Brendon E. Boudinot, Martin Fikáček, Ziv E. Lieberman, Dominik Kusy, Ladislav Bocak, Duane D. Mckenna, Rolf Georg Beutel
Systematic bias is one of the major phylogenetic issues arising over the last two decades. Using methods designed to reduce compositional and rate heterogeneity, hence systematic bias, Cai and co-workers (2022) (= CEA22) reanalyzed the DNA sequence dataset for Coleoptera of Zhang et al. (2018) (= ZEA). CEA22 suggest that their phylogenetic results and major evolutionary hypotheses about the Coleoptera should be favoured over other recently published studies. Here, we discuss the methodology of CEA22 with particular attention to how their perfunctory reanalysis of ZEA obfuscates rather than illuminates beetle phylogeny. Similar to published rebuttals of an earlier study of theirs, we specifically find that many of their claims are misleading, unsupported, or false. Critically, CEA22 fail to establish the stated premise for their reanalysis. They fail to demonstrate how composition or rate heterogeneity supposedly impacted the phylogeny estimate of ZEA, let alone the results of other recent studies. Moreover, despite their claim of comprehensive sampling of Coleoptera, their dataset is neither the most diverse with respect to species and higher taxa included, nor anywhere near the largest in terms of sequence data and sampled loci. Although CEA22 does contribute additional fossils for calibration, those seeking the best available estimate for Coleoptera phylogeny and evolution based on molecular data are advised to look elsewhere.
{"title":"Systematic bias and the phylogeny of Coleoptera—A response to Cai et al. (2022) following the responses to Cai et al. (2020)","authors":"Brendon E. Boudinot, Martin Fikáček, Ziv E. Lieberman, Dominik Kusy, Ladislav Bocak, Duane D. Mckenna, Rolf Georg Beutel","doi":"10.1111/syen.12570","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12570","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Systematic bias is one of the major phylogenetic issues arising over the last two decades. Using methods designed to reduce compositional and rate heterogeneity, hence systematic bias, Cai and co-workers (2022) (= CEA22) reanalyzed the DNA sequence dataset for Coleoptera of Zhang et al. (2018) (= ZEA). CEA22 suggest that their phylogenetic results and major evolutionary hypotheses about the Coleoptera should be favoured over other recently published studies. Here, we discuss the methodology of CEA22 with particular attention to how their perfunctory reanalysis of ZEA obfuscates rather than illuminates beetle phylogeny. Similar to published rebuttals of an earlier study of theirs, we specifically find that many of their claims are misleading, unsupported, or false. Critically, CEA22 fail to establish the stated premise for their reanalysis. They fail to demonstrate how composition or rate heterogeneity supposedly impacted the phylogeny estimate of ZEA, let alone the results of other recent studies. Moreover, despite their claim of comprehensive sampling of Coleoptera, their dataset is neither the most diverse with respect to species and higher taxa included, nor anywhere near the largest in terms of sequence data and sampled loci. Although CEA22 does contribute additional fossils for calibration, those seeking the best available estimate for Coleoptera phylogeny and evolution based on molecular data are advised to look elsewhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"48 2","pages":"223-232"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44026410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ximo Mengual, Christoph Mayer, Trevor O. Burt, Kevin M. Moran, Lars Dietz, Gaby Nottebrock, Thomas Pauli, Andrew D. Young, Marie V. Brasseur, Sandra Kukowka, Scott Kelso, Claudia Etzbauer, Sander Bot, Martin Hauser, Kurt Jordaens, Gil F. G. Miranda, Gunilla Ståhls, Wouter van Steenis, Ralph S. Peters, Jeffrey H. Skevington
Flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) are one of the most species-rich dipteran families and provide important ecosystem services such as pollination, biological control of pests, recycling of organic matter and redistributions of essential nutrients. Flower fly adults generally feed on pollen and nectar, but their larval feeding habits are strikingly diverse. In the present study, high-throughput sequencing was used to capture and enrich phylogenetically and evolutionary informative exonic regions. With the help of the baitfisher software, we developed a new bait kit (SYRPHIDAE1.0) to target 1945 CDS regions belonging to 1312 orthologous genes. This new bait kit was successfully used to exon capture the targeted loci in 121 flower fly species across the different subfamilies of Syrphidae. We analysed different amino acid and nucleotide data sets (1302 loci and 154 loci) with maximum likelihood and multispecies coalescent models. Our analyses yielded highly supported similar topologies, although the degree of the SRH (global stationarity, reversibility and homogeneity) conditions varied greatly between amino acid and nucleotide data sets. The sisterhood of subfamilies Pipizinae and Syrphinae is supported in all our analyses, confirming a common origin of taxa feeding on soft-bodied arthropods. Based on our results, we define Syrphini stat.rev. to include the genera Toxomerus and Paragus. Our divergence estimate analyses with beast inferred the origin of the Syrphidae in the Lower Cretaceous (125.5–98.5 Ma) and the diversification of predatory flower flies around the K–Pg boundary (70.61–54.4 Ma), coinciding with the rise and diversification of their prey.
{"title":"Systematics and evolution of predatory flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on exon-capture sequencing","authors":"Ximo Mengual, Christoph Mayer, Trevor O. Burt, Kevin M. Moran, Lars Dietz, Gaby Nottebrock, Thomas Pauli, Andrew D. Young, Marie V. Brasseur, Sandra Kukowka, Scott Kelso, Claudia Etzbauer, Sander Bot, Martin Hauser, Kurt Jordaens, Gil F. G. Miranda, Gunilla Ståhls, Wouter van Steenis, Ralph S. Peters, Jeffrey H. Skevington","doi":"10.1111/syen.12573","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12573","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) are one of the most species-rich dipteran families and provide important ecosystem services such as pollination, biological control of pests, recycling of organic matter and redistributions of essential nutrients. Flower fly adults generally feed on pollen and nectar, but their larval feeding habits are strikingly diverse. In the present study, high-throughput sequencing was used to capture and enrich phylogenetically and evolutionary informative exonic regions. With the help of the <span>baitfisher</span> software, we developed a new bait kit (SYRPHIDAE1.0) to target 1945 CDS regions belonging to 1312 orthologous genes. This new bait kit was successfully used to exon capture the targeted loci in 121 flower fly species across the different subfamilies of Syrphidae. We analysed different amino acid and nucleotide data sets (1302 loci and 154 loci) with maximum likelihood and multispecies coalescent models. Our analyses yielded highly supported similar topologies, although the degree of the SRH (global stationarity, reversibility and homogeneity) conditions varied greatly between amino acid and nucleotide data sets. The sisterhood of subfamilies Pipizinae and Syrphinae is supported in all our analyses, confirming a common origin of taxa feeding on soft-bodied arthropods. Based on our results, we define Syrphini <b>stat.rev.</b> to include the genera <i>Toxomerus</i> and <i>Paragus</i>. Our divergence estimate analyses with <span>beast</span> inferred the origin of the Syrphidae in the Lower Cretaceous (125.5–98.5 Ma) and the diversification of predatory flower flies around the K–Pg boundary (70.61–54.4 Ma), coinciding with the rise and diversification of their prey.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"48 2","pages":"250-277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12573","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47821569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The genus Nomuraelmis Satô, 1964 was synonymized with the genus Stenelmis Dufour, 1835 in the article. As a result, the monotypic species Nomuraelmis amamiensis Satô, 1964 was transferred to the genus Stenelmis and the combination Stenelmis amamiensis (Satô, 1964) was made. However, this name was preoccupied by Stenelmis amamiensis Nomura, 1957 (now Ordobrevia amamiensis). After the publication of the article, the displacement name Stenelmis amami Yoshitomi et Hayashi, 2021 was proposed by Yoshitomi & Hayashi (2021) for the secondary junior homonym Stenelmis amamiensis (Satô, 1964).
{"title":"Kobayashi, T., Hayashi, M., Kamite, Y. & Sota, T. (2021) Molecular phylogeny of Elmidae (Coleoptera: Byrrhoidea) with a focus on Japanese species: Implications for intrafamilial classification. Systematic Entomology, 46, 870–886.","authors":"Takuya Kobayashi, M. Hayashi, Y. Kamite, T. Sota","doi":"10.1111/syen.12549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12549","url":null,"abstract":"The genus Nomuraelmis Satô, 1964 was synonymized with the genus Stenelmis Dufour, 1835 in the article. As a result, the monotypic species Nomuraelmis amamiensis Satô, 1964 was transferred to the genus Stenelmis and the combination Stenelmis amamiensis (Satô, 1964) was made. However, this name was preoccupied by Stenelmis amamiensis Nomura, 1957 (now Ordobrevia amamiensis). After the publication of the article, the displacement name Stenelmis amami Yoshitomi et Hayashi, 2021 was proposed by Yoshitomi & Hayashi (2021) for the secondary junior homonym Stenelmis amamiensis (Satô, 1964).","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42170383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tomasz Wilhelm Pyrcz, Dorota Lachowska-Cierlik, Keith Richard Willmott, Artur Mrozek, Oscar Mahecha-Jiménez, Christer Fåhraeus, Pierre Boyer, Sebastián Martín, Marianne Espeland
A new genus of Neotropical Satyrinae butterflies, Viloriodes Pyrcz & Espeland gen. n. is described in the Pedaliodes Butler complex comprising 11–13 genera and more than 400 species. Support for the new genus is provided by a phylogenetic analysis based on target enrichment (TE) data including 618 nuclear loci with a total of 248,940 nucleotides, and the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI). Five species, whose DNA sequences were obtained by TE during this study, form a strongly supported clade sister to the large clade comprising Pedaliodes and four other genera. Complementary COI analysis confirms the monophyly of Viloriodes gen. n., with the above five plus eight other species clustering in highly supported clades in both Bayesian Inference and Maximum Likelihood analyses, and a TE + COI concatenated tree. Based on molecular and morphological data, 30 species are assigned to Viloriodes gen. n. The new genus can be recognized by a set of subtle morphological characteristics of colour patterns and male and female genitalia. An analysis of divergence times indicates that Viloriodes gen. n. and Steromapedaliodes Forster separated around 5.9 Mya. Viloriodes gen. n. has a wider geographic distribution than any other genus of the Pedaliodes complex, being found from central Mexico to northern Argentina and to the Guyana Shield, typically occurring at lower elevations than Pedaliodes.
{"title":"A new genus in the diverse Andean Pedaliodes complex uncovered using target enrichment (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae)","authors":"Tomasz Wilhelm Pyrcz, Dorota Lachowska-Cierlik, Keith Richard Willmott, Artur Mrozek, Oscar Mahecha-Jiménez, Christer Fåhraeus, Pierre Boyer, Sebastián Martín, Marianne Espeland","doi":"10.1111/syen.12568","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12568","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A new genus of Neotropical Satyrinae butterflies, <i>Viloriodes</i> Pyrcz & Espeland gen. n. is described in the <i>Pedaliodes</i> Butler complex comprising 11–13 genera and more than 400 species. Support for the new genus is provided by a phylogenetic analysis based on target enrichment (TE) data including 618 nuclear loci with a total of 248,940 nucleotides, and the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI). Five species, whose DNA sequences were obtained by TE during this study, form a strongly supported clade sister to the large clade comprising <i>Pedaliodes</i> and four other genera. Complementary COI analysis confirms the monophyly of <i>Viloriodes</i> gen. n., with the above five plus eight other species clustering in highly supported clades in both Bayesian Inference and Maximum Likelihood analyses, and a TE + COI concatenated tree. Based on molecular and morphological data, 30 species are assigned to <i>Viloriodes</i> gen. n. The new genus can be recognized by a set of subtle morphological characteristics of colour patterns and male and female genitalia. An analysis of divergence times indicates that <i>Viloriodes</i> gen. n. and <i>Steromapedaliodes</i> Forster separated around 5.9 Mya. <i>Viloriodes</i> gen. n. has a wider geographic distribution than any other genus of the <i>Pedaliodes</i> complex, being found from central Mexico to northern Argentina and to the Guyana Shield, typically occurring at lower elevations than <i>Pedaliodes</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"48 1","pages":"163-177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46916103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jing-Li Xuan, Sonja J. Scheffer, Owen Lonsdale, Brian K. Cassel, Matthew L. Lewis, Charles S. Eiseman, Wan-Xue Liu, Brian M. Wiegmann
The genus Liriomyza Mik (Diptera: Agromyzidae) is a diverse and globally distributed group of acalyptrate flies. Phylogenetic relationships among Liriomyza species have remained incompletely investigated and have never been fully addressed using molecular data. Here, we reconstruct the phylogeny of the genus Liriomyza using various phylogenetic methods (maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and gene tree coalescence) on target-capture-based phylogenomic datasets (nucleotides and amino acids) obtained from anchored hybrid enrichment (AHE). We have recovered tree topologies that are nearly congruent across all data types and methods, and individual clade support is strong across all phylogenetic analyses. Moreover, defined morphological species groups and clades are well-supported in our best estimates of the molecular phylogeny. Liriomyza violivora (Spencer) is a sister group to all remaining sampled Liriomyza species, and the well-known polyphagous vegetable pests [L. huidobrensis (Blanchard), L. langei Frick, L. bryoniae. (Kaltenbach), L. trifolii (Burgess), L. sativae Blanchard, and L. brassicae (Riley)]. belong to multiple clades that are not particularly closely related on the trees. Often, closely related Liriomyza species feed on distantly related host plants. We reject the hypothesis that cophylogenetic processes between Liriomyza species and their host plants drive diversification in this genus. Instead, Liriomyza exhibits a widespread pattern of major host shifts across plant taxa. Our new phylogenetic estimate for Liriomyza species provides considerable new information on the evolution of host-use patterns in this genus. In addition, it provides a framework for further study of the morphology, ecology, and diversification of these important flies.
密蝇属(双翅目:密蝇科)是一种分布于世界各地的蝇类。Liriomyza物种之间的系统发育关系尚未完全研究,并且从未使用分子数据完全解决。在这里,我们使用各种系统发育方法(最大似然、贝叶斯推理和基因树聚结)对锚定杂交富集(AHE)获得的基于目标捕获的系统发育数据集(核苷酸和氨基酸)重建了Liriomyza属的系统发育。我们已经恢复了在所有数据类型和方法中几乎一致的树拓扑结构,并且在所有系统发育分析中对单个分支的支持都很强。此外,在我们对分子系统发育的最佳估计中,已定义的形态学物种群和分支得到了很好的支持。Liriomyza violivora (Spencer)是所有剩余Liriomyza物种的姐妹群,以及众所周知的多食蔬菜害虫[L。布兰查德(Blanchard), L. langei Frick, L. bryoniae。(Kaltenbach)、L. trifolii (Burgess)、L. sativae Blanchard和L. brassicae (Riley)]。属于多个分支,在树上不是特别密切相关。通常,近亲Liriomyza物种以远亲寄主植物为食。我们拒绝了Liriomyza物种和它们的寄主植物之间的共同发育过程驱动该属多样化的假设。相反,Liriomyza在植物分类群中表现出广泛的主要寄主转移模式。我们对Liriomyza物种的新系统发育估计为该属宿主利用模式的进化提供了相当多的新信息。此外,它还为进一步研究这些重要蝇类的形态、生态学和多样性提供了一个框架。
{"title":"A genome-wide phylogeny and the diversification of genus Liriomyza (Diptera: Agromyzidae) inferred from anchored phylogenomics","authors":"Jing-Li Xuan, Sonja J. Scheffer, Owen Lonsdale, Brian K. Cassel, Matthew L. Lewis, Charles S. Eiseman, Wan-Xue Liu, Brian M. Wiegmann","doi":"10.1111/syen.12569","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12569","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The genus <i>Liriomyza</i> Mik (Diptera: Agromyzidae) is a diverse and globally distributed group of acalyptrate flies. Phylogenetic relationships among <i>Liriomyza</i> species have remained incompletely investigated and have never been fully addressed using molecular data. Here, we reconstruct the phylogeny of the genus <i>Liriomyza</i> using various phylogenetic methods (maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and gene tree coalescence) on target-capture-based phylogenomic datasets (nucleotides and amino acids) obtained from anchored hybrid enrichment (AHE). We have recovered tree topologies that are nearly congruent across all data types and methods, and individual clade support is strong across all phylogenetic analyses. Moreover, defined morphological species groups and clades are well-supported in our best estimates of the molecular phylogeny. <i>Liriomyza violivora</i> (Spencer) is a sister group to all remaining sampled <i>Liriomyza</i> species, and the well-known polyphagous vegetable pests [<i>L. huidobrensis</i> (Blanchard), <i>L. langei</i> Frick, <i>L. bryoniae.</i> (Kaltenbach), <i>L. trifolii</i> (Burgess), <i>L. sativae</i> Blanchard, and <i>L. brassicae</i> (Riley)]. belong to multiple clades that are not particularly closely related on the trees. Often, closely related <i>Liriomyza</i> species feed on distantly related host plants. We reject the hypothesis that cophylogenetic processes between <i>Liriomyza</i> species and their host plants drive diversification in this genus. Instead, <i>Liriomyza</i> exhibits a widespread pattern of major host shifts across plant taxa. Our new phylogenetic estimate for <i>Liriomyza</i> species provides considerable new information on the evolution of host-use patterns in this genus. In addition, it provides a framework for further study of the morphology, ecology, and diversification of these important flies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"48 1","pages":"178-197"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12569","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46348039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Rossini, V. Grebennikov, Thomas Merrien, Andreia Miraldo, Heidi Viljanen, S. Tarasov
Paleotropical clades with largely disjunct distributions are ideal models for biogeographic reconstructions. The dung beetle genera Grebennikovius Mlambo, Scholtz & Deschodt, Epactoides Olsouffief and Ochicanthon Vaz‐de‐Mello are distributed in Tanzania, Madagascar and Réunion, and the Oriental region, respectively. We combine morphology and molecular dataset to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships between these taxa. Our analyses corroborate previous hypotheses of monophyly of the group, which is here described as new tribe Epactoidini trib. nov. Grebennikovius is recovered as sister to Epactoides, while Ochicanthon emerges as sister to them both. The disjunct distribution of our focal clade is unusual within the subfamily Scarabaeinae. Bayesian divergence time estimates and ancestral range reconstructions indicate an African origin of the crown group of the tribe Epactoidini trib. nov. in the early mid Eocene, ca. 46 Ma. The divergence between Epactoides and its sister is dated to 32.3 Ma, while the crown age for the genus Ochicanthon is dated to 27 Ma. We investigate the factors that may have shaped the current distribution of the tribe Epactoidini trib. nov. The formation of the Gomphotherium landbridge, along with favourable environmental conditions would have allowed dry‐intolerant organisms, such as Ochicanthon, to disperse out of Africa. Remarkable climatic stability of the Eastern Arc Mountains was critical for the retention of the monotypic genus Grebennikovius. We suggest two subsequent overwater dispersal events: the migration of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Epactoides from Africa to Madagascar (32.3–29.5 Ma); the lately dispersal of the MRCA of the today's extinct Epactoides giganteus Rossini, Vaz‐de‐Mello & Montreuil to Réunion island from Madagascar (3.4 Ma). We suggest that the high potential of dispersal of Epactoidini trib. nov. dung beetles and the strict association to forest habitat might have triggered two major radiations, one in Madagascar and one in the Oriental Region.
{"title":"Paleogene forest fragmentation and out‐of‐Africa dispersal explain radiation of the Paleotropical dung beetle tribe Epactoidini trib. nov. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae)","authors":"M. Rossini, V. Grebennikov, Thomas Merrien, Andreia Miraldo, Heidi Viljanen, S. Tarasov","doi":"10.1111/syen.12564","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12564","url":null,"abstract":"Paleotropical clades with largely disjunct distributions are ideal models for biogeographic reconstructions. The dung beetle genera Grebennikovius Mlambo, Scholtz & Deschodt, Epactoides Olsouffief and Ochicanthon Vaz‐de‐Mello are distributed in Tanzania, Madagascar and Réunion, and the Oriental region, respectively. We combine morphology and molecular dataset to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships between these taxa. Our analyses corroborate previous hypotheses of monophyly of the group, which is here described as new tribe Epactoidini trib. nov. Grebennikovius is recovered as sister to Epactoides, while Ochicanthon emerges as sister to them both. The disjunct distribution of our focal clade is unusual within the subfamily Scarabaeinae. Bayesian divergence time estimates and ancestral range reconstructions indicate an African origin of the crown group of the tribe Epactoidini trib. nov. in the early mid Eocene, ca. 46 Ma. The divergence between Epactoides and its sister is dated to 32.3 Ma, while the crown age for the genus Ochicanthon is dated to 27 Ma. We investigate the factors that may have shaped the current distribution of the tribe Epactoidini trib. nov. The formation of the Gomphotherium landbridge, along with favourable environmental conditions would have allowed dry‐intolerant organisms, such as Ochicanthon, to disperse out of Africa. Remarkable climatic stability of the Eastern Arc Mountains was critical for the retention of the monotypic genus Grebennikovius. We suggest two subsequent overwater dispersal events: the migration of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Epactoides from Africa to Madagascar (32.3–29.5 Ma); the lately dispersal of the MRCA of the today's extinct Epactoides giganteus Rossini, Vaz‐de‐Mello & Montreuil to Réunion island from Madagascar (3.4 Ma). We suggest that the high potential of dispersal of Epactoidini trib. nov. dung beetles and the strict association to forest habitat might have triggered two major radiations, one in Madagascar and one in the Oriental Region.","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"47 1","pages":"655 - 667"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46907123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ľuboš Hrivniak, P. Sroka, R. Godunko, P. Manko, J. Bojková
The evolution and distribution of mountain biota are closely linked with mountain formation and topographic complexity. Here we explore the diversification of cold‐tolerant mayflies of the subgenus Epeorus (Caucasiron) in the south‐eastern Greater Caucasus, an area of dynamic changes in topography since the Miocene, driven by the convergence of the Greater and Lesser Caucasus. We hypothesized that orogenic processes promoted the diversification of E. (Caucasiron) and that the resultant diversification pattern followed the timing and progress of mountain formation along the range. A new evolutionary lineage of E. (Caucasiron) distributed in the central‐eastern Greater Caucasus was found and described as Epeorus (Caucasiron) tripertitus sp.n. It consists of three clades clearly differentiated based on mitochondrial sequence data, but indistinguishable by morphological traits. Based on a time‐calibrated phylogeny using mitochondrial (COI, 16S) and nuclear (EF, wg, 28S) markers, we found that a gradual allopatric diversification of the ancestral population of E. (C.) tripertitus sp.n. dated to a period lasting from the late Miocene to the Pleistocene spread eastward along the range. This pattern corresponded with the process of topographic deformation which started in the central part of the range in the Miocene and progressed to the east during the Pliocene/Pleistocene. The results implied the dominant role of mountain building on the biotic diversification of this region and continuing recent speciation in the south‐eastern part of the mountains.
{"title":"Diversification in Caucasian Epeorus (Caucasiron) mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae) follows topographic deformation along the Greater Caucasus range","authors":"Ľuboš Hrivniak, P. Sroka, R. Godunko, P. Manko, J. Bojková","doi":"10.1111/syen.12551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12551","url":null,"abstract":"The evolution and distribution of mountain biota are closely linked with mountain formation and topographic complexity. Here we explore the diversification of cold‐tolerant mayflies of the subgenus Epeorus (Caucasiron) in the south‐eastern Greater Caucasus, an area of dynamic changes in topography since the Miocene, driven by the convergence of the Greater and Lesser Caucasus. We hypothesized that orogenic processes promoted the diversification of E. (Caucasiron) and that the resultant diversification pattern followed the timing and progress of mountain formation along the range. A new evolutionary lineage of E. (Caucasiron) distributed in the central‐eastern Greater Caucasus was found and described as Epeorus (Caucasiron) tripertitus sp.n. It consists of three clades clearly differentiated based on mitochondrial sequence data, but indistinguishable by morphological traits. Based on a time‐calibrated phylogeny using mitochondrial (COI, 16S) and nuclear (EF, wg, 28S) markers, we found that a gradual allopatric diversification of the ancestral population of E. (C.) tripertitus sp.n. dated to a period lasting from the late Miocene to the Pleistocene spread eastward along the range. This pattern corresponded with the process of topographic deformation which started in the central part of the range in the Miocene and progressed to the east during the Pliocene/Pleistocene. The results implied the dominant role of mountain building on the biotic diversification of this region and continuing recent speciation in the south‐eastern part of the mountains.","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"47 1","pages":"603 - 617"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42654083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hongqu Tang, Qingqing Cheng, Matt N. Krosch, Peter S. Cranston
Maritime chironomid midges (Diptera) are diverse, yet these ‘pearls of the ocean’ are little known. Emphasizing Pacific Ocean taxa, we used six genetic markers (18S, 28S, CAD1, CAD4, FolCOI and COI) and fossil calibrations to produce Bayesian time-calibrated phylogenies to date eight independent marine transitions in three subfamilies. Deep nodes involve subfamily Telmatogetoninae (originating mid-Cretaceous, 101–128, 114 Ma), with sister genera Telmatogeton Schiner and Thalassomya Schiner splitting later in the Cretaceous (56–82, 69 Ma). Two transitions in Orthocladiinae involve Clunio Haliday and Pseudosmittia Edwards, dating from the upper Cretaceous, both with Eocene crown groups. In subfamily Chironominae, transitions to marine occur in two tribes. Four transitions occur within the otherwise nonmarine crown groups Kiefferulus Goetghebuer, Dicrotendipes Kieffer, Polypedilum Kieffer and Ainuyusurika Sasa & Shirasaka. Two separate robust clades in tribe Tanytarsini involve: (1) a minor radiation within Paratanytarsus dated to the mid-Eocene around 43 Ma; and (2) an unexpected but fully supported diversification in Pontomyia Edwards plus Yaetanytarsus Sasa dated to around 47 Ma, with separation of Pontomyia from Yaetanytarsus around 40 Ma. Crown Pontomyia, represented by three species, was estimated to have diverged around 19 Ma, whereas the crown radiation of Yaetanytarsus, with 12 sampled species, dates to the mid-Eocene. In a comprehensive global review we concisely document new synonymies and new combinations revealed by the study. The evolutionary timing estimate provides insights into the frequency of marine transitions and diversifications in the Chironomidae in association with dynamic oceanic changes during the Oligocene and Miocene.
{"title":"Maritime midge radiations in the Pacific Ocean (Diptera: Chironomidae)","authors":"Hongqu Tang, Qingqing Cheng, Matt N. Krosch, Peter S. Cranston","doi":"10.1111/syen.12565","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12565","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maritime chironomid midges (Diptera) are diverse, yet these ‘pearls of the ocean’ are little known. Emphasizing Pacific Ocean taxa, we used six genetic markers (<i>18S</i>, <i>28S</i>, <i>CAD1</i>, <i>CAD4</i>, <i>FolCOI</i> and <i>COI</i>) and fossil calibrations to produce Bayesian time-calibrated phylogenies to date eight independent marine transitions in three subfamilies. Deep nodes involve subfamily Telmatogetoninae (originating mid-Cretaceous, 101<i>–</i>128, 114 Ma), with sister genera <i>Telmatogeton</i> Schiner and <i>Thalassomya</i> Schiner splitting later in the Cretaceous (56–82, 69 Ma). Two transitions in Orthocladiinae involve <i>Clunio</i> Haliday and <i>Pseudosmittia</i> Edwards, dating from the upper Cretaceous, both with Eocene crown groups. In subfamily Chironominae, transitions to marine occur in two tribes. Four transitions occur within the otherwise nonmarine crown groups <i>Kiefferulus</i> Goetghebuer, <i>Dicrotendipes</i> Kieffer, <i>Polypedilum</i> Kieffer and <i>Ainuyusurika</i> Sasa & Shirasaka. Two separate robust clades in tribe Tanytarsini involve: (1) a minor radiation within <i>Paratanytarsus</i> dated to the mid-Eocene around 43 Ma; and (2) an unexpected but fully supported diversification in <i>Pontomyia</i> Edwards plus <i>Yaetanytarsus</i> Sasa dated to around 47 Ma, with separation of <i>Pontomyia</i> from <i>Yaetanytarsus</i> around 40 Ma. Crown <i>Pontomyia</i>, represented by three species, was estimated to have diverged around 19 Ma, whereas the crown radiation of <i>Yaetanytarsus</i>, with 12 sampled species, dates to the mid-Eocene. In a comprehensive global review we concisely document new synonymies and new combinations revealed by the study. The evolutionary timing estimate provides insights into the frequency of marine transitions and diversifications in the Chironomidae in association with dynamic oceanic changes during the Oligocene and Miocene.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"48 1","pages":"111-126"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12565","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41275627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yanhua Hu, Christopher H. Dietrich, Rachel K. Skinner, Yalin Zhang
The suborder Auchenorrhyncha (“true hoppers”) comprises nearly half of known Hemiptera, with >43,000 known species of sap-sucking herbivores distributed worldwide, including many important agricultural pests and vectors of plant disease. More than half of the known Auchenorrhyncha belong to superfamily Membracoidea (leaf- and treehoppers), which has been a source of phylogenetic contention for many years. To construct an improved backbone phylogeny of this superfamily, we obtained transcriptome data for multiple representatives of all 5 previously established extant families and nearly all subfamilies to test their monophyly and relationships. 138 taxa (132 Membracoidea and 6 outgroups) were sampled with an emphasis on families Cicadellidae and Membracidae, which were paraphyletic as previously defined by most authors, several problematic subfamilies (Aphrodinae, Eurymelinae, Ledrinae, Nicomiinae, Stegaspidinae and Tartessinae). We analysed different combinations of data sets (amino acid, complete nucleotide and degeneracy-coded nucleotide) using different modelling schemes. The resultant trees based on different analyses are congruent in most nodes. Discordant nodes mainly pertain to relationships among cicadellid subfamilies and tribal relationships within Aphrodinae and Eurymelinae. Analyses of gene- and site concordance factors and quartet scores indicate that this instability is largely attributable to an overall lack of informative characters across genes and sites rather than strongly supported conflict among genes. According to the congruent nodes, we make the following revisions: combine Stegaspidinae and Centrotinae into a single subfamily, Centrotinae sensu lato; restore Stenocotini from Tartessinae to its original position in the Ledrinae; and transform Holdgatiella Evans from Nicomiinae to Melizoderinae. In addition, to solve the paraphyly of both Cicadellidae and Membracidae, a preferred option would be to combine all five previously recognized families into a single family, Membracidae sensu lato; the other option could be to render Cicadellidae monophyletic by excluding Megophthalminae and Ulopinae from Cicadellidae and elevating them to status as separate families.
在已知的半翅目中,有近一半的半翅目是“真跳虫”亚目,大约有43,000种已知的吸液食草动物分布在世界各地,包括许多重要的农业害虫和植物病害媒介。超过一半的已知Auchenorrhyncha属于超家族膜总科(叶蝉和树蝉),多年来一直是系统发育争论的来源。为了构建这个超家族的改进的骨干系统发育,我们获得了所有5个先前建立的现存家族和几乎所有亚家族的多个代表的转录组数据,以测试它们的单一性和关系。样本共138个分类群(膜总科132个,外群6个),重点研究了大部分作者所定义的泛颖花科(Cicadellidae)和膜总科(Membracidae),以及几个问题亚科(Aphrodinae、Eurymelinae、Ledrinae、Nicomiinae、Stegaspidinae和Tartessinae)。我们使用不同的建模方案分析了数据集(氨基酸、完整核苷酸和简并编码核苷酸)的不同组合。基于不同分析的结果树在大多数节点上是一致的。不协调节点主要涉及菊科亚科之间的关系,以及阿芙罗丁科和Eurymelinae之间的部落关系。对基因和位点一致性因子和四重奏评分的分析表明,这种不稳定性主要归因于基因和位点间信息特征的总体缺乏,而不是基因之间强烈支持的冲突。根据全等节点,将Stegaspidinae和Centrotinae合并为一个亚科Centrotinae sensu lato;从Tartessinae恢复Stenocotini到Ledrinae的原始位置;并将Holdgatiella Evans从Nicomiinae转化为Melizoderinae。此外,为了解决蝉科和膜科的分类学问题,一个更好的选择是将之前确认的五个科合并为一个科,即膜科;另一种选择是将巨眼科和乌洛皮亚科从蝉科中排除,使其成为独立的科,从而使蝉科成为单系。
{"title":"Phylogeny of Membracoidea (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) based on transcriptome data","authors":"Yanhua Hu, Christopher H. Dietrich, Rachel K. Skinner, Yalin Zhang","doi":"10.1111/syen.12563","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12563","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The suborder Auchenorrhyncha (“true hoppers”) comprises nearly half of known Hemiptera, with >43,000 known species of sap-sucking herbivores distributed worldwide, including many important agricultural pests and vectors of plant disease. More than half of the known Auchenorrhyncha belong to superfamily Membracoidea (leaf- and treehoppers), which has been a source of phylogenetic contention for many years. To construct an improved backbone phylogeny of this superfamily, we obtained transcriptome data for multiple representatives of all 5 previously established extant families and nearly all subfamilies to test their monophyly and relationships. 138 taxa (132 Membracoidea and 6 outgroups) were sampled with an emphasis on families Cicadellidae and Membracidae, which were paraphyletic as previously defined by most authors, several problematic subfamilies (Aphrodinae, Eurymelinae, Ledrinae, Nicomiinae, Stegaspidinae and Tartessinae). We analysed different combinations of data sets (amino acid, complete nucleotide and degeneracy-coded nucleotide) using different modelling schemes. The resultant trees based on different analyses are congruent in most nodes. Discordant nodes mainly pertain to relationships among cicadellid subfamilies and tribal relationships within Aphrodinae and Eurymelinae. Analyses of gene- and site concordance factors and quartet scores indicate that this instability is largely attributable to an overall lack of informative characters across genes and sites rather than strongly supported conflict among genes. According to the congruent nodes, we make the following revisions: combine Stegaspidinae and Centrotinae into a single subfamily, Centrotinae sensu lato; restore Stenocotini from Tartessinae to its original position in the Ledrinae; and transform <i>Holdgatiella</i> Evans from Nicomiinae to Melizoderinae. In addition, to solve the paraphyly of both Cicadellidae and Membracidae, a preferred option would be to combine all five previously recognized families into a single family, Membracidae sensu lato; the other option could be to render Cicadellidae monophyletic by excluding Megophthalminae and Ulopinae from Cicadellidae and elevating them to status as separate families.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"48 1","pages":"97-110"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48692972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}