Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2023.1.21-32
M. E. Shalak
A little more than 500 years ago, in the summer of 1521, the Crimean Khan Muhammad-Giray made a campaign against Moscow, thus marking the beginning of almost 250 years of confrontation between Russia and Crimea. This confrontation ended with the defeat of the Crimean Khanate and its incorporation into the Russian Empire. However, there is still no consensus among historians about the assessments of this event. Especially in light of the political events of recent years. Even more broadly, this topic concerns the building of Russian-Tatar cultural interaction in terms of developing their attitude to the common history of Eastern Europe. In the article presented, we will try to understand this through a comprehensive analysis of Russian historical sources of a chronicle nature. To achieve this goal, it will be necessary to establish the main circle of chronicle sources, dividing it into independent groups according to the degree of informativeness. It will also be necessary to identify the main narrative traditions, from the point of view of objectivity, in which the assessments and interpretations of the Tatars’ march on Moscow in 1521 may differ from each other. As a result, 3 main traditions in the coverage of the events of the summer of 1521 will be highlighted. in Russian historical sources of a chronicle nature. The most important chronicle sources in terms of reliability and objectivity include the Vologda-Perm and Resurrection chronicles, Postnikovsky and Vladimir chroniclers. The least reliable and tendentious are the Nikon Chronicle and the Power Book. An intermediate position between the providentialist and rationalist historiosophical position is occupied by the Lviv Chronicle and the Chronograph of the edition of 1512.
{"title":"The campaign of Muhammad Giray I to Moscow in 1521 in the light of a critical analysis of Russian historical sources","authors":"M. E. Shalak","doi":"10.22378/kio.2023.1.21-32","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2023.1.21-32","url":null,"abstract":"A little more than 500 years ago, in the summer of 1521, the Crimean Khan Muhammad-Giray made a campaign against Moscow, thus marking the beginning of almost 250 years of confrontation between Russia and Crimea. This confrontation ended with the defeat of the Crimean Khanate and its incorporation into the Russian Empire. However, there is still no consensus among historians about the assessments of this event. Especially in light of the political events of recent years. Even more broadly, this topic concerns the building of Russian-Tatar cultural interaction in terms of developing their attitude to the common history of Eastern Europe. In the article presented, we will try to understand this through a comprehensive analysis of Russian historical sources of a chronicle nature. To achieve this goal, it will be necessary to establish the main circle of chronicle sources, dividing it into independent groups according to the degree of informativeness. It will also be necessary to identify the main narrative traditions, from the point of view of objectivity, in which the assessments and interpretations of the Tatars’ march on Moscow in 1521 may differ from each other. As a result, 3 main traditions in the coverage of the events of the summer of 1521 will be highlighted. in Russian historical sources of a chronicle nature. The most important chronicle sources in terms of reliability and objectivity include the Vologda-Perm and Resurrection chronicles, Postnikovsky and Vladimir chroniclers. The least reliable and tendentious are the Nikon Chronicle and the Power Book. An intermediate position between the providentialist and rationalist historiosophical position is occupied by the Lviv Chronicle and the Chronograph of the edition of 1512.","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48086935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2023.1.10-20
I. Zaytsev
The article publishes the Arabic text and the translation into Russian of a letter from the Crimean scholar, poet and judge Abdallah b. Ibrahim ’Afif ad-Din-efendi (? – 1640, Kafa) to sheikh Yahya, the custodian of the tomb of Muhya ad-Din Ibn Arabi in the Damascus quarter of Salihiya. The letter may be dated to the 1630s. This letter is an example of the close ties that existed between the Crimean medieval scientists and their brethren in Syria.
这篇文章发表了克里米亚学者、诗人和法官阿卜杜拉·b·易卜拉欣·阿夫夫·丁·埃芬迪(Abdallah b. Ibrahim ' Afif ad-Din-efendi)的一封信的阿拉伯文文本和俄文译文。(1640年，卡法)献给谢赫·叶海亚，他是大马士革Salihiya区的Muhya ad-Din Ibn Arabi墓的监护人。这封信可能写于17世纪30年代。这封信是克里米亚中世纪科学家和他们在叙利亚的兄弟之间存在的密切联系的一个例子。
{"title":"A letter from the Crimean scholar Abdallah b. Ibrahim ’Afif ad-Din-efendi to sheikh Yahya, the custodian of the tomb of Muhya ad-Din Ibn Arabi in Damascus (1630s)","authors":"I. Zaytsev","doi":"10.22378/kio.2023.1.10-20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2023.1.10-20","url":null,"abstract":"The article publishes the Arabic text and the translation into Russian of a letter from the Crimean scholar, poet and judge Abdallah b. Ibrahim ’Afif ad-Din-efendi (? – 1640, Kafa) to sheikh Yahya, the custodian of the tomb of Muhya ad-Din Ibn Arabi in the Damascus quarter of Salihiya. The letter may be dated to the 1630s. This letter is an example of the close ties that existed between the Crimean medieval scientists and their brethren in Syria.","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46437219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2022.1.189-214
R. Abduzhemilev
The Chronicle “Tarikh-I Mehmed Geray” (1682–1703) by Crimean Tatar historiographer Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarak Geray Ginghisi is the narrative source reflecting the history of the Ottoman state in 1682–1703. The date of the work is 1703 (completed in the month of Rejeb 1115). A copy of the chronicle has been preserved in the funds of the Austrian National Library (Österreichische Nationalbibliothek) under the cipher (inventory number). No. 1080, Cod. H.O.86 HAN MAG. Volume (folio) – 125 sheets in taalik script, sheets are small. There are verses on 125 sheets. The manuscript is not marked with the title, but has an appraisal prescript: “Tarih-i Mehmed Geray: Qara Mustafa Paşa cenklerin söyler Avcı Sultan Mehmed Han vaqtlarından Sultan Ahmed Han, biñ yüz on beş tarihınacek söyler bir maqbul tarihdır” / “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray: the generally accepted history in the narration about the wars of Kara Mustafa Pasha, since the times of Avjy (“The Hunter”) Sultan Mehmed Khan till Sultan Ahmed Khan, up to the year one thousand one hundred and fifteen”. The translation of the Chronicle’s extracts into Russian (the author of the translation is R.R. Abduzhemilev) was made from the manuscript’s transliteration into Latin, presented in the Turkish edition of Ughur Demir’s master thesis “Tarikh-i Mehmed Giray” (assessment – text’s transcription) ”(consultant: Prof. Dr. Nejdet Öztürk, Istanbul, 2006, 163 pages).
克里米亚鞑靼史官Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarak Geray Ginghisi的编年史“Tarikh-I Mehmed Geray”（1682–1703）是反映1682–1700年奥斯曼国家历史的叙事来源。这项工作的日期是1703年（完成于1115年的利结月）。该编年史的一份副本以密码（库存编号）保存在奥地利国家图书馆（Österreichische National bibliothek）的资金中。1080号，代码。H.O.86《韩》卷（对开本）125张，用塔里克文书写，张数较小。125张纸上有诗句。手稿没有标明标题，但有一个评估规定：“塔里赫·迈赫迈德·杰莱：卡拉·穆斯塔法·帕沙·森克勒林·阿夫奇苏丹·迈赫默德·汉·瓦克斯塔尔·伊丹苏丹·艾哈迈德·汉，比尼尤兹on beşTarihınacek söyler bir maqbul tarihdır”/“塔里赫·迈赫迈德·杰莱：关于卡拉·穆斯塔法帕夏战争的叙述中普遍接受的历史苏丹艾哈迈德·汗，至一千一百一十五年”。《纪事报》摘录的俄文翻译（翻译作者是R.R.Abduzzhemilev）是根据Ughur Demir的硕士论文“Tarikh-i Mehmed Giray”（评估-文本转录）土耳其语版中的手稿音译而成的（顾问：NejdetÖztürk教授博士，伊斯坦布尔，2006年，163页）。
{"title":"Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarek Geray Genghisi. The Chronicle “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray” (“Mehmed Geray’s History”). Part 1","authors":"R. Abduzhemilev","doi":"10.22378/kio.2022.1.189-214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2022.1.189-214","url":null,"abstract":"The Chronicle “Tarikh-I Mehmed Geray” (1682–1703) by Crimean Tatar historiographer Dervish Mehmed bin Mubarak Geray Ginghisi is the narrative source reflecting the history of the Ottoman state in 1682–1703. The date of the work is 1703 (completed in the month of Rejeb 1115). A copy of the chronicle has been preserved in the funds of the Austrian National Library (Österreichische Nationalbibliothek) under the cipher (inventory number). No. 1080, Cod. H.O.86 HAN MAG. Volume (folio) – 125 sheets in taalik script, sheets are small. There are verses on 125 sheets. The manuscript is not marked with the title, but has an appraisal prescript: “Tarih-i Mehmed Geray: Qara Mustafa Paşa cenklerin söyler Avcı Sultan Mehmed Han vaqtlarından Sultan Ahmed Han, biñ yüz on beş tarihınacek söyler bir maqbul tarihdır” / “Tarikh-i Mehmed Geray: the generally accepted history in the narration about the wars of Kara Mustafa Pasha, since the times of Avjy (“The Hunter”) Sultan Mehmed Khan till Sultan Ahmed Khan, up to the year one thousand one hundred and fifteen”. The translation of the Chronicle’s extracts into Russian (the author of the translation is R.R. Abduzhemilev) was made from the manuscript’s transliteration into Latin, presented in the Turkish edition of Ughur Demir’s master thesis “Tarikh-i Mehmed Giray” (assessment – text’s transcription) ”(consultant: Prof. Dr. Nejdet Öztürk, Istanbul, 2006, 163 pages).","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47512106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2023.1.120-146
Ismet A. Zaatov
In the article an attempt is made to trace the stages of development of the process of the Kypchak-Tatar – Turko-Seljuk Turkization and the beginning of the process of Asia Minor–Central Asian Islamization of the population of the peninsula and formation of artistic culture and decorative art of the Crimean Tatars during the formation of the foundations of the Crimean Tatar statehood in the Black Sea uluses of the Golden Horde.
{"title":"Ethno-cultural basis of the process of formation of the Crimean Tatar artistic culture and decorative art (part three)","authors":"Ismet A. Zaatov","doi":"10.22378/kio.2023.1.120-146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2023.1.120-146","url":null,"abstract":"In the article an attempt is made to trace the stages of development of the process of the Kypchak-Tatar – Turko-Seljuk Turkization and the beginning of the process of Asia Minor–Central Asian Islamization of the population of the peninsula and formation of artistic culture and decorative art of the Crimean Tatars during the formation of the foundations of the Crimean Tatar statehood in the Black Sea uluses of the Golden Horde.","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41482062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2023.1.97-105
Ismail A. Kerimov
Cemil Kermenchili is one of the brightestCrimean Tatar poets of the 20th century, who played significant role in the development of the national poetic word in Crimea. In the article, on the basis of new materials recently found in the central and in the repositories of regional libraries in Russia, new facets of his work are revealed and many refinements are made to the development of the author`s scientific biography. Attention is paid to the rich journalistic component of his work. The appendix to the article contains unknown poetic works of the author relating to the period of the First World War.
{"title":"Literary and cultural character of Cemil Seitabla Kermenchikli (1891–1942)","authors":"Ismail A. Kerimov","doi":"10.22378/kio.2023.1.97-105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2023.1.97-105","url":null,"abstract":"Cemil Kermenchili is one of the brightestCrimean Tatar poets of the 20th century, who played significant role in the development of the national poetic word in Crimea. In the article, on the basis of new materials recently found in the central and in the repositories of regional libraries in Russia, new facets of his work are revealed and many refinements are made to the development of the author`s scientific biography. Attention is paid to the rich journalistic component of his work. The appendix to the article contains unknown poetic works of the author relating to the period of the First World War.","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49610208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2023.1.220-232
V. Bobrovnikov
Author of the article analyzes the 3rd volume of the History of the Crimean Tatars, dedicated to the Crimean Khanate of the15th–18th centuries, published in Kazan in 2021, and resulted from the 2-year international research project aiming to produce the first academic History of the Crimean Tatars in a five volumes. This is a pioneering and valuable research covering the whole period of the Khanate history, from its formation in the first half of the 15th century to its annexation to the Russian Empire under the reign of Catherine the Great, who abolished the Khanate in 1783. The book discusses different aspects of the Khanate’s everyday life: its conquests and frequent raids against non-Muslim neighbors, foreign and domestic politics, Crimean Tatars’ economy, slave trade, spiritual and material culture, religion, military affairs, demography, their relationship with ethnic and confessional minorities of the Khanate and their Diaspora abroad, images of the Crimean Tatars as the Other constructed and later Orientalized by foreign travelers and observers from Western Europe, Ukraine and Russia. In fact, this book rehabilitates the Crimean Khanate, showing that it was not just a robber’s nest, living off raids on neighbors and the international slave trade, as the late Soviet literature argued. The study fills in a significant gap in contemporary historiography on the subject in the field of Oriental, Russian, Polish, and Ukrainian studies. It also contributes to comparative history of the northern Black sea area at the turn of the early modern times. It is noteworthy that the new series on History of the Crimean Tatars does not dismiss the legacy of the anti-Crimean Soviet literature categorically, but attempts to rethink it all creatively, starting with the pre-revolutionary classic study written by V.D. Smirnov. It resumes revisionist historiography of the Crimean Khanate from Perestroika to the present day proposing possible alternative readings of its history.
{"title":"Rehabilitation of the Crimean Khanate by Historians in a five-volumes book about the Crimean Tatars","authors":"V. Bobrovnikov","doi":"10.22378/kio.2023.1.220-232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2023.1.220-232","url":null,"abstract":"Author of the article analyzes the 3rd volume of the History of the Crimean Tatars, dedicated to the Crimean Khanate of the15th–18th centuries, published in Kazan in 2021, and resulted from the 2-year international research project aiming to produce the first academic History of the Crimean Tatars in a five volumes. This is a pioneering and valuable research covering the whole period of the Khanate history, from its formation in the first half of the 15th century to its annexation to the Russian Empire under the reign of Catherine the Great, who abolished the Khanate in 1783. The book discusses different aspects of the Khanate’s everyday life: its conquests and frequent raids against non-Muslim neighbors, foreign and domestic politics, Crimean Tatars’ economy, slave trade, spiritual and material culture, religion, military affairs, demography, their relationship with ethnic and confessional minorities of the Khanate and their Diaspora abroad, images of the Crimean Tatars as the Other constructed and later Orientalized by foreign travelers and observers from Western Europe, Ukraine and Russia. In fact, this book rehabilitates the Crimean Khanate, showing that it was not just a robber’s nest, living off raids on neighbors and the international slave trade, as the late Soviet literature argued. The study fills in a significant gap in contemporary historiography on the subject in the field of Oriental, Russian, Polish, and Ukrainian studies. It also contributes to comparative history of the northern Black sea area at the turn of the early modern times. It is noteworthy that the new series on History of the Crimean Tatars does not dismiss the legacy of the anti-Crimean Soviet literature categorically, but attempts to rethink it all creatively, starting with the pre-revolutionary classic study written by V.D. Smirnov. It resumes revisionist historiography of the Crimean Khanate from Perestroika to the present day proposing possible alternative readings of its history.","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45853370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2023.1.106-119
L. Gabdrafikova
The article tells about the life and work of the Tatar poet Sagit Suncheley (1888–1937), it is written on the basis of his ego-documents. He lived in the Crimea in 1919–1924, was a witness to historical events and a participant in the Soviet cultural construction. His letters and diaries, literary and journalistic works illustrate the everyday life of the Crimean population during the Civil War, including the life of a Soviet nomenklatura worker. In addition, these ego-documents supplement information about the work of the Tatar departments of Soviet institutions in the Crimean ASSR.
{"title":"Tatar poet Sagit Suncheley and Crimea in the early 1920s","authors":"L. Gabdrafikova","doi":"10.22378/kio.2023.1.106-119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2023.1.106-119","url":null,"abstract":"The article tells about the life and work of the Tatar poet Sagit Suncheley (1888–1937), it is written on the basis of his ego-documents. He lived in the Crimea in 1919–1924, was a witness to historical events and a participant in the Soviet cultural construction. His letters and diaries, literary and journalistic works illustrate the everyday life of the Crimean population during the Civil War, including the life of a Soviet nomenklatura worker. In addition, these ego-documents supplement information about the work of the Tatar departments of Soviet institutions in the Crimean ASSR.","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41333371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2023.1.33-86
A. Fisher
This work is a translation from English of the second part of the scientific work of Alan Fisher, the famous historian, professor at Michigan State University, USA. His work The Crimean Tatars was published in 1978 in the USA. In the second part of the book, the author considers the following issues: 1. Reorganization of Crimea; 2. Catherine II and Islam; 3. Administrative structure; 4. Tatar nobility; 5. Crimean clergy; 6. Tatar emigration; 7. Russian colonization; 8. Russian administration of Crimea in the 19th century; 9. Administrative structure organization; 10. Tatar mirza class; 11. Tatar land ownership; 12. Military service of the Tatars; 13. Cities of the Crimea 14. Tatar peasants. 15. Crimean Tatar national awakening; 16. Destruction of Tatar architecture; 17. Russia and Crimean Islam; 18. Education; 19. Gaspraly (I. Gasprinsky); 20. Gaspraly’s followers; 21. Young Tatars. In general, the second part of the work considers the Russian period of stay of the Crimea.
{"title":"The Crimean Tatars (3)","authors":"A. Fisher","doi":"10.22378/kio.2023.1.33-86","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2023.1.33-86","url":null,"abstract":"This work is a translation from English of the second part of the scientific work of Alan Fisher, the famous historian, professor at Michigan State University, USA. His work The Crimean Tatars was published in 1978 in the USA. In the second part of the book, the author considers the following issues: 1. Reorganization of Crimea; 2. Catherine II and Islam; 3. Administrative structure; 4. Tatar nobility; 5. Crimean clergy; 6. Tatar emigration; 7. Russian colonization; 8. Russian administration of Crimea in the 19th century; 9. Administrative structure organization; 10. Tatar mirza class; 11. Tatar land ownership; 12. Military service of the Tatars; 13. Cities of the Crimea 14. Tatar peasants. 15. Crimean Tatar national awakening; 16. Destruction of Tatar architecture; 17. Russia and Crimean Islam; 18. Education; 19. Gaspraly (I. Gasprinsky); 20. Gaspraly’s followers; 21. Young Tatars. In general, the second part of the work considers the Russian period of stay of the Crimea.","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46569116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2023.1.198-219
R. Abduzhemilev
Among the rare materials of the Department of Manuscripts of the National Library of France (Bibliotheque nationale de France. Departement des Manuscrits. Supplement turc 515) there is a small chronicle of the anonymous author dating back to the era of the Crimean Khanate. The manuscript is provided with a description: “The history of the Crimean khans from 880 to 1191 from the Hegira (1475–1777), without a title and without the name of the author. The epigraph read on the front side of the first page is not a title, but a summary of the content of this work, which is not of particular importance. Dating: 1786–1800”. Although this chronicle is known thanks to the researches of a number of orientalists, nevertheless, for its full introduction into scientific circulation, its translation into Russian is of the uttermost necessity. The text processing will serve as the basis for the literary and artistic analysis of “The History of the Crimean Khans”.
{"title":"“The History of the Crimean Khans” by the anonymous author. Part 2 (end)","authors":"R. Abduzhemilev","doi":"10.22378/kio.2023.1.198-219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2023.1.198-219","url":null,"abstract":"Among the rare materials of the Department of Manuscripts of the National Library of France (Bibliotheque nationale de France. Departement des Manuscrits. Supplement turc 515) there is a small chronicle of the anonymous author dating back to the era of the Crimean Khanate. The manuscript is provided with a description: “The history of the Crimean khans from 880 to 1191 from the Hegira (1475–1777), without a title and without the name of the author. The epigraph read on the front side of the first page is not a title, but a summary of the content of this work, which is not of particular importance. Dating: 1786–1800”. Although this chronicle is known thanks to the researches of a number of orientalists, nevertheless, for its full introduction into scientific circulation, its translation into Russian is of the uttermost necessity. The text processing will serve as the basis for the literary and artistic analysis of “The History of the Crimean Khans”.","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49327115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-03DOI: 10.22378/kio.2023.1.147-161
Sevilya S. Velieva
The article gives a detailed descripton of the musical instruments of the Crimean Tatars, which are presented in the collection of the Bakhchisarai Museum-Reserve and are interesting for studying musical culture in general. The history of formation of the collection of musical instruments is connected with the creation of the Museum of Turkic-Tatar Culture in Bakhchisarai. In the 1920s and 30s, the staff of the institution collected a large number of antiquities, including musical instruments. In scientific works devoted to the music of the Crimean Tatar people, researchers mainly paid attention to the songs, melodies and partially mentioned traditional instruments. In this work, it is assumed to study the issues of acquisition, cataloging, classification of musical instruments, as well as determining the characteristic features of these items. The research will be relevant for further use in creating expositions, excursion stories, possibly also in recreating folk instruments and playing them.
{"title":"Musical instruments of the Crimean Tatars in the collection of the Bakhchisarai Museum-Reserve","authors":"Sevilya S. Velieva","doi":"10.22378/kio.2023.1.147-161","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2023.1.147-161","url":null,"abstract":"The article gives a detailed descripton of the musical instruments of the Crimean Tatars, which are presented in the collection of the Bakhchisarai Museum-Reserve and are interesting for studying musical culture in general. The history of formation of the collection of musical instruments is connected with the creation of the Museum of Turkic-Tatar Culture in Bakhchisarai. In the 1920s and 30s, the staff of the institution collected a large number of antiquities, including musical instruments. In scientific works devoted to the music of the Crimean Tatar people, researchers mainly paid attention to the songs, melodies and partially mentioned traditional instruments. In this work, it is assumed to study the issues of acquisition, cataloging, classification of musical instruments, as well as determining the characteristic features of these items. The research will be relevant for further use in creating expositions, excursion stories, possibly also in recreating folk instruments and playing them.","PeriodicalId":34588,"journal":{"name":"Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45085795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：