Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103112
Joseph Lee , Jae-Hyeon Ahn , Jaeho Myeong
The rollout of 5G mobile technology has been anticipated to play a pivotal role in digital transformation, yet rigorous empirical evidence on its behavioral effects remains limited. This study addresses that gap by analyzing individual-level transaction data from South Korea covering October 2018 to December 2019. Employing a difference-in-differences approach with coarsened exact matching, we estimate the causal impact of 5G adoption on consumption patterns across digital and non-digital domains. Results show that 5G adoption increases in the frequency, spending amount, share, and diversity of digital transactions, while non-digital transactions remain unchanged. These effects are particularly strong in non-metropolitan regions, where improvements in network performance trigger larger behavioral responses. Within these regions, younger users and women show especially pronounced increases in digital engagement, while income-related differences are not statistically significant. By providing individual-level evidence on how advanced mobile infrastructure influences real-world consumption behavior, this study contributes to the literature on digital behavior, infrastructure inequality, and the digitalization paradox, with implications for business strategy and public policy.
{"title":"The behavioral impact of 5G adoption: Evidence from individual-level transaction data","authors":"Joseph Lee , Jae-Hyeon Ahn , Jaeho Myeong","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103112","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103112","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rollout of 5G mobile technology has been anticipated to play a pivotal role in digital transformation, yet rigorous empirical evidence on its behavioral effects remains limited. This study addresses that gap by analyzing individual-level transaction data from South Korea covering October 2018 to December 2019. Employing a difference-in-differences approach with coarsened exact matching, we estimate the causal impact of 5G adoption on consumption patterns across digital and non-digital domains. Results show that 5G adoption increases in the frequency, spending amount, share, and diversity of digital transactions, while non-digital transactions remain unchanged. These effects are particularly strong in non-metropolitan regions, where improvements in network performance trigger larger behavioral responses. Within these regions, younger users and women show especially pronounced increases in digital engagement, while income-related differences are not statistically significant. By providing individual-level evidence on how advanced mobile infrastructure influences real-world consumption behavior, this study contributes to the literature on digital behavior, infrastructure inequality, and the digitalization paradox, with implications for business strategy and public policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 103112"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145957620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-15DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103115
Michael Latzer
Digitalization, currently spearheaded by artificial intelligence, not only disenchants but also re-enchants societies, giving rise to a transhumanism-shaped techno-religion that contests prevailing interpretations of the Enlightenment project in Western societies. This article draws on a long-term perspective on media change and a sociotechnical conception of the digitalization of societies as the Digital Trinity: the co-evolutionary interplay of datafication, algorithmization, and platformization. It argues that this trinity of transformative forces is marked by a transhumanist reinterpretation of Enlightenment and exhibits corresponding techno-religious features. These features are revealed both in societal functions (e.g., handling contingencies, contributing to sensemaking) and in individual experiences of digitalization (e.g., the feedback loop of sacralizing technology and the self). Transhumanist visions of a technically controllable human evolution and transcendence replicate and reinforce belief structures traditionally associated with organized religions. Drawing on critical-theoretical readings of Kant, the article demonstrates how the rise of this techno-religion and its underlying transhumanist reinterpretation of Enlightenment stand in tension with the prevailing Kantian conception of Enlightenment, whose emancipatory aim is to foster “maturity” through critical reason, rationality, and human autonomy. In response, it suggests a next wave of Enlightenment that moves beyond the anthropocentric 18th-century model by combining the safeguarding of traditional values with the overcoming of recognized shortcomings and adaptation to today's highly networked digital realities. It argues for curbing the mystical side of digitalization; reclaiming public discourse from transhumanist mythologies; and reframing human self-understanding within a networked, more ecocentric perspective, for example, by resisting the strong anthropomorphization of technological systems.
{"title":"Digitalization, AI and the rise of techno-religion: Transhumanist promises and the challenge to Enlightenment","authors":"Michael Latzer","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103115","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103115","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digitalization, currently spearheaded by artificial intelligence, not only disenchants but also re-enchants societies, giving rise to a transhumanism-shaped techno-religion that contests prevailing interpretations of the Enlightenment project in Western societies. This article draws on a long-term perspective on media change and a sociotechnical conception of the digitalization of societies as the Digital Trinity: the co-evolutionary interplay of datafication, algorithmization, and platformization. It argues that this trinity of transformative forces is marked by a transhumanist reinterpretation of Enlightenment and exhibits corresponding techno-religious features. These features are revealed both in societal functions (e.g., handling contingencies, contributing to sensemaking) and in individual experiences of digitalization (e.g., the feedback loop of sacralizing technology and the self). Transhumanist visions of a technically controllable human evolution and transcendence replicate and reinforce belief structures traditionally associated with organized religions. Drawing on critical-theoretical readings of Kant, the article demonstrates how the rise of this techno-religion and its underlying transhumanist reinterpretation of Enlightenment stand in tension with the prevailing Kantian conception of Enlightenment, whose emancipatory aim is to foster “maturity” through critical reason, rationality, and human autonomy. In response, it suggests a next wave of Enlightenment that moves beyond the anthropocentric 18th-century model by combining the safeguarding of traditional values with the overcoming of recognized shortcomings and adaptation to today's highly networked digital realities. It argues for curbing the mystical side of digitalization; reclaiming public discourse from transhumanist mythologies; and reframing human self-understanding within a networked, more ecocentric perspective, for example, by resisting the strong anthropomorphization of technological systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 103115"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145957623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103117
Wenjia Yan , Yu-li Liu , Valeriia Mamaeva , Fang Dong , Guannan Tao , Rubing Li , Heng Yang
This study seeks to develop and validate a generative AI literacy scale, examining its influence on privacy protection and information verification behaviors. Using a mixed-methods approach that includes qualitative focus groups (n = 47) and a nationwide survey (n = 535), four essential dimensions of literacy are identified, namely, awareness, usage, evaluation, and ethics/risks. The results indicate that the scale incorporates features unique to generative AI, such as crafting effective prompts to improve performance and addressing risks related to misinformation, legal challenges, and systemic bias. Structural equation modeling reveals that awareness and ethics/risks significantly predict both privacy protection and information verification behaviors, while frequent users of generative AI are less likely to verify the information encountered. This research contributes to advancing the measurement of generative AI literacy and provides practical insights into fostering a responsible and informed adoption of generative AI technologies across diverse user groups.
{"title":"Generative AI literacy: Scale development and its influence on privacy protection behaviors and information verification behaviors","authors":"Wenjia Yan , Yu-li Liu , Valeriia Mamaeva , Fang Dong , Guannan Tao , Rubing Li , Heng Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103117","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103117","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study seeks to develop and validate a generative AI literacy scale, examining its influence on privacy protection and information verification behaviors. Using a mixed-methods approach that includes qualitative focus groups (n = 47) and a nationwide survey (n = 535), four essential dimensions of literacy are identified, namely, awareness, usage, evaluation, and ethics/risks. The results indicate that the scale incorporates features unique to generative AI, such as crafting effective prompts to improve performance and addressing risks related to misinformation, legal challenges, and systemic bias. Structural equation modeling reveals that awareness and ethics/risks significantly predict both privacy protection and information verification behaviors, while frequent users of generative AI are less likely to verify the information encountered. This research contributes to advancing the measurement of generative AI literacy and provides practical insights into fostering a responsible and informed adoption of generative AI technologies across diverse user groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 103117"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145957843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103128
Sindhura Kammardi Sachidananda , Leon Tinashe Gwaka , Christopher S. Yoo
Device affordability is one of the key barriers to Internet access and use in most low- and middle-income countries. Reducing or eliminating taxes on devices has emerged as a major way to make devices more affordable. However, the empirical evidence on the impact of tax reductions on device access remains limited. To help fill this gap, this study estimates the impact of Colombia's Value Added Tax (VAT) exemption, announced in late 2016, on smartphone penetration rates. Using the Synthetic Control Method (SCM) applied to country-level panel data from 2009 to 2021, our study finds that smartphone penetration in Colombia reached 66.8 % by the end of 2021, an increase of 7.6 percentage points over the 59.2 % level of its synthetic counterpart, which represents a 12.8 % relative increase. These results were validated through placebo tests and other robustness checks. A preliminary, illustrative cost-benefit analysis suggests that the broader economic growth driven by increased smartphone penetration could plausibly offset the VAT revenue loss over time. These findings confirm that reducing or eliminating taxes on smartphones improves smartphone penetration and contributes to bridging the digital divide. The work can be extended by exploring VAT exemptions in other countries and reductions on other forms of taxes.
{"title":"Estimating the impact of Value Added Tax exemptions on smartphone penetration in Colombia using the synthetic control method","authors":"Sindhura Kammardi Sachidananda , Leon Tinashe Gwaka , Christopher S. Yoo","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103128","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103128","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Device affordability is one of the key barriers to Internet access and use in most low- and middle-income countries. Reducing or eliminating taxes on devices has emerged as a major way to make devices more affordable. However, the empirical evidence on the impact of tax reductions on device access remains limited. To help fill this gap, this study estimates the impact of Colombia's Value Added Tax (VAT) exemption, announced in late 2016, on smartphone penetration rates. Using the Synthetic Control Method (SCM) applied to country-level panel data from 2009 to 2021, our study finds that smartphone penetration in Colombia reached 66.8 % by the end of 2021, an increase of 7.6 percentage points over the 59.2 % level of its synthetic counterpart, which represents a 12.8 % relative increase. These results were validated through placebo tests and other robustness checks. A preliminary, illustrative cost-benefit analysis suggests that the broader economic growth driven by increased smartphone penetration could plausibly offset the VAT revenue loss over time. These findings confirm that reducing or eliminating taxes on smartphones improves smartphone penetration and contributes to bridging the digital divide. The work can be extended by exploring VAT exemptions in other countries and reductions on other forms of taxes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 103128"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145957638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103113
Joan Calzada , Alejandra Pablo
This paper analyzes the impact of broadband use on online banking adoption and the contracting of online financial products in Spain between 2010 and 2022. Using survey data on household access to information and communication technologies, we assess whether high-speed broadband access facilitates adoption and whether its use narrows or, rather, reinforces existing socioeconomic divides. Results show that fixed broadband increases the probability of adopting online banking by 11.3 % and of contracting financial products online by 1.3 %. Adoption is positively associated with being male, more educated, employed, and having a higher-income, while it decreases with age. Although broadband promotes overall adoption of online banking, it also amplifies divides, with the middle-aged, better educated, and wealthier groups benefiting most, while women, older adults, and the less educated remain disadvantaged. To strengthen causal inference, we exploit a four-year panel from the same survey and use an instrumental variable strategy based on lagged broadband coverage, which confirms the positive causal effect of broadband access on adoption. These findings show that broadband expansion stimulates financial digitalization but may also exacerbate inequality, emphasizing the need for complementary digital inclusion policies.
{"title":"Broadband deployment and access to online banking: Does improved technology facilitate adoption?","authors":"Joan Calzada , Alejandra Pablo","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103113","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103113","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper analyzes the impact of broadband use on online banking adoption and the contracting of online financial products in Spain between 2010 and 2022. Using survey data on household access to information and communication technologies, we assess whether high-speed broadband access facilitates adoption and whether its use narrows or, rather, reinforces existing socioeconomic divides. Results show that fixed broadband increases the probability of adopting online banking by 11.3 % and of contracting financial products online by 1.3 %. Adoption is positively associated with being male, more educated, employed, and having a higher-income, while it decreases with age. Although broadband promotes overall adoption of online banking, it also amplifies divides, with the middle-aged, better educated, and wealthier groups benefiting most, while women, older adults, and the less educated remain disadvantaged. To strengthen causal inference, we exploit a four-year panel from the same survey and use an instrumental variable strategy based on lagged broadband coverage, which confirms the positive causal effect of broadband access on adoption. These findings show that broadband expansion stimulates financial digitalization but may also exacerbate inequality, emphasizing the need for complementary digital inclusion policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 103113"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145957621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103111
Wolfgang Briglauer , Christopher Yoo
The net neutrality debate, spanning about two decades, has recently undergone revisions in the EU and the UK and encountered divergent policies in the US. These rules significantly influence market power in the ICT ecosystem, shaped by fundamental changes effected by the embrace of sector-specific regulation in the EU and the origin of the net neutrality debate in the US in the early 2000s. Notably, empirical research on the economic impact of net neutrality rules is limited despite the fact that it represents a substantial ex-ante market intervention with uncertain effects towards main market actors. Focusing on the mobile sector, we examine the effectiveness of net neutrality rules in light of key technological and regulatory developments and the efficiency of net neutrality rules in light of the empirical literature. The available empirical literature inidcates that net neutrality regulation is likely to be inefficient, implying negative welfare effects, even more so when the total regulatory costs are taken into account. In contrast, no empirical study supports the arguments of proponents. Moreover, we find that net neutrality policies imposed on only one segment of the Internet value chain have become increasingly ineffective and that EU-style net neutrality regulations will lead to substantial market uncertainties regarding 5G-based services and applications. In terms of efficiency and effectiveness, the “first best” policy recommendation would be to remove obvious over-regulation that impedes investment, such as net neutrality rules. The “second best” policy recommendation in terms of actual political feasibility is that providers of broadband Internet access services should be given more options for pricing and quality design, subject to established ex-post competition law as well as existing sectoral transparency and end-user protections. Alternatively, regulators could consider a principles-based framework subject to a limited scope of ex-ante obligations.
{"title":"Efficiency and effectiveness of net neutrality rules in the mobile sector: Relevant developments and state of the empirical literature","authors":"Wolfgang Briglauer , Christopher Yoo","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103111","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103111","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The net neutrality debate, spanning about two decades, has recently undergone revisions in the EU and the UK and encountered divergent policies in the US. These rules significantly influence market power in the ICT ecosystem, shaped by fundamental changes effected by the embrace of sector-specific regulation in the EU and the origin of the net neutrality debate in the US in the early 2000s. Notably, empirical research on the economic impact of net neutrality rules is limited despite the fact that it represents a substantial ex-ante market intervention with uncertain effects towards main market actors. Focusing on the mobile sector, we examine the effectiveness of net neutrality rules in light of key technological and regulatory developments and the efficiency of net neutrality rules in light of the empirical literature. The available empirical literature inidcates that net neutrality regulation is likely to be inefficient, implying negative welfare effects, even more so when the total regulatory costs are taken into account. In contrast, no empirical study supports the arguments of proponents. Moreover, we find that net neutrality policies imposed on only one segment of the Internet value chain have become increasingly ineffective and that EU-style net neutrality regulations will lead to substantial market uncertainties regarding 5G-based services and applications. In terms of efficiency and effectiveness, the “first best” policy recommendation would be to remove obvious over-regulation that impedes investment, such as net neutrality rules. The “second best” policy recommendation in terms of actual political feasibility is that providers of broadband Internet access services should be given more options for pricing and quality design, subject to established ex-post competition law as well as existing sectoral transparency and end-user protections. Alternatively, regulators could consider a principles-based framework subject to a limited scope of ex-ante obligations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 103111"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145957641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-26DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103114
Junhua Zhu , Elina Sinkkonen , Mikael Mattlin
This article explains why and how China aims to set international standards in artificial intelligence (AI), by analysing AI standardisation's place within China's National Innovation System (NIS). Emerging technologies, such as AI, where global norms and governance institutions are yet to be established, offer greater possibilities for latecomers to set international standards. As areas of AI are general-purpose technologies, it matters what kind of standards are set, and who sets them. Building on arguments that domestic technology diffusion has become more important than innovation capacity, we contend that in strategic technology competition it is essential for great powers to diffuse their technology solutions internationally, for which standardisation is a key channel. Through a detailed analysis of China's AI innovation system, we argue that China's AI-related NIS is maturing. China has already developed national AI standards, and its standard-setting is internationalising, as our analysis of Chinese policy documents on AI standardisation shows. Lingering weaknesses in basic AI research, however, still limit the potential for Chinese firms to set de facto standards through market competition, beyond specific AI applications. Amid intense Sino-US strategic technology competition, China's possibilities to successfully pursue international committee- or government-led standardisation, and thereby technology diffusion, have also been restricted. Yet, the recent US turn away from promoting a rules-based order opens new possibilities for Chinese standardisation efforts. The Chinese government has promoted market- and firm-led standardisation around open-source solutions, while increasingly targeting its multilateral standard-setting towards the ‘Global South’, e.g. through its 2025 Action Plan for Global Artificial Intelligence Governance.
{"title":"Strategic technology competition revisited: A National Innovation System rationale for China's artificial intelligence standardisation strategy","authors":"Junhua Zhu , Elina Sinkkonen , Mikael Mattlin","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103114","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103114","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explains why and how China aims to set international standards in artificial intelligence (AI), by analysing AI standardisation's place within China's National Innovation System (NIS). Emerging technologies, such as AI, where global norms and governance institutions are yet to be established, offer greater possibilities for latecomers to set international standards. As areas of AI are general-purpose technologies, it matters what kind of standards are set, and who sets them. Building on arguments that domestic technology diffusion has become more important than innovation capacity, we contend that in strategic technology competition it is essential for great powers to diffuse their technology solutions internationally, for which standardisation is a key channel. Through a detailed analysis of China's AI innovation system, we argue that China's AI-related NIS is maturing. China has already developed national AI standards, and its standard-setting is internationalising, as our analysis of Chinese policy documents on AI standardisation shows. Lingering weaknesses in basic AI research, however, still limit the potential for Chinese firms to set <em>de facto</em> standards through market competition, beyond specific AI applications. Amid intense Sino-US strategic technology competition, China's possibilities to successfully pursue international committee- or government-led standardisation, and thereby technology diffusion, have also been restricted. Yet, the recent US turn away from promoting a rules-based order opens new possibilities for Chinese standardisation efforts. The Chinese government has promoted market- and firm-led standardisation around open-source solutions, while increasingly targeting its multilateral standard-setting towards the ‘Global South’, e.g. through its 2025 Action Plan for Global Artificial Intelligence Governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 103114"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145957622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103088
Samuel Groesch, Alena Birrer, Natascha Just, Florian Saurwein
The Digital Services Act (DSA) establishes a Transparency Database (DSA-TDB) and requires platforms to submit Statements of Reasons (SoRs) explaining their moderation decisions. According to the DSA, the database is intended to serve three objectives: ensuring transparency, enabling scrutiny over content-moderation decisions, and monitoring the spread of illegal content. From a communications-policy perspective, this article evaluates the DSA-TDB’s ability to meet these objectives. We go beyond data-centric analyses and critically assess the database’s design, including its reporting schema, guidelines and its data-access modalities, showing that these design choices impede the attainment of the stated objectives even before any data are analyzed. In addition, we run exploratory regressions on 3.52 billion SoRs, submitted by major social media platforms over a 20-month period, to assess whether the database can answer policy- and research-relevant questions. By analyzing restriction intensity, classification of illegality, and moderation speed, we illustrate the theoretical-analytical leverage the data could offer and how design and quality limitations constrain this potential. Mindful of data-quality constraints, the analyses assess the database’s regulatory utility rather than foreground substantive findings. Overall, while the DSA-TDB marks a step towards transparency, significant shortcomings remain: limited usability and accessibility, absence of key data for scrutiny and for monitoring the spread of illegal content, and concerns about consistency, reliability and validity of platform reporting. Consequently, the database falls short of its objectives. Alongside recommendations for improving the database, we argue for the necessity of reviewing the regulatory objectives themselves.
{"title":"Big data, small answers: How the DSA Transparency Database falls short of its regulatory objectives","authors":"Samuel Groesch, Alena Birrer, Natascha Just, Florian Saurwein","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103088","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103088","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Digital Services Act (DSA) establishes a Transparency Database (DSA-TDB) and requires platforms to submit Statements of Reasons (SoRs) explaining their moderation decisions. According to the DSA, the database is intended to serve three objectives: ensuring transparency, enabling scrutiny over content-moderation decisions, and monitoring the spread of illegal content. From a communications-policy perspective, this article evaluates the DSA-TDB’s ability to meet these objectives. We go beyond data-centric analyses and critically assess the database’s design, including its reporting schema, guidelines and its data-access modalities, showing that these design choices impede the attainment of the stated objectives even before any data are analyzed. In addition, we run exploratory regressions on 3.52 billion SoRs, submitted by major social media platforms over a 20-month period, to assess whether the database can answer policy- and research-relevant questions. By analyzing restriction intensity, classification of illegality, and moderation speed, we illustrate the theoretical-analytical leverage the data could offer and how design and quality limitations constrain this potential. Mindful of data-quality constraints, the analyses assess the database’s regulatory utility rather than foreground substantive findings. Overall, while the DSA-TDB marks a step towards transparency, significant shortcomings remain: limited usability and accessibility, absence of key data for scrutiny and for monitoring the spread of illegal content, and concerns about consistency, reliability and validity of platform reporting. Consequently, the database falls short of its objectives. Alongside recommendations for improving the database, we argue for the necessity of reviewing the regulatory objectives themselves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":"Article 103088"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145705467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-06DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103106
Jeong-Ah Park , Chang Hyun Kim , Hye-Jin Kim
This study investigates how national AI literacy and its operating environment jointly shape the frequency of AI-related incidents and hazards across countries. Drawing on cross-national panel data from 62 countries between 2014 and 2024, we integrate AI incident reports from the OECD AI Incidents Monitor with indicators from the Tortoise Global AI Index. AI literacy is proxied by the AI Talent Index, capturing the human capital available for AI development and deployment, while the AI Operating Environment Index reflects institutional and regulatory conditions supporting responsible AI use. Using a correlated random effects negative binomial model, we find that countries with higher AI literacy are associated with higher expected counts of reported AI-related incidents, consistent with greater exposure and capture. However, this relationship is significantly mitigated in countries with more mature operating environments. The interaction between AI talent and governance demonstrates a complementary risk-mitigation effect: in environments with robust safeguards, higher AI literacy leads to lower expected incident counts compared to environments with high literacy but weak governance. These findings suggest that building human capital without adequate governance may increase societal risk, and that effective AI policy must align investments in talent with regulatory infrastructure. Our results underscore the need for integrated national strategies to promote both capability and accountability in the era of rapidly advancing AI.
{"title":"AI literacy for safe deployment: Cross-national evidence on the interaction between talent and governance","authors":"Jeong-Ah Park , Chang Hyun Kim , Hye-Jin Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103106","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103106","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how national AI literacy and its operating environment jointly shape the frequency of AI-related incidents and hazards across countries. Drawing on cross-national panel data from 62 countries between 2014 and 2024, we integrate AI incident reports from the OECD AI Incidents Monitor with indicators from the Tortoise Global AI Index. AI literacy is proxied by the AI Talent Index, capturing the human capital available for AI development and deployment, while the AI Operating Environment Index reflects institutional and regulatory conditions supporting responsible AI use. Using a correlated random effects negative binomial model, we find that countries with higher AI literacy are associated with higher expected counts of reported AI-related incidents, consistent with greater exposure and capture. However, this relationship is significantly mitigated in countries with more mature operating environments. The interaction between AI talent and governance demonstrates a complementary risk-mitigation effect: in environments with robust safeguards, higher AI literacy leads to lower expected incident counts compared to environments with high literacy but weak governance. These findings suggest that building human capital without adequate governance may increase societal risk, and that effective AI policy must align investments in talent with regulatory infrastructure. Our results underscore the need for integrated national strategies to promote both capability and accountability in the era of rapidly advancing AI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":"Article 103106"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145705373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-07DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103079
Yujun Lin , Yuqi Lin , Junbo Liu , Zhaoyang Tan , Weihang Han
Although new technology diplomacy and China's AI rise have drawn attention, academic research on the Chinese innovation ecosystem from the perspective of AI startups remains limited. This paper explores China's new technology diplomacy by proposing a Triple Helix Synergy Model (THSM), to analyze the dynamic interplay among government, industry, and academia in advancing AI innovation and geopolitical influence. Based on in-depth qualitative interviews with 23 AI startup executives, the analysis elucidates the structure of China's new technology diplomacy, highlighting the government's role as an ecosystem architect through multi-level governance, industries as conduits for global market expansion and standardization diplomacy, and universities as hubs for technological breakthroughs and international talent circulation. The discussion illustrates how the THSM, through strategic hybridization, aligns innovation with geopolitical goals to enhance ecosystem resilience. THSM represents a Chinese mode that strategically coordinates state, industry, and academia to integrate technological advancement with diplomatic objectives.
{"title":"Triple Helix Synergy Model in China's new technology diplomacy: Perspectives from AI startups","authors":"Yujun Lin , Yuqi Lin , Junbo Liu , Zhaoyang Tan , Weihang Han","doi":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103079","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103079","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although new technology diplomacy and China's AI rise have drawn attention, academic research on the Chinese innovation ecosystem from the perspective of AI startups remains limited. This paper explores China's new technology diplomacy by proposing a Triple Helix Synergy Model (THSM), to analyze the dynamic interplay among government, industry, and academia in advancing AI innovation and geopolitical influence. Based on in-depth qualitative interviews with 23 AI startup executives, the analysis elucidates the structure of China's new technology diplomacy, highlighting the government's role as an ecosystem architect through multi-level governance, industries as conduits for global market expansion and standardization diplomacy, and universities as hubs for technological breakthroughs and international talent circulation. The discussion illustrates how the THSM, through strategic hybridization, aligns innovation with geopolitical goals to enhance ecosystem resilience. THSM represents a Chinese mode that strategically coordinates state, industry, and academia to integrate technological advancement with diplomatic objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22290,"journal":{"name":"Telecommunications Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":"Article 103079"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145705462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}