首页 > 最新文献

JBI evidence synthesis最新文献

英文 中文
Erratum to: Impact of primary and recurrent genital herpes on the quality of life of young people and adults: a mixed methods systematic review. 勘误:原发性和复发性生殖器疱疹对年轻人和成年人生活质量的影响:混合方法系统综述。
IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00218
{"title":"Erratum to: Impact of primary and recurrent genital herpes on the quality of life of young people and adults: a mixed methods systematic review.","authors":"","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00218","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00218","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"22 6","pages":"1205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141307023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of combined virtual and clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies on health students' learning: a systematic review protocol. 虚拟和临床模拟相结合的教学策略与其他主动教学策略对医学生学习的效果比较:系统性综述方案。
IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00348
Andrea López-Navarrete, Melissa Zimmermann-Vildoso, Vanessa de Brito Poveda, Lilia de Souza Nogueira

Objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of combined virtual and clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies on health students' learning.

Introduction: Current evidence indicates that both virtual simulation and clinical simulation are effective in assisting students to acquire clinical skills. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of the combined use of both teaching strategies, which could enhance health students' learning.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies that address the combined use of virtual simulation with clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies in learning, clinical reasoning, clinical decision-making, and/or clinical competencies of health students. Combining different hybrid simulators to form a new one will not be considered for inclusion in the review.

Methods: The databases to be searched will include Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, LILACS (VHL), Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, ERIC, and gray literature sources. Two independent reviewers will perform the study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction using JBI tools. A narrative synthesis will be performed and, if possible, meta-analysis and risk assessment of publication bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach will be used to assess the certainty of the findings.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023422410.

目的本综述旨在综合现有证据,说明虚拟和临床模拟相结合的教学策略与其他主动教学策略相比,对医学生学习的有效性:目前的证据表明,虚拟模拟和临床模拟都能有效地帮助学生掌握临床技能。然而,在综合使用这两种教学策略的有效性方面还存在知识空白,而综合使用这两种教学策略可以提高医学生的学习效果:本综述将考虑实验性、准实验性和观察性研究,这些研究涉及虚拟仿真与临床仿真的结合使用与其他主动教学策略在医学生学习、临床推理、临床决策和/或临床能力方面的比较。将不同的混合模拟器组合成一个新的模拟器将不被考虑纳入综述:将检索的数据库包括 Cochrane Library、MEDLINE (PubMed)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Scopus、LILACS (VHL)、Web of Science Core Collection、Embase (Elsevier)、ERIC 和灰色文献来源。两名独立审稿人将使用 JBI 工具进行研究选择、批判性评估和数据提取。将进行叙述性综述,如有可能,还将进行荟萃分析和出版偏倚风险评估。将采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)来评估研究结果的确定性:综述注册:prospero crd42023422410。
{"title":"Effectiveness of combined virtual and clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies on health students' learning: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Andrea López-Navarrete, Melissa Zimmermann-Vildoso, Vanessa de Brito Poveda, Lilia de Souza Nogueira","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00348","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of combined virtual and clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies on health students' learning.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current evidence indicates that both virtual simulation and clinical simulation are effective in assisting students to acquire clinical skills. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of the combined use of both teaching strategies, which could enhance health students' learning.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies that address the combined use of virtual simulation with clinical simulation compared with other active teaching strategies in learning, clinical reasoning, clinical decision-making, and/or clinical competencies of health students. Combining different hybrid simulators to form a new one will not be considered for inclusion in the review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases to be searched will include Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, LILACS (VHL), Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, ERIC, and gray literature sources. Two independent reviewers will perform the study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction using JBI tools. A narrative synthesis will be performed and, if possible, meta-analysis and risk assessment of publication bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach will be used to assess the certainty of the findings.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023422410.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1170-1176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139098899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of fibrin sealants in head and neck surgery: a systematic review protocol. 纤维蛋白密封剂在头颈部手术中的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00142
Marie Nguyen, Andrew Foreman, Craig Lockwood

Objective: This review will investigate the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in adult patients who underwent head and neck surgery.

Introduction: Controlling bleeding is important in head and neck surgery. Complications involving nearby vital structures increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Surgical tissue adhesives are used in addition to other traditional hemostatic methods to reduce surgical site bleeding. Fibrin sealants have shown some success compared with other tissue adhesives, but individual studies have been inconclusive.

Inclusion criteria: We will include studies comparing fibrin sealants with placebo or usual care in patients 18 years or older who have undergone soft tissue surgery of the head and neck with drain placement. Primary outcomes include wound complications and time to surgical drain removal. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, drain volume output, surgical management of postoperative hematoma, rate of blood transfusions, and adverse reactions.

Methods: We will search electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science) for studies published from 1975 onwards. Sources to be search for unpublished literature will include ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MedNar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Titles, abstracts, and full-text papers will be assessed against the inclusion criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Study screening and selection will be performed, and critical appraisal conducted using the standardized JBI appraisal tools. Data will be extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analysis will be conducted for all outcomes where appropriate, with weighted mean differences for continuous data. Risk ratios will be used for dichotomous data. Certainty will be reported using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023412820.

目的:本综述将探讨纤维蛋白密封剂在接受头颈部手术的成人患者中的有效性。在头颈部手术中,控制出血是很重要的。涉及附近重要结构的并发症增加了发病和死亡的风险。除其他传统止血方法外,还使用外科组织粘接剂来减少手术部位出血。与其他组织粘接剂相比,纤维蛋白密封剂已显示出一些成功,但个别研究尚无定论。纳入标准:我们将纳入在18岁或以上接受头颈部软组织手术并放置引流管的患者中比较纤维蛋白密封剂与安慰剂或常规护理的研究。主要结局包括伤口并发症和手术引流时间。次要结局包括住院时间、排液量、术后血肿的手术处理、输血率和不良反应。方法:我们将检索电子数据库(PubMed, Embase, Cochrane对照试验数据库)中1975年以后发表的研究。题目、摘要和全文论文将由2名独立审稿人根据纳入标准进行评估。将进行研究筛选和选择,并使用标准化的JBI评估工具进行关键评估。数据将由2名独立审稿人提取。在适当的情况下,将对所有结果进行meta分析,对连续数据进行加权平均差异分析。风险比将用于二分类数据。将使用建议、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)方法报告确定性。审核注册:PROSPERO CRD42023412820。
{"title":"Effectiveness of fibrin sealants in head and neck surgery: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Marie Nguyen, Andrew Foreman, Craig Lockwood","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00142","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will investigate the effectiveness of fibrin sealants in adult patients who underwent head and neck surgery.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controlling bleeding is important in head and neck surgery. Complications involving nearby vital structures increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Surgical tissue adhesives are used in addition to other traditional hemostatic methods to reduce surgical site bleeding. Fibrin sealants have shown some success compared with other tissue adhesives, but individual studies have been inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>We will include studies comparing fibrin sealants with placebo or usual care in patients 18 years or older who have undergone soft tissue surgery of the head and neck with drain placement. Primary outcomes include wound complications and time to surgical drain removal. Secondary outcomes include length of hospital stay, drain volume output, surgical management of postoperative hematoma, rate of blood transfusions, and adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will search electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science) for studies published from 1975 onwards. Sources to be search for unpublished literature will include ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MedNar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Titles, abstracts, and full-text papers will be assessed against the inclusion criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Study screening and selection will be performed, and critical appraisal conducted using the standardized JBI appraisal tools. Data will be extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analysis will be conducted for all outcomes where appropriate, with weighted mean differences for continuous data. Risk ratios will be used for dichotomous data. Certainty will be reported using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023412820.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1151-1160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138446530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interprofessional collaboration between health professional learners when breaking bad news: a scoping review of teaching approaches. 医疗专业学习者在发布坏消息时的跨专业合作:教学方法范围综述。
IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00437
Kelly Lackie, Stephen Miller, Marion Brown, Amy Mireault, Melissa Helwig, Lorri Beatty, Leanne Picketts, Peter Stilwell, Shauna Houk
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review was to examine teaching approaches used to teach interprofessional health professional learners how to break bad news collaboratively.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When breaking bad news, health professionals must be equipped to deliver it skillfully and collaboratively; however, the literature shows that this skill receives little attention in program curricula. Consequently, health professionals can feel inadequately prepared to deliver bad news, which may lead to increased burnout, distress, and compassion fatigue.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies that describe teaching approaches used to teach learners how to break bad news collaboratively were considered for inclusion. Studies must have included 2 or more undergraduate and/or postgraduate learners working toward a professional health or social care qualification/degree at a university or college. Studies including lay, complementary and alternative, or non-health/social care learners were excluded. Due to the primary language of the research team, only English articles were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI 3-step process was followed for developing the search. Databases searched included MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, Education Resource Complete (EBSCOhost), and Social Work Abstracts (EBSCOhost). The initial search was conducted on February 11, 2021, and was updated on May 17, 2022. Title and abstract screening and data extraction were completed by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Results are presented in tabular or diagrammatic format, together with a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included in the scoping review, with a range of methodologies and designs (pre/post surveys, qualitative, feasibility, mixed methods, cross-sectional, quality improvement, and methodological triangulation). The majority of papers were from the United States (n=8; 61.5%). All but 1 study used simulation-enhanced interprofessional education as the preferred method to teach interprofessional cohorts of learners how to break bad news. The bulk of simulations were face-to-face (n=11; 84.6%). Three studies (23.1%) were reported as high fidelity, while the remainder did not disclose fidelity. All studies that used simulation to teach students how to break bad news utilized simulated participants/patients to portray patients and/or family in the simulations. The academic level of participants varied, with the majority noted as undergraduate (n=7; 53.8%); 3 studies (23.1%) indicated a mix of undergraduate and graduate participants, 2 (15.4%) were graduate only, and 1 (7.7%) was not disclosed. There was a range of health professional programs represented by participants, with medicine and nursing equally in the majority (n=10; 76.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation-enhanced interp
目的本综述旨在研究用于教授跨专业健康专业学习者如何以协作方式发布坏消息的教学方法:在发布坏消息时,医疗卫生专业人员必须具备熟练和协作发布坏消息的能力;然而,文献显示,这项技能在课程设置中很少受到关注。因此,医护人员在传递坏消息时会感到准备不足,这可能会导致职业倦怠、痛苦和同情疲劳加剧:纳入标准:纳入的研究应考虑描述用于教导学习者如何合作发布坏消息的教学方法。研究必须包括两名或两名以上在大学或学院攻读健康或社会护理专业资格/学位的本科生和/或研究生。包括非专业、补充性和替代性或非健康/社会护理学习者的研究不在考虑之列。由于研究团队的主要语言为英语,因此只收录英语文章:方法:按照 JBI 3 步流程进行检索。检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Embase、Education Resource Complete (EBSCOhost) 和 Social Work Abstracts (EBSCOhost)。首次检索于 2021 年 2 月 11 日进行,并于 2022 年 5 月 17 日更新。标题和摘要筛选以及数据提取由两名独立审稿人完成。如有异议,可通过讨论或与第三位审稿人协商解决。结果以表格或图表形式呈现,并附有叙述性摘要:13 项研究被纳入范围界定审查,研究方法和设计各不相同(事前/事后调查、定性、可行性、混合方法、横断面、质量改进和方法三角测量)。大多数论文来自美国(8 篇;61.5%)。除一项研究外,其他所有研究都将模拟强化跨专业教育作为教授跨专业学员如何打破坏消息的首选方法。大部分模拟教学都是面对面的(n=11;84.6%)。三项研究(23.1%)被报告为高保真,其余研究未披露保真度。所有使用模拟教学法教授学生如何告知坏消息的研究都使用了模拟参与者/患者,在模拟教学中扮演患者和/或家属的角色。参与者的学术水平参差不齐,大多数为本科生(7 人,占 53.8%);3 项研究(23.1%)表明参与者既有本科生也有研究生,2 项研究(15.4%)仅有研究生,1 项研究(7.7%)未披露。参与者代表了不同的卫生专业课程,其中医学和护理学同样占多数(10 人;76.9%):结论:模拟增强型跨专业教育是报告最多的教授跨专业学生如何合作发布坏消息的教学方法。在描述坏消息的语言、发布坏消息和跨专业能力框架的使用以及跨专业教育与模拟最佳实践的整合等方面存在不一致。进一步的研究应关注其他跨专业方法来教授如何发布坏消息、如何最好地将跨专业能力纳入跨专业发布坏消息教育、跨专业教育是否能加强合作发布坏消息,以及所学到的发布坏消息知识是否能长期保留并融入实践。未来针对模拟的研究应探讨是否以及如何实施《医疗保健模拟最佳实践标准》,以及模拟是否能提高学生的满意度和学习效果。
{"title":"Interprofessional collaboration between health professional learners when breaking bad news: a scoping review of teaching approaches.","authors":"Kelly Lackie, Stephen Miller, Marion Brown, Amy Mireault, Melissa Helwig, Lorri Beatty, Leanne Picketts, Peter Stilwell, Shauna Houk","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-22-00437","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-22-00437","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The objective of this scoping review was to examine teaching approaches used to teach interprofessional health professional learners how to break bad news collaboratively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;When breaking bad news, health professionals must be equipped to deliver it skillfully and collaboratively; however, the literature shows that this skill receives little attention in program curricula. Consequently, health professionals can feel inadequately prepared to deliver bad news, which may lead to increased burnout, distress, and compassion fatigue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inclusion criteria: &lt;/strong&gt;Studies that describe teaching approaches used to teach learners how to break bad news collaboratively were considered for inclusion. Studies must have included 2 or more undergraduate and/or postgraduate learners working toward a professional health or social care qualification/degree at a university or college. Studies including lay, complementary and alternative, or non-health/social care learners were excluded. Due to the primary language of the research team, only English articles were included.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The JBI 3-step process was followed for developing the search. Databases searched included MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, Education Resource Complete (EBSCOhost), and Social Work Abstracts (EBSCOhost). The initial search was conducted on February 11, 2021, and was updated on May 17, 2022. Title and abstract screening and data extraction were completed by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Results are presented in tabular or diagrammatic format, together with a narrative summary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Thirteen studies were included in the scoping review, with a range of methodologies and designs (pre/post surveys, qualitative, feasibility, mixed methods, cross-sectional, quality improvement, and methodological triangulation). The majority of papers were from the United States (n=8; 61.5%). All but 1 study used simulation-enhanced interprofessional education as the preferred method to teach interprofessional cohorts of learners how to break bad news. The bulk of simulations were face-to-face (n=11; 84.6%). Three studies (23.1%) were reported as high fidelity, while the remainder did not disclose fidelity. All studies that used simulation to teach students how to break bad news utilized simulated participants/patients to portray patients and/or family in the simulations. The academic level of participants varied, with the majority noted as undergraduate (n=7; 53.8%); 3 studies (23.1%) indicated a mix of undergraduate and graduate participants, 2 (15.4%) were graduate only, and 1 (7.7%) was not disclosed. There was a range of health professional programs represented by participants, with medicine and nursing equally in the majority (n=10; 76.9%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Simulation-enhanced interp","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1071-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139703654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery for recurrent head and neck cancers: a systematic review protocol. 经口机器人手术治疗复发性头颈部癌症的效果:系统综述方案。
IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00359
Sahil Goel, Delu Gunasekera, Giri Krishnan, Lucylynn Lizarondo, Andrew Foreman

Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the best available evidence regarding effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers.

Introduction: Transoral robotic surgery is now an established modality of treatment for primary head and neck cancer, showing good swallowing outcomes and quality of life for patients post-treatment. In patients with recurrent disease, conventional open surgery is often used, which prolongs recovery time and necessitates tissue disruption to gain access to the tumor site. Transoral robotic surgery is an emerging technique in this field as a minimally invasive approach to resection.

Inclusion criteria: The review will include experimental or observational studies that investigated the use of transoral robotic surgery in adults (aged 18 years or older) with recurrent head and neck cancers for oncological, functional, and survival outcomes.

Methods: Three databases will be searched for evidence: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Search terms for each database will include transoral robotic surgery, recurrent, salvage , and head and neck cancers . Reference lists of included articles will be searched for further evidence. Critical appraisal will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies. Data will be extracted by the same reviewers. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted for all outcomes.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023404613.

目的本系统综述旨在评估经口机器人手术(TORS)对复发性头颈部癌症患者疗效的现有最佳证据:TORS是目前治疗原发性头颈部癌症的一种成熟方式,显示出良好的吞咽效果和治疗后患者的生活质量。对于复发患者,通常采用传统的开放手术,这不仅延长了患者的恢复时间,而且必须破坏组织才能进入肿瘤部位。作为一种微创切除方法,TORS 仍是这一领域的新兴技术:综述将包括调查 TORS 用于复发性头颈部癌症成人(18 岁或以上)无病生存率和总生存率的实验性或观察性研究:方法:将在三个数据库中搜索证据:PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus。每个数据库的检索词包括经口机器人手术、复发、挽救和头颈部癌症。还将对收录文章的参考文献列表进行检索,以获取更多证据。将由两名独立审稿人使用 JBI 定量研究关键评价工具进行关键评价。数据将由同一审稿人提取。在适当的情况下,将对所有结果进行荟萃分析:PREMCORD42023404613。
{"title":"Effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery for recurrent head and neck cancers: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Sahil Goel, Delu Gunasekera, Giri Krishnan, Lucylynn Lizarondo, Andrew Foreman","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00359","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the best available evidence regarding effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery in patients with recurrent head and neck cancers.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transoral robotic surgery is now an established modality of treatment for primary head and neck cancer, showing good swallowing outcomes and quality of life for patients post-treatment. In patients with recurrent disease, conventional open surgery is often used, which prolongs recovery time and necessitates tissue disruption to gain access to the tumor site. Transoral robotic surgery is an emerging technique in this field as a minimally invasive approach to resection.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>The review will include experimental or observational studies that investigated the use of transoral robotic surgery in adults (aged 18 years or older) with recurrent head and neck cancers for oncological, functional, and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three databases will be searched for evidence: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Search terms for each database will include transoral robotic surgery, recurrent, salvage , and head and neck cancers . Reference lists of included articles will be searched for further evidence. Critical appraisal will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers using the JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies. Data will be extracted by the same reviewers. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023404613.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1129-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent anemia in pregnant women: a quantitative systematic review protocol. 预防孕妇贫血的非药物干预措施的有效性:定量系统综述方案。
IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00081
Qiongai Jin, Mikiko Shimizu, Masato Sugiura, Yumi Akashi, Keisuke Iwase, Hironori Tsuzuki, Noriko Suzuki, Tomoko Tanaka, Yukie Kitamura, Miyae Yamakawa

Objective: This review will identify the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in preventing iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women with a normal course of pregnancy.

Introduction: The global prevalence of anemia among pregnant women is 36.5%, posing risks to women and fetuses. This underscores the need for effective prevention; however, the effectiveness of non-pharmacological approaches in preventing pregnancy anemia remains unclear.

Inclusion criteria: This review will encompass experimental and quasi-experimental studies on the following approaches to prevent anemia during pregnancy: recommendations for dietary supplements, oral iron supplements (over the counter), provision of supplements to promote iron absorption, participation in anemia prevention education, and provision of information. There will be no restrictions on the duration or frequency of intervention, and longitudinal intervention studies will be included. In studies with a control group, the comparator may be usual care or pharmacological interventions; in studies without, it may involve no intervention, temporal comparisons, or baseline periods without non-pharmacological interventions. Evaluation of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin will be included as primary outcomes. Low birth weight, preterm birth, amount of blood loss at delivery, small for gestational age, and Apgar scores will be included as secondary outcomes.

Methods: A search will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ICHUSHI-Web. Researchers will screen studies, extract data, assess the quality of studies, and analyze the data in accordance with the JBI guidance for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the certainty of the findings.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022344155.

目的:本综述旨在确定非药物干预措施在预防正常妊娠妇女缺铁性贫血方面的有效性:本综述旨在确定非药物干预措施对预防孕期正常的孕妇缺铁性贫血的有效性:全球孕妇贫血患病率为 36.5%,这对妇女和胎儿都构成了风险。这凸显了有效预防的必要性;然而,非药物疗法在预防妊娠贫血方面的有效性仍不明确:本综述将包括有关以下预防孕期贫血方法的实验和准实验研究:推荐膳食补充剂、口服铁补充剂(非处方药)、提供促进铁吸收的补充剂、参与贫血预防教育和提供信息。对干预的持续时间或频率没有限制,并将纳入纵向干预研究。在有对照组的研究中,比较对象可以是常规护理或药物干预;在没有对照组的研究中,比较对象可以是无干预、时间比较或无非药物干预的基线期。血红蛋白、血细胞比容和铁蛋白的评估将作为主要结果。低出生体重、早产、分娩失血量、胎龄小和阿普加评分将作为次要结果:方法:将对 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Scopus、澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验注册中心、Cochrane 对照试验中央注册中心和 ICHUSHI-Web 进行检索。研究人员将筛选研究、提取数据、评估研究质量,并根据 JBI 的有效性系统回顾指南分析数据。将使用 GRADE 评估研究结果的确定性:ProCORMBERCO CRD42022344155.
{"title":"Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent anemia in pregnant women: a quantitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Qiongai Jin, Mikiko Shimizu, Masato Sugiura, Yumi Akashi, Keisuke Iwase, Hironori Tsuzuki, Noriko Suzuki, Tomoko Tanaka, Yukie Kitamura, Miyae Yamakawa","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00081","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will identify the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in preventing iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women with a normal course of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The global prevalence of anemia among pregnant women is 36.5%, posing risks to women and fetuses. This underscores the need for effective prevention; however, the effectiveness of non-pharmacological approaches in preventing pregnancy anemia remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will encompass experimental and quasi-experimental studies on the following approaches to prevent anemia during pregnancy: recommendations for dietary supplements, oral iron supplements (over the counter), provision of supplements to promote iron absorption, participation in anemia prevention education, and provision of information. There will be no restrictions on the duration or frequency of intervention, and longitudinal intervention studies will be included. In studies with a control group, the comparator may be usual care or pharmacological interventions; in studies without, it may involve no intervention, temporal comparisons, or baseline periods without non-pharmacological interventions. Evaluation of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin will be included as primary outcomes. Low birth weight, preterm birth, amount of blood loss at delivery, small for gestational age, and Apgar scores will be included as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ICHUSHI-Web. Researchers will screen studies, extract data, assess the quality of studies, and analyze the data in accordance with the JBI guidance for systematic reviews of effectiveness. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the certainty of the findings.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022344155.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1122-1128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163888/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138810067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consumer experience and outcomes of insertion, removal, and management practices of short and midline peripheral intravenous catheters in acute health care: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. 消费者对急症医疗中短线和中线外周静脉导管的插入、移除和管理方法的体验和结果:混合方法系统综述方案。
IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00172
Michelle Nelson, Linda Coventry, Melanie Baker

Objective: This review will synthesize and integrate current research on the practices relating to the insertion, removal, and management of short and midline peripheral intravenous catheters on consumer experiences and outcomes in acute health care. The aim is to provide consolidated evidence to support policy decision-makers and health care workers in overcoming peripheral intravenous catheter device management challenges. Implementing the evidence provided by this review could increase positive consumer outcomes and reduce the gap between research evidence and clinical practice.

Introduction: Peripheral intravenous catheterization is a process in which a device is inserted into a patient's peripheral vein to administer medication, blood products, and therapeutic fluids. Recent studies have demonstrated the positive and negative impacts of peripheral intravenous catheter site placement, pain relief for insertion, complications, consumer engagement, and routine versus clinically indicated removal of these devices on consumers and the health care system. Managing these impacts in relation to research-practice gaps and conflicting evidence remains challenging. Moreover, consumer experiences and outcomes concerning these challenges are unclear.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies on consumer experiences and outcomes in acute health care. The quantitative component will consider outcomes of patients' pain, satisfaction, anxiety, distress, preferences, fear, and comfort. The qualitative component will consider consumer experiences, including perceptions, preferences, perspectives, attitudes, expectations, and satisfaction.

Methods: This study will follow JBI's convergent segregated approach for mixed method systematic reviews. A search of 11 databases will be conducted for peer-reviewed published articles, theses, and dissertations. There will be no age, date, or language limitations.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023410214.

目的:本综述将综述和整合当前有关插入、移除和管理短线和中线外周静脉导管的实践对急症医疗保健中消费者体验和结果的影响的研究。目的是提供综合证据,支持政策决策者和医护人员克服外周静脉导管设备管理方面的挑战。实施本综述提供的证据可以提高消费者的积极效果,缩小研究证据与临床实践之间的差距:外周静脉导管植入术是一种将装置插入患者外周静脉以进行药物、血液制品和治疗性液体注射的过程。最近的研究表明,外周静脉导管置入位置、插入时的疼痛缓解、并发症、消费者参与以及常规与临床指示的移除这些装置对消费者和医疗保健系统都有积极和消极的影响。由于研究与实践之间存在差距,且证据之间存在冲突,因此处理这些影响仍具有挑战性。此外,消费者对这些挑战的体验和结果也不清楚:本综述将考虑有关消费者在急性期医疗保健中的体验和结果的定量、定性和混合方法研究。定量研究将考虑疼痛、满意度、焦虑和痛苦的结果。定性部分将考虑消费者的体验,包括感知、偏好、观点、态度、期望和满意度:本研究将遵循 JBI 的混合方法系统综述的聚合分离法。将在 12 个数据库中搜索经同行评审的已发表文章、论文和学位论文。没有年龄、日期或语言限制:prospero(CRD42023410214)。
{"title":"Consumer experience and outcomes of insertion, removal, and management practices of short and midline peripheral intravenous catheters in acute health care: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.","authors":"Michelle Nelson, Linda Coventry, Melanie Baker","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00172","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00172","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will synthesize and integrate current research on the practices relating to the insertion, removal, and management of short and midline peripheral intravenous catheters on consumer experiences and outcomes in acute health care. The aim is to provide consolidated evidence to support policy decision-makers and health care workers in overcoming peripheral intravenous catheter device management challenges. Implementing the evidence provided by this review could increase positive consumer outcomes and reduce the gap between research evidence and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral intravenous catheterization is a process in which a device is inserted into a patient's peripheral vein to administer medication, blood products, and therapeutic fluids. Recent studies have demonstrated the positive and negative impacts of peripheral intravenous catheter site placement, pain relief for insertion, complications, consumer engagement, and routine versus clinically indicated removal of these devices on consumers and the health care system. Managing these impacts in relation to research-practice gaps and conflicting evidence remains challenging. Moreover, consumer experiences and outcomes concerning these challenges are unclear.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies on consumer experiences and outcomes in acute health care. The quantitative component will consider outcomes of patients' pain, satisfaction, anxiety, distress, preferences, fear, and comfort. The qualitative component will consider consumer experiences, including perceptions, preferences, perspectives, attitudes, expectations, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study will follow JBI's convergent segregated approach for mixed method systematic reviews. A search of 11 databases will be conducted for peer-reviewed published articles, theses, and dissertations. There will be no age, date, or language limitations.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023410214.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1187-1196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139514108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and incidence of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous populations: a systematic review protocol. 原住民口腔癌和癌前病变的流行率和发病率:系统性审查协议。
IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00207
Swati Sapna, Praneetha Jain, Amrit Sharma, Rhythm Hora, Harshul Sharma, Vineetha Karuveettil

Objective: This review will determine the prevalence and incidence of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous populations.

Introduction: There are approximately 476 million indigenous individuals worldwide. Oral cancer affected over 350,000 people globally in 2018, with approximately 80% of cases occurring in the indigenous population. Moreover, the incidence of pre-cancerous lesions is high in this population, accounting for 48.3%. Limited evidence exists regarding the burden of oral cancer among indigenous populations despite research on oral health disparities in this group.

Inclusion criteria: Studies on the burden of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous groups, considering rates, ratios (prevalence or mortality), or survival proportions, will be considered for inclusion. There will be no limitations on study design, language, age, gender, or geography. We will exclude studies that only identify, diagnose, or screen oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions without mentioning prevalence and incidence.

Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, OAIster, International Association for Dental Research conference abstracts, Google Scholar, government reports, and cancer registry reports will also be screened for unpublished studies. Two reviewers will independently screen articles, and data will be extracted using a customized form. Narrative data synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. Methodological quality will be assessed using JBI's critical appraisal tool for prevalence studies.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023402858.

目的:本综述将确定土著人口中口腔癌和癌前病变的流行率和发病率:本综述将确定口腔癌和癌前病变在土著居民中的流行率和发病率:全球约有 4.76 亿原住民。2018 年,全球有超过 35 万人罹患口腔癌,其中约 80% 的病例发生在原住民人群中。此外,该人群的癌前病变发病率很高,占 48.3%。尽管对原住民口腔健康差异进行了研究,但有关原住民口腔癌负担的证据有限:纳入标准包括有关土著群体口腔癌和癌前病变负担的研究,考虑比率、比例(患病率或死亡率)或存活比例。我们将检索从开始到现在的数据库,对研究设计、语言、年龄、性别或地域不做限制。我们将排除仅识别、诊断或筛查口腔癌和癌前病变而未提及患病率和发病率的研究:本综述将遵循 JBI 对流行率和发病率进行系统综述的方法。将检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Scopus 以及 Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost)。还将对 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses、OAIster、国际牙科研究协会会议摘要、Google Scholar、政府报告和癌症登记报告等未发表的研究进行筛选。两名审稿人将独立筛选文章,并使用定制表格提取数据。将进行叙述性数据综合,并酌情使用 JBI SUMARI 进行荟萃分析。方法学质量将使用 JBI 的流行病学研究关键评估工具进行评估:综述注册编号:PREMCORD42023402858。
{"title":"Prevalence and incidence of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous populations: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Swati Sapna, Praneetha Jain, Amrit Sharma, Rhythm Hora, Harshul Sharma, Vineetha Karuveettil","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00207","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00207","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will determine the prevalence and incidence of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous populations.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are approximately 476 million indigenous individuals worldwide. Oral cancer affected over 350,000 people globally in 2018, with approximately 80% of cases occurring in the indigenous population. Moreover, the incidence of pre-cancerous lesions is high in this population, accounting for 48.3%. Limited evidence exists regarding the burden of oral cancer among indigenous populations despite research on oral health disparities in this group.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies on the burden of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in indigenous groups, considering rates, ratios (prevalence or mortality), or survival proportions, will be considered for inclusion. There will be no limitations on study design, language, age, gender, or geography. We will exclude studies that only identify, diagnose, or screen oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions without mentioning prevalence and incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCOhost). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, OAIster, International Association for Dental Research conference abstracts, Google Scholar, government reports, and cancer registry reports will also be screened for unpublished studies. Two reviewers will independently screen articles, and data will be extracted using a customized form. Narrative data synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. Methodological quality will be assessed using JBI's critical appraisal tool for prevalence studies.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023402858.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1177-1186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139900594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and delivery of justice, equity, diversity, inclusion, and anti-oppression concepts in entry-level health professional education: a scoping review protocol. 入门级卫生专业教育中正义、公平、多样性、包容和反压迫概念的发展与实施:范围界定审查协议。
IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00223
Emma Coulter, Conner McQueen, Zeina Abu-Jurji, Isabelle Chan-Emery, Mark Rukavina, Rachel Solecki, Sarah Wojkowski, Jasdeep Dhir

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to identify the frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver justice, equity, diversity, inclusion (JEDI), and anti-oppression (AO) principles in mandatory, entry-level health care professional program curricula (EHCPPC). A secondary objective will be to examine how these frameworks, guidelines, and models are used.

Introduction: Health inequities are perpetuated globally, as observed by the suboptimal quality of care and health outcomes among equity-deserving groups. An understanding of JEDI and AO concepts is necessary in health care settings to promote culturally safe and high-quality care; however, entry-level health care programs may lack adequate integration of content and/or delivery of these principles. This scoping review will summarize the international literature on frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver JEDI and AO concepts in EHCPPC.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider articles that discuss frameworks, models, or guidelines included in EHCPPC that guide the development and/or delivery of JEDI and AO principles in any country. Studies will be considered if they were published from 2015 to the present and are in English. All study designs will be considered for inclusion.

Methods: This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be conducted. Two or more independent reviewers will assess titles and abstracts, screen full-text studies, and extract data from included studies. Data from the included studies will be collated into tables or figures and described in a narrative summary.

Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/ewqf8.

目标:本范围综述的目的是确定用于制定和实施强制性入门级医疗保健专业课程(EHCPPC)中的公正、公平、多样性、包容性(JEDI)和反压迫(AO)原则的框架、指导方针和模式。次要目标是研究如何使用这些框架、准则和模式:在全球范围内,医疗不公平现象长期存在,值得公平对待的群体的医疗质量和医疗结果都不尽如人意。在医疗保健环境中,有必要了解 JEDI 和 AO 概念,以促进文化安全和高质量的医疗保健;然而,初级医疗保健课程可能缺乏对这些原则的内容和/或实施的充分整合。本范围界定综述将总结国际文献中有关框架、指南和模型的内容,这些框架、指南和模型用于在初级卫生保健计划中制定和实施 JEDI 和 AO 概念:本综述将考虑讨论用于指导在任何国家制定和/或实施 JEDI 和 AO 原则的 EHCPPC 框架、模型或指南的文章。如果研究发表于 2015 年至今,且使用英语,则将予以考虑。所有研究设计均可纳入考虑范围:本综述将按照 JBI 的范围界定综述方法进行。将检索 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid) 和 CINAHL (EBSCOhost)。两名或两名以上的独立审稿人将评估标题和摘要,筛选全文研究,并从纳入的研究中提取数据。纳入研究的数据将整理成表格或图表,并在叙述性摘要中加以说明:开放科学框架 osf.io/ewqf8。
{"title":"Development and delivery of justice, equity, diversity, inclusion, and anti-oppression concepts in entry-level health professional education: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Emma Coulter, Conner McQueen, Zeina Abu-Jurji, Isabelle Chan-Emery, Mark Rukavina, Rachel Solecki, Sarah Wojkowski, Jasdeep Dhir","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00223","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to identify the frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver justice, equity, diversity, inclusion (JEDI), and anti-oppression (AO) principles in mandatory, entry-level health care professional program curricula (EHCPPC). A secondary objective will be to examine how these frameworks, guidelines, and models are used.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health inequities are perpetuated globally, as observed by the suboptimal quality of care and health outcomes among equity-deserving groups. An understanding of JEDI and AO concepts is necessary in health care settings to promote culturally safe and high-quality care; however, entry-level health care programs may lack adequate integration of content and/or delivery of these principles. This scoping review will summarize the international literature on frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver JEDI and AO concepts in EHCPPC.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider articles that discuss frameworks, models, or guidelines included in EHCPPC that guide the development and/or delivery of JEDI and AO principles in any country. Studies will be considered if they were published from 2015 to the present and are in English. All study designs will be considered for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be conducted. Two or more independent reviewers will assess titles and abstracts, screen full-text studies, and extract data from included studies. Data from the included studies will be collated into tables or figures and described in a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/ewqf8.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1103-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants: a systematic review protocol. 早产儿母亲产后焦虑症的患病率:系统综述方案。
IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00250
Gilles Ndjomo, Sylvie Blairy, Nancy Durieux

Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and synthesize the available evidence on the prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants within 12 months of delivery.

Introduction: Mothers of preterm infants report more postpartum psychological problems than other mothers. Anxiety disorders are among the most frequently reported manifestations, and affect the quality of maternal care and the baby's development. However, data on the prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants are inconsistent and imprecise. It is, therefore, necessary to estimate the prevalence of anxiety disorders among mothers of premature infants in order to develop appropriate interventions for screening, support, and treatment.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider studies conducted in any setting and any geographical location that report on the prevalence of any anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants within 12 months of delivery. Any analytical or descriptive observational studies and experimental or quasi-experimental studies will be included.

Methods: MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Google Scholar, MedNar, and the World Health Organization website will be searched for studies written in English or French. Screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers using the relevant JBI systematic review tools. The findings will be presented in narrative format, including tables and figures to aid in data presentation.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023428202.

摘要本系统综述的目的是评估和综合有关早产儿母亲在产后 12 个月内产后焦虑症发生率的现有证据:早产儿母亲比其他母亲更容易出现产后心理问题。焦虑症是最常报告的表现之一,会影响产妇的护理质量和婴儿的发育。然而,有关早产儿母亲产后焦虑症发病率的数据并不一致,也不精确。因此,有必要对早产儿母亲焦虑症的患病率进行估计,以便制定适当的筛查、支持和治疗干预措施:本综述将考虑在任何环境和任何地理位置进行的、报告早产儿母亲在产后 12 个月内焦虑症患病率的研究。任何分析性或描述性观察研究以及实验性或准实验性研究都将被纳入:方法:将检索 MEDLINE (Ovid)、PsycINFO (Ovid)、Embase (Elsevier)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Google Scholar、MedNar 和世界卫生组织网站上以英语或法语撰写的研究。筛选、批判性评估和数据提取将由两名独立审稿人使用相关的 JBI 系统综述工具进行。研究结果将以叙述的形式呈现,包括有助于数据呈现的表格和图表:综述注册:prospero crd42023428202。
{"title":"Prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Gilles Ndjomo, Sylvie Blairy, Nancy Durieux","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00250","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate and synthesize the available evidence on the prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants within 12 months of delivery.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mothers of preterm infants report more postpartum psychological problems than other mothers. Anxiety disorders are among the most frequently reported manifestations, and affect the quality of maternal care and the baby's development. However, data on the prevalence of postnatal anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants are inconsistent and imprecise. It is, therefore, necessary to estimate the prevalence of anxiety disorders among mothers of premature infants in order to develop appropriate interventions for screening, support, and treatment.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies conducted in any setting and any geographical location that report on the prevalence of any anxiety disorders in mothers of preterm infants within 12 months of delivery. Any analytical or descriptive observational studies and experimental or quasi-experimental studies will be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Google Scholar, MedNar, and the World Health Organization website will be searched for studies written in English or French. Screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers using the relevant JBI systematic review tools. The findings will be presented in narrative format, including tables and figures to aid in data presentation.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023428202.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1115-1121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139378354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1