Pub Date : 2021-06-22DOI: 10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0001
J. Montero
abstract:Herrera's commented edition of Garcilaso de la Vega's works advances an innovative formula in comparison to El Brocense's edition in material and editorial aspects. Our analysis shows that with those innovations Herrera strove to underscore his authorial role (against Garcilaso and El Brocense) and his attempt to hijack the leadership of Spanish letters with the help of the group of Seville learned men who supported him. Under his nationalist discourse lurks, therefore, controversy and the rivalry between regional groups (Andalusians against Castilians) and social tiers (men of letters against nobles).resumen:La edición comentada de Garcilaso por Herrera propone una fórmula innovadora con respecto a la del Brocense en aspectos materiales y editoriales. El análisis muestra que tales innovaciones pretenden resaltar el papel autorial de Herrera—frente a Garcilaso y frente al Brocense—, así como su pretensión de asumir el liderazgo de las letras españolas, con el apoyo del grupo de literatos sevillanos que lo secundan. Bajo el discurso nacionalista del libro se esconde, por tanto, la polémica y el enfrentamiento entre grupos regionales (andaluces frente a castellanos) y estamentales (hombres de letras frente a caballeros).
摘要:Herrera的评论版Garcilaso de la Vega的作品提出了一个创新的公式，与El Brocense的版本在材料和编辑方面的比较。我们的分析表明，通过这些创新，埃雷拉试图削弱他的权威角色(反对加尔西拉索和埃尔·布罗森斯)，并试图在塞维利亚集团的帮助下夺取西班牙信件的领导地位。在他的民族主义演讲下，地区团体(安达卢西亚人反对卡斯提尔人)和社会团体(文人反对贵族)之间的争议和竞争。摘要:由Herrera编辑的Garcilaso评论版在材料和编辑方面提出了一个创新的公式。本文分析了埃雷拉在西班牙文学中所扮演的角色，以及他在塞维利亚文人群体的支持下所扮演的领导角色。因此，在这本书的民族主义话语背后，隐藏着地区团体(安达卢西亚人对卡斯提尔人)和政府团体(文人对绅士)之间的争论和对抗。
{"title":"Las Anotaciones de Herrera a Garcilaso como texto polémico: Aspectos materiales, editoriales y autoriales / Herrera's Anotaciones to Garcilaso as a Polemical Text: Material, Editorial and Authorial Aspects","authors":"J. Montero","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0001","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Herrera's commented edition of Garcilaso de la Vega's works advances an innovative formula in comparison to El Brocense's edition in material and editorial aspects. Our analysis shows that with those innovations Herrera strove to underscore his authorial role (against Garcilaso and El Brocense) and his attempt to hijack the leadership of Spanish letters with the help of the group of Seville learned men who supported him. Under his nationalist discourse lurks, therefore, controversy and the rivalry between regional groups (Andalusians against Castilians) and social tiers (men of letters against nobles).resumen:La edición comentada de Garcilaso por Herrera propone una fórmula innovadora con respecto a la del Brocense en aspectos materiales y editoriales. El análisis muestra que tales innovaciones pretenden resaltar el papel autorial de Herrera—frente a Garcilaso y frente al Brocense—, así como su pretensión de asumir el liderazgo de las letras españolas, con el apoyo del grupo de literatos sevillanos que lo secundan. Bajo el discurso nacionalista del libro se esconde, por tanto, la polémica y el enfrentamiento entre grupos regionales (andaluces frente a castellanos) y estamentales (hombres de letras frente a caballeros).","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72473728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-22DOI: 10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0019
M. D'agostino
abstract:Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola never took part in the polemic typical of his own time, but this attitude did not prevent him from expressing his disapproval of Góngora. Thus far critics have always thought that Bartolomé had not commented on the greatest literary scandal of that time: the Soledades. However, a more careful analysis of his texts highlights how Argensola fiercely criticized Gongora's poem, even stating—although in Horatian mode—that poetry had become a monster, referring precisely to the verses in which Góngora offers one of the best proves of his genius: the dedication to the Duke of Béjar.resumen:Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola no participó en las "batallas de plumas" que se combatieron en su época, pero esto no le impidió expresar su desaprobación tanto de Lope como de Góngora. La crítica ha subrayado siempre que Bartolomé no llegó nunca a manifestarse sobre el mayor escándalo literario de la época: las Soledades. Sin embargo, una lectura más atenta de algunos de sus textos evidencia que el poeta aragonés juzgó severamente el poema gongorino, llegando a sostener, si bien more horaciano, que la poesía se había transformado en un monstruo, tomando como referencia precisamente los versos en que Góngora ofrece una de las pruebas más audaces de su genio poético: la dedicatoria al duque de Béjar.
{"title":"Poética y polémica en la poesía de Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola / Poetic and Polemic in Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola's Poetry","authors":"M. D'agostino","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0019","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola never took part in the polemic typical of his own time, but this attitude did not prevent him from expressing his disapproval of Góngora. Thus far critics have always thought that Bartolomé had not commented on the greatest literary scandal of that time: the Soledades. However, a more careful analysis of his texts highlights how Argensola fiercely criticized Gongora's poem, even stating—although in Horatian mode—that poetry had become a monster, referring precisely to the verses in which Góngora offers one of the best proves of his genius: the dedication to the Duke of Béjar.resumen:Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola no participó en las \"batallas de plumas\" que se combatieron en su época, pero esto no le impidió expresar su desaprobación tanto de Lope como de Góngora. La crítica ha subrayado siempre que Bartolomé no llegó nunca a manifestarse sobre el mayor escándalo literario de la época: las Soledades. Sin embargo, una lectura más atenta de algunos de sus textos evidencia que el poeta aragonés juzgó severamente el poema gongorino, llegando a sostener, si bien more horaciano, que la poesía se había transformado en un monstruo, tomando como referencia precisamente los versos en que Góngora ofrece una de las pruebas más audaces de su genio poético: la dedicatoria al duque de Béjar.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89834598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-22DOI: 10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0158
Manuel Ángel Candelas Colodrón
abstract:The article pretends to narrate the process of enrichment of the Parnassus frame during the seventeenthcentury(until 1672) and to study the immediate impact of the decision of González de Salas or Quevedo to distributing his poems in nine muses among his contemporary poets. In particular, our study examines the decision of three poets that can be deemed peripheric, but that will cultivate this generic distinction, albeit not without some degree of controversy or reflection from Lisbon, Francisco Manuel de Melo; from Amsterdam, Miguel de Barrios; and from Cagliari (José Delitala).resumen:El artículo pretende historiar el proceso de enriquecimiento del marco parnaseo durante el siglo XVII (hasta 1672) y detenerme en el impacto inmediato de la decisión de González de Salas o de Quevedo de dividir sus poesías en nueve musas entre algunos poetas contemporáneos. En concreto, el trabajo se detendrá en tres poetas que pueden ser calificados como periféricos pero que van a cultivar esa distinción genérica, no sin controversia o reflexión, desde Lisboa, Francisco Manuel de Melo; desde Amsterdam, Miguel de Barrios; y desde Cagliari (José Delitala).
{"title":"Apolos, musas y Parnasos: La controversia sobre la distribución de las obras en los libros de poesías / Apollos, Muses, and Parnassus: The Controversy Surrounding Poem Distribution in Poetry Books","authors":"Manuel Ángel Candelas Colodrón","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0158","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The article pretends to narrate the process of enrichment of the Parnassus frame during the seventeenthcentury(until 1672) and to study the immediate impact of the decision of González de Salas or Quevedo to distributing his poems in nine muses among his contemporary poets. In particular, our study examines the decision of three poets that can be deemed peripheric, but that will cultivate this generic distinction, albeit not without some degree of controversy or reflection from Lisbon, Francisco Manuel de Melo; from Amsterdam, Miguel de Barrios; and from Cagliari (José Delitala).resumen:El artículo pretende historiar el proceso de enriquecimiento del marco parnaseo durante el siglo XVII (hasta 1672) y detenerme en el impacto inmediato de la decisión de González de Salas o de Quevedo de dividir sus poesías en nueve musas entre algunos poetas contemporáneos. En concreto, el trabajo se detendrá en tres poetas que pueden ser calificados como periféricos pero que van a cultivar esa distinción genérica, no sin controversia o reflexión, desde Lisboa, Francisco Manuel de Melo; desde Amsterdam, Miguel de Barrios; y desde Cagliari (José Delitala).","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84354182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-22DOI: 10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0124
Juan Manuel Daza
abstract:Góngora´s defenders on the debate about the Soledades held that the Cordoban poet had achieved that the Spanish poetic language equaled the greatness of Latin and therefore has reached its full maturity. This fact is the result of a progressive dignifying process in which Garcilaso and Mena had a crucial role, whose innovative wits were used as an example to justify Góngora´s innovation, even though Góngora´s superiority over his predecessors might be assumed.resumen:Los defensores de Góngora en el debate en torno a las Soledades sostuvieron que el poeta cordobés había conseguido que la lengua poética española igualara la grandeza del latín y, por tanto, alcanzara su plena madurez. Este hecho es resultado de un proceso de dignificación progresiva en el que tuvieron mucho peso Mena y Garcilaso, ingenios innovadores cuyo ejemplo se usó para justificar la innovación gongorina, aunque se asuma la superioridad de Góngora respecto a sus antecedentes.
abstract:敬佩´s维护者about the Soledades辩论举行that the Cordoban poet为此一that the [poetic language equaled greatness of Latin和你的问题上,其全成熟度。这一事实是一个渐进的尊严过程的结果，在这个过程中，加尔西拉索和梅纳发挥了至关重要的作用，他们的创新智慧被用作证明gongora的创新的例子，尽管gongora比他的前任更优越。摘要:在关于孤独的辩论中，gongora的支持者认为，这位科尔多瓦诗人成功地使西班牙诗歌语言与拉丁语的伟大相对应，从而达到了完全成熟。这一事实是一个渐进式尊严过程的结果，在这个过程中，Mena和Garcilaso发挥了很大的作用，他们的例子被用来证明gongorine的创新，尽管gongora比他的前辈更优越。
{"title":"Góngora ante la tradición poética española: La invención gongorina al trasluz de Mena y Garcilaso / Góngora and the Spanish Poetic Tradition: Gongoresque Inventions in the Light of Mena and Garcilaso","authors":"Juan Manuel Daza","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0124","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Góngora´s defenders on the debate about the Soledades held that the Cordoban poet had achieved that the Spanish poetic language equaled the greatness of Latin and therefore has reached its full maturity. This fact is the result of a progressive dignifying process in which Garcilaso and Mena had a crucial role, whose innovative wits were used as an example to justify Góngora´s innovation, even though Góngora´s superiority over his predecessors might be assumed.resumen:Los defensores de Góngora en el debate en torno a las Soledades sostuvieron que el poeta cordobés había conseguido que la lengua poética española igualara la grandeza del latín y, por tanto, alcanzara su plena madurez. Este hecho es resultado de un proceso de dignificación progresiva en el que tuvieron mucho peso Mena y Garcilaso, ingenios innovadores cuyo ejemplo se usó para justificar la innovación gongorina, aunque se asuma la superioridad de Góngora respecto a sus antecedentes.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84555904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-06-22DOI: 10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.000V
J. Montero, Antonio Sánchez Jiménez
{"title":"Nota Editorial / Editorial Note","authors":"J. Montero, Antonio Sánchez Jiménez","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.000V","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.000V","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89021465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-01DOI: 10.5325/caliope.26.1.0178
Sarah Finley
{"title":"The Routledge Research Companion to the Works of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz ed. by Emilie L. Bergmann and Stacey Schlau (review)","authors":"Sarah Finley","doi":"10.5325/caliope.26.1.0178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.26.1.0178","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82155233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-01DOI: 10.5325/caliope.26.1.0192
Justyna Olko
One of the most fascinating known works from colonial Mexico was penned by Hernando Ruiz de Alarcón, a devout priest deeply committed to extirpating idolatry among his parishioners in the town of Atenango del Río, in a remote mountainous region of Chilapa in the present state of Guerrero. His Tratado de supersticiones y costumbres gentílicas que oy viuen entre los indios naturales desta Nueva España (1629) has become a popular object of much scholarly scrutiny over the last several decades. Written in Spanish but containing ritual incantations in Nahuatl, it is a vivid testimony of the strength of preconquest beliefs, which survived despite more than one hundred years of Christianization efforts. The Nahuatl incantations recorded by Alarcón designate different beings and entities with names expressed in a very complex ritual language, often referring to deities and other sacred beings who were called forth in order to bring about the effects desired by the petitioners involved in the ritual. While there are numerous testimonies contradicting the Spanish propaganda—and an enduring academic myth!—regarding the success and efficiency of Christian instruction in colonial New Spain, Alarcón’s account of idolatrous practices and incantations, in fact salvaged by him from total erasure, attests to the integrity of indigenous ritual and worldview. This integrity, based on local ontology and epistemology, as argued by Díaz Balsera, is indeed retrievable despite having been forced into the repressive paradigm and ideological framework of a Spaniard who claimed religious and cultural superiority and saw the indigenous people as “recalcitrant backsliders” and “ hypocritical, cunning idolaters” (5). In what is undoubtedly a novelty in existing scholarship, the study by Díaz Balsera shows how Spaniards perceived, understood, and classified Mesoamerican practices according to their own ontological perspective and a discriminating colonial mindset. She examines the “demonological mindset of Spanish colonizers and ecclesiastics” as well as its roots in early modern Christian epistemology, permeated with beliefs in the “animated realm of the occult” (4). By probing this part of the European culture of the epoch, Díaz Balsera explains how these paradigms provided an essential lens for viewing and translating indigenous
墨西哥殖民时期最引人入胜的作品之一是由Hernando Ruiz de Alarcón撰写的，他是一位虔诚的牧师，致力于消除他在Atenango del Río镇的教区居民中的偶像崇拜，该镇位于现在的格雷罗州的奇拉帕偏远山区。在过去的几十年里，他的《关于迷信和服饰的论文集》gentílicas(1629年)已经成为一个受欢迎的学术研究对象。它是用西班牙语写成的，但包含了纳瓦特尔语的仪式咒语，它生动地证明了征服前信仰的力量，尽管经过了一百多年的基督教化努力，它仍然存在。Alarcón记录的纳瓦特尔咒语指定了不同的存在和实体，它们的名字用非常复杂的仪式语言表达，通常指的是神和其他神圣的存在，他们被召唤出来，以实现参与仪式的请愿者所期望的效果。然而，有许多证据与西班牙的宣传相矛盾——这是一个持久的学术神话!-关于基督教教育在殖民地新西班牙的成功和效率，Alarcón对偶像崇拜和咒语的描述，实际上是由他从完全抹去中拯救出来的，证明了土著仪式和世界观的完整性。正如Díaz Balsera所主张的那样，这种基于本地本体论和认识论的完整性确实是可以恢复的，尽管它被迫进入了一个声称宗教和文化优越性的西班牙人的压抑范式和意识形态框架，并将土著人民视为“顽固不化的退行者”和“虚伪、狡猾的偶像崇拜者”(5)。在现有的学术研究中，Díaz Balsera的研究无疑是一种新奇，它显示了西班牙人如何感知、理解、并根据他们自己的本体论观点和歧视性的殖民心态对中美洲的做法进行分类。她研究了“西班牙殖民者和神职人员的恶魔心态”，以及它在早期现代基督教认识论中的根源，渗透着“神秘的动画领域”的信仰(4)。通过探索这个时代欧洲文化的这一部分，Díaz Balsera解释了这些范式如何为观察和翻译土著文化提供了一个重要的视角
{"title":"Guardians of Idolatry: God, Demons, and Priests in Hernando Ruiz de Alarcón's Treatise on the Heathen Superstitions by Viviana Díaz Balsera (review)","authors":"Justyna Olko","doi":"10.5325/caliope.26.1.0192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.26.1.0192","url":null,"abstract":"One of the most fascinating known works from colonial Mexico was penned by Hernando Ruiz de Alarcón, a devout priest deeply committed to extirpating idolatry among his parishioners in the town of Atenango del Río, in a remote mountainous region of Chilapa in the present state of Guerrero. His Tratado de supersticiones y costumbres gentílicas que oy viuen entre los indios naturales desta Nueva España (1629) has become a popular object of much scholarly scrutiny over the last several decades. Written in Spanish but containing ritual incantations in Nahuatl, it is a vivid testimony of the strength of preconquest beliefs, which survived despite more than one hundred years of Christianization efforts. The Nahuatl incantations recorded by Alarcón designate different beings and entities with names expressed in a very complex ritual language, often referring to deities and other sacred beings who were called forth in order to bring about the effects desired by the petitioners involved in the ritual. While there are numerous testimonies contradicting the Spanish propaganda—and an enduring academic myth!—regarding the success and efficiency of Christian instruction in colonial New Spain, Alarcón’s account of idolatrous practices and incantations, in fact salvaged by him from total erasure, attests to the integrity of indigenous ritual and worldview. This integrity, based on local ontology and epistemology, as argued by Díaz Balsera, is indeed retrievable despite having been forced into the repressive paradigm and ideological framework of a Spaniard who claimed religious and cultural superiority and saw the indigenous people as “recalcitrant backsliders” and “ hypocritical, cunning idolaters” (5). In what is undoubtedly a novelty in existing scholarship, the study by Díaz Balsera shows how Spaniards perceived, understood, and classified Mesoamerican practices according to their own ontological perspective and a discriminating colonial mindset. She examines the “demonological mindset of Spanish colonizers and ecclesiastics” as well as its roots in early modern Christian epistemology, permeated with beliefs in the “animated realm of the occult” (4). By probing this part of the European culture of the epoch, Díaz Balsera explains how these paradigms provided an essential lens for viewing and translating indigenous","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78805529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-10DOI: 10.5325/caliope.25.2.0127
J. García
abstract:Escolios contra Juan Baptista Pérez (c. 1594) is the shortened title of a burlesque work attributed to Juan Sáez de Zumeta, which remains unpublished in three known manuscripts. One of these, compiled by Porras de la Cámara, gives the news about the existence of the academy of San Vicente in Seville, where these Escolios were written. This article describes these testimonies and examines the structure of the piece and the different discursive modalities of the burlesque it shows. It also identifies the abovementioned academy with the burlesque literature produced in Seville in this period.resumen:Escolios contra Juan Baptista Pérez (c. 1594) es el título abreviado de una obra burlesca atribuida a Juan Sáez de Zumeta que permanece inédita en tres manuscritos conocidos. Uno de tales testimonios, compilado por Porras de la Cámara, ofrece en sus glosas la noticia de la academia de San Vicente en Sevilla, donde se originaron estos Escolios. Se describen los testimonios y se examinan la estructura del conjunto y las modalidades discursivas que lo integran. También se identifica la referida academia y se contextualiza en la producción burlesca de la Sevilla de entresiglos.
摘要:《胡安·巴普蒂斯塔·psamurez》(约1594年)是胡安·Sáez·德·祖梅塔的一部滑稽作品的缩写，至今仍未在三份已知手稿中发表。其中一份由Porras de la Cámara编辑，提供了关于塞维利亚圣维森特学院存在的消息，这些学校就是在那里写的。本文描述了这些证词，并考察了作品的结构和它所显示的滑稽戏的不同话语模式。它还将上述学院与这一时期在塞维利亚产生的滑稽剧文学联系起来。个人资料:与胡安·巴普蒂斯塔·帕姆雷斯的关系(约1594年)是关于título与胡安·巴普蒂斯塔·帕姆雷斯的关系的简写Sáez与胡安·巴普蒂斯塔·帕姆雷斯的关系的简写。Uno de tales证词，汇编穷人的Porras de la Cámara，圣维森特和塞维利亚的学术通报，donde se originaron estos escolio。她通过对结构模型的考察，描述了这些证据，这些结构模型是由三个模态、话语模型和整体模型结合而成的。tamamicassi认为，通过将其背景化，可以在学术界进行鉴定producción塞维利亚企业的经济活动。
{"title":"Los Escolios contra Juan Baptista Pérez y la academia burlesca de San Vicente en Sevilla / The Escolios contra Baptista Pérez and the burlesque academy of San Vicente in Seville: A Valentín Núñez Rivera","authors":"J. García","doi":"10.5325/caliope.25.2.0127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.25.2.0127","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Escolios contra Juan Baptista Pérez (c. 1594) is the shortened title of a burlesque work attributed to Juan Sáez de Zumeta, which remains unpublished in three known manuscripts. One of these, compiled by Porras de la Cámara, gives the news about the existence of the academy of San Vicente in Seville, where these Escolios were written. This article describes these testimonies and examines the structure of the piece and the different discursive modalities of the burlesque it shows. It also identifies the abovementioned academy with the burlesque literature produced in Seville in this period.resumen:Escolios contra Juan Baptista Pérez (c. 1594) es el título abreviado de una obra burlesca atribuida a Juan Sáez de Zumeta que permanece inédita en tres manuscritos conocidos. Uno de tales testimonios, compilado por Porras de la Cámara, ofrece en sus glosas la noticia de la academia de San Vicente en Sevilla, donde se originaron estos Escolios. Se describen los testimonios y se examinan la estructura del conjunto y las modalidades discursivas que lo integran. También se identifica la referida academia y se contextualiza en la producción burlesca de la Sevilla de entresiglos.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78896682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-10DOI: 10.5325/caliope.25.2.0208
M. M. Navarro
abstract:Even before Philip III created the Immaculate Conception Royal Committee in 1616, a fervent promotion and defense of the dogma of Virgin Mary’s Immaculate Conception were carried out, resulting in a series of poems of circumstance devoted to this doctrine that proliferated through the Baroque period. A sample of that intense literary activity is La Aurora de Cristo, a narrative epic poem written that same year by Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez, who was from Seville. This paper focuses on this work as a reflection of a moment of maximum apogee of the Marianist spirit lived in the Andalusian city.resumen:Antes de que Felipe III creara en 1616 una Real Junta de la Inmaculada, ya se llevaron a cabo una ferviente promoción y defensa del dogma de la Inmaculada Concepción de la Virgen, dando como fruto una serie de poemas de circunstancia sobre esta temática que fueron frecuentes durante todo el Barroco. Una muestra de aquella intensa actividad literaria es La Aurora de Cristo, un poema épico narrativo escrito en ese mismo año por el sevillano Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez, obra en la que centraremos este estudio como reflejo de un momento de máximo apogeo marianista en la capital hispalense.
摘要:甚至在1616年菲利普三世成立无玷受孕皇家委员会之前，对圣母玛利亚无玷受孕教义的热烈宣传和辩护就已经进行了，结果是一系列的诗歌致力于这一教义，并在巴洛克时期大量传播。A sample of that intense literary activity is基督的极光,narrative epic poem书面that same年by Luis Belmonte bermudez, who was from塞维利亚。This paper的on This work as a reflection of a巴拉克of maximum apogee of the Marianist spirit一起in the Andalusian城。摘要:在菲利普三世创建1616只是一个概念,委员会已经开展了一个虔诚法则的瞻礼日,促进和保护圣母,由于一系列诗歌被频繁的情况下这方面整个巴洛克。这种激烈的文学活动的一个例子是《基督的黎明》(La Aurora de Cristo)，这是塞维利亚人路易斯·德·贝尔蒙特(Luis de Belmonte)在同一年创作的叙情史诗bermudez，我们将重点研究这部作品，因为它反映了西班牙首都玛丽安派的鼎盛时期。
{"title":"El tratamiento literario de la causa inmaculista en La Aurora de Cristo (1616) de Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez / The Immaculate Conception in Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez’s La Aurora de Cristo (1616)","authors":"M. M. Navarro","doi":"10.5325/caliope.25.2.0208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.25.2.0208","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Even before Philip III created the Immaculate Conception Royal Committee in 1616, a fervent promotion and defense of the dogma of Virgin Mary’s Immaculate Conception were carried out, resulting in a series of poems of circumstance devoted to this doctrine that proliferated through the Baroque period. A sample of that intense literary activity is La Aurora de Cristo, a narrative epic poem written that same year by Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez, who was from Seville. This paper focuses on this work as a reflection of a moment of maximum apogee of the Marianist spirit lived in the Andalusian city.resumen:Antes de que Felipe III creara en 1616 una Real Junta de la Inmaculada, ya se llevaron a cabo una ferviente promoción y defensa del dogma de la Inmaculada Concepción de la Virgen, dando como fruto una serie de poemas de circunstancia sobre esta temática que fueron frecuentes durante todo el Barroco. Una muestra de aquella intensa actividad literaria es La Aurora de Cristo, un poema épico narrativo escrito en ese mismo año por el sevillano Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez, obra en la que centraremos este estudio como reflejo de un momento de máximo apogeo marianista en la capital hispalense.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81601126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-10DOI: 10.5325/caliope.25.2.0233
I. Osuna
abstract:Encomio de los ingenios sevillanos is a collection of poems from a poetic contest honoring Saint Ignatius of Loyola and Saint Francis Xavier, promoted in Seville by an influential corporation in the commercial field. Juan Antonio de Ibarra’s presentation of the poems in this collection has several meta-literary considerations. The celebration of the contest by the initiative of this civil corporation, several editorial details in the book or its author’s literary links and interests allows us to contextualize the prominence of this meta-literary component and its main purpose: the exaltation of current local poets, continuing with the brilliant trajectory in Seville.resumen:El Encomio de los ingenios sevillanos recoge un certamen poético en honor de san Ignacio de Loyola y san Francisco Javier, promovido en Sevilla por una influyente corporación en el ámbito comercial. Juan Antonio de Ibarra presenta los poemas dentro de un discurso con numerosas consideraciones metaliterarias. La celebración del certamen por iniciativa de esa corporación civil, varios detalles editoriales del libro o los contactos e intereses literarios de su autor permiten contextualizar el protagonismo de ese componente metaliterario y su principal propósito: la exaltación de los poetas locales del momento, en continuidad con la brillante trayectoria sevillana previa.
摘要:《塞维利亚少年诗选》是塞维利亚一个有影响力的商业公司为纪念洛约拉的圣依纳爵和圣方济各·泽维尔而举办的诗歌比赛的诗集。胡安·安东尼奥·德·伊巴拉对诗集中的诗歌的介绍有几个元文学方面的考虑。由民间团体发起的庆祝活动，书中的一些编辑细节，或作者的文学联系和兴趣，让我们能够将这种元文学成分的突出地位及其主要目的置于背景中:提高当前当地诗人的地位，延续塞维利亚的辉煌轨迹。简历:塞维利亚青年青年奖学金表彰圣伊格纳西奥·德·洛约拉和旧金山·哈维尔的某些奖学金，促进塞维利亚贫困的una influyente corporación en El ámbito商业。胡安·安东尼奥·德·伊巴拉提出了他的诗作《论的本质》。La exaltación de los poetas locales del momento, en continuidad con La briillante trayectoria sevillana previa, La exaltación de los poetas locales del momento, La exaltación de los poetas locales del momento, en continuidad con La briillante trayectoria sevillana previa。
{"title":"El Encomio de los ingenios sevillanos, en la fiesta de los santos Inacio de Loyola y Francisco Javier (1623), de Juan Antonio de Ibarra","authors":"I. Osuna","doi":"10.5325/caliope.25.2.0233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.25.2.0233","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Encomio de los ingenios sevillanos is a collection of poems from a poetic contest honoring Saint Ignatius of Loyola and Saint Francis Xavier, promoted in Seville by an influential corporation in the commercial field. Juan Antonio de Ibarra’s presentation of the poems in this collection has several meta-literary considerations. The celebration of the contest by the initiative of this civil corporation, several editorial details in the book or its author’s literary links and interests allows us to contextualize the prominence of this meta-literary component and its main purpose: the exaltation of current local poets, continuing with the brilliant trajectory in Seville.resumen:El Encomio de los ingenios sevillanos recoge un certamen poético en honor de san Ignacio de Loyola y san Francisco Javier, promovido en Sevilla por una influyente corporación en el ámbito comercial. Juan Antonio de Ibarra presenta los poemas dentro de un discurso con numerosas consideraciones metaliterarias. La celebración del certamen por iniciativa de esa corporación civil, varios detalles editoriales del libro o los contactos e intereses literarios de su autor permiten contextualizar el protagonismo de ese componente metaliterario y su principal propósito: la exaltación de los poetas locales del momento, en continuidad con la brillante trayectoria sevillana previa.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77356409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：