Pub Date : 2021-12-01Epub Date: 2021-08-25DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.02
P Zhao, P W Crous, L W Hou, W J Duan, L Cai, Z Y Ma, F Liu
The current list of Chinese quarantine pests includes 130 fungal species. However, recent changes in the taxonomy of fungi following the one fungus = one name initiative and the implementation of DNA phylogeny in taxonomic revisions, resulted in many changes of these species names, necessitating an update of the current list. In addition, many quarantine fungi lack modern morphological descriptions and authentic DNA sequences, posing significant challenges for the development of diagnostic protocols. The aim of the present study was to review the taxonomy and names of the 33 Chinese quarantine fungi in Dothideomycetes, and provide reliable DNA barcodes to facilitate rapid identification. Of these, 23 names were updated according to the single name nomenclature system, including one new combination, namely Cophinforma tumefaciens comb. nov. (syn. Sphaeropsis tumefaciens). On the basis of phylogenetic analyses and morphological comparisons, a new genus Xenosphaeropsis is introduced to accommodate the monotypic species Xenosphaeropsis pyriputrescens comb. nov. (syn. Sphaeropsis pyriputrescens), the causal agent of a post-harvest disease of pears. Furthermore, four lectotypes (Ascochyta petroselini, Mycosphaerella ligulicola, Physalospora laricina, Sphaeria lingam), three epitypes (Ascochyta petroselini, Phoma lycopersici, Sphaeria lingam), and two neotypes (Ascochyta pinodella, Deuterophoma tracheiphila) are designated to stabilise the use of these names. A further four reference strains are introduced for Cophinforma tumefaciens, Helminthosporium solani, Mycocentrospora acerina, and Septoria linicola. In addition, to assist future studies on these important pathogens, we sequenced and assembled whole genomes for 17 species, including Alternaria triticina, Boeremia foveata, B. lycopersici, Cladosporium cucumerinum, Didymella glomerata, Didymella pinodella, Diplodia mutila, Helminthosporium solani, Mycocentrospora acerina, Neofusicoccum laricinum, Parastagonospora pseudonodorum, Plenodomus libanotidis, Plenodomus lingam, Plenodomus tracheiphilus, Septoria petroselini, Stagonosporopsis chrysanthemi, and Xenosphaeropsis pyriputrescens. Citation: Zhao P, Crous PW, Hou LW, et al. 2021. Fungi of quarantine concern for China I: Dothideomycetes. Persoonia 47: 45-105. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.02.
{"title":"Fungi of quarantine concern for China I: <i>Dothideomycetes</i>.","authors":"P Zhao, P W Crous, L W Hou, W J Duan, L Cai, Z Y Ma, F Liu","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.02","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.02","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current list of Chinese quarantine pests includes 130 fungal species. However, recent changes in the taxonomy of fungi following the one fungus = one name initiative and the implementation of DNA phylogeny in taxonomic revisions, resulted in many changes of these species names, necessitating an update of the current list. In addition, many quarantine fungi lack modern morphological descriptions and authentic DNA sequences, posing significant challenges for the development of diagnostic protocols. The aim of the present study was to review the taxonomy and names of the 33 Chinese quarantine fungi in <i>Dothideomycetes</i>, and provide reliable DNA barcodes to facilitate rapid identification. Of these, 23 names were updated according to the single name nomenclature system, including one new combination, namely <i>Cophinforma tumefaciens</i> comb. nov. (syn. <i>Sphaeropsis tumefaciens</i>)<i>.</i> On the basis of phylogenetic analyses and morphological comparisons, a new genus <i>Xenosphaeropsis</i> is introduced to accommodate the monotypic species <i>Xenosphaeropsis pyriputrescens</i> comb. nov. (syn. <i>Sphaeropsis pyriputrescens</i>), the causal agent of a post-harvest disease of pears. Furthermore, four lectotypes (<i>Ascochyta petroselini</i>, <i>Mycosphaerella ligulicola</i>, <i>Physalospora laricina</i>, <i>Sphaeria lingam</i>), three epitypes (<i>Ascochyta petroselini</i>, <i>Phoma lycopersici</i>, <i>Sphaeria lingam</i>), and two neotypes (<i>Ascochyta pinodella</i>, <i>Deuterophoma tracheiphila</i>) are designated to stabilise the use of these names. A further four reference strains are introduced for <i>Cophinforma tumefaciens</i>, <i>Helminthosporium solani</i>, <i>Mycocentrospora acerina</i>, and <i>Septoria linicola</i>. In addition, to assist future studies on these important pathogens, we sequenced and assembled whole genomes for 17 species, including <i>Alternaria triticina</i>, <i>Boeremia foveata</i>, <i>B. lycopersici</i>, <i>Cladosporium cucumerinum</i>, <i>Didymella glomerata</i>, <i>Didymella pinodella</i>, <i>Diplodia mutila</i>, <i>Helminthosporium solani</i>, <i>Mycocentrospora acerina</i>, <i>Neofusicoccum laricinum</i>, <i>Parastagonospora pseudonodorum</i>, <i>Plenodomus libanotidis</i>, <i>Plenodomus lingam</i>, <i>Plenodomus tracheiphilus</i>, <i>Septoria petroselini</i>, <i>Stagonosporopsis chrysanthemi</i>, and <i>Xenosphaeropsis pyriputrescens</i>. <b>Citation</b>: Zhao P, Crous PW, Hou LW, et al. 2021. Fungi of quarantine concern for China I: Dothideomycetes. Persoonia 47: 45-105. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.02.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486631/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10213211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01Epub Date: 2021-10-01DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.04
N Kobmoo, N Arnamnart, W Pootakham, C Sonthirod, A Khonsanit, W Kuephadungphan, R Suntivich, O V Mosunova, T Giraud, J J Luangsa-Ard
Fungi are rich in complexes of cryptic species that need a combination of different approaches to be delimited, including genomic information. Beauveria (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) is a well-known genus of entomopathogenic fungi, used as a biocontrol agent. In this study we present a polyphasic taxonomy regarding two widely distributed complexes of Beauveria: B. asiatica and B. bassiana s.lat. Some of the genetic groups as previously detected within both taxa were either confirmed or fused using population genomics. High levels of divergence were found between two clades in B. asiatica and among three clades in B. bassiana, supporting their subdivision as distinct species. Morphological examination focusing on the width and the length of phialides and conidia showed no difference among the clades within B. bassiana while conidial length was significantly different among clades within B. asiatica. The secondary metabolite profiles obtained by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) allowed a distinction between B. asiatica and B. bassiana, but not between the clades therein. Based on these genomic, morphological, chemical data, we proposed a clade of B. asiatica as a new species, named B. thailandica, and two clades of B. bassiana to respectively represent B. namnaoensis and B. neobassiana spp. nov. Such closely related but divergent species with different host ranges have potential to elucidate the evolution of host specificity, with potential biocontrol application. Citation: Kobmoo N, Arnamnart N, Pootakham W, et al. 2021. The integrative taxonomy of Beauveria asiatica and B. bassiana species complexes with whole-genome sequencing, morphometric and chemical analyses. Persoonia 47: 136-150. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.04.
真菌中存在丰富的隐性物种群，需要结合不同的方法（包括基因组信息）才能对其进行划分。Beauveria（虫草科，Hypocreales）是一个著名的昆虫病原真菌属，被用作生物控制剂。在本研究中，我们对两种广泛分布的蒲公英复合菌进行了多相分类：B. asiatica 和 B. bassiana s.lat.以前在这两个类群中检测到的一些基因群通过群体基因组学得到了证实或融合。在 B. asiatica 的两个支系之间和 B. bassiana 的三个支系之间发现了高度的分化，支持将它们细分为不同的物种。形态学检查的重点是噬菌体和分生孢子的宽度和长度，结果表明 B. bassiana 内部各支系之间没有差异，而 B. asiatica 内部各支系之间的分生孢子长度有显著差异。通过液相色谱-质谱法（LC-MS）获得的次生代谢物图谱可以区分 B. asiatica 和 B. bassiana，但不能区分其中的支系。根据这些基因组、形态学和化学数据，我们提议将 B. asiatica 的一个支系作为一个新种，命名为 B. thailandica，并将 B. bassiana 的两个支系分别代表 B. namnaoensis 和 B. neobassiana spp.这些亲缘关系密切但寄主范围不同的物种有可能阐明寄主特异性的进化，具有潜在的生物防治应用价值。引用：Kobmoo N, Arnamnart N, Pootakham W, et al.利用全基因组测序、形态计量学和化学分析对亚西亚真菌（Beauveria asiatica）和巴西真菌（B. bassiana）物种复合体进行综合分类。Persoonia 47: 136-150. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.04.
{"title":"The integrative taxonomy of <i>Beauveria asiatica</i> and <i>B. bassiana</i> species complexes with whole-genome sequencing, morphometric and chemical analyses.","authors":"N Kobmoo, N Arnamnart, W Pootakham, C Sonthirod, A Khonsanit, W Kuephadungphan, R Suntivich, O V Mosunova, T Giraud, J J Luangsa-Ard","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.04","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.04","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fungi are rich in complexes of cryptic species that need a combination of different approaches to be delimited, including genomic information. <i>Beauveria</i> (<i>Cordycipitaceae</i>, <i>Hypocreales</i>) is a well-known genus of entomopathogenic fungi, used as a biocontrol agent. In this study we present a polyphasic taxonomy regarding two widely distributed complexes of <i>Beauveria</i>: <i>B. asiatica</i> and <i>B. bassiana</i> s.lat. Some of the genetic groups as previously detected within both taxa were either confirmed or fused using population genomics. High levels of divergence were found between two clades in <i>B. asiatica</i> and among three clades in <i>B. bassiana</i>, supporting their subdivision as distinct species. Morphological examination focusing on the width and the length of phialides and conidia showed no difference among the clades within <i>B. bassiana</i> while conidial length was significantly different among clades within <i>B. asiatica</i>. The secondary metabolite profiles obtained by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) allowed a distinction between <i>B. asiatica</i> and <i>B. bassiana</i>, but not between the clades therein. Based on these genomic, morphological, chemical data, we proposed a clade of <i>B. asiatica</i> as a new species, named <i>B. thailandica</i>, and two clades of <i>B. bassiana</i> to respectively represent <i>B. namnaoensis</i> and <i>B. neobassiana</i> spp. nov. Such closely related but divergent species with different host ranges have potential to elucidate the evolution of host specificity, with potential biocontrol application. <b>Citation</b>: Kobmoo N, Arnamnart N, Pootakham W, et al. 2021. The integrative taxonomy of Beauveria asiatica and B. bassiana species complexes with whole-genome sequencing, morphometric and chemical analyses. Persoonia 47: 136-150. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.04.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486633/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10213210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01Epub Date: 2021-01-13DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03
X E Xiao, W Wang, P W Crous, H K Wang, C Jiao, F Huang, Z X Pu, Z R Zhu, H Y Li
Citrus is an important and widely cultivated fruit crop in South China. Although the species of fungal diseases of leaves and fruits have been extensively studied, the causal organisms of branch diseases remain poorly known in China. Species of Botryosphaeriaceae are known as important fungal pathogens causing branch diseases on citrus in the USA and Europe. To determine the diversity of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with citrus branch diseases in China, surveys were conducted in the major citrus-producing areas from 2017 to 2020. Diseased tissues were collected from twigs, branches and trunks with a range of symptoms including cankers, cracking, dieback and gummosis. Based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic comparison of the DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), the translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (tef1), the β-tubulin gene (tub2) and the DNA-directed RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2), 111 isolates from nine provinces were identified as 18 species of Botryosphaeriaceae, including Botryosphaeria dothidea, B. fabicerciana, Diplodia seriata, Dothiorella alpina, Do. plurivora, Lasiodiplodia citricola, L. iraniensis, L. microconidia, L. pseudotheobromae, L. theobromae, Neodeightonia subglobosa, Neofusicoccum parvum, and six previously undescribed species, namely Do. citrimurcotticola, L.guilinensis, L. huangyanensis, L. linhaiensis, L. ponkanicola and Sphaeropsis linhaiensis spp. nov. Botryosphaeria dothidea (28.8 %) was the most abundant species, followed by L. pseudotheobromae (23.4 %), which was the most widely distributed species on citrus, occurring in six of the nine provinces sampled. Pathogenicity tests indicated that all 18 species of Botryosphaeriaceae obtained from diseased citrus tissues in this study were pathogenic to the tested Citrus reticulata shoots in vitro, while not all species are pathogenic to the tested Cocktail grapefruit (C. paradisi × C. reticulata) shoots in vivo. In addition, Lasiodiplodia was the most aggressive genus both in vitro and in vivo. This is the first study to identify Botryosphaeriaceae species related to citrus branch diseases in China and the results provide a theoretical basis for the implementation of prevention and control measures. Citation: Xiao XE, Wang W, Crous PW, et al. 2021. Species of Botryosphaeriaceae associated with citrus branch diseases in China. Persoonia 47: 106-135. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03.
柑橘是华南地区广泛种植的重要水果作物。虽然对柑橘叶片和果实的真菌病害种类进行了广泛研究，但对柑橘枝干病害的病原菌却知之甚少。众所周知，在美国和欧洲，Botryosphaeriaceae 的物种是导致柑橘枝干病害的重要真菌病原体。为确定与中国柑橘枝干病害相关的 Botryosphaeriaceae 物种的多样性，2017 年至 2020 年在柑橘主产区进行了调查。从树枝、枝条和树干上采集了病害组织，病害症状包括腐烂病、开裂病、枯死病和胶冻病。根据形态特征以及内部转录间隔区（ITS）、翻译伸长因子 1-α基因（tef1）、β-微管蛋白基因（tub2）和 DNA 引导的 RNA 聚合酶 II 第二大亚基（rpb2）的 DNA 序列的系统发育比较，来自 9 个省的 111 个分离物被鉴定为 18 种 Botryosphaeriaceae，包括 Botryosphaeria dothidea、B.plurivora、Lasiodiplodia citricola、L. iraniensis、L. microconidia、L. pseudotheobromae、L.thobromae、Neodeightonia subglobosa、Neofusicoccum parvum，以及 6 个以前未曾描述过的种，即 Do. citrimurcotticola、L. guilinensis、L. huangyanensis、L. linhaiensis、L. ponkanicola 和 Sphaeropsis linhaiensis spp.在柑橘上分布最广的物种是 L. pseudotheobromae（23.4%），它在取样的 9 个省中有 6 个省都有分布。致病性测试表明，本研究中从病柑橘组织中获得的所有 18 个 Botryosphaeriaceae 物种在体外均对受测的网纹柑橘嫩枝具有致病性，但并非所有物种在体内均对受测的鸡尾柚（C. paradisi × C. reticulata）嫩枝具有致病性。此外，Lasiodiplodia 在体外和体内都是最具侵袭性的属。这是首次在中国发现与柑橘枝干病害相关的Botryosphaeriaceae物种，其结果为实施预防和控制措施提供了理论依据。引用：Xiao XE, Wang W, Crous PW, et al.与中国柑橘枝干病害相关的 Botryosphaeriaceae 物种.Persoonia 47: 106-135. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03.
{"title":"Species of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> associated with citrus branch diseases in China.","authors":"X E Xiao, W Wang, P W Crous, H K Wang, C Jiao, F Huang, Z X Pu, Z R Zhu, H Y Li","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Citrus is an important and widely cultivated fruit crop in South China. Although the species of fungal diseases of leaves and fruits have been extensively studied, the causal organisms of branch diseases remain poorly known in China. Species of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> are known as important fungal pathogens causing branch diseases on citrus in the USA and Europe. To determine the diversity of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> species associated with citrus branch diseases in China, surveys were conducted in the major citrus-producing areas from 2017 to 2020. Diseased tissues were collected from twigs, branches and trunks with a range of symptoms including cankers, cracking, dieback and gummosis. Based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic comparison of the DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), the translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (<i>tef1</i>), the β-tubulin gene (<i>tub2</i>) and the DNA-directed RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (<i>rpb2</i>), 111 isolates from nine provinces were identified as 18 species of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i>, including <i>Botryosphaeria dothidea</i>, <i>B. fabicerciana</i>, <i>Diplodia seriata</i>, <i>Dothiorella alpina</i>, <i>Do. plurivora</i>, <i>Lasiodiplodia citricola</i>, <i>L. iraniensis</i>, <i>L. microconidia</i>, <i>L. pseudotheobromae</i>, <i>L. theobromae</i>, <i>Neodeightonia subglobosa</i>, <i>Neofusicoccum parvum</i>, and six previously undescribed species, namely <i>Do. citrimurcotticola</i>, <i>L.</i> <i>guilinensis</i>, <i>L. huangyanensis</i>, <i>L. linhaiensis</i>, <i>L. ponkanicola</i> and <i>Sphaeropsis linhaiensis</i> spp. nov. <i>Botryosphaeria dothidea</i> (28.8 %) was the most abundant species, followed by <i>L. pseudotheobromae</i> (23.4 %), which was the most widely distributed species on citrus, occurring in six of the nine provinces sampled. Pathogenicity tests indicated that all 18 species of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> obtained from diseased citrus tissues in this study were pathogenic to the tested <i>Citrus reticulata</i> shoots <i>in vitro</i>, while not all species are pathogenic to the tested Cocktail grapefruit (<i>C. paradisi</i> × <i>C. reticulata</i>) shoots <i>in vivo</i>. In addition, <i>Lasiodiplodia</i> was the most aggressive genus both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. This is the first study to identify <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> species related to citrus branch diseases in China and the results provide a theoretical basis for the implementation of prevention and control measures. <b>Citation</b>: Xiao XE, Wang W, Crous PW, et al. 2021. Species of Botryosphaeriaceae associated with citrus branch diseases in China. Persoonia 47: 106-135. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486630/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10213205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01Epub Date: 2021-12-24DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.06
P W Crous, E R Osieck, Ž Jurjević, J Boers, A L van Iperen, M Starink-Willemse, B Dima, S Balashov, T S Bulgakov, P R Johnston, O V Morozova, U Pinruan, S Sommai, P Alvarado, C A Decock, T Lebel, S McMullan-Fisher, G Moreno, R G Shivas, L Zhao, J Abdollahzadeh, M Abrinbana, D V Ageev, G Akhmetova, A V Alexandrova, A Altés, A G G Amaral, C Angelini, V Antonín, F Arenas, P Asselman, F Badali, A Baghela, A Bañares, R W Barreto, I G Baseia, J-M Bellanger, A Berraf-Tebbal, A Yu Biketova, N V Bukharova, T I Burgess, J Cabero, M P S Câmara, J F Cano-Lira, P Ceryngier, R Chávez, D A Cowan, A F de Lima, R L Oliveira, S Denman, Q N Dang, F Dovana, I G Duarte, A Eichmeier, A Erhard, F Esteve-Raventós, A Fellin, G Ferisin, R J Ferreira, A Ferrer, P Finy, E Gaya, A D W Geering, C Gil-Durán, K Glässnerová, A M Glushakova, D Gramaje, F E Guard, A L Guarnizo, D Haelewaters, R E Halling, R Hill, Y Hirooka, V Hubka, V A Iliushin, D D Ivanova, N E Ivanushkina, P Jangsantear, A Justo, A V Kachalkin, S Kato, P Khamsuntorn, I Y Kirtsideli, D G Knapp, G A Kochkina, O Koukol, G M Kovács, J Kruse, T K A Kumar, I Kušan, T Læssøe, E Larsson, R Lebeuf, G Levicán, M Loizides, P Marinho, J J Luangsa-Ard, E G Lukina, V Magaña-Dueñas, G Maggs-Kölling, E F Malysheva, V F Malysheva, B Martín, M P Martín, N Matočec, A R McTaggart, M Mehrabi-Koushki, A Mešić, A N Miller, P Mironova, P-A Moreau, A Morte, K Müller, L G Nagy, S Nanu, A Navarro-Ródenas, W J Nel, T H Nguyen, T F Nóbrega, M E Noordeloos, I Olariaga, B E Overton, S M Ozerskaya, P Palani, F Pancorbo, V Papp, J Pawłowska, T Q Pham, C Phosri, E S Popov, A Portugal, A Pošta, K Reschke, M Reul, G M Ricci, A Rodríguez, J Romanowski, N Ruchikachorn, I Saar, A Safi, B Sakolrak, F Salzmann, M Sandoval-Denis, E Sangwichein, L Sanhueza, T Sato, A Sastoque, B Senn-Irlet, A Shibata, K Siepe, S Somrithipol, M Spetik, P Sridhar, A M Stchigel, K Stuskova, N Suwannasai, Y P Tan, R Thangavel, I Tiago, S Tiwari, Z Tkalčec, M A Tomashevskaya, C Tonegawa, H X Tran, N T Tran, J Trovão, V E Trubitsyn, J Van Wyk, W A S Vieira, J Vila, C M Visagie, A Vizzini, S V Volobuev, D T Vu, N Wangsawat, T Yaguchi, E Ercole, B W Ferreira, A P de Souza, B S Vieira, J Z Groenewald
Novel species of fungi described in this study include those from various countries as follows: Antartica, Cladosporium austrolitorale from coastal sea sand. Australia, Austroboletus yourkae on soil, Crepidotusinnuopurpureus on dead wood, Curvularia stenotaphri from roots and leaves of Stenotaphrum secundatum and Thecaphora stajsicii from capsules of Oxalis radicosa.Belgium, Paraxerochrysium coryli (incl. Paraxerochrysium gen. nov.) from Corylus avellana.Brazil, Calvatia nordestina on soil, Didymella tabebuiicola from leaf spots on Tabebuia aurea, Fusarium subflagellisporum from hypertrophied floral and vegetative branches of Mangifera indica and Microdochium maculosum from living leaves of Digitaria insularis.Canada, Cuphophyllus bondii from a grassland. Croatia, Mollisia inferiseptata from a rotten Laurus nobilis trunk. Cyprus, Amanita exilis on calcareous soil. Czech Republic, Cytospora hippophaicola from wood of symptomatic Vaccinium corymbosum.Denmark, Lasiosphaeria deviata on pieces of wood and herbaceous debris. Dominican Republic, Calocybella goethei among grass on a lawn. France (Corsica), Inocybe corsica on wet ground. France (French Guiana), Trechispora patawaensis on decayed branch of unknown angiosperm tree and Trechispora subregularis on decayed log of unknown angiosperm tree. Germany, Paramicrotheciumsambuci (incl. Paramicrothecium gen. nov.) on dead stems of Sambucus nigra.India, Aureobasidium microtermitis from the gut of a Microtermes sp. termite, Laccaria diospyricola on soil and Phylloporia tamilnadensis on branches of Catunaregam spinosa. Iran, Pythium serotinoosporum from soil under Prunus dulcis.Italy, Pluteus brunneovenosus on twigs of broadleaved trees on the ground. Japan, Heterophoma rehmanniae on leaves of Rehmannia glutinosa f. hueichingensis.Kazakhstan, Murispora kazachstanica from healthy roots of Triticum aestivum.Namibia, Caespitomoniumeuphorbiae (incl. Caespitomonium gen. nov.) from stems of an Euphorbia sp. Netherlands, Alfaria junci, Myrmecridium junci, Myrmecridium juncicola, Myrmecridium juncigenum, Ophioceras junci, Paradinemasporium junci (incl. Paradinemasporium gen. nov.), Phialoseptomonium junci, Sporidesmiella juncicola, Xenopyriculariajunci and Zaanenomyces quadripartis (incl. Zaanenomyces gen. nov.), from dead culms of Juncus effusus, Cylindromonium everniae and Rhodoveronaea everniae from Evernia prunastri, Cyphellophora sambuci and Myrmecridiu
{"title":"Fungal Planet description sheets: 1284-1382.","authors":"P W Crous, E R Osieck, Ž Jurjević, J Boers, A L van Iperen, M Starink-Willemse, B Dima, S Balashov, T S Bulgakov, P R Johnston, O V Morozova, U Pinruan, S Sommai, P Alvarado, C A Decock, T Lebel, S McMullan-Fisher, G Moreno, R G Shivas, L Zhao, J Abdollahzadeh, M Abrinbana, D V Ageev, G Akhmetova, A V Alexandrova, A Altés, A G G Amaral, C Angelini, V Antonín, F Arenas, P Asselman, F Badali, A Baghela, A Bañares, R W Barreto, I G Baseia, J-M Bellanger, A Berraf-Tebbal, A Yu Biketova, N V Bukharova, T I Burgess, J Cabero, M P S Câmara, J F Cano-Lira, P Ceryngier, R Chávez, D A Cowan, A F de Lima, R L Oliveira, S Denman, Q N Dang, F Dovana, I G Duarte, A Eichmeier, A Erhard, F Esteve-Raventós, A Fellin, G Ferisin, R J Ferreira, A Ferrer, P Finy, E Gaya, A D W Geering, C Gil-Durán, K Glässnerová, A M Glushakova, D Gramaje, F E Guard, A L Guarnizo, D Haelewaters, R E Halling, R Hill, Y Hirooka, V Hubka, V A Iliushin, D D Ivanova, N E Ivanushkina, P Jangsantear, A Justo, A V Kachalkin, S Kato, P Khamsuntorn, I Y Kirtsideli, D G Knapp, G A Kochkina, O Koukol, G M Kovács, J Kruse, T K A Kumar, I Kušan, T Læssøe, E Larsson, R Lebeuf, G Levicán, M Loizides, P Marinho, J J Luangsa-Ard, E G Lukina, V Magaña-Dueñas, G Maggs-Kölling, E F Malysheva, V F Malysheva, B Martín, M P Martín, N Matočec, A R McTaggart, M Mehrabi-Koushki, A Mešić, A N Miller, P Mironova, P-A Moreau, A Morte, K Müller, L G Nagy, S Nanu, A Navarro-Ródenas, W J Nel, T H Nguyen, T F Nóbrega, M E Noordeloos, I Olariaga, B E Overton, S M Ozerskaya, P Palani, F Pancorbo, V Papp, J Pawłowska, T Q Pham, C Phosri, E S Popov, A Portugal, A Pošta, K Reschke, M Reul, G M Ricci, A Rodríguez, J Romanowski, N Ruchikachorn, I Saar, A Safi, B Sakolrak, F Salzmann, M Sandoval-Denis, E Sangwichein, L Sanhueza, T Sato, A Sastoque, B Senn-Irlet, A Shibata, K Siepe, S Somrithipol, M Spetik, P Sridhar, A M Stchigel, K Stuskova, N Suwannasai, Y P Tan, R Thangavel, I Tiago, S Tiwari, Z Tkalčec, M A Tomashevskaya, C Tonegawa, H X Tran, N T Tran, J Trovão, V E Trubitsyn, J Van Wyk, W A S Vieira, J Vila, C M Visagie, A Vizzini, S V Volobuev, D T Vu, N Wangsawat, T Yaguchi, E Ercole, B W Ferreira, A P de Souza, B S Vieira, J Z Groenewald","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.06","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Novel species of fungi described in this study include those from various countries as follows: <b>Antartica</b>, <i>Cladosporium austrolitorale</i> from coastal sea sand. <b>Australia</b>, <i>Austroboletus yourkae</i> on soil, <i>Crepidotus</i> <i>innuopurpureus</i> on dead wood, <i>Curvularia stenotaphri</i> from roots and leaves of <i>Stenotaphrum secundatum</i> and <i>Thecaphora stajsicii</i> from capsules of <i>Oxalis radicosa.</i> <b>Belgium</b>, <i>Paraxerochrysium coryli</i> (incl. <i>Paraxerochrysium</i> gen. nov.) from <i>Corylus avellana.</i> <b>Brazil</b>, <i>Calvatia nordestina</i> on soil, <i>Didymella tabebuiicola</i> from leaf spots on <i>Tabebuia aurea, Fusarium subflagellisporum</i> from hypertrophied floral and vegetative branches of <i>Mangifera indica</i> and <i>Microdochium maculosum</i> from living leaves of <i>Digitaria insularis.</i> <b>Canada</b>, <i>Cuphophyllus bondii</i> from a grassland. <b>Croatia</b>, <i>Mollisia inferiseptata</i> from a rotten <i>Laurus nobilis</i> trunk. <b>Cyprus</b>, <i>Amanita exilis</i> on calcareous soil. <b>Czech Republic</b>, <i>Cytospora hippophaicola</i> from wood of symptomatic <i>Vaccinium corymbosum.</i> <b>Denmark</b>, <i>Lasiosphaeria deviata</i> on pieces of wood and herbaceous debris. <b>Dominican Republic</b>, <i>Calocybella goethei</i> among grass on a lawn. <b>France (Corsica)</b>, <i>Inocybe corsica</i> on wet ground. <b>France (French Guiana)</b>, <i>Trechispora patawaensis</i> on decayed branch of unknown angiosperm tree and <i>Trechispora subregularis</i> on decayed log of unknown angiosperm tree. <b>Germany</b>, <i>Paramicrothecium</i> <i>sambuci</i> (incl. <i>Paramicrothecium</i> gen. nov.) on dead stems of <i>Sambucus nigra.</i> <b>India</b>, <i>Aureobasidium microtermitis</i> from the gut of a <i>Microtermes</i> sp. termite, <i>Laccaria diospyricola</i> on soil and <i>Phylloporia tamilnadensis</i> on branches of <i>Catunaregam spinosa</i>. <b>Iran</b>, <i>Pythium serotinoosporum</i> from soil under <i>Prunus dulcis.</i> <b>Italy</b>, <i>Pluteus brunneovenosus</i> on twigs of broadleaved trees on the ground. <b>Japan</b>, <i>Heterophoma rehmanniae</i> on leaves of <i>Rehmannia glutinosa</i> f. <i>hueichingensis.</i> <b>Kazakhstan</b>, <i>Murispora kazachstanica</i> from healthy roots of <i>Triticum aestivum.</i> <b>Namibia</b>, <i>Caespitomonium</i> <i>euphorbiae</i> (incl. <i>Caespitomonium</i> gen. nov.) from stems of an <i>Euphorbia</i> sp. <b>Netherlands</b>, <i>Alfaria junci, Myrmecridium junci, Myrmecridium juncicola, Myrmecridium juncigenum, Ophioceras junci, Paradinemasporium junci</i> (incl. <i>Paradinemasporium</i> gen. nov.), <i>Phialoseptomonium junci, Sporidesmiella juncicola, Xenopyricularia</i> <i>junci</i> and <i>Zaanenomyces quadripartis</i> (incl. <i>Zaanenomyces</i> gen. nov.), from dead culms of <i>Juncus effusus, Cylindromonium everniae</i> and <i>Rhodoveronaea everniae</i> from <i>Evernia prunastri, Cyphellophora sambuci</i> and <i>Myrmecridiu","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486635/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10221536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-12-01Epub Date: 2021-12-23DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.05
T I Burgess, J Edwards, A Drenth, T Massenbauer, J Cunnington, R Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa, Q Dinh, E C Y Liew, D White, P Scott, P A Barber, E O'Gara, J Ciampini, K L McDougall, Y P Tan
Among the most economically relevant and environmentally devastating diseases globally are those caused by Phytophthora species. In Australia, production losses in agriculture and forestry result from several well-known cosmopolitan Phytophthora species and infestation of natural ecosystems by Phytophthora cinnamomi have caused irretrievable loss to biodiversity especially in proteaceous dominated heathlands. For this review, all available records of Phytophthora in Australia were collated and curated, resulting in a database of 7 869 records, of which 2 957 have associated molecular data. Australian databases hold records for 99 species, of which 20 are undescribed. Eight species have no records linked to molecular data, and their presence in Australia is considered doubtful. The 99 species reside in 10 of the 12 clades recognised within the complete phylogeny of Phytophthora. The review includes discussion on each of these species' status and additional information provided for another 29 species of concern. The first species reported in Australia in 1900 was Phytophthora infestans. By 2000, 27 species were known, predominantly from agriculture. The significant increase in species reported in the subsequent 20 years has coincided with extensive surveys in natural ecosystems coupled with molecular taxonomy and the recognition of numerous new phylogenetically distinct but morphologically similar species. Routine and targeted surveys within Australian natural ecosystems have resulted in the description of 27 species since 2009. Due to the new species descriptions over the last 20 years, many older records have been reclassified based on molecular identification. The distribution of records is skewed toward regions with considerable activity in high productivity agriculture, horticulture and forestry, and native vegetation at risk from P. cinnamomi. Native and exotic hosts of different Phytophthora species are found throughout the phylogeny; however, species from clades 1, 7 and 8 are more likely to be associated with exotic hosts. One of the most difficult challenges to overcome when establishing a pest status is a lack of reliable data on the current state of a species in any given country or location. The database compiled here for Australia and the information provided for each species overcomes this challenge. This review will aid federal and state governments in risk assessments and trade negotiations by providing a comprehensive resource on the current status of Phytophthora species in Australia. Citation: Burgess TI, Edwards J, Drenth A, et al. 2021. Current status of Phytophthora in Australia. Persoonia 47: 151-177. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.05.
{"title":"Current status of <i>Phytophthora</i> in Australia.","authors":"T I Burgess, J Edwards, A Drenth, T Massenbauer, J Cunnington, R Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa, Q Dinh, E C Y Liew, D White, P Scott, P A Barber, E O'Gara, J Ciampini, K L McDougall, Y P Tan","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.05","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.05","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among the most economically relevant and environmentally devastating diseases globally are those caused by <i>Phytophthora</i> species. In Australia, production losses in agriculture and forestry result from several well-known cosmopolitan <i>Phytophthora</i> species and infestation of natural ecosystems by <i>Phytophthora cinnamomi</i> have caused irretrievable loss to biodiversity especially in proteaceous dominated heathlands. For this review, all available records of <i>Phytophthora</i> in Australia were collated and curated, resulting in a database of 7 869 records, of which 2 957 have associated molecular data. Australian databases hold records for 99 species, of which 20 are undescribed. Eight species have no records linked to molecular data, and their presence in Australia is considered doubtful. The 99 species reside in 10 of the 12 clades recognised within the complete phylogeny of <i>Phytophthora.</i> The review includes discussion on each of these species' status and additional information provided for another 29 species of concern. The first species reported in Australia in 1900 was <i>Phytophthora infestans.</i> By 2000, 27 species were known, predominantly from agriculture. The significant increase in species reported in the subsequent 20 years has coincided with extensive surveys in natural ecosystems coupled with molecular taxonomy and the recognition of numerous new phylogenetically distinct but morphologically similar species. Routine and targeted surveys within Australian natural ecosystems have resulted in the description of 27 species since 2009. Due to the new species descriptions over the last 20 years, many older records have been reclassified based on molecular identification. The distribution of records is skewed toward regions with considerable activity in high productivity agriculture, horticulture and forestry, and native vegetation at risk from <i>P. cinnamomi.</i> Native and exotic hosts of different <i>Phytophthora</i> species are found throughout the phylogeny; however, species from clades 1, 7 and 8 are more likely to be associated with exotic hosts. One of the most difficult challenges to overcome when establishing a pest status is a lack of reliable data on the current state of a species in any given country or location. The database compiled here for Australia and the information provided for each species overcomes this challenge. This review will aid federal and state governments in risk assessments and trade negotiations by providing a comprehensive resource on the current status of <i>Phytophthora</i> species in Australia. <b>Citation:</b> Burgess TI, Edwards J, Drenth A, et al. 2021. Current status of Phytophthora in Australia. Persoonia 47: 151-177. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.05.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10486634/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10213206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-01Epub Date: 2021-12-23DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.05
T I Burgess, J Edwards, A Drenth, T Massenbauer, J Cunnington, R Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa, Q Dinh, E C Y Liew, D White, P Scott, P A Barber, E O'Gara, J Ciampini, K L McDougall, Y P Tan
Among the most economically relevant and environmentally devastating diseases globally are those caused by Phytophthora species. In Australia, production losses in agriculture and forestry result from several well-known cosmopolitan Phytophthora species and infestation of natural ecosystems by Phytophthora cinnamomi have caused irretrievable loss to biodiversity especially in proteaceous dominated heathlands. For this review, all available records of Phytophthora in Australia were collated and curated, resulting in a database of 7 869 records, of which 2 957 have associated molecular data. Australian databases hold records for 99 species, of which 20 are undescribed. Eight species have no records linked to molecular data, and their presence in Australia is considered doubtful. The 99 species reside in 10 of the 12 clades recognised within the complete phylogeny of Phytophthora. The review includes discussion on each of these species' status and additional information provided for another 29 species of concern. The first species reported in Australia in 1900 was Phytophthora infestans. By 2000, 27 species were known, predominantly from agriculture. The significant increase in species reported in the subsequent 20 years has coincided with extensive surveys in natural ecosystems coupled with molecular taxonomy and the recognition of numerous new phylogenetically distinct but morphologically similar species. Routine and targeted surveys within Australian natural ecosystems have resulted in the description of 27 species since 2009. Due to the new species descriptions over the last 20 years, many older records have been reclassified based on molecular identification. The distribution of records is skewed toward regions with considerable activity in high productivity agriculture, horticulture and forestry, and native vegetation at risk from P. cinnamomi. Native and exotic hosts of different Phytophthora species are found throughout the phylogeny; however, species from clades 1, 7 and 8 are more likely to be associated with exotic hosts. One of the most difficult challenges to overcome when establishing a pest status is a lack of reliable data on the current state of a species in any given country or location. The database compiled here for Australia and the information provided for each species overcomes this challenge. This review will aid federal and state governments in risk assessments and trade negotiations by providing a comprehensive resource on the current status of Phytophthora species in Australia. Citation: Burgess TI, Edwards J, Drenth A, et al. 2021. Current status of Phytophthora in Australia. Persoonia 47: 151-177. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.05.
{"title":"Current status of <i>Phytophthora</i> in Australia.","authors":"T I Burgess, J Edwards, A Drenth, T Massenbauer, J Cunnington, R Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa, Q Dinh, E C Y Liew, D White, P Scott, P A Barber, E O'Gara, J Ciampini, K L McDougall, Y P Tan","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.05","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.05","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among the most economically relevant and environmentally devastating diseases globally are those caused by <i>Phytophthora</i> species. In Australia, production losses in agriculture and forestry result from several well-known cosmopolitan <i>Phytophthora</i> species and infestation of natural ecosystems by <i>Phytophthora cinnamomi</i> have caused irretrievable loss to biodiversity especially in proteaceous dominated heathlands. For this review, all available records of <i>Phytophthora</i> in Australia were collated and curated, resulting in a database of 7 869 records, of which 2 957 have associated molecular data. Australian databases hold records for 99 species, of which 20 are undescribed. Eight species have no records linked to molecular data, and their presence in Australia is considered doubtful. The 99 species reside in 10 of the 12 clades recognised within the complete phylogeny of <i>Phytophthora.</i> The review includes discussion on each of these species' status and additional information provided for another 29 species of concern. The first species reported in Australia in 1900 was <i>Phytophthora infestans.</i> By 2000, 27 species were known, predominantly from agriculture. The significant increase in species reported in the subsequent 20 years has coincided with extensive surveys in natural ecosystems coupled with molecular taxonomy and the recognition of numerous new phylogenetically distinct but morphologically similar species. Routine and targeted surveys within Australian natural ecosystems have resulted in the description of 27 species since 2009. Due to the new species descriptions over the last 20 years, many older records have been reclassified based on molecular identification. The distribution of records is skewed toward regions with considerable activity in high productivity agriculture, horticulture and forestry, and native vegetation at risk from <i>P. cinnamomi.</i> Native and exotic hosts of different <i>Phytophthora</i> species are found throughout the phylogeny; however, species from clades 1, 7 and 8 are more likely to be associated with exotic hosts. One of the most difficult challenges to overcome when establishing a pest status is a lack of reliable data on the current state of a species in any given country or location. The database compiled here for Australia and the information provided for each species overcomes this challenge. This review will aid federal and state governments in risk assessments and trade negotiations by providing a comprehensive resource on the current status of <i>Phytophthora</i> species in Australia. <b>Citation:</b> Burgess TI, Edwards J, Drenth A, et al. 2021. Current status of Phytophthora in Australia. Persoonia 47: 151-177. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.05.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139730238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-01Epub Date: 2021-08-25DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.02
P Zhao, P W Crous, L W Hou, W J Duan, L Cai, Z Y Ma, F Liu
The current list of Chinese quarantine pests includes 130 fungal species. However, recent changes in the taxonomy of fungi following the one fungus = one name initiative and the implementation of DNA phylogeny in taxonomic revisions, resulted in many changes of these species names, necessitating an update of the current list. In addition, many quarantine fungi lack modern morphological descriptions and authentic DNA sequences, posing significant challenges for the development of diagnostic protocols. The aim of the present study was to review the taxonomy and names of the 33 Chinese quarantine fungi in Dothideomycetes, and provide reliable DNA barcodes to facilitate rapid identification. Of these, 23 names were updated according to the single name nomenclature system, including one new combination, namely Cophinforma tumefaciens comb. nov. (syn. Sphaeropsis tumefaciens). On the basis of phylogenetic analyses and morphological comparisons, a new genus Xenosphaeropsis is introduced to accommodate the monotypic species Xenosphaeropsis pyriputrescens comb. nov. (syn. Sphaeropsis pyriputrescens), the causal agent of a post-harvest disease of pears. Furthermore, four lectotypes (Ascochyta petroselini, Mycosphaerella ligulicola, Physalospora laricina, Sphaeria lingam), three epitypes (Ascochyta petroselini, Phoma lycopersici, Sphaeria lingam), and two neotypes (Ascochyta pinodella, Deuterophoma tracheiphila) are designated to stabilise the use of these names. A further four reference strains are introduced for Cophinforma tumefaciens, Helminthosporium solani, Mycocentrospora acerina, and Septoria linicola. In addition, to assist future studies on these important pathogens, we sequenced and assembled whole genomes for 17 species, including Alternaria triticina, Boeremia foveata, B. lycopersici, Cladosporium cucumerinum, Didymella glomerata, Didymella pinodella, Diplodia mutila, Helminthosporium solani, Mycocentrospora acerina, Neofusicoccum laricinum, Parastagonospora pseudonodorum, Plenodomus libanotidis, Plenodomus lingam, Plenodomus tracheiphilus, Septoria petroselini, Stagonosporopsis chrysanthemi, and Xenosphaeropsis pyriputrescens. Citation: Zhao P, Crous PW, Hou LW, et al. 2021. Fungi of quarantine concern for China I: Dothideomycetes. Persoonia 47: 45-105. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.02.
{"title":"Fungi of quarantine concern for China I: <i>Dothideomycetes</i>.","authors":"P Zhao, P W Crous, L W Hou, W J Duan, L Cai, Z Y Ma, F Liu","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.02","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.02","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current list of Chinese quarantine pests includes 130 fungal species. However, recent changes in the taxonomy of fungi following the one fungus = one name initiative and the implementation of DNA phylogeny in taxonomic revisions, resulted in many changes of these species names, necessitating an update of the current list. In addition, many quarantine fungi lack modern morphological descriptions and authentic DNA sequences, posing significant challenges for the development of diagnostic protocols. The aim of the present study was to review the taxonomy and names of the 33 Chinese quarantine fungi in <i>Dothideomycetes</i>, and provide reliable DNA barcodes to facilitate rapid identification. Of these, 23 names were updated according to the single name nomenclature system, including one new combination, namely <i>Cophinforma tumefaciens</i> comb. nov. (syn. <i>Sphaeropsis tumefaciens</i>)<i>.</i> On the basis of phylogenetic analyses and morphological comparisons, a new genus <i>Xenosphaeropsis</i> is introduced to accommodate the monotypic species <i>Xenosphaeropsis pyriputrescens</i> comb. nov. (syn. <i>Sphaeropsis pyriputrescens</i>), the causal agent of a post-harvest disease of pears. Furthermore, four lectotypes (<i>Ascochyta petroselini</i>, <i>Mycosphaerella ligulicola</i>, <i>Physalospora laricina</i>, <i>Sphaeria lingam</i>), three epitypes (<i>Ascochyta petroselini</i>, <i>Phoma lycopersici</i>, <i>Sphaeria lingam</i>), and two neotypes (<i>Ascochyta pinodella</i>, <i>Deuterophoma tracheiphila</i>) are designated to stabilise the use of these names. A further four reference strains are introduced for <i>Cophinforma tumefaciens</i>, <i>Helminthosporium solani</i>, <i>Mycocentrospora acerina</i>, and <i>Septoria linicola</i>. In addition, to assist future studies on these important pathogens, we sequenced and assembled whole genomes for 17 species, including <i>Alternaria triticina</i>, <i>Boeremia foveata</i>, <i>B. lycopersici</i>, <i>Cladosporium cucumerinum</i>, <i>Didymella glomerata</i>, <i>Didymella pinodella</i>, <i>Diplodia mutila</i>, <i>Helminthosporium solani</i>, <i>Mycocentrospora acerina</i>, <i>Neofusicoccum laricinum</i>, <i>Parastagonospora pseudonodorum</i>, <i>Plenodomus libanotidis</i>, <i>Plenodomus lingam</i>, <i>Plenodomus tracheiphilus</i>, <i>Septoria petroselini</i>, <i>Stagonosporopsis chrysanthemi</i>, and <i>Xenosphaeropsis pyriputrescens</i>. <b>Citation</b>: Zhao P, Crous PW, Hou LW, et al. 2021. Fungi of quarantine concern for China I: Dothideomycetes. Persoonia 47: 45-105. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.02.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139730240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-01Epub Date: 2021-08-03DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.01
T Lebel, J Douch, L Tegart, L Vaughan, J A Cooper, J Nuytinck
The Lactifluus clarkeae complex is a commonly observed, generally brightly coloured, group of mushrooms that are usually associated with Nothofagus or Myrtaceous hosts in Australia and New Zealand. For this study collections labelled as 'Lactarius clarkeae', 'Russula flocktoniae' and 'Lactarius subclarkeae' were examined morphologically and molecularly. Analyses of molecular data showed a high cryptic diversity, with sequences scattered across 11 clades in three subgenera within Lactifluus, and a single collection in Russula. We select epitypes to anchor the currently accepted concepts of Lf. clarkeae s.str. and Lf. flocktoniae s.str. The name Lf. subclarkeae could not be applied to any of the collections examined, as none had a lamprotrichoderm pileipellis. Lactifluus clarkeae var. aurantioruber is raised to species level, and six new species are described, three in subg. Lactifluus: Lf. jetiae, Lf. pagodicystidiatus, and Lf. rugulostipitatus, and three in subg. Gymnocarpi: Lf. albens, Lf. psammophilus, and Lf. pseudoflocktoniae. A new collection of Lf. russulisporus provides a significant range extension for the species. Untangling this complex will enable better identification of species and increase understanding of diversity and specific habitat associations of macrofungi. Citation: Lebel T, Douch J, Tegart L, et al. 2021. Untangling the Lactifluus clarkeae - Lf. flocktoniae (Russulaceae) species complex in Australasia. Persoonia 47: 1-44. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.01.
{"title":"Untangling the <i>Lactifluus clarkeae - Lf. flocktoniae</i>(<i>Russulaceae</i>) species complex in Australasia.","authors":"T Lebel, J Douch, L Tegart, L Vaughan, J A Cooper, J Nuytinck","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.01","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.01","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Lactifluus clarkeae</i> complex is a commonly observed, generally brightly coloured, group of mushrooms that are usually associated with <i>Nothofagus</i> or Myrtaceous hosts in Australia and New Zealand. For this study collections labelled as '<i>Lactarius clarkeae</i>', '<i>Russula flocktoniae</i>' and '<i>Lactarius subclarkeae</i>' were examined morphologically and molecularly. Analyses of molecular data showed a high cryptic diversity, with sequences scattered across 11 clades in three subgenera within <i>Lactifluus</i>, and a single collection in <i>Russula.</i> We select epitypes to anchor the currently accepted concepts of <i>Lf. clarkeae</i> s.str. and <i>Lf. flocktoniae</i> s.str. The name <i>Lf. subclarkeae</i> could not be applied to any of the collections examined, as none had a lamprotrichoderm pileipellis. <i>Lactifluus clarkeae</i> var. <i>aurantioruber</i> is raised to species level, and six new species are described, three in subg. <i>Lactifluus</i>: <i>Lf. jetiae</i>, <i>Lf. pagodicystidiatus</i>, and <i>Lf. rugulostipitatus</i>, and three in subg. <i>Gymnocarpi: Lf. albens</i>, <i>Lf. psammophilus</i>, and <i>Lf. pseudoflocktoniae</i>. A new collection of <i>Lf. russulisporus</i> provides a significant range extension for the species. Untangling this complex will enable better identification of species and increase understanding of diversity and specific habitat associations of macrofungi. <b>Citation</b>: Lebel T, Douch J, Tegart L, et al. 2021. Untangling the Lactifluus clarkeae - Lf. flocktoniae (Russulaceae) species complex in Australasia. Persoonia 47: 1-44. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.01.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139730290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-01Epub Date: 2021-12-24DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.06
P W Crous, E R Osieck, Ž Jurjević, J Boers, A L van Iperen, M Starink-Willemse, B Dima, S Balashov, T S Bulgakov, P R Johnston, O V Morozova, U Pinruan, S Sommai, P Alvarado, C A Decock, T Lebel, S McMullan-Fisher, G Moreno, R G Shivas, L Zhao, J Abdollahzadeh, M Abrinbana, D V Ageev, G Akhmetova, A V Alexandrova, A Altés, A G G Amaral, C Angelini, V Antonín, F Arenas, P Asselman, F Badali, A Baghela, A Bañares, R W Barreto, I G Baseia, J-M Bellanger, A Berraf-Tebbal, A Yu Biketova, N V Bukharova, T I Burgess, J Cabero, M P S Câmara, J F Cano-Lira, P Ceryngier, R Chávez, D A Cowan, A F de Lima, R L Oliveira, S Denman, Q N Dang, F Dovana, I G Duarte, A Eichmeier, A Erhard, F Esteve-Raventós, A Fellin, G Ferisin, R J Ferreira, A Ferrer, P Finy, E Gaya, A D W Geering, C Gil-Durán, K Glässnerová, A M Glushakova, D Gramaje, F E Guard, A L Guarnizo, D Haelewaters, R E Halling, R Hill, Y Hirooka, V Hubka, V A Iliushin, D D Ivanova, N E Ivanushkina, P Jangsantear, A Justo, A V Kachalkin, S Kato, P Khamsuntorn, I Y Kirtsideli, D G Knapp, G A Kochkina, O Koukol, G M Kovács, J Kruse, T K A Kumar, I Kušan, T Læssøe, E Larsson, R Lebeuf, G Levicán, M Loizides, P Marinho, J J Luangsa-Ard, E G Lukina, V Magaña-Dueñas, G Maggs-Kölling, E F Malysheva, V F Malysheva, B Martín, M P Martín, N Matočec, A R McTaggart, M Mehrabi-Koushki, A Mešić, A N Miller, P Mironova, P-A Moreau, A Morte, K Müller, L G Nagy, S Nanu, A Navarro-Ródenas, W J Nel, T H Nguyen, T F Nóbrega, M E Noordeloos, I Olariaga, B E Overton, S M Ozerskaya, P Palani, F Pancorbo, V Papp, J Pawłowska, T Q Pham, C Phosri, E S Popov, A Portugal, A Pošta, K Reschke, M Reul, G M Ricci, A Rodríguez, J Romanowski, N Ruchikachorn, I Saar, A Safi, B Sakolrak, F Salzmann, M Sandoval-Denis, E Sangwichein, L Sanhueza, T Sato, A Sastoque, B Senn-Irlet, A Shibata, K Siepe, S Somrithipol, M Spetik, P Sridhar, A M Stchigel, K Stuskova, N Suwannasai, Y P Tan, R Thangavel, I Tiago, S Tiwari, Z Tkalčec, M A Tomashevskaya, C Tonegawa, H X Tran, N T Tran, J Trovão, V E Trubitsyn, J Van Wyk, W A S Vieira, J Vila, C M Visagie, A Vizzini, S V Volobuev, D T Vu, N Wangsawat, T Yaguchi, E Ercole, B W Ferreira, A P de Souza, B S Vieira, J Z Groenewald
Novel species of fungi described in this study include those from various countries as follows: Antartica, Cladosporium austrolitorale from coastal sea sand. Australia, Austroboletus yourkae on soil, Crepidotusinnuopurpureus on dead wood, Curvularia stenotaphri from roots and leaves of Stenotaphrum secundatum and Thecaphora stajsicii from capsules of Oxalis radicosa.Belgium, Paraxerochrysium coryli (incl. Paraxerochrysium gen. nov.) from Corylus avellana.Brazil, Calvatia nordestina on soil, Didymella tabebuiicola from leaf spots on Tabebuia aurea, Fusarium subflagellisporum from hypertrophied floral and vegetative branches of Mangifera indica and Microdochium maculosum from living leaves of Digitaria insularis.Canada, Cuphophyllus bondii from a grassland. Croatia, Mollisia inferiseptata from a rotten Laurus nobilis trunk. Cyprus, Amanita exilis on calcareous soil. Czech Republic, Cytospora hippophaicola from wood of symptomatic Vaccinium corymbosum.Denmark, Lasiosphaeria deviata on pieces of wood and herbaceous debris. Dominican Republic, Calocybella goethei among grass on a lawn. France (Corsica), Inocybe corsica on wet ground. France (French Guiana), Trechispora patawaensis on decayed branch of unknown angiosperm tree and Trechispora subregularis on decayed log of unknown angiosperm tree. Germany, Paramicrotheciumsambuci (incl. Paramicrothecium gen. nov.) on dead stems of Sambucus nigra.India, Aureobasidium microtermitis from the gut of a Microtermes sp. termite, Laccaria diospyricola on soil and Phylloporia tamilnadensis on branches of Catunaregam spinosa. Iran, Pythium serotinoosporum from soil under Prunus dulcis.Italy, Pluteus brunneovenosus on twigs of broadleaved trees on the ground. Japan, Heterophoma rehmanniae on leaves of Rehmannia glutinosa f. hueichingensis.Kazakhstan, Murispora kazachstanica from healthy roots of Triticum aestivum.Namibia, Caespitomoniumeuphorbiae (incl. Caespitomonium gen. nov.) from stems of an Euphorbia sp. Netherlands, Alfaria junci, Myrmecridium junci, Myrmecridium juncicola, Myrmecridium juncigenum, Ophioceras junci, Paradinemasporium junci (incl. Paradinemasporium gen. nov.), Phialoseptomonium junci, Sporidesmiella juncicola, Xenopyriculariajunci and Zaanenomyces quadripartis (incl. Zaanenomyces gen. nov.), from dead culms of Juncus effusus, Cylindromonium everniae and Rhodoveronaea everniae from Evernia prunastri, Cyphellophora sambuci and Myrmecridiu
{"title":"Fungal Planet description sheets: 1284-1382.","authors":"P W Crous, E R Osieck, Ž Jurjević, J Boers, A L van Iperen, M Starink-Willemse, B Dima, S Balashov, T S Bulgakov, P R Johnston, O V Morozova, U Pinruan, S Sommai, P Alvarado, C A Decock, T Lebel, S McMullan-Fisher, G Moreno, R G Shivas, L Zhao, J Abdollahzadeh, M Abrinbana, D V Ageev, G Akhmetova, A V Alexandrova, A Altés, A G G Amaral, C Angelini, V Antonín, F Arenas, P Asselman, F Badali, A Baghela, A Bañares, R W Barreto, I G Baseia, J-M Bellanger, A Berraf-Tebbal, A Yu Biketova, N V Bukharova, T I Burgess, J Cabero, M P S Câmara, J F Cano-Lira, P Ceryngier, R Chávez, D A Cowan, A F de Lima, R L Oliveira, S Denman, Q N Dang, F Dovana, I G Duarte, A Eichmeier, A Erhard, F Esteve-Raventós, A Fellin, G Ferisin, R J Ferreira, A Ferrer, P Finy, E Gaya, A D W Geering, C Gil-Durán, K Glässnerová, A M Glushakova, D Gramaje, F E Guard, A L Guarnizo, D Haelewaters, R E Halling, R Hill, Y Hirooka, V Hubka, V A Iliushin, D D Ivanova, N E Ivanushkina, P Jangsantear, A Justo, A V Kachalkin, S Kato, P Khamsuntorn, I Y Kirtsideli, D G Knapp, G A Kochkina, O Koukol, G M Kovács, J Kruse, T K A Kumar, I Kušan, T Læssøe, E Larsson, R Lebeuf, G Levicán, M Loizides, P Marinho, J J Luangsa-Ard, E G Lukina, V Magaña-Dueñas, G Maggs-Kölling, E F Malysheva, V F Malysheva, B Martín, M P Martín, N Matočec, A R McTaggart, M Mehrabi-Koushki, A Mešić, A N Miller, P Mironova, P-A Moreau, A Morte, K Müller, L G Nagy, S Nanu, A Navarro-Ródenas, W J Nel, T H Nguyen, T F Nóbrega, M E Noordeloos, I Olariaga, B E Overton, S M Ozerskaya, P Palani, F Pancorbo, V Papp, J Pawłowska, T Q Pham, C Phosri, E S Popov, A Portugal, A Pošta, K Reschke, M Reul, G M Ricci, A Rodríguez, J Romanowski, N Ruchikachorn, I Saar, A Safi, B Sakolrak, F Salzmann, M Sandoval-Denis, E Sangwichein, L Sanhueza, T Sato, A Sastoque, B Senn-Irlet, A Shibata, K Siepe, S Somrithipol, M Spetik, P Sridhar, A M Stchigel, K Stuskova, N Suwannasai, Y P Tan, R Thangavel, I Tiago, S Tiwari, Z Tkalčec, M A Tomashevskaya, C Tonegawa, H X Tran, N T Tran, J Trovão, V E Trubitsyn, J Van Wyk, W A S Vieira, J Vila, C M Visagie, A Vizzini, S V Volobuev, D T Vu, N Wangsawat, T Yaguchi, E Ercole, B W Ferreira, A P de Souza, B S Vieira, J Z Groenewald","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.06","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.06","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Novel species of fungi described in this study include those from various countries as follows: <b>Antartica</b>, <i>Cladosporium austrolitorale</i> from coastal sea sand. <b>Australia</b>, <i>Austroboletus yourkae</i> on soil, <i>Crepidotus</i> <i>innuopurpureus</i> on dead wood, <i>Curvularia stenotaphri</i> from roots and leaves of <i>Stenotaphrum secundatum</i> and <i>Thecaphora stajsicii</i> from capsules of <i>Oxalis radicosa.</i> <b>Belgium</b>, <i>Paraxerochrysium coryli</i> (incl. <i>Paraxerochrysium</i> gen. nov.) from <i>Corylus avellana.</i> <b>Brazil</b>, <i>Calvatia nordestina</i> on soil, <i>Didymella tabebuiicola</i> from leaf spots on <i>Tabebuia aurea, Fusarium subflagellisporum</i> from hypertrophied floral and vegetative branches of <i>Mangifera indica</i> and <i>Microdochium maculosum</i> from living leaves of <i>Digitaria insularis.</i> <b>Canada</b>, <i>Cuphophyllus bondii</i> from a grassland. <b>Croatia</b>, <i>Mollisia inferiseptata</i> from a rotten <i>Laurus nobilis</i> trunk. <b>Cyprus</b>, <i>Amanita exilis</i> on calcareous soil. <b>Czech Republic</b>, <i>Cytospora hippophaicola</i> from wood of symptomatic <i>Vaccinium corymbosum.</i> <b>Denmark</b>, <i>Lasiosphaeria deviata</i> on pieces of wood and herbaceous debris. <b>Dominican Republic</b>, <i>Calocybella goethei</i> among grass on a lawn. <b>France (Corsica)</b>, <i>Inocybe corsica</i> on wet ground. <b>France (French Guiana)</b>, <i>Trechispora patawaensis</i> on decayed branch of unknown angiosperm tree and <i>Trechispora subregularis</i> on decayed log of unknown angiosperm tree. <b>Germany</b>, <i>Paramicrothecium</i> <i>sambuci</i> (incl. <i>Paramicrothecium</i> gen. nov.) on dead stems of <i>Sambucus nigra.</i> <b>India</b>, <i>Aureobasidium microtermitis</i> from the gut of a <i>Microtermes</i> sp. termite, <i>Laccaria diospyricola</i> on soil and <i>Phylloporia tamilnadensis</i> on branches of <i>Catunaregam spinosa</i>. <b>Iran</b>, <i>Pythium serotinoosporum</i> from soil under <i>Prunus dulcis.</i> <b>Italy</b>, <i>Pluteus brunneovenosus</i> on twigs of broadleaved trees on the ground. <b>Japan</b>, <i>Heterophoma rehmanniae</i> on leaves of <i>Rehmannia glutinosa</i> f. <i>hueichingensis.</i> <b>Kazakhstan</b>, <i>Murispora kazachstanica</i> from healthy roots of <i>Triticum aestivum.</i> <b>Namibia</b>, <i>Caespitomonium</i> <i>euphorbiae</i> (incl. <i>Caespitomonium</i> gen. nov.) from stems of an <i>Euphorbia</i> sp. <b>Netherlands</b>, <i>Alfaria junci, Myrmecridium junci, Myrmecridium juncicola, Myrmecridium juncigenum, Ophioceras junci, Paradinemasporium junci</i> (incl. <i>Paradinemasporium</i> gen. nov.), <i>Phialoseptomonium junci, Sporidesmiella juncicola, Xenopyricularia</i> <i>junci</i> and <i>Zaanenomyces quadripartis</i> (incl. <i>Zaanenomyces</i> gen. nov.), from dead culms of <i>Juncus effusus, Cylindromonium everniae</i> and <i>Rhodoveronaea everniae</i> from <i>Evernia prunastri, Cyphellophora sambuci</i> and <i>Myrmecridiu","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139730239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-01Epub Date: 2021-09-13DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.03
X E Xiao, W Wang, P W Crous, H K Wang, C Jiao, F Huang, Z X Pu, Z R Zhu, H Y Li
Citrus is an important and widely cultivated fruit crop in South China. Although the species of fungal diseases of leaves and fruits have been extensively studied, the causal organisms of branch diseases remain poorly known in China. Species of Botryosphaeriaceae are known as important fungal pathogens causing branch diseases on citrus in the USA and Europe. To determine the diversity of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with citrus branch diseases in China, surveys were conducted in the major citrus-producing areas from 2017 to 2020. Diseased tissues were collected from twigs, branches and trunks with a range of symptoms including cankers, cracking, dieback and gummosis. Based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic comparison of the DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), the translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (tef1), the β-tubulin gene (tub2) and the DNA-directed RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2), 111 isolates from nine provinces were identified as 18 species of Botryosphaeriaceae, including Botryosphaeria dothidea, B. fabicerciana, Diplodia seriata, Dothiorella alpina, Do. plurivora, Lasiodiplodia citricola, L. iraniensis, L. microconidia, L. pseudotheobromae, L. theobromae, Neodeightonia subglobosa, Neofusicoccum parvum, and six previously undescribed species, namely Do. citrimurcotticola, L.guilinensis, L. huangyanensis, L. linhaiensis, L. ponkanicola and Sphaeropsis linhaiensis spp. nov. Botryosphaeria dothidea (28.8 %) was the most abundant species, followed by L. pseudotheobromae (23.4 %), which was the most widely distributed species on citrus, occurring in six of the nine provinces sampled. Pathogenicity tests indicated that all 18 species of Botryosphaeriaceae obtained from diseased citrus tissues in this study were pathogenic to the tested Citrus reticulata shoots in vitro, while not all species are pathogenic to the tested Cocktail grapefruit (C. paradisi × C. reticulata) shoots in vivo. In addition, Lasiodiplodia was the most aggressive genus both in vitro and in vivo. This is the first study to identify Botryosphaeriaceae species related to citrus branch diseases in China and the results provide a theoretical basis for the implementation of prevention and control measures. Citation: Xiao XE, Wang W, Crous PW, et al. 2021. Species of Botryosphaeriaceae associated with citrus branch diseases in China. Persoonia 47: 106-135. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03.
柑橘是华南地区广泛种植的重要水果作物。虽然对柑橘叶片和果实的真菌病害种类进行了广泛研究，但对柑橘枝干病害的病原菌却知之甚少。众所周知，在美国和欧洲，Botryosphaeriaceae 的物种是导致柑橘枝干病害的重要真菌病原体。为确定与中国柑橘枝干病害相关的 Botryosphaeriaceae 物种的多样性，2017 年至 2020 年在柑橘主产区进行了调查。从树枝、枝条和树干上采集了病害组织，病害症状包括腐烂病、开裂病、枯死病和胶冻病。根据形态特征以及内部转录间隔区（ITS）、翻译伸长因子 1-α基因（tef1）、β-微管蛋白基因（tub2）和 DNA 引导的 RNA 聚合酶 II 第二大亚基（rpb2）的 DNA 序列的系统发育比较，来自 9 个省的 111 个分离物被鉴定为 18 种 Botryosphaeriaceae，包括 Botryosphaeria dothidea、B.plurivora、Lasiodiplodia citricola、L. iraniensis、L. microconidia、L. pseudotheobromae、L.thobromae、Neodeightonia subglobosa、Neofusicoccum parvum，以及 6 个以前未曾描述过的种，即 Do. citrimurcotticola、L. guilinensis、L. huangyanensis、L. linhaiensis、L. ponkanicola 和 Sphaeropsis linhaiensis spp.在柑橘上分布最广的物种是 L. pseudotheobromae（23.4%），它在取样的 9 个省中的 6 个省都有分布。致病性测试表明，本研究中从病柑橘组织中获得的所有 18 个 Botryosphaeriaceae 物种在体外均对受测的网纹柑橘嫩枝具有致病性，但并非所有物种在体内均对受测的鸡尾柚（C. paradisi × C. reticulata）嫩枝具有致病性。此外，Lasiodiplodia 在体外和体内都是最具侵袭性的属。这是我国首次鉴定与柑橘枝干病害相关的Botryosphaeriaceae物种，其结果为实施防控措施提供了理论依据。引用：Xiao XE, Wang W, Crous PW, et al.与中国柑橘枝干病害相关的 Botryosphaeriaceae 物种.Persoonia 47: 106-135. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03.
{"title":"Species of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> associated with citrus branch diseases in China.","authors":"X E Xiao, W Wang, P W Crous, H K Wang, C Jiao, F Huang, Z X Pu, Z R Zhu, H Y Li","doi":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.03","DOIUrl":"10.3767/persoonia.2023.47.03","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Citrus is an important and widely cultivated fruit crop in South China. Although the species of fungal diseases of leaves and fruits have been extensively studied, the causal organisms of branch diseases remain poorly known in China. Species of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> are known as important fungal pathogens causing branch diseases on citrus in the USA and Europe. To determine the diversity of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> species associated with citrus branch diseases in China, surveys were conducted in the major citrus-producing areas from 2017 to 2020. Diseased tissues were collected from twigs, branches and trunks with a range of symptoms including cankers, cracking, dieback and gummosis. Based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic comparison of the DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), the translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (<i>tef1</i>), the β-tubulin gene (<i>tub2</i>) and the DNA-directed RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (<i>rpb2</i>), 111 isolates from nine provinces were identified as 18 species of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i>, including <i>Botryosphaeria dothidea</i>, <i>B. fabicerciana</i>, <i>Diplodia seriata</i>, <i>Dothiorella alpina</i>, <i>Do. plurivora</i>, <i>Lasiodiplodia citricola</i>, <i>L. iraniensis</i>, <i>L. microconidia</i>, <i>L. pseudotheobromae</i>, <i>L. theobromae</i>, <i>Neodeightonia subglobosa</i>, <i>Neofusicoccum parvum</i>, and six previously undescribed species, namely <i>Do. citrimurcotticola</i>, <i>L.</i> <i>guilinensis</i>, <i>L. huangyanensis</i>, <i>L. linhaiensis</i>, <i>L. ponkanicola</i> and <i>Sphaeropsis linhaiensis</i> spp. nov. <i>Botryosphaeria dothidea</i> (28.8 %) was the most abundant species, followed by <i>L. pseudotheobromae</i> (23.4 %), which was the most widely distributed species on citrus, occurring in six of the nine provinces sampled. Pathogenicity tests indicated that all 18 species of <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> obtained from diseased citrus tissues in this study were pathogenic to the tested <i>Citrus reticulata</i> shoots <i>in vitro</i>, while not all species are pathogenic to the tested Cocktail grapefruit (<i>C. paradisi</i> × <i>C. reticulata</i>) shoots <i>in vivo</i>. In addition, <i>Lasiodiplodia</i> was the most aggressive genus both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. This is the first study to identify <i>Botryosphaeriaceae</i> species related to citrus branch diseases in China and the results provide a theoretical basis for the implementation of prevention and control measures. <b>Citation</b>: Xiao XE, Wang W, Crous PW, et al. 2021. Species of Botryosphaeriaceae associated with citrus branch diseases in China. Persoonia 47: 106-135. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139730241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号