<p>Some of the most important movies and books are trilogies – Asimov's ‘Foundation Trilogy’, Tolkien's ‘The Lord of the Rings’ or Coppola's ‘The Godfather Trilogy’ – in this issue, a trio of papers does the same for peanut, showing how a single polyploidization event gave rise to the crop, how the genetic variation for domestication traits was generated, and how a surprising degree of genomic instability continues in peanut today.</p><p>Polyploids are thought to typically derive from a swarm of incipient polyploids from two diverged genomes, allopolyploid (Figure 1) (Chester et al., <span>2012</span>; Vallejo-Marin et al., <span>2015</span>) or recurrently from unreduced gametes or spontaneous doubling within a single species, autopolyploid. Peanut, however, appears to have arisen from a single hybrid origin that gave rise to the domesticated species de Blas et al. (this issue). The authors used a SNP array to assay nearly all germplasm collected in <i>Arachis</i> section <i>Arachis</i> identifying an accession of <i>A. duranensis</i> from Rio Seco (K 30065) and <i>A. ipaënsis</i> (K 30076), of which only a single population was ever known, as the closest relatives of the A and B subgenomes of peanut, respectively. Thus, peanut's origin and its diploid progenitors, have been resolved in greater detail than any other ancient polyploid crop. The reproductive biology of peanut, they plant their own seeds (geocarpy), results in pseudoclonal populations that do not disperse broadly and can exist for 100 s or even 1000s of years allowing for these insights.</p><p>The extremely narrow genetic bottleneck of the polyploid origin then raises a paradox: How did peanut generate sufficient diversity for domestication? Genetic variation for domestication traits underlies the process of domestication, whereby, over generations, a suite of domestication-related traits is fixed in populations (Purugganan, <span>2019</span>). In the case of peanut, several diploid relatives had been cultivated, but it was the allotetraploid that became the primary domesticate with worldwide distribution. To explore this question, Lamon et al. (this issue 01188-2025) tracked synthetic neoallotetraploids of <i>A. duranensis</i> × <i>A. ipaënsis</i> and the diploid parents over five generations whilst selecting for seed size. Surprisingly, despite the extreme genetic bottleneck, the neoallotetraploids had stronger responses to selection. In addition, they observed extensive variation in the synthesized tetraploids for flower color, plant architecture, and other characteristics. To explore the question of why so much phenotypic variation was generated in a single-origin polyploid, they genotyped subsequent generations and found extensive dosage balance shifts due to homoeologous chromosomal exchanges (e.g., AABB to AAAA or BBBB). These experiments conclusively demonstrate how a single polyploid origin, the most extreme type of bottleneck, could lead to subsequent variation that allow
{"title":"A peanut trilogy: polyploid origin, domestication, and genomic instability","authors":"Scott A. Jackson","doi":"10.1111/tpj.70614","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tpj.70614","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some of the most important movies and books are trilogies – Asimov's ‘Foundation Trilogy’, Tolkien's ‘The Lord of the Rings’ or Coppola's ‘The Godfather Trilogy’ – in this issue, a trio of papers does the same for peanut, showing how a single polyploidization event gave rise to the crop, how the genetic variation for domestication traits was generated, and how a surprising degree of genomic instability continues in peanut today.</p><p>Polyploids are thought to typically derive from a swarm of incipient polyploids from two diverged genomes, allopolyploid (Figure 1) (Chester et al., <span>2012</span>; Vallejo-Marin et al., <span>2015</span>) or recurrently from unreduced gametes or spontaneous doubling within a single species, autopolyploid. Peanut, however, appears to have arisen from a single hybrid origin that gave rise to the domesticated species de Blas et al. (this issue). The authors used a SNP array to assay nearly all germplasm collected in <i>Arachis</i> section <i>Arachis</i> identifying an accession of <i>A. duranensis</i> from Rio Seco (K 30065) and <i>A. ipaënsis</i> (K 30076), of which only a single population was ever known, as the closest relatives of the A and B subgenomes of peanut, respectively. Thus, peanut's origin and its diploid progenitors, have been resolved in greater detail than any other ancient polyploid crop. The reproductive biology of peanut, they plant their own seeds (geocarpy), results in pseudoclonal populations that do not disperse broadly and can exist for 100 s or even 1000s of years allowing for these insights.</p><p>The extremely narrow genetic bottleneck of the polyploid origin then raises a paradox: How did peanut generate sufficient diversity for domestication? Genetic variation for domestication traits underlies the process of domestication, whereby, over generations, a suite of domestication-related traits is fixed in populations (Purugganan, <span>2019</span>). In the case of peanut, several diploid relatives had been cultivated, but it was the allotetraploid that became the primary domesticate with worldwide distribution. To explore this question, Lamon et al. (this issue 01188-2025) tracked synthetic neoallotetraploids of <i>A. duranensis</i> × <i>A. ipaënsis</i> and the diploid parents over five generations whilst selecting for seed size. Surprisingly, despite the extreme genetic bottleneck, the neoallotetraploids had stronger responses to selection. In addition, they observed extensive variation in the synthesized tetraploids for flower color, plant architecture, and other characteristics. To explore the question of why so much phenotypic variation was generated in a single-origin polyploid, they genotyped subsequent generations and found extensive dosage balance shifts due to homoeologous chromosomal exchanges (e.g., AABB to AAAA or BBBB). These experiments conclusively demonstrate how a single polyploid origin, the most extreme type of bottleneck, could lead to subsequent variation that allow","PeriodicalId":233,"journal":{"name":"The Plant Journal","volume":"124 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tpj.70614","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145825439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anne-Marie Pullen, Grant Billings, Charles Hodgens, Gisele White, Belinda S. Akpa, Marcela Rojas-Pierce
Understanding how plants regulate water loss is important for improving crop productivity. Tight control of stomatal opening and closing is essential for the uptake of CO2 while mitigating water vapor loss. The opening of stomata is regulated in part by homotypic vacuole fusion, which is mediated by conserved homotypic vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) and vacuolar SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptors) complexes. HOPS tethers apposing vacuole membranes and promotes the formation of trans-SNARE complexes to mediate fusion. In yeast, HOPS dissociates from the assembled SNARE complex to complete vacuole fusion, but little is known about this process in plants. HOPS-specific subunits VACUOLE PROTEIN SORTING39 (VPS39) and VPS41 are required for homotypic plant vacuole fusion, and a computational model predicted that post-translational modifications of HOPS may be needed for plant stomatal vacuole fusion. Here, we characterized a viable T-DNA insertion allele of VPS39 which demonstrated a critical role of VPS39 in stomatal vacuole fusion. We found that VPS39 has increased levels of phosphorylation at S413 when stomata are closed versus open, and that VPS39 function in stomata and embryonic development requires dynamic changes in phosphorylation. Among all HOPS and vacuolar SNARE subunits, only VPS39 showed differential levels of phosphorylation between open and closed stomata. Moreover, regions containing S413 are not conserved between plants and other organisms, suggesting plant-specific mechanisms. Our data are consistent with VPS39 phosphorylation altering vacuole dynamics in response to environmental cues, similar to well-established phosphorylation cascades that regulate ion transport during stomatal opening.
了解植物如何调节水分流失对提高作物产量很重要。严格控制气孔的开启和关闭对二氧化碳的吸收和减少水蒸气的损失是必不可少的。气孔的开启部分受同型液泡融合的调控,而同型液泡融合是由保守的同型液泡蛋白分选(HOPS)和液泡SNARE(可溶性n -乙基酰亚胺敏感因子附着蛋白受体)复合物介导的。啤酒花拴住液泡膜并促进跨snare复合物的形成以介导融合。在酵母中,啤酒花从组装好的SNARE复合体中解离以完成液泡融合,但对植物中的这一过程知之甚少。HOPS特异性亚基VACUOLE PROTEIN SORTING39 (VPS39)和VPS41是同源型植物液泡融合所必需的,一个计算模型预测,植物气孔液泡融合可能需要HOPS的翻译后修饰。在这里,我们鉴定了VPS39的一个活的T-DNA插入等位基因,证明了VPS39在气孔液泡融合中的关键作用。我们发现当气孔关闭时VPS39在S413位点的磷酸化水平比打开时升高,VPS39在气孔和胚胎发育中的功能需要磷酸化的动态变化。在所有的HOPS和液泡SNARE亚基中,只有VPS39在开气孔和闭气孔中表现出不同的磷酸化水平。此外,含有S413的区域在植物和其他生物之间并不保守,这可能是植物特有的机制。我们的数据与VPS39磷酸化改变液泡动态以响应环境线索的观点一致,类似于在气孔打开过程中调节离子运输的磷酸化级联反应。
{"title":"Regulation of vacuole fusion in stomata by dephosphorylation of the HOPS subunit VPS39","authors":"Anne-Marie Pullen, Grant Billings, Charles Hodgens, Gisele White, Belinda S. Akpa, Marcela Rojas-Pierce","doi":"10.1111/tpj.70640","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tpj.70640","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding how plants regulate water loss is important for improving crop productivity. Tight control of stomatal opening and closing is essential for the uptake of CO<sub>2</sub> while mitigating water vapor loss. The opening of stomata is regulated in part by homotypic vacuole fusion, which is mediated by conserved homotypic vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) and vacuolar SNARE (soluble <i>N</i>-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptors) complexes. HOPS tethers apposing vacuole membranes and promotes the formation of <i>trans</i>-SNARE complexes to mediate fusion. In yeast, HOPS dissociates from the assembled SNARE complex to complete vacuole fusion, but little is known about this process in plants. HOPS-specific subunits VACUOLE PROTEIN SORTING39 (VPS39) and VPS41 are required for homotypic plant vacuole fusion, and a computational model predicted that post-translational modifications of HOPS may be needed for plant stomatal vacuole fusion. Here, we characterized a viable T-DNA insertion allele of <i>VPS39</i> which demonstrated a critical role of VPS39 in stomatal vacuole fusion. We found that VPS39 has increased levels of phosphorylation at S413 when stomata are closed versus open, and that VPS39 function in stomata and embryonic development requires dynamic changes in phosphorylation. Among all HOPS and vacuolar SNARE subunits, only VPS39 showed differential levels of phosphorylation between open and closed stomata. Moreover, regions containing S413 are not conserved between plants and other organisms, suggesting plant-specific mechanisms. Our data are consistent with VPS39 phosphorylation altering vacuole dynamics in response to environmental cues, similar to well-established phosphorylation cascades that regulate ion transport during stomatal opening.</p>","PeriodicalId":233,"journal":{"name":"The Plant Journal","volume":"124 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12716901/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Janeen Braynen, Lifang Zhang, Sunita Kumari, Andrew Olson, Vivek Kumar, Michael Regulski, Christophe Liseron-Monfils, Allison Gaudinier, Anne-Maarit Bågman, Shane Abbitt, Mary J. Frank, Bo Shen, Leon Kochian, Siobhan M. Brady, Doreen Ware
Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient for plant growth and yield, yet optimizing nitrogen use efficiency remains a challenge in agriculture. To better understand the regulatory basis of plant responses to N availability, we constructed a maize-specific nitrogen uptake efficiency gene regulatory network (mNUEGRN) comprising 1625 protein–DNA interactions (PDI) between 70 promoters and 301 transcription factors using enhanced yeast one-hybrid assays. We also projected a sorghum NUE GRN (spNUEGRN) based on maize orthologs and analyzed N-responsive subnetworks in both species using transcriptome profiling under N stress of early deprivation and recovery. Cross-species comparison with an existing Arabidopsis GRN revealed about 18% conserved interaction, corresponding to 11% of the mNUEGRN, particularly within the nitrate assimilation pathways. Notably, bZIP18 and bZIP30 emerged as central regulators in mNUEGRN, forming highly connected feed-forward loops (FFLs). From our time series data, we identified 19 236 and 23 864 differentially expressed genes in maize and sorghum, respectively. Gini correlation analysis uncovered 764 and 638 FFLs in mNUEGRN and spNUEGRN, respectively, of which 22 FFLs in maize and 35 in sorghum were identified in both leaf and root for each species. These FFLs may represent candidate regulatory motifs that contribute to modulating transcriptional responses under fluctuating N conditions, but their potential roles require further investigation. Together, our findings reveal evolutionarily conserved and species-specific regulatory strategies that mediate early N responsiveness, offering a foundation for engineering crops with improved NUE.
{"title":"Decoding nitrogen uptake efficiency in maize and sorghum: insights from comparative gene regulatory networks","authors":"Janeen Braynen, Lifang Zhang, Sunita Kumari, Andrew Olson, Vivek Kumar, Michael Regulski, Christophe Liseron-Monfils, Allison Gaudinier, Anne-Maarit Bågman, Shane Abbitt, Mary J. Frank, Bo Shen, Leon Kochian, Siobhan M. Brady, Doreen Ware","doi":"10.1111/tpj.70631","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tpj.70631","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient for plant growth and yield, yet optimizing nitrogen use efficiency remains a challenge in agriculture. To better understand the regulatory basis of plant responses to N availability, we constructed a maize-specific nitrogen uptake efficiency gene regulatory network (mNUEGRN) comprising 1625 protein–DNA interactions (PDI) between 70 promoters and 301 transcription factors using enhanced yeast one-hybrid assays. We also projected a sorghum NUE GRN (spNUEGRN) based on maize orthologs and analyzed N-responsive subnetworks in both species using transcriptome profiling under N stress of early deprivation and recovery. Cross-species comparison with an existing Arabidopsis GRN revealed about 18% conserved interaction, corresponding to 11% of the mNUEGRN, particularly within the nitrate assimilation pathways. Notably, bZIP18 and bZIP30 emerged as central regulators in mNUEGRN, forming highly connected feed-forward loops (FFLs). From our time series data, we identified 19 236 and 23 864 differentially expressed genes in maize and sorghum, respectively. Gini correlation analysis uncovered 764 and 638 FFLs in mNUEGRN and spNUEGRN, respectively, of which 22 FFLs in maize and 35 in sorghum were identified in both leaf and root for each species. These FFLs may represent candidate regulatory motifs that contribute to modulating transcriptional responses under fluctuating N conditions, but their potential roles require further investigation. Together, our findings reveal evolutionarily conserved and species-specific regulatory strategies that mediate early N responsiveness, offering a foundation for engineering crops with improved NUE.</p>","PeriodicalId":233,"journal":{"name":"The Plant Journal","volume":"124 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12714369/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145779730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>In gymnosperms (‘naked seeds’ in ancient Greek), ovules are exposed, usually on the surface of cone scales. In flowering plants (angiosperms—‘enclosed seeds’); however, leaves evolved into carpels that folded over the ovules, fully enclosing them inside an ovary (Scutt et al., <span>2006</span>). This enclosure protects ovules from drying out, pests, and damage. It also controls which pollen tubes can reach the ovules and allows for the development of complex reproductive strategies such as double fertilization and fruit formation. Evolutionarily, this enclosure was a massive step that allowed plants to evolve more efficient and selective reproduction, leading to the incredible diversity of flowering plants today.</p><p>Ignacio Cota, first author of the highlighted publication, did his PhD in bacterial genetics but was always interested in plants. When a position became available in Soraya Pelaz's group at the Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, Barcelona, he took the opportunity to study a different and fascinating group of organisms. Pelaz studied developmental genetics using <i>Drosophila</i> during her PhD. She became interested in plant research when she realized that body patterning in <i>Drosophila</i> was in some ways similar to flower development, as in both systems, transcription factors act in overlapping spatial domains to confer organ identity: abdominal segments or legs in <i>Drosophila</i>, and petals or carpels in Arabidopsis flowers.</p><p>In Arabidopsis, different transcription factor families play crucial roles in regulating carpel development (Becker, <span>2020</span>). Although angiosperms appeared relatively suddenly in the fossil record, their evolutionary origins remain unresolved. Gymnosperms represent the only other extant group of seed plants, and interestingly, many genes related to floral organ development have gymnosperm orthologs (Scutt et al., <span>2006</span>). To investigate the evolution of gene families essential for carpel formation, Cota and colleagues tested whether gymnosperm homologs could substitute for their angiosperm counterparts in Arabidopsis (Cota et al., <span>2025</span>).</p><p><i>NGATHA</i> (<i>NGA</i>) genes in Arabidopsis have a redundant role in the formation of the style and stigma. They belong to the RAV family, characterized by the presence of a B3 DNA-binding domain (Romanel et al., <span>2009</span>). In Arabidopsis, there are seven <i>NGA</i> or <i>NGA</i>-related genes and six other <i>RAV</i> genes, which possess an additional AP2 domain. <i>NGA</i> genes are considered exclusive to angiosperms, whereas <i>RAV</i> genes with an AP2 domain appear in all streptophytes, including streptophyte algae, bryophytes, lycophytes, ferns, and seed plants (Romanel et al., <span>2009</span>). The authors selected <i>Ginkgo biloba</i> as their model gymnosperm because, among the available gymnosperm genomes at the time, Ginkgo possesses the fewest <i>RAV</i> gene homologs. Additionall
在裸子植物(古希腊语中的“裸种子”)中,胚珠暴露在外,通常在球果鳞片的表面。开花植物(被子植物——“封闭的种子”);然而,叶片进化成折叠在胚珠上的心皮,将胚珠完全包裹在子房内(Scutt et al., 2006)。这个外壳保护胚珠免受干燥、害虫和损害。它还控制哪些花粉管可以到达胚珠,并允许复杂生殖策略的发展,如双受精和果实形成。从进化的角度来看,这种封闭是一个巨大的进步,使植物能够进化出更高效、更有选择性的繁殖方式,导致了今天开花植物的惊人多样性。伊格纳西奥·科塔(Ignacio Cota)是这篇重点文章的第一作者,他获得了细菌遗传学博士学位,但一直对植物感兴趣。当巴塞罗那农业基因组学研究中心的索拉雅·佩拉兹(Soraya Pelaz)小组有了一个职位时,他抓住机会研究了一组不同的、令人着迷的生物。佩拉兹博士期间用果蝇研究发育遗传学。当她意识到果蝇的身体模式在某些方面与花的发育相似时,她开始对植物研究感兴趣,因为在这两个系统中,转录因子在重叠的空间域中起作用,以赋予器官身份:果蝇的腹部片段或腿,以及拟南芥花的花瓣或心皮。在拟南芥中,不同的转录因子家族在调节心皮发育中发挥关键作用(Becker, 2020)。尽管被子植物在化石记录中出现的时间相对较短,但它们的进化起源仍未得到解决。裸子植物是唯一现存的种子植物,有趣的是,许多与花器官发育相关的基因与裸子植物同源(Scutt et al., 2006)。为了研究心皮形成所必需的基因家族的进化,Cota及其同事测试了裸子植物同源物是否可以替代拟南芥中的被子植物(Cota et al., 2025)。NGATHA (NGA)基因在拟南芥花柱和柱头的形成中具有冗余作用。它们属于RAV家族,其特征是存在B3 dna结合结构域(Romanel et al., 2009)。在拟南芥中,有7个NGA或NGA相关基因和6个其他RAV基因,它们具有额外的AP2结构域。NGA基因被认为只存在于被子植物中,而带有AP2结构域的RAV基因出现在所有的链生植物中,包括链生藻类、苔藓植物、石松植物、蕨类植物和种子植物(Romanel et al., 2009)。作者选择银杏二叶作为裸子植物的模型,是因为在当时可用的裸子植物基因组中,银杏具有最少的RAV基因同源物。此外,研究人员受到银杏独特的系统发育地位及其“活化石”地位的启发,并受益于银杏树在研究中心外生长的实际优势,为实验材料提供了方便的来源。作者在银杏中鉴定出5个具有AP2结构域的RAVs。GbRAV5在拟南芥中的过度表达导致表型与拟南芥NGA基因的过度表达相似,包括侏儒症、茎系结、花瓣较少和短的硅片,并在远端具有典型的扩张。GbRAV5过表达恢复了拟南芥nga1 - nga3双突变体柱头的形成(图1a),表明GbRAV5在功能上等同于NGA因子。基本的螺旋-环-螺旋转录因子HECATE (HEC)和SPATULA (SPT)在控制柱头、花柱和传递道的整体生长中起关键作用。拟南芥的hec1 hec2 hec3三重突变体缺乏柱头组织(Crawford &; Yanofsky, 2011)。在银杏中,作者发现了一个单一的HEC基因。在拟南芥中,GbHEC的过表达诱导了由大量柱头组织组成的花序,并部分补充了hec1、hec2、hec3表型。银杏SPT同源基因的过度表达补充了拟南芥SPT突变体,其特征是心皮不融合和柱头组织数量减少。蟹爪(CRC)是一种YABBY (YAB)转录因子,也参与拟南芥心皮的形成(Gross et al., 2018)。然而,不同GbYABs的过表达并没有补充拟南芥crc突变表型,这表明crc与其他YAB基因的显著差异可能是心皮进化的关键创新。NGA和HEC蛋白与各种伙伴相互作用以执行其功能,包括INDEHISCENT (IND)和SPT。在拟南芥中,NGA-HEC二聚体在激活后与SPT和IND形成四聚体复合物,从而驱动柱头发育(Ballester et al, 2021)。 作者使用双分子荧光互补分析表明,这些蛋白-蛋白相互作用在银杏和拟南芥之间是保守的:GbRAV5和GbHEC蛋白与拟南芥NGA、HEC、IND和SPT蛋白相互作用。此外,我们分析了GbRAV5在拟南芥hec双突变体中的表达,因为NGA基因的组成表达已被证明依赖于拟南芥hec基因的存在。与此一致的是,与拟南芥HEC - nga调控关系类似,GbRAV5也需要HEC功能来建立柱头身份。考虑到GbRAV5和GbHEC蛋白在植物中相互作用,作者想知道这种相互作用是否会发生在银杏胚珠中。因此,他们通过原位杂交分析了银杏胚珠芽期、授粉前和授粉期的表达模式。授粉后不久,在雌配子体周围的珠心基部和被膜内层检测到GbRAV5的表达。GbHEC表达与GbRAV5表达重叠(图1b),表明这两个基因共同控制银杏雌性生殖结构。先前的研究表明,NGAs仅存在于被子植物中,这表明缺乏AP2结构域的NGAs与具有AP2和B3结构域的其他RAV家族成员之间存在明显的区分(Romanel et al., 2009)。然而,GbRAV5可以补充拟南芥中nga突变体的表型,挑战了这种区别。为了进一步研究这一点,作者构建了银杏和其他10种裸子植物RAV同源物的系统发育树。他们发现,在所有被测试的物种中,37种裸子RAV蛋白与NGA组合在一起,而不是与含有AP2结构域的RAV组合在一起。值得注意的是,除了银杏和苏铁外,所有与典型NGA聚集的裸子植物蛋白都表现出部分退化或缺失AP2结构域,使其结构域组织与被子植物NGA蛋白越来越相似。在拟南芥nga1 - nga3双突变体中过表达3种裸子植物的RAV5同源物恢复了两种情况下花柱和柱头的形成。此外,过表达不含AP2结构域的GbRAV5仍能恢复nga1的nga3表型,这表明AP2结构域对于nga相关表型的诱导是不可或缺的。作者认为AP2结构域的平行丢失特别引人注目,因为它提供了对进化过程中间阶段的罕见一瞥:在这种情况下,蛋白质结构域的丢失。这种中间产物可能在进化上不稳定且寿命短,因此在许多裸子植物基因中存在部分AP2结构域尤其值得注意。
{"title":"Coding the carpel: evolutionary roots of NGATHA genes in seed plants","authors":"Gwendolyn K. Kirschner","doi":"10.1111/tpj.70645","DOIUrl":"10.1111/tpj.70645","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In gymnosperms (‘naked seeds’ in ancient Greek), ovules are exposed, usually on the surface of cone scales. In flowering plants (angiosperms—‘enclosed seeds’); however, leaves evolved into carpels that folded over the ovules, fully enclosing them inside an ovary (Scutt et al., <span>2006</span>). This enclosure protects ovules from drying out, pests, and damage. It also controls which pollen tubes can reach the ovules and allows for the development of complex reproductive strategies such as double fertilization and fruit formation. Evolutionarily, this enclosure was a massive step that allowed plants to evolve more efficient and selective reproduction, leading to the incredible diversity of flowering plants today.</p><p>Ignacio Cota, first author of the highlighted publication, did his PhD in bacterial genetics but was always interested in plants. When a position became available in Soraya Pelaz's group at the Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, Barcelona, he took the opportunity to study a different and fascinating group of organisms. Pelaz studied developmental genetics using <i>Drosophila</i> during her PhD. She became interested in plant research when she realized that body patterning in <i>Drosophila</i> was in some ways similar to flower development, as in both systems, transcription factors act in overlapping spatial domains to confer organ identity: abdominal segments or legs in <i>Drosophila</i>, and petals or carpels in Arabidopsis flowers.</p><p>In Arabidopsis, different transcription factor families play crucial roles in regulating carpel development (Becker, <span>2020</span>). Although angiosperms appeared relatively suddenly in the fossil record, their evolutionary origins remain unresolved. Gymnosperms represent the only other extant group of seed plants, and interestingly, many genes related to floral organ development have gymnosperm orthologs (Scutt et al., <span>2006</span>). To investigate the evolution of gene families essential for carpel formation, Cota and colleagues tested whether gymnosperm homologs could substitute for their angiosperm counterparts in Arabidopsis (Cota et al., <span>2025</span>).</p><p><i>NGATHA</i> (<i>NGA</i>) genes in Arabidopsis have a redundant role in the formation of the style and stigma. They belong to the RAV family, characterized by the presence of a B3 DNA-binding domain (Romanel et al., <span>2009</span>). In Arabidopsis, there are seven <i>NGA</i> or <i>NGA</i>-related genes and six other <i>RAV</i> genes, which possess an additional AP2 domain. <i>NGA</i> genes are considered exclusive to angiosperms, whereas <i>RAV</i> genes with an AP2 domain appear in all streptophytes, including streptophyte algae, bryophytes, lycophytes, ferns, and seed plants (Romanel et al., <span>2009</span>). The authors selected <i>Ginkgo biloba</i> as their model gymnosperm because, among the available gymnosperm genomes at the time, Ginkgo possesses the fewest <i>RAV</i> gene homologs. Additionall","PeriodicalId":233,"journal":{"name":"The Plant Journal","volume":"124 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tpj.70645","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145761570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}