Objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the experiences of informal caregivers' feeding practices for children with cancer.
Introduction: Changes in eating among children with cancer impact their nutritional status, leading to several negative outcomes. In addition to interventions given by health care providers, informal caregivers' experiences in feeding these children are worth exploring.
Inclusion criteria: This review will include qualitative studies or the qualitative component of mixed method studies examining informal caregivers' experiences of feeding children with cancer who are under 18 years of age. Children may be in any phase of the cancer journey, and may be at a health care facility or at home. Studies from any country, published in English or Thai in any year up to the present, will be considered for inclusion.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI approach for qualitative systematic reviews. A full search strategy for PubMed was developed from an initial limited search of PubMed and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) to identify articles on the topic. The search strategy will be adapted for each database, including Embase (Ovid), PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), LILACS (BVS), PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and ThaiJO (TCI). The reference lists of studies included in the review will be hand-searched for additional studies. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will also be searched. Two reviewers will separately screen for eligible studies, perform the critical appraisal, and extract data. They will then synthesize via meta-aggregation and summarize the data. The final synthesized findings will be graded using the ConQual approach to establish confidence in the qualitative research synthesis.
{"title":"Informal caregivers' feeding experiences for children with cancer: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Donruedee Kamkhoad, Tippawan Srichalerm, Porawan Witwaranukool","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00081","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to synthesize the experiences of informal caregivers' feeding practices for children with cancer.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Changes in eating among children with cancer impact their nutritional status, leading to several negative outcomes. In addition to interventions given by health care providers, informal caregivers' experiences in feeding these children are worth exploring.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include qualitative studies or the qualitative component of mixed method studies examining informal caregivers' experiences of feeding children with cancer who are under 18 years of age. Children may be in any phase of the cancer journey, and may be at a health care facility or at home. Studies from any country, published in English or Thai in any year up to the present, will be considered for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI approach for qualitative systematic reviews. A full search strategy for PubMed was developed from an initial limited search of PubMed and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) to identify articles on the topic. The search strategy will be adapted for each database, including Embase (Ovid), PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), LILACS (BVS), PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and ThaiJO (TCI). The reference lists of studies included in the review will be hand-searched for additional studies. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will also be searched. Two reviewers will separately screen for eligible studies, perform the critical appraisal, and extract data. They will then synthesize via meta-aggregation and summarize the data. The final synthesized findings will be graded using the ConQual approach to establish confidence in the qualitative research synthesis.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024501382.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"181-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00509
Mara Lambert, Melanie Dankel
{"title":"A year in review: innovations and insights from 2024.","authors":"Mara Lambert, Melanie Dankel","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00509","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00509","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00540
Kavita Kachroo, Annie NithiyaVathani Johnson, S A K Moinudeen, Jitendra Sharma, Cheryl Holly
Objective: This systematic review examines the evidence on the incidence and prevalence of inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Introduction: IEMs are a set of conditions that can either be inherited or result from spontaneous mutations. Although each condition is rare in isolation, various specific disorders within the IEM group have an estimated global prevalence of 50.9 per 100,000 live births. A precise estimate of the prevalence and incidence of IEMs in LMICs can help determine the necessity for extensive newborn screening programs.
Inclusion criteria: This review will cover studies conducted in LMICs, reporting on IEMs in infants and children under the age of 5 years. Studies that calculate birth prevalence and incidence of IEMs will be included. Studies that provide information on the causes, clinical characteristics, treatment, case fatality rates, mortality rates, and other outcomes will also be considered.
Methods: The databases to be searched include PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and gray literature sources. No date or language restrictions will be applied. Our search will encompass analytical and descriptive observational studies, which will be critically appraised by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted using JBI data extraction tools. If sufficient data are available, a meta-analysis will be performed. Alternatively, if data are limited, we will present our findings in narrative format using tables and figures.
{"title":"Epidemiological burden of inborn errors of metabolism in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Kavita Kachroo, Annie NithiyaVathani Johnson, S A K Moinudeen, Jitendra Sharma, Cheryl Holly","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00540","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00540","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review examines the evidence on the incidence and prevalence of inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>IEMs are a set of conditions that can either be inherited or result from spontaneous mutations. Although each condition is rare in isolation, various specific disorders within the IEM group have an estimated global prevalence of 50.9 per 100,000 live births. A precise estimate of the prevalence and incidence of IEMs in LMICs can help determine the necessity for extensive newborn screening programs.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will cover studies conducted in LMICs, reporting on IEMs in infants and children under the age of 5 years. Studies that calculate birth prevalence and incidence of IEMs will be included. Studies that provide information on the causes, clinical characteristics, treatment, case fatality rates, mortality rates, and other outcomes will also be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases to be searched include PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and gray literature sources. No date or language restrictions will be applied. Our search will encompass analytical and descriptive observational studies, which will be critically appraised by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted using JBI data extraction tools. If sufficient data are available, a meta-analysis will be performed. Alternatively, if data are limited, we will present our findings in narrative format using tables and figures.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023457421.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"143-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the existing qualitative evidence on the breastfeeding experiences of mothers of hospitalized preterm infants.
Introduction: Breastfeeding is crucial for the well-being and development of preterm infants born before 37 weeks' gestation. Mothers of preterm infants often face challenges that make breastfeeding particularly complex. Understanding mothers' breastfeeding experience is important for health care professionals, as it enables them to provide appropriate support and assistance. The qualitative evidence synthesis regarding the breastfeeding experiences of mothers of preterm infants in hospital settings is a valuable area of research that has not been documented.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider all qualitative studies that explore mothers' experiences of breastfeeding and mother's own milk management for their hospitalized infants. Mothers of preterm infants who provide their own milk to their infants will be considered, regardless of their age, gravidity, parity, singleton/multiple pregnancies, gender identity, marital status, social status, or preterm infant's gestational age.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI approach for qualitative systematic review. The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies, with no date limit. A search of PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Embase (EBSCOhost) will be undertaken to identify articles on the topic. Studies published in English will be considered for inclusion in this review. Two independent reviewers will evaluate the methodological validity of the selected papers before incorporating them into the review. Data synthesis will be conducted using the meta-aggregation approach, and synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach.
{"title":"Experiences of breastfeeding among mothers of preterm infants during their infants' hospital stay: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Tippawan Srichalerm, Donruedee Kamkhoad, Ratchanok Phonyiam","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00078","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to synthesize the existing qualitative evidence on the breastfeeding experiences of mothers of hospitalized preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breastfeeding is crucial for the well-being and development of preterm infants born before 37 weeks' gestation. Mothers of preterm infants often face challenges that make breastfeeding particularly complex. Understanding mothers' breastfeeding experience is important for health care professionals, as it enables them to provide appropriate support and assistance. The qualitative evidence synthesis regarding the breastfeeding experiences of mothers of preterm infants in hospital settings is a valuable area of research that has not been documented.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider all qualitative studies that explore mothers' experiences of breastfeeding and mother's own milk management for their hospitalized infants. Mothers of preterm infants who provide their own milk to their infants will be considered, regardless of their age, gravidity, parity, singleton/multiple pregnancies, gender identity, marital status, social status, or preterm infant's gestational age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI approach for qualitative systematic review. The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies, with no date limit. A search of PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Embase (EBSCOhost) will be undertaken to identify articles on the topic. Studies published in English will be considered for inclusion in this review. Two independent reviewers will evaluate the methodological validity of the selected papers before incorporating them into the review. Data synthesis will be conducted using the meta-aggregation approach, and synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024501454.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2611-2617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630659/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shaminder Dhillon, Michelle Ira Roque, Dina Brooks, Sarah Wojkowski
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to identify strategies in the literature that may increase the accessibility of health professional programs for students with disabilities.
Introduction: The number of students with disabilities in health professional programs is increasing. However, since students with disabilities experience barriers to education, their retention rates are potentially lower and their attrition rates are potentially higher compared with their non-disabled peers.
Inclusion criteria: Academic and gray literature that identifies strategies intended to increase accessibility to health professional programs for students with disabilities will be included. Only articles published from 2000 onward will be considered for inclusion.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ERIC (ProQuest), and Web of Science. Gray literature will be searched for using Google. Websites of known disability organizations will also be searched. There will be no language limitations. Paired reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, and then full-text articles. Data will be extracted using a tool developed by the reviewers. The extracted data will be synthesized and reported in tabular format, accompanied by a narrative summary connecting the results to the objective of the review.
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/bsyrt.
目标：本范围综述的目的是在文献中找出可提高残疾学生就读健康专业课程无障碍性的策略：健康专业课程中的残疾学生人数正在增加。然而，由于残疾学生在接受教育时会遇到障碍，因此与非残疾学生相比，他们的保留率可能较低，自然减员率可能较高：纳入标准：纳入学术和灰色文献，这些文献确定了旨在提高残疾学生就读卫生专业课程无障碍性的策略。只有 2000 年以后发表的文章才会被考虑纳入：本综述将采用 JBI 的方法进行范围界定综述。将检索的数据库包括 Embase (Ovid)、MEDLINE (Ovid)、PsycINFO (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、ERIC (ProQuest) 和 Web of Science。将使用谷歌搜索灰色文献。还将搜索已知残疾组织的网站。没有语言限制。配对审稿人将独立筛选标题和摘要，然后再筛选全文。将使用审稿人开发的工具提取数据。提取的数据将以表格形式进行综合和报告，并附有叙述性摘要，将结果与综述目标联系起来。本范围综述协议已在开放科学框架中注册：https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BSYRT。
{"title":"Strategies to increase accessibility for students with disabilities in health professional programs: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Shaminder Dhillon, Michelle Ira Roque, Dina Brooks, Sarah Wojkowski","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00484","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00484","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to identify strategies in the literature that may increase the accessibility of health professional programs for students with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of students with disabilities in health professional programs is increasing. However, since students with disabilities experience barriers to education, their retention rates are potentially lower and their attrition rates are potentially higher compared with their non-disabled peers.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Academic and gray literature that identifies strategies intended to increase accessibility to health professional programs for students with disabilities will be included. Only articles published from 2000 onward will be considered for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched will include Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ERIC (ProQuest), and Web of Science. Gray literature will be searched for using Google. Websites of known disability organizations will also be searched. There will be no language limitations. Paired reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, and then full-text articles. Data will be extracted using a tool developed by the reviewers. The extracted data will be synthesized and reported in tabular format, accompanied by a narrative summary connecting the results to the objective of the review.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/bsyrt.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2625-2635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Denis Satoshi Komoda, Marilia Mastrocolla de Almeida Cardoso, Brígida Dias Fernandes, Marília Berlofa Visacri, Carlos Roberto Silveira Correa
Objective: This scoping review aims to map studies that applied artificial intelligence (AI) tools to perform health technology assessment tasks in human health care. The review also aims to understand specific processes in which the AI tools were applied and to comprehend the technical characteristics of these tools.
Introduction: Health technology assessment is a complex, time-consuming, and labor-intensive endeavor. The development of automation techniques using AI has opened up new avenues for accelerating such assessments in human health settings. This could potentially aid health technology assessment researchers and decision-makers to deliver higher quality evidence.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider studies that assess the use of AI tools in any process of health technology assessment in human health. However, publications in which AI is a means of clinical aid, such as diagnostics or surgery will be excluded.
Methods: A search for relevant articles will be conducted in databases such as CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (PubMed), Science Direct, Computer and Applied Sciences Complete (EBSCOhost), LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. A search for gray literature will be conducted in GreyLit.Org, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar, and the Google search engine. No language filters will be applied. Screening, selection, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers. The results will be presented in graphic and tabular format, accompanied by a narrative summary.
Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/3rm8g.
目的：本范围综述旨在对应用人工智能（AI）工具执行人类医疗保健领域健康技术评估任务的研究进行梳理。综述还旨在了解应用人工智能工具的具体过程，并理解这些工具的技术特点：医疗技术评估是一项复杂、耗时且劳动密集型的工作。人工智能自动化技术的发展为加速人类健康环境中的此类评估开辟了新途径。这有可能帮助卫生技术评估研究人员和决策者提供更高质量的证据：本综述将考虑评估人工智能工具在人类健康的任何健康技术评估过程中使用情况的研究。但是，人工智能作为临床辅助手段（如诊断或手术）的出版物将被排除在外：将在 CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Embase (Ovid)、MEDLINE (PubMed)、Science Direct、Computer and Applied Sciences Complete (EBSCOhost)、LILACS、Scopus 和 Web of Science Core Collection 等数据库中搜索相关文章。将在 GreyLit.Org、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses、Google Scholar 和 Google 搜索引擎中搜索灰色文献。不使用语言过滤器。筛选、选择和数据提取将由两名独立审稿人完成。结果将以图形和表格的形式呈现，并附有叙述性摘要。本综述的详细信息可在开放科学框架中找到：osf.io/3rm8g。
{"title":"Artificial intelligence applied in human health technology assessment: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Denis Satoshi Komoda, Marilia Mastrocolla de Almeida Cardoso, Brígida Dias Fernandes, Marília Berlofa Visacri, Carlos Roberto Silveira Correa","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00377","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map studies that applied artificial intelligence (AI) tools to perform health technology assessment tasks in human health care. The review also aims to understand specific processes in which the AI tools were applied and to comprehend the technical characteristics of these tools.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health technology assessment is a complex, time-consuming, and labor-intensive endeavor. The development of automation techniques using AI has opened up new avenues for accelerating such assessments in human health settings. This could potentially aid health technology assessment researchers and decision-makers to deliver higher quality evidence.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies that assess the use of AI tools in any process of health technology assessment in human health. However, publications in which AI is a means of clinical aid, such as diagnostics or surgery will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search for relevant articles will be conducted in databases such as CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (PubMed), Science Direct, Computer and Applied Sciences Complete (EBSCOhost), LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. A search for gray literature will be conducted in GreyLit.Org, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar, and the Google search engine. No language filters will be applied. Screening, selection, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers. The results will be presented in graphic and tabular format, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/3rm8g.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2559-2566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Louise M W Mathiesen, Bettan Bagger, Ditte Høgsgaard, Martine V Nielsen, Sissel S Gjedsig, Mai-Britt Hägi-Pedersen
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to explore, report, and map the evidence on education and training programs for current and future health professionals' competence in virtual consultations.
Introduction: Digital solutions, telemedicine, and technologies are increasingly becoming a part of the health system, requiring current and future health professionals to master skills in these domains.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider any studies on education and training programs designed to optimize current and future health professionals' competence in virtual consultations in any setting, such as faculties, universities, university colleges, hospitals, or community locations.
Methods: This review will be guided by the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished sources of information will be searched for in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), and Scopus. Studies written in English, German, Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian will be considered, with no geographical or cultural limitations. Two independent reviewers will screen retrieved papers, and a standardized tool will be used to extract data from each included source. The results of the extracted data will be presented in tabular format, together with a narrative summary of the evidence.
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/bsmuy.
{"title":"Education and training programs for health professionals' competence in virtual consultations: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Louise M W Mathiesen, Bettan Bagger, Ditte Høgsgaard, Martine V Nielsen, Sissel S Gjedsig, Mai-Britt Hägi-Pedersen","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00285","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00285","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to explore, report, and map the evidence on education and training programs for current and future health professionals' competence in virtual consultations.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital solutions, telemedicine, and technologies are increasingly becoming a part of the health system, requiring current and future health professionals to master skills in these domains.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider any studies on education and training programs designed to optimize current and future health professionals' competence in virtual consultations in any setting, such as faculties, universities, university colleges, hospitals, or community locations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be guided by the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished sources of information will be searched for in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), and Scopus. Studies written in English, German, Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian will be considered, with no geographical or cultural limitations. Two independent reviewers will screen retrieved papers, and a standardized tool will be used to extract data from each included source. The results of the extracted data will be presented in tabular format, together with a narrative summary of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/bsmuy.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2618-2624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630651/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sanne T Kristiansen, Cecilie N Lyhne, Mette Kragh, Karen R Sigaard, Poul Videbech, Erik R Larsen, Merete B Bjerrum
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review was to identify and synthesize the best available evidence on how adult patients experience living with depression-related insomnia, and their experiences related to pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Insomnia affects 80% to 90% of patients with depression. The costs of insomnia are considerable for the individual and society alike. To understand the role and consequences of insomnia for an individual with depression and to optimize sleep interventions, an in-depth understanding of patients' experiences is needed. Therefore, this review addresses how adult patients experience living with depression-related insomnia, along with their experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological sleep interventions.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies focusing on adult patients aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of depression who had experiences with insomnia and pharmacological and/or non-pharmacological sleep interventions were included. All studies with qualitative research findings from inpatient and outpatient populations were considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (ProQuest), Cochrane CENTRAL, SveMed+, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses were searched for eligible dissertations and theses. The searches were conducted on May 3-5, 2022, and updated on June 13-19, 2023. Studies published in English, Danish, German, Norwegian, and Swedish were considered. Databases were searched from their inception to the search date. All studies were screened against the inclusion criteria, and critically and independently appraised by 2 reviewers for methodological quality. Findings were pooled using meta-aggregation, and a ConQual Summary of Findings was created.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten qualitative studies were included. The studies were conducted in 6 countries and counted a total of 176 participants. In all, 127 findings were extracted and aggregated into 11 categories. From the 11 categories, 3 synthesized findings were developed: i) Disruption of sleep challenges coping with everyday life by depleting both physical and mental resources; ii) Sleep is an escape and a protective factor against suicide; and iii) Choices, support, and personalized interventions from non-pharmacological approaches addressing depression-related insomnia are valued.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underlined the relationship between depression-related insomnia, its profound impact on individuals' lives, and the value of non-pharmacological sleep interventions to address these issues. Specifically, the review revealed the physical and emotional consequences of insomnia while emphasizing how wakefulness during night hours may exacerbate feeling
{"title":"Experiences of adult patients living with depression-related insomnia: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Sanne T Kristiansen, Cecilie N Lyhne, Mette Kragh, Karen R Sigaard, Poul Videbech, Erik R Larsen, Merete B Bjerrum","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00499","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review was to identify and synthesize the best available evidence on how adult patients experience living with depression-related insomnia, and their experiences related to pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Insomnia affects 80% to 90% of patients with depression. The costs of insomnia are considerable for the individual and society alike. To understand the role and consequences of insomnia for an individual with depression and to optimize sleep interventions, an in-depth understanding of patients' experiences is needed. Therefore, this review addresses how adult patients experience living with depression-related insomnia, along with their experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological sleep interventions.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies focusing on adult patients aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of depression who had experiences with insomnia and pharmacological and/or non-pharmacological sleep interventions were included. All studies with qualitative research findings from inpatient and outpatient populations were considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (ProQuest), Cochrane CENTRAL, SveMed+, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses were searched for eligible dissertations and theses. The searches were conducted on May 3-5, 2022, and updated on June 13-19, 2023. Studies published in English, Danish, German, Norwegian, and Swedish were considered. Databases were searched from their inception to the search date. All studies were screened against the inclusion criteria, and critically and independently appraised by 2 reviewers for methodological quality. Findings were pooled using meta-aggregation, and a ConQual Summary of Findings was created.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten qualitative studies were included. The studies were conducted in 6 countries and counted a total of 176 participants. In all, 127 findings were extracted and aggregated into 11 categories. From the 11 categories, 3 synthesized findings were developed: i) Disruption of sleep challenges coping with everyday life by depleting both physical and mental resources; ii) Sleep is an escape and a protective factor against suicide; and iii) Choices, support, and personalized interventions from non-pharmacological approaches addressing depression-related insomnia are valued.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underlined the relationship between depression-related insomnia, its profound impact on individuals' lives, and the value of non-pharmacological sleep interventions to address these issues. Specifically, the review revealed the physical and emotional consequences of insomnia while emphasizing how wakefulness during night hours may exacerbate feeling","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2447-2517"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paramita Bhattacharya, Sajda Khatoon, Suraya Roy, Nirmalya Mukherjee, Amit Yadav, Pranay Lal, Subhash Pokhrel, Denny John
Objective: The objective of this systematic review will be to estimate the return on investment (ROI) and social return on investment (SROI) on tobacco control measures.
Introduction: Tobacco consumption has been proven to be associated with a huge epidemiological, humanistic, and economic burden. National and international organizations are making concerted efforts to control tobacco use. However, currently, there are no conclusive estimates of the ROI and SROI of such programs and policies.
Inclusion criteria: This review will include all studies that evaluate the ROI or SROI on tobacco control programs and policies on tobacco users and probable tobacco users globally.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of economic evidence. Databases to be searched will include Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Health Economic Evaluation Database (HEED), National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), CEA Registry, LILACS, Science Direct, Web of Science, EconLit, and Google Advanced Search. Gray literature will also be searched for in non-academic databases, including the websites of various civil societies and non-governmental organizations involved in tobacco control. Two independent reviewers will screen titles/abstracts, and later full-text studies. Critical appraisal will be conducted using the JBI checklist for economic evaluations and the SROI Quality Framework. Data will be extracted and synthesized using JBI data extraction forms and synthesis tools. The MPOWER framework will be considered for data synthesis across all selected studies using narrative synthesis, tables, and figures.
{"title":"Return on investment of tobacco control measures: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Paramita Bhattacharya, Sajda Khatoon, Suraya Roy, Nirmalya Mukherjee, Amit Yadav, Pranay Lal, Subhash Pokhrel, Denny John","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00371","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review will be to estimate the return on investment (ROI) and social return on investment (SROI) on tobacco control measures.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco consumption has been proven to be associated with a huge epidemiological, humanistic, and economic burden. National and international organizations are making concerted efforts to control tobacco use. However, currently, there are no conclusive estimates of the ROI and SROI of such programs and policies.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include all studies that evaluate the ROI or SROI on tobacco control programs and policies on tobacco users and probable tobacco users globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of economic evidence. Databases to be searched will include Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Health Economic Evaluation Database (HEED), National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), CEA Registry, LILACS, Science Direct, Web of Science, EconLit, and Google Advanced Search. Gray literature will also be searched for in non-academic databases, including the websites of various civil societies and non-governmental organizations involved in tobacco control. Two independent reviewers will screen titles/abstracts, and later full-text studies. Critical appraisal will be conducted using the JBI checklist for economic evaluations and the SROI Quality Framework. Data will be extracted and synthesized using JBI data extraction forms and synthesis tools. The MPOWER framework will be considered for data synthesis across all selected studies using narrative synthesis, tables, and figures.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023391591.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2601-2610"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Erika Sprake, Janice Kung, Michelle Graham, Ross Tsuyuki, William Gibson
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to understand the current body of knowledge regarding deprescribing in adults aged 60 years or older in acute care settings, including the deprescribing activities that are being undertaken, and the feasibility, challenges, and outcomes of the practice.
Introduction: Polypharmacy is prevalent amongst older adults, despite risks to patients. Much of the existing research on deprescribing has occurred in the outpatient context, with recent research emerging on the unique opportunity that acute care may provide.
Inclusion criteria: This review will include deprescribing in adults aged 60 years or older in acute care. It will consider deprescribing occurring during inpatient admission and at the time of discharge from hospital.
Methods: The JBI method for scoping reviews will guide this review. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews will be undertaken from inception to present with no language restrictions. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies, clinical practice guidelines, and opinion papers will be considered for inclusion. Systematic reviews and scoping reviews will be excluded. Google Scholar and a general Google search will be conducted for gray literature. Two reviewers will assess articles for inclusion and any disagreements will be discussed and resolved by discussion or a third reviewer, if required. Findings will be presented in the scoping review using a narrative approach with supporting quantitative data in a tabular format according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR).
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/pb7aw/.
目的本范围综述旨在了解当前有关急症护理环境中 60 岁及以上成年人去处方化的知识体系，包括正在开展的去处方化活动，以及该做法的可行性、挑战和结果：导言：尽管对患者存在风险，但在老年人中使用多种药物的情况十分普遍。有关去处方化的现有研究大多发生在门诊环境中，而最近的研究则是针对急症护理可能提供的独特机会：本综述将包括急症护理中 60 岁及以上成人的去处方治疗。纳入标准：本综述将包括接受急症护理的 60 岁及以上成年人的去处方化情况，并将考虑住院期间和出院时发生的去处方化情况：方法：采用 JBI 方法进行范围界定审查。方法：本综述将以 JBI 的范围综述方法为指导，检索 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Embase (Ovid) 和 Cochrane 数据库，检索时间从开始到现在，无语言限制。定性、定量和混合方法研究、临床实践指南和意见书都将考虑纳入。系统综述和范围界定综述将被排除在外。将通过 Google Scholar 和普通 Google 搜索灰色文献。两位审稿人将对纳入的文章进行评估，如有任何分歧，将通过讨论或第三位审稿人（如需要）来解决。研究结果将按照《系统综述和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目》（Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews）清单（PRISMA-ScR），以叙述的方式在范围界定综述中呈现，并以表格的形式提供支持性定量数据：开放科学框架 https://osf.io/pb7aw/。
{"title":"Deprescribing for older adults during acute care admission: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Erika Sprake, Janice Kung, Michelle Graham, Ross Tsuyuki, William Gibson","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00406","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00406","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to understand the current body of knowledge regarding deprescribing in adults aged 60 years or older in acute care settings, including the deprescribing activities that are being undertaken, and the feasibility, challenges, and outcomes of the practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Polypharmacy is prevalent amongst older adults, despite risks to patients. Much of the existing research on deprescribing has occurred in the outpatient context, with recent research emerging on the unique opportunity that acute care may provide.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include deprescribing in adults aged 60 years or older in acute care. It will consider deprescribing occurring during inpatient admission and at the time of discharge from hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI method for scoping reviews will guide this review. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews will be undertaken from inception to present with no language restrictions. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies, clinical practice guidelines, and opinion papers will be considered for inclusion. Systematic reviews and scoping reviews will be excluded. Google Scholar and a general Google search will be conducted for gray literature. Two reviewers will assess articles for inclusion and any disagreements will be discussed and resolved by discussion or a third reviewer, if required. Findings will be presented in the scoping review using a narrative approach with supporting quantitative data in a tabular format according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR).</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/pb7aw/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"2585-2592"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630656/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141617299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号