Yan Lai, Shiyu Du, Hongyu Li, Yuchen Zheng, Adrian Ardila-Camacho, Ulrike Aspöck, Horst Aspöck, Ding Yang, Feng Zhang, Xingyue Liu
Universal Single Copy Orthologs (USCOs), as a set of markers of nearly universal single-copy genes, show a superiority in phylogenomic inference. Here, we developed a Benchmarking Universal Single Copy Orthologs (BUSCOs) dataset, neuropterida_odb10, tailored for Neuropterida, based on high-quality genome assemblies and transcriptome data, comprising 5438 BUSCOs. A range of 1524–5328 complete and single-copy USCOs could be captured from the genome assemblies and transcriptomes of 104 species of Neuropterida. The reconstruction of a higher-level phylogeny of Neuropterida based on a comprehensive sampling and refined genomic data in reference to neuropterida_odb10 validates the efficiency of this BUSCO dataset for phylogenomic inference. We recovered Psychopsidae as the sister group to Ithonidae, and corroborated the sister group relationship between Sisyridae and Nevrorthidae within Osmyloidea and the sister group relationship between Chrysopidae and Mantispoidea. Furthermore, our findings highlight that focusing on alignments with a higher presence of parsimony-informative sites, rather than on the total number of alignments, can diminish errors in gene tree estimation, a process notably vulnerable to error when using multispecies coalescent methods. The neuropterida_odb10 BUSCO reference dataset holds promise for phylogenetic studies at various hierarchical levels, as well as for comparative genomics and the exploration of species diversity within Neuropterida.
通用单拷贝同源物(Universal Single Copy Orthologs, USCOs)作为一组几乎通用的单拷贝基因标记,在系统基因组推断中具有优势。在这里,我们基于高质量的基因组组装和转录组数据,开发了一个为栉翼类量身定制的基准通用单拷贝同源物(BUSCOs)数据集neuropterida_odb10,包含5438个BUSCOs。从104种栉虫的基因组组装和转录组中捕获了1524 ~ 5328个完整的单拷贝USCOs。以neuropterida_odb10为参考,基于全面采样和精细化的基因组数据重建了一个更高层次的神经翼目系统发育,验证了BUSCO数据集在系统发育推断方面的有效性。我们恢复了精神蝗科作为蚁科的姐妹类群,并证实了在蚁科中,精神蝗科与蚁科之间存在姐妹类群关系,而蝶科与螳螂科之间存在姐妹类群关系。此外,我们的研究结果强调,关注具有较高简约性信息位点的比对比对,而不是关注比对比对的总数,可以减少基因树估计中的错误,这是一个在使用多物种聚结方法时特别容易出错的过程。neuropterida_odb10 BUSCO参考数据集有望用于不同层次的系统发育研究,以及比较基因组学和神经翼目物种多样性的探索。
{"title":"Lacewing-specific Universal Single Copy Orthologs designed towards resolution of backbone phylogeny of Neuropterida","authors":"Yan Lai, Shiyu Du, Hongyu Li, Yuchen Zheng, Adrian Ardila-Camacho, Ulrike Aspöck, Horst Aspöck, Ding Yang, Feng Zhang, Xingyue Liu","doi":"10.1111/syen.12657","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12657","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Universal Single Copy Orthologs (USCOs), as a set of markers of nearly universal single-copy genes, show a superiority in phylogenomic inference. Here, we developed a Benchmarking Universal Single Copy Orthologs (BUSCOs) dataset, neuropterida_odb10, tailored for Neuropterida, based on high-quality genome assemblies and transcriptome data, comprising 5438 BUSCOs. A range of 1524–5328 complete and single-copy USCOs could be captured from the genome assemblies and transcriptomes of 104 species of Neuropterida. The reconstruction of a higher-level phylogeny of Neuropterida based on a comprehensive sampling and refined genomic data in reference to neuropterida_odb10 validates the efficiency of this BUSCO dataset for phylogenomic inference. We recovered Psychopsidae as the sister group to Ithonidae, and corroborated the sister group relationship between Sisyridae and Nevrorthidae within Osmyloidea and the sister group relationship between Chrysopidae and Mantispoidea. Furthermore, our findings highlight that focusing on alignments with a higher presence of parsimony-informative sites, rather than on the total number of alignments, can diminish errors in gene tree estimation, a process notably vulnerable to error when using multispecies coalescent methods. The neuropterida_odb10 BUSCO reference dataset holds promise for phylogenetic studies at various hierarchical levels, as well as for comparative genomics and the exploration of species diversity within Neuropterida.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 2","pages":"309-324"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143536118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yanghui Cao, Christopher H. Dietrich, Dmitry A. Dmitriev, Joel H. Kits, Qingquan Xue, Yalin Zhang
Recent phylogenetic analyses of anchored-hybrid, transcriptomic and morphological data have consistently recovered a clade comprising the three previously recognized families of treehoppers (Hemiptera), Aetalionidae, Melizoderidae and Membracidae, as well as two groups traditionally included in the leafhopper family Cicadellidae as subfamilies Megophthalminae and Ulopinae. To reconstruct the phylogeny of these two groups of treehopper-like leafhoppers, maximum likelihood and multi-species coalescent analyses were performed on a molecular DNA dataset consisting of ~700 anchored hybrid loci representing 84 terminal taxa. Analyses based on different dataset subsets and approaches yielded largely congruent topologies, although the relationships among Megophthalminae, Ulopinae and treehoppers are still unstable. The monophyly of both subfamilies is strongly supported, but several tribes, including Agalliini, Cephalelini, Megophthalmini and Ulopini, are recovered as non-monophyletic. The origin of Megophthalminae and Ulopinae was estimated as early Cretaceous (~140 million years ago), and the divergence within each subfamily began in the mid-Cretaceous. Continental-scale biogeographic structure is evident in these two groups, with genera occurring on the same continent tending to group together regardless of tribal placement, suggesting that extensive morphological convergence occurred among faunas inhabiting different regions. Ancestral microhabitat reconstruction suggested that megophthalmine and ulopine leafhoppers originally lived on trees or shrubs and later several groups evolved independently to inhabit leaf litter and soil. Convergent modifications of the ocelli, forewings and hindwings accompanied changes in microhabitat preference.
{"title":"Phylogeny, biogeography and morphological evolution of the treehopper-like leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) Megophthalminae and Ulopinae","authors":"Yanghui Cao, Christopher H. Dietrich, Dmitry A. Dmitriev, Joel H. Kits, Qingquan Xue, Yalin Zhang","doi":"10.1111/syen.12655","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12655","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent phylogenetic analyses of anchored-hybrid, transcriptomic and morphological data have consistently recovered a clade comprising the three previously recognized families of treehoppers (Hemiptera), Aetalionidae, Melizoderidae and Membracidae, as well as two groups traditionally included in the leafhopper family Cicadellidae as subfamilies Megophthalminae and Ulopinae. To reconstruct the phylogeny of these two groups of treehopper-like leafhoppers, maximum likelihood and multi-species coalescent analyses were performed on a molecular DNA dataset consisting of ~700 anchored hybrid loci representing 84 terminal taxa. Analyses based on different dataset subsets and approaches yielded largely congruent topologies, although the relationships among Megophthalminae, Ulopinae and treehoppers are still unstable. The monophyly of both subfamilies is strongly supported, but several tribes, including Agalliini, Cephalelini, Megophthalmini and Ulopini, are recovered as non-monophyletic. The origin of Megophthalminae and Ulopinae was estimated as early Cretaceous (~140 million years ago), and the divergence within each subfamily began in the mid-Cretaceous. Continental-scale biogeographic structure is evident in these two groups, with genera occurring on the same continent tending to group together regardless of tribal placement, suggesting that extensive morphological convergence occurred among faunas inhabiting different regions. Ancestral microhabitat reconstruction suggested that megophthalmine and ulopine leafhoppers originally lived on trees or shrubs and later several groups evolved independently to inhabit leaf litter and soil. Convergent modifications of the ocelli, forewings and hindwings accompanied changes in microhabitat preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 2","pages":"296-308"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12655","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143536091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maxim W. D. Adams, James A. Walker, Harley A. Rose, Braxton R. Jones, Andreas Zwick, Huiming Yang, James Nicholls, Diana Hartley, Stephen Bent, Nicholas Carlile, Ian Hutton, Simon Y. W. Ho, Nathan Lo
The progressive aridification of the Australian continent, and coincident decline of mesic forest, has been a powerful driver of allopatric and environmental speciation in native species. The relictual mesic forests of the eastern seaboard now harbour a diverse group of endemic fauna, including the wood-feeding cockroaches of the genus Panesthia, which reached the continent via two separate invasions from Melanesia. The more recent of these colonization events gave rise to a group of five recognized species, occurring in mainland woodlands, sclerophylls and rainforests, as well as the forests and grasslands of the Lord Howe Island Group. Due to limited sampling in molecular studies and doubt regarding the standing taxonomy, there is little certainty about relationships among the species and poor understanding of the effects of ancient climatic change upon their evolution. We undertook a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of the clade, using complete mitogenomes and nuclear ribosomal markers from nearly all known morphospecies and populations. Our time-calibrated phylogenetic analyses reveal an additional six unrecognized, highly divergent lineages and suggest that these have arisen primarily through vicariance as rainforests fragmented during Plio-Pleistocene glacial cycles (2–5 million years ago). Ancestral niche estimations also evidence a tropical rainforest origin for the group, followed by at least three niche transitions into drier forest, including one associated with the singular colonization of the Lord Howe Island Group. Finally, we find evidence of frequent, parallel wing reduction, in potential association with the contraction of forest habitats into small refugia. Our results reiterate the far-reaching role of ancient aridification in driving speciation, niche expansion and morphological evolution in Australian fauna.
{"title":"Plio-Pleistocene decline of mesic forest underpins diversification in a clade of Australian Panesthia cockroaches","authors":"Maxim W. D. Adams, James A. Walker, Harley A. Rose, Braxton R. Jones, Andreas Zwick, Huiming Yang, James Nicholls, Diana Hartley, Stephen Bent, Nicholas Carlile, Ian Hutton, Simon Y. W. Ho, Nathan Lo","doi":"10.1111/syen.12654","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12654","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The progressive aridification of the Australian continent, and coincident decline of mesic forest, has been a powerful driver of allopatric and environmental speciation in native species. The relictual mesic forests of the eastern seaboard now harbour a diverse group of endemic fauna, including the wood-feeding cockroaches of the genus <i>Panesthia</i>, which reached the continent via two separate invasions from Melanesia. The more recent of these colonization events gave rise to a group of five recognized species, occurring in mainland woodlands, sclerophylls and rainforests, as well as the forests and grasslands of the Lord Howe Island Group. Due to limited sampling in molecular studies and doubt regarding the standing taxonomy, there is little certainty about relationships among the species and poor understanding of the effects of ancient climatic change upon their evolution. We undertook a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of the clade, using complete mitogenomes and nuclear ribosomal markers from nearly all known morphospecies and populations. Our time-calibrated phylogenetic analyses reveal an additional six unrecognized, highly divergent lineages and suggest that these have arisen primarily through vicariance as rainforests fragmented during Plio-Pleistocene glacial cycles (2–5 million years ago). Ancestral niche estimations also evidence a tropical rainforest origin for the group, followed by at least three niche transitions into drier forest, including one associated with the singular colonization of the Lord Howe Island Group. Finally, we find evidence of frequent, parallel wing reduction, in potential association with the contraction of forest habitats into small refugia. Our results reiterate the far-reaching role of ancient aridification in driving speciation, niche expansion and morphological evolution in Australian fauna.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 2","pages":"253-268"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12654","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143535727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Juanita Rodriguez, Michael Frese, Mary Dettmann, Mahin Chavoshi-Jolfaei, John Macdonald
We report the discovery of the first fossil of an Australian species of Pergidae, Baladi warrugen. et sp. n., found at McGraths Flat, a newly discovered Miocene Konservat-Lagerstätte in central New South Wales. Using morphological data from the well-preserved fossil, along with a previously published molecular dataset of 59 taxa and a newly generated molecular dataset for 8 taxa, we constructed a data matrix and generated the first chronogram for Pergidae that incorporates internal calibration points. Our data reveal that Baladi warru belongs to the subfamily Perginae and is closely related to the Australian genera Cerealces and Xyloperga (tribe Cerealcini). According to our analysis, the origin of Pergidae appears slightly younger than previously hypothesised; however, additional calibration points are needed for a more detailed age constraint. Furthermore, ancestral character reconstruction indicates four independent adaptations to toxic Myrtaceae as host plants, while biogeographic analyses suggest that sympatry followed by founder events were the primary processes shaping the current disjunct distribution of pergids. Two significant founder events correspond with transitions to utilising Myrtaceae as host plants. With the approval of the Mudgee Local Aboriginal Land Council, Wiradjuri words were used to name the newly described species. ‘Baladi’ means ‘saw’ and ‘warru’ means ‘wasp’. This name honours the Traditional Owners of the lands on which the fossil was collected.
我们报告在新南威尔士州中部新发现的中新世McGraths Flat Konservat-Lagerstätte发现的澳大利亚Pergidae物种的第一个化石,Baladi warru gen. et sp. n.。利用保存完好的化石的形态学数据,以及先前发表的59个分类群的分子数据集和新生成的8个分类群的分子数据集,我们构建了一个数据矩阵,并生成了包含内部校准点的第一个Pergidae时间图谱。结果表明,Baladi warru属于稻谷亚科,与澳大利亚稻谷属(Cerealces)和Xyloperga (Cerealcini族)亲缘关系密切。根据我们的分析,Pergidae的起源似乎比之前假设的要稍微年轻一些;然而,需要额外的校准点来获得更详细的年龄限制。此外,祖先特征重建表明了四种独立的适应有毒桃金娘科作为寄主植物,而生物地理分析表明,同域性之后的建立事件是形成目前桃金娘不相交分布的主要过程。两个重要的建立事件与利用桃金娘科作为寄主植物的过渡相对应。在Mudgee当地土著土地委员会的批准下,Wiradjuri词被用来命名这个新发现的物种。“Baladi”的意思是“锯”,“warru”的意思是“黄蜂”。这个名字是为了纪念这块化石被采集地的传统主人。
{"title":"A new exceptionally preserved sawfly fossil (Hymenoptera: Pergidae) and an evaluation of its utility for divergence time estimation and biogeography","authors":"Juanita Rodriguez, Michael Frese, Mary Dettmann, Mahin Chavoshi-Jolfaei, John Macdonald","doi":"10.1111/syen.12653","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12653","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We report the discovery of the first fossil of an Australian species of Pergidae, <i>Baladi warru</i> <b>gen. et sp. n.</b>, found at McGraths Flat, a newly discovered Miocene Konservat-Lagerstätte in central New South Wales. Using morphological data from the well-preserved fossil, along with a previously published molecular dataset of 59 taxa and a newly generated molecular dataset for 8 taxa, we constructed a data matrix and generated the first chronogram for Pergidae that incorporates internal calibration points. Our data reveal that <i>Baladi warru</i> belongs to the subfamily Perginae and is closely related to the Australian genera <i>Cerealces</i> and <i>Xyloperga</i> (tribe Cerealcini). According to our analysis, the origin of Pergidae appears slightly younger than previously hypothesised; however, additional calibration points are needed for a more detailed age constraint. Furthermore, ancestral character reconstruction indicates four independent adaptations to toxic Myrtaceae as host plants, while biogeographic analyses suggest that sympatry followed by founder events were the primary processes shaping the current disjunct distribution of pergids. Two significant founder events correspond with transitions to utilising Myrtaceae as host plants. With the approval of the Mudgee Local Aboriginal Land Council, Wiradjuri words were used to name the newly described species. ‘Baladi’ means ‘saw’ and ‘warru’ means ‘wasp’. This name honours the Traditional Owners of the lands on which the fossil was collected.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 1","pages":"237-251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12653","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143116167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gaps in phylogenetic knowledge are unlikely to be filled in an optimal manner in the absence of a quantitative descriptive framework of phylogenetic coverage to date and a strategy for addressing the remainder (the Darwinian Shortfall). One strategy would be modelling phylogenetic progress on a framework of insect diversity, such as a taxonomic database. I herein sampled existing phylogenetic coverage by collating a machine-readable tree from each of 1000 insect publications. Processing comprised primarily taxonomic harmonization, the standardization of terminal labels and pruning of uninformative terminal sets such as taxon duplicates. The phylogeny database contained 94,173 unique species IDs over 154,938 terminals in total, with a respective mean and median number of species per phylogeny of 155 and 44. Omics phylogenies contained the most species on average, though not the most novel species, and mitogenome phylogenies contributed the fewest novel species. Synthesis phylogenies were very few in number, but nonetheless predicted to contribute most to increasing phylogenetic coverage of insect diversity. 6.2% of the 970,000 species of the Catalogue of Life were contained amongst the terminals of the database of phylogenies. Phylogenetic coverage of insect families was often disproportionate to species-richness; those most undersampled were beetles and included families Curculionidae, Staphylinidae, Cerambycidae, and Scarabaeidae, and those with disproportionately high phylogenetic coverage included families of the dragonflies, bees, butterflies and ants. The work herein provides a foundation for quantification of the Darwinian Shortfall, and for shifting to an objective strategy for completing the insect Tree of Life.
{"title":"Where are the biggest gaps in phylogenetic coverage of insect diversity?","authors":"Douglas Chesters","doi":"10.1111/syen.12652","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12652","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gaps in phylogenetic knowledge are unlikely to be filled in an optimal manner in the absence of a quantitative descriptive framework of phylogenetic coverage to date and a strategy for addressing the remainder (the Darwinian Shortfall). One strategy would be modelling phylogenetic progress on a framework of insect diversity, such as a taxonomic database. I herein sampled existing phylogenetic coverage by collating a machine-readable tree from each of 1000 insect publications. Processing comprised primarily taxonomic harmonization, the standardization of terminal labels and pruning of uninformative terminal sets such as taxon duplicates. The phylogeny database contained 94,173 unique species IDs over 154,938 terminals in total, with a respective mean and median number of species per phylogeny of 155 and 44. Omics phylogenies contained the most species on average, though not the most novel species, and mitogenome phylogenies contributed the fewest novel species. Synthesis phylogenies were very few in number, but nonetheless predicted to contribute most to increasing phylogenetic coverage of insect diversity. 6.2% of the 970,000 species of the Catalogue of Life were contained amongst the terminals of the database of phylogenies. Phylogenetic coverage of insect families was often disproportionate to species-richness; those most undersampled were beetles and included families Curculionidae, Staphylinidae, Cerambycidae, and Scarabaeidae, and those with disproportionately high phylogenetic coverage included families of the dragonflies, bees, butterflies and ants. The work herein provides a foundation for quantification of the Darwinian Shortfall, and for shifting to an objective strategy for completing the insect Tree of Life.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 1","pages":"221-236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143119216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karolina Mahlerová, Pavel Jakubec, Karol Krak, Jan Růžička
The worldwide distributed subfamily of rove beetles Silphinae contains two well-established tribes, based on both morphological and molecular data. The relationships within the tribe Nicrophorini have been mostly resolved; however, the tribe Silphini still lacks a robust phylogeny. Thus, here we resolved the phylogeny of the tribe based on 42 species of the 114 known species, using five molecular markers. Heterotemna tenuicornis Brullé clustered as sister to Silpha tristis Illiger, making the subgenus Silpha Linnaeus paraphyletic. Consequently, Heterotemna Wollaston is considered a junior subjective synonym of Silpha Linnaeus; requiring the following combinations: Silpha (Silpha) britoi (García & Pérez), comb. nov., Silpha (Silpha) figurata Brullé, comb. rest., and Silpha (Silpha) tenuicornis Brullé, comb. rest. Our estimate of the phylogeny agrees with current generic limits except it revealed that the genus Aclypea Reitter arose from within the genus Silpha, thus making the latter paraphyletic. Some ambiguity remains regarding the confidence of this finding; therefore, we refrain from synonymizing Aclypea until further study. Furthermore, it includes biogeographical information for each genus, which estimates the history of distributions of the Silphini across the Australian, Neotropical, and Oriental regions.
{"title":"Resolving the intergeneric phylogeny of the large carrion beetles (Staphylinidae: Silphinae: Silphini)","authors":"Karolina Mahlerová, Pavel Jakubec, Karol Krak, Jan Růžička","doi":"10.1111/syen.12650","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12650","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The worldwide distributed subfamily of rove beetles Silphinae contains two well-established tribes, based on both morphological and molecular data. The relationships within the tribe Nicrophorini have been mostly resolved; however, the tribe Silphini still lacks a robust phylogeny. Thus, here we resolved the phylogeny of the tribe based on 42 species of the 114 known species, using five molecular markers. <i>Heterotemna tenuicornis</i> Brullé clustered as sister to <i>Silpha tristis</i> Illiger, making the subgenus <i>Silpha</i> Linnaeus paraphyletic. Consequently, <i>Heterotemna</i> Wollaston is considered a junior subjective synonym of <i>Silpha</i> Linnaeus; requiring the following combinations: <i>Silpha</i> (<i>Silpha</i>) <i>britoi</i> (García & Pérez), <b>comb. nov.</b>, <i>Silpha</i> (<i>Silpha</i>) <i>figurata</i> Brullé, <b>comb. rest.,</b> and <i>Silpha</i> (<i>Silpha</i>) <i>tenuicornis</i> Brullé, <b>comb. rest.</b> Our estimate of the phylogeny agrees with current generic limits except it revealed that the genus <i>Aclypea</i> Reitter arose from within the genus <i>Silpha</i>, thus making the latter paraphyletic. Some ambiguity remains regarding the confidence of this finding; therefore, we refrain from synonymizing <i>Aclypea</i> until further study. Furthermore, it includes biogeographical information for each genus, which estimates the history of distributions of the Silphini across the Australian, Neotropical, and Oriental regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 1","pages":"168-179"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12650","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142254906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hamid Reza Ghanavi, Nicolas Chazot, Isabel Sanmartín, Leidys Murillo-Ramos, Sebastián Duchêne, Pasi Sihvonen, Gunnar Brehm, Niklas Wahlberg
A long-standing question in evolutionary biology is how historical biogeographic processes have shaped the current diversity of organisms, especially for highly diverse groups. We study the diversification dynamics and biogeographic processes of one of the most diverse families of Lepidoptera, Geometridae, with over 24,000 described species and a worldwide distribution. Despite the cosmopolitan distribution of the family, most species of Geometridae have limited distribution ranges. We present the largest historical biogeography and diversification study on the current diversity patterns and distribution ranges of Geometridae. We use a multi-locus dataset of 1200 taxa to estimate the historical biogeography of Geometridae, implementing a Bayesian approach of the Dispersal-Extinction-Cladogenesis (DEC) model that incorporates palaeographic-based dispersal graphs with uncertainty in geological ages in RevBayes. We also implement a Bayesian time-variable, episodic birth–death model and a model that allows branch-specific speciation rates to estimate the diversification dynamics in the family. Our results suggest that the most recent common ancestor of Geometridae was distributed in the New World, with the Neotropics being the most likely ancestral area. An increase in diversification rates occurred circa 30–40 million years ago (Mya), coinciding with a time of a major global climate cooling in the Eocene. Clade-specific shifts in speciation rates also occurred around 10–15 Mya, coincident with another period of major climate change in the Oligocene. Our results point to different biogeographical and evolutionary histories per area to show the differences of the diversification rates in different biogeographical regions through time, showing the relative importance of each region in the diversification history of Geometridae.
{"title":"Region-specific diversification dynamics and biogeographic history of one of the most diverse families of insects","authors":"Hamid Reza Ghanavi, Nicolas Chazot, Isabel Sanmartín, Leidys Murillo-Ramos, Sebastián Duchêne, Pasi Sihvonen, Gunnar Brehm, Niklas Wahlberg","doi":"10.1111/syen.12651","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12651","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A long-standing question in evolutionary biology is how historical biogeographic processes have shaped the current diversity of organisms, especially for highly diverse groups. We study the diversification dynamics and biogeographic processes of one of the most diverse families of Lepidoptera, Geometridae, with over 24,000 described species and a worldwide distribution. Despite the cosmopolitan distribution of the family, most species of Geometridae have limited distribution ranges. We present the largest historical biogeography and diversification study on the current diversity patterns and distribution ranges of Geometridae. We use a multi-locus dataset of 1200 taxa to estimate the historical biogeography of Geometridae, implementing a Bayesian approach of the Dispersal-Extinction-Cladogenesis (DEC) model that incorporates palaeographic-based dispersal graphs with uncertainty in geological ages in RevBayes. We also implement a Bayesian time-variable, episodic birth–death model and a model that allows branch-specific speciation rates to estimate the diversification dynamics in the family. Our results suggest that the most recent common ancestor of Geometridae was distributed in the New World, with the Neotropics being the most likely ancestral area. An increase in diversification rates occurred circa 30–40 million years ago (Mya), coinciding with a time of a major global climate cooling in the Eocene. Clade-specific shifts in speciation rates also occurred around 10–15 Mya, coincident with another period of major climate change in the Oligocene. Our results point to different biogeographical and evolutionary histories per area to show the differences of the diversification rates in different biogeographical regions through time, showing the relative importance of each region in the diversification history of Geometridae.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 1","pages":"206-220"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12651","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142269134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Repeated and convergent evolution of wing venation may have contributed to the diversification and evolution of the cicada tribe Polyneurini, which are well known for colourful wings and complex wing venation. We investigated the phylogeny and diversification of Polyneurini based on morphological characters and molecular data, as well as molecular data of their obligate endosymbiont ‘Candidatus Sulcia muelleri’ (hereafter referred to as Sulcia). Phylogenetic analyses do not support the monophyly of the formerly defined subtribes Polyneurina and Formotosenina. Accordingly, Parapolyneura Wang, Hayashi & Wei gen. n. is erected for Pa. guoliangi (Wang & Liu) comb. n.; Formotosena pervalida Wang, Hayashi & Wei sp. n. and F. maculata Wang, Hayashi & Wei sp. n. are established; Proretinata Chou & Yao stat. rev. is resurrected from junior synonymy with Angamiana Distant; five junior synonyms are recognized for Pr. floridula (Distant) comb. n., and four junior synonyms are proposed for Po. cheni Chou & Yao. The subtribes of Polyneurini are redefined, in which Polyneura Westwood, Parapolyneuragen. n., Angamiana and Proretinatastat. rev. are included in Polyneurina, and Formotosena kato and Graptopsaltria Stål trans. n. in Formotosenina. The phylogeny of the very conservative Sulcia mirrors the host phylogeny, which supports the redefinition of the two subtribes in Polyneurini. Polyneurini likely originated and initially diversified during the Mid-Miocene. Dramatic Pleistocene climatic oscillations together with the sea-level fluctuations had profound effects on the diversification and vicariance of Polyneurini. The reticulate wing venation most likely evolved three times in Polyneurini. This study improves our understanding of diversification and evolution of this unique cicada tribe and serves as an example for future studies on the diversification of Cicadidae.
{"title":"Phylogeny and evolution of the cicada tribe Polyneurini (Hemiptera, Cicadidae)","authors":"Jiali Wang, Wenzhe Zhang, Jingyuan Yang, Masami Hayashi, Cong Wei","doi":"10.1111/syen.12649","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12649","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Repeated and convergent evolution of wing venation may have contributed to the diversification and evolution of the cicada tribe Polyneurini, which are well known for colourful wings and complex wing venation. We investigated the phylogeny and diversification of Polyneurini based on morphological characters and molecular data, as well as molecular data of their obligate endosymbiont ‘<i>Candidatus</i> Sulcia muelleri’ (hereafter referred to as <i>Sulcia</i>). Phylogenetic analyses do not support the monophyly of the formerly defined subtribes Polyneurina and Formotosenina. Accordingly, <i>Parapolyneura</i> Wang, Hayashi & Wei <b>gen</b>. <b>n</b>. is erected for <i>Pa. guoliangi</i> (Wang & Liu) <b>comb</b>. <b>n</b>.; <i>Formotosena pervalida</i> Wang, Hayashi & Wei <b>sp</b>. <b>n</b>. and <i>F. maculata</i> Wang, Hayashi & Wei <b>sp</b>. <b>n</b>. are established; <i>Proretinata</i> Chou & Yao <b>stat</b>. <b>rev</b>. is resurrected from junior synonymy with <i>Angamiana</i> Distant; five junior synonyms are recognized for <i>Pr. floridula</i> (Distant) <b>comb</b>. <b>n.</b>, and four junior synonyms are proposed for <i>Po. cheni</i> Chou & Yao. The subtribes of Polyneurini are redefined, in which <i>Polyneura</i> Westwood, <i>Parapolyneura</i> <b>gen</b>. <b>n</b>., <i>Angamiana</i> and <i>Proretinata</i> <b>stat</b>. <b>rev</b>. are included in Polyneurina, and <i>Formotosena</i> kato and <i>Graptopsaltria</i> Stål <b>trans. n.</b> in Formotosenina. The phylogeny of the very conservative <i>Sulcia</i> mirrors the host phylogeny, which supports the redefinition of the two subtribes in Polyneurini. Polyneurini likely originated and initially diversified during the Mid-Miocene. Dramatic Pleistocene climatic oscillations together with the sea-level fluctuations had profound effects on the diversification and vicariance of Polyneurini. The reticulate wing venation most likely evolved three times in Polyneurini. This study improves our understanding of diversification and evolution of this unique cicada tribe and serves as an example for future studies on the diversification of Cicadidae.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 1","pages":"180-205"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141926792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ishtiag H. Abdalla, Mervyn W. Mansell, Catherine L. Sole, Gimo M. Daniel
The lacewing genus Afroptera Abdalla & Mansell (Neuroptera: Nemopteridae: Nemopterinae) is endemic to southern Africa, predominantly found in the Fynbos and Succulent Karoo biomes. The taxonomy of the genus has been recently resolved. However, the monophyly and evolutionary history of the genus has never been addressed. This study employs an integrative phylogenetic approach, by incorporating three ribosomal genes (16S, 28S and 18S) and two protein-coding genes (cytochrome oxidase subunit I and carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase-aspartate transcarbamoylase-dihydroorotase), and morphological data to examine the monophyly and historical biogeography of Afroptera. We use Bayesian, parsimony and maximum likelihood phylogenetic methods to assess the monophyly and relatedness of Afroptera within the Nemopterinae. We also use ancestral range reconstruction and diversification analysis to infer the historical biogeography of the genus. Our analyses reveal the genus as a monophyletic lineage. The genus Afroptera originated during the Pliocene (5.24–3.13 Mya) in a desert environment, experiencing rapid speciation during the Pleistocene, primarily within the Fynbos and Succulent biomes; and secondarily dispersed into the Nama Karoo and Savannah (Kalahari) biomes. The current distribution patterns of Afroptera species likely stem from intensified aridification in the southwest during the Plio-Pleistocene, consistent with the dry-adapted nature of Afroptera's ancestors. Therefore, our findings suggest a climatically driven diversification model for the genus Afroptera.
{"title":"Phylogeny and historical biogeography of the southern African lacewing genus Afroptera (Neuroptera: Nemopteridae: Nemopterinae)","authors":"Ishtiag H. Abdalla, Mervyn W. Mansell, Catherine L. Sole, Gimo M. Daniel","doi":"10.1111/syen.12648","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12648","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The lacewing genus <i>Afroptera</i> Abdalla & Mansell (Neuroptera: Nemopteridae: Nemopterinae) is endemic to southern Africa, predominantly found in the Fynbos and Succulent Karoo biomes. The taxonomy of the genus has been recently resolved. However, the monophyly and evolutionary history of the genus has never been addressed. This study employs an integrative phylogenetic approach, by incorporating three ribosomal genes (16S, 28S and 18S) and two protein-coding genes (cytochrome oxidase subunit I and carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase-aspartate transcarbamoylase-dihydroorotase), and morphological data to examine the monophyly and historical biogeography of <i>Afroptera</i>. We use Bayesian, parsimony and maximum likelihood phylogenetic methods to assess the monophyly and relatedness of <i>Afroptera</i> within the Nemopterinae. We also use ancestral range reconstruction and diversification analysis to infer the historical biogeography of the genus. Our analyses reveal the genus as a monophyletic lineage. The genus <i>Afroptera</i> originated during the Pliocene (5.24–3.13 Mya) in a desert environment, experiencing rapid speciation during the Pleistocene, primarily within the Fynbos and Succulent biomes; and secondarily dispersed into the Nama Karoo and Savannah (Kalahari) biomes. The current distribution patterns of <i>Afroptera</i> species likely stem from intensified aridification in the southwest during the Plio-Pleistocene, consistent with the dry-adapted nature of <i>Afroptera's</i> ancestors. Therefore, our findings suggest a climatically driven diversification model for the genus <i>Afroptera</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 1","pages":"154-167"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12648","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141867468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The recent advances in sequencing technologies, phylogenomics and divergence dating methods call for an integrative review of the current state of Hymenoptera systematics. We here explore the impact of these latest developments on the Hymenoptera phylogeny and our understanding of the timing of Hymenoptera evolution, while identifying the current methodological constraints and persistent knowledge gaps that warrant further investigation. Our review highlights the lack of consensus among the backbone phylogeny of Hymenoptera between key phylogenomic studies, as the higher level phylogeny remains unresolved in key nodes such as the relationships among Eusymphyta, the relationships within the Infraorder Proctotrupomorpha and the placements of the superfamilies Ichneumonoidea, Ceraphronoidea and Vespoidea. Furthermore, we underline the huge variation in divergence age estimates for Hymenoptera and detect several major gaps and/or disagreements between the fossil record and available age estimates, either due to the poorly studied fossil record or problematic age estimates, or both. To better understand the timing of Hymenoptera evolution and the role of key diversification factors, we will need continuous efforts to (i) reconcile conflicts among morphological and molecular phylogenies, by improving taxon sampling of underrepresented lineages, applying novel techniques to study morphology, making use of genome-scale data and critically assessing incongruences in genetic markers; (ii) improve the Hymenoptera fossil record, by exercising integrative taxonomy and bringing together paleontologists and neontologists; and (iii) reconcile age estimates, by relying on tip dating approaches to bridge fossils, morphology and genomes across time.
{"title":"Evolving perspectives in Hymenoptera systematics: Bridging fossils and genomes across time","authors":"Y. Miles Zhang, Silas Bossert, Tamara Spasojevic","doi":"10.1111/syen.12645","DOIUrl":"10.1111/syen.12645","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recent advances in sequencing technologies, phylogenomics and divergence dating methods call for an integrative review of the current state of Hymenoptera systematics. We here explore the impact of these latest developments on the Hymenoptera phylogeny and our understanding of the timing of Hymenoptera evolution, while identifying the current methodological constraints and persistent knowledge gaps that warrant further investigation. Our review highlights the lack of consensus among the backbone phylogeny of Hymenoptera between key phylogenomic studies, as the higher level phylogeny remains unresolved in key nodes such as the relationships among Eusymphyta, the relationships within the Infraorder Proctotrupomorpha and the placements of the superfamilies Ichneumonoidea, Ceraphronoidea and Vespoidea. Furthermore, we underline the huge variation in divergence age estimates for Hymenoptera and detect several major gaps and/or disagreements between the fossil record and available age estimates, either due to the poorly studied fossil record or problematic age estimates, or both. To better understand the timing of Hymenoptera evolution and the role of key diversification factors, we will need continuous efforts to (i) reconcile conflicts among morphological and molecular phylogenies, by improving taxon sampling of underrepresented lineages, applying novel techniques to study morphology, making use of genome-scale data and critically assessing incongruences in genetic markers; (ii) improve the Hymenoptera fossil record, by exercising integrative taxonomy and bringing together paleontologists and neontologists; and (iii) reconcile age estimates, by relying on tip dating approaches to bridge fossils, morphology and genomes across time.</p>","PeriodicalId":22126,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Entomology","volume":"50 1","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/syen.12645","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141744929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}