0 (95% CI: [13.8-18.3]) in statin initiators and 21.6 (95% CI: [20.6-22.6]) in the non-initiators. Statin use was associated with a lower risk of cancer (Sub-distribution Hazard Ratio (SHR): 0.70 95% CI [0.59-0.82]), metastatic (SHR: 0.70 95% CI [0.52-0.93]) and non-metastatic (SHR: 0.71 95% CI [0.58-0.87]) cancers. This association remained significant for lipophilic statins (metastatic (SHR: 0.65 95% CI [0.45-0.94]) and non-metastatic (SHR: 0.64 95% CI [0.49-0.84]) cancers), but not for hydrophilic statins (metastatic (SHR: 0.77 95% CI [0.52-1.13]) and non-metastatic (SHR: 0.80 95% CI [0.61-1.06]) cancers). Among site-specific cancers, prostate cancer (SHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.95) and breast cancer (SHR 0.55; 95% CI 0.33-0.93) showed significant association. The estimated number needed to treat associated with statin use was 31 (95% CI: 25-47) for any cancer, 56 (95% CI: 44-87) metastatic cancer, and 72 (95% CI: 46-100) non-metastatic cancer over a median follow-up of 8.3 years.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In this target trial emulation, statin use was associated with lower cancer incidence in older adults, with potential differences by cancer type and statin lipophili
{"title":"Association between statin use and risk of incident cancer in healthy older adults: a target trial emulation using data from a multicentre, randomised trial of community-dwelling older adults in Australia and the USA.","authors":"Gebiso Roba Debele, Najmeh Davoodian, Mojtaba Lotfaliany, Rory Wolfe, Michael Berk, Andrew M Tonkin, Peter Gibbs, Zhen Zhou, Robyn L Woods, Suzanne G Orchard, A R M Saifuddin Ekram, Anne M Murray, Mark Nelson, Jeremy L Millar, Aaron R Kent, Wee Loon Ong, Christopher M Reid, Raj C Shah, Andrew Chan, Daniel Clayton-Chubb, Sophia Zoungas, John J McNeil, Mohammadreza Mohebbi","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103746","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103746","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence on whether statin use affects cancer incidence is inconclusive and limited among apparently healthy older adults. This study emulated a target trial comparing statin initiators versus non-initiators, with further analyses stratified by statin lipophilicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a target trial emulation using ASPREE (ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) and its extended observational data (ASPREE-XT). ASPREE was a placebo-controlled trial of low-dose aspirin in 19,114 older adults predominantly ≥70 years of age in Australia and the United States, who had no cardiovascular events, dementia, and independence-limiting physical disability at enrolment. We emulated a target trial of statin initiators versus non-initiators, following a prespecified target protocol. Key exclusion criteria were prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, high bleeding risk, conditions likely to limit 5-year survival, and anemia. The primary outcome was any-incident cancer and site-specific cancer, as adjudicated by an expert panel. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for predefined confounders including sociodemographic, clinical, and anthropometric factors, comorbidities, and co-medications to achieve balance between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants were enrolled from March 01, 2010, to December 31, 2014, with follow-up to June 12, 2017, during the trial phase and then extended to January 08, 2022, as observational study. Of 12,557 eligible participants, 1596 (12.7%) initiated statin, including 882 (7.0% lipophilic and 714 (5.7%) hydrophilic statin. Over a median follow-up of 8.3 years (IQR; 6.5-9.5), the cumulative incidence of cancer per 1000 person-years was 16.0 (95% CI: [13.8-18.3]) in statin initiators and 21.6 (95% CI: [20.6-22.6]) in the non-initiators. Statin use was associated with a lower risk of cancer (Sub-distribution Hazard Ratio (SHR): 0.70 95% CI [0.59-0.82]), metastatic (SHR: 0.70 95% CI [0.52-0.93]) and non-metastatic (SHR: 0.71 95% CI [0.58-0.87]) cancers. This association remained significant for lipophilic statins (metastatic (SHR: 0.65 95% CI [0.45-0.94]) and non-metastatic (SHR: 0.64 95% CI [0.49-0.84]) cancers), but not for hydrophilic statins (metastatic (SHR: 0.77 95% CI [0.52-1.13]) and non-metastatic (SHR: 0.80 95% CI [0.61-1.06]) cancers). Among site-specific cancers, prostate cancer (SHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.95) and breast cancer (SHR 0.55; 95% CI 0.33-0.93) showed significant association. The estimated number needed to treat associated with statin use was 31 (95% CI: 25-47) for any cancer, 56 (95% CI: 44-87) metastatic cancer, and 72 (95% CI: 46-100) non-metastatic cancer over a median follow-up of 8.3 years.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In this target trial emulation, statin use was associated with lower cancer incidence in older adults, with potential differences by cancer type and statin lipophili","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103746"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12828538/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146050932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103747
Sandra India Aldana, Xin Yu, Meizhen Yao, Nathan Cohen, Eftychia Markopoulou, Maanal Chowdhury, Vishal Midya, Stephanie M Eick, Jessica Trowbridge, Anne P Starling, Dinesh Barupal, Douglas I Walker, Leda Chatzi, Veronica Wendy Setiawan, Ryan W Walker, Elena Colicino, Damaskini Valvi
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growing literature examines the impact of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on diabetes risk. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies to characterize the associations of exposures to PFAS with markers of glycemic control, insulin resistance, pancreatic β-cell function, and diabetes risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of epidemiological articles published through July 21, 2025 was conducted by two researchers in PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid/EMBASE following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Experimental studies were excluded from our review. Reported findings were extracted from published articles. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Navigation Guide. Random-effects meta-analyses stratified by study design estimated PFAS associations with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and continuous measures of Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), HOMA-β, fasting insulin, fasting glucose, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022369711).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Out of 738 records retrieved, we identified 129 eligible studies. Most studies focused on GDM (n = 25) and/or T2D (n = 36), while three focused on type 1 diabetes (T1D). Participant numbers ranged from n = 40 to n = 1,331,541 in the systematic review and from n = 399 to n = 111,544 in the meta-analyses. We found consistent associations between 8 different PFAS and higher odds of GDM across prospective and other study designs, including PFOS [n = 8, OR (95%CI) per doubling PFOS increase: 1.13 (1.01, 1.26), I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%] among other PFAS. We also found positive associations between several legacy PFAS such as PFOS with HOMA-IR [(n = 8), β (95%CI): 0.06 (0.01, 0.12), I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%] and fasting insulin [n = 5, β (95% CI) in μU/mL: 0.23 (0.06, 0.40), I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%] in prospective studies, and HOMA-β in cross-sectional studies [(n = 6), β (95% CI): 5.93 (1.72, 10.2), I<sup>2</sup> = 67.0%], among other. Less consistent or null associations were with T2D, fasting glucose, and HbA1c. The evidence was of low-moderate quality and limited strength. Most studies were categorized as low risk of bias for other criteria, except for study design (cross-sectional).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Evidence from observational studies supports PFAS associations with higher odds of GDM and increased markers of insulin resistance and secretion. PFAS associations with established T2D or T1D remain to be elucidated, as evidence is still limited and effect sizes for some continuous diabetes markers were small and should be interpreted with caution. Larger life-course prospective studies with greater representation of well-characterized cases and evaluating emerging PFAS and mixtures are needed to fully capture the potential PFAS impa
{"title":"Associations of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances with markers of glycaemic control, insulin secretion and sensitivity, and diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analyses.","authors":"Sandra India Aldana, Xin Yu, Meizhen Yao, Nathan Cohen, Eftychia Markopoulou, Maanal Chowdhury, Vishal Midya, Stephanie M Eick, Jessica Trowbridge, Anne P Starling, Dinesh Barupal, Douglas I Walker, Leda Chatzi, Veronica Wendy Setiawan, Ryan W Walker, Elena Colicino, Damaskini Valvi","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103747","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103747","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Growing literature examines the impact of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on diabetes risk. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies to characterize the associations of exposures to PFAS with markers of glycemic control, insulin resistance, pancreatic β-cell function, and diabetes risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of epidemiological articles published through July 21, 2025 was conducted by two researchers in PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid/EMBASE following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Experimental studies were excluded from our review. Reported findings were extracted from published articles. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Navigation Guide. Random-effects meta-analyses stratified by study design estimated PFAS associations with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and continuous measures of Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), HOMA-β, fasting insulin, fasting glucose, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022369711).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Out of 738 records retrieved, we identified 129 eligible studies. Most studies focused on GDM (n = 25) and/or T2D (n = 36), while three focused on type 1 diabetes (T1D). Participant numbers ranged from n = 40 to n = 1,331,541 in the systematic review and from n = 399 to n = 111,544 in the meta-analyses. We found consistent associations between 8 different PFAS and higher odds of GDM across prospective and other study designs, including PFOS [n = 8, OR (95%CI) per doubling PFOS increase: 1.13 (1.01, 1.26), I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%] among other PFAS. We also found positive associations between several legacy PFAS such as PFOS with HOMA-IR [(n = 8), β (95%CI): 0.06 (0.01, 0.12), I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%] and fasting insulin [n = 5, β (95% CI) in μU/mL: 0.23 (0.06, 0.40), I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%] in prospective studies, and HOMA-β in cross-sectional studies [(n = 6), β (95% CI): 5.93 (1.72, 10.2), I<sup>2</sup> = 67.0%], among other. Less consistent or null associations were with T2D, fasting glucose, and HbA1c. The evidence was of low-moderate quality and limited strength. Most studies were categorized as low risk of bias for other criteria, except for study design (cross-sectional).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Evidence from observational studies supports PFAS associations with higher odds of GDM and increased markers of insulin resistance and secretion. PFAS associations with established T2D or T1D remain to be elucidated, as evidence is still limited and effect sizes for some continuous diabetes markers were small and should be interpreted with caution. Larger life-course prospective studies with greater representation of well-characterized cases and evaluating emerging PFAS and mixtures are needed to fully capture the potential PFAS impa","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"92 ","pages":"103747"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947643/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147325016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103755
Aleksander M Bogdanski, Derk C F Klatte, Bert A Bonsing, Lodewijk A A Brosens, Evelien Dekker, Lydia G van der Geest, Joep E G Ijspeert, Jan J Koornstra, Mariëtte C A van Kouwen, Alexandra M J Langers, Maartje Nielsen, Dewkoemar Ramsoekh, Manon C Spaander, Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Jeanin E Van Hooft, Monique E van Leerdam
Background: Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are advised to undergo pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surveillance if their lifetime risk is ≥5%, however, evidence is limited. This study quantifies lifetime risk and survival of three cancers relevant to PDAC surveillance, including PDAC, ampullary carcinoma (AC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCC), to evaluate whether surveillance is justified.
Methods: This retrospective nationwide Dutch cohort study included individuals with LS pathogenic variants (PVs) in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 or EpCAM (identified between 1985 and 2024) and compared them to sporadic cases from the general population (diagnosed between 2000 and 2022). Cumulative incidence (CI) of PDAC, AC and dCC was estimated using Fine-and-Gray models for LS and a CI formula for sporadic cases. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated by comparing CIs. Survival of the cancers was compared between both cohorts using 1:10 matched analyses by age at diagnosis, sex, stage, and year of diagnosis.
Findings: In total, 2605 individuals with LS were included (median age 63.9 years; IQR 53.7-74.0), of whom 1515 (58.2%) were female. PVs were identified in MLH1 (723, 27.8%), MSH2 (895, 34.4%), MSH6 (731, 28.1%), PMS2 (233, 8.9%) and EpCAM (23, 0.9%). By age 75, the combined CI of PDAC, AC and dCC was 3.0% (95% CIs, 1.5-5.8) in MLH1, 3.4% (95% CIs, 2.0-5.8) in MSH2/EpCAM, 1.0% (95% CIs, 0.3-2.7) in MSH6 and 0% in PMS2. No familial-clustering of cancers was observed. Matched survival did not differ between PDACs in LS and sporadic cases. In contrast, survival was better for AC in LS (34.3 months; 95% CIs, 3.2-Inf) compared to sporadic cases (15.5 months; 95% CIs, 9.9-19.3).
Interpretation: In LS, the combined lifetime risk of PDAC, AC and dCC ranged from 0 to 3.4% across different genes, remaining below the 5% risk threshold for PDAC surveillance. Additionally, having an affected relative did not appear to increase risk. These findings suggest that current surveillance recommendations for individuals with LS should be re-evaluated.
{"title":"Pancreatic cancer risk and survival in patients with Lynch syndrome: a nationwide Dutch cohort study.","authors":"Aleksander M Bogdanski, Derk C F Klatte, Bert A Bonsing, Lodewijk A A Brosens, Evelien Dekker, Lydia G van der Geest, Joep E G Ijspeert, Jan J Koornstra, Mariëtte C A van Kouwen, Alexandra M J Langers, Maartje Nielsen, Dewkoemar Ramsoekh, Manon C Spaander, Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Jeanin E Van Hooft, Monique E van Leerdam","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103755","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.103755","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are advised to undergo pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surveillance if their lifetime risk is ≥5%, however, evidence is limited. This study quantifies lifetime risk and survival of three cancers relevant to PDAC surveillance, including PDAC, ampullary carcinoma (AC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCC), to evaluate whether surveillance is justified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective nationwide Dutch cohort study included individuals with LS pathogenic variants (PVs) in <i>MLH1</i>, <i>MSH2</i>, <i>MSH6</i>, <i>PMS2</i> or <i>EpCAM</i> (identified between 1985 and 2024) and compared them to sporadic cases from the general population (diagnosed between 2000 and 2022). Cumulative incidence (CI) of PDAC, AC and dCC was estimated using Fine-and-Gray models for LS and a CI formula for sporadic cases. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated by comparing CIs. Survival of the cancers was compared between both cohorts using 1:10 matched analyses by age at diagnosis, sex, stage, and year of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 2605 individuals with LS were included (median age 63.9 years; IQR 53.7-74.0), of whom 1515 (58.2%) were female. PVs were identified in <i>MLH1</i> (723, 27.8%), <i>MSH2</i> (895, 34.4%), <i>MSH6</i> (731, 28.1%), <i>PMS2</i> (233, 8.9%) and <i>EpCAM</i> (23, 0.9%). By age 75, the combined CI of PDAC, AC and dCC was 3.0% (95% CIs, 1.5-5.8) in <i>MLH1</i>, 3.4% (95% CIs, 2.0-5.8) in <i>MSH2/EpCAM</i>, 1.0% (95% CIs, 0.3-2.7) in <i>MSH6</i> and 0% in <i>PMS2</i>. No familial-clustering of cancers was observed. Matched survival did not differ between PDACs in LS and sporadic cases. In contrast, survival was better for AC in LS (34.3 months; 95% CIs, 3.2-Inf) compared to sporadic cases (15.5 months; 95% CIs, 9.9-19.3).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In LS, the combined lifetime risk of PDAC, AC and dCC ranged from 0 to 3.4% across different genes, remaining below the 5% risk threshold for PDAC surveillance. Additionally, having an affected relative did not appear to increase risk. These findings suggest that current surveillance recommendations for individuals with LS should be re-evaluated.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Lynch-Polyposis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103755"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12828513/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103753
María Queralt Salas, Tommy Alfaro Moya, Ivan Pasic, Mónica Baile González, Marina Acera Gómez, Laura Fox, María Del Mar Pérez Artigas, Ana Santamaría, María Del Carmen Quintela González, Andrés Sánchez Salinas, Joaquina M Salmerón Camacho, Verónica Illana Álvaro, Zahra Abdallahi-Lefdil, Javier Cornago Navascues, Laura Pardo, Sara Fernández-Luis, Leddy Patricia Vega Suárez, Sara Villar, Patricia Beorlegui-Murillo, Albert Esquirol, Isabel Izquierdo García, Alberto Mussetti, Esperanza Lavilla, Javier Lopez-Marín, Silvia Filaferro, Pascual Balsalobre, Leyre Bento, Arjun Law, Auro Viswabandya, Fotios V Michelis, Jonas Mattsson, Shabbir Alibhai, Montserrat Rovira, Dennis Dong Wang Kim, Anna Sureda, Rajat Kumar
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty assessment has emerged as a key component of pre-transplant evaluation. We aimed to validate, across international cohorts, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Frailty Scale (HCT-FS) for the assessment of frailty in adult candidates for allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). HCT-FS is designed for integration into routine workflows using existing resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, observational cohort study, we evaluated the performance of HCT-FS, a frailty scale that categorises patients as fit, pre-frail, or frail based on a cumulative weighted score derived from eight variables. We enrolled participants across 16 allo-HCT programmes (one in Canada, 15 in Spain). Eligible participants were all adult patients evaluated for frailty at the centres during the time frames: from the Hans Messner Allo-HCT Program at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) in Toronto, Canada (2018-2024; where HCT-FS was developed) and from 15 Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) centres across Spain (2022-2023). Frailty was systematically assessed in all candidates for a median of 10 min at the first allo-HCT consultation by haematologists or trained nurses using the HCT-FS. The prognostic accuracy of the HCT-FS was assessed by evaluating its ability to discriminate clinical outcomes across frailty categories in the overall cohort and by testing the consistency of these associations within specific patient subgroups. Data were prospectively updated until February 2025.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Overall, 1077 consecutive adult allo-HCT candidates were enrolled and evaluated across the PMCC (n = 734) and GETH-TC (n = 343) cohorts. The median age was 56 years (range 18-76); 411 patients (38.2%) were over 60, and 640 (59.4%) were male. Based on the HCT-FS, 33.4% patients were fit, 53.7% pre-frail, and 12.8% frail. Frailty was associated with longer hospital stays (23, 25, and 28 days for fit, pre-frail, and frail patients, respectively; p = 0.003) and higher ICU admission rates (Day +180: 7.0%, 10.8%, and 20.3% for fit, pre-frail, and frail patients, respectively; p = 0.002). 2-year OS decreased progressively with increasing frailty: 77.2% for fit, 65.7% for pre-frail, and 52.8% for frail (p < 0.001). Corresponding NRM rates were 11.7%, 19.5%, and 32.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed frailty as a predictor of inferior OS and increased NRM, when adjusting for age, comorbidities, performance status, DRI, and donor type. The HCT-FS maintained robust prognostic accuracy across subgroups stratified by age and comorbidity burden.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The HCT-FS provided reliable measures of the frailty status of allo-HCT candidates that are informative for transplant outcomes, supporting its potential applicability in clinical practice. Notably, this tool was successfully integrated into clinical practice
{"title":"HCT Frailty Scale (HCT-FS) for assessing frailty in adult candidates for allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: an international prospective, observational cohort study.","authors":"María Queralt Salas, Tommy Alfaro Moya, Ivan Pasic, Mónica Baile González, Marina Acera Gómez, Laura Fox, María Del Mar Pérez Artigas, Ana Santamaría, María Del Carmen Quintela González, Andrés Sánchez Salinas, Joaquina M Salmerón Camacho, Verónica Illana Álvaro, Zahra Abdallahi-Lefdil, Javier Cornago Navascues, Laura Pardo, Sara Fernández-Luis, Leddy Patricia Vega Suárez, Sara Villar, Patricia Beorlegui-Murillo, Albert Esquirol, Isabel Izquierdo García, Alberto Mussetti, Esperanza Lavilla, Javier Lopez-Marín, Silvia Filaferro, Pascual Balsalobre, Leyre Bento, Arjun Law, Auro Viswabandya, Fotios V Michelis, Jonas Mattsson, Shabbir Alibhai, Montserrat Rovira, Dennis Dong Wang Kim, Anna Sureda, Rajat Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103753","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103753","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty assessment has emerged as a key component of pre-transplant evaluation. We aimed to validate, across international cohorts, the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Frailty Scale (HCT-FS) for the assessment of frailty in adult candidates for allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). HCT-FS is designed for integration into routine workflows using existing resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, observational cohort study, we evaluated the performance of HCT-FS, a frailty scale that categorises patients as fit, pre-frail, or frail based on a cumulative weighted score derived from eight variables. We enrolled participants across 16 allo-HCT programmes (one in Canada, 15 in Spain). Eligible participants were all adult patients evaluated for frailty at the centres during the time frames: from the Hans Messner Allo-HCT Program at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC) in Toronto, Canada (2018-2024; where HCT-FS was developed) and from 15 Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) centres across Spain (2022-2023). Frailty was systematically assessed in all candidates for a median of 10 min at the first allo-HCT consultation by haematologists or trained nurses using the HCT-FS. The prognostic accuracy of the HCT-FS was assessed by evaluating its ability to discriminate clinical outcomes across frailty categories in the overall cohort and by testing the consistency of these associations within specific patient subgroups. Data were prospectively updated until February 2025.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Overall, 1077 consecutive adult allo-HCT candidates were enrolled and evaluated across the PMCC (n = 734) and GETH-TC (n = 343) cohorts. The median age was 56 years (range 18-76); 411 patients (38.2%) were over 60, and 640 (59.4%) were male. Based on the HCT-FS, 33.4% patients were fit, 53.7% pre-frail, and 12.8% frail. Frailty was associated with longer hospital stays (23, 25, and 28 days for fit, pre-frail, and frail patients, respectively; p = 0.003) and higher ICU admission rates (Day +180: 7.0%, 10.8%, and 20.3% for fit, pre-frail, and frail patients, respectively; p = 0.002). 2-year OS decreased progressively with increasing frailty: 77.2% for fit, 65.7% for pre-frail, and 52.8% for frail (p < 0.001). Corresponding NRM rates were 11.7%, 19.5%, and 32.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed frailty as a predictor of inferior OS and increased NRM, when adjusting for age, comorbidities, performance status, DRI, and donor type. The HCT-FS maintained robust prognostic accuracy across subgroups stratified by age and comorbidity burden.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The HCT-FS provided reliable measures of the frailty status of allo-HCT candidates that are informative for transplant outcomes, supporting its potential applicability in clinical practice. Notably, this tool was successfully integrated into clinical practice","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103753"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12818066/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103737
Yen-Wen Huang, Ying-Chieh Chen, Ernest Yin Lun Lau, Yu-Chin Su, Lung-Kuo Tai, Joseph Rosenthal, Jonas Wang, Tong-Young Lee
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-COVID syndrome affects a substantial proportion of individuals worldwide and imposes significant healthcare and economic burdens. Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms in those with severe symptoms related to post-COVID fatigue syndrome, yet there remains a lack of targeted therapies, effective or approved treatments to address it. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of repeated doses of REGENECYTE, an allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) therapy derived from cord blood, in patients with post-COVID syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIa trial, we evaluated repeated intravenous infusions of REGENECYTE from different donors (without HLA matching) in patients with post-COVID syndrome in the USA. Eligible adults aged 18-65 years had persistent post-COVID symptoms between 6 and 18 months and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 within 7 days before enrollment. Participants were randomized into a 2:1 ratio to receive either REGENECYTE or placebo. Three infusions were administered over 6 weeks, 3 weeks apart, followed by a 20-week follow-up. Each dose of REGENECYTE contains at least 1 × 10<sup>7</sup> total nucleated cells (TNC)/kg, with a cumulative dose of at least 3 × 10<sup>7</sup> TNC/kg per patient. The primary endpoint was safety, assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events by National Cancer Institute (NCI CTCAE) v5.0. The key secondary endpoint focused on changes in fatigue using the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ-11), while exploratory endpoints evaluated frailty, quality of life, and cognition using validated instruments. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05682560.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 4 and Dec 26, 2023, 30 eligible patients were enrolled and completed the study. The mean age was 41.9 years; 70% were female. The average duration of post-COVID symptoms was 306 days. Only 2 patients (10%) in the REGENECYTE group experienced mild treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), indicating good tolerability. Notably, REGENECYTE significantly and sustainably improved fatigue symptoms, as measured by CFQ-11 Bimodal and Likert scores, compared to placebo (p < 0.01). Improvements were observed as early as week 6 and persisted through the 20-week follow-up. The most pronounced benefit was seen in the physical fatigue domain. REGENECYTE also improved quality of life in domains such as usual activities and mental wellbeing. There were no significant changes in frailty or cognitive scores.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>REGENECYTE was well tolerated and safe when administered as repeat infusions from unmatched cord blood donors. It produced a meaningful and durable reduction in fatigue symptoms, the most burdensome feature of post-COVID syndrome-highlighting its potential as a novel therapeutic strategy. These findings supp
{"title":"REGENECYTE cord blood cell therapy in post-COVID syndrome: a phase IIa randomized, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Yen-Wen Huang, Ying-Chieh Chen, Ernest Yin Lun Lau, Yu-Chin Su, Lung-Kuo Tai, Joseph Rosenthal, Jonas Wang, Tong-Young Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103737","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103737","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-COVID syndrome affects a substantial proportion of individuals worldwide and imposes significant healthcare and economic burdens. Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms in those with severe symptoms related to post-COVID fatigue syndrome, yet there remains a lack of targeted therapies, effective or approved treatments to address it. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of repeated doses of REGENECYTE, an allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) therapy derived from cord blood, in patients with post-COVID syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIa trial, we evaluated repeated intravenous infusions of REGENECYTE from different donors (without HLA matching) in patients with post-COVID syndrome in the USA. Eligible adults aged 18-65 years had persistent post-COVID symptoms between 6 and 18 months and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 within 7 days before enrollment. Participants were randomized into a 2:1 ratio to receive either REGENECYTE or placebo. Three infusions were administered over 6 weeks, 3 weeks apart, followed by a 20-week follow-up. Each dose of REGENECYTE contains at least 1 × 10<sup>7</sup> total nucleated cells (TNC)/kg, with a cumulative dose of at least 3 × 10<sup>7</sup> TNC/kg per patient. The primary endpoint was safety, assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events by National Cancer Institute (NCI CTCAE) v5.0. The key secondary endpoint focused on changes in fatigue using the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ-11), while exploratory endpoints evaluated frailty, quality of life, and cognition using validated instruments. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05682560.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 4 and Dec 26, 2023, 30 eligible patients were enrolled and completed the study. The mean age was 41.9 years; 70% were female. The average duration of post-COVID symptoms was 306 days. Only 2 patients (10%) in the REGENECYTE group experienced mild treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), indicating good tolerability. Notably, REGENECYTE significantly and sustainably improved fatigue symptoms, as measured by CFQ-11 Bimodal and Likert scores, compared to placebo (p < 0.01). Improvements were observed as early as week 6 and persisted through the 20-week follow-up. The most pronounced benefit was seen in the physical fatigue domain. REGENECYTE also improved quality of life in domains such as usual activities and mental wellbeing. There were no significant changes in frailty or cognitive scores.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>REGENECYTE was well tolerated and safe when administered as repeat infusions from unmatched cord blood donors. It produced a meaningful and durable reduction in fatigue symptoms, the most burdensome feature of post-COVID syndrome-highlighting its potential as a novel therapeutic strategy. These findings supp","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103737"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12853356/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146104156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103739
Win Min Han, Bastian Neesgaard, Michael Knappik, Matthias Cavassini, Irene A Abela, Alisa Timiryasova, Lauren Greenberg, Charlotte Martin, Cristina Mussini, Ferdinand Wit, Caroline Sabin, Antonella Castagna, Akaki Abutidze, Wafaa El-Sadr, Fabrice Bonnet, Mario Sarcletti, Christina Carlander, Anna Hachfeld, Nina Weis, Vani Vannappagari, Felipe P Rogatto, Lital A Young, Sean R Hosein, Lene Ryom, Kathy Petoumenos
Background: Data on cancer incidence and associated risk factors among women with HIV are limited. We investigated cancer burden among women with HIV.
Methods: We included all women ≥18 years from the two large multicentre observational cohort collaborations (D:A:D and RESPOND). The primary outcomes were incidence of all cancers, HPV-related and common individual cancers including breast cancer, lung cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) from 2006 to 2021. Baseline was defined as the latest date of entry into local cohort enrolment and 1st January 2006 for D:A:D and 1st January 2012 for RESPOND. Participants were followed from baseline until the date of first cancer, final follow-up or administrative censoring-whichever occurred first. We assessed risk factors using multivariable Poisson regression by applying robust standard errors and determined a population attributable fraction (PAF) for key risk factors for cancers.
Findings: Among 17,512 women included, median age at baseline was 39.5 years (interquartile range, IQR 32.5-46.0). Over 141,404 person-years (PYS) and a median 9.2 (5.5-10.1) years of follow-up, 832 women were diagnosed with any cancer; incidence rate 5.9 (95% CI 5.5-6.4)/1000 PYS, 163 HPV-related cancers (1.1 [1.0-1.3]/1000 PYS), 150 breast cancers (1.1 [0.9-1.2]/1000 PYS), 94 lung cancers (0.7 [0.5-0.8]/1000 PYS) and 72 NHL (0.5 [0.4-0.6]/1000 PYS). Older age (≥45 vs. <45 years), Southern Europe (vs. Western Europe) and smoking were associated with an increased risk of overall cancers. Lower pre-ART nadir CD4, time-updated CD4, and a prior AIDS diagnosis were associated with lung- and HPV-related cancer. In PAF analysis, smoking and HIV-related factors such as lower current CD4, nadir CD4 and HIV viremia significantly contributed to cancer risk.
Interpretation: Our findings suggest that women with HIV older than 45 years, past or current immunosuppressed or current smokers could be candidates for intensified cancer screening and prevention.
Funding: The Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Oversight Committee, The CHU St Pierre Brussels HIV Cohort, The Austrian HIV Cohort Study, The Australian HIV Observational Database, The AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands national observational HIV cohort, The Brighton HIV Cohort, The National Croatian HIV Cohort, The EuroSIDA cohort, The Frankfurt HIV Cohort Study, The Georgian National AIDS Health Information System, The Nice HIV Cohort, The Isabel Foundation, The Modena HIV Cohort, The PISCIS Cohort Study, The Swiss HIV Cohort Study, The Swedish InfCare HIV Cohort, The Royal Free HIV Cohort Study, The San Raffaele Scientific Institute, The University Hospital Bonn HIV Cohort, The University of Cologne HIV Cohort, Merck Life Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences.
背景:感染艾滋病毒的妇女中癌症发病率和相关危险因素的数据有限。我们调查了感染艾滋病毒的妇女的癌症负担。方法:我们纳入了来自两个大型多中心观察队列合作(D:A:D和response)的所有≥18岁的女性。主要结局是2006年至2021年间所有癌症、hpv相关和常见个体癌症(包括乳腺癌、肺癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL))的发病率。基线定义为进入当地队列的最迟日期,D:A:D为2006年1月1日,response为2012年1月1日。参与者从基线开始被跟踪,直到第一次癌症,最后随访或行政审查,以先发生者为准。我们使用多变量泊松回归通过应用稳健标准误差评估危险因素,并确定癌症关键危险因素的人口归因分数(PAF)。结果:纳入的17512名女性中,基线年龄中位数为39.5岁(四分位数范围,IQR 32.5-46.0)。在141404人年(PYS)和中位9.2(5.5-10.1)年的随访中,832名女性被诊断患有任何癌症;发病率为5.9 (95% CI 5.5-6.4)/1000 PYS, 163例hpv相关癌症(1.1 [1.0-1.3]/1000 PYS), 150例乳腺癌(1.1 [0.9-1.2]/1000 PYS), 94例肺癌(0.7 [0.5-0.8]/1000 PYS), 72例NHL (0.5 [0.4-0.6]/1000 PYS)。年龄较大(≥45岁vs.解释:我们的研究结果表明,年龄大于45岁的女性艾滋病毒感染者、过去或现在的免疫抑制或现在的吸烟者可能是加强癌症筛查和预防的候选者。资助:高活性抗逆转录病毒治疗监督委员会、CHU St Pierre Brussels HIV队列、奥地利HIV队列研究、澳大利亚HIV观察数据库、荷兰国家HIV观察队列艾滋病治疗评估、布莱顿HIV队列、克罗地亚国家HIV队列、EuroSIDA队列、法兰克福HIV队列研究、格鲁吉亚国家艾滋病卫生信息系统、尼斯HIV队列、伊莎贝尔基金会、摩德纳HIV队列、PISCIS队列研究、瑞士HIV队列研究、瑞典InfCare HIV队列研究、皇家自由HIV队列研究、圣拉斐尔科学研究所、波恩大学医院HIV队列、科隆大学HIV队列、默克生命科学、ViiV医疗保健和吉利德科学。
{"title":"Cancer burden and risk factors among women with HIV: a multi-regional study from the D:A:D and RESPOND cohort collaborations.","authors":"Win Min Han, Bastian Neesgaard, Michael Knappik, Matthias Cavassini, Irene A Abela, Alisa Timiryasova, Lauren Greenberg, Charlotte Martin, Cristina Mussini, Ferdinand Wit, Caroline Sabin, Antonella Castagna, Akaki Abutidze, Wafaa El-Sadr, Fabrice Bonnet, Mario Sarcletti, Christina Carlander, Anna Hachfeld, Nina Weis, Vani Vannappagari, Felipe P Rogatto, Lital A Young, Sean R Hosein, Lene Ryom, Kathy Petoumenos","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103739","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103739","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on cancer incidence and associated risk factors among women with HIV are limited. We investigated cancer burden among women with HIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all women ≥18 years from the two large multicentre observational cohort collaborations (D:A:D and RESPOND). The primary outcomes were incidence of all cancers, HPV-related and common individual cancers including breast cancer, lung cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) from 2006 to 2021. Baseline was defined as the latest date of entry into local cohort enrolment and 1st January 2006 for D:A:D and 1st January 2012 for RESPOND. Participants were followed from baseline until the date of first cancer, final follow-up or administrative censoring-whichever occurred first. We assessed risk factors using multivariable Poisson regression by applying robust standard errors and determined a population attributable fraction (PAF) for key risk factors for cancers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 17,512 women included, median age at baseline was 39.5 years (interquartile range, IQR 32.5-46.0). Over 141,404 person-years (PYS) and a median 9.2 (5.5-10.1) years of follow-up, 832 women were diagnosed with any cancer; incidence rate 5.9 (95% CI 5.5-6.4)/1000 PYS, 163 HPV-related cancers (1.1 [1.0-1.3]/1000 PYS), 150 breast cancers (1.1 [0.9-1.2]/1000 PYS), 94 lung cancers (0.7 [0.5-0.8]/1000 PYS) and 72 NHL (0.5 [0.4-0.6]/1000 PYS). Older age (≥45 vs. <45 years), Southern Europe (vs. Western Europe) and smoking were associated with an increased risk of overall cancers. Lower pre-ART nadir CD4, time-updated CD4, and a prior AIDS diagnosis were associated with lung- and HPV-related cancer. In PAF analysis, smoking and HIV-related factors such as lower current CD4, nadir CD4 and HIV viremia significantly contributed to cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings suggest that women with HIV older than 45 years, past or current immunosuppressed or current smokers could be candidates for intensified cancer screening and prevention.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Oversight Committee, The CHU St Pierre Brussels HIV Cohort, The Austrian HIV Cohort Study, The Australian HIV Observational Database, The AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands national observational HIV cohort, The Brighton HIV Cohort, The National Croatian HIV Cohort, The EuroSIDA cohort, The Frankfurt HIV Cohort Study, The Georgian National AIDS Health Information System, The Nice HIV Cohort, The Isabel Foundation, The Modena HIV Cohort, The PISCIS Cohort Study, The Swiss HIV Cohort Study, The Swedish InfCare HIV Cohort, The Royal Free HIV Cohort Study, The San Raffaele Scientific Institute, The University Hospital Bonn HIV Cohort, The University of Cologne HIV Cohort, Merck Life Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103739"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12818069/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103743
William Nkhono, Eva van Lieshout, Job Calis, Violet Naanyu, Mark Hoogendoorn, Kamija S Phiri, María Villalobos-Quesada
Background: Machine Learning (ML) can contribute to reducing child mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet its development and clinical adoption remain unclear. This systematic review provides an overview of ML for hospitalised children in LMICs.
Methods: In June 2025, searches in five scientific databases and one scholarly search engine identified 26 eligible peer-reviewed studies using ML on hospitalised children under 18. Studies using only conventional statistics and perinatal data were excluded. Study quality and bias were assessed using PROBAST + AI. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. PRISMA reporting guideline was followed.
Findings: These studies were conducted in Asia (58%) and Sub-Saharan Africa (38%), mostly retrospective (62%), and predominantly used patient files (62%). The median sample size was 1291. Prognostic models dominated (69%), primarily targeting mortality (50%). Ensemble methods were most common (50%). The median AUROC was 0.81 (IQR 0.78-0.83). Most models were at a clinical Readiness Level 3-4 (81%). Barriers and facilitators related to data (65%, 34% respectively), implementation (50%, 77%), technology (31%, 42%), and human (19%, 35%) were reported.
Interpretation: We provided evidence of ML's promising performance for LMICs. Mortality prediction was the main focus. Arriving at clinical applications that benefit LMICs, requires investment in high-quality data and alignment to local (clinical) needs.
Funding: This project is part of the EDCTP2 programme (grant number RIA2020I-3294 IMPALA) supported by the European Union.
{"title":"Machine learning for predicting clinical outcomes of hospitalised children: a systematic review of applications in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"William Nkhono, Eva van Lieshout, Job Calis, Violet Naanyu, Mark Hoogendoorn, Kamija S Phiri, María Villalobos-Quesada","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103743","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103743","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Machine Learning (ML) can contribute to reducing child mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet its development and clinical adoption remain unclear. This systematic review provides an overview of ML for hospitalised children in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In June 2025, searches in five scientific databases and one scholarly search engine identified 26 eligible peer-reviewed studies using ML on hospitalised children under 18. Studies using only conventional statistics and perinatal data were excluded. Study quality and bias were assessed using PROBAST + AI. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. PRISMA reporting guideline was followed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>These studies were conducted in Asia (58%) and Sub-Saharan Africa (38%), mostly retrospective (62%), and predominantly used patient files (62%). The median sample size was 1291. Prognostic models dominated (69%), primarily targeting mortality (50%). Ensemble methods were most common (50%). The median AUROC was 0.81 (IQR 0.78-0.83). Most models were at a clinical Readiness Level 3-4 (81%). Barriers and facilitators related to data (65%, 34% respectively), implementation (50%, 77%), technology (31%, 42%), and human (19%, 35%) were reported.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We provided evidence of ML's promising performance for LMICs. Mortality prediction was the main focus. Arriving at clinical applications that benefit LMICs, requires investment in high-quality data and alignment to local (clinical) needs.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This project is part of the EDCTP2 programme (grant number RIA2020I-3294 IMPALA) supported by the European Union.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103743"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12818084/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}