首页 > 最新文献

Land Use Policy最新文献

英文 中文
Corrigendum to “Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security” [Land Use Policy 128 (2023), 106601] “耕地资源安全预警与控制措施研究”的勘误表[土地利用政策128 (2023),106601]
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107885
Xueqing Sun , Pengcheng Xiang , Kexin Cong
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security” [Land Use Policy 128 (2023), 106601]","authors":"Xueqing Sun , Pengcheng Xiang , Kexin Cong","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107885","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107885","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107885"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Urban land use prediction and construction effectiveness assessment supporting SDG 11.3.1 and regional planning goals 支持可持续发展目标11.3.1和区域规划目标的城市土地利用预测与建设效益评价
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107893
Ze Zhang , Weiguo Jiang , Ziyan Ling , Xudong Guo , Jie Song , Zhijie Xiao , Xiaogan Yin
Urban land use serves as the fundamental foundation for human survival and development, providing essential natural resources. Simulation is an important tool for assessing the impacts of urban planning and construction new urban. To support policy implementation for the development of the Xiongan New Area and promote sustainable urban management, we use the "Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom" (DIKW model) as a framework for predicting future land spatial changes considering sustainable development of urban planning. We developed a novel New Urban Multi-objective Land Use Prediction (NUMLUP) method, integrating a Genetic Algorithm (GA), Multi-Objective Planning (MOP), and the Conversion of Land Use and its Effects at Small Region Extent (CLUES) model. Using this approach, we obtained urban land spatial distribution data for three scenarios. Urban land spatial distribution data for the Historical Continuation Scenario (HCS), Policy Planning Scenario (PPS), and Planned Sustainable development scenario (PSDS) were obtained. To evaluate Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11.3.1 and Regional Planning Goals (RPGs), we assessed 19 consecutive years of construction effectiveness—covering both past (2017–2023) and future (2023–2035) periods under the three scenarios. The dataset achieved a multi-year overall accuracy (OA) exceeding 0.87 and a kappa index above 0.83, demonstrating strong integration of the NUMLUP model. The area of built up gradually increased, and the wetland was mainly dominated by Baiyangdian, which declined significantly from 2017 to 2023. In the three scenarios, from 2023 to 2035, the expansion of the built-up slows down, and the degree of change in the HCS area is minimal. Under the PPS, forest and wetland areas underwent the most drastic changes, with overall improvement rates ranked as PPS > PSDS > HCS. In contrast, the PSDS led to a significant increase in grassland. Under PSDS, grassland increased significantly. The construction of the three scenarios from 2017 to 2035 has achieved certain results. While PPS and PSDS closely aligned with planning targets, the HCS would fail to meet the 2035 requirements. The PSDS also prompted adjustments in the regional policy’s spatial layout. There were adjustments to the spatial layout of the policy as a result of PSDS. The LCRPGR is consistently greater than 1 from 2023 to 2035, reflecting a rational and comfortable urban plan that provides land use to meet population growth and demand.Furthermore, the PSDS introduced reasonable modifications to the regional plan’s spatial configuration. Our research provides robust support for monitoring sustainable urban development and implementing regional policies.
城市土地利用是人类生存和发展的根本基础,提供了必不可少的自然资源。模拟是评估城市规划和新建城市影响的重要工具。为了支持雄安新区发展政策的实施,促进城市可持续管理,我们采用“数据-信息-知识-智慧”(DIKW)模型作为框架,预测考虑城市可持续发展规划的未来土地空间变化。基于遗传算法(GA)、多目标规划(MOP)和小区域范围土地利用转换及其影响(CLUES)模型,提出了一种新的城市多目标土地利用预测方法(NUMLUP)。利用该方法,我们获得了三种场景下的城市土地空间分布数据。获取了历史延续情景(HCS)、政策规划情景(PPS)和规划可持续发展情景(PSDS)下的城市土地空间分布数据。为了评估可持续发展目标11.3.1和区域规划目标(rpg),我们在三种情景下评估了连续19年的建筑效果,包括过去(2017-2023)和未来(2023-2035)。该数据集的多年总体精度(OA)超过0.87,kappa指数超过0.83,显示了NUMLUP模型的强集成。建成面积逐渐增加,以白洋淀湿地为主,2017 - 2023年明显减少。三种情景下,2023 - 2035年建成区扩张速度放缓,HCS区域变化程度最小。在PPS下,森林和湿地地区的变化最为剧烈,整体改善率为PPS >; PSDS >; HCS。相比之下,PSDS导致草地面积显著增加。在PSDS下,草地面积显著增加。2017 - 2035年三个场景的构建取得了一定成效。虽然PPS和PSDS与规划目标密切相关,但HCS将无法满足2035年的要求。PSDS还促使了区域政策空间布局的调整。由于PSDS,该政策的空间布局有所调整。从2023年到2035年,LCRPGR一直大于1,反映了一个合理和舒适的城市规划,提供土地利用来满足人口增长和需求。此外,PSDS对区域规划的空间配置进行了合理的修改。我们的研究为监测可持续城市发展和实施区域政策提供了强有力的支持。
{"title":"Urban land use prediction and construction effectiveness assessment supporting SDG 11.3.1 and regional planning goals","authors":"Ze Zhang ,&nbsp;Weiguo Jiang ,&nbsp;Ziyan Ling ,&nbsp;Xudong Guo ,&nbsp;Jie Song ,&nbsp;Zhijie Xiao ,&nbsp;Xiaogan Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107893","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107893","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban land use serves as the fundamental foundation for human survival and development, providing essential natural resources. Simulation is an important tool for assessing the impacts of urban planning and construction new urban. To support policy implementation for the development of the Xiongan New Area and promote sustainable urban management, we use the \"Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom\" (DIKW model) as a framework for predicting future land spatial changes considering sustainable development of urban planning. We developed a novel New Urban Multi-objective Land Use Prediction (NUMLUP) method, integrating a Genetic Algorithm (GA), Multi-Objective Planning (MOP), and the Conversion of Land Use and its Effects at Small Region Extent (CLUES) model. Using this approach, we obtained urban land spatial distribution data for three scenarios. Urban land spatial distribution data for the Historical Continuation Scenario (HCS), Policy Planning Scenario (PPS), and Planned Sustainable development scenario (PSDS) were obtained. To evaluate Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11.3.1 and Regional Planning Goals (RPGs), we assessed 19 consecutive years of construction effectiveness—covering both past (2017–2023) and future (2023–2035) periods under the three scenarios. The dataset achieved a multi-year overall accuracy (OA) exceeding 0.87 and a kappa index above 0.83, demonstrating strong integration of the NUMLUP model. The area of built up gradually increased, and the wetland was mainly dominated by Baiyangdian, which declined significantly from 2017 to 2023. In the three scenarios, from 2023 to 2035, the expansion of the built-up slows down, and the degree of change in the HCS area is minimal. Under the PPS, forest and wetland areas underwent the most drastic changes, with overall improvement rates ranked as PPS &gt; PSDS &gt; HCS. In contrast, the PSDS led to a significant increase in grassland. Under PSDS, grassland increased significantly. The construction of the three scenarios from 2017 to 2035 has achieved certain results. While PPS and PSDS closely aligned with planning targets, the HCS would fail to meet the 2035 requirements. The PSDS also prompted adjustments in the regional policy’s spatial layout. There were adjustments to the spatial layout of the policy as a result of PSDS. The LCRPGR is consistently greater than 1 from 2023 to 2035, reflecting a rational and comfortable urban plan that provides land use to meet population growth and demand.Furthermore, the PSDS introduced reasonable modifications to the regional plan’s spatial configuration. Our research provides robust support for monitoring sustainable urban development and implementing regional policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107893"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145689506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel carbon dynamics assessment framework reveals climate positive land management approaches across North America 新的碳动态评估框架揭示了整个北美对气候有利的土地管理方法
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107890
Kayla Stan , Graham Watt , Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa
Natural climate solutions (NCS) can foster ecosystem resiliency and mitigate climate change. However, a gap exists between carbon cycle science and decision support systems. Bridging this gap can advance climate positive land management and promote the implementation of natural climate solutions. Here, we propose a novel framework to assess carbon dynamics to reveal management approaches for land cover at a 300 m resolution within which natural climate solutions can be more readily identified and applied. We use annual land cover change and model the associated carbon dynamics to categorize the sub-regional ecodistricts of Canada and the USA into the most effective NCS category based on its current change dynamics. Restoration NCS may be a useful strategy in the southern boreal forest, southeastern USA (Eastern Temperate Forest), and western Canadian Cordillera, while Protection NCS should be focused in the Great Plains and the far North. Specifically, we find that 9 % of ecodistricts, and 23 % of land area, would be best managed through protection-based nature climate solutions, while 27 % of ecodistricts, and 26 % of land area, should be managed using restoration climate solutions. This transferable framework can be used to target the sub-regional implementation of different NCS strategies based on local-level land cover changes and carbon dynamics.
自然气候解决方案(NCS)可以增强生态系统的恢复能力,减缓气候变化。然而,碳循环科学与决策支持系统之间存在差距。弥合这一差距可以推进对气候有利的土地管理,并促进实施自然气候解决方案。在这里,我们提出了一个新的框架来评估碳动态,以揭示300 m分辨率下土地覆盖的管理方法,在该框架下,自然气候解决方案可以更容易地识别和应用。我们使用年度土地覆盖变化和相关的碳动态模型,根据其当前的变化动态将加拿大和美国的次区域生态区划分为最有效的NCS类别。在南方北方森林、美国东南部(东温带森林)和加拿大西部科迪勒拉地区,恢复性NCS可能是一个有用的策略,而保护性NCS应该集中在大平原和远北地区。具体来说,我们发现9 %的生态区和23 %的土地面积最好通过基于保护的自然气候解决方案来管理,而27 %的生态区和26 %的土地面积应该通过恢复气候解决方案来管理。这一可转移框架可用于针对基于地方一级土地覆盖变化和碳动态的不同NCS战略的分区域实施。
{"title":"Novel carbon dynamics assessment framework reveals climate positive land management approaches across North America","authors":"Kayla Stan ,&nbsp;Graham Watt ,&nbsp;Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107890","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107890","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural climate solutions (NCS) can foster ecosystem resiliency and mitigate climate change. However, a gap exists between carbon cycle science and decision support systems. Bridging this gap can advance climate positive land management and promote the implementation of natural climate solutions. Here, we propose a novel framework to assess carbon dynamics to reveal management approaches for land cover at a 300 m resolution within which natural climate solutions can be more readily identified and applied. We use annual land cover change and model the associated carbon dynamics to categorize the sub-regional ecodistricts of Canada and the USA into the most effective NCS category based on its current change dynamics. Restoration NCS may be a useful strategy in the southern boreal forest, southeastern USA (Eastern Temperate Forest), and western Canadian Cordillera, while Protection NCS should be focused in the Great Plains and the far North. Specifically, we find that 9 % of ecodistricts, and 23 % of land area, would be best managed through protection-based nature climate solutions, while 27 % of ecodistricts, and 26 % of land area, should be managed using restoration climate solutions. This transferable framework can be used to target the sub-regional implementation of different NCS strategies based on local-level land cover changes and carbon dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107890"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145689242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implicit and explicit (in)justice on the route to Paris: An analysis of justice expressions in the Paris Agreement, EU-, and Swedish climate-forest policy mixes 通往巴黎的道路上隐含的和明确的正义:对《巴黎协定》、欧盟和瑞典气候森林政策组合中正义表达的分析
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107888
Auvikki de Boon , Johanna Johansson
Forests are central to climate change mitigation, and there is consensus that climate transition efforts must be just. However, the “just transition” concept often functions as a boundary object, leading to ambiguity in its implementation. Statements of commitment to just transitions therefore require scrutiny as to what a just transition is meant to entail, what kind of justice transition policies seek to ensure, and how these ambitions are envisioned to be realised in practice. Yet, it is precisely this that is missing in the current academic literature, especially in the forest sector context. This study addresses this gap by analysing implicit and explicit justice expressions in the Paris Agreement, and EU- and Swedish climate-forest policy mixes, thereby providing empirical insights on the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of just transitions in the forest sector. Using a newly developed framework that combines the policy mix concept with distributional, recognitional, and procedural justice dimensions, the analysis reveals shared narrow foci in just transition understanding, discrepancies between expressed just transition motivations, and inconsistent mechanisms for implementation across governance levels, thus risking stakeholder disengagement. The results call for explicit discussions in policy debate on how justice can be ensured in transition efforts in the forest sector across levels, regardless of the specific understanding of justice that is adhered to, and open societal debate on what a just transition ultimately ought to mean in a forest context. Furthermore, policy makers must take the step from ambiguous promises to concrete instruments to support forest stakeholders through the transition.
森林是减缓气候变化的核心,人们一致认为,气候转型的努力必须公正。然而,“正当过渡”概念往往作为一个边界对象,导致其实施的模糊性。因此,承诺公正过渡的声明需要仔细审查:公正过渡意味着什么,过渡政策寻求确保什么样的正义,以及如何设想在实践中实现这些雄心壮志。然而,在目前的学术文献中,特别是在森林部门的背景下,正是缺乏这一点。本研究通过分析《巴黎协定》中隐含和明确的正义表述,以及欧盟和瑞典的气候-森林混合政策,解决了这一差距,从而就森林部门的“什么”和“如何”公正转型提供了实证见解。该分析使用了一个新开发的框架,该框架将政策混合概念与分配、认可和程序正义维度相结合,揭示了对公正转型理解的共同狭隘焦点,表达的公正转型动机之间的差异,以及跨治理级别实施机制的不一致,从而有可能导致利益相关者脱离参与。结果要求在政策辩论中明确讨论如何在各级森林部门的转型努力中确保正义,而不管所坚持的对正义的具体理解如何,并要求公开的社会辩论关于在森林环境中公正的转型最终应该意味着什么。此外,政策制定者必须从模棱两可的承诺转变为具体的工具,以支持森林利益相关者完成过渡。
{"title":"Implicit and explicit (in)justice on the route to Paris: An analysis of justice expressions in the Paris Agreement, EU-, and Swedish climate-forest policy mixes","authors":"Auvikki de Boon ,&nbsp;Johanna Johansson","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107888","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107888","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests are central to climate change mitigation, and there is consensus that climate transition efforts must be just. However, the “just transition” concept often functions as a boundary object, leading to ambiguity in its implementation. Statements of commitment to just transitions therefore require scrutiny as to what a just transition is meant to entail, what kind of justice transition policies seek to ensure, and how these ambitions are envisioned to be realised in practice. Yet, it is precisely this that is missing in the current academic literature, especially in the forest sector context. This study addresses this gap by analysing implicit and explicit justice expressions in the Paris Agreement, and EU- and Swedish climate-forest policy mixes, thereby providing empirical insights on the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of just transitions in the forest sector. Using a newly developed framework that combines the policy mix concept with distributional, recognitional, and procedural justice dimensions, the analysis reveals shared narrow foci in just transition understanding, discrepancies between expressed just transition motivations, and inconsistent mechanisms for implementation across governance levels, thus risking stakeholder disengagement. The results call for explicit discussions in policy debate on how justice can be ensured in transition efforts in the forest sector across levels, regardless of the specific understanding of justice that is adhered to, and open societal debate on what a just transition ultimately ought to mean in a forest context. Furthermore, policy makers must take the step from ambiguous promises to concrete instruments to support forest stakeholders through the transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107888"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145693106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The new perspective of future multi-scenario analysis: Decoding impact pathways of land use dynamics on sustainable development goals 未来多情景分析的新视角:解读土地利用动态对可持续发展目标的影响路径
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107892
Hongjiao Qu , Weiyin Wang , Chen-Chieh Feng , Luo Guo
Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is often challenged by escalating land use conflicts and climate change. Existing research has overlooked the mediating effects of climatic factors and the nonlinear relationships between land use changes and SDGs, leading to gaps in understanding the synergistic mechanisms of these interactions. This study incorporates key climatic variables into a time-series forecasting framework for SDGs using a transformer-based model, with the goal to systematically revealing the relationships between land use dynamics and SDGs in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB), as well as the impact mechanisms of different land use structures on SDGs. Predictions based on the Transformer model indicate that the spatial distribution of SDGs exhibits persistent heterogeneity in YREB in 2030. Land use dynamic changes exert nonlinear impacts on SDGs under different scenarios. The strongest nonlinear relationship is observed under the Sustainable Development scenario (Pnon–linear = 0.0003, Poverall < 0.001). The impact of built-up land on SDGs exhibits varying effects under different scenarios: 0.649 (p < 0.001) in the Economic Priority scenario; −0.702 (p < 0.001) and −0.549 (p < 0.001) in the Natural Development and Farmland Protection scenarios, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for forecasting SDGs incorporating the influence of climatic variables, emphasizing the need to formulate scenario-specific policies to achieve synergies between land use change and SDGs against the backdrop of climate change.
实现可持续发展目标经常受到不断升级的土地使用冲突和气候变化的挑战。现有研究忽略了气候因子的中介作用以及土地利用变化与可持续发展目标之间的非线性关系,导致对这些相互作用的协同机制的理解存在空白。本研究采用基于变压器的模型,将关键气候变量纳入可持续发展目标时间序列预测框架,系统揭示长江经济带土地利用动态与可持续发展目标的关系,以及不同土地利用结构对可持续发展目标的影响机制。基于Transformer模型的预测表明,2030年可持续发展目标的空间分布呈现出持续的异质性。不同情景下土地利用动态变化对可持续发展目标产生非线性影响。在可持续发展情景下,观察到最强的非线性关系(p非线性= 0.0003,powall < 0.001)。建设用地对可持续发展目标的影响在不同情景下表现出不同的效应:经济优先情景下为0.649 (p <; 0.001);- 0.702 (p <; 0.001)和- 0.549 (p <; 0.001)。本研究展示了一个包含气候变量影响的可持续发展目标预测框架,强调需要制定针对具体场景的政策,以实现气候变化背景下土地利用变化与可持续发展目标之间的协同效应。
{"title":"The new perspective of future multi-scenario analysis: Decoding impact pathways of land use dynamics on sustainable development goals","authors":"Hongjiao Qu ,&nbsp;Weiyin Wang ,&nbsp;Chen-Chieh Feng ,&nbsp;Luo Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107892","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107892","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is often challenged by escalating land use conflicts and climate change. Existing research has overlooked the mediating effects of climatic factors and the nonlinear relationships between land use changes and SDGs, leading to gaps in understanding the synergistic mechanisms of these interactions. This study incorporates key climatic variables into a time-series forecasting framework for SDGs using a transformer-based model, with the goal to systematically revealing the relationships between land use dynamics and SDGs in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB), as well as the impact mechanisms of different land use structures on SDGs. Predictions based on the Transformer model indicate that the spatial distribution of SDGs exhibits persistent heterogeneity in YREB in 2030. Land use dynamic changes exert nonlinear impacts on SDGs under different scenarios. The strongest nonlinear relationship is observed under the Sustainable Development scenario (P<sub>non–linear</sub> = 0.0003, P<sub>overall</sub> &lt; 0.001). The impact of built-up land on SDGs exhibits varying effects under different scenarios: 0.649 (p &lt; 0.001) in the Economic Priority scenario; −0.702 (p &lt; 0.001) and −0.549 (p &lt; 0.001) in the Natural Development and Farmland Protection scenarios, respectively. This study demonstrates a framework for forecasting SDGs incorporating the influence of climatic variables, emphasizing the need to formulate scenario-specific policies to achieve synergies between land use change and SDGs against the backdrop of climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107892"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145657190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Urban climate adaptation planning in Windhoek, Namibia: Gaps, challenges, and opportunities for Nature based Solutions 纳米比亚温得和克城市气候适应规划:基于自然的解决方案的差距、挑战和机遇
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107877
B. Hansen Gaby , A. Breed Christina
Nature based Solutions (NbS) for urban climate adaptation remain underexplored in arid Sub-Saharan African (SSA) cities such as Windhoek, Namibia. This study investigates how national climate adaptation policies translate into local action, identifying gaps, challenges, and opportunities for embedding NbS in urban planning. A qualitative case study combined a review of policy documents with semi-structured stakeholder interviews. Findings reveal that while national policies and the Windhoek Integrated Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (WICCSAP) set ambitious goals, they lack contextually derived measures and practical NbS targets, such as community-driven resilience or integrated locally tailored dryland strategies, or ecosystem-based water management, leaving the city reliant on grey infrastructure and short-term disaster risk responses. This omission exacerbates urban heat islands, flood risks, and constrains socio-ecological resilience. At the same time, both community-driven practices and municipal champions illustrate alternative pathways. Such initiatives signal early steps toward transformative adaptation where long-term systemic shifts in governance and practice are required. Locally grounded initiatives, including permaculture dryland gardens, rainfall monitoring, and the “Brown is Beautiful” campaign, demonstrate how culturally resonant NbS can integrate water conservation, ecological design, and social cohesion in Windhoek’s deprived, arid context. Within the municipality, individual planners and officials also advocate for NbS, seeking to move beyond grey solutions despite institutional barriers. Realising these opportunities requires capacity building, cross-sectoral coordination, and partnerships to institutionalise NbS in urban governance. The study makes two key contributions: first, it identifies the systemic neglect of NbS in Windhoek and Namibia’s climate policy frameworks; second, it highlights both bottom-up innovations and emerging top-down drivers that can bridge the policy implementation gap. Windhoek’s experience could offer transferable lessons for other rapidly urbanising, water-scarce cities across Sub-Saharan Africa.
在纳米比亚温得和克等干旱的撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)城市,基于自然的城市气候适应解决方案(NbS)仍未得到充分探索。本研究探讨了国家气候适应政策如何转化为地方行动,确定了将国家气候适应政策纳入城市规划的差距、挑战和机遇。定性案例研究结合了对政策文件的审查和半结构化的利益相关者访谈。研究结果表明,虽然国家政策和温得和克综合气候变化战略和行动计划(WICCSAP)设定了雄心勃勃的目标,但它们缺乏基于具体情况的措施和实际的国家气候变化目标,如社区驱动的恢复力或当地定制的综合旱地战略,或基于生态系统的水资源管理,使城市依赖于灰色基础设施和短期灾害风险应对。这一疏忽加剧了城市热岛、洪水风险,并限制了社会生态恢复能力。与此同时,社区驱动的实践和市政倡导者都说明了另一种途径。这些举措标志着需要在治理和实践方面进行长期系统性转变的变革适应的早期步骤。在当地开展的活动,包括旱地花园永续栽培、降雨监测和“棕色是美丽的”活动,展示了在温得和克贫瘠干旱的环境中,具有文化共鸣的国家银行如何将水资源保护、生态设计和社会凝聚力结合起来。在北京市内部,个别规划者和官员也在倡导国家统计局,尽管存在制度障碍,但他们试图超越灰色解决方案。实现这些机遇需要能力建设、跨部门协调和伙伴关系,使国家统计局在城市治理中制度化。该研究做出了两个关键贡献:首先,它确定了温得和克和纳米比亚气候政策框架对国家统计局的系统性忽视;其次,它强调了自下而上的创新和新兴的自上而下的驱动因素,可以弥合政策执行的差距。温得和克的经验可以为撒哈拉以南非洲其他快速城市化、缺水的城市提供可借鉴的经验。
{"title":"Urban climate adaptation planning in Windhoek, Namibia: Gaps, challenges, and opportunities for Nature based Solutions","authors":"B. Hansen Gaby ,&nbsp;A. Breed Christina","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107877","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107877","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature based Solutions (NbS) for urban climate adaptation remain underexplored in arid Sub-Saharan African (SSA) cities such as Windhoek, Namibia. This study investigates how national climate adaptation policies translate into local action, identifying gaps, challenges, and opportunities for embedding NbS in urban planning. A qualitative case study combined a review of policy documents with semi-structured stakeholder interviews. Findings reveal that while national policies and the Windhoek Integrated Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (WICCSAP) set ambitious goals, they lack contextually derived measures and practical NbS targets, such as community-driven resilience or integrated locally tailored dryland strategies, or ecosystem-based water management, leaving the city reliant on grey infrastructure and short-term disaster risk responses. This omission exacerbates urban heat islands, flood risks, and constrains socio-ecological resilience. At the same time, both community-driven practices and municipal champions illustrate alternative pathways. Such initiatives signal early steps toward transformative adaptation where long-term systemic shifts in governance and practice are required. Locally grounded initiatives, including permaculture dryland gardens, rainfall monitoring, and the “Brown is Beautiful” campaign, demonstrate how culturally resonant NbS can integrate water conservation, ecological design, and social cohesion in Windhoek’s deprived, arid context. Within the municipality, individual planners and officials also advocate for NbS, seeking to move beyond grey solutions despite institutional barriers. Realising these opportunities requires capacity building, cross-sectoral coordination, and partnerships to institutionalise NbS in urban governance. The study makes two key contributions: first, it identifies the systemic neglect of NbS in Windhoek and Namibia’s climate policy frameworks; second, it highlights both bottom-up innovations and emerging top-down drivers that can bridge the policy implementation gap. Windhoek’s experience could offer transferable lessons for other rapidly urbanising, water-scarce cities across Sub-Saharan Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107877"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145658872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pan-ontological institutional bricolage? The urgent need for a dialogue between state and customary authorities in Namibian conservancies 泛本体论的制度拼贴?迫切需要在纳米比亚保护区内的国家和习惯当局之间进行对话
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107887
Sakeus Kadhikwa , Michael Bollig , Stéphanie Eileen Domptail
Following independence, several southern African states established modern institutions in communal areas to manage human-wildlife relations and land tenure. These reforms were layered over existing customary governance systems, creating overlapping jurisdiction and contested authority. This study analyzes how such institutional arrangements produce governance conflicts within Namibia’s communal conservancies, where management committees and communal land boards have been introduced to manage wildlife and land in territories still under traditional authorities. The study presents evidence of institutional interactions, land use patterns, and the distribution of conservancy benefits which were obtained during field work in 2023 and 2024. We (1) collected qualitative data through interviews with conservancies stakeholders, management committees, and members of supporting institutions; (2) facilitated participatory mapping at both conservancy and village levels; and (3) reviewed regional databases of customary land rights and conservancy records. Findings reveal a form of institutional bricolage characterized by discordant institutional multiplicity shaped by competing values and logics. This produces conflicts in three domains: (1) land use and zoning, (2) management and distribution of conservancy revenues, and (3) shifting values and principles of communal land rights allocation. Conflicts emerge when governance decisions only follow the norms and values of modern systems while marginalizing customary values. Excluding traditional authorities from governance processes such as corridor planning, community conceptualization, and land allocation provokes resistance in defense of their values and legitimacy. We conclude that effective land-use governance in communal settings requires policy frameworks that recognize and integrate the values of both governance systems alike, rather than promoting the dominance of one over the other.
独立后,几个南部非洲国家在公共地区建立了现代制度,以管理人类与野生动物的关系和土地所有权。这些改革是在现有的习惯治理体系之上分层进行的,造成了重叠的管辖权和有争议的权力。这项研究分析了这种制度安排是如何在纳米比亚的公共保护区内产生治理冲突的,在纳米比亚,管理委员会和公共土地委员会已经被引入,以管理仍然在传统当局管辖下的领土上的野生动物和土地。以2023年和2024年为研究对象,提供了制度互动、土地利用模式和水利效益分配的证据。我们(1)通过对保护协会利益相关者、管理委员会和支持机构成员的访谈收集了定性数据;(2)促进保护区和村级的参与式测绘;(3)查阅了地区习惯法土地权利和水利记录数据库。研究结果揭示了一种制度拼凑的形式,其特征是由竞争的价值观和逻辑形成的不协调的制度多样性。这在三个领域产生了冲突:(1)土地使用和分区,(2)管理和分配保护收入,以及(3)公共土地权利分配的价值和原则的变化。当治理决策只遵循现代制度的规范和价值观,而将习惯价值观边缘化时,就会出现冲突。将传统权威排除在走廊规划、社区概念化和土地分配等治理过程之外,会引发捍卫其价值观和合法性的阻力。我们的结论是,在公共环境中,有效的土地使用治理需要政策框架,承认并整合两种治理体系的价值,而不是促进一种对另一种的主导地位。
{"title":"Pan-ontological institutional bricolage? The urgent need for a dialogue between state and customary authorities in Namibian conservancies","authors":"Sakeus Kadhikwa ,&nbsp;Michael Bollig ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Eileen Domptail","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107887","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107887","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Following independence, several southern African states established modern institutions in communal areas to manage human-wildlife relations and land tenure. These reforms were layered over existing customary governance systems, creating overlapping jurisdiction and contested authority. This study analyzes how such institutional arrangements produce governance conflicts within Namibia’s communal conservancies, where management committees and communal land boards have been introduced to manage wildlife and land in territories still under traditional authorities. The study presents evidence of institutional interactions, land use patterns, and the distribution of conservancy benefits which were obtained during field work in 2023 and 2024. We (1) collected qualitative data through interviews with conservancies stakeholders, management committees, and members of supporting institutions; (2) facilitated participatory mapping at both conservancy and village levels; and (3) reviewed regional databases of customary land rights and conservancy records. Findings reveal a form of institutional bricolage characterized by discordant institutional multiplicity shaped by competing values and logics. This produces conflicts in three domains: (1) land use and zoning, (2) management and distribution of conservancy revenues, and (3) shifting values and principles of communal land rights allocation. Conflicts emerge when governance decisions only follow the norms and values of modern systems while marginalizing customary values. Excluding traditional authorities from governance processes such as corridor planning, community conceptualization, and land allocation provokes resistance in defense of their values and legitimacy. We conclude that effective land-use governance in communal settings requires policy frameworks that recognize and integrate the values of both governance systems alike, rather than promoting the dominance of one over the other.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 107887"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145651565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Governance as a determinant of land use decisions in strategic basins of the Colombian Andes 治理是哥伦比亚安第斯山脉战略盆地土地利用决策的决定因素
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107889
Luisa Díez-Echavarría , Clara Villegas-Palacio , Santiago Arango-Aramburo
One of the relevant underlying drivers of land use and cover (LUC) allocation decisions is governance. It, however, is often equated solely with the government and its formal policies, neglecting the role that other actors and regulations play in it. To address this gap, this study aims to examine the impact of the governance structure on farmers’ LUC decisions, particularly in the basin of the Grande and Chico rivers in Colombia. To that end, governance is conceptualized based on three functions that are part of adaptive co-management. For data collection, we administered a questionnaire to 73 farmers. In addition, we estimated a Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) model, with variables representing the characteristics of farmers and the governance system. According to the results, variables associated with all three functions have an impact on decision-making, with the actors and institutions promoting production projects having the greatest influence and favoring pasture. Using the model proposed in this study, we recommend exploring the LUC trajectories that result from different configurations of the governance structure.
土地利用和覆盖(LUC)分配决策的相关潜在驱动因素之一是治理。然而,它常常被仅仅等同于政府及其正式政策,而忽视了其他行为者和法规在其中所起的作用。为了解决这一差距,本研究旨在研究治理结构对农民的土地利用委员会决策的影响,特别是在哥伦比亚的格兰德河和奇科河流域。为此,治理是基于自适应协同管理的三个功能进行概念化的。为了收集数据,我们对73名农民进行了问卷调查。此外,我们估计了一个看似不相关回归(SUR)模型,其中变量代表农民和治理系统的特征。结果表明,与这三个功能相关的变量对决策都有影响,其中促进生产项目的行为者和机构的影响最大,有利于牧场。使用本研究中提出的模型,我们建议探索由不同治理结构配置导致的LUC轨迹。
{"title":"Governance as a determinant of land use decisions in strategic basins of the Colombian Andes","authors":"Luisa Díez-Echavarría ,&nbsp;Clara Villegas-Palacio ,&nbsp;Santiago Arango-Aramburo","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One of the relevant underlying drivers of land use and cover (LUC) allocation decisions is governance. It, however, is often equated solely with the government and its formal policies, neglecting the role that other actors and regulations play in it. To address this gap, this study aims to examine the impact of the governance structure on farmers’ LUC decisions, particularly in the basin of the Grande and Chico rivers in Colombia. To that end, governance is conceptualized based on three functions that are part of adaptive co-management. For data collection, we administered a questionnaire to 73 farmers. In addition, we estimated a Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) model, with variables representing the characteristics of farmers and the governance system. According to the results, variables associated with all three functions have an impact on decision-making, with the actors and institutions promoting production projects having the greatest influence and favoring pasture. Using the model proposed in this study, we recommend exploring the LUC trajectories that result from different configurations of the governance structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 107889"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145657191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Residents’ preference for sustainable habitats through choice experiments using 3D visualisations: Evidence from Rural Western Sichuan, China 通过三维可视化选择实验研究居民对可持续栖息地的偏好:来自中国四川西部农村的证据
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107881
Zhuo Li , QiuShan Li , Ishikawa Mikiko , Bo Zhao
The implementation of China’s rural revitalization strategy has significantly improved rural living standards, yet it has also accelerated the spread of standardized modern housing models that risk eroding the ecological adaptability and cultural distinctiveness of traditional settlements. This situation reflects a broader land use policy dilemma: how to reconcile the preservation of vernacular landscapes, the pursuit of ecological performance, and the realities of household affordability in the context of rapid socio-environmental change. Addressing this dilemma is critical for designing rural habitats that are not only climate-resilient but also socially and culturally acceptable. In this study, we use a discrete choice experiment to quantify residents’ preferences for key housing and vegetation attributes in vernacular settlements in western rural area. Based on 202 household surveys, we find that residents are willing to pay more for glazed tile roofs and high vegetation coverage, while rejecting traditional wall finishes with poor thermal performance. Preferences are shaped by a combination of functional concerns, cultural identity, economic constraints, and demographic factors such as ageing populations. These findings reveal how behavioral trade-offs shape housing choices and provide evidence for embedding resident-informed decision-making into rural housing programmes and land use policy design.
中国乡村振兴战略的实施显著提高了农村的生活水平,但也加速了标准化现代住房模式的传播,这有可能侵蚀传统聚落的生态适应性和文化独特性。这种情况反映了一个更广泛的土地使用政策困境:如何在快速社会环境变化的背景下协调乡土景观的保护、对生态性能的追求和家庭负担能力的现实。解决这一困境对于设计不仅具有气候适应性,而且具有社会和文化可接受性的农村栖息地至关重要。在本研究中,我们采用离散选择实验来量化西部农村民居居民对关键住房和植被属性的偏好。通过对202户家庭的调查,我们发现居民愿意为琉璃瓦屋顶和高植被覆盖率支付更多的费用,同时拒绝传统的热工性能差的墙面饰面。偏好是由功能考虑、文化认同、经济约束和人口老龄化等人口因素共同决定的。这些发现揭示了行为权衡如何影响住房选择,并为将居民知情的决策纳入农村住房计划和土地使用政策设计提供了证据。
{"title":"Residents’ preference for sustainable habitats through choice experiments using 3D visualisations: Evidence from Rural Western Sichuan, China","authors":"Zhuo Li ,&nbsp;QiuShan Li ,&nbsp;Ishikawa Mikiko ,&nbsp;Bo Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107881","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107881","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The implementation of China’s rural revitalization strategy has significantly improved rural living standards, yet it has also accelerated the spread of standardized modern housing models that risk eroding the ecological adaptability and cultural distinctiveness of traditional settlements. This situation reflects a broader land use policy dilemma: how to reconcile the preservation of vernacular landscapes, the pursuit of ecological performance, and the realities of household affordability in the context of rapid socio-environmental change. Addressing this dilemma is critical for designing rural habitats that are not only climate-resilient but also socially and culturally acceptable. In this study, we use a discrete choice experiment to quantify residents’ preferences for key housing and vegetation attributes in vernacular settlements in western rural area. Based on 202 household surveys, we find that residents are willing to pay more for glazed tile roofs and high vegetation coverage, while rejecting traditional wall finishes with poor thermal performance. Preferences are shaped by a combination of functional concerns, cultural identity, economic constraints, and demographic factors such as ageing populations. These findings reveal how behavioral trade-offs shape housing choices and provide evidence for embedding resident-informed decision-making into rural housing programmes and land use policy design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 107881"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145690956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Why don't landowners just do what they are told?”: Potential mismatches of values and objectives between family forest landowners and professionals “为什么土地所有者不按要求去做呢?”“:家庭森林土地所有者和专业人员之间的价值观和目标可能不匹配
IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107883
Jesse Caputo , Zhao Ma , Stephanie A. Snyder
An often-heard complaint in the forestry and forest conservation fields is that private forest landowners – especially individuals and families – do not implement the recommended practices of forestry and conservation specialists or experts. Furthermore, it is commonly assumed that this disregard stems from a lack of information and knowledge regarding the "correct" and approved practices. Consequently, attempts to address the situation have historically been predicated on a knowledge transfer model. In this viewpoint commentary, we offer the perspective – informed by self-determination theory – that family forest ownerships (FFOs) may not follow the advice of experts – not because of lack of knowledge or awareness – but because their values, objectives, and needs may not always align with the assumed objectives underlying experts' recommendations. In other words, they may disregard the experts because in many cases this disregard is reasonable. We offer future researchers two specific propositions as to where this may be the case: Proposition 1, that landowners' preferences and priorities may be different from what are assumed by experts; and Proposition 2, that forests provide disservices as well as services to landowners and these are not always fully appreciated by experts.
在林业和森林养护领域经常听到的抱怨是,私人森林土地所有者- -特别是个人和家庭- -不执行林业和养护专家或专家建议的做法。此外,通常认为这种忽视源于缺乏关于“正确的”和认可的实践的信息和知识。因此,解决这种情况的尝试历来都是以知识转移模型为基础的。在这篇观点评论中,我们提出了基于自决理论的观点,即家庭森林所有者可能不会遵循专家的建议——不是因为缺乏知识或意识——而是因为他们的价值观、目标和需求可能并不总是与专家建议所依据的假设目标一致。换句话说,他们可能无视专家的意见,因为在很多情况下,这种无视是合理的。我们为未来的研究人员提供了两个具体的命题:命题1,土地所有者的偏好和优先事项可能不同于专家的假设;和提案2,即森林对土地所有者既提供服务又提供损害,专家们并不总是充分认识到这一点。
{"title":"“Why don't landowners just do what they are told?”: Potential mismatches of values and objectives between family forest landowners and professionals","authors":"Jesse Caputo ,&nbsp;Zhao Ma ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Snyder","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107883","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107883","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An often-heard complaint in the forestry and forest conservation fields is that private forest landowners – especially individuals and families – do not implement the recommended practices of forestry and conservation specialists or experts. Furthermore, it is commonly assumed that this disregard stems from a lack of information and knowledge regarding the \"correct\" and approved practices. Consequently, attempts to address the situation have historically been predicated on a knowledge transfer model. In this viewpoint commentary, we offer the perspective – informed by self-determination theory – that family forest ownerships (FFOs) may not follow the advice of experts – not because of lack of knowledge or awareness – but because their values, objectives, and needs may not always align with the assumed objectives underlying experts' recommendations. In other words, they may disregard the experts because in many cases this disregard is <em>reasonable</em>. We offer future researchers two specific propositions as to where this may be the case: Proposition 1, that landowners' preferences and priorities may be different from what are assumed by experts; and Proposition 2, that forests provide disservices as well as services to landowners and these are not always fully appreciated by experts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 107883"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145657192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Land Use Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1