Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.497
Rebecca S Steinberg, Chelsea Amo-Tweneboah, Cory Sejo, Mark Belkin, Alexander G Hajduczok
{"title":"In case you missed it: Chicago Hemodynamic Forum 2025.","authors":"Rebecca S Steinberg, Chelsea Amo-Tweneboah, Cory Sejo, Mark Belkin, Alexander G Hajduczok","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.497","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145952285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.496
Quan M Bui, Ana Morales, Eric D Adler, Marcus A Urey, Anshul Sinha, Jessica Wang, Kimberly N Hong, Mattheus Ramsis
{"title":"Real-world Genetic Testing Practices in Cardiomyopathy: National Insights From 1.7 Million Patients.","authors":"Quan M Bui, Ana Morales, Eric D Adler, Marcus A Urey, Anshul Sinha, Jessica Wang, Kimberly N Hong, Mattheus Ramsis","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.496","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.496","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-05DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.498
Doug A Gouchoe, Shane S Scott, Divyaam Satija, Ervin Y Cui, Martin G Walsh, Matthew C Henn, Ajay Vallakati, Brent C Lampert, Sakima Smith, Nahush A Mokadam, Bryan A Whitson, Asvin M Ganapathi, Kukbin Choi
Purpose: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) as a donor for heart transplantation is a new practice. We sought to determine if center volume (high vs low) influenced perioperative outcomes and short-term survival.
Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify DCD heart recipients from 2019 to 2025. Recipients were stratified based on center volume: high-volume (>15 transplants over the observational period from 2019 to 2020) or low volume (≤15 transplants). Comparative statistics and Kaplan-Meier methods with the log-rank test were used to compare groups and determine survival. A Cox regression analysis using select donor and recipient criteria was created to determine the association of center volume and mortality.
Results: Low-volume group recipients had significantly longer waitlist times, temporary mechanical circulatory support use, and were more likely to be status 1 or 2 compared to the high-volume group. However, high-volume centers had significantly higher exceptions granted per center compared to low-volume centers. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes or short-term survival. Following adjustment, center volume was not independently associated with increased mortality, while increasing ischemic time was.
Conclusions: Transplant center volume had no significant effect on perioperative outcomes or survival after DCD heart transplantation. The discrepancy in presumed medical urgency and increased waitlist time in the low-volume cohort is highlighted by significantly more exceptions granted to high-volume recipients. This should be a noted area for improvement in the new allocation system to make heart transplantation more equitable for all recipients.
{"title":"Donation After Circulatory Death Donors for Heart Transplantation: Does Center Volume Matter?","authors":"Doug A Gouchoe, Shane S Scott, Divyaam Satija, Ervin Y Cui, Martin G Walsh, Matthew C Henn, Ajay Vallakati, Brent C Lampert, Sakima Smith, Nahush A Mokadam, Bryan A Whitson, Asvin M Ganapathi, Kukbin Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.498","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.498","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Donation after circulatory death (DCD) as a donor for heart transplantation is a new practice. We sought to determine if center volume (high vs low) influenced perioperative outcomes and short-term survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify DCD heart recipients from 2019 to 2025. Recipients were stratified based on center volume: high-volume (>15 transplants over the observational period from 2019 to 2020) or low volume (≤15 transplants). Comparative statistics and Kaplan-Meier methods with the log-rank test were used to compare groups and determine survival. A Cox regression analysis using select donor and recipient criteria was created to determine the association of center volume and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low-volume group recipients had significantly longer waitlist times, temporary mechanical circulatory support use, and were more likely to be status 1 or 2 compared to the high-volume group. However, high-volume centers had significantly higher exceptions granted per center compared to low-volume centers. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes or short-term survival. Following adjustment, center volume was not independently associated with increased mortality, while increasing ischemic time was.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transplant center volume had no significant effect on perioperative outcomes or survival after DCD heart transplantation. The discrepancy in presumed medical urgency and increased waitlist time in the low-volume cohort is highlighted by significantly more exceptions granted to high-volume recipients. This should be a noted area for improvement in the new allocation system to make heart transplantation more equitable for all recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145917605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-02DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.12.004
Sanne Ten Berg, Margriet Bogerd, Elma Peters, Koen Ameloot, Johannes Grand, Juan Russo, Jacob Jentzer, Pietro DI Santo, Rebecca Mathew, Benjamin Hibbert, Jesper Kjaergaard, Martin Meyer, Markus Skrifvars, Brian Roberts, Bruno Levy, Hamid Merdji, Arjan Malekzadeh, Wim Lagrand, Annemarie Engström, Alexander Vlaar, Luuk Otterspoor, José P S Henriques
Background: This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of different mean arterial pressure (MAP) levels on short-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with cardiac arrest (AMICS-CA) and without (AMICS without CA).
Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Studies that reported outcomes for patients with AMICS with and without CA in at least 2 groups of different MAP levels were eligible, including targeted MAPs in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and achieved average MAPs in observational studies. Authors of the included studies were proactively contacted for additional AMI data. Data were pooled using random-effects models. The primary endpoint was short-term mortality.
Results: Of 11,269 screened studies, 12 were included in the final analysis (4 RCTs and 8 observational studies), encompassing 1281 patients with AMICS-CA and 111 patients with AMICS without CA. Short-term mortality was similar between low- and high-MAP groups in AMICS-CA in both RCTs (34.9% vs 39.4%, Risk Ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.10) and observational data, as well as in patients with AMICS without CA, although based on just 2 observational studies.
Conclusions: Our meta-analysis showed no significant difference in short-term mortality between low- and high-MAP levels in patients with AMICS with CA. Similarly, although based on pooled observational data from only 2 studies, no significant difference in mortality was observed in patients with AMICS without CA. Overall, both limited evidence and heterogeneity in low- and high-MAP definitions across studies preclude firm conclusions.
背景:本综合系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在评估不同平均动脉压(MAP)水平对急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克合并心脏骤停(AMICS-CA)和非(AMICS-无CA)患者短期死亡率的影响。方法与结果:系统检索MEDLINE (OVID)、EMBASE (OVID)、CINAHL (Ebsco)和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库。在至少两个不同MAP水平的MAP组中报告了伴有或不伴有CA的AMICS患者的结果的研究是合格的,包括随机临床试验(rct)中的靶向MAP和观察性研究中的平均MAP。我们主动联系纳入研究的作者获取额外的AMI数据。使用随机效应模型汇总数据。主要终点是短期死亡率。在11,269项筛选的研究中,12项纳入最终分析(4项随机对照试验和8项观察性研究),包括1281例AMICS-CA患者和111例无CA的AMICS患者。两项随机对照试验中,AMICS-CA低map组和高map组的短期死亡率相似(34.9%对39.4%,RR 0.88, 95% ci 0.70-1.10)和观察性数据,以及无CA的AMICS患者,尽管仅基于两项观察性研究。结论:我们的荟萃分析显示,在伴有CA的AMICS患者中,低水平和高水平map的短期死亡率没有显著差异。同样,尽管仅基于两项研究的合并观察数据,但在没有CA的AMICS患者中,死亡率没有显著差异。总的来说,研究中低水平和高水平map定义的有限证据和异质性排除了确凿的结论。
{"title":"Mean Arterial Pressure and Mortality in Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock With and Without Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sanne Ten Berg, Margriet Bogerd, Elma Peters, Koen Ameloot, Johannes Grand, Juan Russo, Jacob Jentzer, Pietro DI Santo, Rebecca Mathew, Benjamin Hibbert, Jesper Kjaergaard, Martin Meyer, Markus Skrifvars, Brian Roberts, Bruno Levy, Hamid Merdji, Arjan Malekzadeh, Wim Lagrand, Annemarie Engström, Alexander Vlaar, Luuk Otterspoor, José P S Henriques","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.12.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of different mean arterial pressure (MAP) levels on short-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with cardiac arrest (AMICS-CA) and without (AMICS without CA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Studies that reported outcomes for patients with AMICS with and without CA in at least 2 groups of different MAP levels were eligible, including targeted MAPs in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and achieved average MAPs in observational studies. Authors of the included studies were proactively contacted for additional AMI data. Data were pooled using random-effects models. The primary endpoint was short-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 11,269 screened studies, 12 were included in the final analysis (4 RCTs and 8 observational studies), encompassing 1281 patients with AMICS-CA and 111 patients with AMICS without CA. Short-term mortality was similar between low- and high-MAP groups in AMICS-CA in both RCTs (34.9% vs 39.4%, Risk Ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.10) and observational data, as well as in patients with AMICS without CA, although based on just 2 observational studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis showed no significant difference in short-term mortality between low- and high-MAP levels in patients with AMICS with CA. Similarly, although based on pooled observational data from only 2 studies, no significant difference in mortality was observed in patients with AMICS without CA. Overall, both limited evidence and heterogeneity in low- and high-MAP definitions across studies preclude firm conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.033
Devika Adusumilli , Ibrahim Kamel , Machaiah Madhrira , Aditya Sharma , Amir Malik
Introduction
Wild-type transthyretin-cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) and aortic stenosis (AS) are age-related conditions with potential overlapping pathophysiology. This study evaluates the impact of coexisting AS and ATTR amyloidosis on mortality by comparing outcomes in patients with ATTR alone versus those with both AS and ATTR.
Hypothesis
Patients with coexisting ATTR and AS have higher mortality compared to those with ATTR alone.
Methods
This study utilized the TriNetX platform to perform a Compare Outcomes Analysis on two cohorts: AS + ATTR (Cohort 1, n=480 before matching, n=363 after matching) and ATTR (Cohort 2, n=4,516 before matching, n=363 after matching). Patients aged ≥65 years with wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) were included. Cohort 1 additionally had a diagnosis of nonrheumatic aortic stenosis (AS). The index event was defined as the first occurrence of these conditions.A 5-year (1825-day) follow-up period was used for outcome assessment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts.The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, assessed through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, and hazard ratios (HR). Additional measures included risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR), and risk difference (RD).
Results
After PSM, both cohorts had 363 patients. The median follow-up time was 386 days (IQR: 618) for AS + ATTR and 455 days (IQR: 805) for ATTR. Mortality was observed in 103 patients (28.5%) in AS + ATTR vs. 86 patients (23.8%) in ATTR. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significantly lower survival probability in AS + ATTR (40.07% vs. 56.32%, p=0.015).The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 1.424 (95% CI: 1.068-1.899, p=0.021), indicating an increased risk in AS + ATTR. Risk analysis showed an RR of 1.201 (95% CI: 0.939-1.537) and an OR of 1.281 (95% CI: 0.919-1.787), with a risk difference of 4.8% (p=0.144).
Conclusion
Patients with AS and ATTR amyloidosis exhibit a higher mortality risk compared to those with ATTR alone. The coexistence of these conditions may accelerate cardiac deterioration due to increased hemodynamic burden, impaired myocardial compliance, and exacerbation of heart failure symptoms. Studies have demonstrated that ATTR amyloidosis, particularly wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis, is frequently underdiagnosed in patients with AS, leading to delayed or suboptimal management. Early recognition using advanced imaging techniques, such as technetium-labeled scintigraphy and strain echocardiography, may improve diagnostic accuracy and inform individualized therapeutic strategies. Further research is necessary to better understand pathophysiology and identify optimal therapeutic strategies.
{"title":"A Retrospective Cohort Study Exploring Exploring The Impact Of Aortic Stenosis On Outcomes In Cardiac Amyloidosis","authors":"Devika Adusumilli , Ibrahim Kamel , Machaiah Madhrira , Aditya Sharma , Amir Malik","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.033","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.033","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Wild-type transthyretin-cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) and aortic stenosis (AS) are age-related conditions with potential overlapping pathophysiology. This study evaluates the impact of coexisting AS and ATTR amyloidosis on mortality by comparing outcomes in patients with ATTR alone versus those with both AS and ATTR.</div></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>Patients with coexisting ATTR and AS have higher mortality compared to those with ATTR alone.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study utilized the TriNetX platform to perform a Compare Outcomes Analysis on two cohorts: AS + ATTR (Cohort 1, n=480 before matching, n=363 after matching) and ATTR (Cohort 2, n=4,516 before matching, n=363 after matching). Patients aged ≥65 years with wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) were included. Cohort 1 additionally had a diagnosis of nonrheumatic aortic stenosis (AS). The index event was defined as the first occurrence of these conditions.A 5-year (1825-day) follow-up period was used for outcome assessment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts.The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, assessed through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank test, and hazard ratios (HR). Additional measures included risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR), and risk difference (RD).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After PSM, both cohorts had 363 patients. The median follow-up time was 386 days (IQR: 618) for AS + ATTR and 455 days (IQR: 805) for ATTR. Mortality was observed in 103 patients (28.5%) in AS + ATTR vs. 86 patients (23.8%) in ATTR. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significantly lower survival probability in AS + ATTR (40.07% vs. 56.32%, p=0.015).The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 1.424 (95% CI: 1.068-1.899, p=0.021), indicating an increased risk in AS + ATTR. Risk analysis showed an RR of 1.201 (95% CI: 0.939-1.537) and an OR of 1.281 (95% CI: 0.919-1.787), with a risk difference of 4.8% (p=0.144).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with AS and ATTR amyloidosis exhibit a higher mortality risk compared to those with ATTR alone. The coexistence of these conditions may accelerate cardiac deterioration due to increased hemodynamic burden, impaired myocardial compliance, and exacerbation of heart failure symptoms. Studies have demonstrated that ATTR amyloidosis, particularly wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis, is frequently underdiagnosed in patients with AS, leading to delayed or suboptimal management. Early recognition using advanced imaging techniques, such as technetium-labeled scintigraphy and strain echocardiography, may improve diagnostic accuracy and inform individualized therapeutic strategies. Further research is necessary to better understand pathophysiology and identify optimal therapeutic strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 184"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.037
Matthew Dean, Aditi Patel, Qihua Fan, Sarah Paciulli, Stephanie Cowardin, Jessica Davidson, Keyur Shah
Introduction
Risk stratification in transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR-CM) is guided by two staging systems, the Mayo Staging System, using N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), and the National Amyloidosis Centre ATTR Stage (NAC-ATTR) incorporating NT-proBNP and creatinine-based eGFR. These risk scores are derived from a Caucasian population prior to approved use of tafamidis. We validate these scoring systems in a diverse population, inclusive of those with hereditary ATTR-CM with V142I mutation.
Hypothesis
The Mayo staging system accurately predicts transplant-free survival compared to NAC-ATTR in a diverse population.
Methods
We analyzed data from a retrospective cohort of patients aged 18 and older with ATTR-CM followed at VCU Health from January 2009-December 2024 with complete staging biomarkers. Each patient was assigned a Mayo and NAC-ATTR stage. Troponin I (cTnI) substituted for hs-cTnT when unavailable (Table 1). Baseline characteristics were compared across stages. Unadjusted event-to-transplant-free survival Kaplan-Meier curves was plotted. Sub-analyses compared unadjusted mortality in V142I patients and among NAC-ATTR Stage 1 patients with and without detectable troponin.
Results
146 patients with ATTR-CM were identified. Median age was 77.9 (72.5-81.4), 64.3% were Black, 68.5% received tafamidis, 45.8% carried the V142I mutation. Most patients were classified as Stage 3 by Mayo (39.0%) and Stage 1 by NAC-ATTR (42.4%). Median BMI differed among Mayo and NAC-ATTR stages, and was lowest among Mayo Stage 3 (25.9, 23.1-29.7). Diastolic function decreased with higher stage. Among the total population and those with V142I mutation, transplant-free survival differed across both staging systems, with the lowest survival in Stage 3. Three-year (11.3% vs. 2.6%) and five-year mortality (12.9% vs. 5.1%) were higher in the NAC-ATTR Stage 1 group compared to Mayo Stage 1. Within NAC-ATTR Stage 1, patients with detectable troponin (48.3%) had lower transplant-free survival.
Conclusions
Among a diverse cohort of ATTR-CM patients in the tafamidis era, both the NAC-ATTR and Mayo Staging Systems stratified transplant-free survival. The NAC-ATTR was less reliable in identifying low-risk patients, suggesting current creatinine-based eGFR may underestimate mortality risk for a Black population subgroup.
{"title":"Revisiting Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis Staging Systems In A Diverse Cohort","authors":"Matthew Dean, Aditi Patel, Qihua Fan, Sarah Paciulli, Stephanie Cowardin, Jessica Davidson, Keyur Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.037","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.037","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Risk stratification in transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR-CM) is guided by two staging systems, the Mayo Staging System, using N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), and the National Amyloidosis Centre ATTR Stage (NAC-ATTR) incorporating NT-proBNP and creatinine-based eGFR. These risk scores are derived from a Caucasian population prior to approved use of tafamidis. We validate these scoring systems in a diverse population, inclusive of those with hereditary ATTR-CM with V142I mutation.</div></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>The Mayo staging system accurately predicts transplant-free survival compared to NAC-ATTR in a diverse population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from a retrospective cohort of patients aged 18 and older with ATTR-CM followed at VCU Health from January 2009-December 2024 with complete staging biomarkers. Each patient was assigned a Mayo and NAC-ATTR stage. Troponin I (cTnI) substituted for hs-cTnT when unavailable (Table 1). Baseline characteristics were compared across stages. Unadjusted event-to-transplant-free survival Kaplan-Meier curves was plotted. Sub-analyses compared unadjusted mortality in V142I patients and among NAC-ATTR Stage 1 patients with and without detectable troponin.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>146 patients with ATTR-CM were identified. Median age was 77.9 (72.5-81.4), 64.3% were Black, 68.5% received tafamidis, 45.8% carried the V142I mutation. Most patients were classified as Stage 3 by Mayo (39.0%) and Stage 1 by NAC-ATTR (42.4%). Median BMI differed among Mayo and NAC-ATTR stages, and was lowest among Mayo Stage 3 (25.9, 23.1-29.7). Diastolic function decreased with higher stage. Among the total population and those with V142I mutation, transplant-free survival differed across both staging systems, with the lowest survival in Stage 3. Three-year (11.3% vs. 2.6%) and five-year mortality (12.9% vs. 5.1%) were higher in the NAC-ATTR Stage 1 group compared to Mayo Stage 1. Within NAC-ATTR Stage 1, patients with detectable troponin (48.3%) had lower transplant-free survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among a diverse cohort of ATTR-CM patients in the tafamidis era, both the NAC-ATTR and Mayo Staging Systems stratified transplant-free survival. The NAC-ATTR was less reliable in identifying low-risk patients, suggesting current creatinine-based eGFR may underestimate mortality risk for a Black population subgroup.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 186"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.038
Ali Yilmaz , Ainara Lozano-Bahamonde , Nicolas Lamblin , Hiroaki Kitaoka , Emre Aldinc , David Danese , Shaun Bender , Mazen Hanna
Background
In HELIOS-B (NCT04153149), vutrisiran reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality (ACM) and CV events (CV hospitalizations and urgent HF visits) vs placebo in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) and also met all secondary endpoints. While the primary composite endpoint in HELIOS-B provides the central evidence for the efficacy of vutrisiran in reducing ACM and CV event risk, additional analyses that capture the distinctions between death and hospitalizations of differing lengths may provide additional insight into the efficacy of vutrisiran.
Hypothesis
The benefit of vutrisiran in patients with ATTR-CM can be further characterized by assessing its effect on days lost to death and/or hospitalization (DLDH) in HELIOS-B.
Methods
The number of DLDH, and days lost to death and/or CV hospitalization (DLDCVH), were calculated for each patient. Additionally, the remaining days (i.e., days not lost to death or hospitalization) were weighted based on functional and quality of life (QoL) assessments (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary Score [KCCQ-OS], or KCCQ-Total Symptom Score [KCCQ-TSS] and NYHA functional class); the result of this weighting was then used to calculate the number of days without full health due to impaired function or QoL. DLDH and DLDCVH (with and without the addition of days not in full health due to functional/QoL impairment) for vutrisiran vs placebo were analyzed using a beta or zero-inflated beta model.
Results
The analysis included 654 patients (326 vutrisiran, 328 placebo). Over 3 years, vutrisiran treatment resulted in a mean of 32.2 (95% CI 5.3, 59.3) fewer DLDH and a mean of 32.0 (95% CI 4.6, 59.5) fewer DLDCVH vs placebo (Table). Patients treated with vutrisiran had 64% greater odds of no DLDH and of no DLDCVH vs placebo. When additionally accounting for impaired function/QoL on days alive and not hospitalized, vutrisiran treatment led to a mean of 62.8 (95% CI 25.6, 99.8) and 64.4 (95% CI 27.4, 101.5) fewer days lost (weighted DLDH and DLDCVH, respectively) vs placebo when weighted by KCCQ-OS, and a mean of 49.5 (95% CI 22.5, 76.6) and 52.6 (95% CI 26.1, 79.0) fewer days lost (weighted DLDH and DLDCVH, respectively) vs placebo when weighted by KCCQ-TSS and NYHA class collectively (Table).
Conclusion
In patients with ATTR-CM, vutrisiran reduced the mean days lost to death and/or hospitalization by more than 1 month vs placebo over 3 years. The vutrisiran effect was greater when the impact of impaired function and QoL was accounted for. This abstract will be presented at ESC 2025, August 29−September 1, 2025, Madrid, Spain.
背景:在heliosb (NCT04153149)中,与安慰剂相比,vtrisiran降低了转甲状腺蛋白淀粉样变合并心肌病(atr - cm)患者的全因死亡率(ACM)和CV事件(CV住院和紧急HF就诊)的主要复合终点的风险,并且也满足了所有次要终点。虽然HELIOS-B的主要复合终点为vutrisiran降低ACM和CV事件风险的有效性提供了核心证据,但捕获不同时间死亡和住院之间差异的其他分析可能会为vutrisiran的有效性提供额外的见解。假设:通过评估乌曲西兰对HELIOS-B中死亡和/或住院天数(DLDH)的影响,可以进一步确定乌曲西兰对atr - cm患者的益处。方法计算每位患者的ldh数、死亡和/或CV住院天数(DLDCVH)。此外,根据功能和生活质量(QoL)评估(堪萨斯城心肌病问卷-总体总结评分[KCCQ-OS],或kccq -总症状评分[KCCQ-TSS]和NYHA功能分级)对剩余天数(即未因死亡或住院而损失的天数)进行加权;然后使用此加权的结果来计算由于功能受损或生活质量受损而没有完全健康的天数。使用β或零膨胀β模型分析了vutrisiran与安慰剂的DLDH和DLDCVH(有或没有由于功能/生活质量损害而不完全健康的天数)。结果共纳入654例患者(326例布曲西兰,328例安慰剂)。3年多来,与安慰剂相比,vutrisiran治疗导致DLDH平均减少32.2 (95% CI 5.3, 59.3), DLDCVH平均减少32.0 (95% CI 4.6, 59.5)(表)。与安慰剂相比,接受vutrisiran治疗的患者无DLDH和无DLDCVH的几率高出64%。当额外考虑存活天数和未住院天数的功能受损/生活质量时,当KCCQ-OS加权时,vutrisiran治疗比安慰剂平均减少62.8天(95% CI 25.6, 99.8)和64.4天(95% CI 27.4, 101.5)(加权DLDH和DLDCVH),当KCCQ-TSS和NYHA分类共同加权时,比安慰剂平均减少49.5天(95% CI 22.5, 76.6)和52.6天(95% CI 26.1, 79.0)(加权DLDH和DLDCVH)(表)。结论在atr - cm患者中,与安慰剂相比,vutrisiran在3年内将平均死亡和/或住院天数减少了1个月以上。当考虑到功能受损和生活质量的影响时,vutrisiran效应更大。该摘要将于2025年8月29日至9月1日在西班牙马德里举行的ESC 2025上发表。
{"title":"Vutrisiran Reduces Days Lost To Death And/or Hospitalization Versus Placebo In Patients With Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Cardiomyopathy In The HELIOS-B Trial","authors":"Ali Yilmaz , Ainara Lozano-Bahamonde , Nicolas Lamblin , Hiroaki Kitaoka , Emre Aldinc , David Danese , Shaun Bender , Mazen Hanna","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.038","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.038","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In HELIOS-B (NCT04153149), vutrisiran reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality (ACM) and CV events (CV hospitalizations and urgent HF visits) vs placebo in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) and also met all secondary endpoints. While the primary composite endpoint in HELIOS-B provides the central evidence for the efficacy of vutrisiran in reducing ACM and CV event risk, additional analyses that capture the distinctions between death and hospitalizations of differing lengths may provide additional insight into the efficacy of vutrisiran.</div></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>The benefit of vutrisiran in patients with ATTR-CM can be further characterized by assessing its effect on days lost to death and/or hospitalization (DLDH) in HELIOS-B.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The number of DLDH, and days lost to death and/or CV hospitalization (DLDCVH), were calculated for each patient. Additionally, the remaining days (i.e., days not lost to death or hospitalization) were weighted based on functional and quality of life (QoL) assessments (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary Score [KCCQ-OS], or KCCQ-Total Symptom Score [KCCQ-TSS] and NYHA functional class); the result of this weighting was then used to calculate the number of days without full health due to impaired function or QoL. DLDH and DLDCVH (with and without the addition of days not in full health due to functional/QoL impairment) for vutrisiran vs placebo were analyzed using a beta or zero-inflated beta model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis included 654 patients (326 vutrisiran, 328 placebo). Over 3 years, vutrisiran treatment resulted in a mean of 32.2 (95% CI 5.3, 59.3) fewer DLDH and a mean of 32.0 (95% CI 4.6, 59.5) fewer DLDCVH vs placebo (<strong>Table</strong>). Patients treated with vutrisiran had 64% greater odds of no DLDH and of no DLDCVH vs placebo. When additionally accounting for impaired function/QoL on days alive and not hospitalized, vutrisiran treatment led to a mean of 62.8 (95% CI 25.6, 99.8) and 64.4 (95% CI 27.4, 101.5) fewer days lost (weighted DLDH and DLDCVH, respectively) vs placebo when weighted by KCCQ-OS, and a mean of 49.5 (95% CI 22.5, 76.6) and 52.6 (95% CI 26.1, 79.0) fewer days lost (weighted DLDH and DLDCVH, respectively) vs placebo when weighted by KCCQ-TSS and NYHA class collectively (<strong>Table</strong>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients with ATTR-CM, vutrisiran reduced the mean days lost to death and/or hospitalization by more than 1 month vs placebo over 3 years. The vutrisiran effect was greater when the impact of impaired function and QoL was accounted for. This abstract will be presented at ESC 2025, August 29−September 1, 2025, Madrid, Spain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 186"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.044
Mariana Fontana , Ahmad Masri , Mathew S. Maurer , John McMurray , Scott D. Solomon , Minzhao Liu , Patrick Y. Jay , Ronald Witteles
Introduction
Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a progressive and fatal condition caused by deposition of misfolded transthyretin (TTR) as amyloid fibrils in multiple tissues. ATTR is classified as either hereditary (hATTR) or wild-type (wtATTR), depending on the presence or absence of amyloidogenic TTR gene variants, and manifests as either primarily cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), polyneuropathy, or a mixed phenotype. RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics suppress the hepatic production of TTR by targeting wild-type and variant TTR mRNA for degradation. Previous studies showed that rapid TTR knockdown with RNAi therapeutics improves outcomes for ATTR patients regardless of etiology or manifestation. Most recently, vutrisiran was shown to improve outcomes for patients with ATTR-CM across multiple domains in the HELIOS-B study, including reducing cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, and improving functional capacity and quality of life. Larger reductions in TTR levels correlated with greater clinical benefit in patients with hATTR and polyneuropathy, suggesting that greater TTR knockdown may offer similar benefits in ATTR-CM. Nucresiran (ALN-TTRsc04) is a next-generation RNAi therapeutic designed for the treatment of ATTR. In a Phase 1, ascending-single-dose study in healthy adults (NCT05661916), nucresiran led to rapid and sustained knockdown of TTR. Up to 95% knockdown by Day 15 and >90% mean reductions through Month 6 were achieved with subcutaneously administered doses ≥300 mg that were well tolerated.
Hypothesis
The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of nucresiran in patients with ATTR-CM will be evaluated in a global, Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study, the rationale and design of which will be described.
Methods
The study design, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be finalized in Q1 2025. Enrollment of adult patients with ATTR-CM is expected to begin in 2025. Key endpoints will assess mortality and cardiovascular events.
Results
The nucresiran Phase 3 ATTR-CM study design and rationale will be presented.
Conclusions
The Phase 3 study will investigate the efficacy, safety, and PK/PD of nucresiran in patients with ATTR-CM. Nucresiran has the potential to provide greater and more sustained TTR knockdown with lower inter-patient variability and less frequent dosing than current TTR-lowering therapies. This abstract will be presented at HFA 2025, May 17-20, 2025, Belgrade, Serbia.
{"title":"Design And Rationale Of A Phase 3 Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Nucresiran (aln-ttrsc04) In Patients With Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Cardiomyopathy","authors":"Mariana Fontana , Ahmad Masri , Mathew S. Maurer , John McMurray , Scott D. Solomon , Minzhao Liu , Patrick Y. Jay , Ronald Witteles","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.044","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.044","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a progressive and fatal condition caused by deposition of misfolded transthyretin (TTR) as amyloid fibrils in multiple tissues. ATTR is classified as either hereditary (hATTR) or wild-type (wtATTR), depending on the presence or absence of amyloidogenic <em>TTR</em> gene variants, and manifests as either primarily cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), polyneuropathy, or a mixed phenotype. RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics suppress the hepatic production of TTR by targeting wild-type and variant <em>TTR</em> mRNA for degradation. Previous studies showed that rapid TTR knockdown with RNAi therapeutics improves outcomes for ATTR patients regardless of etiology or manifestation. Most recently, vutrisiran was shown to improve outcomes for patients with ATTR-CM across multiple domains in the HELIOS-B study, including reducing cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, and improving functional capacity and quality of life. Larger reductions in TTR levels correlated with greater clinical benefit in patients with hATTR and polyneuropathy, suggesting that greater TTR knockdown may offer similar benefits in ATTR-CM. Nucresiran (ALN-TTRsc04) is a next-generation RNAi therapeutic designed for the treatment of ATTR. In a Phase 1, ascending-single-dose study in healthy adults (NCT05661916), nucresiran led to rapid and sustained knockdown of TTR. Up to 95% knockdown by Day 15 and >90% mean reductions through Month 6 were achieved with subcutaneously administered doses ≥300 mg that were well tolerated.</div></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of nucresiran in patients with ATTR-CM will be evaluated in a global, Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study, the rationale and design of which will be described.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study design, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be finalized in Q1 2025. Enrollment of adult patients with ATTR-CM is expected to begin in 2025. Key endpoints will assess mortality and cardiovascular events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The nucresiran Phase 3 ATTR-CM study design and rationale will be presented.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Phase 3 study will investigate the efficacy, safety, and PK/PD of nucresiran in patients with ATTR-CM. Nucresiran has the potential to provide greater and more sustained TTR knockdown with lower inter-patient variability and less frequent dosing than current TTR-lowering therapies. This abstract will be presented at HFA 2025, May 17-20, 2025, Belgrade, Serbia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 189"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.049
Paul Heidenreich , Neil Kalwani , Karim Sallam , Stephanie Hsiao , Rebecca Tisdale , Colette Dejong , Alexander Sandhu
Background
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is increasingly used to evaluate symptoms that may indicate heart failure (HF). Those with high BNP should have further evaluation per guidelines (e.g., echocardiography). However, the patient’s clinician may not be aware of or act on BNP results. We sought to determine how often a high BNP value was not followed by an echocardiogram or diagnosis of HF.
Methods
We identified all individuals in the US VA Health Care System with a high BNP (>200 mcg/dL) or NT-proBNP (>1000 mcg/dL) from 2020-2024. We excluded patients with a HF diagnosis (inpatient or outpatient) in the prior 5 years, those with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% in the prior 1 year, those that died in the next 90 days, and those with no medications provided by the VA in the next 90 days (to exclude those receiving care elsewhere). The primary outcome was either an echocardiogram or a HF diagnosis in the 90 days following a high BNP. We determined if there was any prescription for one of the four HF pillar medications per published guidelines (beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors).
Results
Among 84,682 patients with a high BNP and no known HF or low LVEF, 51,424 (61%) had either an echocardiogram (58%) or received a diagnosis of HF at 90 days (19%). The remaining 33,258 (39%) patients were considered to have inadequate follow-up (no-FU). The patients with no-FU were slightly older (76±10 years, vs. 75±10 years, p<0.0001). There was substantial variation in the frequency of no-FU across 126 VA health systems (Figure, p<0.0001) and regions of the United States with no-FU occurring in 41% of those in the West, 40% in the South, 38% in the Midwest and 36% in the Northeast (p<0.0001). The fraction of patients with no-FU decreased over time (43% in 2020 to 37% in 2024, p<0.0001). There were small but significant differences by race/ethnicity (greatest FU among Asian patients, lowest FU for American Indian patients). By 90 days following a high BNP, 41% of those with follow-up were prescribed at least one HF pillar medication compared to 25% of those with no-FU (p<0.0001).
Conclusion
Many patients with high BNP values and no prior diagnosis of heart failure are not evaluated with echocardiography or given an HF diagnosis in the subsequent 90 days. This lack of imaging is associated with less evidence-based treatment of HF. The high facility variation suggests there may be best practices that can be identified and adopted to improve diagnosis and treatment for these patients.
{"title":"Potential For Missed Heart Failure Diagnosis Among Those High B-type Natriuretic Peptide Values","authors":"Paul Heidenreich , Neil Kalwani , Karim Sallam , Stephanie Hsiao , Rebecca Tisdale , Colette Dejong , Alexander Sandhu","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.049","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.049","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is increasingly used to evaluate symptoms that may indicate heart failure (HF). Those with high BNP should have further evaluation per guidelines (e.g., echocardiography). However, the patient’s clinician may not be aware of or act on BNP results. We sought to determine how often a high BNP value was not followed by an echocardiogram or diagnosis of HF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified all individuals in the US VA Health Care System with a high BNP (>200 mcg/dL) or NT-proBNP (>1000 mcg/dL) from 2020-2024. We excluded patients with a HF diagnosis (inpatient or outpatient) in the prior 5 years, those with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <em>≤</em>40% in the prior 1 year, those that died in the next 90 days, and those with no medications provided by the VA in the next 90 days (to exclude those receiving care elsewhere). The primary outcome was either an echocardiogram or a HF diagnosis in the 90 days following a high BNP. We determined if there was any prescription for one of the four HF pillar medications per published guidelines (beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 84,682 patients with a high BNP and no known HF or low LVEF, 51,424 (61%) had either an echocardiogram (58%) or received a diagnosis of HF at 90 days (19%). The remaining 33,258 (39%) patients were considered to have inadequate follow-up (no-FU). The patients with no-FU were slightly older (76±10 years, vs. 75±10 years, p<0.0001). There was substantial variation in the frequency of no-FU across 126 VA health systems (Figure, p<0.0001) and regions of the United States with no-FU occurring in 41% of those in the West, 40% in the South, 38% in the Midwest and 36% in the Northeast (p<0.0001). The fraction of patients with no-FU decreased over time (43% in 2020 to 37% in 2024, p<0.0001). There were small but significant differences by race/ethnicity (greatest FU among Asian patients, lowest FU for American Indian patients). By 90 days following a high BNP, 41% of those with follow-up were prescribed at least one HF pillar medication compared to 25% of those with no-FU (p<0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Many patients with high BNP values and no prior diagnosis of heart failure are not evaluated with echocardiography or given an HF diagnosis in the subsequent 90 days. This lack of imaging is associated with less evidence-based treatment of HF. The high facility variation suggests there may be best practices that can be identified and adopted to improve diagnosis and treatment for these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 192"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.063
Craig Stolen, Molly Kupfer, Karen Tomes, Sean Horan, Ananta Pandey, Julie Snodie, Kate Frost, Shawn Merhaut
Background
To realize the benefits of remote heart failure monitoring technology, it must be integrated into clinical workflow in a way that supports timely reactions to alerts. Cardiology practices are varied and there is a need to optimize remote monitoring clinical workflow across a spectrum of organizational structures.
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of remote monitoring workflow redesign on the use of an implantable device-based multi-sensor diagnostic and on the associated heart failure alert metrics.
Methods
A rapid workflow redesign program was conducted at 27 cardiology sites. The program consisted of care team interviews, process mapping, multidisciplinary workshops, best practice suggestions, and leadership discussions to align on redesign goals and implementation plans. All sites agreed to the retrospective retrieval of HeartLogic-capable ICD and CRT device data from the LATITUDE remote patient management system. HeartLogic utilization and alert metrics were compared over 12-month periods before, during, and after re-design.
Results
The time from device implant to HeartLogic enablement decreased from an average of 28±110 days to 10±31 days at 24 months (p<0.0001), and remote data accessibility increased with delayed data transmissions decreasing from 10% to 6%. The number of HeartLogic alert onsets per year was unchanged; however, the length of individual alerts was shorter (47.6±38.4 days pre-redesign and 44.1±36.5 days post-redesign, p=0.001) and the total percent time each patient spent in alert was less (15.5±19.9% pre-redesign and 14.3±19.0% post redesign, p=0.04). The HeartLogic index values during each alert were also lower in the post-redesign period (maximum index value 28.9±12.8 vs 27.8±12.1, p=0.001).
Conclusion
Workflow redesign increased remote heart failure feature usage and improved alert metrics, suggesting more efficient uptake of remote monitoring and improvements in patients’ heart failure status. Focused attention on workflow with multi-disciplinary stakeholder involvement may improve clinic efficiencies that may translate into improved patient care.
为了实现远程心力衰竭监测技术的优势,必须以支持及时响应警报的方式将其集成到临床工作流程中。心脏病学实践是多种多样的,需要优化跨组织结构范围的远程监测临床工作流程。目的:本研究旨在评估远程监测工作流程重新设计对基于植入式设备的多传感器诊断和相关心力衰竭预警指标的影响。方法在27个心脏科进行快速工作流程重新设计。该项目包括护理团队访谈、流程绘制、多学科研讨会、最佳实践建议和领导讨论,以协调重新设计的目标和实施计划。所有试验点同意从LATITUDE远程患者管理系统中回顾性检索具有heartlogic功能的ICD和CRT设备数据。在重新设计之前、期间和之后的12个月期间比较了HeartLogic利用率和警报指标。结果从植入设备到启用HeartLogic的时间从24个月时的平均28±110天减少到10±31天(p<0.0001),远程数据可访问性增加,延迟数据传输从10%下降到6%。每年HeartLogic警报发作的次数没有变化;然而,个体警报的时间较短(重新设计前47.6±38.4天,重新设计后44.1±36.5天,p=0.001),每个患者处于警报的总时间百分比较少(重新设计前15.5±19.9%,重新设计后14.3±19.0%,p=0.04)。每一次警报期间的HeartLogic指数值在重新设计后也较低(最高值28.9±12.8 vs 27.8±12.1,p=0.001)。结论工作流程的重新设计增加了远程心力衰竭特征的使用,改善了警报指标,表明更有效地采用远程监测并改善了患者的心力衰竭状态。关注多学科利益相关者参与的工作流程可以提高临床效率,从而改善患者护理。
{"title":"Rapid Workflow Redesign Of Heart Failure Of Remote Monitoring Enhances Device-measured Physiological Metrics","authors":"Craig Stolen, Molly Kupfer, Karen Tomes, Sean Horan, Ananta Pandey, Julie Snodie, Kate Frost, Shawn Merhaut","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.063","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.063","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To realize the benefits of remote heart failure monitoring technology, it must be integrated into clinical workflow in a way that supports timely reactions to alerts. Cardiology practices are varied and there is a need to optimize remote monitoring clinical workflow across a spectrum of organizational structures.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of remote monitoring workflow redesign on the use of an implantable device-based multi-sensor diagnostic and on the associated heart failure alert metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A rapid workflow redesign program was conducted at 27 cardiology sites. The program consisted of care team interviews, process mapping, multidisciplinary workshops, best practice suggestions, and leadership discussions to align on redesign goals and implementation plans. All sites agreed to the retrospective retrieval of HeartLogic-capable ICD and CRT device data from the LATITUDE remote patient management system. HeartLogic utilization and alert metrics were compared over 12-month periods before, during, and after re-design.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The time from device implant to HeartLogic enablement decreased from an average of 28±110 days to 10±31 days at 24 months (p<0.0001), and remote data accessibility increased with delayed data transmissions decreasing from 10% to 6%. The number of HeartLogic alert onsets per year was unchanged; however, the length of individual alerts was shorter (47.6±38.4 days pre-redesign and 44.1±36.5 days post-redesign, p=0.001) and the total percent time each patient spent in alert was less (15.5±19.9% pre-redesign and 14.3±19.0% post redesign, p=0.04). The HeartLogic index values during each alert were also lower in the post-redesign period (maximum index value 28.9±12.8 vs 27.8±12.1, p=0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Workflow redesign increased remote heart failure feature usage and improved alert metrics, suggesting more efficient uptake of remote monitoring and improvements in patients’ heart failure status. Focused attention on workflow with multi-disciplinary stakeholder involvement may improve clinic efficiencies that may translate into improved patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 198"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}