首页 > 最新文献

Psychological bulletin最新文献

英文 中文
Pervasive failure to report properties of visual stimuli in experimental research in psychology and neuroscience: Two metascientific studies. 心理学和神经科学实验研究中普遍未能报告视觉刺激的特性:两项元科学研究。
IF 22.4 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000399
Zhicheng Lin, Qimin Ma, Xiaolin Huang, Xuebing Wu, Yang Zhang
{"title":"Pervasive failure to report properties of visual stimuli in experimental research in psychology and neuroscience: Two metascientific studies.","authors":"Zhicheng Lin, Qimin Ma, Xiaolin Huang, Xuebing Wu, Yang Zhang","doi":"10.1037/bul0000399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000399","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45838531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The conspiratorial mind: A meta-analytic review of motivational and personological correlates. 阴谋心理:动机与人格相关的元分析回顾。
IF 22.4 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000392
Shauna M Bowes, Thomas H Costello, Arber Tasimi

A tidal wave of research has tried to uncover the motivational and personological correlates of conspiratorial ideation, often studying these two classes of correlates in parallel. Here, we synthesize this vast and piecemeal literature through a multilevel meta-analytic review that spanned 170 studies, 257 samples, 52 variables, 1,429 effect sizes, and 158,473 participants. Overall, we found that the strongest correlates of conspiratorial ideation pertained to (a) perceiving danger and threat, (b) relying on intuition and having odd beliefs and experiences, and (c) being antagonistic and acting superior. Considerable heterogeneity was found within these relations--especially when individual variables were lumped together under a single domain--and we identified potential boundary conditions in these relations (e.g., type of conspiracy). Given that the psychological correlates of conspiratorial ideation have often been classified as belonging to one of two broad domains-motivation or personality-we aim to understand the implications of such heterogeneity for frameworks of conspiratorial ideation. We conclude with directions for future research that can lead to a unified account of conspiratorial ideation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

一股研究浪潮试图揭示阴谋思想的动机和人格关联,通常是并行研究这两类关联。在这里,我们通过一个多层次的荟萃分析综述,包括170项研究,257个样本,52个变量,1429个效应量,158,473名参与者,综合了这些庞大而零碎的文献。总的来说,我们发现阴谋思想的最强相关性与(a)感知危险和威胁,(b)依赖直觉,有奇怪的信仰和经验,以及(c)敌对和表现优越。在这些关系中发现了相当大的异质性——特别是当单个变量被集中在一个域中时——我们确定了这些关系中的潜在边界条件(例如,阴谋类型)。考虑到阴谋思想的心理关联通常被归类为属于两大领域——动机或人格——我们的目标是理解这种异质性对阴谋思想框架的影响。我们总结了未来研究的方向,可以导致阴谋思想的统一说明。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The conspiratorial mind: A meta-analytic review of motivational and personological correlates.","authors":"Shauna M Bowes,&nbsp;Thomas H Costello,&nbsp;Arber Tasimi","doi":"10.1037/bul0000392","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A tidal wave of research has tried to uncover the motivational and personological correlates of conspiratorial ideation, often studying these two classes of correlates in parallel. Here, we synthesize this vast and piecemeal literature through a multilevel meta-analytic review that spanned 170 studies, 257 samples, 52 variables, 1,429 effect sizes, and 158,473 participants. Overall, we found that the strongest correlates of conspiratorial ideation pertained to (a) perceiving danger and threat, (b) relying on intuition and having odd beliefs and experiences, and (c) being antagonistic and acting superior. Considerable heterogeneity was found within these relations--especially when individual variables were lumped together under a single domain--and we identified potential boundary conditions in these relations (e.g., type of conspiracy). Given that the psychological correlates of conspiratorial ideation have often been classified as belonging to one of two broad domains-motivation or personality-we aim to understand the implications of such heterogeneity for frameworks of conspiratorial ideation. We conclude with directions for future research that can lead to a unified account of conspiratorial ideation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9776164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Child maltreatment and alexithymia: A meta-analytic review. 儿童虐待与述情障碍:元分析综述。
IF 22.4 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000391
Julia Ditzer, Eileen Y Wong, Rhea N Modi, Maciej Behnke, James J Gross, Anat Talmon

Alexithymia refers to difficulties identifying and describing one's emotions. Growing evidence suggests that alexithymia is a key transdiagnostic risk factor. Despite its clinical importance, the etiology of alexithymia is largely unknown. The present study employs meta-analytic methods to summarize findings on the role of one hypothesized antecedent of adult alexithymia, namely child maltreatment. We obtained effect size estimates from 99 independent samples reported in 78 unique sources that reported both child maltreatment history and adult levels of alexithymia. These studies involved a total of 36,141 participants. Using correlation coefficients as our effect size index, we found that child maltreatment was positively related to overall adult alexithymia (r = .23 [.19, .27]). Notably, emotional abuse (r = .18 [.13, .23]), emotional neglect (r = .21 [.16, .26]), and physical neglect (r = .18 [.15, .22]) were the strongest predictors. Effects were moderated by gender, affiliation with clinical versus nonclinical samples, and publication status. Overall results were robust to publication bias and the presence of outliers. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the complex connection between different types of child maltreatment and alexithymia, providing greater insight into the early environmental influences on alexithymia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

述情障碍是指难以识别和描述自己的情绪。越来越多的证据表明述情障碍是一个关键的跨诊断风险因素。尽管述情障碍具有重要的临床意义,但其病因在很大程度上是未知的。本研究采用元分析方法总结了成人述情障碍的一个假设先行因素,即儿童虐待的作用。我们从78个独特来源的99个独立样本中获得了效应大小估计,这些样本报告了儿童虐待史和成人述情障碍水平。这些研究共涉及36141名参与者。使用相关系数作为我们的效应大小指数,我们发现儿童虐待与整体成人述情障碍呈正相关(r=.23[.19,.27])。值得注意的是,情绪虐待(r=.18[.13,.23])、情绪忽视(r=.21[.16,.26])和身体忽视(r=.18[15,.22])是最强的预测因素。影响受性别、与临床样本和非临床样本的关系以及发表状态的影响。总体结果对发表偏倚和异常值的存在具有稳健性。这些发现有助于更细致地理解不同类型的儿童虐待和述情障碍之间的复杂联系,从而更深入地了解早期环境对述情障碍的影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Child maltreatment and alexithymia: A meta-analytic review.","authors":"Julia Ditzer,&nbsp;Eileen Y Wong,&nbsp;Rhea N Modi,&nbsp;Maciej Behnke,&nbsp;James J Gross,&nbsp;Anat Talmon","doi":"10.1037/bul0000391","DOIUrl":"10.1037/bul0000391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alexithymia refers to difficulties identifying and describing one's emotions. Growing evidence suggests that alexithymia is a key transdiagnostic risk factor. Despite its clinical importance, the etiology of alexithymia is largely unknown. The present study employs meta-analytic methods to summarize findings on the role of one hypothesized antecedent of adult alexithymia, namely child maltreatment. We obtained effect size estimates from 99 independent samples reported in 78 unique sources that reported both child maltreatment history and adult levels of alexithymia. These studies involved a total of 36,141 participants. Using correlation coefficients as our effect size index, we found that child maltreatment was positively related to overall adult alexithymia (<i>r</i> = .23 [.19, .27]). Notably, emotional abuse (<i>r</i> = .18 [.13, .23]), emotional neglect (<i>r</i> = .21 [.16, .26]), and physical neglect (<i>r</i> = .18 [.15, .22]) were the strongest predictors. Effects were moderated by gender, affiliation with clinical versus nonclinical samples, and publication status. Overall results were robust to publication bias and the presence of outliers. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the complex connection between different types of child maltreatment and alexithymia, providing greater insight into the early environmental influences on alexithymia. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9878027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Knowing before doing: Review and mega-analysis of action understanding in prereaching infants. 先知后做:对学前教育婴儿动作理解的回顾和大型分析。
IF 22.4 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-29 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000393
Shari Liu, Melyssa Almeida

The relationship between experience and knowledge is one of the oldest and deepest questions in psychology. In developmental science, research on this question has focused on prereaching infants who cannot yet retrieve objects by reaching for and grasping them. Over the past 2 decades, behavioral research in this population has produced two seemingly contradictory findings: After first-person experience with reaching via "sticky mittens" training, (a) infants come to expect that people reach efficiently, toward goal objects, but (b) under some conditions, they can express these expectations without training. We hypothesize that prereaching infants' understanding of other people's actions is driven by the representational demands of the tasks used to test their abilities, rather than by first-person motor experience per se. We conducted a qualitative review and a quantitative, preregistered "mega-analysis" of the original data from this past work (i.e., an analysis of looking responses from N = 650 infants, 30 conditions, and 8 articles). We found that the manipulations with the strongest effects (measured via effect sizes and Bayes factors) on infants' understanding of other people's goals and physical constraints, controlling for infant age, were abstract features of action: Whether the action produced an observable effect in the world on contact and provided unambiguous evidence for the actor's goal. We end by presenting a broad hypothesis about how young infants learn about other people's minds and actions, centered on an early intuitive theory of action planning, to be tested with future work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

经验和知识之间的关系是心理学中最古老、最深刻的问题之一。在发展科学中,对这个问题的研究集中在那些还不能通过伸手和抓住物体来取回物体的预教育婴儿身上。在过去的20年里,对这一人群的行为研究产生了两个看似矛盾的发现:在第一人称体验到通过“粘性手套”训练达到目的后,(a)婴儿开始期望人们能够有效地达到目标物体,但(b)在某些条件下,他们可以在没有训练的情况下表达这些期望。我们假设,幼儿对他人行为的理解是由用于测试其能力的任务的代表性需求驱动的,而不是由第一人称运动体验本身驱动的,对过去工作中的原始数据进行预先注册的“大型分析”(即,对650名婴儿、30种情况和8篇文章的视觉反应进行分析)。我们发现,在控制婴儿年龄的情况下,对婴儿理解他人目标和身体约束具有最强影响(通过效应大小和贝叶斯因子测量)的操作是行为的抽象特征:该行为是否在世界上对接触产生了可观察的影响,并为行为者的目标提供了明确的证据。最后,我们提出了一个关于婴儿如何了解他人思想和行为的广泛假设,以早期的行动计划直觉理论为中心,并在未来的工作中进行测试。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Knowing before doing: Review and mega-analysis of action understanding in prereaching infants.","authors":"Shari Liu, Melyssa Almeida","doi":"10.1037/bul0000393","DOIUrl":"10.1037/bul0000393","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between experience and knowledge is one of the oldest and deepest questions in psychology. In developmental science, research on this question has focused on prereaching infants who cannot yet retrieve objects by reaching for and grasping them. Over the past 2 decades, behavioral research in this population has produced two seemingly contradictory findings: After first-person experience with reaching via \"sticky mittens\" training, (a) infants come to expect that people reach efficiently, toward goal objects, but (b) under some conditions, they can express these expectations without training. We hypothesize that prereaching infants' understanding of other people's actions is driven by the representational demands of the tasks used to test their abilities, rather than by first-person motor experience per se. We conducted a qualitative review and a quantitative, preregistered \"mega-analysis\" of the original data from this past work (i.e., an analysis of looking responses from <i>N</i> = 650 infants, 30 conditions, and 8 articles). We found that the manipulations with the strongest effects (measured via effect sizes and Bayes factors) on infants' understanding of other people's goals and physical constraints, controlling for infant age, were abstract features of action: Whether the action produced an observable effect in the world on contact and provided unambiguous evidence for the actor's goal. We end by presenting a broad hypothesis about how young infants learn about other people's minds and actions, centered on an early intuitive theory of action planning, to be tested with future work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9881449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The vicious cycle of psychopathology and stressful life events: A meta-analytic review testing the stress generation model. 精神病理学和压力生活事件的恶性循环:一项测试压力产生模型的元分析综述。
IF 22.4 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000390
Katerina Rnic, Angela C Santee, Jennifer-Ashley Hoffmeister, Hallie Liu, Katharine K Chang, Rachel X Chen, Richard W J Neufeld, Daniel A Machado, Lisa R Starr, David J A Dozois, Joelle LeMoult

Stress generation theory initially posited that depression elevates risk for some stressful events (i.e., dependent events) but not others (i.e., independent events). This preregistered meta-analytic review examined whether stress generation occurs transdiagnostically by examining 95 longitudinal studies with 38,228 participants (537 total effect sizes) from over 30 years of research. Our multilevel meta-analyses found evidence of stress generation across a broad range of psychopathology, as evidenced by significantly larger prospective effects for dependent (overall psychopathology: r = .23) than independent (overall psychopathology: r = .10) stress. We also identified unique patterns of effects across specific types of psychopathology. For example, effects were larger for depression than anxiety. Furthermore, effects were sometimes larger in studies with younger participants, shorter time lags between assessments, checklist measures of stress, and for interpersonal stressors. Finally, a multilevel meta-analytic structural equation model suggested that dependent stress exacerbates psychopathology symptoms over time (β = .04), possibly contributing to chronicity. Interventions targeting the prevention of stress generation may mitigate chronic psychopathology. Conclusions of this study are limited by the predominance of depression effect sizes in the literature and our review of only English language articles. On the other hand, the findings are strengthened by rigorous inclusion criteria, lack of publication bias, and absence of moderating effects by publication year. The latter underscores the replicability of the stress generation effect over the last 30 years. Taken together, the review provides robust evidence that stress generation is a cross-diagnostic phenomenon that contributes to a vicious cycle of increasing stress and psychopathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

压力产生理论最初认为,抑郁症会增加一些压力事件(即依赖性事件)的风险,但不会增加其他事件(即独立性事件)。这篇预先注册的荟萃分析综述通过检查来自30多年研究的95项纵向研究,对38228名参与者(537个总效应大小)进行了研究,检验了压力产生是否通过跨诊断方式发生。我们的多层次荟萃分析发现,在广泛的精神病理学中存在压力产生的证据,依赖性(整体精神病理学:r=.23)压力的预期影响明显大于独立性(整体精神病学:r=.10)压力。我们还确定了特定类型精神病理学的独特影响模式。例如,抑郁的影响大于焦虑。此外,在年轻参与者、评估之间的时间滞后更短、压力清单测量以及人际压力源的研究中,影响有时更大。最后,一个多水平元分析结构方程模型表明,随着时间的推移,依赖性压力会加剧精神病理学症状(β=0.04),可能导致慢性病。针对预防压力产生的干预措施可以缓解慢性精神病理学。这项研究的结论受到文献中抑郁效应大小占主导地位以及我们仅对英语文章的综述的限制。另一方面,严格的纳入标准、缺乏出版偏见以及缺乏按出版年份划分的调节效应加强了研究结果。后者强调了过去30年压力产生效应的可复制性。总之,这篇综述提供了强有力的证据,证明压力的产生是一种交叉诊断现象,会导致压力和精神病理学的恶性循环。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"The vicious cycle of psychopathology and stressful life events: A meta-analytic review testing the stress generation model.","authors":"Katerina Rnic,&nbsp;Angela C Santee,&nbsp;Jennifer-Ashley Hoffmeister,&nbsp;Hallie Liu,&nbsp;Katharine K Chang,&nbsp;Rachel X Chen,&nbsp;Richard W J Neufeld,&nbsp;Daniel A Machado,&nbsp;Lisa R Starr,&nbsp;David J A Dozois,&nbsp;Joelle LeMoult","doi":"10.1037/bul0000390","DOIUrl":"10.1037/bul0000390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stress generation theory initially posited that depression elevates risk for some stressful events (i.e., dependent events) but not others (i.e., independent events). This preregistered meta-analytic review examined whether stress generation occurs transdiagnostically by examining 95 longitudinal studies with 38,228 participants (537 total effect sizes) from over 30 years of research. Our multilevel meta-analyses found evidence of stress generation across a broad range of psychopathology, as evidenced by significantly larger prospective effects for dependent (overall psychopathology: <i>r</i> = .23) than independent (overall psychopathology: <i>r</i> = .10) stress. We also identified unique patterns of effects across specific types of psychopathology. For example, effects were larger for depression than anxiety. Furthermore, effects were sometimes larger in studies with younger participants, shorter time lags between assessments, checklist measures of stress, and for interpersonal stressors. Finally, a multilevel meta-analytic structural equation model suggested that dependent stress exacerbates psychopathology symptoms over time (β = .04), possibly contributing to chronicity. Interventions targeting the prevention of stress generation may mitigate chronic psychopathology. Conclusions of this study are limited by the predominance of depression effect sizes in the literature and our review of only English language articles. On the other hand, the findings are strengthened by rigorous inclusion criteria, lack of publication bias, and absence of moderating effects by publication year. The latter underscores the replicability of the stress generation effect over the last 30 years. Taken together, the review provides robust evidence that stress generation is a cross-diagnostic phenomenon that contributes to a vicious cycle of increasing stress and psychopathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9883490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
What is meant by “growth mindset”? Current theory, measurement practices, and empirical results leave much open to interpretation: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023). 什么是“成长心态”?当前的理论、测量实践和经验结果有很多可供解释的地方:对Macnamara和Burgoyne(2023)以及Burnette等人(2023年)的评论。
IF 22.4 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000370
Veronica X. Yan, Brendan A. Schuetze
{"title":"What is meant by “growth mindset”? Current theory, measurement practices, and empirical results leave much open to interpretation: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023).","authors":"Veronica X. Yan, Brendan A. Schuetze","doi":"10.1037/bul0000370","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000370","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41273227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Culturally fluent theories, metascience, and scientific progress: A case example: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023). 文化流畅的理论、元科学和科学进步:一个案例:对Macnamara和Burgoyne(2023)以及Burnette等人(2023年)的评论。
IF 22.4 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000376
D. Oyserman
{"title":"Culturally fluent theories, metascience, and scientific progress: A case example: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023).","authors":"D. Oyserman","doi":"10.1037/bul0000376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000376","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45800688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
A spotlight on bias in the growth mindset intervention literature: A reply to commentaries that contextualize the discussion (Oyserman, 2023; Yan & Schuetze, 2023) and illustrate the conclusion (Tipton et al., 2023). 关注成长心态干预文献中的偏见:对将讨论置于背景下的评论的回复(Oyserman, 2023;燕,Schuetze, 2023)并说明结论(Tipton et al., 2023)。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000394
Brooke N. Macnamara, Alexander P. Burgoyne
Two meta-analyses examined the effects of growth mindset interventions. Burnette et al. (2023) tested two moderators and found that effects ranged from negative to positive. We (Macnamara & Burgoyne, 2023) tested 11 preregistered moderators and examined the evidence according to a well-de fi ned set of best practices. We found major areas of concern in the growth mindset intervention literature. For instance, 94% of growth mindsetinterventionsincludedconfounds, authorswith aknown fi nancialincentivewere twoand a half times as likely to report positive effects, and higher quality studies were less likely to demonstrate a bene fi t. Yan and Schuetze (2023) contextualized these fi ndings by describing problems with mindset theory and its measurement. Likewise, Oyserman (2023) discussed how growth mindset is a culturally fl uent idea; papers supportive of growth mindset are widely embraced, whereas papers taking a skeptical approach are challenged.Inanothercommentary, Tiptonetal.(2023)challengedourresults,claimingtoproducepositive effects byreanalyzingourdata setusingBurnetteet al. ’ s (2023)approach.However,inadditiontochanging the approach, Tipton et al. changed effect sizes, how moderators were coded, and which studies were included, often without explanation. Though we appreciate the discussion of multiple meta-analytic approaches, we contend that meta-analytic decisions should be a priori, transparently reported, and consistently applied. Tipton et al. ’ s analysis illustrated our (Macnamara & Burgoyne ’ s, 2023) conclusion: Apparent effects of growth mindset interventions on academic achievement may be attributable to inadequate study design, reporting fl aws, and bias.
{"title":"A spotlight on bias in the growth mindset intervention literature: A reply to commentaries that contextualize the discussion (Oyserman, 2023; Yan &amp; Schuetze, 2023) and illustrate the conclusion (Tipton et al., 2023).","authors":"Brooke N. Macnamara, Alexander P. Burgoyne","doi":"10.1037/bul0000394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000394","url":null,"abstract":"Two meta-analyses examined the effects of growth mindset interventions. Burnette et al. (2023) tested two moderators and found that effects ranged from negative to positive. We (Macnamara & Burgoyne, 2023) tested 11 preregistered moderators and examined the evidence according to a well-de fi ned set of best practices. We found major areas of concern in the growth mindset intervention literature. For instance, 94% of growth mindsetinterventionsincludedconfounds, authorswith aknown fi nancialincentivewere twoand a half times as likely to report positive effects, and higher quality studies were less likely to demonstrate a bene fi t. Yan and Schuetze (2023) contextualized these fi ndings by describing problems with mindset theory and its measurement. Likewise, Oyserman (2023) discussed how growth mindset is a culturally fl uent idea; papers supportive of growth mindset are widely embraced, whereas papers taking a skeptical approach are challenged.Inanothercommentary, Tiptonetal.(2023)challengedourresults,claimingtoproducepositive effects byreanalyzingourdata setusingBurnetteet al. ’ s (2023)approach.However,inadditiontochanging the approach, Tipton et al. changed effect sizes, how moderators were coded, and which studies were included, often without explanation. Though we appreciate the discussion of multiple meta-analytic approaches, we contend that meta-analytic decisions should be a priori, transparently reported, and consistently applied. Tipton et al. ’ s analysis illustrated our (Macnamara & Burgoyne ’ s, 2023) conclusion: Apparent effects of growth mindset interventions on academic achievement may be attributable to inadequate study design, reporting fl aws, and bias.","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135469514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why Meta-Analyses of Growth Mindset and Other Interventions Should Follow Best Practices for Examining Heterogeneity: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023). 为什么生长心态的元分析和其他干预措施应该遵循检查异质性的最佳实践:对Macnamara和Burgoyne(2023)以及Burnette等人(2023年)的评论。
IF 17.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000384
Elizabeth Tipton, Christopher Bryan, Jared Murray, Mark McDaniel, Barbara Schneider, David S Yeager

Meta-analysts often ask a yes-or-no question: Is there an intervention effect or not? This traditional, all-or-nothing thinking stands in contrast with current best practice in meta-analysis, which calls for a heterogeneity-attuned approach (i.e., focused on the extent to which effects vary across procedures, participant groups, or contexts). This heterogeneity-attuned approach allows researchers to understand where effects are weaker or stronger and reveals mechanisms. The current article builds on a rare opportunity to compare two recent meta-analyses that examined the same literature (growth mindset interventions) but used different methods and reached different conclusions. One meta-analysis used a traditional approach (Macnamara and Burgoyne, in press), which aggregated effect sizes for each study before combining them and examined moderators one-by-one by splitting the data into small subgroups. The second meta-analysis (Burnette et al., in press) modeled the variation of effects within studies-across subgroups and outcomes-and applied modern, multi-level meta-regression methods. The former concluded that growth mindset effects are biased, but the latter yielded nuanced conclusions consistent with theoretical predictions. We explain why the practices followed by the latter meta-analysis were more in line with best practices for analyzing large and heterogeneous literatures. Further, an exploratory re-analysis of the data showed that applying the modern, heterogeneity-attuned methods from Burnette et al. (in press) to the dataset employed by Macnamara and Burgoyne (in press) confirmed Burnette et al.'s conclusions; namely, that there was a meaningful, significant effect of growth mindset in focal (at-risk) groups. This article concludes that heterogeneity-attuned meta-analysis is important both for advancing theory and for avoiding the boom-or-bust cycle that plagues too much of psychological science.

Meta分析师经常会问一个是或否的问题:是否有干预效果?这种传统的要么全有要么全无的思维与当前荟萃分析的最佳实践形成了鲜明对比,后者要求采用异质性协调的方法(即,关注不同程序、参与者群体或背景的影响差异程度)。这种异质性协调的方法使研究人员能够了解哪些影响较弱或较强,并揭示其机制。当前的文章建立在一个难得的机会上,比较了最近的两项荟萃分析,这两项分析检查了相同的文献(成长心态干预),但使用了不同的方法,得出了不同的结论。一项荟萃分析使用了一种传统的方法(Macnamara和Burgoyne,出版中),在将每项研究合并之前,对其影响大小进行汇总,并通过将数据划分为小组来逐一检查调节因子。第二项荟萃分析(Burnette等人,出版中)模拟了研究中各亚组和结果的影响变化,并应用了现代多层次元回归方法。前者得出的结论是增长心态效应是有偏见的,但后者得出的结论与理论预测一致。我们解释了为什么后一项荟萃分析所遵循的实践更符合分析大型和异质文献的最佳实践。此外,对数据的探索性重新分析表明,将Burnett等人(出版中)的现代、异质性协调方法应用于Macnamara和Burgoyne(出版中的)使用的数据集,证实了Burnette等人的结论;即,在重点(风险)群体中,成长心态产生了有意义的显著影响。这篇文章的结论是,异质性协调的荟萃分析对于推进理论和避免困扰太多心理科学的繁荣或萧条周期都很重要。
{"title":"Why Meta-Analyses of Growth Mindset and Other Interventions Should Follow Best Practices for Examining Heterogeneity: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023).","authors":"Elizabeth Tipton, Christopher Bryan, Jared Murray, Mark McDaniel, Barbara Schneider, David S Yeager","doi":"10.1037/bul0000384","DOIUrl":"10.1037/bul0000384","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meta-analysts often ask a yes-or-no question: Is there an intervention effect or not? This traditional, all-or-nothing thinking stands in contrast with current best practice in meta-analysis, which calls for a heterogeneity-attuned approach (i.e., focused on the extent to which effects vary across procedures, participant groups, or contexts). This heterogeneity-attuned approach allows researchers to understand where effects are weaker or stronger and reveals mechanisms. The current article builds on a rare opportunity to compare two recent meta-analyses that examined the same literature (growth mindset interventions) but used different methods and reached different conclusions. One meta-analysis used a traditional approach (Macnamara and Burgoyne, in press), which aggregated effect sizes for each study before combining them and examined moderators one-by-one by splitting the data into small subgroups. The second meta-analysis (Burnette et al., in press) modeled the variation of effects within studies-across subgroups and outcomes-and applied modern, multi-level meta-regression methods. The former concluded that growth mindset effects are biased, but the latter yielded nuanced conclusions consistent with theoretical predictions. We explain why the practices followed by the latter meta-analysis were more in line with best practices for analyzing large and heterogeneous literatures. Further, an exploratory re-analysis of the data showed that applying the modern, heterogeneity-attuned methods from Burnette et al. (in press) to the dataset employed by Macnamara and Burgoyne (in press) confirmed Burnette et al.'s conclusions; namely, that there was a meaningful, significant effect of growth mindset in focal (at-risk) groups. This article concludes that heterogeneity-attuned meta-analysis is important both for advancing theory and for avoiding the boom-or-bust cycle that plagues too much of psychological science.</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":17.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495100/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10261929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for A Spotlight on Bias in the Growth Mindset Intervention Literature: A Reply to Commentaries That Contextualize the Discussion (Oyserman, 2023; Yan & Schuetze, 2023) and Illustrate the Conclusion (Tipton et al., 2023) 聚焦成长心态干预文献中的偏见的补充材料:对将讨论情境化的评论的回复(Oyserman,2023;Yan和Schuetze,2023)和说明结论(Tipton et al.,2023
IF 22.4 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1037/bul0000394.supp
B. Macnamara, Alexander P. Burgoyne
{"title":"Supplemental Material for A Spotlight on Bias in the Growth Mindset Intervention Literature: A Reply to Commentaries That Contextualize the Discussion (Oyserman, 2023; Yan & Schuetze, 2023) and Illustrate the Conclusion (Tipton et al., 2023)","authors":"B. Macnamara, Alexander P. Burgoyne","doi":"10.1037/bul0000394.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000394.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43920854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychological bulletin
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1