This paper examines the evolving roles of states in content moderation and their complex relationships with social media platforms over time. As these platforms have become central to global communication, their interactions with governments have shaped content moderation in increasingly intricate ways. Despite the significance of these relationships, their chronological development and their implications remain insufficiently explored. This paper addresses this gap through an analysis of the annual reports of the United Nations’ Special Rapporteurs (SRs) on freedom of opinion and expression from 1995 to 2024. It traces the progressive entanglement between states and platforms, highlighting how governments have increasingly relied on platforms to enforce content moderation through both formal and informal mechanisms. The paper makes two key contributions: first, it provides a chronological account of how state involvement in content moderation has evolved; second, it categorizes types of state–platform relationships, distinguishing between formal and informal modes of influence as well as top-down, bottom-up, and collaborative interactions. Finally, it touches upon the geopolitical issues relating to state–platform relationships in a context where it is unclear whether platforms and governments share the same values of freedom and democracy anymore. By offering an empirical and chronological perspective, this study contributes to ongoing debates on platform governance and the issue of social media regulation.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
