首页 > 最新文献

Food Policy最新文献

英文 中文
Mitigating food security impacts from crisis in high-income countries: lessons from different contexts 减轻高收入国家危机对粮食安全的影响:来自不同背景的教训
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102956
Katherine Baldwin , Kristina Mensah , Laura Tiehen , Bettina Rudloff
Recent global events, including COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war, have brought to light vulnerabilities in global food supply chains. As a result, domestic food security in crisis situations is increasingly a topic of concern even in high-income countries. However, to date, there is limited literature to inform crisis response policy for food security in high-income countries. At the same time, related strands of literature from other crisis and country contexts offer relevant policy conclusions to inform the evidence base and identify areas for future research. This article expands the scope of analysis to review five related bodies of work, with the major aim of identifying findings relevant for food security policy in high-income countries in crises. First, we consider analysis related to food security policy in general crises contexts from the 1) disaster risk management in food and agriculture and 2) food and agricultural supply chain resilience literatures. Then, we turn to country context-specific findings, reviewing 3) food security policy in crisis situations in low- and middle-income countries, 4) food security policy outside of crisis in high-income countries, and finishing with the major focus of our review on nascent literature related to 5) food security policy in crisis situations in high-income countries. The review concludes by highlighting common themes relevant to food security policy and identifying research gaps to be addressed by future work.
最近的全球事件,包括COVID-19和俄罗斯-乌克兰战争,暴露了全球粮食供应链的脆弱性。因此,即使在高收入国家,危机局势下的国内粮食安全也日益成为人们关注的话题。然而,迄今为止,为高收入国家粮食安全危机应对政策提供信息的文献有限。与此同时,来自其他危机和国家背景的相关文献提供了相关的政策结论,为证据基础提供信息,并确定未来研究的领域。本文扩大了分析范围,审查了五个相关的工作机构,其主要目的是确定与危机中高收入国家粮食安全政策相关的研究结果。首先,我们从1)粮食和农业灾害风险管理和2)粮食和农业供应链弹性文献中考虑与一般危机背景下的粮食安全政策相关的分析。然后,我们转向国家具体情况的研究结果,回顾3)低收入和中等收入国家危机情况下的粮食安全政策,4)高收入国家危机情况下的粮食安全政策,最后重点回顾与5)高收入国家危机情况下的粮食安全政策相关的新兴文献。报告最后强调了与粮食安全政策相关的共同主题,并确定了未来工作需要解决的研究差距。
{"title":"Mitigating food security impacts from crisis in high-income countries: lessons from different contexts","authors":"Katherine Baldwin ,&nbsp;Kristina Mensah ,&nbsp;Laura Tiehen ,&nbsp;Bettina Rudloff","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102956","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102956","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent global events, including COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war, have brought to light vulnerabilities in global food supply chains. As a result, domestic food security in crisis situations is increasingly a topic of concern even in high-income countries. However, to date, there is limited literature to inform crisis response policy for food security in high-income countries. At the same time, related strands of literature from other crisis and country contexts offer relevant policy conclusions to inform the evidence base and identify areas for future research. This article expands the scope of analysis to review five related bodies of work, with the major aim of identifying findings relevant for food security policy in high-income countries in crises. First, we consider analysis related to food security policy in general crises contexts from the 1) disaster risk management in food and agriculture and 2) food and agricultural supply chain resilience literatures. Then, we turn to country context-specific findings, reviewing 3) food security policy in crisis situations in low- and middle-income countries, 4) food security policy outside of crisis in high-income countries, and finishing with the major focus of our review on nascent literature related to 5) food security policy in crisis situations in high-income countries. The review concludes by highlighting common themes relevant to food security policy and identifying research gaps to be addressed by future work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 102956"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145412431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review on the impact of Artificial Intelligence in the agri-food supply chain 人工智能对农业食品供应链影响的系统综述
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102983
Matilde Reitano , Michelle S. Segovia , Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr.
With a growing global population and escalating concerns over food security, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology capable of optimizing agricultural processes and improving resource efficiency and security. This systematic review explores the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in the whole agri-food supply chain, focusing on its implications for agricultural productivity and consumer behavior. Using the PRISMA guideline, a total of 64 articles were selected to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on artificial intelligence applications within this domain. Unlike previous reviews, this study leverages cluster analysis to categorize research findings into four main themes: 1) adoption of AI technologies in agriculture, 2) applications of AI in the intermediary management of the supply chain, 3) consumer perceptions and acceptance of AI-powered food innovations, and 4) the role of AI in precision nutrition and personalized health management. The review identifies key benefits of AI, including enhanced decision-making capabilities, improved supply chain transparency, and the facilitation of personalized nutrition strategies. It also highlights significant challenges such as technological accessibility, knowledge gaps among agricultural stakeholders, consumer skepticism, and notable methodological limitations in the existing research. The insights presented in this review contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the AI’s role in shaping the future of the agri-food supply chain and provide a foundation for policymakers, researchers, and industry stakeholders to develop strategies that maximize the societal and economic benefits of AI integration in the agri-food supply chain.
随着全球人口的增长和对粮食安全的担忧不断加剧,人工智能(AI)已经成为一种能够优化农业流程、提高资源效率和安全性的变革性技术。本系统综述探讨了人工智能在整个农业食品供应链中的变革潜力,重点关注其对农业生产力和消费者行为的影响。使用PRISMA指南,总共选择了64篇文章来全面概述该领域内人工智能应用的研究现状。与以往的研究不同,本研究利用聚类分析将研究成果分为四个主题:1)人工智能技术在农业中的应用,2)人工智能在供应链中介管理中的应用,3)消费者对人工智能驱动的食品创新的认知和接受程度,以及4)人工智能在精准营养和个性化健康管理中的作用。该评估确定了人工智能的主要好处,包括增强决策能力、提高供应链透明度和促进个性化营养战略。它还强调了重大挑战,如技术可及性、农业利益相关者之间的知识差距、消费者的怀疑态度以及现有研究中明显的方法局限性。本综述中提出的见解有助于更全面地了解人工智能在塑造农业食品供应链未来方面的作用,并为政策制定者、研究人员和行业利益相关者制定战略提供基础,以最大限度地提高人工智能在农业食品供应链中的社会和经济效益。
{"title":"A systematic review on the impact of Artificial Intelligence in the agri-food supply chain","authors":"Matilde Reitano ,&nbsp;Michelle S. Segovia ,&nbsp;Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr.","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102983","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102983","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With a growing global population and escalating concerns over food security, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology capable of optimizing agricultural processes and improving resource efficiency and security. This systematic review explores the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in the whole agri-food supply chain, focusing on its implications for agricultural productivity and consumer behavior. Using the PRISMA guideline, a total of 64 articles were selected to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on artificial intelligence applications within this domain. Unlike previous reviews, this study leverages cluster analysis to categorize research findings into four main themes: 1) adoption of AI technologies in agriculture, 2) applications of AI in the intermediary management of the supply chain, 3) consumer perceptions and acceptance of AI-powered food innovations, and 4) the role of AI in precision nutrition and personalized health management. The review identifies key benefits of AI, including enhanced decision-making capabilities, improved supply chain transparency, and the facilitation of personalized nutrition strategies. It also highlights significant challenges such as technological accessibility, knowledge gaps among agricultural stakeholders, consumer skepticism, and notable methodological limitations in the existing research. The insights presented in this review contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the AI’s role in shaping the future of the agri-food supply chain and provide a foundation for policymakers, researchers, and industry stakeholders to develop strategies that maximize the societal and economic benefits of AI integration in the agri-food supply chain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 102983"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145412429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of genotyping in measuring improved variety adoption and impact: advances, challenges, and policy directions 基因分型在衡量改良品种采用和影响中的作用:进展、挑战和政策方向
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102984
Mequanint B. Melesse , Mywish K. Maredia , Tesfamicheal Wossen , Damaris Odeny , David J. Spielman , Hope Michelson , Showkat Ahmad Waza , Kelvin Kamunye , Arega Alene , Manzoor H. Dar , Victor Afari-Sefa , Prabhu Pingali
Accurate measurement of agricultural technology adoption is critical for evaluating the effectiveness of investments in agricultural research and development. While household surveys have long served as the primary tool for tracking varietal adoption, growing evidence reveals systematic mismatches between self-reported and DNA verified varietal identity. These mismatches arise from distinct local and scientific varietal nomenclatures, complex seed systems, and high varietal release rates. This review examines the emerging role of genotyping, particularly DNA fingerprinting, as a complementary method for varietal identification and adoption measurement. Drawing on a growing body of studies across crops and geographies, we assess how DNA fingerprinting alters adoption estimates, reveals patterns of varietal misclassification, and enhances our understanding of seed system performance. We identify critical design considerations for implementing DNA fingerprinting at scale, including sampling strategies, reference library construction, and integration with standard household surveys. The review also highlights methodological innovations to reduce DNA fingerprinting costs and explores how fingerprinting can inform monitoring, evaluation, and scaling of agricultural innovations. Finally, we outline key research and policy priorities to mainstream DNA fingerprinting into national agricultural systems and to support more evidence-based, accountable, and equitable food policy.
准确衡量农业技术采用情况对于评估农业研发投资的有效性至关重要。虽然家庭调查长期以来一直是追踪品种采用情况的主要工具,但越来越多的证据表明,自我报告的品种身份与DNA验证的品种身份之间存在系统性的不匹配。这些不匹配是由不同的地方和科学的品种命名、复杂的种子系统和高品种释放率引起的。这篇综述探讨了基因分型,特别是DNA指纹,作为品种鉴定和采用率测量的补充方法的新作用。利用越来越多的跨作物和地域的研究,我们评估了DNA指纹如何改变采用率估计,揭示了品种错误分类的模式,并增强了我们对种子系统性能的理解。我们确定了大规模实施DNA指纹识别的关键设计考虑因素,包括采样策略、参考图书馆建设以及与标准家庭调查的整合。该综述还强调了降低DNA指纹识别成本的方法创新,并探讨了指纹识别如何为农业创新的监测、评估和规模化提供信息。最后,我们概述了将DNA指纹技术纳入国家农业系统主流的关键研究和政策重点,并支持更以证据为基础、更负责任和更公平的粮食政策。
{"title":"The role of genotyping in measuring improved variety adoption and impact: advances, challenges, and policy directions","authors":"Mequanint B. Melesse ,&nbsp;Mywish K. Maredia ,&nbsp;Tesfamicheal Wossen ,&nbsp;Damaris Odeny ,&nbsp;David J. Spielman ,&nbsp;Hope Michelson ,&nbsp;Showkat Ahmad Waza ,&nbsp;Kelvin Kamunye ,&nbsp;Arega Alene ,&nbsp;Manzoor H. Dar ,&nbsp;Victor Afari-Sefa ,&nbsp;Prabhu Pingali","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102984","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102984","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate measurement of agricultural technology adoption is critical for evaluating the effectiveness of investments in agricultural research and development. While household surveys have long served as the primary tool for tracking varietal adoption, growing evidence reveals systematic mismatches between self-reported and DNA verified varietal identity. These mismatches arise from distinct local and scientific varietal nomenclatures, complex seed systems, and high varietal release rates. This review examines the emerging role of genotyping, particularly DNA fingerprinting, as a complementary method for varietal identification and adoption measurement. Drawing on a growing body of studies across crops and geographies, we assess how DNA fingerprinting alters adoption estimates, reveals patterns of varietal misclassification, and enhances our understanding of seed system performance. We identify critical design considerations for implementing DNA fingerprinting at scale, including sampling strategies, reference library construction, and integration with standard household surveys. The review also highlights methodological innovations to reduce DNA fingerprinting costs and explores how fingerprinting can inform monitoring, evaluation, and scaling of agricultural innovations. Finally, we outline key research and policy priorities to mainstream DNA fingerprinting into national agricultural systems and to support more evidence-based, accountable, and equitable food policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 102984"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145412430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Food Policy Outstanding Reviewer Appreciation 食品政策杰出审稿人感谢
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0306-9192(25)00226-X
{"title":"Food Policy Outstanding Reviewer Appreciation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0306-9192(25)00226-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0306-9192(25)00226-X","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103021"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145786853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A scoping review of (dis-)incentives for animal welfare-improving farming practices 对改善动物福利的农业实践的(非)激励的范围审查
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102977
Trevor Woolley , Sharon Pailler , Jonathan McFadden , Zach Raff , Sharon Raszap Skorbiansky , Kevin Kuruc
Public interest in improving farm animal welfare has increased in recent years, but research on implementation of on-farm enhanced welfare practices lags behind. This review examines the incentives and barriers to adoption of animal welfare-improving farming practices from the perspective of key stakeholders: farmers and other animal product producers. We perform a machine-learning aided scoping review of the academic literature studying how different rearing practices influence economic outcomes for producers, providing direct evidence on the (dis-)incentives of adopting the practices studied. This allows us to (1) identify existing consensus and (2) highlight research gaps on the economic factors related to adoption of (or lack of) welfare-improved practices. Operating costs emerge as a near-universal disincentive for welfare-improving practices. Conversely, improved indoor environment shows potential benefits for animal health and productivity, suggesting the possibility of interventions that have only negligible impacts on overall profits. These takeaways are drawn from a relatively sparse literature, underscoring important research gaps. Addressing these gaps can inform evidence-based policies that align practice with public expectations for farm animal welfare while being cognizant of producer constraints and incentives.
近年来,公众对改善农场动物福利的兴趣有所增加,但对农场强化福利实践实施的研究却滞后。本综述从关键利益相关者(农民和其他动物产品生产者)的角度考察了采用改善动物福利的农业实践的动机和障碍。我们对学术文献进行了机器学习辅助的范围审查,研究不同的饲养方法如何影响生产者的经济结果,为采用所研究的方法的(非)激励提供了直接证据。这使我们能够(1)确定现有的共识,(2)突出与采用(或缺乏)福利改善实践相关的经济因素的研究差距。运营成本几乎普遍成为福利改善实践的抑制因素。相反,室内环境的改善显示出对动物健康和生产力的潜在好处,这表明干预措施可能对总体利润的影响微不足道。这些结论是从相对稀少的文献中得出的,强调了重要的研究空白。解决这些差距可以为基于证据的政策提供信息,使实践与公众对农场动物福利的期望保持一致,同时认识到生产者的约束和激励。
{"title":"A scoping review of (dis-)incentives for animal welfare-improving farming practices","authors":"Trevor Woolley ,&nbsp;Sharon Pailler ,&nbsp;Jonathan McFadden ,&nbsp;Zach Raff ,&nbsp;Sharon Raszap Skorbiansky ,&nbsp;Kevin Kuruc","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102977","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102977","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public interest in improving farm animal welfare has increased in recent years, but research on implementation of on-farm enhanced welfare practices lags behind. This review examines the incentives and barriers to adoption of animal welfare-improving farming practices from the perspective of key stakeholders: farmers and other animal product producers. We perform a machine-learning aided scoping review of the academic literature studying how different rearing practices influence economic outcomes for producers, providing direct evidence on the (dis-)incentives of adopting the practices studied. This allows us to (1) identify existing consensus and (2) highlight research gaps on the economic factors related to adoption of (or lack of) welfare-improved practices. Operating costs emerge as a near-universal disincentive for welfare-improving practices. Conversely, improved indoor environment shows potential benefits for animal health and productivity, suggesting the possibility of interventions that have only negligible impacts on overall profits. These takeaways are drawn from a relatively sparse literature, underscoring important research gaps. Addressing these gaps can inform evidence-based policies that align practice with public expectations for farm animal welfare while being cognizant of producer constraints and incentives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 102977"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145614296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agricultural innovation frames, policies, and instruments: evolution, lessons, and future research 农业创新框架、政策和工具:演变、教训和未来研究
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.103008
Catherine Ragasa , David Spielman , John Lynam
Scientific and technical innovation offers solutions to many pressing development problems in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in the agriculture sector. However, successful innovation is almost always contingent on an enabling policy environment. This paper reviews the evolution of research on the interaction between agricultural innovation and public policy. It is organized around a sequence of three distinct conceptual frameworks and policy narratives that have shaped this body of research over the past 60 years: the science and technology policy frame, the innovation system policy frame, and the transformative innovation policy and scaling frame. Drawing on seminal studies—both conceptual and empirical—from each frame, we examine their aims and objectives, the policy issues they sought to address, and the methods of analysis used. We then identify and discuss five key agenda points for future research: (1) approaches that provide integrated frameworks, credible data, and novel methods to better assess multiple policy objectives and inform resource allocation in the context of multiple and competing development goals; (2) strategies that inform scaling efforts through a better understanding of how to develop best-fit approaches that take account of local context for scaling innovations for agronomy and natural resource management; (3) solutions-oriented research through action learning, co-design processes, and evaluations that quantify and qualify real-world impacts of the innovation process in a rigorous and nuanced manner; (4) entry points for organizational and institutional reforms to support innovation processes and scaling; and (5) entry points for supporting and accelerating sustainability transitions and systems-transformation. This agenda highlights the need to consider different technological, organizational, and institutional innovations at multiple scales as well as political and economic factors to better inform policy design and execution in a manner that achieves desired outcomes.
科技创新为低收入和中等收入国家,特别是农业部门的许多紧迫发展问题提供了解决方案。然而,成功的创新几乎总是取决于有利的政策环境。本文回顾了农业创新与公共政策相互作用的研究进展。它围绕着过去60年来形成这一研究主体的三个不同的概念框架和政策叙述进行组织:科学和技术政策框架、创新系统政策框架以及变革创新政策和规模框架。从每个框架中借鉴开创性的研究——包括概念上的和经验上的——我们研究了它们的目的和目标,它们试图解决的政策问题,以及所使用的分析方法。然后,我们确定并讨论了未来研究的五个关键议程点:(1)提供综合框架、可靠数据和新方法的方法,以更好地评估多个政策目标,并在多个相互竞争的发展目标背景下为资源分配提供信息;(2)通过更好地了解如何开发最适合的方法来为扩大规模的努力提供信息的策略,这些方法考虑到农学和自然资源管理的扩大创新的当地情况;(3)以解决方案为导向的研究,通过行动学习、协同设计过程和评估,以严谨细致的方式量化和限定创新过程的现实影响;(4)组织和制度改革的切入点,以支持创新过程和规模;(5)支持和加速可持续转型和系统转型的切入点。这一议程强调需要在多个尺度上考虑不同的技术、组织和制度创新,以及政治和经济因素,以更好地为政策设计和执行提供信息,从而实现预期的结果。
{"title":"Agricultural innovation frames, policies, and instruments: evolution, lessons, and future research","authors":"Catherine Ragasa ,&nbsp;David Spielman ,&nbsp;John Lynam","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.103008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.103008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scientific and technical innovation offers solutions to many pressing development problems in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in the agriculture sector. However, successful innovation is almost always contingent on an enabling policy environment. This paper reviews the evolution of research on the interaction between agricultural innovation and public policy. It is organized around a sequence of three distinct conceptual frameworks and policy narratives that have shaped this body of research over the past 60 years: the science and technology policy frame, the innovation system policy frame, and the transformative innovation policy and scaling frame. Drawing on seminal studies—both conceptual and empirical—from each frame, we examine their aims and objectives, the policy issues they sought to address, and the methods of analysis used. We then identify and discuss five key agenda points for future research: (1) approaches that provide integrated frameworks, credible data, and novel methods to better assess multiple policy objectives and inform resource allocation in the context of multiple and competing development goals; (2) strategies that inform scaling efforts through a better understanding of how to develop best-fit approaches that take account of local context for scaling innovations for agronomy and natural resource management; (3) solutions-oriented research through action learning, co-design processes, and evaluations that quantify and qualify real-world impacts of the innovation process in a rigorous and nuanced manner; (4) entry points for organizational and institutional reforms to support innovation processes and scaling; and (5) entry points for supporting and accelerating sustainability transitions and systems-transformation. This agenda highlights the need to consider different technological, organizational, and institutional innovations at multiple scales as well as political and economic factors to better inform policy design and execution in a manner that achieves desired outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103008"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145614388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expanding tenure horizons in food policy research 扩大粮食政策研究的权属范围
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102995
Ruth Meinzen-Dick , Isabel Lambrecht , Frank Place , Uchendu Eugene Chigbu , Iliana Monterroso , Diana Suhardiman
This paper reviews key trends in research, policy, and practice related to tenure over natural resources, especially land. Economic, anthropological, political, legal, and intrahousehold research have all contributed to broadening the understanding of tenure. Evidence shows that tenure security is associated with many development outcomes, especially with long-term investments that can improve productivity, sustainability, and enhance stewardship of resources, resilient livelihoods, and empowerment of rights holders. However, formalization and individualization reforms have not always led to intended benefits, showing the complexity of tenure and the importance of many contextual factors, including existing security offered by informal systems. Growing evidence on effective community management of commons contributed to devolution programs transferring responsibility and rights over forests, rangelands, irrigation and fisheries to user groups. Large-scale land acquisitions in the wake of the 2009 food price crisis created widespread tenure insecurity, especially for communities without documented land rights. The Voluntary Guidelines on the Governance of Tenure were designed to address these problems, but because they remain voluntary, threats of land expropriation remain. Equity of tenure and outcomes of reform programs have become increasingly prominent as civil society groups from peasant movements, Indigenous Peoples, ethnic minorities, women, and youth have taken up issues of land and resource rights. Further transdisciplinary research is needed to identify policy options and implementation processes that can secure land rights for the marginalized, while also considering rights to resources beyond land, especially as economies transition from rural and agrarian to periurban with diversified livelihoods.
本文综述了与自然资源特别是土地权属相关的研究、政策和实践的主要趋势。经济、人类学、政治、法律和家庭内部的研究都有助于扩大对任期的理解。有证据表明,权属保障与许多发展成果有关,特别是与长期投资有关,这些投资可以提高生产力、可持续性,并加强对资源的管理、有韧性的生计和权利人的赋权。然而,正规化和个体化改革并不总是带来预期的好处,这显示出任期的复杂性和许多相关因素的重要性,包括非正式制度提供的现有保障。越来越多的证据表明,社区对公地的有效管理促进了权力下放项目,将森林、牧场、灌溉和渔业的责任和权利移交给用户群体。2009年粮食价格危机后大规模征地造成了普遍的土地保有不安全,特别是对没有土地权利文件的社区。《租住权管理自愿准则》的目的是解决这些问题,但由于准则是自愿的,征收土地的威胁仍然存在。需要进行进一步的跨学科研究,以确定政策选择和执行过程,以确保边缘化群体的土地权,同时考虑土地以外资源的权利,特别是在经济从农村和农业向拥有多样化生计的城郊地区转型的过程中。
{"title":"Expanding tenure horizons in food policy research","authors":"Ruth Meinzen-Dick ,&nbsp;Isabel Lambrecht ,&nbsp;Frank Place ,&nbsp;Uchendu Eugene Chigbu ,&nbsp;Iliana Monterroso ,&nbsp;Diana Suhardiman","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102995","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102995","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper reviews key trends in research, policy, and practice related to tenure over natural resources, especially land. Economic, anthropological, political, legal, and intrahousehold research have all contributed to broadening the understanding of tenure. Evidence shows that tenure security is associated with many development outcomes, especially with long-term investments that can improve productivity, sustainability, and enhance stewardship of resources, resilient livelihoods, and empowerment of rights holders. However, formalization and individualization reforms have not always led to intended benefits, showing the complexity of tenure and the importance of many contextual factors, including existing security offered by informal systems. Growing evidence on effective community management of commons contributed to devolution programs transferring responsibility and rights over forests, rangelands, irrigation and fisheries to user groups. Large-scale land acquisitions in the wake of the 2009 food price crisis created widespread tenure insecurity, especially for communities without documented land rights. The Voluntary Guidelines on the Governance of Tenure were designed to address these problems, but because they remain voluntary, threats of land expropriation remain. Equity of tenure and outcomes of reform programs have become increasingly prominent as civil society groups from peasant movements, Indigenous Peoples, ethnic minorities, women, and youth have taken up issues of land and resource rights. Further transdisciplinary research is needed to identify policy options and implementation processes that can secure land rights for the marginalized, while also considering rights to resources beyond land, especially as economies transition from rural and agrarian to periurban with diversified livelihoods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 102995"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145575854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Firm’s responses to food policies to reduce consumption of ultra-processed food and beverages: lessons from the existing evidence 公司对减少超加工食品和饮料消费的食品政策的反应:来自现有证据的教训
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102975
Juan Carlos Salgado , Bhairavi Jayaraman , Lindsey Smith Taillie , Shu Wen Ng
Food policies seeking to lower the intake of ultra-processed foods and beverages (a risk factor for obesity and related cardiovascular diseases) are gaining traction. Producer behaviors toward these policies can affect whether policies achieve public health goals. In this narrative review, we synthesize available evidence from ex-ante and ex-post studies since 2015 to assess strategic responses by the food industry to a broad set of mandatory food policies on ultra-processed foods and beverages, including taxes, labeling, marketing restrictions, and claims. Based on 49 papers, we found strategic pricing as the most prevalent assessed producer response, followed by product reformulation, and changes in product portfolio (product entry or exit), marketing, and package size. Evidence to date points towards product reformulation and portfolio changes reinforcing the public health goal for food policies, as these producer responses improve the nutrient profile of available products, albeit unintended consequences can emerge via the use of non-sugar sweeteners. Strategic pricing can strengthen public health goals for food policies when unhealthy products become relatively more expensive than expected compared to healthier options. Otherwise, strategic pricing works against these goals. Mixed results arise from changes in marketing as their post-policy sales effectiveness can shrink, but producers can increase the marketing intensity of unhealthy foods. Evidence of package size changes is scarce and inconclusive. The overall implications of strategic producer responses will depend on market structure and share, their magnitude and scope (producers often respond in a mixture of ways), and how consumers adjust their demand in consequence. Policymakers and researchers should account for strategic producer responses in the policy design and evaluation process.
旨在降低超加工食品和饮料(肥胖和相关心血管疾病的一个风险因素)摄入量的食品政策正在获得支持。生产者对这些政策的行为可以影响政策是否实现公共卫生目标。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们综合了自2015年以来的事前和事后研究的现有证据,以评估食品行业对一系列针对超加工食品和饮料的强制性食品政策的战略反应,包括税收、标签、营销限制和声明。基于49篇论文,我们发现战略定价是最普遍的评估生产者反应,其次是产品重组、产品组合(产品进入或退出)、营销和包装尺寸的变化。迄今为止的证据表明,产品配方和产品组合的变化加强了食品政策的公共卫生目标,因为这些生产商的反应改善了现有产品的营养成分,尽管使用非糖甜味剂可能会产生意想不到的后果。与更健康的选择相比,当不健康的产品变得比预期的更昂贵时,战略性定价可以加强食品政策的公共卫生目标。否则,战略性定价就会违背这些目标。由于政策实施后的销售效果可能会下降,因此营销的变化会产生喜忧参半的结果,但生产者可以增加不健康食品的营销强度。包装尺寸变化的证据很少,也不确定。生产者战略性反应的总体影响将取决于市场结构和份额、其幅度和范围(生产者通常以混合方式作出反应)以及消费者如何相应地调整其需求。政策制定者和研究人员应该在政策设计和评估过程中考虑战略性生产者的反应。
{"title":"Firm’s responses to food policies to reduce consumption of ultra-processed food and beverages: lessons from the existing evidence","authors":"Juan Carlos Salgado ,&nbsp;Bhairavi Jayaraman ,&nbsp;Lindsey Smith Taillie ,&nbsp;Shu Wen Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102975","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102975","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food policies seeking to lower the intake of ultra-processed foods and beverages (a risk factor for obesity and related cardiovascular diseases) are gaining traction. Producer behaviors toward these policies can affect whether policies achieve public health goals. In this narrative review, we synthesize available evidence from ex-ante and ex-post studies since 2015 to assess strategic responses by the food industry to a broad set of mandatory food policies on ultra-processed foods and beverages, including taxes, labeling, marketing restrictions, and claims. Based on 49 papers, we found strategic pricing as the most prevalent assessed producer response, followed by product reformulation, and changes in product portfolio (product entry or exit), marketing, and package size. Evidence to date points towards product reformulation and portfolio changes reinforcing the public health goal for food policies, as these producer responses improve the nutrient profile of available products, albeit unintended consequences can emerge via the use of non-sugar sweeteners. Strategic pricing can strengthen public health goals for food policies when unhealthy products become relatively more expensive than expected compared to healthier options. Otherwise, strategic pricing works against these goals. Mixed results arise from changes in marketing as their post-policy sales effectiveness can shrink, but producers can increase the marketing intensity of unhealthy foods. Evidence of package size changes is scarce and inconclusive. The overall implications of strategic producer responses will depend on market structure and share, their magnitude and scope (producers often respond in a mixture of ways), and how consumers adjust their demand in consequence. Policymakers and researchers should account for strategic producer responses in the policy design and evaluation process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 102975"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145412434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Urbanizing food environments in Africa: Challenges and opportunities for improving accessibility, affordability, convenience, and desirability of healthy diets 非洲城市化的粮食环境:改善健康饮食的可及性、可负担性、便利性和可取性的挑战和机遇
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102981
Hannah Ameye , Vivien Hülsen , Katrin Glatzel , Amos Laar , Matin Qaim
Food environments are changing in a rapidly urbanizing Africa. These changes have important dietary consequences in a region already contending with the triple burden of malnutrition. In this article, we first discuss the challenges associated with defining and measuring food environments in low- and middle-income countries and present recent progress in developing context-appropriate indicators and tools. Further, using mixed methods scoping reviews, we examine how urbanizing food environments affect diets and nutrition in Africa, differentiating between various food environment domains, namely food accessibility, affordability, convenience, and desirability. The findings suggest that urbanization improves stable access to more diverse and nutritious foods. At the same time, urbanizing food environments make ultra-processed foods and other convenient but unhealthy food choices more accessible, affordable, and desirable, contributing to overweight, obesity, and chronic disease risk. We discuss several policy options to improve the healthfulness of food environments, including industry and retail regulation, product labeling, taxes and subsidies, and school feeding programs, among others. National and local policy approaches need to be context-specific and considered within the wider political economy of food environments. We also mention further research needs in terms of measuring food environments and evaluating the effects of policy interventions.
在快速城市化的非洲,粮食环境正在发生变化。这些变化对一个已经面临营养不良三重负担的地区的饮食产生了重要影响。在本文中,我们首先讨论了与定义和衡量中低收入国家粮食环境相关的挑战,并介绍了在制定适合具体情况的指标和工具方面取得的最新进展。此外,使用混合方法进行范围审查,我们研究了城市化的食物环境如何影响非洲的饮食和营养,区分了不同的食物环境领域,即食物可及性、可负担性、便利性和可取性。研究结果表明,城市化改善了对更多样化和更有营养的食物的稳定获取。与此同时,城市化的食品环境使超加工食品和其他方便但不健康的食品选择更容易获得、负担得起和可取,从而导致超重、肥胖和慢性病风险。我们讨论了改善食品环境健康的几种政策选择,包括工业和零售监管、产品标签、税收和补贴以及学校供餐计划等。国家和地方的政策方法需要因地制宜,并在粮食环境的更广泛的政治经济范围内加以考虑。我们还提到在衡量粮食环境和评估政策干预效果方面需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Urbanizing food environments in Africa: Challenges and opportunities for improving accessibility, affordability, convenience, and desirability of healthy diets","authors":"Hannah Ameye ,&nbsp;Vivien Hülsen ,&nbsp;Katrin Glatzel ,&nbsp;Amos Laar ,&nbsp;Matin Qaim","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102981","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102981","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food environments are changing in a rapidly urbanizing Africa. These changes have important dietary consequences in a region already contending with the triple burden of malnutrition. In this article, we first discuss the challenges associated with defining and measuring food environments in low- and middle-income countries and present recent progress in developing context-appropriate indicators and tools. Further, using mixed methods scoping reviews, we examine how urbanizing food environments affect diets and nutrition in Africa, differentiating between various food environment domains, namely food accessibility, affordability, convenience, and desirability. The findings suggest that urbanization improves stable access to more diverse and nutritious foods. At the same time, urbanizing food environments make ultra-processed foods and other convenient but unhealthy food choices more accessible, affordable, and desirable, contributing to overweight, obesity, and chronic disease risk. We discuss several policy options to improve the healthfulness of food environments, including industry and retail regulation, product labeling, taxes and subsidies, and school feeding programs, among others. National and local policy approaches need to be context-specific and considered within the wider political economy of food environments. We also mention further research needs in terms of measuring food environments and evaluating the effects of policy interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 102981"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145412432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating policy and industry-based interventions for healthier online food-away-from-home choices: A scoping review 评估政策和基于行业的干预措施,以促进更健康的在线外出食品选择:范围审查
IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.103006
Vincenzina Caputo , Jiayu Sun , Ellen J. Van Loo
The rapid digital transformation of the food-away-from-home (FAFH) sector has redefined how consumers access and select meals. Digital delivery platforms such as Uber Eats, Deliveroo, and Meituan have become influential market intermediaries, shaping the nutritional landscape of food environments and raising concerns about their healthfulness. This study reviews empirical evidence on policy-based and industry-led interventions aimed at improving dietary outcomes in digital FAFH environments. Following PRISMA guidelines and using machine-learning–assisted screening (ASReview), 37 peer-reviewed studies were identified across four domains: nutritional labeling, fiscal measures, food-assistance programs, and digital nudges or decision-support tools. Findings indicate that although traditional food-policy instruments designed for physical food environments can be adapted to digital contexts, their effects remain modest and context specific. Industry-led interventions, such as menu reordering, healthier defaults, and real-time basket feedback, show encouraging effects on meal quality and calorie reduction when integrated into online platform design. Opportunities also exist to embed digital policies and personalized decision aids within platform interfaces, providing scalable mechanisms for nutrition governance. Yet regulatory ambiguity, limited transparency, and profit-oriented design incentives constrain their reach. Cross-country disparities in market structure, investment, and institutional capacity further restrict policy diffusion, with most evidence drawn from high-income economies. The review calls for governance frameworks that treat digital food-delivery platforms not as passive outlets but as active infrastructures for public-health policy.
外卖(FAFH)行业的快速数字化转型重新定义了消费者获取和选择食物的方式。Uber Eats、Deliveroo和美团等数字外卖平台已经成为有影响力的市场中介,塑造了食品环境的营养格局,并引发了人们对其健康的担忧。本研究回顾了基于政策和行业主导的干预措施的经验证据,这些干预措施旨在改善数字FAFH环境下的饮食结果。遵循PRISMA指南并使用机器学习辅助筛选(ASReview),确定了37项同行评议研究,涉及四个领域:营养标签、财政措施、食品援助计划和数字推动或决策支持工具。研究结果表明,虽然为物理食物环境设计的传统粮食政策工具可以适应数字环境,但其效果仍然有限,且具体情况不同。行业主导的干预措施,如菜单重新排序、更健康的默认设置和实时购物篮反馈,在整合到在线平台设计中后,对膳食质量和卡路里减少显示出令人鼓舞的效果。在平台接口中嵌入数字政策和个性化决策辅助工具也有机会,为营养治理提供可扩展的机制。然而,监管的模糊性、有限的透明度和以利润为导向的设计激励限制了它们的影响力。市场结构、投资和制度能力方面的跨国差异进一步限制了政策的扩散,大多数证据来自高收入经济体。该报告呼吁建立治理框架,将数字送餐平台视为公共卫生政策的主动基础设施,而不是被动渠道。
{"title":"Evaluating policy and industry-based interventions for healthier online food-away-from-home choices: A scoping review","authors":"Vincenzina Caputo ,&nbsp;Jiayu Sun ,&nbsp;Ellen J. Van Loo","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.103006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.103006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid digital transformation of the food-away-from-home (FAFH) sector has redefined how consumers access and select meals. Digital delivery platforms such as Uber Eats, Deliveroo, and Meituan have become influential market intermediaries, shaping the nutritional landscape of food environments and raising concerns about their healthfulness. This study reviews empirical evidence on policy-based and industry-led interventions aimed at improving dietary outcomes in digital FAFH environments. Following PRISMA guidelines and using machine-learning–assisted screening (ASReview), 37 peer-reviewed studies were identified across four domains: nutritional labeling, fiscal measures, food-assistance programs, and digital nudges or decision-support tools. Findings indicate that although traditional food-policy instruments designed for physical food environments can be adapted to digital contexts, their effects remain modest and context specific. Industry-led interventions, such as menu reordering, healthier defaults, and real-time basket feedback, show encouraging effects on meal quality and calorie reduction when integrated into online platform design. Opportunities also exist to embed digital policies and personalized decision aids within platform interfaces, providing scalable mechanisms for nutrition governance. Yet regulatory ambiguity, limited transparency, and profit-oriented design incentives constrain their reach. Cross-country disparities in market structure, investment, and institutional capacity further restrict policy diffusion, with most evidence drawn from high-income economies. The review calls for governance frameworks that treat digital food-delivery platforms not as passive outlets but as active infrastructures for public-health policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103006"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145575856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Food Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1