Pub Date : 2020-12-18DOI: 10.18778/1733-0319.23.03
Joanna Rybowska
{"title":"Magia i religia w świecie starożytnych Greków (zarys problematyki)","authors":"Joanna Rybowska","doi":"10.18778/1733-0319.23.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.23.03","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33406,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42691404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-18DOI: 10.18778/1733-0319.23.01
Paul S. Cohen
After a brief review of prior etymological attempts found in the literature, a complete, rule-governed etymology of Latin nimbus ‘rain cloud, sudden downpour, etc.’ – including a precise explanation of the medial nasal – is propounded. It is based on the Indo-European reduplication process that produces nouns, as delineated by Cohen (2014; 2015; 2017), and on Latin sound laws given and exemplified by Weiss (2009).
{"title":"The Etymology of Latin nimbus (and its Iranian Cognates)","authors":"Paul S. Cohen","doi":"10.18778/1733-0319.23.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.23.01","url":null,"abstract":"After a brief review of prior etymological attempts found in the literature, a complete, rule-governed etymology of Latin nimbus ‘rain cloud, sudden downpour, etc.’ – including a precise explanation of the medial nasal – is propounded. It is based on the Indo-European reduplication process that produces nouns, as delineated by Cohen (2014; 2015; 2017), and on Latin sound laws given and exemplified by Weiss (2009).","PeriodicalId":33406,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48063393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-18DOI: 10.18778/1733-0319.23.09
M. Woźniak
{"title":"Dlaczego walczyłem dla Kupidyna, czyli o walce o średniowieczne rymy w polskim przekładzie Carmina Rivipullensia","authors":"M. Woźniak","doi":"10.18778/1733-0319.23.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.23.09","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33406,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47942232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-30DOI: 10.18778/1733-0319.21.06
Anna Głodowska
{"title":"Obraz Lacedemonu i jego mieszkańców w dialogach Platona","authors":"Anna Głodowska","doi":"10.18778/1733-0319.21.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.21.06","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33406,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44993151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-30DOI: 10.18778/1733-0319.21.10
A. Michalska
The objective of this article is to define place and role of antique motives in modern art and design. Due to variety of creativness in XX/XXI century, created in different trends and beyond them, considerations were limited to sculptural art and design, based on creativness of French artist Leo Caillard and Israeli designer Ayala Serfaty. Interpretation of information, which was collected based on study of artists’ works of art, lead to conclusion that, despite different approach to antique tradition, both artists strive to similar targets and their intention is not imitation, but concept based on creation of surprising or even shocking links and juxtapositions. Research of contrasts between tradition and modernity is intended to provoke and encourage viewer to deeper and conscious interpretation of works of art and reflection about position of art in modern culture. It is essential to study esthetic contexts, circumstances of creation of works of art and motivation. The most important feature of this art is to induce strong impressions. Relations between viewer and work of art have crucial meaning. Approximation and logic of thinking, which are characteristic for each research orientations in history of classic and modern art, represents theoretical background of this article. In this context, there are references to Joachim Winckelmann, recognized as creator of methodological basics for researchment on ancient art. There are references to Franz Wickhoff, Aby Warburg and Erwin Panofsky who dealt with iconographical and iconographical-iconological methods.
{"title":"Recepcja motywów antycznych we współczesnej sztuce na przykładzie twórczości artystów: Léo Caillarda i Ayali Serfaty","authors":"A. Michalska","doi":"10.18778/1733-0319.21.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.21.10","url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article is to define place and role of antique motives in modern art and design. Due to variety of creativness in XX/XXI century, created in different trends and beyond them, considerations were limited to sculptural art and design, based on creativness of French artist Leo Caillard and Israeli designer Ayala Serfaty. Interpretation of information, which was collected based on study of artists’ works of art, lead to conclusion that, despite different approach to antique tradition, both artists strive to similar targets and their intention is not imitation, but concept based on creation of surprising or even shocking links and juxtapositions. Research of contrasts between tradition and modernity is intended to provoke and encourage viewer to deeper and conscious interpretation of works of art and reflection about position of art in modern culture. It is essential to study esthetic contexts, circumstances of creation of works of art and motivation. The most important feature of this art is to induce strong impressions. Relations between viewer and work of art have crucial meaning. Approximation and logic of thinking, which are characteristic for each research orientations in history of classic and modern art, represents theoretical background of this article. In this context, there are references to Joachim Winckelmann, recognized as creator of methodological basics for researchment on ancient art. There are references to Franz Wickhoff, Aby Warburg and Erwin Panofsky who dealt with iconographical and iconographical-iconological methods.","PeriodicalId":33406,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46877454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-30DOI: 10.18778/1733-0319.21.02
K. Narecki
Study on the concept of mneme – “memory” in the plays of Euripides is a continuation of our research (based on the works of Greek tragedians), whose aim is not only to establish meanings, especially new ones, but also to define the role that this concept plays in the works of Euripides. Linguistic and literary analysis of 8 instances of a noun mneme shows that this concept reveals hitherto unknown semantic values and it also performs functions that are important for the plot. Among the meanings of mneme there are five new ones: (1) “testimony, proof” ( Suppliant Women ), whose role is a ‘media’ message to guarantee the preservation of memory about Theseus’ feats among descendants, (2) “account, balance” ( Heracles ), rational argument, which the hero must use in a critical situation caused by divine power, (3) specific “history”, which creates the plot ( Ion ), (4) “reason, rightness” ( Iphigenia at Aulis ), i.e. evidence of predominance of the woman over the man (in terms of character), (5) “image”, twice in this sense ( Iphigenia at Aulis ): 1. as a panorama, vivid memory of panegyric and cognitive nature (Greek expedition), 2. as scenes from Iphigenia’s childhood cited in order to change the decision of Agamemnon. In addition to the new ones, Euripides also uses known meanings: mneme with negation, i.e. the lack of “mentions, memories” (= concealment) becomes an important element of the plot of Helen , guaranteeing its happy ending; in turn mneme as Kreon’s “thought” is a tool for mastering feelings and influencing the development of stage events. All meanings defined by Euripides can be divided into two groups. The first group includes meanings that have rational value: (1) “account, balance”, (2) “thought”, (3) “reason, rightness”. In the other group there are expressive meanings: (1) “testimony, proof”, (2) “mention, memory”, (3) “history”, (4) “image”. Undoubtedly, Euripides not only broadened the semantic scope of the concept of mneme , introducing its new values, but creatively used them in his plays, whether to describe the main characters, or as an element influencing the action, or finally as a testimony of the past that is important for the plot.
对欧里庇得斯戏剧中记忆概念的研究是我们研究（基于希腊悲剧家的作品）的延续，其目的不仅是建立意义，特别是新的意义，而且是定义这一概念在欧里庇得作品中所起的作用。对名词记忆名词8个实例的语言学和文学分析表明，这一概念揭示了迄今为止未知的语义价值，也发挥了对情节重要的功能。在mneme的含义中，有五个新的含义：（1）“见证，证明”（顺从的女人），其作用是一种“媒体”信息，以保证在后裔中保存关于忒修斯壮举的记忆；（2）“叙述，平衡”（赫拉克勒斯），理性论证，英雄必须在神力造成的危急情况下使用；（3）特定的“历史”，它创造了情节（Ion），（4）“理性，正确”（Iphigenia at Aulis），即女性（就性格而言）凌驾于男性之上的证据，（5）“形象”，在这个意义上两次（Iphigeneia at Aulia）：1。作为一幅全景图，生动地记忆了潘涅格里克和认知性质（希腊探险队），2。为了改变阿伽门农的决定，引用了伊菲涅尼亚童年的场景。除了新的意义外，欧里庇得斯还使用了已知的意义：否定的记忆，即缺乏“提及、记忆”（=隐藏）成为海伦情节的一个重要元素，保证了其圆满结局；而记忆作为克里昂的“思想”是掌握情感、影响舞台事件发展的工具。欧里庇得斯定义的所有含义可以分为两组。第一组包括具有理性价值的含义：（1）“账户，平衡”，（2）“思想”，（3）“理性，正确”。在另一组中有表达意义：（1）“证言、证明”，（2）“提及、记忆”，（3）“历史”，（4）“图像”。毫无疑问，欧里庇得斯不仅拓宽了记忆概念的语义范围，引入了它的新价值，而且在他的戏剧中创造性地使用了这些价值，无论是描述主要人物，还是作为影响行动的因素，或者最终作为对情节重要的过去的见证。
{"title":"Z badań nad pojęciem pamięci – mneme w dramacie greckim. Część II: Mneme w utworach Eurypidesa","authors":"K. Narecki","doi":"10.18778/1733-0319.21.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.21.02","url":null,"abstract":"Study on the concept of mneme – “memory” in the plays of Euripides is a continuation of our research (based on the works of Greek tragedians), whose aim is not only to establish meanings, especially new ones, but also to define the role that this concept plays in the works of Euripides. Linguistic and literary analysis of 8 instances of a noun mneme shows that this concept reveals hitherto unknown semantic values and it also performs functions that are important for the plot. Among the meanings of mneme there are five new ones: (1) “testimony, proof” ( Suppliant Women ), whose role is a ‘media’ message to guarantee the preservation of memory about Theseus’ feats among descendants, (2) “account, balance” ( Heracles ), rational argument, which the hero must use in a critical situation caused by divine power, (3) specific “history”, which creates the plot ( Ion ), (4) “reason, rightness” ( Iphigenia at Aulis ), i.e. evidence of predominance of the woman over the man (in terms of character), (5) “image”, twice in this sense ( Iphigenia at Aulis ): 1. as a panorama, vivid memory of panegyric and cognitive nature (Greek expedition), 2. as scenes from Iphigenia’s childhood cited in order to change the decision of Agamemnon. In addition to the new ones, Euripides also uses known meanings: mneme with negation, i.e. the lack of “mentions, memories” (= concealment) becomes an important element of the plot of Helen , guaranteeing its happy ending; in turn mneme as Kreon’s “thought” is a tool for mastering feelings and influencing the development of stage events. All meanings defined by Euripides can be divided into two groups. The first group includes meanings that have rational value: (1) “account, balance”, (2) “thought”, (3) “reason, rightness”. In the other group there are expressive meanings: (1) “testimony, proof”, (2) “mention, memory”, (3) “history”, (4) “image”. Undoubtedly, Euripides not only broadened the semantic scope of the concept of mneme , introducing its new values, but creatively used them in his plays, whether to describe the main characters, or as an element influencing the action, or finally as a testimony of the past that is important for the plot.","PeriodicalId":33406,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49500840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-30DOI: 10.18778/1733-0319.21.12
Magdalena Stuligrosz
The first Polish translation of Gargilius Martialis’ treatise Medicinae de holeribus et pomis ( Medicines from Fruits and Vegetables ) was published in 2016 by Tatiana Krynicka. The translation is accompanied by a valuable commentary which provides the reader with rich information on botanical, medical and dietetic issues, and shows how the 3rd-century Roman author drawn on his literary sources and how he was referred to by late antique writers.
Gargilius Martialis的论文Medicinae de holeribus et pomis（水果和蔬菜中的药物）的第一个波兰语译本于2016年由Tatiana Krynicka出版。该译本附有一篇有价值的评论，为读者提供了关于植物学、医学和营养学问题的丰富信息，并展示了这位3世纪罗马作家是如何利用他的文学来源的，以及他是如何被已故古代作家提及的。
{"title":"Recenzja książki: Gargiliusz, Lekarstwa z owoców i warzyw, przełożyła Tatiana Krynicka, ISKŚIO UWr, Wrocław 2016, (Seria Biblioteka Antyczna), ss. 172","authors":"Magdalena Stuligrosz","doi":"10.18778/1733-0319.21.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.21.12","url":null,"abstract":"The first Polish translation of Gargilius Martialis’ treatise Medicinae de holeribus et pomis ( Medicines from Fruits and Vegetables ) was published in 2016 by Tatiana Krynicka. The translation is accompanied by a valuable commentary which provides the reader with rich information on botanical, medical and dietetic issues, and shows how the 3rd-century Roman author drawn on his literary sources and how he was referred to by late antique writers.","PeriodicalId":33406,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48212541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-12-30DOI: 10.18778/1733-0319.21.08
Joanna Pieczonka
{"title":"Apostrofy do wód – nowe spojrzenie na cykl epigramów w czwartej księdze Marcjalisa (18; 22 i 63)","authors":"Joanna Pieczonka","doi":"10.18778/1733-0319.21.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.21.08","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":33406,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48980294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：