首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Cardiac Failure最新文献

英文 中文
Safety And Efficacy Of Direct Oral Anticoagulants In Adults With Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices 使用持久左心室辅助装置的成人直接口服抗凝剂的安全性和有效性
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.018
Ashwin Pillai , Aryan Mehta , Balaphanidhar Mogga , Cesar Rubio-Ramos , Katrina Etts , Kelly McNamara-Diorio , Amanda Maxfield , Dawn Surprenant , Jason Gluck , Abhishek Jaiswal

Background

Therapeutic anticoagulation is essential for patients with durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). While warfarin remains the default anticoagulant of choice, its narrow therapeutic range, multiple pharmacologic interactions, the need for continuous dose adjustments, the limited time in therapeutic range (often <40%) resulting in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, all contribute to patient and provider dissatisfaction. There is limited data exploring alternate anticoagulation strategies in this cohort. We report the safety and efficacy of the direct acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) apixaban for anticoagulation in patients with the HeartMate (HM) 3 LVAD.

Hypothesis

DOACs offer a safe and effective anticoagulant in patients with durable HM3 LVADs

Methods

We compared thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events between patients with HeartMate 3 LVADs receiving warfarin to those who transitioned from warfarin to a DOAC due to adverse events or labile therapeutic responses on warfarin in our center.

Results

From 2018-2024, we included 47 patients, 16 on warfarin and 31 on apixaban. Cohorts were identical for baseline demographics and estimated risk of bleeding (Table 1). The absolute rate of all-cause bleeding per 100 patient-years was similar (warfarin (33) vs apixaban (29), p=0.24). The relative risk (RR) of major bleeding within the first 3 months of initiating anticoagulation was lower with DOAC - RR 0.08 (95% CI, 0.01 - 0.65, p=0.01) with an incidence of rate of 6.4% on apixaban vs 43.8% on warfarin. All-cause bleeding was less frequent with DOAC at 32% vs 68.8% - RR 0.14 (95% CI 0.03 - 0.62, p=0.009). Thrombotic events were identical. Table 2 summarizes clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

In patients with HM3 LVADs, DOAC might provide a safe and clinically useful alternative to default warfarin.
背景:治疗抗凝对于使用持久左心室辅助装置(lvad)的患者至关重要。虽然华法林仍然是默认的抗凝剂选择,但其狭窄的治疗范围,多种药理相互作用,需要持续调整剂量,治疗范围有限(通常为40%),导致血栓和出血性并发症,所有这些都导致患者和提供者的不满。在该队列中,探索其他抗凝策略的数据有限。我们报告了直接作用口服抗凝剂(DOAC)阿哌沙班用于HeartMate (HM) 3 LVAD患者抗凝的安全性和有效性。假设DOAC是一种安全有效的抗凝剂,可用于持久HM3级lvad患者。方法我们比较了心脏伴侣3级lvad患者接受华法林治疗与因华法林不良事件或治疗反应不稳定而从华法林过渡到DOAC的患者之间的血栓栓塞和出血事件。结果2018-2024年,我们纳入了47例患者,16例使用华法林,31例使用阿哌沙班。队列在基线人口统计学和估计出血风险方面是相同的(表1)。每100例患者年发生全因出血的绝对发生率相似(华法林33例与阿哌沙班29例,p=0.24)。开始抗凝治疗后3个月内发生大出血的相对危险度(RR)较低,DOAC - RR为0.08 (95% CI, 0.01 ~ 0.65, p=0.01),阿哌沙班组的发生率为6.4%,华法林组为43.8%。DOAC组全因出血发生率较低,分别为32%和68.8% - RR 0.14 (95% CI 0.03 - 0.62, p=0.009)。血栓事件相同。表2总结了临床结果。结论在HM3 lvad患者中,DOAC可能是一种安全且临床有用的替代华法林的方法。
{"title":"Safety And Efficacy Of Direct Oral Anticoagulants In Adults With Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices","authors":"Ashwin Pillai ,&nbsp;Aryan Mehta ,&nbsp;Balaphanidhar Mogga ,&nbsp;Cesar Rubio-Ramos ,&nbsp;Katrina Etts ,&nbsp;Kelly McNamara-Diorio ,&nbsp;Amanda Maxfield ,&nbsp;Dawn Surprenant ,&nbsp;Jason Gluck ,&nbsp;Abhishek Jaiswal","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.018","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Therapeutic anticoagulation is essential for patients with durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). While warfarin remains the default anticoagulant of choice, its narrow therapeutic range, multiple pharmacologic interactions, the need for continuous dose adjustments, the limited time in therapeutic range (often &lt;40%) resulting in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, all contribute to patient and provider dissatisfaction. There is limited data exploring alternate anticoagulation strategies in this cohort. We report the safety and efficacy of the direct acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) apixaban for anticoagulation in patients with the HeartMate (HM) 3 LVAD.</div></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>DOACs offer a safe and effective anticoagulant in patients with durable HM3 LVADs</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events between patients with HeartMate 3 LVADs receiving warfarin to those who transitioned from warfarin to a DOAC due to adverse events or labile therapeutic responses on warfarin in our center.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2018-2024, we included 47 patients, 16 on warfarin and 31 on apixaban. Cohorts were identical for baseline demographics and estimated risk of bleeding (Table 1). The absolute rate of all-cause bleeding per 100 patient-years was similar (warfarin (33) vs apixaban (29), p=0.24). The relative risk (RR) of major bleeding within the first 3 months of initiating anticoagulation was lower with DOAC - RR 0.08 (95% CI, 0.01 - 0.65, p=0.01) with an incidence of rate of 6.4% on apixaban vs 43.8% on warfarin. All-cause bleeding was less frequent with DOAC at 32% vs 68.8% - RR 0.14 (95% CI 0.03 - 0.62, p=0.009). Thrombotic events were identical. Table 2 summarizes clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients with HM3 LVADs, DOAC might provide a safe and clinically useful alternative to default warfarin.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 176-177"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring The Characteristics And Outcomes Of Heart Transplant Recipients Receiving Inpatient Palliative Care 探讨心脏移植受者接受住院姑息治疗的特点和结果
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.023
Shriya Khurana , Kelley Anderson , William Weintraub , Richa Gupta , Hunter Groninger

Introduction

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for stage D heart failure, conferring a median survival of over 12 years, but recipients often face complex clinical and emotional challenges. Palliative care can play a vital role in mitigating these challenges, including symptom management, psychosocial-spiritual counselling, and assisting with complex medical decision-making. Despite its importance, characteristics of heart transplant recipients who receive palliative care consultations and their outcomes remain inadequately studied. Objective: To characterize a population of heart transplant recipients receiving palliative care in-hospital and assess their outcomes.

Methods

At a transplant center in Washington DC, we conducted a retrospective chart review of adult heart transplant recipients who received a palliative care consultation for any indication between 2019 and 2024. We collected data on patient demographics, reason for palliative consult, hospital utilisation, and outcomes.

Results

A total of 230 palliative care consults took place for 129 patients over the study period. The cohort had a median age of 63 years and was predominantly male (65.2%). Most patients self-identified as African American (61.7%) or White (36.5%) and 90.4% as non-Hispanic. The reasons for palliative care consultation included symptom management (19.6%), patient/family counselling (12.2%), and goals of care (9.1%); most patients had multiple reasons for consultation (59.1%). Their average length of hospital stay was 26.1 days. ICU admissions occurred in 11.3% of patients, with an average ICU length of stay of 13.8 days. While 93.4% patients had full code status on admission, 15.6% had changed code status to do-not-resuscitate by hospital discharge. Of the entire cohort, only eight patients died in the hospital. Most patients (62.2%) had a life expectancy of greater than one year at hospital discharge.

Conclusion

Heart transplant recipients receiving inpatient palliative care form a unique cohort. Understanding characteristics of palliative consultation in this population may improve palliative care, resource availability, and supportive care outcomes for these patients in need.
心脏移植仍然是D期心力衰竭的金标准治疗方法,平均生存期超过12年,但接受者经常面临复杂的临床和情感挑战。姑息治疗可以在减轻这些挑战方面发挥至关重要的作用,包括症状管理、心理-社会-精神咨询和协助复杂的医疗决策。尽管它很重要,但接受姑息治疗咨询的心脏移植受者的特征及其结果仍然没有得到充分的研究。目的:对住院接受姑息治疗的心脏移植受者群体进行特征描述并评估其预后。方法在华盛顿特区的一家移植中心,我们对2019年至2024年期间因任何适应症接受姑息治疗咨询的成人心脏移植受者进行了回顾性图表回顾。我们收集了患者人口统计学、姑息治疗咨询的原因、医院使用率和结果的数据。结果在研究期间,129名患者共接受230次姑息治疗咨询。该队列的中位年龄为63岁,主要为男性(65.2%)。大多数患者自认为是非裔美国人(61.7%)或白人(36.5%),90.4%为非西班牙裔。姑息治疗咨询的原因包括症状管理(19.6%)、患者/家属咨询(12.2%)和护理目标(9.1%);多数患者就诊有多种原因(59.1%)。他们的平均住院时间为26.1天。11.3%的患者住院,平均住院时间为13.8天。93.4%的患者在入院时具有完整的代码状态,15.6%的患者在出院时将代码状态更改为不复苏状态。在整个队列中,只有8名患者在医院死亡。大多数患者(62.2%)出院时的预期寿命大于1年。结论接受姑息治疗的心脏移植受者是一个独特的群体。了解这一人群中姑息治疗的特点可以改善这些患者的姑息治疗、资源可用性和支持性护理结果。
{"title":"Exploring The Characteristics And Outcomes Of Heart Transplant Recipients Receiving Inpatient Palliative Care","authors":"Shriya Khurana ,&nbsp;Kelley Anderson ,&nbsp;William Weintraub ,&nbsp;Richa Gupta ,&nbsp;Hunter Groninger","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for stage D heart failure, conferring a median survival of over 12 years, but recipients often face complex clinical and emotional challenges. Palliative care can play a vital role in mitigating these challenges, including symptom management, psychosocial-spiritual counselling, and assisting with complex medical decision-making. Despite its importance, characteristics of heart transplant recipients who receive palliative care consultations and their outcomes remain inadequately studied. Objective: To characterize a population of heart transplant recipients receiving palliative care in-hospital and assess their outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>At a transplant center in Washington DC, we conducted a retrospective chart review of adult heart transplant recipients who received a palliative care consultation for any indication between 2019 and 2024. We collected data on patient demographics, reason for palliative consult, hospital utilisation, and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 230 palliative care consults took place for 129 patients over the study period. The cohort had a median age of 63 years and was predominantly male (65.2%). Most patients self-identified as African American (61.7%) or White (36.5%) and 90.4% as non-Hispanic. The reasons for palliative care consultation included symptom management (19.6%), patient/family counselling (12.2%), and goals of care (9.1%); most patients had multiple reasons for consultation (59.1%). Their average length of hospital stay was 26.1 days. ICU admissions occurred in 11.3% of patients, with an average ICU length of stay of 13.8 days. While 93.4% patients had full code status on admission, 15.6% had changed code status to do-not-resuscitate by hospital discharge. Of the entire cohort, only eight patients died in the hospital. Most patients (62.2%) had a life expectancy of greater than one year at hospital discharge.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Heart transplant recipients receiving inpatient palliative care form a unique cohort. Understanding characteristics of palliative consultation in this population may improve palliative care, resource availability, and supportive care outcomes for these patients in need.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 179"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Care Burden For Heart Transplantation And Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device In The United States: A Propensity-matched Analysis In The Contemporary Era. 美国心脏移植和耐用左心室辅助装置的护理负担:当代倾向匹配分析。
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.026
Balaphanidhar Mogga , Karanrajsinh Raol , Ashwin Pillai , Prathyusha Mudduluru , Zeina Jedeon , Dheeraj Pinninty , Katrina Etts , William Baker , Abhishek Jaiswal

Introduction

Heart transplantation (HT) remains the gold standard for end-stage heart failure, while durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), particularly the HeartMate 3 (HM3), have improved survival and reduced complications. Using a nationwide database, this study compares index hospitalization costs, length of stay (LOS), and readmission costs between HT and LVAD recipients.

Methods

We analyzed adult patients undergoing HT or LVAD implantation from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2018-2021) using ICD-10-CM procedure codes. Before matching, 7,129 HT and 7,240 LVAD recipients were identified (a total of 14,369 patients and 27,308 weighted hospitalizations). After propensity score matching (1:1), 5,330 HT and 5,330 LVAD recipients were included. The primary outcomes were index hospitalization costs, LOS, and 30-day and 90-day readmission costs.

Results

Among 10,660 propensity-matched patients, LVAD therapy incurred higher median index hospitalization costs ($246,087) compared to HT ($228,869, p < 0.001). Post-procedural LOS was significantly longer for LVAD recipients (21 vs. 17 days, p < 0.001), contributing to increased hospitalization costs. LOS was also longer in LVAD recipients (34 vs. 32 days, p < 0.001) (Table 1). Regarding readmission costs, HT recipients had higher median 30-day ($16,606 vs. $11,736, p < 0.001) and 90-day ($15,233 vs. $11,680, p < 0.001) readmission costs compared to LVAD. This difference was partly attributable to more procedures during readmissions among HT recipients (2 vs. 1, p < 0.001). However, despite higher readmission costs, LVAD recipients had a significantly greater overall 90-day readmission rate (45.6% vs. 40.7%, p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Conclusion

In a propensity-matched cohort of 10,660 patients, LVAD therapy was associated with higher index hospitalization costs, longer LOS, and greater overall resource utilization. While HT incurred higher readmission costs per episode, LVAD patients had a higher overall readmission burden. These findings provide key insights into cost considerations in advanced heart failure management and highlight the need for strategies to optimize cost-effectiveness while improving patient outcomes.
心脏移植(HT)仍然是终末期心力衰竭的金标准,而耐用的左心室辅助装置(LVAD),特别是HeartMate 3 (HM3),提高了生存率并减少了并发症。使用一个全国性的数据库,本研究比较了HT和LVAD受者的住院费用、住院时间(LOS)和再入院费用。方法我们使用ICD-10-CM程序代码分析来自全国再入院数据库(2018-2021)的接受HT或LVAD植入的成年患者。在匹配之前,确定了7129名HT和7240名LVAD受者(总共14369名患者和27308名加权住院患者)。倾向评分匹配(1:1)后,纳入5330名HT和5330名LVAD受者。主要结局是指数住院费用、LOS、30天和90天再入院费用。结果在10,660名倾向匹配的患者中,LVAD治疗的中位指数住院费用(246,087美元)高于HT(228,869美元,p < 0.001)。LVAD受者术后LOS明显延长(21天vs. 17天,p < 0.001),导致住院费用增加。LVAD受者的LOS也更长(34天vs. 32天,p < 0.001)(表1)。关于再入院费用,与LVAD相比,HT患者的30天(16,606美元对11,736美元,p < 0.001)和90天(15,233美元对11,680美元,p < 0.001)再入院费用中位数更高。这种差异的部分原因是HT患者在再入院时进行了更多的手术(2 vs. 1, p < 0.001)。然而,尽管再入院费用较高,LVAD受者的总体90天再入院率明显更高(45.6%对40.7%,p < 0.001)(表2)。在10660例患者的倾向匹配队列中,LVAD治疗与更高的住院费用、更长的LOS和更高的总体资源利用率相关。虽然HT每次发作的再入院费用较高,但LVAD患者的总体再入院负担较高。这些发现为晚期心力衰竭管理的成本考虑提供了关键见解,并强调了在改善患者预后的同时优化成本效益的策略的必要性。
{"title":"Care Burden For Heart Transplantation And Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device In The United States: A Propensity-matched Analysis In The Contemporary Era.","authors":"Balaphanidhar Mogga ,&nbsp;Karanrajsinh Raol ,&nbsp;Ashwin Pillai ,&nbsp;Prathyusha Mudduluru ,&nbsp;Zeina Jedeon ,&nbsp;Dheeraj Pinninty ,&nbsp;Katrina Etts ,&nbsp;William Baker ,&nbsp;Abhishek Jaiswal","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.026","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.026","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Heart transplantation (HT) remains the gold standard for end-stage heart failure, while durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), particularly the HeartMate 3 (HM3), have improved survival and reduced complications. Using a nationwide database, this study compares index hospitalization costs, length of stay (LOS), and readmission costs between HT and LVAD recipients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed adult patients undergoing HT or LVAD implantation from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2018-2021) using ICD-10-CM procedure codes. Before matching, 7,129 HT and 7,240 LVAD recipients were identified (a total of 14,369 patients and 27,308 weighted hospitalizations). After propensity score matching (1:1), 5,330 HT and 5,330 LVAD recipients were included. The primary outcomes were index hospitalization costs, LOS, and 30-day and 90-day readmission costs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 10,660 propensity-matched patients, LVAD therapy incurred higher median index hospitalization costs ($246,087) compared to HT ($228,869, p &lt; 0.001). Post-procedural LOS was significantly longer for LVAD recipients (21 vs. 17 days, p &lt; 0.001), contributing to increased hospitalization costs. LOS was also longer in LVAD recipients (34 vs. 32 days, p &lt; 0.001) (Table 1). Regarding readmission costs, HT recipients had higher median 30-day ($16,606 vs. $11,736, p &lt; 0.001) and 90-day ($15,233 vs. $11,680, p &lt; 0.001) readmission costs compared to LVAD. This difference was partly attributable to more procedures during readmissions among HT recipients (2 vs. 1, p &lt; 0.001). However, despite higher readmission costs, LVAD recipients had a significantly greater overall 90-day readmission rate (45.6% vs. 40.7%, p &lt; 0.001) (Table 2).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In a propensity-matched cohort of 10,660 patients, LVAD therapy was associated with higher index hospitalization costs, longer LOS, and greater overall resource utilization. While HT incurred higher readmission costs per episode, LVAD patients had a higher overall readmission burden. These findings provide key insights into cost considerations in advanced heart failure management and highlight the need for strategies to optimize cost-effectiveness while improving patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 180-181"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinician Persuasion in Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient-Physician Discussions About the Benefits and Tradeoffs of Heart Failure Medications 临床医生在共同决策说服:一个定性分析的病人-医生讨论的利益和权衡心力衰竭药物
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.056
Henry Biermann , Candace D. Speight , Sarah C. Montembeau , Andrea R. Mitchell , Emily F. Lowe , Advaita Krishnan , Laura D. Scherer , Daniel D. Matlock , Peter A. Ubel , Larry A. Allen , Neal Dickert

Introduction

How physicians frame medication benefits and tradeoffs while engaging in shared decision making with patients is not well described in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods

This qualitative, secondary analysis of recorded encounters between clinicians and patients with HFrEF sought to identify major themes regarding communication of medication benefits and tradeoffs. Encounters occurred in six clinics within two academic health systems. English-speaking adult patients with a diagnosis of HFrEF (ejection fraction <40%) were enrolled. Major themes regarding communication of benefits and tradeoffs were identified through analysis of transcripts.

Results

A total of 247 patient encounters were analyzed. Patients’ mean (SD) age was 62.9 (13.9); 70.5% were male; 64.0% were White, 26.3% Black, and 3.2% Hispanic/Latinx. Overall, 70% of encounters contained a discussion involving medication benefits. Substantial variability was observed, and four main themes emerged. 1) Primary benefits (increased survival, reduced hospitalizations, better quality of life) were commonly discussed in clinic visits, but clinicians described the magnitude of such benefits in only two cases; 2) Adjunctive drug benefits (improved physiology, tolerability, affordability) were described nonspecifically; 3) Persuasive forms of communication were common, including direct appeals to authority/guidelines, references to pharmaceutical advertisements, and emotive language; 4) Significant heterogeneity was present in the content and character of benefit tradeoff discussions.

Conclusions

Rare inclusion of medication benefit magnitude, variability in the presentation of benefits, and use of persuasive and emotive communication all challenge traditional notions of shared decision-making but are commonly encountered in clinical interactions for heart failure. Further work is needed to identify which of these characteristics are modifiable and which may promote or interfere with patient-centered care.
在治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的过程中,医生在与患者共同决策时如何制定药物的益处和权衡并没有得到很好的描述。方法对临床医生和HFrEF患者之间记录的接触进行定性、二次分析,旨在确定有关药物益处和权衡的沟通的主要主题。接触发生在两个学术卫生系统内的六个诊所。研究纳入了诊断为HFrEF(射血分数40%)的英语成人患者。通过对抄本的分析,确定了关于利益和权衡的交流的主要主题。结果共分析247例患者就诊情况。患者平均(SD)年龄为62.9岁(13.9岁);70.5%为男性;64.0%为白人,26.3%为黑人,3.2%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。总体而言,70%的会面包含了有关药物益处的讨论。观察到大量的变化,并出现了四个主要主题。1)主要益处(增加生存率,减少住院时间,提高生活质量)通常在临床访问中被讨论,但临床医生只在两个病例中描述了这些益处的大小;2)辅助药物的益处(改善生理、耐受性、可负担性)被非特异性描述;3)说服性的沟通形式很常见,包括直接诉诸权威/指导方针、参考药品广告和情感语言;4)利益权衡讨论的内容和特征存在显著的异质性。结论:罕见的药物获益程度纳入、获益呈现的可变性、说服性和情感沟通的使用都挑战了共同决策的传统观念,但在心力衰竭的临床相互作用中却经常遇到。需要进一步的工作来确定这些特征中哪些是可以改变的,哪些可能促进或干扰以患者为中心的护理。
{"title":"Clinician Persuasion in Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient-Physician Discussions About the Benefits and Tradeoffs of Heart Failure Medications","authors":"Henry Biermann ,&nbsp;Candace D. Speight ,&nbsp;Sarah C. Montembeau ,&nbsp;Andrea R. Mitchell ,&nbsp;Emily F. Lowe ,&nbsp;Advaita Krishnan ,&nbsp;Laura D. Scherer ,&nbsp;Daniel D. Matlock ,&nbsp;Peter A. Ubel ,&nbsp;Larry A. Allen ,&nbsp;Neal Dickert","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.056","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.11.056","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>How physicians frame medication benefits and tradeoffs while engaging in shared decision making with patients is not well described in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This qualitative, secondary analysis of recorded encounters between clinicians and patients with HFrEF sought to identify major themes regarding communication of medication benefits and tradeoffs. Encounters occurred in six clinics within two academic health systems. English-speaking adult patients with a diagnosis of HFrEF (ejection fraction &lt;40%) were enrolled. Major themes regarding communication of benefits and tradeoffs were identified through analysis of transcripts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 247 patient encounters were analyzed. Patients’ mean (SD) age was 62.9 (13.9); 70.5% were male; 64.0% were White, 26.3% Black, and 3.2% Hispanic/Latinx. Overall, 70% of encounters contained a discussion involving medication benefits. Substantial variability was observed, and four main themes emerged. 1) Primary benefits (increased survival, reduced hospitalizations, better quality of life) were commonly discussed in clinic visits, but clinicians described the magnitude of such benefits in only two cases; 2) Adjunctive drug benefits (improved physiology, tolerability, affordability) were described nonspecifically; 3) Persuasive forms of communication were common, including direct appeals to authority/guidelines, references to pharmaceutical advertisements, and emotive language; 4) Significant heterogeneity was present in the content and character of benefit tradeoff discussions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Rare inclusion of medication benefit magnitude, variability in the presentation of benefits, and use of persuasive and emotive communication all challenge traditional notions of shared decision-making but are commonly encountered in clinical interactions for heart failure. Further work is needed to identify which of these characteristics are modifiable and which may promote or interfere with patient-centered care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 195"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145950343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute Heart Failure: Transitioning From Symptom-Based Care to Remission 急性心力衰竭-从基于症状的护理过渡到缓解。
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.12.016
GAD COTTER MD , BETH A. DAVISON PhD , DOUGLAS L. MANN MD , JAN BIEGUS MD, PhD , JOZINE M. TERMAATEN MD, PhD , MATTEO PAGNESI MD, PhD , YONATHAN FREUND MD, PhD , ADRIAAN A. VOORS MD, PhD , PIOTR PONIKOWSKI MD, PhD , MARCO METRA MD , ALEXANDRE MEBAZAA MD, PhD
During the past century, the characteristics of patients with heart failure (HF) and acute HF (AHF) have shifted from patients with severe pump failure due to rheumatic, hypertensive and ischemic heart disease to older and more obese patients with multiple severe comorbidities. The pathophysiology of AHF has shifted, in parallel, from that of advanced, end-stage pump failure caused by severe left ventricular dysfunction to age, obesity and comorbidity-related cardiovascular dysfunction combined with neurohormonal and inflammatory dysregulation or “inflammaging.” With the advent of neurohormonal blockers leading to improved outcomes of patients with chronic HF, the focus of AHF therapy has also changed from care directed at early symptom improvement to therapies directed toward longer-term improvements in quality of life and outcomes. Studies conducted in the past 5 years suggest that the beneficial effects seen with the 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy for HF, mostly comprising neurohormonal blockade, can be extended to AHF when these therapies are initiated and rapidly uptitrated during admission and after discharge. A recent pilot study, CORTAHF (Effect of Short-Term Prednisone Therapy on CRP Change in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Elevated Inflammatory Markers), has suggested that these benefits can be extended by treating patients with AHF and markers of inflammatory activation with anti-inflammatory therapies. Future studies should further examine whether combined anti-inflammatory therapy and neurohormonal blockade can lead to the reversal of disrupted underlying pathophysiology and remission in patients with AHF.
在上个世纪,心力衰竭(HF)和急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的特征已从风湿性、高血压和缺血性心脏病导致的严重泵衰竭患者转变为年龄更大、更肥胖且患有多种严重并发症的患者。与此同时,急性心力衰竭的病理生理学也从严重左心室功能障碍导致的晚期、终末期泵衰竭转变为年龄、肥胖和合并症相关的心血管功能障碍以及神经激素和炎症失调或 "炎症衰老"。随着神经激素阻滞剂的出现,慢性心房颤动患者的预后得到改善,心房颤动治疗的重点也从针对早期症状改善的治疗转变为针对长期生活质量和预后改善的治疗。过去 5 年进行的研究表明,如果在入院期间和出院后开始使用并迅速增加这些疗法,那么高血压医疗指南指导的四大支柱疗法(主要包括神经激素阻滞剂)所产生的有益效果可扩展至心房颤动。最近的一项试验性研究(CORTAHF)表明,用抗炎疗法治疗心房颤动和炎症激活标记物患者,可以扩大这些疗效。未来的研究应进一步探讨联合抗炎疗法和神经激素阻断是否能逆转 AHF 患者紊乱的潜在病理生理学并使病情得到缓解。
{"title":"Acute Heart Failure: Transitioning From Symptom-Based Care to Remission","authors":"GAD COTTER MD ,&nbsp;BETH A. DAVISON PhD ,&nbsp;DOUGLAS L. MANN MD ,&nbsp;JAN BIEGUS MD, PhD ,&nbsp;JOZINE M. TERMAATEN MD, PhD ,&nbsp;MATTEO PAGNESI MD, PhD ,&nbsp;YONATHAN FREUND MD, PhD ,&nbsp;ADRIAAN A. VOORS MD, PhD ,&nbsp;PIOTR PONIKOWSKI MD, PhD ,&nbsp;MARCO METRA MD ,&nbsp;ALEXANDRE MEBAZAA MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the past century, the characteristics of patients with heart failure (HF) and acute HF (AHF) have shifted from patients with severe pump failure due to rheumatic, hypertensive and ischemic heart disease to older and more obese patients with multiple severe comorbidities. The pathophysiology of AHF has shifted, in parallel, from that of advanced, end-stage pump failure caused by severe left ventricular dysfunction to age, obesity and comorbidity-related cardiovascular dysfunction combined with neurohormonal and inflammatory dysregulation or “inflammaging.” With the advent of neurohormonal blockers leading to improved outcomes of patients with chronic HF, the focus of AHF therapy has also changed from care directed at early symptom improvement to therapies directed toward longer-term improvements in quality of life and outcomes. Studies conducted in the past 5 years suggest that the beneficial effects seen with the 4 pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy for HF, mostly comprising neurohormonal blockade, can be extended to AHF when these therapies are initiated and rapidly uptitrated during admission and after discharge. A recent pilot study, CORTAHF (Effect of Short-Term Prednisone Therapy on CRP Change in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Elevated Inflammatory Markers), has suggested that these benefits can be extended by treating patients with AHF and markers of inflammatory activation with anti-inflammatory therapies. Future studies should further examine whether combined anti-inflammatory therapy and neurohormonal blockade can lead to the reversal of disrupted underlying pathophysiology and remission in patients with AHF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 106-114"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143425494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in Seated Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Response to Titration of Heart Failure Medications During Ambulatory Monitoring 动态监测期间心衰药物滴定对坐姿肺动脉压的影响。
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.02.001
SANDIP K. ZALAWADIYA MBBS , MICHAEL KIERNAN MD, MCS , BARRY A. BORLAUG MD , LYNNE WARNER STEVENSON MD , AKSHAY S. DESAI MD , MOSI BENNETT MD , WILFRIED MULLENS MD , NICHOLAS J. HIIVALA BME , MAX M. OWENS , LIVIU KLEIN MD, MS

Introduction

Ambulatory hemodynamic monitoring (AHM) of heart failure (HF) using pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) is marked by frequent changes in HF medications. We are beginning to learn how medication titrations during AHM affect mean PAP (mPAP) measured in the seated position, which reflects most waking hours.

Method

We analyzed the 12-month data from the PROACTIVE-HF trial of the Cordella Cordella, Endotronix Inc, Naperville, Illinois, United States) PAP sensor system. Seated mPAP was examined in the 14-days before and after isolated changes in medications; only those medications with ≥10 titrations were analyzed. Dependent sample Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used to compare changes in mPAP with titrations.

Results

We analyzed 456 subjects (age: 64 years, females: 40%, Black: 18%, HF with reduced ejection fraction: 46%). Loop diuretics (LD) were up-titrated 176 times in 133 patients and down-titrated 113 times in 96 patients. Before LD up-titration, mPAP increased by 1.6 ± 1.0 mm Hg; afterwards, it decreased by 2.3 ± 1.0 mm Hg (P < 0.001), with most reduction occurring within 1 week. Down-titration of LD was followed by an increase of 1.8 ± 1.3 mm Hg (P = 0.004) over the next several days. Similar trends were observed across categories of ejection fraction (≤40% and >40%). Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) up-titration decreased mPAP by 1.8 ± 1.9 mm Hg (P = 0.042), whereas down-titration increased mPAP by 1.5 ± 1.4 (P = 0.094). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) up-titration tended to decrease mPAP (1.6 ± 2.5 mm Hg, P = 0.286,) whereas down-titration was followed by a significant increase in mPAP of 3.2 ± 1.6 mm Hg (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

The AHM platform using seated mPAP data provided valuable insights into its short-term responses to isolated changes in HF medications. The seated mPAP changed expectedly in response to the titration of LD, whereas the degree of response varied for ARNI and MRA. Ongoing investigation will further characterize the timing and variability of responses to inform algorithms for ambulatory management of PAP.
使用肺动脉压(PAP)监测心衰(HF)的动态血流动力学监测(AHM)的特点是心衰药物的频繁变化。我们开始了解AHM期间药物滴定如何影响坐位测量的平均PAP (mPAP),这反映了大多数清醒时间。方法:对CordellaTM PAP传感器系统PROACTIVE-HF试验12个月的数据进行分析。在单独改变药物前后14天检测坐式mPAP;仅分析≥10次滴定的药物。使用依赖样本wilcoxon符号秩检验来比较mPAP与滴定的变化。结果:我们分析了456例受试者(年龄:64岁,女性:40%,黑人:18%,心力衰竭伴射血分数降低:46%)。133例患者中有176次将袢利尿剂(LD)上滴,96例患者中有113次将其下滴。升滴前mPAP升高1.6±1.0mmHg,升滴后降低2.3±1.0 mmHg (p40%)。血管紧张素受体溶血素抑制剂(ARNI)上滴可使mPAP降低1.8±1.9 mmHg (p=0.042),而下滴可使mPAP升高1.5±1.4 mmHg (p=0.094)。矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)上滴可降低mPAP(1.6±2.5 mmHg, p=0.286),而下滴后mPAP显著增加3.2±1.6 mmHg (p=0.001)。结论:利用坐式mPAP数据的AHM平台为其对心衰药物单独变化的短期反应提供了有价值的见解。原位mPAP随着LD的滴定而改变,而ARNI和MRA的反应程度则有所不同。正在进行的调查将进一步表征反应的时间和可变性,为PAP的门诊管理算法提供信息。
{"title":"Changes in Seated Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Response to Titration of Heart Failure Medications During Ambulatory Monitoring","authors":"SANDIP K. ZALAWADIYA MBBS ,&nbsp;MICHAEL KIERNAN MD, MCS ,&nbsp;BARRY A. BORLAUG MD ,&nbsp;LYNNE WARNER STEVENSON MD ,&nbsp;AKSHAY S. DESAI MD ,&nbsp;MOSI BENNETT MD ,&nbsp;WILFRIED MULLENS MD ,&nbsp;NICHOLAS J. HIIVALA BME ,&nbsp;MAX M. OWENS ,&nbsp;LIVIU KLEIN MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.02.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ambulatory hemodynamic monitoring (AHM) of heart failure (HF) using pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) is marked by frequent changes in HF medications. We are beginning to learn how medication titrations during AHM affect mean PAP (mPAP) measured in the seated position, which reflects most waking hours.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We analyzed the 12-month data from the PROACTIVE-HF trial of the Cordella Cordella, Endotronix Inc, Naperville, Illinois, United States) PAP sensor system. Seated mPAP was examined in the 14-days before and after isolated changes in medications; only those medications with ≥10 titrations were analyzed. Dependent sample Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used to compare changes in mPAP with titrations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 456 subjects (age: 64 years, females: 40%, Black: 18%, HF with reduced ejection fraction: 46%). Loop diuretics (LD) were up-titrated 176 times in 133 patients and down-titrated 113 times in 96 patients. Before LD up-titration, mPAP increased by 1.6 ± 1.0 mm Hg; afterwards, it decreased by 2.3 ± 1.0 mm Hg (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), with most reduction occurring within 1 week. Down-titration of LD was followed by an increase of 1.8 ± 1.3 mm Hg (<em>P</em> = 0.004) over the next several days. Similar trends were observed across categories of ejection fraction (≤40% and &gt;40%). Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) up-titration decreased mPAP by 1.8 ± 1.9 mm Hg (<em>P</em> = 0.042), whereas down-titration increased mPAP by 1.5 ± 1.4 (<em>P</em> = 0.094). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) up-titration tended to decrease mPAP (1.6 ± 2.5 mm Hg, <em>P</em> = 0.286,) whereas down-titration was followed by a significant increase in mPAP of 3.2 ± 1.6 mm Hg (<em>P</em> = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AHM platform using seated mPAP data provided valuable insights into its short-term responses to isolated changes in HF medications. The seated mPAP changed expectedly in response to the titration of LD, whereas the degree of response varied for ARNI and MRA. Ongoing investigation will further characterize the timing and variability of responses to inform algorithms for ambulatory management of PAP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 32-42"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143414410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 140-144"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146478429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 160-162"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146478433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 171"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146478439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Page 173"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146478442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1