Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.2
S. Wahyuningtyas
The role of patents is complex when dealing with the problem of technological interoperability in cases where patented technology becomes standard. In such cases, a balance is needed between the protection of the interests of the inventor, i.e. the standard essential patent (SEP) holder, and of users who need the technology to enter the market. There is a susceptibility to restrictions on competition to create markets (competition for the market). Market dominance can be created by the adoption of SEP holder technology as a standard and hence, a key for other business actors to enter the market. With the potential for the formation of a dominant position in the relevant market, the competition law intervention is required when patent abuse occurs, as it appears typical in the pharmaceutical and information technology industries. The normative research examines how competition law in the European Union deals with SEP cases in comparison to Indonesian competition law.
{"title":"PEMBATASAN TERHADAP PERSAINGAN UNTUK MEMBENTUK PASAR DALAM KASUS STANDARD ESSENTIAL PATENT (SEP) (PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA DAN UNI EROPA)","authors":"S. Wahyuningtyas","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.2","url":null,"abstract":"The role of patents is complex when dealing with the problem of technological interoperability in cases where patented technology becomes standard. In such cases, a balance is needed between the protection of the interests of the inventor, i.e. the standard essential patent (SEP) holder, and of users who need the technology to enter the market. There is a susceptibility to restrictions on competition to create markets (competition for the market). Market dominance can be created by the adoption of SEP holder technology as a standard and hence, a key for other business actors to enter the market. With the potential for the formation of a dominant position in the relevant market, the competition law intervention is required when patent abuse occurs, as it appears typical in the pharmaceutical and information technology industries. The normative research examines how competition law in the European Union deals with SEP cases in comparison to Indonesian competition law.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41264500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.9
A. Kartika
The existence of the House of Representatives (DPD) in including regional inputs in the form of norms has experienced polemics. These polemics include the decisions of the State Administrative Court (PTUN), the Supreme Court (MA), and the Constitutional Court (MK) that are out of sync with one another. This decision has the impact of legal dualism which results in confusion for the General Election Commission (KPU) to carry out its functions and even disharmony between legal norms. This normative research aims to determine the existence of a basis to support the DPD in order to reduce conflicts of interest. As a result, the KPU, when viewed from the normative aspect, the Constitutional Court is the sole interpreter of the constitution because of the authority granted by the constitution in Article 24 C. If so, then the KPU does not have to worry about implementing the Constitutional Court's decision because it is constitutional. That is, the KPU carrying out the Constitutional Court's Decision means maintaining the dignity of the DPR so that the aspirations carried out truly represent the needs of the region without worrying about conflicts of interest because they have as administrators of political parties.
{"title":"PEMAKNAAN NORMA KONSTITUSI DALAM PENGUATAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH DALAM RULE MAKING FUNCTION","authors":"A. Kartika","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.9","url":null,"abstract":"The existence of the House of Representatives (DPD) in including regional inputs in the form of norms has experienced polemics. These polemics include the decisions of the State Administrative Court (PTUN), the Supreme Court (MA), and the Constitutional Court (MK) that are out of sync with one another. This decision has the impact of legal dualism which results in confusion for the General Election Commission (KPU) to carry out its functions and even disharmony between legal norms. This normative research aims to determine the existence of a basis to support the DPD in order to reduce conflicts of interest. As a result, the KPU, when viewed from the normative aspect, the Constitutional Court is the sole interpreter of the constitution because of the authority granted by the constitution in Article 24 C. If so, then the KPU does not have to worry about implementing the Constitutional Court's decision because it is constitutional. That is, the KPU carrying out the Constitutional Court's Decision means maintaining the dignity of the DPR so that the aspirations carried out truly represent the needs of the region without worrying about conflicts of interest because they have as administrators of political parties.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46003677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.7
Sapto Hermawan, H. Herman
As an affected COVID-19 pandemic country, Indonesia took policy options through Social Restrictions on Large-Scale (PSBB), supported by six legal documents from Government Regulation in Lieu-of-The Law, Government Regulations, to Presidential Decrees. This socio-legal research aims to analyze the COVID-19 countermeasure policy through Roscoe Pound's sociological jurisprudence. Base on empirical data from March to December 2020, the results showed that the policy to overcome COVID-19 is supported by six legal documents when examined through analysis of the hierarchy of norms, clarity of the purpose and usefulness very contradictory to the purpose of the deployment restrictions of COVID-19 itself. Referring to sociological jurisprudence, the COVID-19 policies should be based on four essential elements adjusted to public requirements so that the implementation of the policies can perform effectively.
{"title":"ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENANGANAN COVID-19 DARI PERSPEKTIF SOCIOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE","authors":"Sapto Hermawan, H. Herman","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.7","url":null,"abstract":"As an affected COVID-19 pandemic country, Indonesia took policy options through Social Restrictions on Large-Scale (PSBB), supported by six legal documents from Government Regulation in Lieu-of-The Law, Government Regulations, to Presidential Decrees. This socio-legal research aims to analyze the COVID-19 countermeasure policy through Roscoe Pound's sociological jurisprudence. Base on empirical data from March to December 2020, the results showed that the policy to overcome COVID-19 is supported by six legal documents when examined through analysis of the hierarchy of norms, clarity of the purpose and usefulness very contradictory to the purpose of the deployment restrictions of COVID-19 itself. Referring to sociological jurisprudence, the COVID-19 policies should be based on four essential elements adjusted to public requirements so that the implementation of the policies can perform effectively.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46298469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.1
Prawitra Thalib, Sri Hajati, Faizal Kurniawan, Komari Aldiansyah
Microfinance Institutions (hereinafter referred to as MFIs) are financial institutions that function as intermediary institutions that aim not only to seek profit, but have another goal, namely social goals whose activities are more community development. MFIs in conducting business activities can be carried out conventionally or based on Sharia Principles. The business activities carried out by MFIs include trading activities, namely in the service sector. In carrying out Shariah MFI business activities, it must be based on Sharia Principles. The method used in writing this article is normative research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the Sharia Principles in this context are guided by the basic principles of Muamalah. The important objective in this research is the regulation in the laws and regulations regarding this matter whether it is in accordance with sharia principles. Harmonization between legislation as positive law in Indonesia with sharia principles sourced from the Qur'an and Hadith as the main legal sources of Islamic law is absolutely necessary to ensure legal certainty.
{"title":"THE URGENCE REGULATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES ON ISLAMIC MICROFINANCE INSTITUTION ACCORDING LAW NO. 1 YEAR 2013 OF MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS","authors":"Prawitra Thalib, Sri Hajati, Faizal Kurniawan, Komari Aldiansyah","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.1","url":null,"abstract":"Microfinance Institutions (hereinafter referred to as MFIs) are financial institutions that function as intermediary institutions that aim not only to seek profit, but have another goal, namely social goals whose activities are more community development. MFIs in conducting business activities can be carried out conventionally or based on Sharia Principles. The business activities carried out by MFIs include trading activities, namely in the service sector. In carrying out Shariah MFI business activities, it must be based on Sharia Principles. The method used in writing this article is normative research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the Sharia Principles in this context are guided by the basic principles of Muamalah. The important objective in this research is the regulation in the laws and regulations regarding this matter whether it is in accordance with sharia principles. Harmonization between legislation as positive law in Indonesia with sharia principles sourced from the Qur'an and Hadith as the main legal sources of Islamic law is absolutely necessary to ensure legal certainty.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44047069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.8
Taufik Nugraha
It has been 50 years since the Non-Proliferation Treaty was made by America, England, and the Soviet Union to prevent the nuclear arms race in the future. However, Article VI of NPT consisted of ambiguity and has sparked long-lasting debate questioning NPT electiveness. Article VI at least has been examining twice by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1996 and 2014. Unfortunately, those examinations were unsatisfied regarding when Nuclear Weapon State (NWS) should cease and disarmament their nuclear weapon? If referring to “an early date,” it should be done years long ago and not taking more than 50 years with pathetic achievement. Finally, this article will examine the current development of NWS using a normative juridical method according to existing nuclear regulation, ICJ Commentary, which resulting in a suggestion when NPT 1968 parties should fulfil their obligation under Art VI NPT 1968.
{"title":"INTERPRETASI INTERNATIONAL COURT of JUSTICE (ICJ) PADA PASAL VI PERJANJIAN NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY 1968 (NPT)","authors":"Taufik Nugraha","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.8","url":null,"abstract":"It has been 50 years since the Non-Proliferation Treaty was made by America, England, and the Soviet Union to prevent the nuclear arms race in the future. However, Article VI of NPT consisted of ambiguity and has sparked long-lasting debate questioning NPT electiveness. Article VI at least has been examining twice by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1996 and 2014. Unfortunately, those examinations were unsatisfied regarding when Nuclear Weapon State (NWS) should cease and disarmament their nuclear weapon? If referring to “an early date,” it should be done years long ago and not taking more than 50 years with pathetic achievement. Finally, this article will examine the current development of NWS using a normative juridical method according to existing nuclear regulation, ICJ Commentary, which resulting in a suggestion when NPT 1968 parties should fulfil their obligation under Art VI NPT 1968.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41604909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.4
D. Jonaidi, A. Wibisana
In recent years, the Minister of Environment and Forestry (MoEF) has intensified the use of its rights to sue for environmental damage. In most of the lawsuits, the courts have ruled in favor of the MoEF. Surprisingly, hitherto no restoration has taken place in areas where the MoEF’s claims for damages have been granted. Based on conceptual and comparative approaches, this research addresses the restoration of environmental damage in the United States of America and Indonesia. This article finds some problems with the restoration of environmental damage in Indonesia, such as the absence of a Recovery Plan, the use of theoretical damage valuation methods, and the absence of full compensation measures. This article also proposes some recommendations to improve the implementation of the government’s right to sue in Indonesia.
{"title":"KONSEP GUGATAN PEMERINTAH ATAS PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN: KOMPARASI ANTARA INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT","authors":"D. Jonaidi, A. Wibisana","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.4","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the Minister of Environment and Forestry (MoEF) has intensified the use of its rights to sue for environmental damage. In most of the lawsuits, the courts have ruled in favor of the MoEF. Surprisingly, hitherto no restoration has taken place in areas where the MoEF’s claims for damages have been granted. Based on conceptual and comparative approaches, this research addresses the restoration of environmental damage in the United States of America and Indonesia. This article finds some problems with the restoration of environmental damage in Indonesia, such as the absence of a Recovery Plan, the use of theoretical damage valuation methods, and the absence of full compensation measures. This article also proposes some recommendations to improve the implementation of the government’s right to sue in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43050242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.10
Ali Trigiyatno
This paper aims to compare the provisions of fiqh with the legislation in terms of the husband being imprisoned as the reason for the wife to file for divorce in four Muslim countries. They are Indonesia as a representative of the country with the majority of the population following the Shafi'i school, Morocco representing the Maliki school, Jordan representing the Hanafi school, and Qatar representing the Hanbali school. Using a normative approach and a comparative method, this paper aims to look for aspects of similarities as well as differences from fiqh provisions compared to legislation in the four countries. The results shows that the legislation in the four countries basically takes the opinion of the Maliki and Hanbali schools which allow divorce because the husband is imprisoned. From the four countries, Indonesia has set the longest prison term, which is five years, while Morocco and Jordan are imprisoned for a minimum of three years and Qatar is two years. Indonesia and Jordan seem quite far from leaving the rules in the dominant fiqh school in their country by not following the school's fatwa adopted to prohibit divorce because the husband is imprisoned. Meanwhile, Morocco and Qatar are in accordance with the dominant schools of jurisprudence in their countries, with a few additions to more detailed and operational rules.
{"title":"SUAMI DIPENJARA SEBAGAI ALASAN CERAI GUGAT; PERSPEKTIF FIKIH DAN LEGISLASI NEGERI MUSLIM","authors":"Ali Trigiyatno","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.10","url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to compare the provisions of fiqh with the legislation in terms of the husband being imprisoned as the reason for the wife to file for divorce in four Muslim countries. They are Indonesia as a representative of the country with the majority of the population following the Shafi'i school, Morocco representing the Maliki school, Jordan representing the Hanafi school, and Qatar representing the Hanbali school. Using a normative approach and a comparative method, this paper aims to look for aspects of similarities as well as differences from fiqh provisions compared to legislation in the four countries. The results shows that the legislation in the four countries basically takes the opinion of the Maliki and Hanbali schools which allow divorce because the husband is imprisoned. From the four countries, Indonesia has set the longest prison term, which is five years, while Morocco and Jordan are imprisoned for a minimum of three years and Qatar is two years. Indonesia and Jordan seem quite far from leaving the rules in the dominant fiqh school in their country by not following the school's fatwa adopted to prohibit divorce because the husband is imprisoned. Meanwhile, Morocco and Qatar are in accordance with the dominant schools of jurisprudence in their countries, with a few additions to more detailed and operational rules.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43505839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.5
A. Merdekawati, Swissitya Ajari, Irkham Afnan Trisandi Hasibuan, I. Agung
The special status of Exclusive Economic Zone of Indonesia (EEZ) raises a problem particularly related to the submarine cable laying activities. This study aims to analyze the compatibility of the marine location permit instrument under Law No. 32/2014 on Marine Affairs and Government Regulation No. 32/2019 on National Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) with UNCLOS 1982 in regulating submarine cable in the EEZ. This normative research shows that the marine location permit instrument regulating submarine cable laying activity in EEZ is incompatible with the provisions of UNCLOS 1982. In contrast, the MSP instrument is compatible and a suitable instrument to protect Indonesia's interests in the EEZ. The Government of Indonesia is advised to regulate an exemption clause for submarine cable installation in EEZ in the Draft of Government Regulation on Marine Location Permit; formulate and formalize ‘prior notification’ procedures by other countries in submarine cable laying activities in EEZ into laws and regulations; and publish the Government Regulation on Marine Spatial Planning and its annexes through the channels of relevant international organizations such as International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC) and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC).
{"title":"COMPATIBILITY OF INDONESIA’S REGULATIONS ON SUBMARINE CABLE WITH UNCLOS 1982","authors":"A. Merdekawati, Swissitya Ajari, Irkham Afnan Trisandi Hasibuan, I. Agung","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.5","url":null,"abstract":"The special status of Exclusive Economic Zone of Indonesia (EEZ) raises a problem particularly related to the submarine cable laying activities. This study aims to analyze the compatibility of the marine location permit instrument under Law No. 32/2014 on Marine Affairs and Government Regulation No. 32/2019 on National Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) with UNCLOS 1982 in regulating submarine cable in the EEZ. This normative research shows that the marine location permit instrument regulating submarine cable laying activity in EEZ is incompatible with the provisions of UNCLOS 1982. In contrast, the MSP instrument is compatible and a suitable instrument to protect Indonesia's interests in the EEZ. The Government of Indonesia is advised to regulate an exemption clause for submarine cable installation in EEZ in the Draft of Government Regulation on Marine Location Permit; formulate and formalize ‘prior notification’ procedures by other countries in submarine cable laying activities in EEZ into laws and regulations; and publish the Government Regulation on Marine Spatial Planning and its annexes through the channels of relevant international organizations such as International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC) and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC).","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46064045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.3
Syahrul Sajidin
Countries in the world still do not have the same nature in compiling rules related to cryptocurrency, therfore it is very important to study the legality of using cryptocurrency as a means of payment in Indonesia. This paper aims to analyze the legal protection for the society related to the use of cryptocurrency as a payment. In particular cryptocurrency has two usability functions, namely as a medium of exchange and as a commodity. As a medium of exchange, cryptocurrency has currency characteristics because it can be accepted as a means of payment within a certain scope and its value is maintained because the number of issuance is limited. But the cryptocurrency is not a legitimate and official currency because it does not have the authority to issue and regulate, manage circulation and distribution, maintain its exchange value and all these functions are carried out by the computing system so that accountability is still doubtful.
{"title":"LEGALITAS PENGGUNAAN CRYPTOCURRENCY SEBAGAI ALAT PEMBAYARAN DI INDONESIA","authors":"Syahrul Sajidin","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.3","url":null,"abstract":"Countries in the world still do not have the same nature in compiling rules related to cryptocurrency, therfore it is very important to study the legality of using cryptocurrency as a means of payment in Indonesia. This paper aims to analyze the legal protection for the society related to the use of cryptocurrency as a payment. In particular cryptocurrency has two usability functions, namely as a medium of exchange and as a commodity. As a medium of exchange, cryptocurrency has currency characteristics because it can be accepted as a means of payment within a certain scope and its value is maintained because the number of issuance is limited. But the cryptocurrency is not a legitimate and official currency because it does not have the authority to issue and regulate, manage circulation and distribution, maintain its exchange value and all these functions are carried out by the computing system so that accountability is still doubtful.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44216762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-31DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.6
Setyo Widagdo, Rika Kurniaty
This article aims to discuss the Principles of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) that may be applied to the conflict in the Gaza Strip between Israel and Palestine. This normative legal research using a conceptual approach and a case approach indicates that the humanitarian crisis resulting from the conflict needs to be the focus of the international community, and the R2P principle may be applied as an alternative solution. Although the R2P principle is not a legal formulation, R2P plays an important role. It is recognized as an emerging norm or an obligation with a legal significance. R2P has been agreed upon and accepted by most countries globally that are members of the United Nations through UN General Assembly Resolutions. R2P assigns responsibility to the international community to help parties protect populations from the crime of genocide. Ultimately, R2P is expected to encourage states to fulfill their legal responsibilities and obligations, help build capacity to protect populations, and provide assistance to states in emergencies.
{"title":"PRINSIP RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT (R2P) DALAM KONFLIK ISRAEL- PALESTINA: BAGAIMANA SIKAP INDONESIA?","authors":"Setyo Widagdo, Rika Kurniaty","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.6","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to discuss the Principles of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) that may be applied to the conflict in the Gaza Strip between Israel and Palestine. This normative legal research using a conceptual approach and a case approach indicates that the humanitarian crisis resulting from the conflict needs to be the focus of the international community, and the R2P principle may be applied as an alternative solution. Although the R2P principle is not a legal formulation, R2P plays an important role. It is recognized as an emerging norm or an obligation with a legal significance. R2P has been agreed upon and accepted by most countries globally that are members of the United Nations through UN General Assembly Resolutions. R2P assigns responsibility to the international community to help parties protect populations from the crime of genocide. Ultimately, R2P is expected to encourage states to fulfill their legal responsibilities and obligations, help build capacity to protect populations, and provide assistance to states in emergencies.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44455688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：