{"title":"Erratum to: Impact of primary and recurrent genital herpes on the quality of life of young people and adults: a mixed methods systematic review.","authors":"","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00218","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00218","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"22 6","pages":"1205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141307023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrea López-Navarrete, Melissa Zimmermann-Vildoso, Vanessa de Brito Poveda, Lilia de Souza Nogueira
Objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of combined virtual and clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies on health students' learning.
Introduction: Current evidence indicates that both virtual simulation and clinical simulation are effective in assisting students to acquire clinical skills. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of the combined use of both teaching strategies, which could enhance health students' learning.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies that address the combined use of virtual simulation with clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies in learning, clinical reasoning, clinical decision-making, and/or clinical competencies of health students. Combining different hybrid simulators to form a new one will not be considered for inclusion in the review.
Methods: The databases to be searched will include Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, LILACS (VHL), Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, ERIC, and gray literature sources. Two independent reviewers will perform the study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction using JBI tools. A narrative synthesis will be performed and, if possible, meta-analysis and risk assessment of publication bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach will be used to assess the certainty of the findings.
{"title":"Effectiveness of combined virtual and clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies on health students' learning: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Andrea López-Navarrete, Melissa Zimmermann-Vildoso, Vanessa de Brito Poveda, Lilia de Souza Nogueira","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00348","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of combined virtual and clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies on health students' learning.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current evidence indicates that both virtual simulation and clinical simulation are effective in assisting students to acquire clinical skills. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of the combined use of both teaching strategies, which could enhance health students' learning.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies that address the combined use of virtual simulation with clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies in learning, clinical reasoning, clinical decision-making, and/or clinical competencies of health students. Combining different hybrid simulators to form a new one will not be considered for inclusion in the review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases to be searched will include Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, LILACS (VHL), Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, ERIC, and gray literature sources. Two independent reviewers will perform the study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction using JBI tools. A narrative synthesis will be performed and, if possible, meta-analysis and risk assessment of publication bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach will be used to assess the certainty of the findings.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023422410.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1170-1176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139098899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This review will investigate the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in adult patients who underwent head and neck surgery.
Introduction: Controlling bleeding is important in head and neck surgery. Complications involving nearby vital structures increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Surgical tissue adhesives are used in addition to other traditional hemostatic methods to reduce surgical site bleeding. Fibrin sealants have shown some success compared with other tissue adhesives, but individual studies have been inconclusive.
Inclusion criteria: We will include studies comparing fibrin sealants with placebo or usual care in patients 18 years or older who have undergone soft tissue surgery of the head and neck with drain placement. Primary outcomes include wound complications and time to surgical drain removal. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, drain volume output, surgical management of postoperative hematoma, rate of blood transfusions, and adverse reactions.
Methods: We will search electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science) for studies published from 1975 onwards. Sources to be search for unpublished literature will include ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MedNar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Titles, abstracts, and full-text papers will be assessed against the inclusion criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Study screening and selection will be performed, and critical appraisal conducted using the standardized JBI appraisal tools. Data will be extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analysis will be conducted for all outcomes where appropriate, with weighted mean differences for continuous data. Risk ratios will be used for dichotomous data. Certainty will be reported using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
{"title":"Effectiveness of fibrin sealants in head and neck surgery: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Marie Nguyen, Andrew Foreman, Craig Lockwood","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00142","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will investigate the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in adult patients who underwent head and neck surgery.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controlling bleeding is important in head and neck surgery. Complications involving nearby vital structures increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Surgical tissue adhesives are used in addition to other traditional hemostatic methods to reduce surgical site bleeding. Fibrin sealants have shown some success compared with other tissue adhesives, but individual studies have been inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>We will include studies comparing fibrin sealants with placebo or usual care in patients 18 years or older who have undergone soft tissue surgery of the head and neck with drain placement. Primary outcomes include wound complications and time to surgical drain removal. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, drain volume output, surgical management of postoperative hematoma, rate of blood transfusions, and adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will search electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science) for studies published from 1975 onwards. Sources to be search for unpublished literature will include ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MedNar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Titles, abstracts, and full-text papers will be assessed against the inclusion criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Study screening and selection will be performed, and critical appraisal conducted using the standardized JBI appraisal tools. Data will be extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analysis will be conducted for all outcomes where appropriate, with weighted mean differences for continuous data. Risk ratios will be used for dichotomous data. Certainty will be reported using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023412820.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1151-1160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138446530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kelly Lackie, Stephen Miller, Marion Brown, Amy Mireault, Melissa Helwig, Lorri Beatty, Leanne Picketts, Peter Stilwell, Shauna Houk
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review was to examine teaching approaches used to teach interprofessional health professional learners how to break bad news collaboratively.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When breaking bad news, health professionals must be equipped to deliver it skillfully and collaboratively; however, the literature shows that this skill receives little attention in program curricula. Consequently, health professionals can feel inadequately prepared to deliver bad news, which may lead to increased burnout, distress, and compassion fatigue.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies that describe teaching approaches used to teach learners how to break bad news collaboratively were considered for inclusion. Studies must have included 2 or more undergraduate and/or postgraduate learners working toward a professional health or social care qualification/degree at a university or college. Studies including lay, complementary and alternative, or non-health/social care learners were excluded. Due to the primary language of the research team, only English articles were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI 3-step process was followed for developing the search. Databases searched included MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, Education Resource Complete (EBSCOhost), and Social Work Abstracts (EBSCOhost). The initial search was conducted on February 11, 2021, and was updated on May 17, 2022. Title and abstract screening and data extraction were completed by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Results are presented in tabular or diagrammatic format, together with a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included in the scoping review, with a range of methodologies and designs (pre/post surveys, qualitative, feasibility, mixed methods, cross-sectional, quality improvement, and methodological triangulation). The majority of papers were from the United States (n=8; 61.5%). All but 1 study used simulation-enhanced interprofessional education as the preferred method to teach interprofessional cohorts of learners how to break bad news. The bulk of simulations were face-to-face (n=11; 84.6%). Three studies (23.1%) were reported as high fidelity, while the remainder did not disclose fidelity. All studies that used simulation to teach students how to break bad news utilized simulated participants/patients to portray patients and/or family in the simulations. The academic level of participants varied, with the majority noted as undergraduate (n=7; 53.8%); 3 studies (23.1%) indicated a mix of undergraduate and graduate participants, 2 (15.4%) were graduate only, and 1 (7.7%) was not disclosed. There was a range of health professional programs represented by participants, with medicine and nursing equally in the majority (n=10; 76.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation-enhanced interp
{"title":"Interprofessional collaboration between health professional learners when breaking bad news: a scoping review of teaching approaches.","authors":"Kelly Lackie, Stephen Miller, Marion Brown, Amy Mireault, Melissa Helwig, Lorri Beatty, Leanne Picketts, Peter Stilwell, Shauna Houk","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-22-00437","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-22-00437","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review was to examine teaching approaches used to teach interprofessional health professional learners how to break bad news collaboratively.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When breaking bad news, health professionals must be equipped to deliver it skillfully and collaboratively; however, the literature shows that this skill receives little attention in program curricula. Consequently, health professionals can feel inadequately prepared to deliver bad news, which may lead to increased burnout, distress, and compassion fatigue.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies that describe teaching approaches used to teach learners how to break bad news collaboratively were considered for inclusion. Studies must have included 2 or more undergraduate and/or postgraduate learners working toward a professional health or social care qualification/degree at a university or college. Studies including lay, complementary and alternative, or non-health/social care learners were excluded. Due to the primary language of the research team, only English articles were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI 3-step process was followed for developing the search. Databases searched included MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, Education Resource Complete (EBSCOhost), and Social Work Abstracts (EBSCOhost). The initial search was conducted on February 11, 2021, and was updated on May 17, 2022. Title and abstract screening and data extraction were completed by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Results are presented in tabular or diagrammatic format, together with a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included in the scoping review, with a range of methodologies and designs (pre/post surveys, qualitative, feasibility, mixed methods, cross-sectional, quality improvement, and methodological triangulation). The majority of papers were from the United States (n=8; 61.5%). All but 1 study used simulation-enhanced interprofessional education as the preferred method to teach interprofessional cohorts of learners how to break bad news. The bulk of simulations were face-to-face (n=11; 84.6%). Three studies (23.1%) were reported as high fidelity, while the remainder did not disclose fidelity. All studies that used simulation to teach students how to break bad news utilized simulated participants/patients to portray patients and/or family in the simulations. The academic level of participants varied, with the majority noted as undergraduate (n=7; 53.8%); 3 studies (23.1%) indicated a mix of undergraduate and graduate participants, 2 (15.4%) were graduate only, and 1 (7.7%) was not disclosed. There was a range of health professional programs represented by participants, with medicine and nursing equally in the majority (n=10; 76.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation-enhanced interp","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1071-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139703654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sahil Goel, Delu Gunasekera, Giri Krishnan, Lucylynn Lizarondo, Andrew Foreman
Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the best available evidence regarding effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers.
Introduction: Transoral robotic surgery is now an established modality of treatment for primary head and neck cancer, showing good swallowing outcomes and quality of life for patients post-treatment. In patients with recurrent disease, conventional open surgery is often used, which prolongs recovery time and necessitates tissue disruption to gain access to the tumor site. Transoral robotic surgery is an emerging technique in this field as a minimally invasive approach to resection.
Inclusion criteria: The review will include experimental or observational studies that investigated the use of transoral robotic surgery in adults (aged 18 years or older) with recurrent head and neck cancers for oncological, functional, and survival outcomes.
Methods: Three databases will be searched for evidence: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Search terms for each database will include transoral robotic surgery, recurrent, salvage , and head and neck cancers . Reference lists of included articles will be searched for further evidence. Critical appraisal will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies. Data will be extracted by the same reviewers. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted for all outcomes.
{"title":"Effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery for recurrent head and neck cancers: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Sahil Goel, Delu Gunasekera, Giri Krishnan, Lucylynn Lizarondo, Andrew Foreman","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00359","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the best available evidence regarding effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transoral robotic surgery is now an established modality of treatment for primary head and neck cancer, showing good swallowing outcomes and quality of life for patients post-treatment. In patients with recurrent disease, conventional open surgery is often used, which prolongs recovery time and necessitates tissue disruption to gain access to the tumor site. Transoral robotic surgery is an emerging technique in this field as a minimally invasive approach to resection.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will include experimental or observational studies that investigated the use of transoral robotic surgery in adults (aged 18 years or older) with recurrent head and neck cancers for oncological, functional, and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases will be searched for evidence: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Search terms for each database will include transoral robotic surgery, recurrent, salvage , and head and neck cancers . Reference lists of included articles will be searched for further evidence. Critical appraisal will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies. Data will be extracted by the same reviewers. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023404613.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1129-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This review will identify the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in preventing iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women with a normal course of pregnancy.
Introduction: The global prevalence of anemia among pregnant women is 36.5%, posing risks to women and fetuses. This underscores the need for effective prevention; however, the effectiveness of non-pharmacological approaches in preventing pregnancy anemia remains unclear.
Inclusion criteria: This review will encompass experimental and quasi-experimental studies on the following approaches to prevent anemia during pregnancy: recommendations for dietary supplements, oral iron supplements (over the counter), provision of supplements to promote iron absorption, participation in anemia prevention education, and provision of information. There will be no restrictions on the duration or frequency of intervention, and longitudinal intervention studies will be included. In studies with a control group, the comparator may be usual care or pharmacological interventions; in studies without, it may involve no intervention, temporal comparisons, or baseline periods without non-pharmacological interventions. Evaluation of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin will be included as primary outcomes. Low birth weight, preterm birth, amount of blood loss at delivery, small for gestational age, and Apgar scores will be included as secondary outcomes.
Methods: A search will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ICHUSHI-Web. Researchers will screen studies, extract data, assess the quality of studies, and analyze the data in accordance with the JBI guidance for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the certainty of the findings.
{"title":"Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent anemia in pregnant women: a quantitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Qiongai Jin, Mikiko Shimizu, Masato Sugiura, Yumi Akashi, Keisuke Iwase, Hironori Tsuzuki, Noriko Suzuki, Tomoko Tanaka, Yukie Kitamura, Miyae Yamakawa","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00081","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will identify the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in preventing iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women with a normal course of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The global prevalence of anemia among pregnant women is 36.5%, posing risks to women and fetuses. This underscores the need for effective prevention; however, the effectiveness of non-pharmacological approaches in preventing pregnancy anemia remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will encompass experimental and quasi-experimental studies on the following approaches to prevent anemia during pregnancy: recommendations for dietary supplements, oral iron supplements (over the counter), provision of supplements to promote iron absorption, participation in anemia prevention education, and provision of information. There will be no restrictions on the duration or frequency of intervention, and longitudinal intervention studies will be included. In studies with a control group, the comparator may be usual care or pharmacological interventions; in studies without, it may involve no intervention, temporal comparisons, or baseline periods without non-pharmacological interventions. Evaluation of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin will be included as primary outcomes. Low birth weight, preterm birth, amount of blood loss at delivery, small for gestational age, and Apgar scores will be included as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ICHUSHI-Web. Researchers will screen studies, extract data, assess the quality of studies, and analyze the data in accordance with the JBI guidance for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the certainty of the findings.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022344155.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1122-1128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163888/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138810067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This review will synthesize and integrate current research on the practices relating to the insertion, removal, and management of short and midline peripheral intravenous catheters on consumer experiences and outcomes in acute health care. The aim is to provide consolidated evidence to support policy decision-makers and health care workers in overcoming peripheral intravenous catheter device management challenges. Implementing the evidence provided by this review could increase positive consumer outcomes and reduce the gap between research evidence and clinical practice.
Introduction: Peripheral intravenous catheterization is a process in which a device is inserted into a patient's peripheral vein to administer medication, blood products, and therapeutic fluids. Recent studies have demonstrated the positive and negative impacts of peripheral intravenous catheter site placement, pain relief for insertion, complications, consumer engagement, and routine versus clinically indicated removal of these devices on consumers and the health care system. Managing these impacts in relation to research-practice gaps and conflicting evidence remains challenging. Moreover, consumer experiences and outcomes concerning these challenges are unclear.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies on consumer experiences and outcomes in acute health care. The quantitative component will consider outcomes of patients' pain, satisfaction, anxiety, distress, preferences, fear, and comfort. The qualitative component will consider consumer experiences, including perceptions, preferences, perspectives, attitudes, expectations, and satisfaction.
Methods: This study will follow JBI's convergent segregated approach for mixed method systematic reviews. A search of 11 databases will be conducted for peer-reviewed published articles, theses, and dissertations. There will be no age, date, or language limitations.
{"title":"Consumer experience and outcomes of insertion, removal, and management practices of short and midline peripheral intravenous catheters in acute health care: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.","authors":"Michelle Nelson, Linda Coventry, Melanie Baker","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00172","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will synthesize and integrate current research on the practices relating to the insertion, removal, and management of short and midline peripheral intravenous catheters on consumer experiences and outcomes in acute health care. The aim is to provide consolidated evidence to support policy decision-makers and health care workers in overcoming peripheral intravenous catheter device management challenges. Implementing the evidence provided by this review could increase positive consumer outcomes and reduce the gap between research evidence and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral intravenous catheterization is a process in which a device is inserted into a patient's peripheral vein to administer medication, blood products, and therapeutic fluids. Recent studies have demonstrated the positive and negative impacts of peripheral intravenous catheter site placement, pain relief for insertion, complications, consumer engagement, and routine versus clinically indicated removal of these devices on consumers and the health care system. Managing these impacts in relation to research-practice gaps and conflicting evidence remains challenging. Moreover, consumer experiences and outcomes concerning these challenges are unclear.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies on consumer experiences and outcomes in acute health care. The quantitative component will consider outcomes of patients' pain, satisfaction, anxiety, distress, preferences, fear, and comfort. The qualitative component will consider consumer experiences, including perceptions, preferences, perspectives, attitudes, expectations, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study will follow JBI's convergent segregated approach for mixed method systematic reviews. A search of 11 databases will be conducted for peer-reviewed published articles, theses, and dissertations. There will be no age, date, or language limitations.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023410214.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1187-1196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139514108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This review will determine the prevalence and incidence of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous populations.
Introduction: There are approximately 476 million indigenous individuals worldwide. Oral cancer affected over 350,000 people globally in 2018, with approximately 80% of cases occurring in the indigenous population. Moreover, the incidence of pre-cancerous lesions is high in this population, accounting for 48.3%. Limited evidence exists regarding the burden of oral cancer among indigenous populations despite research on oral health disparities in this group.
Inclusion criteria: Studies on the burden of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous groups, considering rates, ratios (prevalence or mortality), or survival proportions, will be considered for inclusion. There will be no limitations on study design, language, age, gender, or geography. We will exclude studies that only identify, diagnose, or screen oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions without mentioning prevalence and incidence.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, OAIster, International Association for Dental Research conference abstracts, Google Scholar, government reports, and cancer registry reports will also be screened for unpublished studies. Two reviewers will independently screen articles, and data will be extracted using a customized form. Narrative data synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. Methodological quality will be assessed using JBI's critical appraisal tool for prevalence studies.
Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023402858.
目的:本综述将确定土著人口中口腔癌和癌前病变的流行率和发病率:本综述将确定口腔癌和癌前病变在土著居民中的流行率和发病率:全球约有 4.76 亿原住民。2018 年,全球有超过 35 万人罹患口腔癌,其中约 80% 的病例发生在原住民人群中。此外,该人群的癌前病变发病率很高,占 48.3%。尽管对原住民口腔健康差异进行了研究,但有关原住民口腔癌负担的证据有限:纳入标准包括有关土著群体口腔癌和癌前病变负担的研究,考虑比率、比例(患病率或死亡率)或存活比例。我们将检索从开始到现在的数据库,对研究设计、语言、年龄、性别或地域不做限制。我们将排除仅识别、诊断或筛查口腔癌和癌前病变而未提及患病率和发病率的研究:本综述将遵循 JBI 对流行率和发病率进行系统综述的方法。将检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Scopus 以及 Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost)。还将对 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses、OAIster、国际牙科研究协会会议摘要、Google Scholar、政府报告和癌症登记报告等未发表的研究进行筛选。两名审稿人将独立筛选文章,并使用定制表格提取数据。将进行叙述性数据综合,并酌情使用 JBI SUMARI 进行荟萃分析。方法学质量将使用 JBI 的流行病学研究关键评估工具进行评估:综述注册编号:PREMCORD42023402858。
{"title":"Prevalence and incidence of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous populations: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Swati Sapna, Praneetha Jain, Amrit Sharma, Rhythm Hora, Harshul Sharma, Vineetha Karuveettil","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00207","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00207","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will determine the prevalence and incidence of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous populations.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are approximately 476 million indigenous individuals worldwide. Oral cancer affected over 350,000 people globally in 2018, with approximately 80% of cases occurring in the indigenous population. Moreover, the incidence of pre-cancerous lesions is high in this population, accounting for 48.3%. Limited evidence exists regarding the burden of oral cancer among indigenous populations despite research on oral health disparities in this group.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies on the burden of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous groups, considering rates, ratios (prevalence or mortality), or survival proportions, will be considered for inclusion. There will be no limitations on study design, language, age, gender, or geography. We will exclude studies that only identify, diagnose, or screen oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions without mentioning prevalence and incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, OAIster, International Association for Dental Research conference abstracts, Google Scholar, government reports, and cancer registry reports will also be screened for unpublished studies. Two reviewers will independently screen articles, and data will be extracted using a customized form. Narrative data synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. Methodological quality will be assessed using JBI's critical appraisal tool for prevalence studies.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023402858.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139900594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emma Coulter, Conner McQueen, Zeina Abu-Jurji, Isabelle Chan-Emery, Mark Rukavina, Rachel Solecki, Sarah Wojkowski, Jasdeep Dhir
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to identify the frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver justice, equity, diversity, inclusion (JEDI), and anti-oppression (AO) principles in mandatory, entry-level health care professional program curricula (EHCPPC). A secondary objective will be to examine how these frameworks, guidelines, and models are used.
Introduction: Health inequities are perpetuated globally, as observed by the suboptimal quality of care and health outcomes among equity-deserving groups. An understanding of JEDI and AO concepts is necessary in health care settings to promote culturally safe and high-quality care; however, entry-level health care programs may lack adequate integration of content and/or delivery of these principles. This scoping review will summarize the international literature on frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver JEDI and AO concepts in EHCPPC.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider articles that discuss frameworks, models, or guidelines included in EHCPPC that guide the development and/or delivery of JEDI and AO principles in any country. Studies will be considered if they were published from 2015 to the present and are in English. All study designs will be considered for inclusion.
Methods: This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be conducted. Two or more independent reviewers will assess titles and abstracts, screen full-text studies, and extract data from included studies. Data from the included studies will be collated into tables or figures and described in a narrative summary.
Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/ewqf8.
目标:本范围综述的目的是确定用于制定和实施强制性入门级医疗保健专业课程(EHCPPC)中的公正、公平、多样性、包容性(JEDI)和反压迫(AO)原则的框架、指导方针和模式。次要目标是研究如何使用这些框架、准则和模式:在全球范围内,医疗不公平现象长期存在,值得公平对待的群体的医疗质量和医疗结果都不尽如人意。在医疗保健环境中,有必要了解 JEDI 和 AO 概念,以促进文化安全和高质量的医疗保健;然而,初级医疗保健课程可能缺乏对这些原则的内容和/或实施的充分整合。本范围界定综述将总结国际文献中有关框架、指南和模型的内容,这些框架、指南和模型用于在初级卫生保健计划中制定和实施 JEDI 和 AO 概念:本综述将考虑讨论用于指导在任何国家制定和/或实施 JEDI 和 AO 原则的 EHCPPC 框架、模型或指南的文章。如果研究发表于 2015 年至今,且使用英语,则将予以考虑。所有研究设计均可纳入考虑范围:本综述将按照 JBI 的范围界定综述方法进行。将检索 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid) 和 CINAHL (EBSCOhost)。两名或两名以上的独立审稿人将评估标题和摘要,筛选全文研究,并从纳入的研究中提取数据。纳入研究的数据将整理成表格或图表,并在叙述性摘要中加以说明:开放科学框架 osf.io/ewqf8。
{"title":"Development and delivery of justice, equity, diversity, inclusion, and anti-oppression concepts in entry-level health professional education: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Emma Coulter, Conner McQueen, Zeina Abu-Jurji, Isabelle Chan-Emery, Mark Rukavina, Rachel Solecki, Sarah Wojkowski, Jasdeep Dhir","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00223","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to identify the frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver justice, equity, diversity, inclusion (JEDI), and anti-oppression (AO) principles in mandatory, entry-level health care professional program curricula (EHCPPC). A secondary objective will be to examine how these frameworks, guidelines, and models are used.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health inequities are perpetuated globally, as observed by the suboptimal quality of care and health outcomes among equity-deserving groups. An understanding of JEDI and AO concepts is necessary in health care settings to promote culturally safe and high-quality care; however, entry-level health care programs may lack adequate integration of content and/or delivery of these principles. This scoping review will summarize the international literature on frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver JEDI and AO concepts in EHCPPC.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider articles that discuss frameworks, models, or guidelines included in EHCPPC that guide the development and/or delivery of JEDI and AO principles in any country. Studies will be considered if they were published from 2015 to the present and are in English. All study designs will be considered for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be conducted. Two or more independent reviewers will assess titles and abstracts, screen full-text studies, and extract data from included studies. Data from the included studies will be collated into tables or figures and described in a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/ewqf8.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1103-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and synthesize the available evidence on the prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants within 12 months of delivery.
Introduction: Mothers of preterm infants report more postpartum psychological problems than other mothers. Anxiety disorders are among the most frequently reported manifestations, and affect the quality of maternal care and the baby's development. However, data on the prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants are inconsistent and imprecise. It is, therefore, necessary to estimate the prevalence of anxiety disorders among mothers of premature infants in order to develop appropriate interventions for screening, support, and treatment.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider studies conducted in any setting and any geographical location that report on the prevalence of any anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants within 12 months of delivery. Any analytical or descriptive observational studies and experimental or quasi-experimental studies will be included.
Methods: MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Google Scholar, MedNar, and the World Health Organization website will be searched for studies written in English or French. Screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers using the relevant JBI systematic review tools. The findings will be presented in narrative format, including tables and figures to aid in data presentation.
{"title":"Prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Gilles Ndjomo, Sylvie Blairy, Nancy Durieux","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00250","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and synthesize the available evidence on the prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants within 12 months of delivery.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mothers of preterm infants report more postpartum psychological problems than other mothers. Anxiety disorders are among the most frequently reported manifestations, and affect the quality of maternal care and the baby's development. However, data on the prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants are inconsistent and imprecise. It is, therefore, necessary to estimate the prevalence of anxiety disorders among mothers of premature infants in order to develop appropriate interventions for screening, support, and treatment.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies conducted in any setting and any geographical location that report on the prevalence of any anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants within 12 months of delivery. Any analytical or descriptive observational studies and experimental or quasi-experimental studies will be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Google Scholar, MedNar, and the World Health Organization website will be searched for studies written in English or French. Screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers using the relevant JBI systematic review tools. The findings will be presented in narrative format, including tables and figures to aid in data presentation.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023428202.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1115-1121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139378354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}