Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00207
Brendan V Schultz, Timothy H Barker, Emma Bosley, Zachary Munn
Objective: This scoping review will aim to determine the methodological rigor and quality of out-of-hospital clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) by collating and describing all literature that assessed these documents using a structured appraisal instrument.
Introduction: In the out-of-hospital setting, the provision of emergency health care by paramedics and first responders is guided, directed, or informed by localized, overarching CPGs. Numerous CPGs in this setting have been assessed for their methodological rigor and overall quality using an appraisal instrument. However, a summation of the overall standard of guidelines within this space has yet to be described.
Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider all primary and secondary peer-reviewed research that has used a structured appraisal instrument to assess the overall quality of CPGs designed specifically for the out-of-hospital setting. Studies that have assessed CPGs designed for in-hospital environments, such as emergency departments, critical care units, or surgical wards, will be excluded.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The following databases and/or information sources will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and ProQuest Central (ProQuest). No publication or language limits will be applied. Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by 2 reviewers, with any disagreements resolved by discussion or with the involvement of an independent third reviewer. In instances where crucial data cannot be extracted, the corresponding author of the article will be contacted. Data will be analyzed using basic descriptive techniques and will be presented in both tabular and diagrammatic formats, accompanied by a narrative description.
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/qvrhw.
目的：本范围综述旨在通过整理和描述所有使用结构化评估工具评估这些文件的文献，确定院外临床实践指南（CPGs）方法学的严谨性和质量。简介：在院外环境中，由护理人员和急救人员提供的紧急卫生保健是由局部的、总体的CPGs指导、指导或通知的。在这种情况下，已经使用评估工具评估了许多CPGs的方法严谨性和整体质量。然而，在这一领域的总体准则标准的总结还有待描述。纳入标准：本范围审查将考虑所有使用结构化评估工具评估专门为院外环境设计的CPGs整体质量的初级和二级同行评议研究。对医院内环境（如急诊科、重症监护病房或外科病房）设计的cpg进行评估的研究将被排除在外。方法：本综述将遵循JBI方法进行范围综述。将检索以下数据库和/或信息源：MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost)， Scopus和ProQuest Central （ProQuest）。没有出版物或语言限制。研究选择和数据提取将由2名审稿人独立完成，任何分歧通过讨论解决或由独立的第三方审稿人参与。在无法提取关键数据的情况下，将联系文章的通讯作者。数据将使用基本的描述技术进行分析，并将以表格和图表两种格式提出，并附有叙述性说明。评审注册：Open Science Framework https://osf.io/qvrhw。
{"title":"Determining the methodological rigor and overall quality of out-of-hospital clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Brendan V Schultz, Timothy H Barker, Emma Bosley, Zachary Munn","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00207","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00207","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review will aim to determine the methodological rigor and quality of out-of-hospital clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) by collating and describing all literature that assessed these documents using a structured appraisal instrument.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the out-of-hospital setting, the provision of emergency health care by paramedics and first responders is guided, directed, or informed by localized, overarching CPGs. Numerous CPGs in this setting have been assessed for their methodological rigor and overall quality using an appraisal instrument. However, a summation of the overall standard of guidelines within this space has yet to be described.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This scoping review will consider all primary and secondary peer-reviewed research that has used a structured appraisal instrument to assess the overall quality of CPGs designed specifically for the out-of-hospital setting. Studies that have assessed CPGs designed for in-hospital environments, such as emergency departments, critical care units, or surgical wards, will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The following databases and/or information sources will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and ProQuest Central (ProQuest). No publication or language limits will be applied. Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by 2 reviewers, with any disagreements resolved by discussion or with the involvement of an independent third reviewer. In instances where crucial data cannot be extracted, the corresponding author of the article will be contacted. Data will be analyzed using basic descriptive techniques and will be presented in both tabular and diagrammatic formats, accompanied by a narrative description.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/qvrhw.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 1","pages":"173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00447
Paloma Sodré Cardoso, Bruno Mori, Ronilson Ferreira Freitas, Regismeire Viana Lima, Bruno Mendes Tavares, Jose Fernando Marques Barcellos, Carla Vanessa Alves Lopes, Celsa da Silva Moura Souza
Objective: This review will analyze the effectiveness of early childhood education interventions to improve complementary feeding practices in children aged 4 to 36 months.
Introduction: Healthy eating habits, which start with food introduction, can influence children's growth and development. Educational actions carried out at school for children who are beginning to eat, involving families and school staff who attend daycare centers, can serve as strategies to improve complementary feeding practices.
Inclusion criteria: The review will consider randomized clinical trials, cluster-randomized clinical trials, and controlled clinical trials that evaluate the effectiveness of early childhood education interventions involving children aged 4 to 36 months, their families, or school staff to improve complementary feeding. In their absence, observational cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies may be considered.
Methods: This review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The search for relevant studies will be conducted in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), BIREME, Scopus, the Cochrane Library (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and the ProQuest Databases (ProQuest Central). No date or language limitations will be applied. Two independent reviewers will select studies by screening titles, abstracts, and keywords against the inclusion criteria. This will be followed by full-text screening. Two independent reviewers will then evaluate the quality of the sources and perform data extraction. GRADEpro will be used to assess the certainty in the findings, which will be reported in the systematic review and, if possible, grouped in a meta-analysis.
{"title":"Effectiveness of early childhood education interventions to improve complementary feeding practices in children 4 to 36 months of age: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Paloma Sodré Cardoso, Bruno Mori, Ronilson Ferreira Freitas, Regismeire Viana Lima, Bruno Mendes Tavares, Jose Fernando Marques Barcellos, Carla Vanessa Alves Lopes, Celsa da Silva Moura Souza","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00447","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00447","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will analyze the effectiveness of early childhood education interventions to improve complementary feeding practices in children aged 4 to 36 months.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthy eating habits, which start with food introduction, can influence children's growth and development. Educational actions carried out at school for children who are beginning to eat, involving families and school staff who attend daycare centers, can serve as strategies to improve complementary feeding practices.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will consider randomized clinical trials, cluster-randomized clinical trials, and controlled clinical trials that evaluate the effectiveness of early childhood education interventions involving children aged 4 to 36 months, their families, or school staff to improve complementary feeding. In their absence, observational cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies may be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The search for relevant studies will be conducted in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), BIREME, Scopus, the Cochrane Library (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and the ProQuest Databases (ProQuest Central). No date or language limitations will be applied. Two independent reviewers will select studies by screening titles, abstracts, and keywords against the inclusion criteria. This will be followed by full-text screening. Two independent reviewers will then evaluate the quality of the sources and perform data extraction. GRADEpro will be used to assess the certainty in the findings, which will be reported in the systematic review and, if possible, grouped in a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022384704.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"165-172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142393990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00332
Joanne Smith-Young, April Pike, Michelle Swab, Roger Chafe
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this review were to comprehensively identify the best available qualitative evidence on parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnostic services for their children, and to develop recommendations based on the review for addressing barriers to timely diagnosis and early intervention.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early identification of ASD is a priority because the best chance for improving symptoms occurs through early and intensive intervention. A definitive ASD diagnosis is often a prerequisite for children to access publicly funded services, yet obtaining a diagnosis in itself can be stressful, frustrating, and time-consuming for many families. It is essential to understand the barriers and facilitators parents and guardians face in accessing ASD diagnostic services for their children.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This qualitative systematic review considered studies conducted worldwide that included parents and guardians of children up to 18 years of age who had accessed or who were attempting to access ASD diagnostic services for their children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A literature search included CINAHL (EBSCOhost), CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Social Services Abstracts (ProQuest), ERIC (EBSCOhost), and Embase. Gray literature sources included ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar, Google, OpenGrey, other online resources (government and organizational websites), and reference lists of retrieved records. No language, date, or country limits were applied to the searches. Retrieved records from the academic databases, gray literature, and reference lists of retrieved records were screened, with potentially relevant records examined in full against the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies were critically appraised for methodological quality, and those included in this review were subjected to data extraction of descriptive details and study findings relevant to the review question. Study findings were synthesized and assigned confidence scores. All reviewers agreed upon the categories and finalized synthesized findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 36 included studies varied in qualitative research designs and were assessed as having high methodological quality. There were 661 eligible participants, and 55 credible and unequivocal research findings were extracted. The research findings yielded 6 categories and 3 synthesized findings with moderate confidence scores. Parents' and guardians' ability to access ASD diagnostic services for their children is affected by i) encountering health care providers who actively listened to and addressed parents' and guardians' concerns instead of dismissing them, providing a sense of supp
{"title":"Parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Joanne Smith-Young, April Pike, Michelle Swab, Roger Chafe","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00332","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives of this review were to comprehensively identify the best available qualitative evidence on parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnostic services for their children, and to develop recommendations based on the review for addressing barriers to timely diagnosis and early intervention.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early identification of ASD is a priority because the best chance for improving symptoms occurs through early and intensive intervention. A definitive ASD diagnosis is often a prerequisite for children to access publicly funded services, yet obtaining a diagnosis in itself can be stressful, frustrating, and time-consuming for many families. It is essential to understand the barriers and facilitators parents and guardians face in accessing ASD diagnostic services for their children.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This qualitative systematic review considered studies conducted worldwide that included parents and guardians of children up to 18 years of age who had accessed or who were attempting to access ASD diagnostic services for their children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A literature search included CINAHL (EBSCOhost), CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Social Services Abstracts (ProQuest), ERIC (EBSCOhost), and Embase. Gray literature sources included ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar, Google, OpenGrey, other online resources (government and organizational websites), and reference lists of retrieved records. No language, date, or country limits were applied to the searches. Retrieved records from the academic databases, gray literature, and reference lists of retrieved records were screened, with potentially relevant records examined in full against the inclusion criteria. Eligible studies were critically appraised for methodological quality, and those included in this review were subjected to data extraction of descriptive details and study findings relevant to the review question. Study findings were synthesized and assigned confidence scores. All reviewers agreed upon the categories and finalized synthesized findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 36 included studies varied in qualitative research designs and were assessed as having high methodological quality. There were 661 eligible participants, and 55 credible and unequivocal research findings were extracted. The research findings yielded 6 categories and 3 synthesized findings with moderate confidence scores. Parents' and guardians' ability to access ASD diagnostic services for their children is affected by i) encountering health care providers who actively listened to and addressed parents' and guardians' concerns instead of dismissing them, providing a sense of supp","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"6-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142548085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00221
Kieko Iida, Mina Ishimaru, Mayuko Tsujimura, Ayumi Wakasugi
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review was to examine community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of health care professionals initiating advance care planning for patients has been reported; however, because of the shift from institutionalized to community care, community-dwelling older people have fewer opportunities to discuss these plans with health care professionals compared with older people living in other settings. The timely initiation of advance care planning and sustainable discussions among older people, their families, and community health care professionals is necessary and may improve palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies with participants aged 60 years and older who have experience with advance care planning and live in their own homes in the community were included. We considered qualitative studies and the qualitative component of mixed methods studies published between January 1999 and April 2023 in English or Japanese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), JSTOR, Scopus, Japan Medical Abstract Society, and CiNii were searched for published papers. Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global and MedNar were searched for unpublished papers and gray literature. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis were conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI approach and JBI standardized tools. Findings were pooled using a meta-aggregation approach. The synthesized findings were graded using the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research syntheses and presented in a Summary of Findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in the review. Each study scored between 6 and 8 out of 10 on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. We extracted 28 findings and aggregated them into 7 categories, generating 3 synthesized findings: i) A trusting relationship with health care professionals is essential for older people's decision-making. Health care professionals' attitudes, knowledge, and skills play a role in this, influencing the perceived quality of care; ii) Shared decision-making and patient-centered communication are essential. Older people feel ambiguity toward end-of-life decision and advance care planning, and they want their wishes to be heard in any situation to maintain their autonomy and quality of life; iii) Older people need the appropriate forms and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Qualitative studies on community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals are scarce. The experiences have illustrated that trusting re
目的：本综述的目的是研究社区居住的老年人与卫生保健专业人员进行预先护理计划的经验。导言：卫生保健专业人员为患者启动预先护理计划的重要性已被报道；然而，由于从机构护理转向社区护理，与生活在其他环境中的老年人相比，居住在社区的老年人与卫生保健专业人员讨论这些计划的机会较少。及时启动预先护理计划，并在老年人、他们的家庭和社区卫生保健专业人员之间进行可持续的讨论是必要的，这可能会改善姑息治疗和临终关怀。纳入标准：纳入年龄在60岁及以上、有预先护理计划经验且住在社区自己家中的研究对象。我们考虑了1999年1月至2023年4月间以英语或日语发表的定性研究和混合方法研究的定性成分。方法：检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、JSTORE、Scopus、Japan Medical Abstract Society、CiNii等已发表论文，检索谷歌Scholar、ProQuest Dissertations和Theses Global、MedNar等未发表论文和灰色文献。研究选择、批判性评价、数据提取和数据合成由2名独立审稿人使用JBI方法和JBI标准化工具进行。研究结果采用meta-aggregation方法汇总。综合研究结果使用征服方法进行分级，以建立对定性研究综合结果的信心，并在研究结果摘要中提出。结果：2017年至2022年间发表的5项研究被纳入综述。在JBI定性研究的关键评估清单上，每个研究的总分在6到8分之间。我们提取了28项研究结果，并将其汇总为7类，得出了3项综合发现：1)与卫生专业人员的信任关系对老年人的决策至关重要。卫生专业人员的态度、知识和技能在这方面发挥作用，影响人们对护理质量的感知；共同决策和以患者为中心的沟通至关重要。老年人对临终决定和提前护理计划感到模棱两可，他们希望在任何情况下都能听到他们的愿望，以保持他们的自主权和生活质量；（三）老年人需要适当的形式和可获得和协调的护理，以便开始预先护理规划。结论：关于社区居住老年人与卫生保健专业人员进行预先护理计划的经验的定性研究很少。这些经验表明，信任关系影响人们对他们所接受的护理质量的看法；他们的未来充满不确定性；他们对即将到来的死亡有不同的感受或态度，包括否认和回避。该审查强调需要适当的形式，可获得和协调的护理，以开始预先护理规划；因此，应仔细选择符合个人健康和社会心理状况的方法。建议进行进一步的研究，以包括来自更广泛地理和文化背景的老年人，并评估和评价不同的预先护理规划方法及其在健康和社会心理状况不同的社区居住老年人群体中的执行过程。评审注册号：PROSPERO CRD42020122803。
{"title":"Community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Kieko Iida, Mina Ishimaru, Mayuko Tsujimura, Ayumi Wakasugi","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00221","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00221","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review was to examine community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of health care professionals initiating advance care planning for patients has been reported; however, because of the shift from institutionalized to community care, community-dwelling older people have fewer opportunities to discuss these plans with health care professionals compared with older people living in other settings. The timely initiation of advance care planning and sustainable discussions among older people, their families, and community health care professionals is necessary and may improve palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies with participants aged 60 years and older who have experience with advance care planning and live in their own homes in the community were included. We considered qualitative studies and the qualitative component of mixed methods studies published between January 1999 and April 2023 in English or Japanese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), JSTOR, Scopus, Japan Medical Abstract Society, and CiNii were searched for published papers. Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global and MedNar were searched for unpublished papers and gray literature. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis were conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI approach and JBI standardized tools. Findings were pooled using a meta-aggregation approach. The synthesized findings were graded using the ConQual approach for establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research syntheses and presented in a Summary of Findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in the review. Each study scored between 6 and 8 out of 10 on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. We extracted 28 findings and aggregated them into 7 categories, generating 3 synthesized findings: i) A trusting relationship with health care professionals is essential for older people's decision-making. Health care professionals' attitudes, knowledge, and skills play a role in this, influencing the perceived quality of care; ii) Shared decision-making and patient-centered communication are essential. Older people feel ambiguity toward end-of-life decision and advance care planning, and they want their wishes to be heard in any situation to maintain their autonomy and quality of life; iii) Older people need the appropriate forms and accessible and coordinated care to begin advance care planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Qualitative studies on community-dwelling older people's experiences of advance care planning with health care professionals are scarce. The experiences have illustrated that trusting re","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"69-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142773132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00183
Laura Ingham, Alison Cooper, Deborah Edwards, Catherine Purcell
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to map how occupational therapists evaluate the outcomes of services they provide within primary care. This evidence was considered in relation to how identified outcome evaluation methods align to principles of value-based health care.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary care services are experiencing unprecedented demands. Occupational therapy is an allied health profession that supports health and care provision in primary care, using a timely and proactive approach. There has been a notable increase in occupational therapy roles across primary care services in the past decade; however, the mechanisms for evaluating outcomes and the wider impact of these services remain under-researched. The aim of value-based health care, a global transformative approach, is to establish better health outcomes for individuals and communities through addressing value in system-wide care. However, it is not yet clear how evaluation methods used within occupational therapy align to the principles of a value-based agenda.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Peer-reviewed journal articles and gray literature written in English were included to identify outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of occupational therapy services provided in a primary care setting. Outcome evaluation methods used exclusively for the purpose of conducting research and not for capturing data within an occupational therapy primary care setting as part of routine clinical practice were excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The literature search was undertaken during June and July 2022. The following databases were searched from their earliest dates of availability: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, Scopus, AMED, and Web of Science Core Collection. Two reviewers extracted data, supported by an extraction form developed by the reviewers. Findings were mapped using a framework developed based on key principles of value-based health care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2394 articles, 16 eligible studies were included in the review. Of these, 9 were quantitative and 7 were of mixed methods design. Studies were from the UK, USA, Sweden, Spain, and Canada. The occupational therapy services represented were mainly heterogeneous. Four services were part of multidisciplinary programs of care and 12 services were specific to occupational therapy. Identified outcome evaluation methods broadly aligned to principles of value-based health care, with most alignment noted for measures demonstrating the aim of establishing better health. A wide range of evaluation methods were described to address both individual-level and service-level outcomes, with the use of patient-reported outcome measures identified in 13 studies. To capture patient experience, most studies report
{"title":"Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review.","authors":"Laura Ingham, Alison Cooper, Deborah Edwards, Catherine Purcell","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00183","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to map how occupational therapists evaluate the outcomes of services they provide within primary care. This evidence was considered in relation to how identified outcome evaluation methods align to principles of value-based health care.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary care services are experiencing unprecedented demands. Occupational therapy is an allied health profession that supports health and care provision in primary care, using a timely and proactive approach. There has been a notable increase in occupational therapy roles across primary care services in the past decade; however, the mechanisms for evaluating outcomes and the wider impact of these services remain under-researched. The aim of value-based health care, a global transformative approach, is to establish better health outcomes for individuals and communities through addressing value in system-wide care. However, it is not yet clear how evaluation methods used within occupational therapy align to the principles of a value-based agenda.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Peer-reviewed journal articles and gray literature written in English were included to identify outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of occupational therapy services provided in a primary care setting. Outcome evaluation methods used exclusively for the purpose of conducting research and not for capturing data within an occupational therapy primary care setting as part of routine clinical practice were excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The literature search was undertaken during June and July 2022. The following databases were searched from their earliest dates of availability: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, Scopus, AMED, and Web of Science Core Collection. Two reviewers extracted data, supported by an extraction form developed by the reviewers. Findings were mapped using a framework developed based on key principles of value-based health care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2394 articles, 16 eligible studies were included in the review. Of these, 9 were quantitative and 7 were of mixed methods design. Studies were from the UK, USA, Sweden, Spain, and Canada. The occupational therapy services represented were mainly heterogeneous. Four services were part of multidisciplinary programs of care and 12 services were specific to occupational therapy. Identified outcome evaluation methods broadly aligned to principles of value-based health care, with most alignment noted for measures demonstrating the aim of establishing better health. A wide range of evaluation methods were described to address both individual-level and service-level outcomes, with the use of patient-reported outcome measures identified in 13 studies. To capture patient experience, most studies report","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"108-142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142591772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00512
Joanne Smith-Young, Roger Chafe
{"title":"Waiting and the unknown: parental experiences accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children.","authors":"Joanne Smith-Young, Roger Chafe","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00512","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00512","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 1","pages":"4-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142956319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00144
Farah Yoosoof, Fathima Rizka Ihsan, Steven Agius, Neil Coulson, Kate Freeman, Nicola Cooper
Objective: The objective of this review will be to explore the paradigmatic perspectives of research on self-regulated learning in non-Western learners in health professions education.
Introduction: Studies show that there are significant cultural differences in self-regulated learning. However, a predominantly positivistic research paradigm, attempting to fit cross-cultural populations into pre-defined Western conceptualizations of self-regulated learning, has led to the disregard of these differences. Viewed from a critical realist paradigm, emerging evidence suggests the need for generalizable, yet culturally sensitive models. Given the relevance of self-regulated learning to success in an increasingly diverse health professions setting, the first step toward achieving this is to gain a systematic understanding of the paradigms of research on self-regulated learning in non-Western learners in this context.
Inclusion criteria: Primary research on the self-regulated learning of non-Western learners in health professions education will be included. Participants will include learners in the Global South, including learners from Japan and South Korea, based on study setting. Studies on self-regulation and self-directed learning will not be included.
Methods: This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ASSIA (ProQuest), PsycINFO (Ovid), ERIC (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, CKNI, Epistemonikos, and LILACS. Gray literature will be searched for in Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and DART-Europe. There will be no date or language restrictions. Following independent title and abstract screening by 2 reviewers, data will be extracted into a piloted data extraction tool, which will be iteratively revised as needed. Analyzed data will be presented in graphs and tables, accompanied by a narrative summary.
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/gf2ez.
目的本综述旨在从范式的角度探讨健康专业教育中非西方学习者自我调节学习的研究：研究表明，在自我调节学习方面存在着显著的文化差异。然而，以实证主义为主导的研究范式，试图将跨文化人群纳入预先定义的西方自我调节学习概念中，导致了对这些差异的忽视。从批判现实主义范式的角度来看，新出现的证据表明，我们需要可推广的、但对文化敏感的模式。鉴于自我调节学习与在日益多样化的卫生专业环境中取得成功息息相关，实现这一目标的第一步就是系统地了解在此背景下非西方学习者自我调节学习的研究范式：纳入标准：将纳入有关非西方学习者在卫生专业教育中自我调节学习的初步研究。根据研究环境，参与者将包括全球南部的学习者，包括来自日本和韩国的学习者。有关自我调节和自主学习的研究将不包括在内：本综述将按照 JBI 的范围界定综述方法进行。将检索以下数据库：MEDLINE（Ovid）、CINAHL（EBSCOhost）、ASSIA、PsycINFO（Ovid）、ERIC（EBSCOhost）、Web of Science Core Collection、CKNI、Epistemonikos 和 LILACS。灰色文献将在 Google Scholar、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses 和 DART-Europe 中检索。没有日期或语言限制。在两名审稿人对标题和摘要进行独立筛选后，数据将被提取到一个试用的数据提取工具中，并根据需要对该工具进行反复修改。分析后的数据将以图表形式呈现，并附有叙述性摘要。审查项目的详细信息请访问开放科学框架：https://osf.io/gf2ez。
{"title":"Paradigmatic perspectives of research on the self-regulated learning of non-Western learners in health professions education: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Farah Yoosoof, Fathima Rizka Ihsan, Steven Agius, Neil Coulson, Kate Freeman, Nicola Cooper","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00144","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review will be to explore the paradigmatic perspectives of research on self-regulated learning in non-Western learners in health professions education.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies show that there are significant cultural differences in self-regulated learning. However, a predominantly positivistic research paradigm, attempting to fit cross-cultural populations into pre-defined Western conceptualizations of self-regulated learning, has led to the disregard of these differences. Viewed from a critical realist paradigm, emerging evidence suggests the need for generalizable, yet culturally sensitive models. Given the relevance of self-regulated learning to success in an increasingly diverse health professions setting, the first step toward achieving this is to gain a systematic understanding of the paradigms of research on self-regulated learning in non-Western learners in this context.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Primary research on the self-regulated learning of non-Western learners in health professions education will be included. Participants will include learners in the Global South, including learners from Japan and South Korea, based on study setting. Studies on self-regulation and self-directed learning will not be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ASSIA (ProQuest), PsycINFO (Ovid), ERIC (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, CKNI, Epistemonikos, and LILACS. Gray literature will be searched for in Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and DART-Europe. There will be no date or language restrictions. Following independent title and abstract screening by 2 reviewers, data will be extracted into a piloted data extraction tool, which will be iteratively revised as needed. Analyzed data will be presented in graphs and tables, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/gf2ez.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"197-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142355747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00066
Kayley Perfetto, Laura Pozzobon, Kim Sears, Jane O'Hara, Amanda Ross-White, Lenora Duhn
Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to understand the experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety at the direct care level from the perspective of care partners, patients, and health care professionals.
Introduction: Care partner engagement is a strategy for promoting patient safety in hospitals at the direct care level (ie, at the point where patient care is delivered). When present, care partners can increase safety by watching, listening, and taking action to protect admitted patients. To improve care partner presence policies and safety engagement strategies within hospitals, a comprehensive understanding of the current qualitative evidence about the breadth of experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety is required.
Inclusion criteria: This review will include qualitative studies that consider the experiences of care partners, adult patients, and health care professionals. The engagement of care partners in patient safety within pediatric hospital settings will not be considered.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A preliminary literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and a full search strategy was developed for MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (all via Ovid), as well as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI Evidence Synthesis . The JBI approach to study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, data synthesis, and assessment of confidence will be followed. Two reviewers will test the screening criteria and data extraction protocol.
{"title":"Care partner engagement in patient safety at the direct care level in hospital: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Kayley Perfetto, Laura Pozzobon, Kim Sears, Jane O'Hara, Amanda Ross-White, Lenora Duhn","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00066","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to understand the experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety at the direct care level from the perspective of care partners, patients, and health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Care partner engagement is a strategy for promoting patient safety in hospitals at the direct care level (ie, at the point where patient care is delivered). When present, care partners can increase safety by watching, listening, and taking action to protect admitted patients. To improve care partner presence policies and safety engagement strategies within hospitals, a comprehensive understanding of the current qualitative evidence about the breadth of experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety is required.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include qualitative studies that consider the experiences of care partners, adult patients, and health care professionals. The engagement of care partners in patient safety within pediatric hospital settings will not be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A preliminary literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and a full search strategy was developed for MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (all via Ovid), as well as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI Evidence Synthesis . The JBI approach to study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, data synthesis, and assessment of confidence will be followed. Two reviewers will test the screening criteria and data extraction protocol.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023476286.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"150-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00133
Alice Terrett, Magalie Van Loo, Krishnaswamy Sundararajan, David Brealey, Mervyn Singer, Jessica Manson, Eamon Patrick Raith
Objective: The objective of this review is to identify immunological pathways and markers of severity of illness associated with clinical outcomes that may represent potential therapeutic targets in the management of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.
Introduction: A broad range of immunomodulatory therapies is used to manage hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, however, the supporting evidence for these therapies is scarce. Identifying patients likely to experience more severe disease or die is currently extremely difficult, if not impossible. The identification of implicated cytokines in secondary disease can provide further support for the identification of high-risk patients and the development of targeted therapies.
Inclusion criteria: Studies reporting immune biomarker and cytokine measurement in adult patients (age ≥18 years) with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis will be considered for inclusion.
Methods: The proposed review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) will be searched, without date limitations. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers. Relevant sources will be retrieved, and their citation details imported into the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information.
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9524e.
{"title":"Immune biomarkers and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Alice Terrett, Magalie Van Loo, Krishnaswamy Sundararajan, David Brealey, Mervyn Singer, Jessica Manson, Eamon Patrick Raith","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00133","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00133","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to identify immunological pathways and markers of severity of illness associated with clinical outcomes that may represent potential therapeutic targets in the management of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A broad range of immunomodulatory therapies is used to manage hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, however, the supporting evidence for these therapies is scarce. Identifying patients likely to experience more severe disease or die is currently extremely difficult, if not impossible. The identification of implicated cytokines in secondary disease can provide further support for the identification of high-risk patients and the development of targeted therapies.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies reporting immune biomarker and cytokine measurement in adult patients (age ≥18 years) with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis will be considered for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) will be searched, without date limitations. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers. Relevant sources will be retrieved, and their citation details imported into the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9524e.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"158-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00534
Mulugeta Bayisa Chala, Jacobi Elliott, G Ross Baker, David M Walton, Micheline Steele, Siobhan Schabrun
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to describe the current evidence exploring integrated care for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.
Introduction: The integrated model of care is an emerging approach to delivering person-centered care. Integrated care supports the management of people with major chronic health conditions; however, the evidence behind its use to support people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders is scant. This scoping review will synthesize how integrated care is conceptualized, delivered, and evaluated for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. The review will also synthesize the attributes, components, elements, goals, frequently evaluated outcomes, theories/frameworks, and facilitators and barriers to delivering this model among people with musculoskeletal disorders.
Inclusion criteria: Studies conducted on the delivery and/or evaluation of integrated care for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders in any health care setting (eg, primary, secondary, tertiary) and/or geographical location (countries, cultures) will be considered.
Methods: The review will follow the JBI scoping review methodology. Databases such as MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), the JBI EBP Database, PEDRO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and Web of Science, as well as sources of gray literature, will be thoroughly searched. Papers published in all languages will be considered. Two reviewers will independently review the selected articles and extract data using a data extraction tool developed for this scoping review. The analysis will involve numerical and descriptive summaries of the selected articles and will be presented using graphs and tables, in line with Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
目的本范围综述旨在描述目前探索针对慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者的综合护理的证据：综合护理模式是一种新兴的以人为本的护理方式。综合护理支持对患有主要慢性疾病的患者进行管理；然而，将其用于支持慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者的证据却很少。本范围界定综述将对综合护理的概念化、实施以及对慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者的评估进行综述。综述还将综合归纳综合护理的属性、组成部分、要素、目标、经常评估的结果、理论/框架，以及为肌肉骨骼疾病患者提供这种模式的促进因素和障碍：纳入标准：有关在任何医疗环境（如初级、二级、三级）和/或地理位置（国家、文化）为慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者提供和/或评估综合护理的研究均可考虑：综述将遵循 JBI 的范围综述方法。将对 MEDLINE (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Scopus、Embase (Ovid)、PsycINFO (Ovid)、JBI EBP 数据库、PEDRO、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)、Google Scholar 和 Web of Science 等数据库以及灰色文献来源进行全面检索。以所有语言发表的论文都将被考虑。两名审稿人将独立审阅所选文章，并使用为此次范围界定综述开发的数据提取工具提取数据。分析将包括对所选文章的数字和描述性总结，并将根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》（Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews，PRISMA-ScR）使用图表进行展示。
{"title":"Integrated care for adults with chronic musculoskeletal disorders: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Mulugeta Bayisa Chala, Jacobi Elliott, G Ross Baker, David M Walton, Micheline Steele, Siobhan Schabrun","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00534","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00534","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to describe the current evidence exploring integrated care for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The integrated model of care is an emerging approach to delivering person-centered care. Integrated care supports the management of people with major chronic health conditions; however, the evidence behind its use to support people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders is scant. This scoping review will synthesize how integrated care is conceptualized, delivered, and evaluated for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. The review will also synthesize the attributes, components, elements, goals, frequently evaluated outcomes, theories/frameworks, and facilitators and barriers to delivering this model among people with musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies conducted on the delivery and/or evaluation of integrated care for people with chronic musculoskeletal disorders in any health care setting (eg, primary, secondary, tertiary) and/or geographical location (countries, cultures) will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI scoping review methodology. Databases such as MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), the JBI EBP Database, PEDRO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, and Web of Science, as well as sources of gray literature, will be thoroughly searched. Papers published in all languages will be considered. Two reviewers will independently review the selected articles and extract data using a data extraction tool developed for this scoping review. The analysis will involve numerical and descriptive summaries of the selected articles and will be presented using graphs and tables, in line with Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142297427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号