首页 > 最新文献

Chinese Studies in Philosophy最新文献

英文 中文
The Idealistic Concept of a "Finite Universe" Must Be Criticized “有限宇宙”的理想主义观念必须受到批判
Pub Date : 1988-07-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-1467190480
Liu Bowen
On the question of whether the universe should be infinite or finite, there has been throughout the history of physics a struggle between materialism and idealism, between dialectics and metaphysics. Materialism asserts that the universe is infinite, while idealism advocates finitude. At every stage in the history of physics, these two philosophical lines have engaged in fierce struggle. Although developments in physics always demonstrate the failure of the finite universe doctrine, with every new advance in science the idealists distort and take advantage of the latest results of physics to "prove" with varying sleights of hand that the universe is finite, serving the reactionary rule of the moribund exploiting classes. In the early part of this century after the rise of quantum theory and relativity theory, physics arrived at a new stage of development. After General Relativity was announced in 1916, a lot of people used it and similar theories of gravity to produce all sorts of models of the universe. ...
在宇宙是无限的还是有限的问题上,在物理学的历史上,一直存在着唯物主义和唯心主义、辩证法和形而上学之间的斗争。唯物主义主张宇宙是无限的,而唯心主义主张宇宙是有限的。在物理学历史的每一个阶段,这两种哲学路线都进行着激烈的斗争。虽然物理学的发展总是表明有限宇宙学说的失败,但是随着科学的每一次新进展,唯心主义者歪曲和利用物理学的最新成果,用各种花招来“证明”宇宙是有限的,为垂死的剥削阶级的反动统治服务。本世纪初,随着量子理论和相对论的兴起,物理学进入了一个新的发展阶段。在1916年广义相对论被宣布后,很多人用它和类似的引力理论来建立各种各样的宇宙模型. ...
{"title":"The Idealistic Concept of a \"Finite Universe\" Must Be Criticized","authors":"Liu Bowen","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467190480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467190480","url":null,"abstract":"On the question of whether the universe should be infinite or finite, there has been throughout the history of physics a struggle between materialism and idealism, between dialectics and metaphysics. Materialism asserts that the universe is infinite, while idealism advocates finitude. At every stage in the history of physics, these two philosophical lines have engaged in fierce struggle. Although developments in physics always demonstrate the failure of the finite universe doctrine, with every new advance in science the idealists distort and take advantage of the latest results of physics to \"prove\" with varying sleights of hand that the universe is finite, serving the reactionary rule of the moribund exploiting classes. In the early part of this century after the rise of quantum theory and relativity theory, physics arrived at a new stage of development. After General Relativity was announced in 1916, a lot of people used it and similar theories of gravity to produce all sorts of models of the universe. ...","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115682833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fang Lizhi—The Republic Needs This Kind of Scholar 方励之——共和国需要这样的学者
Pub Date : 1988-07-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-1467190488
Wu Guosheng
On the morning of February 27, 1955, in the auditorium of the administration building of Beijing University, the Communist Youth League's (CYL) first Beijing University congress was proceeding according to its prearranged agenda. The physics department general branch secretary was speaking at the podium. Just as he was proposing that the CYL should devote its efforts to fostering idealism among youth, a fresh-faced lad sprang up from the western side of the delegation. He leapt onto the podium and gestured that he wanted to make an impromptu speech. With youthful enthusiasm he assumed the line of discussion begun by the branch secretary. At our CYL congress, he said, the first order of business should be what kind of person we're trying to produce. Do we want guileless, law-abiding bookworms who only repeat what other people say, or do we want patriotic, creative "red experts" with lofty aspirations? Apart from making "A's" in school, shouldn't we also be developing our capacity to think independently?…
1955年2月27日上午,在北京大学行政大楼大礼堂里,共青团北京大学第一次代表大会正在按照预定的议程进行。物理系总支书记在讲台上讲话。就在他提议共青团应该致力于培养年轻人的理想主义时,代表团的西侧突然出现了一个年轻的小伙子。他跳上讲台,做了个手势,表示要做即席演讲。他怀着青年人的热情,参加了支部书记开始的讨论。在我们的团代会上,他说,首要问题应该是我们要培养什么样的人。我们要的是诚实、守法、只会重复别人话语的书呆子,还是爱国、有创造力、胸怀大志的“红色专家”?除了在学校得“A”,我们难道不应该培养独立思考的能力吗?…
{"title":"Fang Lizhi—The Republic Needs This Kind of Scholar","authors":"Wu Guosheng","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467190488","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467190488","url":null,"abstract":"On the morning of February 27, 1955, in the auditorium of the administration building of Beijing University, the Communist Youth League's (CYL) first Beijing University congress was proceeding according to its prearranged agenda. The physics department general branch secretary was speaking at the podium. Just as he was proposing that the CYL should devote its efforts to fostering idealism among youth, a fresh-faced lad sprang up from the western side of the delegation. He leapt onto the podium and gestured that he wanted to make an impromptu speech. With youthful enthusiasm he assumed the line of discussion begun by the branch secretary. At our CYL congress, he said, the first order of business should be what kind of person we're trying to produce. Do we want guileless, law-abiding bookworms who only repeat what other people say, or do we want patriotic, creative \"red experts\" with lofty aspirations? Apart from making \"A's\" in school, shouldn't we also be developing our capacity to think independently?…","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"4300 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126575415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
No Science Can Ever Replace Marxist Philosophy 任何科学都不能代替马克思主义哲学
Pub Date : 1988-07-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-1467190484
Jin Lin
In the development of science in the twentieth century, there has been on the one hand a tendency toward diversification, while on the other hand there has been a tendency toward unification. Between different disciplines, interdisciplinary studies have emerged. Accompanying the rapid development of socialist reconstruction and social reform in our country, the gigantic and far-reaching impetus provided by science to all aspects of life in our society is increasingly apparent. In the face of this situation, some comrades believe that in actual scientific research and other aspects of scientific work, the only guidance that is needed is provided by the methodologies of the scientific disciplines themselves, or perhaps by a more generalized interdisciplinary science (such as systems theory, information theory, or cybernetics). The guidance of Marxist philosophy is no longer required. This viewpoint calls for discussion.
在20世纪的科学发展中,一方面出现了多样化的趋势,另一方面也出现了统一化的趋势。在不同的学科之间,出现了跨学科的研究。随着我国社会主义建设和社会改革的快速发展,科学对我国社会生活各个方面的巨大而深远的推动日益显现。面对这种情况,有些同志认为,在实际的科学研究和科学工作的其他方面,唯一需要的指导是由科学学科本身的方法提供的,或者也许是由更广义的跨学科科学(如系统论、信息论或控制论)提供的。不再需要马克思主义哲学的指导。这个观点值得讨论。
{"title":"No Science Can Ever Replace Marxist Philosophy","authors":"Jin Lin","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467190484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467190484","url":null,"abstract":"In the development of science in the twentieth century, there has been on the one hand a tendency toward diversification, while on the other hand there has been a tendency toward unification. Between different disciplines, interdisciplinary studies have emerged. Accompanying the rapid development of socialist reconstruction and social reform in our country, the gigantic and far-reaching impetus provided by science to all aspects of life in our society is increasingly apparent. In the face of this situation, some comrades believe that in actual scientific research and other aspects of scientific work, the only guidance that is needed is provided by the methodologies of the scientific disciplines themselves, or perhaps by a more generalized interdisciplinary science (such as systems theory, information theory, or cybernetics). The guidance of Marxist philosophy is no longer required. This viewpoint calls for discussion.","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128901852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Culture in Ancient China 中国古代文化
Pub Date : 1988-04-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-146719033
Feng Tianyu
Every nation possesses its own culture. Furthermore, the ethnic attributes of the nationality are deeply embedded in its national culture, and the latter, in turn, expresses and reveals the former in many facets. As Hegel once pointed out: "A nation's religion, as well as its political system, its ethics and human relations, its legal system, its mores and customs, indeed even its science, arts, and skills all possess the markings of the nation's spirit." Naturally, these "markings of the nation's spirit" do not come from the endowment of a Creator, or as the product of some a priori idealization and rationalization. Rather, they are grown out of the deep and rich soil of the nation's life. The discrepancies between characteristics among nations are created out of the plurality of the geographical environments in which the nations have been placed, the material modes of production they have pursued, and the forms of social organization they have erected. Therefore, when we conduct an investigation of the ...
每个民族都有自己的文化。此外,民族的民族属性深深嵌入其民族文化中,而后者又在许多方面表达和揭示了民族属性。正如黑格尔曾经指出的:“一个民族的宗教,以及它的政治制度、伦理和人际关系、法律制度、风俗习惯,甚至它的科学、艺术和技能,都具有这个民族精神的标志。”当然,这些“民族精神的标记”不是来自造物主的天赋,也不是某种先验的理想化和合理化的产物。相反,他们生长在深厚而肥沃的民族生活土壤中。各民族特征之间的差异是由各民族所处的地理环境的多样性、他们所追求的物质生产方式以及他们所建立的社会组织形式造成的。因此,当我们对……进行调查时。
{"title":"Culture in Ancient China","authors":"Feng Tianyu","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-146719033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-146719033","url":null,"abstract":"Every nation possesses its own culture. Furthermore, the ethnic attributes of the nationality are deeply embedded in its national culture, and the latter, in turn, expresses and reveals the former in many facets. As Hegel once pointed out: \"A nation's religion, as well as its political system, its ethics and human relations, its legal system, its mores and customs, indeed even its science, arts, and skills all possess the markings of the nation's spirit.\" Naturally, these \"markings of the nation's spirit\" do not come from the endowment of a Creator, or as the product of some a priori idealization and rationalization. Rather, they are grown out of the deep and rich soil of the nation's life. The discrepancies between characteristics among nations are created out of the plurality of the geographical environments in which the nations have been placed, the material modes of production they have pursued, and the forms of social organization they have erected. Therefore, when we conduct an investigation of the ...","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127427390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Chinese Culture and Chinese Philosophy 中国文化与中国哲学
Pub Date : 1988-04-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-1467190369
Zhang Dainian
Chinese culture has undergone a long process of evolution. Culture evolves in accordance with the evolution of the socioeconomic base. The evolution of culture and of philosophical thought are intricately related. If we are to understand China's culture we must first comprehend its philosophy.
中国文化经历了一个漫长的演变过程。文化随着社会经济基础的演变而演变。文化的演变与哲学思想的演变有着错综复杂的联系。要了解中国文化,首先要了解中国哲学。
{"title":"Chinese Culture and Chinese Philosophy","authors":"Zhang Dainian","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467190369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467190369","url":null,"abstract":"Chinese culture has undergone a long process of evolution. Culture evolves in accordance with the evolution of the socioeconomic base. The evolution of culture and of philosophical thought are intricately related. If we are to understand China's culture we must first comprehend its philosophy.","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133516256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
On the Legends of Yao, Shun, and Yu and the Origins of Chinese Civilization 尧、舜、禹传说与中华文明的起源
Pub Date : 1988-04-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-1467190321
Tian Changwu
China is one of the oldest civilized countries in the world, and yet the history of the Chinese civilization is shrouded in a dense mist. The ancient Chinese document Shiben (The Origin of the Ages...
中国是世界上最古老的文明国家之一,但中华文明史却迷雾重重。中国古代文献《时代的起源》……
{"title":"On the Legends of Yao, Shun, and Yu and the Origins of Chinese Civilization","authors":"Tian Changwu","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467190321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467190321","url":null,"abstract":"China is one of the oldest civilized countries in the world, and yet the history of the Chinese civilization is shrouded in a dense mist. The ancient Chinese document Shiben (The Origin of the Ages...","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1988-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122349611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The Philosophical Thought of Ji Kang 嵇康的哲学思想
Pub Date : 1987-10-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-1467190164
Liu Kang-de
Ji Kang (224-263) was a great writer and thinker of the Wei-Jin period. He said that he was "indebted to Laozi and Zhuangzi" (Poems of Hidden Anger [Youfenshi]), and that "Laozi and Zhuangzi are my teachers" ("Letter Breaking with Shan Juyuan" [Yu Shan Juyuan juejiao yishu]). But unlike He Yan and Wang Bi, Ji Kang did not accept Laozi's idea that "Being comes from Nonbeing." He did not take the mental construct of "Nonbeing" as the source or origin of the universe, nor did he, as some comrades suggest, take the material, physical "qi" (material force) as the foundation of the existence of all things in the universe. In Ji Kang's view, "Where is this Being and Nonbeing?" That is, why should we conceive of "Being" or "Nonbeing" as the source or origin of the universe? He proposed transcending totally the mysticism of "Being" and "Nonbeing." The present article will discuss a few aspects of this question.
嵇康(224-263)是魏晋时期伟大的文学家和思想家。他说他“感谢老子和庄子”(《隐怒诗》),说“老子和庄子是我的老师”(《与单居远断信》[于单居远绝交亦舒])。但与何言、王弼不同的是,嵇康并不接受老子“非有而有”的思想。他没有把“无”的心理构念当作宇宙的本源,也没有像有些同志说的那样,把物质的、物理的“气”(物质力)当作宇宙万物存在的基础。在嵇康看来,“有与无在哪里?”也就是说,为什么我们要把“存在”或“不存在”想象成宇宙的源头或起源?他主张彻底超越“有”与“无”的神秘主义。本文将讨论这个问题的几个方面。
{"title":"The Philosophical Thought of Ji Kang","authors":"Liu Kang-de","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467190164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467190164","url":null,"abstract":"Ji Kang (224-263) was a great writer and thinker of the Wei-Jin period. He said that he was \"indebted to Laozi and Zhuangzi\" (Poems of Hidden Anger [Youfenshi]), and that \"Laozi and Zhuangzi are my teachers\" (\"Letter Breaking with Shan Juyuan\" [Yu Shan Juyuan juejiao yishu]). But unlike He Yan and Wang Bi, Ji Kang did not accept Laozi's idea that \"Being comes from Nonbeing.\" He did not take the mental construct of \"Nonbeing\" as the source or origin of the universe, nor did he, as some comrades suggest, take the material, physical \"qi\" (material force) as the foundation of the existence of all things in the universe. In Ji Kang's view, \"Where is this Being and Nonbeing?\" That is, why should we conceive of \"Being\" or \"Nonbeing\" as the source or origin of the universe? He proposed transcending totally the mysticism of \"Being\" and \"Nonbeing.\" The present article will discuss a few aspects of this question.","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1987-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116620999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On Heaven, Dao, Qi, Li, and Ze 论天、道、气、理、泽
Pub Date : 1987-10-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-146719013
Zhang Dainian
"Heaven" is an important concept in ancient Chinese philosophy. In earliest times, "heaven" had two meanings: one referred to an anthropomorphic god, the other to the sky, the heavens, the complement of earth. Early religious thought believed that heaven had consciousness and was the supreme ruler of the world. When Confucius spoke of "heaven" he thought of it in this sense of the supreme ruler, as when he said, "If heaven had really intended this culture to perish, then later generations would not have obtained this culture. Since heaven has not destroyed this culture, what can the people of Kuang do about it!" (Analects, 9:5). The rise and fall of cultures, as well as the safety and danger of the individual, are determined by heaven. But when talking about heaven, Confucius sometimes was referring to Nature, as when he said, "How great a prince was Yao. Ah, yes! Only heaven is great, only Yao followed it" (Analects, 8:19). The statement "Only heaven is great" cannot be explained as meaning that only god...
“天”是中国古代哲学中的一个重要概念。在最早的时代,“天”有两个意思:一个是指拟人化的神,另一个是指天空,天堂,地球的补充。早期的宗教思想认为,天堂有意识,是世界的最高统治者。当孔子谈到“天”时,他认为这是最高统治者的意思,就像他说的那样:“如果天真的要毁灭这个文化,那么后世就不会有这个文化了。”既然上天没有毁灭这种文化,匡人又有什么办法呢?”(《论语》,九5)。文化的兴衰,个人的安全与危险,都是上天决定的。但当谈到天堂时,孔子有时指的是自然,如他说:“多么伟大的王子尧。啊,是的!只有天是伟大的,只有尧遵循它”(论语,8:19)。“只有天堂是伟大的”这句话不能解释为只有上帝是伟大的。
{"title":"On Heaven, Dao, Qi, Li, and Ze","authors":"Zhang Dainian","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-146719013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-146719013","url":null,"abstract":"\"Heaven\" is an important concept in ancient Chinese philosophy. In earliest times, \"heaven\" had two meanings: one referred to an anthropomorphic god, the other to the sky, the heavens, the complement of earth. Early religious thought believed that heaven had consciousness and was the supreme ruler of the world. When Confucius spoke of \"heaven\" he thought of it in this sense of the supreme ruler, as when he said, \"If heaven had really intended this culture to perish, then later generations would not have obtained this culture. Since heaven has not destroyed this culture, what can the people of Kuang do about it!\" (Analects, 9:5). The rise and fall of cultures, as well as the safety and danger of the individual, are determined by heaven. But when talking about heaven, Confucius sometimes was referring to Nature, as when he said, \"How great a prince was Yao. Ah, yes! Only heaven is great, only Yao followed it\" (Analects, 8:19). The statement \"Only heaven is great\" cannot be explained as meaning that only god...","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1987-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133558325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recent Developments in Studies of the Book of Changes 《易经》研究的新进展
Pub Date : 1987-10-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-1467190146
Tang Ming-bang
In the current "Eastern culture fad" now engulfing the East Asian mainland, the Book of Changes, that repository of "shining mysteries" that symbolizes the special quality of East Asian culture, has attracted considerable attention. Over the past several thousand years, the Book of Changes has played an extremely important role in molding the foundation of China's great intellectual tradition. It is for this reason that this work has always been so highly regarded as "the first of the Six Classics," as "one of the three mysteries." But the extent and depth of the present studies of the Book of Changes are unprecedented. The Book of Changes was first introduced to the West in the seventeenth century and, arousing the interest of Western scholars, was translated into one language after another. But never before have so many scholars in so many countries been so caught up in studying the Book of Changes as at present. The reason this work has attracted such universal attention is in part the particular condi...
在席卷东亚大陆的“东方文化热潮”中,《易经》这个象征着东亚文化特殊品质的“闪光的奥秘”宝库引起了相当大的关注。在过去的几千年里,《易经》在塑造中国伟大思想传统的基础方面发挥了极其重要的作用。正因为如此,这部作品才一直被尊称为“六经之首”、“三大奥秘之一”。但目前对《易经》研究的广度和深度都是前所未有的。《易经》于十七世纪首次传入西方,引起了西方学者的兴趣,被翻译成一种又一种语言。但是,从来没有像现在这样,在这么多的国家里,有这么多的学者对《易经》如此着迷。这项工作引起如此普遍关注的部分原因是其特殊的条件。
{"title":"Recent Developments in Studies of the Book of Changes","authors":"Tang Ming-bang","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467190146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467190146","url":null,"abstract":"In the current \"Eastern culture fad\" now engulfing the East Asian mainland, the Book of Changes, that repository of \"shining mysteries\" that symbolizes the special quality of East Asian culture, has attracted considerable attention. Over the past several thousand years, the Book of Changes has played an extremely important role in molding the foundation of China's great intellectual tradition. It is for this reason that this work has always been so highly regarded as \"the first of the Six Classics,\" as \"one of the three mysteries.\" But the extent and depth of the present studies of the Book of Changes are unprecedented. The Book of Changes was first introduced to the West in the seventeenth century and, arousing the interest of Western scholars, was translated into one language after another. But never before have so many scholars in so many countries been so caught up in studying the Book of Changes as at present. The reason this work has attracted such universal attention is in part the particular condi...","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1987-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124620743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Brief Survey of the Differences within the Nonbeing Faction of the School of Metaphysics 略论形而上学学派非存在派内部的分歧
Pub Date : 1987-10-01 DOI: 10.2753/CSP1097-1467190172
Liu Kang-de, Yuanzhen Peng
The School of Metaphysics (Xuanxue) of the Wei-Jin period was an important link in the history of the development of Chinese philosophical thought. Although there have been studies analyzing the birth and development of the Wei-Jin School of Metaphysics, up to the present there has been little discussion of the differences existing within the Nonbeing Faction (Guiwupai) of the School of Metaphysics. The Nonbeing Faction of the School of Metaphysics is generally conceived of as being composed of He Yan, Wang Bi, Wang Yan, and others, among whom Wang Bi is often regarded as the principal representative of this group, which is thought of as using "Nonbeing is the foundation" or "honor Nonbeing" as the intellectual weapon of the powerful gentry of their times. But we feel that this view would appear to be rather oversimplified. An analysis of the extant historical sources shows that there were differences in many different areas among those generally belonging to the Nonbeing Faction.
魏晋时期的玄学学派是中国哲学思想发展史上的一个重要环节。虽然已有研究分析了魏晋玄学的产生和发展,但迄今为止,对玄学无我派内部存在的分歧的讨论还很少。玄学无我派一般被认为是由何岩、王弼、王岩等人组成的,其中王弼常被认为是该派的主要代表人物,被认为是以“无我为本”或“尊无”为当时权贵士绅的思想武器。但我们认为这种观点似乎过于简单化了。对现存历史资料的分析表明,一般属于非存在派的人在许多不同的领域存在差异。
{"title":"Brief Survey of the Differences within the Nonbeing Faction of the School of Metaphysics","authors":"Liu Kang-de, Yuanzhen Peng","doi":"10.2753/CSP1097-1467190172","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467190172","url":null,"abstract":"The School of Metaphysics (Xuanxue) of the Wei-Jin period was an important link in the history of the development of Chinese philosophical thought. Although there have been studies analyzing the birth and development of the Wei-Jin School of Metaphysics, up to the present there has been little discussion of the differences existing within the Nonbeing Faction (Guiwupai) of the School of Metaphysics. The Nonbeing Faction of the School of Metaphysics is generally conceived of as being composed of He Yan, Wang Bi, Wang Yan, and others, among whom Wang Bi is often regarded as the principal representative of this group, which is thought of as using \"Nonbeing is the foundation\" or \"honor Nonbeing\" as the intellectual weapon of the powerful gentry of their times. But we feel that this view would appear to be rather oversimplified. An analysis of the extant historical sources shows that there were differences in many different areas among those generally belonging to the Nonbeing Faction.","PeriodicalId":162534,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Studies in Philosophy","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1987-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114936443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Chinese Studies in Philosophy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1