Regenerative medicine最新文献

Aim: Given that astragaloside-IV (As-IV) has the ability to promote osteogenic differentiation, its mechanism is worthy of exploration. Methods: The effect of As-IV on rat tibial defects was examined by histopathological staining and MiR-CT scan. The alkaline phosphatase (ALP) content, osteogenic differentiation-related gene expressions, and mineralized nodule formation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were detected. Results: As-IV repaired tibial defects of rats. As-IV or neuromedin receptor 2 (NMUR2) overexpression elevated ALP content, mineralized nodules, osteogenic differentiation-related genes, β-catenin and NMUR2 levels, the effects of which were reversed by NMUR2 silencing or Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors. Conclusion: As-IV regulates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway through NMUR2 to promote the repair of tibial defects in rats and the differentiation of BMSCs into osteoblasts.

A variety of intra-articular injections are used for the management of osteoarthritis. A rare complication of intra-articular injections is acute pseudoseptic arthritis, which mimics true septic arthritis. To the authors knowledge, pseudosepsis has not been reported as a complication after platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections. We present a case report of pseudoseptic arthritis resulting in acute postinjection pain and a joint effusion after an intra-articular PRP injection into the knee. Clinically, pseudosepsis can occur after PRP treatment with significantly elevated white blood cell counts in the synovial fluid, and should be a consideration in cases of post-PRP injection flares.

Aim: To develop a simple clinical decision rule (CDR) to identify people with knee osteoarthritis who are likely or unlikely to benefit from bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injection. Materials & methods: A total of 92 people with clinical and radiographic evidence of refractory knee osteoarthritis received a single intra-articular (IA) BMAC injection. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine which combination of risk factors predicted BMAC responsiveness. A responder was defined as a person whose knee pain improved more than 15% from baseline 6 months post procedure. Results: The CDR demonstrated that those with lower pain levels, or high pain levels with previous surgery, could be predicted to benefit from a single IA BMAC injection. Conclusion: A simple CDR containing three variables predicted responsiveness to a single IA knee BMAC injection with high accuracy. Further validation of the CDR is required prior to routine use in clinical practice.

Aim: We aimed to expound upon previous research examining the effect of platelet rich plasma in the treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction and pain. Materials & methods: A systematic review was employed in conjunction with a pooled analysis of the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in SIJ dysfunction and pain. Results: A total of 259 articles were retrieved following database systematic review. As a result, four clinical trials and two case studies were subjected to full text appraisal. The dates of publication ranged from 2015 to 2022. Conclusion: Although a unique modality, there is not enough evidence to support the employment of PRP injections over current steroid standard of care. Further double-blinded, randomized control trials are required to elucidate PRP role in SIJ dysfunction.

Abnormal craniofacial bone fusion can lead to the generation of several congenital malformations such as cleft palate, craniosynostosis and craniofacial skeletal hypoplasia, which physically and mentally affect patients. Conventional approaches for the treatment of craniofacial malformations such as the transplantation of autologous bone grafts are not completely efficient and usually, patients suffer from various complications. In line with these statements, the advent of novel therapeutic approaches in human medicine is mandatory. Regarding the extent, size and severity of the bone malformation, supplementation and release of oxygen molecules into the affected sites are critical issues for successful osteogenesis. Here, tissue engineering modalities associated with oxygen supplementation and novel approaches associated with hydrogel synthesis were highlighted in terms of craniofacial malformations.

Aim: We evaluated the bone repair induced by MSCs from adipose tissue (AT-MSCs) and bone marrow (BM-MSCs) injected into rat calvarial defects at two time points. Methods & results: Both cell populations expressed MSC surface markers and differentiated into adipocytes and osteoblasts. μCT showed that the combination of cells from distinct sources exhibited synergistic effects to increase bone repair with an advantage when BM-MSCs were injected prior to AT-MSCs. The higher osteogenic potential of these MSC combinations was demonstrated using an in vitro coculture system where BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs association induced higher ALP activity in MC3T3-E1 cells. Conclusion: Our findings may drive new approaches to treat bone defects and shed light on the complexity of the mechanisms involved in bone regeneration.

Julie G Allickson, PhD, is the Michael S and Mary Sue Shannon Family Director of Mayo Clinic's Center for Regenerative Biotherapeutics at Mayo Clinic (Minnesota, Florida and Arizona) and the Otto Bremer Trust Director, Biomanufacturing and Product Development, Center for Regenerative Biotherapeutics. With over 25 years of experience in regenerative medicine, cellular therapies and regulatory affairs, Dr Allickson leads the center as it pivots toward biomanufacturing, ensuring that discoveries are successful for clinical translation and eventually commercialization. The center is in the process of building their industry experienced team on all pillars of biomanufacturing to support clinical and principal investigators at the Mayo Clinic.

Aim: To evaluate the clinical response to augmenting ultrasound-guided tenotomy (USGT) with an amniotic membrane (AM) allograft injection. Design: Retrospective study. Materials & methods: Subjects underwent either a USGT (N = 16) or a combined USGT plus AM injection (N = 14). Results: Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in pain from baseline starting after 2 weeks in the USGT plus AM group (p = 0.036) and after 8 weeks in the USGT group (p = 0.021). The reduction in pain was sustained for the entire duration of the study (52 weeks). There was no significant difference in pain levels at 26- or 52-week follow-up or patient satisfaction between the two groups. Conclusion: USGT with or without AM allograft injections results in a significant reduction in pain with high patient satisfaction.

Latest developments in the field of stem cell research and regenerative medicine compiled from publicly available information and press releases from non-academic institutions in January 2023.