Pub Date : 2025-12-17eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103707
Anne Quinquenel, Rémi Letestu, Magali Le Garff-Tavernier, Stéphane Morisset, Fabien Subtil, Thérèse Aurran, Kamel Laribi, Florence Cymbalista, Vincent Lévy, Laurence Simon, Damien Roos-Weil, Véronique Leblond, Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy, Cécile Tomowiak, Caroline Dartigeas, Romain Guièze, Olivier Tournilhac, Emmanuelle Ferrant, Sophie de Guibert, Pierre Feugier, Fatiha Merabet, Stéphane Leprêtre, Philippe Carassou, Julie Gay, Bénédicte Hivert, Luc-Matthieu Fornecker, Jehan Dupuis, Lysiane Molina, Bruno Villemagne, Guillaume Cartron, Bernard Drenou, Beatrice Mahé, Omar Benbrahim, Xavier Cahu, Christelle Portois, Loïc Ysebaert, Florence Nguyen-Khac, Abdelmalek Dahmani, Claire Quiney, Valérie Rouillé, Alain Delmer, Anne-Sophie Michallet
Background: For chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and intermediate risk factors (unmutated IGHV and/or 11q deletion and/or complex karyotype; no TP53 alteration), the best first-line treatment is unclear. We compared an MRD-guided, fixed-duration ibrutinib-venetoclax (IV) regimen to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) in this population.
Methods: The ERADIC randomised, phase 2 trial (NCT04010968), conducted at 35 French hospitals, recruited previously untreated, fit adults with intermediate-risk CLL. Randomisation was 1:1 to: 6x4-weekly cycles of FCR (Months 1-6); or ibrutinib 420 mg/day from Month 1 plus venetoclax (ramp-up to 400 mg/day from Month 4) for a duration depending on the bone marrow measurable residual disease level at Month 9 (if undetectable at a threshold of <0·01% [BM uMRD4] to Month 15; otherwise to Month 27). Primary outcome was the BM uMRD4 rate at Month 27, by assessment oligocentrally (intent-to-treat, worst-case scenario method).
Findings: Between 27 September 2019 and 31 January 2021, 120 patients were enrolled (73% male). At Month 27, the BM uMRD4 rate was 37% (22/59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 25, 51) with IV versus 13% (8/61; 95% CI 6, 24) with FCR. The high amount of missing BM MRD data, along with imbalance in missing data between arms, meant that no confirmatory statistics were performed. Best rate of BM uMRD4 plus peripheral blood uMRD5 was 47% (22/47) with IV versus 19% (8/43) with FCR (p = 0·0090). With median 43 months' follow-up, progression-free survival was longer with IV versus FCR (estimated hazard ratio 0·35, 95% CI 0·16, 0·80, p = 0·012). By Month 27, six deaths had occurred (FCR: acute myeloid leukaemia, septic shock, myelodysplastic syndrome; IV: 2 sudden deaths, COVID-19). By the time of follow-up, the most common serious grade 3/4 events were infections and haematological toxicities with FCR, and infections and cardiovascular/metabolic toxicities with IV.
Interpretation: Due to the high amount of missing BM MRD data at Month 27, the primary outcome statistical analysis was not deemed feasible. The outcomes reported are secondary and exploratory, and were not been powered for in the study design. A patient profile suitable for an MRD-guided, fixed-duration IV regimen requires consideration of potential toxicities.
Funding: Abbvie and Janssen France.
背景:对于慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)和中间危险因素(未突变的IGHV和/或11q缺失和/或复杂核型;无TP53改变),最佳一线治疗尚不清楚。在这一人群中,我们比较了mrd指导下的固定时间伊鲁替尼-维托克拉(IV)方案和氟达拉滨-环磷酰胺-利妥昔单抗(FCR)方案。方法:ERADIC随机2期试验(NCT04010968)在35家法国医院进行,招募先前未治疗的中等风险CLL成人患者。随机化为1:1至:6x4周FCR周期(1-6个月);或依鲁替尼420 mg/天,从第1个月开始加venetoclax(从第4个月开始增加到400 mg/天),持续时间取决于第9个月时骨髓可测量的残留疾病水平(如果在结果阈值下无法检测到):2019年9月27日至2021年1月31日,入组120例患者(73%为男性)。在第27个月,IV组的BM uMRD4率为37%(22/59;95%可信区间[CI] 25,51),而FCR组为13%(8/61;95%可信区间[CI] 6,24)。BM MRD数据的大量缺失,以及各组间缺失数据的不平衡,意味着没有进行验证性统计。IV组bmumrd4 +外周血uMRD5的最佳阳性率为47% (22/47),FCR组为19% (8/43)(p = 0.0090)。随访中位数为43个月,IV组的无进展生存期比FCR组更长(估计风险比0.35,95% CI 0.16, 0.80, p = 0.012)。截至第27个月,共发生6例死亡(FCR:急性髓性白血病、感染性休克、骨髓增生异常综合征;IV: 2例猝死、COVID-19)。到随访时,最常见的严重3/4级事件是FCR患者的感染和血液学毒性,iv患者的感染和心血管/代谢毒性。解释:由于27个月时BM MRD数据大量缺失,主要结局统计分析被认为是不可行的。报告的结果是次要的和探索性的,在研究设计中没有得到支持。适合mrd引导的固定时间静脉注射方案的患者概况需要考虑潜在的毒性。资助:艾伯维和杨森法国。
{"title":"Measurable residual disease-guided combination of ibrutinib plus venetoclax versus FCR in previously untreated patients with intermediate-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase 2, randomised trial (ERADIC) from the FILO group.","authors":"Anne Quinquenel, Rémi Letestu, Magali Le Garff-Tavernier, Stéphane Morisset, Fabien Subtil, Thérèse Aurran, Kamel Laribi, Florence Cymbalista, Vincent Lévy, Laurence Simon, Damien Roos-Weil, Véronique Leblond, Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy, Cécile Tomowiak, Caroline Dartigeas, Romain Guièze, Olivier Tournilhac, Emmanuelle Ferrant, Sophie de Guibert, Pierre Feugier, Fatiha Merabet, Stéphane Leprêtre, Philippe Carassou, Julie Gay, Bénédicte Hivert, Luc-Matthieu Fornecker, Jehan Dupuis, Lysiane Molina, Bruno Villemagne, Guillaume Cartron, Bernard Drenou, Beatrice Mahé, Omar Benbrahim, Xavier Cahu, Christelle Portois, Loïc Ysebaert, Florence Nguyen-Khac, Abdelmalek Dahmani, Claire Quiney, Valérie Rouillé, Alain Delmer, Anne-Sophie Michallet","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103707","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and intermediate risk factors (unmutated <i>IGHV</i> and/or 11q deletion and/or complex karyotype; no <i>TP53</i> alteration), the best first-line treatment is unclear. We compared an MRD-guided, fixed-duration ibrutinib-venetoclax (IV) regimen to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ERADIC randomised, phase 2 trial (NCT04010968), conducted at 35 French hospitals, recruited previously untreated, fit adults with intermediate-risk CLL. Randomisation was 1:1 to: 6x4-weekly cycles of FCR (Months 1-6); or ibrutinib 420 mg/day from Month 1 plus venetoclax (ramp-up to 400 mg/day from Month 4) for a duration depending on the bone marrow measurable residual disease level at Month 9 (if undetectable at a threshold of <0·01% [BM uMRD4] to Month 15; otherwise to Month 27). Primary outcome was the BM uMRD4 rate at Month 27, by assessment oligocentrally (intent-to-treat, worst-case scenario method).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between 27 September 2019 and 31 January 2021, 120 patients were enrolled (73% male). At Month 27, the BM uMRD4 rate was 37% (22/59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 25, 51) with IV versus 13% (8/61; 95% CI 6, 24) with FCR. The high amount of missing BM MRD data, along with imbalance in missing data between arms, meant that no confirmatory statistics were performed. Best rate of BM uMRD4 plus peripheral blood uMRD5 was 47% (22/47) with IV versus 19% (8/43) with FCR (p = 0·0090). With median 43 months' follow-up, progression-free survival was longer with IV versus FCR (estimated hazard ratio 0·35, 95% CI 0·16, 0·80, p = 0·012). By Month 27, six deaths had occurred (FCR: acute myeloid leukaemia, septic shock, myelodysplastic syndrome; IV: 2 sudden deaths, COVID-19). By the time of follow-up, the most common serious grade 3/4 events were infections and haematological toxicities with FCR, and infections and cardiovascular/metabolic toxicities with IV.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Due to the high amount of missing BM MRD data at Month 27, the primary outcome statistical analysis was not deemed feasible. The outcomes reported are secondary and exploratory, and were not been powered for in the study design. A patient profile suitable for an MRD-guided, fixed-duration IV regimen requires consideration of potential toxicities.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Abbvie and Janssen France.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103707"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12770953/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103649
Zhanna Oganesova, Helen L MacLaughlin, Kieran McCafferty, Sebastian Potthoff, Sharlene Greenwood, Victoria Vickerstaff, Rachel L Batterham, Sarah A Afuwape, Reza Motallebzadeh, Adrian Brown
Background: Obesity increases the risk of developing chronic kidney disease and progression to kidney failure (KF) and precludes kidney transplantation (KT). Challenges exist in people with KF losing weight to access KT, therefore understanding patients' and clinicians lived experiences of obesity management is crucial to improving equitable access to KT. This review aimed to synthesise qualitative and quantitative evidence to better understand patients' and clinicians' experiences of obesity management in KF prior to transplantation.
Methods: This mixed-methods systematic review followed the integrated methodological framework by the Joanna Briggs Institute. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Sciences were searched from 1st January 1980 to 16th April 2025 for studies investigating patients' and clinicians' perspectives on obesity management in KF. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies published in English in which patients or clinicians reported on their experiences of obesity management in kidney failure were included. Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Summary data were extracted from published reports and quantitative data underwent transformation into 'qualitised' data, Qualitative findings and qualitised survey results were analysed inductively using thematic synthesis. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024510237. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018 was used to evaluate the quality of selected studies.
Findings: Of 6525 records identified, 5203 remained after de-duplication and 7 studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 738 participants The overall quality of the studies was low and only one study scored highly on the quality assessment. Four main themes were constructed 1) Hungry and exhausted: The impact of dialysis on eating behaviour and activity (six studies [n = 339]) 2) Weight stigma-lack of support, trust and open communication (five studies [n = 212]) 3) Lack of resources as a barrier for weight loss (six studies [n = 339]) 4) Who gets a transplant? Moving beyond BMI to improve equity in transplantation (four studies [n = 631]).
Interpretation: Significant barriers to accessing and delivering obesity management were identified. When interpreting the results it should be appreciated that the overall quality of the studies was low. and clinician perspectives were limited to dietitians, nephrologists and transplant surgeons. To address these barriers, targeted strategies are recommended, such as enhanced training for health professional on obesity and communication about weight and weight stigma. There is an urgent paradigm shift needed to ensure equitable access to obesity management for people with obesity and KF.
Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research.
{"title":"Patient and clinician perspectives on the management of obesity in kidney failure prior to kidney transplantation: a mixed-methods systematic review.","authors":"Zhanna Oganesova, Helen L MacLaughlin, Kieran McCafferty, Sebastian Potthoff, Sharlene Greenwood, Victoria Vickerstaff, Rachel L Batterham, Sarah A Afuwape, Reza Motallebzadeh, Adrian Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103649","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103649","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity increases the risk of developing chronic kidney disease and progression to kidney failure (KF) and precludes kidney transplantation (KT). Challenges exist in people with KF losing weight to access KT, therefore understanding patients' and clinicians lived experiences of obesity management is crucial to improving equitable access to KT. This review aimed to synthesise qualitative and quantitative evidence to better understand patients' and clinicians' experiences of obesity management in KF prior to transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods systematic review followed the integrated methodological framework by the Joanna Briggs Institute. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Sciences were searched from 1st January 1980 to 16th April 2025 for studies investigating patients' and clinicians' perspectives on obesity management in KF. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies published in English in which patients or clinicians reported on their experiences of obesity management in kidney failure were included. Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Summary data were extracted from published reports and quantitative data underwent transformation into 'qualitised' data, Qualitative findings and qualitised survey results were analysed inductively using thematic synthesis. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024510237. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018 was used to evaluate the quality of selected studies.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 6525 records identified, 5203 remained after de-duplication and 7 studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 738 participants The overall quality of the studies was low and only one study scored highly on the quality assessment. Four main themes were constructed 1) Hungry and exhausted: The impact of dialysis on eating behaviour and activity (six studies [n = 339]) 2) Weight stigma-lack of support, trust and open communication (five studies [n = 212]) 3) Lack of resources as a barrier for weight loss (six studies [n = 339]) 4) Who gets a transplant? Moving beyond BMI to improve equity in transplantation (four studies [n = 631]).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Significant barriers to accessing and delivering obesity management were identified. When interpreting the results it should be appreciated that the overall quality of the studies was low. and clinician perspectives were limited to dietitians, nephrologists and transplant surgeons. To address these barriers, targeted strategies are recommended, such as enhanced training for health professional on obesity and communication about weight and weight stigma. There is an urgent paradigm shift needed to ensure equitable access to obesity management for people with obesity and KF.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103649"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12770947/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103677
Leiling Liu, Zhiqi Li, Wenrui Ye, Pu Peng, Yurong Wang, Luqing Wan, Jiangnan Li, Mei Zhang, Yihua Wang, Runqi Liu, Danyan Xu, Jingjing Zhang
{"title":"Response to Letter by Dr. Verbeck.","authors":"Leiling Liu, Zhiqi Li, Wenrui Ye, Pu Peng, Yurong Wang, Luqing Wan, Jiangnan Li, Mei Zhang, Yihua Wang, Runqi Liu, Danyan Xu, Jingjing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103677","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103677","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103677"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768938/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: To investigate the efficacy and safety of adding tislelizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin (TP) followed by adjuvant tislelizumab for early TNBC to explore the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy backbone and courses.
Methods: The cTRIO study (ChiCTR2100041675) is a multicenter, prospective, open-label phase II trial across 8 sites in China, evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus TP followed by adjuvant tislelizumab in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We included women aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed early TNBC defined by estrogen receptor immunohistochemistry (IHC) with T1 N1-3 or T2-4 N0-3 stage. Participants received six cycles of neoadjuvant tislelizumab (200 mg on day 1) plus nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin (TP; 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8), definitive surgery 3-6 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, followed by adjuvant tislelizumab every 3 weeks for 1 year. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR).
Findings: Sixty-two patients were enrolled from March 2021 to October 2022, including 44 cases with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive and 9 cases at N3. At final analysis, 35/62 patients had achieved pathologic complete response (pCR, 56%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-69%), with 33% (3/9) of N3 cases achieving pCR. The 3-year EFS and OS rates were 82.2% (95% CI, 70.2%-89.7%) and 87.7% (95% CI, 75.6%-94.0%), respectively. The incidence rates of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were 53% (33/62) and 5% (3/62), respectively. Patients with a higher PD-L1 combined positive score were less likely to experience relapse (P = 0.0090).
Interpretation: Despite being a de-escalating and anthracycline-free neoadjuvant treatment approach, the triplet combination therapy showed promising efficacy and safety, signifying a crucial step toward the optimization of chemoimmunotherapy for early TNBC.
Funding: This study was supported by BeOne Medicines, Ltd.
{"title":"Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin for triple-negative breast cancer: a multicenter, open-label, phase II cTRIO study.","authors":"Fei Wang, Xiaopeng Hao, Cuizhi Geng, Ying Lin, Zhenzhen Liu, Peifen Fu, Qiang Liu, Zhigang Yu, Zefei Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103709","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103709","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of adding tislelizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin (TP) followed by adjuvant tislelizumab for early TNBC to explore the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy backbone and courses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cTRIO study (ChiCTR2100041675) is a multicenter, prospective, open-label phase II trial across 8 sites in China, evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus TP followed by adjuvant tislelizumab in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We included women aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed early TNBC defined by estrogen receptor immunohistochemistry (IHC) with T1 N1-3 or T2-4 N0-3 stage. Participants received six cycles of neoadjuvant tislelizumab (200 mg on day 1) plus nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin (TP; 125 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1 and 8), definitive surgery 3-6 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, followed by adjuvant tislelizumab every 3 weeks for 1 year. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Sixty-two patients were enrolled from March 2021 to October 2022, including 44 cases with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive and 9 cases at N3. At final analysis, 35/62 patients had achieved pathologic complete response (pCR, 56%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-69%), with 33% (3/9) of N3 cases achieving pCR. The 3-year EFS and OS rates were 82.2% (95% CI, 70.2%-89.7%) and 87.7% (95% CI, 75.6%-94.0%), respectively. The incidence rates of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were 53% (33/62) and 5% (3/62), respectively. Patients with a higher PD-L1 combined positive score were less likely to experience relapse (<i>P</i> = 0.0090).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite being a de-escalating and anthracycline-free neoadjuvant treatment approach, the triplet combination therapy showed promising efficacy and safety, signifying a crucial step toward the optimization of chemoimmunotherapy for early TNBC.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study was supported by BeOne Medicines, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103709"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768863/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103686
Vasileios Fragoulakis, Jesse J Swen, Margarita-Ioanna Koufaki, Kathrin Blagec, Tanja Blagus, Stefan Böhringer, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Erika Cecchin, Ka-Chun Cheung, Vera H M Deneer, Mathilde Dupui, Siv Jonsson, Candace Joefield-Roka, Katja S Just, Mats O Karlsson, Lidija Konta, Rudolf Koopmann, Marjolein Kriek, Thorsten Lehr, Lisanne E N Manson, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Victoria Rollinson, Rossana Roncato, Matthias Samwald, Elke Schaeffeler, Maria Skokou, Matthias Schwab, Daniela Steinberger, Julia C Stingl, Roman Tremmel, Richard M Turner, Mandy H van Rhenen, Cathelijne H van der Wouden, Cristina Lucía Dávila-Fajardo, Vita Dolžan, Munir Pirmohamed, Gere Sunder-Plassmann, Giuseppe Toffoli, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, George P Patrinos, Christina Mitropoulou
Background: Pharmacogenetics (PGx) aims to revolutionize healthcare by individualizing drug doses and medication choices. However, clinical uptake will require positive evaluation evidence of both clinical utility and cost-effectiveness. We have recently demonstrated the clinical utility of this approach, using a panel-based PGx-guided treatment of patients from various indications recruited in seven countries (PREPARE study).
Methods: Here, we provide economic evidence from a multinational cost-utility analysis of PGx-guided treatment in 6930 patients participating in the PREPARE study. The study was conducted from March 2017 to June 2020. We used the national healthcare system's perspective in each participating country, including only direct medical costs that budget holders cover. A Visual Analog Scale was used to measure utility and the quality of life was estimated by averaging the Visual Analog Scale scores of participants over four specific time points in the study, namely baseline visit (day 1), week 4, week 12, and 18 months from the baseline visit.
Findings: Our analysis showed that the PGx-guided treatment is marginally cost-effective at the threshold of €11,000 QALYs. Cost drivers were hospitalization and ADRs costs, accounting for most of the resources used in both groups (46% and 37.5% in the PGx-guided group versus 49% and 48% in the control group, respectively), as a result of the average duration of hospitalization [1.51 days (95% CI: 1.23-1.82) for the PGx-guided group and 2.37 days (95% CI: 1.95-2.89) for the control group, resulting in a mean difference of 0.86 days (95% CI: 0.37-1.44). The difference in QALYs gained was 0.00178 (95% CI: 0.00176-0.00180). The ICER was €12,020 (95% CI: €10,957-€13,356) per QALY on average (SD: €116). When comparing cost and effectiveness of actionable PGx-guided versus actionable control patients, the total cost for the PGx-guided group was €491 (95% CI: €384-€613), versus €767 (95% CI: €583-€982) in the control group, with an incremental cost difference of €276 (95% CI: €62-€511), favoring the PGx-guided group. Also, the difference in effectiveness was 0.007 QALYs (95% CI: -0.021 to 0.033). Lastly, the difference in the mean total cost was estimated to be €21.4 (95% CI: €19.5-€23.8), while without considering the PGx test cost, indicative of a pre-emptive genetic testing approach, the PGx-guided treatment becomes a cost-saving option, with an estimated savings of approximately €103.6 (€124-€21.4) per patient.
Interpretation: These data suggest that panel-based PGx testing is cost-effective, which, together with the clinically beneficial outcomes already demonstrated in the PREPARE study, provides additional evidence of the need to implement PGx into clinical practice.
{"title":"Multinational cost-utility analysis of panel-based pharmacogenetics-guided treatment of patients enrolled in the U-PGx PREPARE study.","authors":"Vasileios Fragoulakis, Jesse J Swen, Margarita-Ioanna Koufaki, Kathrin Blagec, Tanja Blagus, Stefan Böhringer, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Erika Cecchin, Ka-Chun Cheung, Vera H M Deneer, Mathilde Dupui, Siv Jonsson, Candace Joefield-Roka, Katja S Just, Mats O Karlsson, Lidija Konta, Rudolf Koopmann, Marjolein Kriek, Thorsten Lehr, Lisanne E N Manson, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Victoria Rollinson, Rossana Roncato, Matthias Samwald, Elke Schaeffeler, Maria Skokou, Matthias Schwab, Daniela Steinberger, Julia C Stingl, Roman Tremmel, Richard M Turner, Mandy H van Rhenen, Cathelijne H van der Wouden, Cristina Lucía Dávila-Fajardo, Vita Dolžan, Munir Pirmohamed, Gere Sunder-Plassmann, Giuseppe Toffoli, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, George P Patrinos, Christina Mitropoulou","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103686","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103686","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacogenetics (PGx) aims to revolutionize healthcare by individualizing drug doses and medication choices. However, clinical uptake will require positive evaluation evidence of both clinical utility and cost-effectiveness. We have recently demonstrated the clinical utility of this approach, using a panel-based PGx-guided treatment of patients from various indications recruited in seven countries (PREPARE study).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we provide economic evidence from a multinational cost-utility analysis of PGx-guided treatment in 6930 patients participating in the PREPARE study. The study was conducted from March 2017 to June 2020. We used the national healthcare system's perspective in each participating country, including only direct medical costs that budget holders cover. A Visual Analog Scale was used to measure utility and the quality of life was estimated by averaging the Visual Analog Scale scores of participants over four specific time points in the study, namely baseline visit (day 1), week 4, week 12, and 18 months from the baseline visit.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our analysis showed that the PGx-guided treatment is marginally cost-effective at the threshold of €11,000 QALYs. Cost drivers were hospitalization and ADRs costs, accounting for most of the resources used in both groups (46% and 37.5% in the PGx-guided group versus 49% and 48% in the control group, respectively), as a result of the average duration of hospitalization [1.51 days (95% CI: 1.23-1.82) for the PGx-guided group and 2.37 days (95% CI: 1.95-2.89) for the control group, resulting in a mean difference of 0.86 days (95% CI: 0.37-1.44). The difference in QALYs gained was 0.00178 (95% CI: 0.00176-0.00180). The ICER was €12,020 (95% CI: €10,957-€13,356) per QALY on average (SD: €116). When comparing cost and effectiveness of actionable PGx-guided versus actionable control patients, the total cost for the PGx-guided group was €491 (95% CI: €384-€613), versus €767 (95% CI: €583-€982) in the control group, with an incremental cost difference of €276 (95% CI: €62-€511), favoring the PGx-guided group. Also, the difference in effectiveness was 0.007 QALYs (95% CI: -0.021 to 0.033). Lastly, the difference in the mean total cost was estimated to be €21.4 (95% CI: €19.5-€23.8), while without considering the PGx test cost, indicative of a pre-emptive genetic testing approach, the PGx-guided treatment becomes a cost-saving option, with an estimated savings of approximately €103.6 (€124-€21.4) per patient.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>These data suggest that panel-based PGx testing is cost-effective, which, together with the clinically beneficial outcomes already demonstrated in the PREPARE study, provides additional evidence of the need to implement PGx into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>European Union Horizon 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"103686"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768869/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103669
Tao Ge, Hongyi Zhang, Xinsheng Zhu, Meixin Teng, Yifei Zhou, Suyu Wang, Dongliang Bian, Lele Zhang, Haiyang Hu, Qiji Guo, Jincheng Su, Shiqi Hu, Huansha Yu, Yirui Zhou, Jie Huang, Jie Yang, Yuming Zhu, Yi Bao, Minwei Bao, Xuefei Hu, Wenxin He, Peng Zhang
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 30% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have initially resectable disease. This trial aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of administering sintilimab-based induction therapy for potentially resectable stage III NSCLC to offer a more advantageous therapeutic strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigator-initiated, open-label, phase 2 trial (NCT04728724) aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of sintilimab-based induction therapy in patients with potentially resectable stage III NSCLC on the basis of tumour PD-L1 expression. Eligible patients with PD-L1 expression in at least 50% of tumour cells received four cycles of sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) as monotherapy, and patients with PD-L1 expression in less than 50% of tumour cells or of unknown status received four cycles of sintilimab combined with carboplatin-based chemotherapy before surgical resection. Evaluation of efficacy was conducted by a multidisciplinary team every two cycles. Surgical resection was performed within 21-28 days of the last dose. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response rate. Additionally, bulk RNA sequencing of baseline and surgical samples was conducted to investigate the tumour microenvironment and identify potential biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>100 patients were enrolled between November 16, 2022, and September 11, 2023, and 97 patients were included in analyses. 75 (77%) of 97 patients completed four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment (range 1-6 cycles). An overall response was observed in 80 patients (82%; 95% CI 75-90), and all had a partial response. Surgery was performed in 58 patients (60%), and all patients had R0 resection. 38 (66%, 95% CI 53-78) of 58 patients had a major pathological response. As of September 24, 2025, the median follow-up duration was 31.0 months (IQR 27.5-32.6), and median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. 24-month progression-free survival was 78% (95% CI 71-87), and 24-month overall survival was 88% (81-94). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 40 (41%) of 97 patients, and the most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (n = 35 [36%]), leukopenia (n = 18 [19%]). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 51 (53%) of 97 patients receiving study treatment. Differential gene expression analysis in the combination of baseline and surgical tumour samples revealed the upregulation of immune-related genes in responders to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade, and the upregulation of metabolism-related genes in non-responders.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Sintilimab-based induction treatment strategy could be a feasible option for potentially resectable NSCLC patients with stage III disease. Notably, we found that increased plasma cell signatures were predictive of response, while elevated AKR1C family gene expression substantially co
背景:大约30%的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者最初是可切除的。本试验旨在评估以辛替利单抗为基础的诱导治疗潜在可切除的III期NSCLC的安全性和可行性,以提供更有利的治疗策略。方法:这项由研究者发起的、开放标签的2期试验(NCT04728724)旨在探讨基于肿瘤PD-L1表达的西替利单抗诱导治疗在可能可切除的III期NSCLC患者中的有效性和安全性。在至少50%的肿瘤细胞中PD-L1表达的符合条件的患者接受4个周期的辛替单抗单药治疗(每3周200 mg),而PD-L1表达低于50%的肿瘤细胞或状态未知的患者在手术切除前接受4个周期的辛替单抗联合卡铂化疗。疗效评估由多学科小组每两个周期进行一次。最后一次给药后21 ~ 28天内进行手术切除。主要终点为主要病理反应率。此外,对基线和手术样本进行了大量RNA测序,以研究肿瘤微环境并识别潜在的生物标志物。研究结果:100名患者在2022年11月16日至2023年9月11日期间入组,其中97名患者纳入分析。97例患者中有75例(77%)完成了4个周期的新辅助治疗(范围1-6个周期)。80例患者(82%;95% CI 75-90)出现总体缓解,所有患者均出现部分缓解。58例(60%)患者接受手术,所有患者均行R0切除。58例患者中有38例(66%,95% CI 53-78)出现主要病理反应。截至2025年9月24日,中位随访时间为31.0个月(IQR为27.5-32.6),中位无进展生存期和总生存期均未达到。24个月无进展生存率为78% (95% CI 71-87), 24个月总生存率为88%(81-94)。97例患者中有40例(41%)发生3级及以上治疗相关不良事件,最常见的3-4级治疗相关不良事件为中性粒细胞减少症(n = 35[36%])、白细胞减少症(n = 18[19%])。接受研究治疗的97例患者中有51例(53%)发生免疫相关不良事件。基线和手术肿瘤样本的差异基因表达分析显示,免疫相关基因在新辅助免疫检查点阻断的应答者中上调,而代谢相关基因在无应答者中上调。结论:以辛替利单抗为基础的诱导治疗策略可能是可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌患者的可行选择。值得注意的是,我们发现增加的浆细胞特征可以预测应答,而升高的AKR1C家族基因表达与免疫检查点阻断的抵抗有很大的相关性。基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(82430053);上海市科学技术委员会(资助号:24SF1904500);上海市教委创新计划项目(批准号:2023ZKZD33);AI for Science);同济大学“医学- x”跨学科研究计划项目(批准号:2025-0554-ZD-03);上海市肺科医院基金资助(批准号:;LYRC202402 FKLY20004)。
{"title":"Efficiency and safety of sintilimab-based induction therapy in potentially resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (LungMate-009): an open-label, phase 2 trial.","authors":"Tao Ge, Hongyi Zhang, Xinsheng Zhu, Meixin Teng, Yifei Zhou, Suyu Wang, Dongliang Bian, Lele Zhang, Haiyang Hu, Qiji Guo, Jincheng Su, Shiqi Hu, Huansha Yu, Yirui Zhou, Jie Huang, Jie Yang, Yuming Zhu, Yi Bao, Minwei Bao, Xuefei Hu, Wenxin He, Peng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103669","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 30% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have initially resectable disease. This trial aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of administering sintilimab-based induction therapy for potentially resectable stage III NSCLC to offer a more advantageous therapeutic strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigator-initiated, open-label, phase 2 trial (NCT04728724) aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of sintilimab-based induction therapy in patients with potentially resectable stage III NSCLC on the basis of tumour PD-L1 expression. Eligible patients with PD-L1 expression in at least 50% of tumour cells received four cycles of sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) as monotherapy, and patients with PD-L1 expression in less than 50% of tumour cells or of unknown status received four cycles of sintilimab combined with carboplatin-based chemotherapy before surgical resection. Evaluation of efficacy was conducted by a multidisciplinary team every two cycles. Surgical resection was performed within 21-28 days of the last dose. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response rate. Additionally, bulk RNA sequencing of baseline and surgical samples was conducted to investigate the tumour microenvironment and identify potential biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>100 patients were enrolled between November 16, 2022, and September 11, 2023, and 97 patients were included in analyses. 75 (77%) of 97 patients completed four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment (range 1-6 cycles). An overall response was observed in 80 patients (82%; 95% CI 75-90), and all had a partial response. Surgery was performed in 58 patients (60%), and all patients had R0 resection. 38 (66%, 95% CI 53-78) of 58 patients had a major pathological response. As of September 24, 2025, the median follow-up duration was 31.0 months (IQR 27.5-32.6), and median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. 24-month progression-free survival was 78% (95% CI 71-87), and 24-month overall survival was 88% (81-94). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 40 (41%) of 97 patients, and the most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (n = 35 [36%]), leukopenia (n = 18 [19%]). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 51 (53%) of 97 patients receiving study treatment. Differential gene expression analysis in the combination of baseline and surgical tumour samples revealed the upregulation of immune-related genes in responders to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade, and the upregulation of metabolism-related genes in non-responders.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Sintilimab-based induction treatment strategy could be a feasible option for potentially resectable NSCLC patients with stage III disease. Notably, we found that increased plasma cell signatures were predictive of response, while elevated AKR1C family gene expression substantially co","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103669"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12752746/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145877803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103684
Shiyao Cheng, Yuandan Wei, Huaguang Zheng, Qingrong Zhang, Xuanyan Yang, Zhen Lu, Zehua Huang, Zijun Wan, Yanfeng Shi, Jie Zhang, Jay Chol Choi, Chul-Hoo Kang, Hong Jun Kim, Joong-Goo Kim, Hee-Joon Bae, Juneyoung Lee, Jeong-Yoon Lee, Hannah Jung, Cang Guo, Xiaoling Liao, Jianping Wu, Xia Meng, Zixiao Li, Stéphanie Debette, Hao Li, Yongjun Wang, Si Cheng, Siyang Liu
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability globally, with high rates of adverse outcomes. We aimed to develop and test a clinically accessible and explainable predictive model for post-stroke composite outcomes that could identify patients at high-risk for targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This modelling study used artificial intelligence to develop and validate a prognostic predictive model for post-stroke outcomes at 3 months and over 5 years, using comprehensive data from the third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III; 2015-2018). The development cohort comprised 11,313 patients from CNSR-III. Validation cohort 1 (n = 2627 from CNSR-III; internal validation) were selected at random on the basis of hospital assignment. Validation cohort 2 (external validation) included 5158 patients with a history of ischaemic stroke, excluding those diagnosed with TIA, from the CHANCE-2 trial (2019-2021) done at 202 centres in China. Validation cohort 3 (external validation: disability and mortality) involved 3855 patients with a history of acute ischaemic stroke or TIA from a single centre in the Clinical Research Center for Stroke-Fifth Division (CRCS-5) cohort (2011-2024) in South Korea. We evaluated 309 hospitalisation variables, including baseline characteristics, medical history, hospitalisation data, biomarkers, geographical factors, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and stroke polygenic risk scores, using an extreme gradient boosting tree model. Feature importance was assessed via Shapley values. Primary outcomes were 3-month stroke recurrence, disability (mRS >2), and mortality. Secondary outcomes were assessed at six additional time points over 5 years. A nested cross-validation scheme was employed for feature selection and internal validation in 80% of patients (n = 11,313) from CNSR-III cohort. Testing was performed in the remaining 20% of patients (n = 2627) from CNSR-III (validation cohort 1). External validation was performed in validation cohorts 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Global and domain-specific delta-NIHSS<sub>(admission-discharge)</sub> emerged as the strongest predictor of stroke recurrence, disability, and mortality. The Delta-NIHSS-based Predictor for Post-Stroke Composite Outcomes (DISCO) model, integrating 16 delta-NIHSS<sub>(admission-to-discharge)</sub> measures, age, gender, TOAST subtypes, history of TIA, stroke, diabetes and mRS at discharge, achieved the area under the receiver operating curve (AUCs) of 0.805 and 0.815 for recurrence and mortality and of 0.852 for disability at 3 months in validation cohort 2. The 1% patients with highest-risk exhibited a 19.27-fold relative risk (RR) for recurrence, 36.59-fold RR for disability, and 225.5-fold RR for mortality at 3 months. The DISCO model is available at https://www.discosysu.cn.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The DISCO model, incorp
{"title":"Artifical intelligence-powered delta-NIHSS-based model for predicting recurrence, disability and mortality after acute ischaemic strokes (DISCO): a modelling study.","authors":"Shiyao Cheng, Yuandan Wei, Huaguang Zheng, Qingrong Zhang, Xuanyan Yang, Zhen Lu, Zehua Huang, Zijun Wan, Yanfeng Shi, Jie Zhang, Jay Chol Choi, Chul-Hoo Kang, Hong Jun Kim, Joong-Goo Kim, Hee-Joon Bae, Juneyoung Lee, Jeong-Yoon Lee, Hannah Jung, Cang Guo, Xiaoling Liao, Jianping Wu, Xia Meng, Zixiao Li, Stéphanie Debette, Hao Li, Yongjun Wang, Si Cheng, Siyang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103684","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103684","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability globally, with high rates of adverse outcomes. We aimed to develop and test a clinically accessible and explainable predictive model for post-stroke composite outcomes that could identify patients at high-risk for targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This modelling study used artificial intelligence to develop and validate a prognostic predictive model for post-stroke outcomes at 3 months and over 5 years, using comprehensive data from the third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III; 2015-2018). The development cohort comprised 11,313 patients from CNSR-III. Validation cohort 1 (n = 2627 from CNSR-III; internal validation) were selected at random on the basis of hospital assignment. Validation cohort 2 (external validation) included 5158 patients with a history of ischaemic stroke, excluding those diagnosed with TIA, from the CHANCE-2 trial (2019-2021) done at 202 centres in China. Validation cohort 3 (external validation: disability and mortality) involved 3855 patients with a history of acute ischaemic stroke or TIA from a single centre in the Clinical Research Center for Stroke-Fifth Division (CRCS-5) cohort (2011-2024) in South Korea. We evaluated 309 hospitalisation variables, including baseline characteristics, medical history, hospitalisation data, biomarkers, geographical factors, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and stroke polygenic risk scores, using an extreme gradient boosting tree model. Feature importance was assessed via Shapley values. Primary outcomes were 3-month stroke recurrence, disability (mRS >2), and mortality. Secondary outcomes were assessed at six additional time points over 5 years. A nested cross-validation scheme was employed for feature selection and internal validation in 80% of patients (n = 11,313) from CNSR-III cohort. Testing was performed in the remaining 20% of patients (n = 2627) from CNSR-III (validation cohort 1). External validation was performed in validation cohorts 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Global and domain-specific delta-NIHSS<sub>(admission-discharge)</sub> emerged as the strongest predictor of stroke recurrence, disability, and mortality. The Delta-NIHSS-based Predictor for Post-Stroke Composite Outcomes (DISCO) model, integrating 16 delta-NIHSS<sub>(admission-to-discharge)</sub> measures, age, gender, TOAST subtypes, history of TIA, stroke, diabetes and mRS at discharge, achieved the area under the receiver operating curve (AUCs) of 0.805 and 0.815 for recurrence and mortality and of 0.852 for disability at 3 months in validation cohort 2. The 1% patients with highest-risk exhibited a 19.27-fold relative risk (RR) for recurrence, 36.59-fold RR for disability, and 225.5-fold RR for mortality at 3 months. The DISCO model is available at https://www.discosysu.cn.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The DISCO model, incorp","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103684"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12753274/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145877779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103671
Dongmei Tang, Dantong Gu, Jiamin Gong, Guangyu Liu, Lei Zhou, Aqiang Dai, Yan Huo, Pengfei Guan, Jianning Zhang, Xinsheng Huang, Yunfeng Wang, Shan Sun, Huawei Li
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tinnitus is a common and often debilitating auditory condition with limited treatment options. While sound therapy is widely used, robust evidence from long-term randomised trials is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the 9-month efficacy and 3-month posttreatment durability of four sound therapies for adults with chronic subjective tinnitus and identify predictors of response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial, participants (aged 18-80 years) with chronic subjective tinnitus from three academic hospitals in China were included. Participants were randomly 1:1:1:1 assigned to receive one of four daily 2-h interventions: unmodified music (UM), UM plus pitch-centered narrowband noise (UM + NBN), high-frequency-enhanced music (HFEM), or digital frequency-customised relieving sound (DFCRS). Primary outcome was tinnitus severity assessed by Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). Assessments occurred at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 months, with a 3-month posttreatment follow-up. Two prespecified primary endpoints were defined: (a) complete remission, operationalised as a THI score of 0 at any follow-up visit within the 9-month period. Participants achieving this endpoint were considered clinically cured, and sound therapy was discontinued; or (b) if complete remission was not achieved by the end of 9 months, the magnitude of improvement was defined as the change in THI score from baseline to the 9-month endpoint. The primary analysis followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000039007.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 14, 2021, and November 30, 2022, 440 participants (median age 45 years [IQR, 35-56]; 222/440 [50·5%] male; median tinnitus duration 13 months [IQR, 7-36]) were enrolled and randomly assigned (UM, n = 111; UM + NBN, n = 110; HFEM, n = 108; DFCRS, n = 111). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. Only one participant in the HFEM group achieved complete remission, with a THI score of 0 at the 6-month follow-up. THI scores significantly decreased over time in all groups (median 50·00 [IQR 36·00-62·00]) at baseline to 9-month follow-up (35·00 [24·00-48·00]; <i>p</i> < 0·0001), with effects sustained posttreatment. Significant group × time interactions occurred (UM: F<sub>(5, 618)</sub> = 11·45; UM + NBN: F<sub>(5, 605)</sub> = 7·17; HFEM: F<sub>(5, 599)</sub> = 8·3; DFCRS: F<sub>(5, 619)</sub> = 12·65; all <i>p</i> < 0·0001) in all arms. DFCRS demonstrated superior efficacy (parameter estimate -4·37, 95% CI -6·25 to -2·48; <i>p</i> < 0·0001), when compared to UM as reference. No adverse events were reported in any group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In this exploratory trial, personalised acoustic therapy may provide promising efficacy for chronic tinnitus. Although interpretation is tempered by the absence of a blank control arm and o
背景:耳鸣是一种常见且常使人衰弱的听觉疾病,治疗方法有限。虽然声音疗法被广泛使用,但来自长期随机试验的有力证据很少。我们旨在评估四种声音疗法对成人慢性主观性耳鸣的9个月疗效和治疗后3个月的持久性,并确定反应的预测因素。方法:在这项多中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验中,来自中国三所学术医院的慢性主观性耳鸣患者(年龄18-80岁)被纳入研究。参与者被随机1:1:1:1分配接受四种每日2小时干预之一:未经修改的音乐(UM), UM加以音高为中心的窄带噪声(UM + NBN),高频增强音乐(HFEM)或数字频率定制缓解声音(DFCRS)。主要终点是耳鸣障碍量表(THI)评估耳鸣严重程度。评估发生在基线、1、2、3、6和9个月,治疗后随访3个月。定义了两个预先指定的主要终点:(a)完全缓解,在9个月内的任何随访中,THI评分为0。达到这个终点的参与者被认为是临床治愈,声音治疗停止;或(b)如果在9个月结束时未达到完全缓解,则改善的幅度定义为THI评分从基线到9个月终点的变化。初步分析遵循意向治疗(ITT)原则,该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ChiCTR2000039007。研究结果:在2021年5月14日至2022年11月30日期间,440名参与者(中位年龄45岁[IQR, 35-56]; 222/440[50.5%]男性;中位耳鸣持续时间13个月[IQR, 7-36])被纳入并随机分配(UM, n = 111; UM + NBN, n = 110; HFEM, n = 108; DFCRS, n = 111)。各组之间的基线特征平衡。在6个月的随访中,HFEM组中只有一名参与者达到了完全缓解,THI评分为0。在基线至9个月随访期间(35·00[24·00-48·00];p < 0.0001),各组THI评分均随时间显著下降(中位数为50·00 [IQR 36.00 -62·00]),治疗后效果持续。显著组×时间交互作用发生(UM: F(5,618) = 11·45;Um + nbn: f(5,605) = 7·17;Hfem: f(5,599) = 8·3;Dfcrs: f(5,619) = 12·65;所有实验组均p < 0.0001)。与作为参考的UM相比,DFCRS显示出更好的疗效(参数估计- 4.37,95% CI - 6.25至- 2.48;p < 0.0001)。两组均无不良事件报告。解释:在这项探索性试验中,个性化声学治疗可能为慢性耳鸣提供有希望的疗效。虽然由于缺乏空白对照组和客观依从性监测,解释受到了限制,但这些局限性突出了未来研究改进方法和更有力地验证治疗益处的机会。资助:国家科技部、上海市申康发展中心、上海市科学技术委员会、国家自然科学基金。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of a modified sound therapy for patients with subjective tinnitus (MOST): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Dongmei Tang, Dantong Gu, Jiamin Gong, Guangyu Liu, Lei Zhou, Aqiang Dai, Yan Huo, Pengfei Guan, Jianning Zhang, Xinsheng Huang, Yunfeng Wang, Shan Sun, Huawei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103671","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tinnitus is a common and often debilitating auditory condition with limited treatment options. While sound therapy is widely used, robust evidence from long-term randomised trials is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the 9-month efficacy and 3-month posttreatment durability of four sound therapies for adults with chronic subjective tinnitus and identify predictors of response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial, participants (aged 18-80 years) with chronic subjective tinnitus from three academic hospitals in China were included. Participants were randomly 1:1:1:1 assigned to receive one of four daily 2-h interventions: unmodified music (UM), UM plus pitch-centered narrowband noise (UM + NBN), high-frequency-enhanced music (HFEM), or digital frequency-customised relieving sound (DFCRS). Primary outcome was tinnitus severity assessed by Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). Assessments occurred at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 months, with a 3-month posttreatment follow-up. Two prespecified primary endpoints were defined: (a) complete remission, operationalised as a THI score of 0 at any follow-up visit within the 9-month period. Participants achieving this endpoint were considered clinically cured, and sound therapy was discontinued; or (b) if complete remission was not achieved by the end of 9 months, the magnitude of improvement was defined as the change in THI score from baseline to the 9-month endpoint. The primary analysis followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000039007.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 14, 2021, and November 30, 2022, 440 participants (median age 45 years [IQR, 35-56]; 222/440 [50·5%] male; median tinnitus duration 13 months [IQR, 7-36]) were enrolled and randomly assigned (UM, n = 111; UM + NBN, n = 110; HFEM, n = 108; DFCRS, n = 111). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. Only one participant in the HFEM group achieved complete remission, with a THI score of 0 at the 6-month follow-up. THI scores significantly decreased over time in all groups (median 50·00 [IQR 36·00-62·00]) at baseline to 9-month follow-up (35·00 [24·00-48·00]; <i>p</i> < 0·0001), with effects sustained posttreatment. Significant group × time interactions occurred (UM: F<sub>(5, 618)</sub> = 11·45; UM + NBN: F<sub>(5, 605)</sub> = 7·17; HFEM: F<sub>(5, 599)</sub> = 8·3; DFCRS: F<sub>(5, 619)</sub> = 12·65; all <i>p</i> < 0·0001) in all arms. DFCRS demonstrated superior efficacy (parameter estimate -4·37, 95% CI -6·25 to -2·48; <i>p</i> < 0·0001), when compared to UM as reference. No adverse events were reported in any group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In this exploratory trial, personalised acoustic therapy may provide promising efficacy for chronic tinnitus. Although interpretation is tempered by the absence of a blank control arm and o","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103671"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766481/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103688
Tingyu Wang, Yuting Yan, Hui Wang, Ying Sun, Xiantao Liu, Rui Lyu, Wenjie Xiong, Gang An, Wei Liu, Yan Xu, Shuhui Deng, Qi Wang, Chenxing Du, Liang Huang, Dehui Zou, Yaozhong Zhao, Lugui Qiu, Zengjun Li, Shuhua Yi
Background: Effective time-limited therapies remain an unmet need in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). We evaluated a novel regimen combining ibrutinib with intermittent fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in patients with CLL.
Methods: This single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial was conducted at three centres in China. Eligible participants were adults (aged 18-65 years) with previously untreated CLL requiring therapy according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia criteria. The regimen consisted of ibrutinib (420 mg daily) combined with three cycles of FCR administered on days 1-3 of cycles 1, 5, and 9. After the completion of induction therapy, among patients who had achieved complete remission (CR) with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD): those without TP53 deletion or mutation could discontinue treatment; those with TP53 deletion or mutation continued maintenance therapy for 6 months before discontinuing treatment; all other patients continued ibrutinib until they achieved CR-uMRD, followed by an additional 6 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was CR rate at best response. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03980002.
Findings: Between June 1, 2019, and July 30, 2023, 50 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 55 months (IQR 40-65). The median age of participants was 57 years (IQR 48-62), and 36 (72%) were male. Among 47 patients with available IGHV data, 18 (38%) had unmutated IGHV. TP53 deletion/mutation were present in four (8%) patients. The CR rate, the primary outcome, was 70% (35/50) at best response. 18 patients (36%) achieved CR with undetectable MRD in both bone marrow and peripheral blood, discontinuing treatment post-induction. Four deaths occurred; one due to Richter's transformation, two from COVID-19, and one from cerebral infarction. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 13 (26%) patients, leucopenia in 11 (22%) patients, and lymphocytopenia in 12 (24%) patients. No therapy-related cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia were observed.
Interpretation: This regimen achieved deep remissions with manageable toxicity. Whilst acknowledging study limitations and that pathway inhibitors are the current standard of care, these findings provide proof-of-principle that this regimen could be a feasible, time-limited treatment option for CLL. Particularly in resource-limited healthcare systems where continuous novel agents are less accessible. Future studies should explore long-term durability beyond 5 years and validate MRD thresholds for treatment cessation.
Funding: National Nature Science Foundation of China, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, and Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation.
{"title":"Ibrutinib alternating with three cycles of interval fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in adults with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia as time-limited regimen: a single-arm, multicentre phase 2 trial in China.","authors":"Tingyu Wang, Yuting Yan, Hui Wang, Ying Sun, Xiantao Liu, Rui Lyu, Wenjie Xiong, Gang An, Wei Liu, Yan Xu, Shuhui Deng, Qi Wang, Chenxing Du, Liang Huang, Dehui Zou, Yaozhong Zhao, Lugui Qiu, Zengjun Li, Shuhua Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103688","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103688","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective time-limited therapies remain an unmet need in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). We evaluated a novel regimen combining ibrutinib with intermittent fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in patients with CLL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial was conducted at three centres in China. Eligible participants were adults (aged 18-65 years) with previously untreated CLL requiring therapy according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia criteria. The regimen consisted of ibrutinib (420 mg daily) combined with three cycles of FCR administered on days 1-3 of cycles 1, 5, and 9. After the completion of induction therapy, among patients who had achieved complete remission (CR) with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD): those without TP53 deletion or mutation could discontinue treatment; those with TP53 deletion or mutation continued maintenance therapy for 6 months before discontinuing treatment; all other patients continued ibrutinib until they achieved CR-uMRD, followed by an additional 6 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was CR rate at best response. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03980002.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between June 1, 2019, and July 30, 2023, 50 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 55 months (IQR 40-65). The median age of participants was 57 years (IQR 48-62), and 36 (72%) were male. Among 47 patients with available IGHV data, 18 (38%) had unmutated IGHV. TP53 deletion/mutation were present in four (8%) patients. The CR rate, the primary outcome, was 70% (35/50) at best response. 18 patients (36%) achieved CR with undetectable MRD in both bone marrow and peripheral blood, discontinuing treatment post-induction. Four deaths occurred; one due to Richter's transformation, two from COVID-19, and one from cerebral infarction. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 13 (26%) patients, leucopenia in 11 (22%) patients, and lymphocytopenia in 12 (24%) patients. No therapy-related cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia were observed.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This regimen achieved deep remissions with manageable toxicity. Whilst acknowledging study limitations and that pathway inhibitors are the current standard of care, these findings provide proof-of-principle that this regimen could be a feasible, time-limited treatment option for CLL. Particularly in resource-limited healthcare systems where continuous novel agents are less accessible. Future studies should explore long-term durability beyond 5 years and validate MRD thresholds for treatment cessation.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Nature Science Foundation of China, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, and Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103688"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766422/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05eCollection Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103690
Hyolim Kang, Ahyoung Lim, Andrew Clark, Felipe J Colón González, Hannah Eleanor Clapham, Jean-Paul Carrera, Jong-Hoon Kim, Megan Auzenbergs, Preethi Lakshminarayanan, Sandra López-Vergès, So Yoon Sim, Su Myat Han, Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Timothy Endy, Zulma M Cucunubá, W John Edmunds, Sushant Sahastrabuddhe, Oliver J Brady, Kaja Abbas
Background: Two chikungunya vaccines, Ixchiq and Vimkunya are licensed. In April 2025, Brazil is the first endemic country to license Ixchiq, but optimal age groups for vaccination remain unclear. Our aim is to model the public health impact of age-specific chikungunya outbreak response immunisation strategies in Brazil and infer broader implications for vaccine use case scenarios in outbreak prone regions.
Methods: We developed an age-structured transmission dynamic model calibrated with state-level Brazilian surveillance data for 2022 and long-term average annual force of infections. We simulated outbreak response immunisation strategies targeting ages 1-11, 12-17, 18-59, and ≥60 years for Ixchiq and Vimkunya across 11 out of 27 states in Brazil. We assessed vaccine impact by symptomatic cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted and number needed to vaccinate (NNV) based on vaccine protection against disease only and against both disease and infection.
Findings: Ixchiq and Vimkunya showed similar vaccine impact. Across strategies, vaccinating children 1-11 years yielded the lowest NNV for both vaccines, whereas vaccinating adults 18-59 years achieved the greatest absolute reduction in symptomatic cases, averting 62.5% (95% Uncertainty Intervals [UI]: 54.2-84.1) of total symptomatic cases with Vimkunya and 66.2% (58.2-86.0) with Ixchiq, under disease and infection blocking mechanism. Vaccinating adults 18-59 years with Ixchiq or Vimkunya yielded similar efficiency, with NNVs to avert a DALY of 339 (39-3412) and 361 (40-3777) respectively, under disease and infection-blocking mechanism.
Interpretation: Under current licensure, vaccinating adolescents aged 12-17 years first, followed by 18-59 years are efficient strategies, with similar NNVs for both Ixchiq and Vimkunya. If eligibility expands to younger populations, vaccinating 1-11-year age group will have relatively higher efficiency.
Funding: International Vaccine Institute and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.
{"title":"Age-specific chikungunya outbreak response immunisation strategies in Brazil: a modelling study.","authors":"Hyolim Kang, Ahyoung Lim, Andrew Clark, Felipe J Colón González, Hannah Eleanor Clapham, Jean-Paul Carrera, Jong-Hoon Kim, Megan Auzenbergs, Preethi Lakshminarayanan, Sandra López-Vergès, So Yoon Sim, Su Myat Han, Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Timothy Endy, Zulma M Cucunubá, W John Edmunds, Sushant Sahastrabuddhe, Oliver J Brady, Kaja Abbas","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103690","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two chikungunya vaccines, Ixchiq and Vimkunya are licensed. In April 2025, Brazil is the first endemic country to license Ixchiq, but optimal age groups for vaccination remain unclear. Our aim is to model the public health impact of age-specific chikungunya outbreak response immunisation strategies in Brazil and infer broader implications for vaccine use case scenarios in outbreak prone regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an age-structured transmission dynamic model calibrated with state-level Brazilian surveillance data for 2022 and long-term average annual force of infections. We simulated outbreak response immunisation strategies targeting ages 1-11, 12-17, 18-59, and ≥60 years for Ixchiq and Vimkunya across 11 out of 27 states in Brazil. We assessed vaccine impact by symptomatic cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted and number needed to vaccinate (NNV) based on vaccine protection against disease only and against both disease and infection.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Ixchiq and Vimkunya showed similar vaccine impact. Across strategies, vaccinating children 1-11 years yielded the lowest NNV for both vaccines, whereas vaccinating adults 18-59 years achieved the greatest absolute reduction in symptomatic cases, averting 62.5% (95% Uncertainty Intervals [UI]: 54.2-84.1) of total symptomatic cases with Vimkunya and 66.2% (58.2-86.0) with Ixchiq, under disease and infection blocking mechanism. Vaccinating adults 18-59 years with Ixchiq or Vimkunya yielded similar efficiency, with NNVs to avert a DALY of 339 (39-3412) and 361 (40-3777) respectively, under disease and infection-blocking mechanism.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Under current licensure, vaccinating adolescents aged 12-17 years first, followed by 18-59 years are efficient strategies, with similar NNVs for both Ixchiq and Vimkunya. If eligibility expands to younger populations, vaccinating 1-11-year age group will have relatively higher efficiency.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>International Vaccine Institute and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"103690"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12766480/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}