Delayed biodiversity responses to environmental changes occur from genes over communities to ecosystem functions. Despite growing insights into the mechanisms governing both the magnitude and time lags of biodiversity responses at individual levels of biodiversity, how interactions among levels of biodiversity affect ecosystem‐wide inertia in response to an environmental forcing event remains a largely unanswered question. As several sources causing time lags interact within and across multiple biodiversity levels, we hypothesise these mechanisms control how time lags at one biodiversity level may cascade into increasingly extended lags at higher biodiversity levels. We analysed empirical data on genetic diversity, species distributions, community diversity and functional diversity in semi‐natural grassland patches for the existence and length of lagged responses across biodiversity levels in response to 165 years of land‐use change. Time lags were present at all tested biodiversity levels (from genes to traits), none yet in equilibrium with the current landscape. Significant variation in delays among individual species possibly controlled by delayed loss in genetic diversity may affect the scale of future biodiversity losses at the community level. Functional diversity appeared to have the most delayed response, likely due to high functional redundancy in species‐rich grassland communities. Synthesis . Species identity seems central in governing the observed delays at each level of biodiversity, from genetic to functional diversity. In particular, species identity controls the slowest responses at the genetic level, potentially leading to accumulating underestimations of the size and duration of time lags at species, community and functional diversity levels compared to average community responses. Conservation and restoration actions must therefore anticipate the potentially systematic underestimation of time lags in biodiversity responses following habitat change to ensure their effectiveness in halting biodiversity loss.
{"title":"Accumulating time lags across biodiversity levels following land‐use change","authors":"Jan Plue, Franz Essl, Sara A. O. Cousins","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70203","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item> Delayed biodiversity responses to environmental changes occur from genes over communities to ecosystem functions. Despite growing insights into the mechanisms governing both the magnitude and time lags of biodiversity responses at individual levels of biodiversity, how interactions among levels of biodiversity affect ecosystem‐wide inertia in response to an environmental forcing event remains a largely unanswered question. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> As several sources causing time lags interact within and across multiple biodiversity levels, we hypothesise these mechanisms control how time lags at one biodiversity level may cascade into increasingly extended lags at higher biodiversity levels. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> We analysed empirical data on genetic diversity, species distributions, community diversity and functional diversity in semi‐natural grassland patches for the existence and length of lagged responses across biodiversity levels in response to 165 years of land‐use change. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> Time lags were present at all tested biodiversity levels (from genes to traits), none yet in equilibrium with the current landscape. Significant variation in delays among individual species possibly controlled by delayed loss in genetic diversity may affect the scale of future biodiversity losses at the community level. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> Functional diversity appeared to have the most delayed response, likely due to high functional redundancy in species‐rich grassland communities. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic> . Species identity seems central in governing the observed delays at each level of biodiversity, from genetic to functional diversity. In particular, species identity controls the slowest responses at the genetic level, potentially leading to accumulating underestimations of the size and duration of time lags at species, community and functional diversity levels compared to average community responses. Conservation and restoration actions must therefore anticipate the potentially systematic underestimation of time lags in biodiversity responses following habitat change to ensure their effectiveness in halting biodiversity loss. </jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"185 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145567419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding the relationship between biological diversity and ecosystem productivity is a central challenge in ecology. Structural diversity—the variation in size, height, and spatial arrangement of individuals within communities—has been proposed as a key driver of productivity, yet previous studies have reported mixed results, leaving its role in ecosystem functioning unclear. Clarifying the structural diversity and productivity relationship (SDPR) is essential not only for advancing ecological theory but also for informing biodiversity conservation, resource management, and climate adaptation strategies across ecosystems. Here, we utilized the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) database, encompassing 95,602 trees within 3307 plots throughout most types of forest ecosystems in the contiguous U.S. We investigated the variation of SDPR by analyzing the growth of existing trees under the interactive effects of structural diversity with basal area, stand age, and annual precipitation with other factors. We also compiled the studies of SDPR published during 1974–2022 and compared the mean annual precipitation between studies showing the negative and positive SDPR. We found that: (1) SDPR was negative under the low range of structural diversity, but became positive under the high range; (2) SDPR was more positive with greater basal areas; (3) SDPR was more positive with stand development, and (4) SDPR was more positive with greater annual precipitation in the range of low structural diversity but switched to be more negative in the high range, and the negative SDPR with greater precipitation aligns with the analysis of published studies showing greater precipitation in studies with negative SDPR than the positive ones. Synthesis . Our findings reveal that structural diversity plays a context‐dependent role in regulating ecosystem productivity, shaped by interactions with stand structure and climate. This study offers broad implications for understanding ecosystem functioning, particularly how biodiversity interacts with environmental and structural attributes to shape productivity under global change.
{"title":"Structural diversity shifts from negative to positive associations with forest productivity via basal area, stand age, and precipitation thresholds","authors":"Kyungrok Hwang, Lu Zhai","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70200","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item> Understanding the relationship between biological diversity and ecosystem productivity is a central challenge in ecology. Structural diversity—the variation in size, height, and spatial arrangement of individuals within communities—has been proposed as a key driver of productivity, yet previous studies have reported mixed results, leaving its role in ecosystem functioning unclear. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> Clarifying the structural diversity and productivity relationship (SDPR) is essential not only for advancing ecological theory but also for informing biodiversity conservation, resource management, and climate adaptation strategies across ecosystems. Here, we utilized the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) database, encompassing 95,602 trees within 3307 plots throughout most types of forest ecosystems in the contiguous U.S. We investigated the variation of SDPR by analyzing the growth of existing trees under the interactive effects of structural diversity with basal area, stand age, and annual precipitation with other factors. We also compiled the studies of SDPR published during 1974–2022 and compared the mean annual precipitation between studies showing the negative and positive SDPR. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> We found that: (1) SDPR was negative under the low range of structural diversity, but became positive under the high range; (2) SDPR was more positive with greater basal areas; (3) SDPR was more positive with stand development, and (4) SDPR was more positive with greater annual precipitation in the range of low structural diversity but switched to be more negative in the high range, and the negative SDPR with greater precipitation aligns with the analysis of published studies showing greater precipitation in studies with negative SDPR than the positive ones. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic> . Our findings reveal that structural diversity plays a context‐dependent role in regulating ecosystem productivity, shaped by interactions with stand structure and climate. This study offers broad implications for understanding ecosystem functioning, particularly how biodiversity interacts with environmental and structural attributes to shape productivity under global change. </jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145559484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Grégoire T. Freschet, Janna Wambsganss, Vincent Poirier, Raoul Huys
Globally, the constrained stoichiometry of living organisms is responsible for the coupling of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) elements in living organic matter, with afterlife effects in dead organic matter. This coupling has long been thought to foster trade‐offs among several key functions of ecosystems, such as soil fertility and C sequestration. However, while there is evidence for a general coupling of C and N cycling in ecosystems, there are many ways in which these cycles also diverge, both temporally and spatially, under the influence of multiple biotic and abiotic drivers. Here, focusing on the role of plant residues in feeding and steering the C and N cycles in soil, we examine how 24 leaf and root litters with contrasting chemistry differentially influence the temporal release of compounds with varying C:N stoichiometry to soil, and how C and N elements end up as stabilized (mineral‐associated organic matter, MAOM) or more bioavailable organic (particulate organic matter, POM) or mineral forms (e.g. CO 2 , NO 3− , NH 4+ ). There were major differences in the C:N stoichiometry of compounds released during decomposition, from low C:N early on to very high C:N at later stages. We observed a trade‐off in the role of litters towards increasing soil N availability (i.e. N in the soil solution) versus soil C stabilization (i.e. C in MAOM). Slow‐decomposing litters (with high lignin and low N concentrations, C‐poor leachates), particularly roots, favoured soil C stabilization over N availability. For each gram of litter decomposed, roots contributed 33% more C to the MAOM fraction of the soil, whereas leaves contributed 87% more N to the soil solution. This pattern was strongly driven (44% of variance explained) by the contrasting biochemistry of leaf versus root litters. Synthesis . These results suggest that leaf and root litters are highly complementary in the way they contribute to soil C stabilization and N availability. As such, global changes that influence the production and turnover of above and below‐ground litter inputs will likely have cascading effects on the balance between these functions. Our results also reveal substantial variation around the trade‐off between soil C stabilization and N availability, suggesting a continuum from ‘underachieving species’ to ‘versatile species’ contributing more to both functions. This opens perspectives for selecting versatile species capable of influencing positively several agro‐ecosystem functions.
{"title":"Plant litter effects on soil carbon stabilization and nitrogen availability: A trade‐off and some versatile species","authors":"Grégoire T. Freschet, Janna Wambsganss, Vincent Poirier, Raoul Huys","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70205","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item> Globally, the constrained stoichiometry of living organisms is responsible for the coupling of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) elements in living organic matter, with afterlife effects in dead organic matter. This coupling has long been thought to foster trade‐offs among several key functions of ecosystems, such as soil fertility and C sequestration. However, while there is evidence for a general coupling of C and N cycling in ecosystems, there are many ways in which these cycles also diverge, both temporally and spatially, under the influence of multiple biotic and abiotic drivers. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> Here, focusing on the role of plant residues in feeding and steering the C and N cycles in soil, we examine how 24 leaf and root litters with contrasting chemistry differentially influence the temporal release of compounds with varying C:N stoichiometry to soil, and how C and N elements end up as stabilized (mineral‐associated organic matter, MAOM) or more bioavailable organic (particulate organic matter, POM) or mineral forms (e.g. CO <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> , NO <jats:sub>3</jats:sub> <jats:sup>−</jats:sup> , NH <jats:sub>4</jats:sub> <jats:sup>+</jats:sup> ). </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> There were major differences in the C:N stoichiometry of compounds released during decomposition, from low C:N early on to very high C:N at later stages. We observed a trade‐off in the role of litters towards increasing soil N availability (i.e. N in the soil solution) versus soil C stabilization (i.e. C in MAOM). Slow‐decomposing litters (with high lignin and low N concentrations, C‐poor leachates), particularly roots, favoured soil C stabilization over N availability. For each gram of litter decomposed, roots contributed 33% more C to the MAOM fraction of the soil, whereas leaves contributed 87% more N to the soil solution. This pattern was strongly driven (44% of variance explained) by the contrasting biochemistry of leaf versus root litters. </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> <jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic> . These results suggest that leaf and root litters are highly complementary in the way they contribute to soil C stabilization and N availability. As such, global changes that influence the production and turnover of above and below‐ground litter inputs will likely have cascading effects on the balance between these functions. Our results also reveal substantial variation around the trade‐off between soil C stabilization and N availability, suggesting a continuum from ‘underachieving species’ to ‘versatile species’ contributing more to both functions. This opens perspectives for selecting versatile species capable of influencing positively several agro‐ecosystem functions. </jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145553994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Foundation species loss alters algal community structure and dynamics at a trailing range edge","authors":"Nathan G. King, Harry Teagle, Stephen J. Hawkins, Dan A. Smale","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70199","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2745.70199","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"113 12","pages":"3858-3872"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2745.70199","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145545467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Convergence and variation in tree growth trends at the aggregate level","authors":"Shumiao Shu, Xiaolu Tang, George Kontsevich, Ruixuan Liu, Yuan Yao, Bo Pang, Xiaodan Wang, Wanze Zhu, Wenzhi Wang, Xiaoxiang Zhao","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70201","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2745.70201","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"113 12","pages":"3845-3857"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145535807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Barbara Meyers, Rodrigue Friaud, Denicia Kassie, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen, Grégoire T. Freschet
(2021年),Pang et al .(2022年)、Pu et al .(2023),如果et al .(2022年)、Suriyagoda et al .(2012)、Tian et al . (2023), flickr et al . (2015), Waddell et al .(2017),赖特Wurzburger and Zhang et al . (2015), (2023), 2023 Zhu et al . (g)特定root lengthSRLm−1Length per unit dry - mass of fine rootsSRL is a合成法的特点by and in RD研发的变化。It the soil勘探潜力reflects for养分和水(cost per unit (mass) Freschet pages, et al ., 2011) . Bakker et al .(2009)、Eissenstat Freschet et al . (2015), et al .(2015)、范Kleunen (Liu and 2024), Ma et al .(2017)、Wurzburger and赖特(Boot et al ., 2015)(1990年)、(Chen et al ., 2014), Clemensson-Lindell and Asp .等人(1995年)、(2022年)、希尔等人(2006)、李等人(2024),Li et al .(2019年)、Lin et al . (2020) Liu et al .(2017)、Lugli et al .(2011)、Ma et al . (2024),Paterson, Seith et al .(1999)等人(1996年)、Wurzburger and赖特(2024),Yang et al . (2015), Zhang et al .(2011)、郑等人(2018年)、邹et al .(2022年)Bakker et al . (2009), et al . (2013), et al .(2015),粉丝Guilbeault-Mayers et al .(2024年)、Haling et al .(2018)、吴昊等人(2008),He et al . (2017), Hill et al . (2006), Jeffery Kothari et al . (2017), et al . (1996), Li et al .(2019年)、Lugli et al .(2011)、(Lyu et al ., 2016), Pang et al .(2022年)、Pu et al . (2023) Suriyagoda et al . (2012),Tang et al. (2023), Waddell et al. (2017), Wang et al. (2006), Wen et al. (2017), Wurzburger et Wright (2015), Zhan et al. (2019), Zhu et al.（2023）新鲜细根的单位体积干质量RTD的变化：are high .价值保守的母亲挂钩to plant growth strategies)会员,low改良are沥of替代策略(Freschet pages, et al ., 2011) Eissenstat Freschet et al . (2015), et al .(2015)、Ge等(2023),Ma et al .(2024年)、Wurzburger and Wright (Ge et al .(2015) 2023),耿雁生et al .(2022年)、李等人(2024),Li et al .(2019年)、Lin et al .(2020)、Liu et al . (2017) Lugli et al .(2011)、Ma et al .(2024年)、Wurzburger and Wright (2024), Yang et al . (2015),郑et al .(2018)、邹et al .(2022年)、Ge等(2023)Guilbeault-Mayers et al . (2024), Jeffery et al . (2017), Li et al .(2019年)、Lugli et al . (2011), Pang et al .(2022年)、Pu et al . (2023), flickr et al . (2015), Waddell et al .(2017),赖特Wurzburger and Zhang et al . (2015), (2023),Zhu等人（2023）菌根菌根定植强度MCI%任何菌根结构定植的细根交叉点的百分比MCI强度通常与真菌和植物之间关系的亲密程度有关。植物对真菌根系的投资对营养获取很重要，因为真菌参与磷的获取和氮的获取。(Freschet pages, et al ., 2011) Eissenstat Frater et al . (2015), et al .(2018)、Tischer et al .(2015)、特纳等人(1993年),魏Wurzburger et al .(2014),和赖特(Bahadur et al . (2015) 2023), Corkidi et al .(2002)、Frater et al .(2018),霍金斯和乔治(2001年)、贾跃亭等人(2004年)、Jiang et al . (2018), Li et al .(2019年)、Li等人(2011)、Lin et al . (2020) Liu et al .(2000)、Lugli et al .(2011)、潘等人(2020)、Tischer et al .(2015)、Wang et al .(2017),伍兹et al .(2018年)Wurzburger and赖特(Xu et al .(2015),至2021年),Yang et al .(2024年)Amijee等人(1993年)、布鲁斯等(1994),et al .(2013)、邓等人(2018年)、Frater et al .(2018)、锣等人(2011)、锣等(2022年)、格雷厄姆和雅培(2000年)、Guilbeault-Mayers et al . (2024), Hao et al .(2008)、科塔里卡希洛托等人(2001),et al .(1996),刘易斯et al . (1994), Li et al .(2019年)、(Liu et al ., 2000)、Lugli et al .(2011)、潘等人(2020),Pena et al .(2011),得以et al .(2023)、Rua et al . (2013)Tang 2023 et al . (Tian)、et al . (2023), Tischer et al . (2015), Wad
{"title":"Soil nutrient availability rather than spatial nutrient heterogeneity shapes the intraspecific response of root architectural, morphological and mycorrhizal traits in Vaccinium myrtillus","authors":"Barbara Meyers, Rodrigue Friaud, Denicia Kassie, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen, Grégoire T. Freschet","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70188","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2745.70188","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"113 12","pages":"3678-3699"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2745.70188","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145531571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
, 2021;Palosse et al., 2024)，但更温暖的条件并不能普遍克服生物招募障碍，如竞争（Liang et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2024）。气候变暖、种子可获得性和生物相互作用导致幼苗招募的结果好坏参半。因此，林木线树木补充对气候变化的响应高度依赖于当地微点、物种特征和历史干扰。这种复杂性促使人们呼吁进行多因素实验和跨站点比较，以澄清种子与微生境约束的相对重要性（例如Brown等人，2013年），从而改善未来气候情景下树线移动的预测。在这项研究中，我们通过实验测试了在西班牙比利牛斯山脉两种不同的树线类型（突变型和扩散型）上，非生物（温度、降水和积雪）和生物（草食、灌木覆盖和土壤扰动）过滤器是如何塑造红松幼苗建立的动态的。我们假设种子有效性构成了两种树线的主要过滤器，但与突变树线相比，扩散树线内的种子补充对气候变化（尤其是生长季节变暖）更为敏感，在突变树线，尖锐的植被边界预计会施加更强的微站点和生物限制（Elliott, 2011； Harsch等人，2009）。通过将种子添加、草食动物排除和微环境监测整合到一个多因素实验中，我们旨在理清种子供应、生物压力和气候在控制早期招募中的相对作用和相互作用，从而完善对持续气候变化下林木线稳定性和潜在向上发展的机制理解。
{"title":"Disentangling seed availability and establishment filters at alpine treelines through a decade-long field manipulation","authors":"Wentao Lin, Eryuan Liang, J. Julio Camarero","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70204","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2745.70204","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"113 12","pages":"3830-3844"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2745.70204","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145531570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Verónica F. Briceño, Pieter A. Arnold, Alicia M. Cook, Stephanie K. Courtney Jones, Rachael V. Gallagher, Kris French, León A. Bravo, Adrienne B. Nicotra, Andy Leigh
{"title":"Drivers of thermal tolerance breadth of plants across contrasting biomes","authors":"Verónica F. Briceño, Pieter A. Arnold, Alicia M. Cook, Stephanie K. Courtney Jones, Rachael V. Gallagher, Kris French, León A. Bravo, Adrienne B. Nicotra, Andy Leigh","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70198","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2745.70198","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"113 12","pages":"3812-3829"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145515552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Deirdre Loughnan, Faith A. M. Jones, Geoffrey Legault, Daniel Buonaiuto, Catherine Chamberlain, Ailene Ettinger, Mira Garner, Ignacio Morales-Castilla, Darwin Sodhi, E. M. Wolkovich
{"title":"Budburst timing within a functional trait framework","authors":"Deirdre Loughnan, Faith A. M. Jones, Geoffrey Legault, Daniel Buonaiuto, Catherine Chamberlain, Ailene Ettinger, Mira Garner, Ignacio Morales-Castilla, Darwin Sodhi, E. M. Wolkovich","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70196","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2745.70196","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"113 12","pages":"3787-3798"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2745.70196","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145509369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"More exceptions than rules: Variable effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi on leaf litter decomposition in temperate pine forests","authors":"Lang C. DeLancey, Moira J. McCarthy, Klara Peterson, Jay J. Yeam, Laurel Kaminsky, Matthew E. Smith, Kabir G. Peay, Sarah E. Hobbie, Peter G. Kennedy","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70197","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2745.70197","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"113 12","pages":"3799-3811"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2745.70197","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145509317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：