Arwa Badahdah,Arwa Banjar,Amal Jamjoom,Mohammad Assaggaf,Lina Bahanan,Reem A Asiri,Reem Alsulami,Shatha Bamashmous,Brian L Mealey
BACKGROUNDAccurate periodontal disease diagnosis is essential for optimal treatment planning and patient care. However, variability in applying the 2017 Periodontal Classification may affect diagnostic reliability and treatment outcomes. This study investigated diagnostic accuracy and consistency among periodontists, periodontal residents, and dental interns in Saudi Arabia.METHODSForty-four participants, including 13 periodontists, 14 periodontal residents, and 17 dental interns, independently classified 25 periodontitis cases. Agreement with a gold-standard diagnosis, established by expert periodontists using the 2017 Classification System, was assessed using descriptive statistics. Chi-square tests with Bonferroni-adjusted z-tests were used to compare agreement levels between rater groups. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Fleiss' kappa, while Cohen's kappa was used to assess intra-rater reliability.RESULTSPeriodontists demonstrated the highest agreement with the gold standard (92.0%) for periodontitis diagnosis. Staging agreement was highest among residents (51.7%) and periodontists (49.1%). Grading accuracy was highest for grade C cases across all groups (60.7%). Underestimation was common across rater groups, with interns exhibiting the highest rates in staging (49.6%) and grading (58.3%). The second assessment demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy across all groups. Inter-rater reliability ranged from fair to moderate across rater groups (κ = 0.22-0.60). Intra-rater reliability was highest among interns, indicating substantial agreement (κ = 0.63-0.75).CONCLUSIONFindings highlight considerable variability in the application of the 2017 Periodontal Classification among dental professionals, underscoring the role of clinical experience and training in influencing diagnostic accuracy. Structured calibration and targeted educational strategies are essential to improve diagnostic consistency, minimize misclassification, and support optimal patient care.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYUnderstanding gum disease correctly is important for providing patients with the right treatments. This study looked at how accurately different groups of dental professionals - specialists in gum disease (periodontists), dentists in training (residents), and recent dental graduates (interns) - could diagnose cases of periodontitis using a new system called the 2017 Periodontal Classification. A group of expert periodontists created a "gold-standard" diagnosis for comparison. We found that periodontists were the most accurate, while interns had more difficulty correctly identifying disease severity. Across all groups, many participants underestimated how serious the cases were. Participants were better at recognizing advanced disease compared to milder forms. When the participants repeated the diagnosis of the cases later, their accuracy improved, suggesting that practice and training help. Our results show that diagnosing gum disease can vary depending on exp
{"title":"Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and consistency in applying the 2017 periodontal classification among dental professionals.","authors":"Arwa Badahdah,Arwa Banjar,Amal Jamjoom,Mohammad Assaggaf,Lina Bahanan,Reem A Asiri,Reem Alsulami,Shatha Bamashmous,Brian L Mealey","doi":"10.1002/jper.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.70011","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDAccurate periodontal disease diagnosis is essential for optimal treatment planning and patient care. However, variability in applying the 2017 Periodontal Classification may affect diagnostic reliability and treatment outcomes. This study investigated diagnostic accuracy and consistency among periodontists, periodontal residents, and dental interns in Saudi Arabia.METHODSForty-four participants, including 13 periodontists, 14 periodontal residents, and 17 dental interns, independently classified 25 periodontitis cases. Agreement with a gold-standard diagnosis, established by expert periodontists using the 2017 Classification System, was assessed using descriptive statistics. Chi-square tests with Bonferroni-adjusted z-tests were used to compare agreement levels between rater groups. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Fleiss' kappa, while Cohen's kappa was used to assess intra-rater reliability.RESULTSPeriodontists demonstrated the highest agreement with the gold standard (92.0%) for periodontitis diagnosis. Staging agreement was highest among residents (51.7%) and periodontists (49.1%). Grading accuracy was highest for grade C cases across all groups (60.7%). Underestimation was common across rater groups, with interns exhibiting the highest rates in staging (49.6%) and grading (58.3%). The second assessment demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy across all groups. Inter-rater reliability ranged from fair to moderate across rater groups (κ = 0.22-0.60). Intra-rater reliability was highest among interns, indicating substantial agreement (κ = 0.63-0.75).CONCLUSIONFindings highlight considerable variability in the application of the 2017 Periodontal Classification among dental professionals, underscoring the role of clinical experience and training in influencing diagnostic accuracy. Structured calibration and targeted educational strategies are essential to improve diagnostic consistency, minimize misclassification, and support optimal patient care.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYUnderstanding gum disease correctly is important for providing patients with the right treatments. This study looked at how accurately different groups of dental professionals - specialists in gum disease (periodontists), dentists in training (residents), and recent dental graduates (interns) - could diagnose cases of periodontitis using a new system called the 2017 Periodontal Classification. A group of expert periodontists created a \"gold-standard\" diagnosis for comparison. We found that periodontists were the most accurate, while interns had more difficulty correctly identifying disease severity. Across all groups, many participants underestimated how serious the cases were. Participants were better at recognizing advanced disease compared to milder forms. When the participants repeated the diagnosis of the cases later, their accuracy improved, suggesting that practice and training help. Our results show that diagnosing gum disease can vary depending on exp","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145068432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BACKGROUNDRecent advancements in bone tissue biomarker research have identified 2 promising molecules: Dickkopf-1 and secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5. This study aims to evaluate the levels of these biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid in periodontal health, gingivitis, and periodontitis and to assess the effects of non-surgical periodontal treatment on these biomarkers.METHODSA total of 99 adult subjects were included in this study, divided into 3 groups: 33 periodontally healthy individuals, 33 with gingivitis, and 33 with periodontitis. Patients in the gingivitis and periodontitis groups received non-surgical periodontal treatment. Periodontal clinical parameters were recorded, and gingival crevicular fluid levels of biomarkers were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline and 6-8 weeks post-treatment.RESULTSPre-treatment Dickkopf-1 levels were found to be highest in the periodontitis group (p < 0.001). Conversely, secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 levels were highest in the healthy group (p < 0.001). Post-treatment, a statistically significant reduction in Dickkopf-1 levels was observed in the gingivitis (p = 0.015) and periodontitis (p < 0.001) groups, while secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 levels significantly increased (respectively, p = 0.008 and p < 0.001). A statistically significant weak negative correlation was identified between total Dickkopf-1 and secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 levels (τ = -0.117, p = 0.027). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to assess diagnostic performance between periodontal health and periodontitis revealed an area under the curve of 0.938 for Dickkopf-1 and 0.803 for secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5.CONCLUSIONSThese biomarkers could serve as valuable biomarkers in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. Non-surgical periodontal treatment significantly affects the levels of these biomarkers, indicating their potential utility in monitoring therapeutic outcomes.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYIn the human body, bone tissue is in a state of constant balance of production and destruction. This balance supports the maintenance of the mechanical integrity of the skeleton and the regulation of calcium and phosphorus levels. Bone markers have been developed to monitor various bone diseases and the effect of treatments without any interventional procedures. Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) and secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 (sFRP5) are two of the current bone markers that play a role in the balance of bone formation and destruction in the human body. The presence of these molecules in periodontal diseases, which cause inflammation and bone destruction in the gingiva surrounding the teeth, is not yet clear. In this study, Dkk-1 and sFRP5 levels were investigated in periodontal diseases, and the effect of treatment of periodontal diseases on these molecules was evaluated. In the transition from periodontal disease to health, Dkk-1 levels decreased while sFRP5 levels increased. Consistent
{"title":"The effect of non-surgical periodontal treatment on Dickkopf-1 and secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 levels.","authors":"Sukran Acipinar,Kubilay Baris","doi":"10.1002/jper.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.70005","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDRecent advancements in bone tissue biomarker research have identified 2 promising molecules: Dickkopf-1 and secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5. This study aims to evaluate the levels of these biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid in periodontal health, gingivitis, and periodontitis and to assess the effects of non-surgical periodontal treatment on these biomarkers.METHODSA total of 99 adult subjects were included in this study, divided into 3 groups: 33 periodontally healthy individuals, 33 with gingivitis, and 33 with periodontitis. Patients in the gingivitis and periodontitis groups received non-surgical periodontal treatment. Periodontal clinical parameters were recorded, and gingival crevicular fluid levels of biomarkers were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline and 6-8 weeks post-treatment.RESULTSPre-treatment Dickkopf-1 levels were found to be highest in the periodontitis group (p < 0.001). Conversely, secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 levels were highest in the healthy group (p < 0.001). Post-treatment, a statistically significant reduction in Dickkopf-1 levels was observed in the gingivitis (p = 0.015) and periodontitis (p < 0.001) groups, while secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 levels significantly increased (respectively, p = 0.008 and p < 0.001). A statistically significant weak negative correlation was identified between total Dickkopf-1 and secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 levels (τ = -0.117, p = 0.027). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to assess diagnostic performance between periodontal health and periodontitis revealed an area under the curve of 0.938 for Dickkopf-1 and 0.803 for secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5.CONCLUSIONSThese biomarkers could serve as valuable biomarkers in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. Non-surgical periodontal treatment significantly affects the levels of these biomarkers, indicating their potential utility in monitoring therapeutic outcomes.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYIn the human body, bone tissue is in a state of constant balance of production and destruction. This balance supports the maintenance of the mechanical integrity of the skeleton and the regulation of calcium and phosphorus levels. Bone markers have been developed to monitor various bone diseases and the effect of treatments without any interventional procedures. Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) and secreted Frizzled-Related Protein 5 (sFRP5) are two of the current bone markers that play a role in the balance of bone formation and destruction in the human body. The presence of these molecules in periodontal diseases, which cause inflammation and bone destruction in the gingiva surrounding the teeth, is not yet clear. In this study, Dkk-1 and sFRP5 levels were investigated in periodontal diseases, and the effect of treatment of periodontal diseases on these molecules was evaluated. In the transition from periodontal disease to health, Dkk-1 levels decreased while sFRP5 levels increased. Consistent","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145068379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}