Pub Date : 2017-12-22DOI: 10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47963
Amed Ramírez Sánchez, N. Pérez
espanolLa responsabilidad de la Administracion Publica y el contencioso administrativo constituyen dos garantias basicas que configuran el regimen administrativo en el Estado de derecho. La funcionalidad de ese binomio permite articular las pretensiones indemnizatorias de los ciudadanos ante el poder publico por las lesiones a sus derechos e intereses legitimos. En Cuba, el desarrollo de este binomio ha sido limitado no solo en el orden teorico, sino en su regulacion normativa y realizacion practica, restando eficiencia a su rol garantista en el diseno de derechos y garantias reconocido en el orden constitucional. Sobre esa base, la investigacion tiene como objetivo argumentar las limitaciones dogmaticas del acceso a la justicia administrativa en Cuba en procesos de responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administracion Publica, a efectos del perfeccionamiento de su regimen juridico. Para ello, la exposicion de ideas se distribuira en cinco ejes cardinales, partiendo del acceso a la justicia administrativa en Cuba para adentrarse en la configuracion de la legitimacion activa y pasiva para su exigencia, el objeto del contencioso de responsabilidad, para culminar las valoraciones sobre la relacion organo, jurisdiccion y competencia. La investigacion concluye por destacar la necesidad de una reforma de nuestra legislacion del contencioso que se pronuncie por un pleno acceso a su justiciabilidad sobre la base de las deficiencias determinadas, acompanada de la modificacion de los criterios interpretativos con que se maneja nuestra jurisprudencia administrativa, para el logro de la justiciabilidad de la responsabilidad de la Administracion Publica. EnglishThe responsibility of the Public Administration and Administrative Procedure constitute two basic guarantees that configure the administrative regime in the Rule of Law. The functionality of this binomial allows articulating the compensation claims of citizens before the public power for injuries to their rights and legitimate interests. In Cuba, the development of this binomial has been limited not only in the theoretical order, but also in its normative regulation and practical realization, reducing efficiency to its guarantor role in the design of rights and guarantees recognized in the constitutional order. On this basis, the research aims to argue the dogmatic limitations of access to administrative justice in Cuba in processes of patrimonial responsibility of the Public Administration, for the purpose of perfecting its legal regime. To do this, the exposition of ideas will be distributed in five cardinal axes, starting from the access to the administrative justice in Cuba to enter in the configuration of the active and passive legitimation for its demand, the object of the contentious of responsibility, to culminate the valuations on the relationship organ, jurisdiction and competition. The investigation concludes by emphasizing the need for a reform of our litigation legislation that is pronounced by
公共行政责任和行政诉讼是构成法治行政制度的两项基本保障。这一二项式的功能使公民能够就其合法权益受到的损害向公共当局提出赔偿要求。在古巴，这一二项式的发展不仅在理论上受到限制，而且在规范和实际执行方面也受到限制，使其在宪法秩序所承认的权利和保障的设计中发挥保障作用的效率降低。在此基础上，本研究旨在探讨古巴在公共行政世袭责任程序中获得行政司法的教条限制，以完善其法律制度。为此,想法exposicion distribuira五个轴的指南针,诉诸司法行政在古巴进入legitimacion主动和被动的配置要求的责任争议的客体,以完成排行榜能力,管辖权和竞争的关系。调查的结论是,为了我们强调改革legislacion争端,将充分利用法院审理的基础上某些缺陷、acompanada modificacion说明性标准地处理我们的行政判例可否审理,实现公共行政责任。《公共行政责任》和《行政程序》是在法治中确立行政制度的两项基本保障。这两项规定的功能允许在公共权力面前阐明公民因其权利和合法利益受到损害而提出的赔偿要求。在古巴，这一二项式制度的发展不仅在理论上受到限制，而且在规范规范和实际执行方面也受到限制，降低了它在宪法秩序所承认的权利和保障的设计中发挥保障作用的效力。在此基础上，本研究旨在论证在古巴，为了完善其法律制度，在涉及公共行政世袭责任的诉讼中，对行使行政司法的教条限制。To do this, the exposition of ideas将分布式in five基数裁减,starting from the access To the行政司法in古巴To enter the configuration of the active and passive legitimation for its需求,the object of the contentious of responsibility To culminate the valuations on the relationship organ,管辖与竞争。调查在文末by为着深刻变革reform of our诉讼立法that is pronounced by a full access to its justifiability根据的果决,陪同by The修改of The interpretive标准with which our administrative is《编辑部,成就《justifiability of The responsibility of The Public Administration。
{"title":"La exigencia de responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administración Pública en Cuba. Limitaciones en su acceso a la justicia administrativa","authors":"Amed Ramírez Sánchez, N. Pérez","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47963","url":null,"abstract":"espanolLa responsabilidad de la Administracion Publica y el contencioso administrativo constituyen dos garantias basicas que configuran el regimen administrativo en el Estado de derecho. La funcionalidad de ese binomio permite articular las pretensiones indemnizatorias de los ciudadanos ante el poder publico por las lesiones a sus derechos e intereses legitimos. En Cuba, el desarrollo de este binomio ha sido limitado no solo en el orden teorico, sino en su regulacion normativa y realizacion practica, restando eficiencia a su rol garantista en el diseno de derechos y garantias reconocido en el orden constitucional. Sobre esa base, la investigacion tiene como objetivo argumentar las limitaciones dogmaticas del acceso a la justicia administrativa en Cuba en procesos de responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administracion Publica, a efectos del perfeccionamiento de su regimen juridico. Para ello, la exposicion de ideas se distribuira en cinco ejes cardinales, partiendo del acceso a la justicia administrativa en Cuba para adentrarse en la configuracion de la legitimacion activa y pasiva para su exigencia, el objeto del contencioso de responsabilidad, para culminar las valoraciones sobre la relacion organo, jurisdiccion y competencia. La investigacion concluye por destacar la necesidad de una reforma de nuestra legislacion del contencioso que se pronuncie por un pleno acceso a su justiciabilidad sobre la base de las deficiencias determinadas, acompanada de la modificacion de los criterios interpretativos con que se maneja nuestra jurisprudencia administrativa, para el logro de la justiciabilidad de la responsabilidad de la Administracion Publica. EnglishThe responsibility of the Public Administration and Administrative Procedure constitute two basic guarantees that configure the administrative regime in the Rule of Law. The functionality of this binomial allows articulating the compensation claims of citizens before the public power for injuries to their rights and legitimate interests. In Cuba, the development of this binomial has been limited not only in the theoretical order, but also in its normative regulation and practical realization, reducing efficiency to its guarantor role in the design of rights and guarantees recognized in the constitutional order. On this basis, the research aims to argue the dogmatic limitations of access to administrative justice in Cuba in processes of patrimonial responsibility of the Public Administration, for the purpose of perfecting its legal regime. To do this, the exposition of ideas will be distributed in five cardinal axes, starting from the access to the administrative justice in Cuba to enter in the configuration of the active and passive legitimation for its demand, the object of the contentious of responsibility, to culminate the valuations on the relationship organ, jurisdiction and competition. The investigation concludes by emphasizing the need for a reform of our litigation legislation that is pronounced by","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"101-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48982562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-12-22DOI: 10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47965
J. Mañalich
En un caso que involucraba un episodio de violencia machista cuya crudeza no ha dejado indiferente a la opinion publica, la Corte Suprema decidio, acogiendo en tal medida el recurso de nulidad interpuesto por la defensa del condenado, revocar la condena por femicidio frustrado que, junto a otras dos condenas, una por violacion de domicilio y otra por lesion grave gravisima en los terminos del numeral 1 del articulo 397 del Codigo Penal, fuera pronunciada por el Tribunal de Juicio Oral en lo Penal de Coyhaique (el tribunal). Por decision de mayoria, y en contra del parecer manifestado por el ministro Juica en su voto disidente, la segunda Sala de la Corte declaro infundada la primera condena, sustituyendola —a traves de la correspondiente de reemplazo— por una condena por lesion corporal simplemente grave en los terminos del numeral 2 del articulo 397 del Codigo Penal, quedando esta anadida, entonces, a las dos condenas que no fueron objeto de anulacion.
{"title":"¿Incompatibilidad entre frustración y dolo eventual? Comentario a la sentencia de la Corte Suprema en causa rol 19.008-17","authors":"J. Mañalich","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47965","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47965","url":null,"abstract":"En un caso que involucraba un episodio de violencia machista cuya crudeza no ha dejado indiferente a la opinion publica, la Corte Suprema decidio, acogiendo en tal medida el recurso de nulidad interpuesto por la defensa del condenado, revocar la condena por femicidio frustrado que, junto a otras dos condenas, una por violacion de domicilio y otra por lesion grave gravisima en los terminos del numeral 1 del articulo 397 del Codigo Penal, fuera pronunciada por el Tribunal de Juicio Oral en lo Penal de Coyhaique (el tribunal). Por decision de mayoria, y en contra del parecer manifestado por el ministro Juica en su voto disidente, la segunda Sala de la Corte declaro infundada la primera condena, sustituyendola —a traves de la correspondiente de reemplazo— por una condena por lesion corporal simplemente grave en los terminos del numeral 2 del articulo 397 del Codigo Penal, quedando esta anadida, entonces, a las dos condenas que no fueron objeto de anulacion.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"171-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47848569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-12-22DOI: 10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47960
Francisco Bassi Díaz
El articulo tiene por objeto proponer una revision critica de la estructura dogmatica que se le ha atribuido a la culpa infraccional como factor especial de atribucion de responsabilidad civil extracontractual, mediante un examen de la plausibilidad de las razones esgrimidas en la doctrina nacional para sostener que su efecto juridico paradigmatico derivaria en presunciones de responsabilidad o de culpabilidad.
{"title":"Culpa infraccional. Elementos para una perspectiva crítica sobre sus efectos jurídicos en el derecho civil chileno","authors":"Francisco Bassi Díaz","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47960","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47960","url":null,"abstract":"El articulo tiene por objeto proponer una revision critica de la estructura dogmatica que se le ha atribuido a la culpa infraccional como factor especial de atribucion de responsabilidad civil extracontractual, mediante un examen de la plausibilidad de las razones esgrimidas en la doctrina nacional para sostener que su efecto juridico paradigmatico derivaria en presunciones de responsabilidad o de culpabilidad.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"37-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44110428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-12-22DOI: 10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47964
José Luis Guzmán Dalbora
espanolLa economia chilena sufrio una verdadera debacle, un desastre de enormes consecuencias sociales en 1981-1982. El articulo describe sus causas, dinamismo y efectos. Explica que todo ello era previsible para el gobierno militar y sus economistas civiles hacia 1981; que las causas de la crisis fueron introducidas deliberadamente por las autoridades publicas; que se dejo crecer la crisis hasta el nivel que alcanzo con la finalidad de asegurar el sistema economico de feroz neoliberalismo instaurando a partir de 1974; y que la falta en la legislacion de delitos apropiados para castigar las conductas criminales que ocurrieron antes y durante la crisis, no fue ni es todavia en absoluto una casualidad. EnglishThe Chilean economy experienced a real debacle, a disaster with enormous social consequences in 1981-1982. The article describes its causes, dynamism and effects. It explains that all this was foreseeable for the military government and its civilian econ- omists by 1981; that the causes of the crisis were deliberately introduced by the public authorities; that the crisis was allowed to grow to the level that it reached in order to en- sure the economic system of fierce neoliberalism, which began in 1974, and that the lack in the legislation of appropriate crimes to punish the criminal behaviors that occurred before and during the crisis, was not and still is not at all a coincidence.
{"title":"Perfiles penales de la debacle de la economía chilena en 1982-1983","authors":"José Luis Guzmán Dalbora","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.47964","url":null,"abstract":"espanolLa economia chilena sufrio una verdadera debacle, un desastre de enormes consecuencias sociales en 1981-1982. El articulo describe sus causas, dinamismo y efectos. Explica que todo ello era previsible para el gobierno militar y sus economistas civiles hacia 1981; que las causas de la crisis fueron introducidas deliberadamente por las autoridades publicas; que se dejo crecer la crisis hasta el nivel que alcanzo con la finalidad de asegurar el sistema economico de feroz neoliberalismo instaurando a partir de 1974; y que la falta en la legislacion de delitos apropiados para castigar las conductas criminales que ocurrieron antes y durante la crisis, no fue ni es todavia en absoluto una casualidad. EnglishThe Chilean economy experienced a real debacle, a disaster with enormous social consequences in 1981-1982. The article describes its causes, dynamism and effects. It explains that all this was foreseeable for the military government and its civilian econ- omists by 1981; that the causes of the crisis were deliberately introduced by the public authorities; that the crisis was allowed to grow to the level that it reached in order to en- sure the economic system of fierce neoliberalism, which began in 1974, and that the lack in the legislation of appropriate crimes to punish the criminal behaviors that occurred before and during the crisis, was not and still is not at all a coincidence.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"143-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44754409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-07-05DOI: 10.5354/0718-4735.2017.46487
Jean Pierre Matus Acuña
The article critically describes and analyzes the different forms of preventive detention in the Alfredo Etcheberry’s Draft Penal Code for Chile, considering the existing constitutional limitations. It is concluded that only preventive detention for persons prone to crime would be constitutionally legitimate, since it has a purpose in accordance with international treaties (social reintegration) and a foundation compatible with constitutional order (the proven danger of the agent’s reiteration). In addition, it has a post-criminal nature, offers voluntary programs of social reintegration, has a maximum limited duration and would be subject to periodic review by the courts. The rest of the proposed measures, however, do not appear to be legitimate, in the light of constitutional limitations.
{"title":"Las medidas de seguridad para personas naturales imputables en el proyecto de Código Penal para Chile de Alfredo Etcheberry","authors":"Jean Pierre Matus Acuña","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.46487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.46487","url":null,"abstract":"The article critically describes and analyzes the different forms of preventive detention in the Alfredo Etcheberry’s Draft Penal Code for Chile, considering the existing constitutional limitations. It is concluded that only preventive detention for persons prone to crime would be constitutionally legitimate, since it has a purpose in accordance with international treaties (social reintegration) and a foundation compatible with constitutional order (the proven danger of the agent’s reiteration). In addition, it has a post-criminal nature, offers voluntary programs of social reintegration, has a \u0000maximum limited duration and would be subject to periodic review by the courts. The rest of the proposed measures, however, do not appear to be legitimate, in the light of \u0000constitutional limitations.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"253-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46027736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The justifying «aggressive state of emergency» (section 34 of the German Criminal Code/StGB) is a challenge to liberal criminal legal Systems, as it imposes a legal obligation to tolerate an intrusion into his own legal sphere onto an innocent bystander. This obligation is traditionally based on the notion of «weighing of interests», which is, however, not convincing due to the utilitaristic structure of this idea. More recently, the topos of «solidarity» has replaced the traditional approach as a basis of legitimation, but this topos is not more than a mere catchphrase, as long as it lacks a reasonable justification. To close this justification gap, it is widespread to use prudential considerations. Accordingly, it is prudent for every citizen to agree on a rule along the lines of section 34 StGB with his fellow citizens, for the sake of minimizing his own risks of life. But this approach cannot convincingly answer the question regarding the reason for the obligation imposed by the «state of emergency» rules. Additionally, it falsifies the quality of legal wrong that a citizen commits by breaching his obligation during the state of emergency. Therefore, this essay suggests to see the «offender» who is justified by a state of emergency as representative of the State’s caring society (staatliche Solidargemeinschaft). The right to solidarity, that can be claimed by any citizen in a state of emergency, is directed against his fellow citizens as a whole, just as in all other cases of need through no fault of one’s own. The precise individual person the duty is actually imposed onto is merely a «transit station». Therefore, only such duties may be imposed onto him that can be compensated afterwards, and the community must also ensure that such compensation actually takes place.
{"title":"Solidaridad como categoría de legitimación jurídicopenal: El ejemplo del estado de necesidad agresivo justificante","authors":"Michael Pawlik","doi":"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46485","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46485","url":null,"abstract":"The justifying «aggressive state of emergency» (section 34 of the German Criminal Code/StGB) is a challenge to liberal criminal legal Systems, as it imposes a legal obligation to tolerate an intrusion into his own legal sphere onto an innocent bystander. This obligation is traditionally based on the notion of «weighing of interests», which is, however, not convincing due to the utilitaristic structure of this idea. More recently, the topos of «solidarity» has replaced the traditional approach as a basis of legitimation, but this topos is not more than a mere catchphrase, as long as it lacks a \u0000reasonable justification. To close this justification gap, it is widespread to use prudential considerations. Accordingly, it is prudent for every citizen to agree on a rule along the lines of section 34 StGB with his fellow citizens, for the sake of minimizing his own risks of life. But this approach cannot convincingly answer the question regarding the reason for the obligation imposed by the «state of emergency» rules. Additionally, it falsifies the quality of legal wrong that a citizen commits by breaching his obligation during the state of emergency. Therefore, this essay suggests to see the «offender» who is justified by a state of emergency as representative of the State’s caring society (staatliche Solidargemeinschaft). \u0000The right to solidarity, that can be claimed by any citizen in a state of \u0000emergency, is directed against his fellow citizens as a whole, just as in all other cases of \u0000need through no fault of one’s own. The precise individual \u0000person the duty is actually \u0000imposed onto is merely a «transit station». Therefore, only such duties may be imposed \u0000onto him that can be compensated afterwards, and the community \u0000must also ensure that \u0000such compensation actually takes place.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"222-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42100732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article aims to make a succinct study of the crime of terrorism financing in Chile, reviewing the legislation affecting both natural persons (Article 8 of Law 18.314) and legal entities (Law 20.393). In addition, we do a study of the historical-legislative context in which the crime was introduced, together with an analysis of the phenomenon of the terrorism financing in the world. Then a dogmatic analysis of the criminal figure in Chile is carried out, making some critical observations in his case, on some specific points of the legislation about of the crime of terrorism financing.
{"title":"El delito de financiamiento del terrorismo en la legislación chilena","authors":"Edison Carrasco Jiménez","doi":"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46483","url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to make a succinct study of the crime of terrorism financing in Chile, reviewing the legislation affecting both natural persons (Article 8 of Law 18.314) and legal entities (Law 20.393). In addition, we do a study of the historical-legislative context in which the crime was introduced, together with an analysis of the phenomenon of the terrorism financing in the world. Then a dogmatic analysis of the criminal figure in Chile is carried out, making some critical observations in his case, on some specific points of the legislation about of the crime of terrorism financing.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"145-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42313469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The author suggests that we understand the problem of the principles in Prof. Em. Etcheberry’s Penal Code Project, as an issue about the origins or the beginnings of codification, rather than as an exploration of the values that underlie the specific rules contained in the project. This going back to origins should not be understood in conservative ways as a regression, but rather as a logical return to the conditions that allow us to understand criminal law as a practice that can inhabit the world of the law.
{"title":"Hacia un nuevo Código Penal para Chile. Consideraciones sobre los principios en el anteproyecto de Alfredo Etcheberry","authors":"Rocío Lorca Ferreccio","doi":"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46486","url":null,"abstract":"The author suggests that we understand the problem of the principles in Prof. Em. Etcheberry’s Penal Code Project, as an issue about the origins or the beginnings of codification, rather than as an exploration of the values that underlie the specific rules contained in the project. This going back to origins should not be understood in conservative ways as a regression, but rather as a logical return to the conditions that allow us to understand criminal law as a practice that can inhabit the world of the law.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"248-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42104645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper provides a brief description of the state of affairs on the issue of implementation of fundamental rights of the citizens in administrative penalty procedures, based on some statements of the Chilean courts of justice. Here it is propose uprightly to abandon the search for a «supposed natural or ontological identity» between administrative offense and criminal offense. Under these assumptions, we conclude that a rational understanding of the tools that the administration has, to determine their duties, can finally help as a clarification of the historical relationship between administrative penalty and punishment.
{"title":"Una interpretación alternativa a la justificación de garantías penales en el derecho administrativo sancionador para Chile","authors":"P. Salgado","doi":"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46482","url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a brief description of the state of affairs on the issue of implementation of fundamental rights of the citizens in administrative penalty procedures, based on some statements of the Chilean courts of justice. Here it is propose uprightly to abandon the search for a «supposed natural or ontological identity» between administrative offense and criminal offense. Under these assumptions, we conclude that a rational understanding of the tools that the administration has, to determine their duties, can finally help as a clarification of the historical relationship between administrative \u0000penalty and punishment.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"96-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48914653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-06-30DOI: 10.5354/0718-4735.2017.46478
Félix Arias Schreiber Barba, Iván Ortiz Sánchez, Antonio Peña Jumpa
This paper gives the results of the research conducted at the Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru (PUCP) entitled «The language of the judges and the right of access to justice for persons in vulnerable situations. Pilot project». This research project aimed to explore the current state of judicial language written in family court proceedings and alternatives to improve their understanding. According to our hypothesis , the clarity of judgments in family proceedings involving people in a vulnerable situation, depends not only on the texts are drafted with syntactically and orthographically correct language, but other factors relating to the situation specific language of the target group of judicial decisions. The fieldwork of the research project was conducted in the Southern Judicial District of Lima. In this judicial district we conducted interviews with a group of judges and organized a workshop and reading comprehension test of judgments with a group of women belonging to a social organization. The results show a part that judges interviewed have severe difficulties to write clearly judgments that are directed to the citizens of vulnerable populations. Furthermore, it was found that test participants understanding of court rulings women do not understand the technical language of judgments and there is ample scope for simplifying and improving the texts. The research results have been organized into three sections. In the first one we present the theoretical framework of the research: the relationship between law and language, the concept of judicial language and the constitutional status of the right to language comprehension of judges. In the second section the place, purpose, method, results and conclusions of the fieldwork is exposed. Finally, in the third section, the main trends that show international experiences to address the situation.
{"title":"El lenguaje de los jueces en el Distrito Judicial de Lima Sur: Una investigación exploratoria sobre el lenguaje en procesos judiciales de familia","authors":"Félix Arias Schreiber Barba, Iván Ortiz Sánchez, Antonio Peña Jumpa","doi":"10.5354/0718-4735.2017.46478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-4735.2017.46478","url":null,"abstract":"This paper gives the results of the research conducted at the Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru (PUCP) entitled «The language of the judges and the right of \u0000access to justice for persons in vulnerable situations. Pilot project». This research project aimed to explore the current state of judicial language written in family court proceedings and alternatives to improve their understanding. According to our hypothesis , the clarity of judgments in family proceedings involving people in a vulnerable situation, depends not only on the texts are drafted with syntactically and orthographically correct language, but other factors relating to the situation specific language of the target group of judicial decisions. The fieldwork of the research project was conducted in the Southern Judicial District of Lima. In this judicial district we conducted interviews with \u0000a group of judges and organized a workshop and reading comprehension test of judgments with a group of women belonging to a social organization. The results show a \u0000part that judges interviewed have severe difficulties to write clearly judgments that are directed to the citizens of vulnerable populations. Furthermore, it was found that test participants understanding of court rulings women do not understand the technical language of judgments and there is ample scope for simplifying and improving the texts. \u0000The research results have been organized into three sections. In the first one we present the theoretical framework of the research: the relationship between law and language, the concept of judicial language and the constitutional status of the right to language comprehension of judges. In the second section the place, purpose, method, results and conclusions of the fieldwork is exposed. Finally, in the third section, the main trends that show international experiences to address the situation.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41928516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：