<p>Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers remain the cornerstone of contemporary aesthetic dermatology, offering reversibility, predictable outcomes, and the capacity to rejuvenate while maintaining core facial identity when anatomically guided [<span>1, 2</span>]. Alongside the evolution in technique and safety, a parallel sociocultural transformation driven by digital aesthetics has reshaped public perception of fillers. Within this landscape, two interconnected phenomena have emerged as central to modern clinical practice: Overfilled Face Syndrome (OFS) and its psychological counterpart, the Fear of Overfilling (FOF). This commentary proposes FOF as a conceptual framework and heuristic tool rather than a formally validated diagnostic entity, serving to understand a clinically significant response to the hypervisibility of distorted aesthetic outcomes in digital environments. Recognizing FOF as a structured psychocultural phenomenon is essential for improving communication, enhancing adherence, and guiding modern treatment planning.</p><p>FOF is conceptualized as a psychologically and culturally mediated fear of identity disruption, not merely of poor aesthetic results. It is crucial to distinguish this construct from Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), which is characterized by a pathological internal distortion of self-perception and an obsessive pursuit of correction for non-existent or slight physical defects [<span>3</span>]. While BDD involves a persistent preoccupation with perceived flaws, FOF represents a rational, anticipatory concern regarding iatrogenic identity loss—the fear of “losing one's self” through clinical intervention. Furthermore, FOF is distinct from general procedural anxiety; while the latter is a physiological or psychological response to the medical act itself, FOF focuses specifically on the long-term aesthetic and psychosocial consequences of over-augmentation and the disruption of facial coherence. By articulating FOF as a distinct conceptual clinical construct, dermatologists are positioned as guardians of identity coherence amid an environment where unnatural aesthetic outcomes are simultaneously normalized and feared.</p><p>Modern patients frequently express concerns about looking “overdone” or “artificial,” worries heightened by the saturation of exaggerated outcomes on social media platforms [<span>4, 5</span>]. Digital filters, portrait-mode elongation, and reshaping algorithms have collectively shifted internal norms of facial proportions. Although these tools promote idealized images, they paradoxically reinforce fear toward aesthetic procedures.</p><p>In this context, FOF emerges primarily as a fear of identity loss, representing a fundamental shift in patient psychology: Aesthetic decisions are increasingly based not only on traditional risk–benefit considerations but on the perceived threat to personal recognizability. This shift is further intensified by the paradox of enhancement: Progressive modifications—either t
{"title":"The Fear of Overfilling (FOF): A Clinically Significant Response to Digital Aesthetics and the Dermatologist's Imperative to Preserve Facial Identity","authors":"Rafael Rodrigo Crisanto de Oliveira","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70652","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jocd.70652","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers remain the cornerstone of contemporary aesthetic dermatology, offering reversibility, predictable outcomes, and the capacity to rejuvenate while maintaining core facial identity when anatomically guided [<span>1, 2</span>]. Alongside the evolution in technique and safety, a parallel sociocultural transformation driven by digital aesthetics has reshaped public perception of fillers. Within this landscape, two interconnected phenomena have emerged as central to modern clinical practice: Overfilled Face Syndrome (OFS) and its psychological counterpart, the Fear of Overfilling (FOF). This commentary proposes FOF as a conceptual framework and heuristic tool rather than a formally validated diagnostic entity, serving to understand a clinically significant response to the hypervisibility of distorted aesthetic outcomes in digital environments. Recognizing FOF as a structured psychocultural phenomenon is essential for improving communication, enhancing adherence, and guiding modern treatment planning.</p><p>FOF is conceptualized as a psychologically and culturally mediated fear of identity disruption, not merely of poor aesthetic results. It is crucial to distinguish this construct from Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), which is characterized by a pathological internal distortion of self-perception and an obsessive pursuit of correction for non-existent or slight physical defects [<span>3</span>]. While BDD involves a persistent preoccupation with perceived flaws, FOF represents a rational, anticipatory concern regarding iatrogenic identity loss—the fear of “losing one's self” through clinical intervention. Furthermore, FOF is distinct from general procedural anxiety; while the latter is a physiological or psychological response to the medical act itself, FOF focuses specifically on the long-term aesthetic and psychosocial consequences of over-augmentation and the disruption of facial coherence. By articulating FOF as a distinct conceptual clinical construct, dermatologists are positioned as guardians of identity coherence amid an environment where unnatural aesthetic outcomes are simultaneously normalized and feared.</p><p>Modern patients frequently express concerns about looking “overdone” or “artificial,” worries heightened by the saturation of exaggerated outcomes on social media platforms [<span>4, 5</span>]. Digital filters, portrait-mode elongation, and reshaping algorithms have collectively shifted internal norms of facial proportions. Although these tools promote idealized images, they paradoxically reinforce fear toward aesthetic procedures.</p><p>In this context, FOF emerges primarily as a fear of identity loss, representing a fundamental shift in patient psychology: Aesthetic decisions are increasingly based not only on traditional risk–benefit considerations but on the perceived threat to personal recognizability. This shift is further intensified by the paradox of enhancement: Progressive modifications—either t","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12794127/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145952096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Barbara Hernandez-Rovira, Emma Villamaria, Julia Oh, Bengisu Ozarslan, Saranya Wyles
<p>Skin microbiome contributes to cutaneous homeostasis and barrier defense by regulating keratinocyte proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune responses [<span>1, 2</span>]. Carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) laser resurfacing, widely used for photoaging and scar revision, induces controlled dermal injury and transient skin barrier disruption to trigger the wound healing cascade. Topical carboxytherapy, which delivers CO<sub>2</sub> transdermally, is proposed to enhance tissue regeneration by improving oxygenation and microvascular perfusion [<span>3</span>]; however, its mechanistic impact on skin physiology and microbial communities remains poorly defined. Given the role of skin microbiota in wound healing and inflammation, understanding how these procedures affect microbial dynamics is clinically relevant. This pilot study aimed to characterize the facial skin microbiome following full-face CO<sub>2</sub> fractional resurfacing and post-procedural treatment with topical carboxytherapy (CO<sub>2</sub> Lift, Lumisque, Weston, FL).</p><p>Two participants were enrolled and assigned to one of two post-laser care groups: the placebo group (<i>n</i> = 1) received standard care with a petroleum-based ointment, while the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 1) was treated with a gel-formulated carboxytherapy. VISIA-CR (Canfield Scientific Inc., Parsippany, NJ) imaging was performed at baseline and 12 weeks post-procedure (Figure 1). Microbiome samples were collected from the left versus right malar cheek at baseline and week 4 using standardized swabbing. Microbial profiling was performed via 16S rRNA gene sequencing with genus-level taxonomic assignment; sequencing depth and diversity metrics were evaluated descriptively, without statistical testing, due to the limited sample size. Genus-level taxonomic composition is shown in Figure 2. Given that only one participant was included per group, this exploratory pilot study was not powered for statistical comparison between groups, and all findings are presented as hypothesis-generating observations without inference of group differences or treatment effects.</p><p><i>Cutibacterium</i> spp. was the dominant genus across all subjects, with bilateral detection at both time points. Relative abundance increased from 79% at baseline to 92% at week 4. <i>Corynebacterium</i> spp. was the second most abundant genus (11% at baseline, 3% at week 4), followed by low-abundance taxa including <i>Streptococcus</i> spp. and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. Alpha diversity patterns varied between participants at baseline and over time; both groups exhibited a slight decline. These findings are reported descriptively only. Beta diversity analysis suggested overall compositional stability within individuals between baseline and follow-up, though no formal clustering or between-group comparisons can be inferred.</p><p>An observed increase in the relative abundance of <i>Cutibacterium</i> spp., presumed to be <i>C. acnes</i>, following CO<
{"title":"Topical Carboxytherapy Modulates the Skin Microbiome Following CO2 Laser Resurfacing: A Pilot Study","authors":"Barbara Hernandez-Rovira, Emma Villamaria, Julia Oh, Bengisu Ozarslan, Saranya Wyles","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70668","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jocd.70668","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Skin microbiome contributes to cutaneous homeostasis and barrier defense by regulating keratinocyte proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune responses [<span>1, 2</span>]. Carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) laser resurfacing, widely used for photoaging and scar revision, induces controlled dermal injury and transient skin barrier disruption to trigger the wound healing cascade. Topical carboxytherapy, which delivers CO<sub>2</sub> transdermally, is proposed to enhance tissue regeneration by improving oxygenation and microvascular perfusion [<span>3</span>]; however, its mechanistic impact on skin physiology and microbial communities remains poorly defined. Given the role of skin microbiota in wound healing and inflammation, understanding how these procedures affect microbial dynamics is clinically relevant. This pilot study aimed to characterize the facial skin microbiome following full-face CO<sub>2</sub> fractional resurfacing and post-procedural treatment with topical carboxytherapy (CO<sub>2</sub> Lift, Lumisque, Weston, FL).</p><p>Two participants were enrolled and assigned to one of two post-laser care groups: the placebo group (<i>n</i> = 1) received standard care with a petroleum-based ointment, while the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 1) was treated with a gel-formulated carboxytherapy. VISIA-CR (Canfield Scientific Inc., Parsippany, NJ) imaging was performed at baseline and 12 weeks post-procedure (Figure 1). Microbiome samples were collected from the left versus right malar cheek at baseline and week 4 using standardized swabbing. Microbial profiling was performed via 16S rRNA gene sequencing with genus-level taxonomic assignment; sequencing depth and diversity metrics were evaluated descriptively, without statistical testing, due to the limited sample size. Genus-level taxonomic composition is shown in Figure 2. Given that only one participant was included per group, this exploratory pilot study was not powered for statistical comparison between groups, and all findings are presented as hypothesis-generating observations without inference of group differences or treatment effects.</p><p><i>Cutibacterium</i> spp. was the dominant genus across all subjects, with bilateral detection at both time points. Relative abundance increased from 79% at baseline to 92% at week 4. <i>Corynebacterium</i> spp. was the second most abundant genus (11% at baseline, 3% at week 4), followed by low-abundance taxa including <i>Streptococcus</i> spp. and <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp. Alpha diversity patterns varied between participants at baseline and over time; both groups exhibited a slight decline. These findings are reported descriptively only. Beta diversity analysis suggested overall compositional stability within individuals between baseline and follow-up, though no formal clustering or between-group comparisons can be inferred.</p><p>An observed increase in the relative abundance of <i>Cutibacterium</i> spp., presumed to be <i>C. acnes</i>, following CO<","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12793962/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145952103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}