Objective: The objective of this review is to explore the experiences of people with diabetes who used telehealth for diabetes management due to COVID-19 pandemic protocols rather than traditional in-person consultations.
Introduction: COVID-19 intensified globally from January 2020, eliciting a multinational response to infection control for health preservation, including social distancing in public areas and health care settings. The outcome had a significant impact on the health care system, where people with chronic diseases, such as those with diabetes, were required to transition most of their care to telehealth to align with social restrictions.
Inclusion criteria: This review will include qualitative and mixed methods studies and theses of any research design and in any language that examine the experiences of adults with diabetes who transitioned from in-person consultations to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusions will include pre-COVID-19 data; quantitative studies; and secondary, tertiary, and all other gray literature.
Methods: A search of CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Emcare (Ovid), Embase, PubMed (NCBI), and several ProQuest databases will be conducted. Studies from January 2020 onwards in any language will be assessed for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and screen titles and abstracts and full-text studies, and assess the methodological quality of the included studies utilizing the JBI qualitative critical appraisal tool. The included studies will be synthesized utilizing JBI meta-aggregation, and the certainty of the findings will be assessed with ConQual.
{"title":"Experiences of people with diabetes mellitus of telehealth for diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Alexander Gerrie, Susan Bellman, Danielle Pollock","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00286","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00286","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to explore the experiences of people with diabetes who used telehealth for diabetes management due to COVID-19 pandemic protocols rather than traditional in-person consultations.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19 intensified globally from January 2020, eliciting a multinational response to infection control for health preservation, including social distancing in public areas and health care settings. The outcome had a significant impact on the health care system, where people with chronic diseases, such as those with diabetes, were required to transition most of their care to telehealth to align with social restrictions.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include qualitative and mixed methods studies and theses of any research design and in any language that examine the experiences of adults with diabetes who transitioned from in-person consultations to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusions will include pre-COVID-19 data; quantitative studies; and secondary, tertiary, and all other gray literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Emcare (Ovid), Embase, PubMed (NCBI), and several ProQuest databases will be conducted. Studies from January 2020 onwards in any language will be assessed for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and screen titles and abstracts and full-text studies, and assess the methodological quality of the included studies utilizing the JBI qualitative critical appraisal tool. The included studies will be synthesized utilizing JBI meta-aggregation, and the certainty of the findings will be assessed with ConQual.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023424667.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1329-1335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139088895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this mixed methods review was to examine the effectiveness and family experiences of interventions promoting partnerships between families and the multidisciplinary health care team in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospitalization of infants and children in neonatal intensive care units and pediatric intensive care units has a significant effect on their families, including increased stress, anxiety, and depression. Available evidence syntheses focused on specific family-centered care, but not on partnership, which is another aspect that may improve families' outcomes and experiences.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review considered studies that focused on effectiveness or family experiences of interventions by health professionals in partnership with families of infants or children hospitalized in an intensive care unit. For the quantitative component of the review, the type of intervention was a partnership between the health care team and the family, and focused on outcomes of stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, attachment, or satisfaction with family-centered care. For the qualitative component, the phenomenon of interest was family experiences of interventions that included collaboration and partnering with the health care team in the pediatric or neonatal intensive care unit. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies, published from 2000 to August 2022 in English or French, were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI methodology for convergent segregated mixed methods systematic reviews was followed using the standardized JBI critical appraisal and data extraction tools. Ten databases were searched in December 2019 and again in August 2022. Study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently. Findings of quantitative studies were statistically pooled through meta-analysis and those that could not be pooled were reported narratively. Qualitative studies were pooled through meta-synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 6 qualitative and 42 quantitative studies. The methodological quality varied, and all studies were included regardless of methodological quality. Meta-analyses showed improvements in anxiety, satisfaction with family-centered care, and stress, yet no conclusive effects in attachment and depression. These results should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity. Qualitative analysis resulted in 2 synthesized findings: "Interventions that incorporate partnerships between families and the health care team can improve the family's experience and capacity to care for the child" and "Having a child in intensive care can be an experience of significant impact for families." Integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence revealed some congruence between findings; however, the paucity of
{"title":"Effectiveness and family experiences of interventions promoting partnerships between families and pediatric and neonatal intensive care units: a mixed methods systematic review.","authors":"Shannon Barnes, Ibo Macdonald, Zahra Rahmaty, Véronique de Goumoëns, Chantal Grandjean, Cécile Jaques, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00034","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this mixed methods review was to examine the effectiveness and family experiences of interventions promoting partnerships between families and the multidisciplinary health care team in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospitalization of infants and children in neonatal intensive care units and pediatric intensive care units has a significant effect on their families, including increased stress, anxiety, and depression. Available evidence syntheses focused on specific family-centered care, but not on partnership, which is another aspect that may improve families' outcomes and experiences.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review considered studies that focused on effectiveness or family experiences of interventions by health professionals in partnership with families of infants or children hospitalized in an intensive care unit. For the quantitative component of the review, the type of intervention was a partnership between the health care team and the family, and focused on outcomes of stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, attachment, or satisfaction with family-centered care. For the qualitative component, the phenomenon of interest was family experiences of interventions that included collaboration and partnering with the health care team in the pediatric or neonatal intensive care unit. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies, published from 2000 to August 2022 in English or French, were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI methodology for convergent segregated mixed methods systematic reviews was followed using the standardized JBI critical appraisal and data extraction tools. Ten databases were searched in December 2019 and again in August 2022. Study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction were performed by 2 reviewers independently. Findings of quantitative studies were statistically pooled through meta-analysis and those that could not be pooled were reported narratively. Qualitative studies were pooled through meta-synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 6 qualitative and 42 quantitative studies. The methodological quality varied, and all studies were included regardless of methodological quality. Meta-analyses showed improvements in anxiety, satisfaction with family-centered care, and stress, yet no conclusive effects in attachment and depression. These results should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity. Qualitative analysis resulted in 2 synthesized findings: \"Interventions that incorporate partnerships between families and the health care team can improve the family's experience and capacity to care for the child\" and \"Having a child in intensive care can be an experience of significant impact for families.\" Integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence revealed some congruence between findings; however, the paucity of ","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1208-1261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230661/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140176880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yuta Koto, Shingo Ueki, Miyae Yamakawa, Norio Sakai
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to synthesize the experiences of patients with metachromatic leukodystrophy, adrenoleukodystrophy, or Krabbe disease and the experiences of their families.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Leukodystrophies are metabolic diseases caused by genetic mutations. There are multiple forms of the disease, varying in age of onset and symptoms. The progression of leukodystrophies worsens central nervous system symptoms and significantly affects the lives of patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Qualitative studies on the experiences of patients with leukodystrophies and their family members were included. These experiences included treatments such as enzyme replacement therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; effects of tracheostomy and gastrostomy; burdens on the family, coordinating care within the health care system, and family planning due to genetic disorders. This review considered studies in any setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and MedNar databases were searched on November 18, 2022. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis were conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence, and synthesized findings were evaluated according to the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies were eligible for synthesis, and 45 findings were extracted corresponding with participants' voices. Of these findings, 40 were unequivocal and 5 were credible. The diseases in the included studies were metachromatic leukodystrophy and adrenoleukodystrophy; no studies were identified for patients with Krabbe disease and their families. These findings were grouped into 11 categories and integrated into 3 synthesized findings, including i) providing care by family members and health care providers as physical symptoms progress, which relates to the effects of the characteristics of progressive leukodystrophies; ii) building medical teamwork to provide appropriate support services, comprising categories related to the challenges experienced with the health care system for patients with leukodystrophy and their families; and iii) coordinating family functions to accept and cope with the disease, which included categories related to family psychological difficulties and role divisions within the family. According to the ConQual criteria, the second synthesized finding had a low confidence level, and the first and third synthesized findings had a very low confidence level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The synthesized findings of this review provide evidence on the experiences of patients with metachromatic leukodystrophy or adrenoleukodystrophy and their families. These findings indicate that there are challenges in managing a patient's physical condition and coordinating the health care system and
{"title":"Experiences of patients with metachromatic leukodystrophy, adrenoleukodystrophy, or Krabbe disease and the experiences of their family members: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Yuta Koto, Shingo Ueki, Miyae Yamakawa, Norio Sakai","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00303","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to synthesize the experiences of patients with metachromatic leukodystrophy, adrenoleukodystrophy, or Krabbe disease and the experiences of their families.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Leukodystrophies are metabolic diseases caused by genetic mutations. There are multiple forms of the disease, varying in age of onset and symptoms. The progression of leukodystrophies worsens central nervous system symptoms and significantly affects the lives of patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Qualitative studies on the experiences of patients with leukodystrophies and their family members were included. These experiences included treatments such as enzyme replacement therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; effects of tracheostomy and gastrostomy; burdens on the family, coordinating care within the health care system, and family planning due to genetic disorders. This review considered studies in any setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Plus (EBSCOhost), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and MedNar databases were searched on November 18, 2022. Study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis were conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence, and synthesized findings were evaluated according to the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies were eligible for synthesis, and 45 findings were extracted corresponding with participants' voices. Of these findings, 40 were unequivocal and 5 were credible. The diseases in the included studies were metachromatic leukodystrophy and adrenoleukodystrophy; no studies were identified for patients with Krabbe disease and their families. These findings were grouped into 11 categories and integrated into 3 synthesized findings, including i) providing care by family members and health care providers as physical symptoms progress, which relates to the effects of the characteristics of progressive leukodystrophies; ii) building medical teamwork to provide appropriate support services, comprising categories related to the challenges experienced with the health care system for patients with leukodystrophy and their families; and iii) coordinating family functions to accept and cope with the disease, which included categories related to family psychological difficulties and role divisions within the family. According to the ConQual criteria, the second synthesized finding had a low confidence level, and the first and third synthesized findings had a very low confidence level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The synthesized findings of this review provide evidence on the experiences of patients with metachromatic leukodystrophy or adrenoleukodystrophy and their families. These findings indicate that there are challenges in managing a patient's physical condition and coordinating the health care system and ","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1262-1302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230659/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140294797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hien Thi Ho, Romy Jia, Nahal Habibi, Cindy Stern, Gillian Carter, Olinda Santin, Jennifer Stone, Chelsea Valenzuela, Edoardo Aromataris
Objective: This review aims to synthesize the experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Introduction: Globally, the burden of dementia is increasing disproportionately in LMICs. Informal caregivers play a vital role and face multiple challenges in LMICs, even though they also often lack the awareness and skills to provide adequate care for people living with dementia. Many LMICs have limited resources and caregivers lack support services. Understanding their experiences and perceptions may improve interventions, helping caregivers to better support those living with dementia.
Inclusion criteria: Studies from all settings in LMICs will be considered. Qualitative data from qualitative or mixed methods studies that explore caregivers' experiences and perceptions will be included in this review. Participants are informal caregivers of people diagnosed with dementia at any stage, regardless of age, gender, or their relationship with people living with dementia.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for a qualitative systematic reviews, with meta-aggregation as the synthesis method. The review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A 3-step search strategy will be used to locate published and unpublished studies in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, AgeLine, LILACS, African Index Medicus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Open Dissertations, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. There will be no date or language limitations. All studies will be screened against the inclusion criteria and data will be extracted and critically appraised for methodological quality by 2 independent reviewers using JBI tools. Confidence in the final synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach.
Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023453814.
目的本综述旨在总结中低收入国家（LMICs）痴呆症患者非正规照顾者的经验：在全球范围内，痴呆症给低收入和中等收入国家造成的负担与日俱增。非正规照护者在低收入和中等收入国家发挥着重要作用，同时也面临着多重挑战。照护者往往缺乏为痴呆症患者提供适当照护的意识和技能。许多低收入和中等收入国家的资源有限，护理者缺乏支持服务。了解他们的经历和看法可以改进干预措施，帮助护理人员更好地为痴呆症患者提供支持：将考虑来自低收入和中等收入国家所有环境的研究。本综述将包括来自定性或混合方法研究的定性数据，这些数据将探讨照护者的经验和看法。参与者为任何阶段被诊断为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者，无论其年龄、性别或与痴呆症患者的关系如何：本综述将遵循 JBI 的定性系统综述方法，以元聚合作为综合方法。本综述将按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》（PRISMA）指南进行报告。将采用三步检索策略，在 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、AgeLine、LILACS、African Index Medicus、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses、Open Dissertations、Web of Science Core Collection 和 Google Scholar 中查找已发表和未发表的研究。没有日期或语言限制。所有研究都将根据纳入标准进行筛选，数据将由两名独立审稿人使用 JBI 工具提取并严格评估方法学质量。将使用 ConQual 方法对最终综合结果的可信度进行评估：综述注册号：PREMCORD42023453814。
{"title":"Experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Hien Thi Ho, Romy Jia, Nahal Habibi, Cindy Stern, Gillian Carter, Olinda Santin, Jennifer Stone, Chelsea Valenzuela, Edoardo Aromataris","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00470","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to synthesize the experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Globally, the burden of dementia is increasing disproportionately in LMICs. Informal caregivers play a vital role and face multiple challenges in LMICs, even though they also often lack the awareness and skills to provide adequate care for people living with dementia. Many LMICs have limited resources and caregivers lack support services. Understanding their experiences and perceptions may improve interventions, helping caregivers to better support those living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies from all settings in LMICs will be considered. Qualitative data from qualitative or mixed methods studies that explore caregivers' experiences and perceptions will be included in this review. Participants are informal caregivers of people diagnosed with dementia at any stage, regardless of age, gender, or their relationship with people living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for a qualitative systematic reviews, with meta-aggregation as the synthesis method. The review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A 3-step search strategy will be used to locate published and unpublished studies in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, AgeLine, LILACS, African Index Medicus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Open Dissertations, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. There will be no date or language limitations. All studies will be screened against the inclusion criteria and data will be extracted and critically appraised for methodological quality by 2 independent reviewers using JBI tools. Confidence in the final synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023453814.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1362-1370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140111684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: This review will map the various methodological approaches used in graded dental ceramics and distinguish their material characteristics and properties. The aim is to identify gaps in the development and application of grading in dental ceramic systems.
Introduction: The advantage of functionally graded materials is the absence of the weakest link, with no distinct boundaries, thereby eliminating the possibility of stress concentrations at the interfaces. Functionally graded materials are well established in nature, such as in human teeth, bone, and the bio-tissues of plants and animals. This concept has also been explored in dental ceramics to enhance fatigue resistance and strength.
Inclusion criteria: This review will include observational studies and interventional studies, such as in vitro and experimental studies, on functionally graded dental ceramic systems. Studies that use finite element analysis to evaluate stress distributions, and studies on the mechanical performance of graded dental ceramics, irrespective of the type of ceramic material, design, or thickness of graded layers, will be considered.
Method: The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (EBSCOhost), Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar will be searched for English language studies. The search strategy will be based on MeSH terms and free-text specific terms, and will be adapted for each database. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, and extract data from selected sources. The data extracted from the selected studies will be analyzed and presented in the form of tables and figures.
Review registration: Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/ahsp7.
目的：本综述将介绍用于分级牙科陶瓷的各种方法，并区分其材料特性和属性。目的是找出牙科陶瓷系统分级开发和应用方面的差距：功能分级材料的优点是没有最薄弱的环节，没有明显的边界，从而消除了界面应力集中的可能性。功能分级材料在自然界中已得到广泛应用，如人类的牙齿、骨骼以及动植物的生物组织。这一概念在牙科陶瓷中也得到了探索，以提高抗疲劳性和强度：本综述将包括关于功能分级牙科陶瓷系统的观察性研究和干预性研究，如体外研究和实验研究。使用有限元分析评估应力分布的研究，以及关于分级牙科陶瓷机械性能的研究，无论陶瓷材料类型、设计或分级层厚度如何，都将被考虑在内：综述将遵循 JBI 的范围界定综述方法和范围界定综述的系统综述和元分析首选报告项。将检索 MEDLINE (PubMed)、Scopus、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (EBSCOhost)、Cochrane CENTRAL 和 Google Scholar 中的英文研究。检索策略将以 MeSH 术语和自由文本特定术语为基础，并针对每个数据库进行调整。两名独立审稿人将筛选标题和摘要，并从选定的来源中提取数据。从所选研究中提取的数据将进行分析，并以图表的形式呈现：开放科学框架：https://osf.io/ahsp7。
{"title":"Methodological approaches in graded dental ceramics: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Sivaranjani Gali, Suhasini Gururaja, Vineetha Karuveettil, Chandrashekhar Janakiram","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00143","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review will map the various methodological approaches used in graded dental ceramics and distinguish their material characteristics and properties. The aim is to identify gaps in the development and application of grading in dental ceramic systems.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The advantage of functionally graded materials is the absence of the weakest link, with no distinct boundaries, thereby eliminating the possibility of stress concentrations at the interfaces. Functionally graded materials are well established in nature, such as in human teeth, bone, and the bio-tissues of plants and animals. This concept has also been explored in dental ceramics to enhance fatigue resistance and strength.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include observational studies and interventional studies, such as in vitro and experimental studies, on functionally graded dental ceramic systems. Studies that use finite element analysis to evaluate stress distributions, and studies on the mechanical performance of graded dental ceramics, irrespective of the type of ceramic material, design, or thickness of graded layers, will be considered.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (EBSCOhost), Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar will be searched for English language studies. The search strategy will be based on MeSH terms and free-text specific terms, and will be adapted for each database. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, and extract data from selected sources. The data extracted from the selected studies will be analyzed and presented in the form of tables and figures.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/ahsp7.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"22 7","pages":"1387-1392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616240/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141564718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Louise M W Mathiesen, Bettan Bagger, Ditte Høgsgaard, Martine V Nielsen, Sissel S Gjedsig, Mai-Britt Hägi-Pedersen
Introduction: Digital solutions, telemedicine, and technologies are increasingly becoming a part of the health system, requiring current and future health professionals to master skills in these domains.
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to explore, report, and map the evidence on education and training programs for current and future health professionals' competence in virtual consultations.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider any studies on education and training programs designed to optimize current and future health professionals' competence in virtual consultations in any setting, such as faculties, universities, university colleges, hospitals, or community locations.
Methods: This review will be guided by the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished sources of information will be searched for in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), and Scopus. Studies written in English, German, Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian will be considered, with no geographical or cultural limitations. Two independent reviewers will screen retrieved papers, and a standardized tool will be used to extract data from each included source. The results of the extracted data will be presented in tabular format, together with a narrative summary of the evidence.
Details of the review can be found in open science framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BSMUY.
{"title":"Education and training programs for health professionals' competence in virtual consultations: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Louise M W Mathiesen, Bettan Bagger, Ditte Høgsgaard, Martine V Nielsen, Sissel S Gjedsig, Mai-Britt Hägi-Pedersen","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00285","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital solutions, telemedicine, and technologies are increasingly becoming a part of the health system, requiring current and future health professionals to master skills in these domains.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to explore, report, and map the evidence on education and training programs for current and future health professionals' competence in virtual consultations.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider any studies on education and training programs designed to optimize current and future health professionals' competence in virtual consultations in any setting, such as faculties, universities, university colleges, hospitals, or community locations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be guided by the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished sources of information will be searched for in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), and Scopus. Studies written in English, German, Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian will be considered, with no geographical or cultural limitations. Two independent reviewers will screen retrieved papers, and a standardized tool will be used to extract data from each included source. The results of the extracted data will be presented in tabular format, together with a narrative summary of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Details of the review can be found in open science framework: </strong>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BSMUY.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James Stewart-Evans, Emma Wilson, Tessa Langley, Angela Hands, Jo Leonardi-Bee
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to review the body of knowledge on net gain and no net loss (net-outcome) objectives and approaches applicable to health in spatial planning and development policies and practice.
Introduction: There is an established body of academic and gray literature addressing environmental net-outcome objectives, such as biodiversity net gain, in spatial planning policies and practice. A "health net gain" objective has recently been proposed as a driver for health protection and the realization of health. Such an objective and approach are yet to be scoped and defined.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider sources in the scientific and gray literature that describe health net-outcome objectives that can be implemented in spatial planning and development policies and practice. Source contexts will not be limited to specific countries, geographical areas, or settings. All types of evidence will be considered.
Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched include PsycINFO (APA), Embase, HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, and selected databases from the ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection. Sources of gray literature to be searched include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, TRIP Pro, and BASE. No language or date restrictions will be applied. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and review full-text studies and extract data. The results will be presented in tabular or diagrammatic format with a narrative summary.
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/4dbcm.
目标：本范围界定综述旨在回顾有关净收益和无净损失（净结果）目标的知识体系，以及适用于空间规划与发展政策和实践中健康问题的方法：在空间规划政策和实践中，已有大量学术和灰色文献涉及环境净收益目标，如生物多样性净收益。最近提出了 "健康净收益 "目标，作为保护健康和实现健康的驱动力。这种目标和方法的范围和定义尚待确定：本综述将考虑科学和灰色文献中描述可在空间规划和发展政策与实践中实施的健康净收益目标的来源。来源背景将不限于特定国家、地理区域或环境。方法：本综述将采用 JBI 的方法进行范围界定综述。要检索的数据库包括 PsycINFO (APA)、Embase、HMIC Health Management Information Consortium、MEDLINE (Ovid)、Scopus 以及 ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection 中的部分数据库。要检索的灰色文献来源包括 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses、TRIP Pro 和 BASE。检索不受语言或日期限制。两名独立审稿人将检索和审阅研究报告全文并提取数据。结果将以表格或图表的形式呈现，并附有叙述性摘要：开放科学框架 https://osf.io/4dbcm。
{"title":"Health net-outcome objectives and approaches for spatial planning and development: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"James Stewart-Evans, Emma Wilson, Tessa Langley, Angela Hands, Jo Leonardi-Bee","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00464","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00464","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to review the body of knowledge on net gain and no net loss (net-outcome) objectives and approaches applicable to health in spatial planning and development policies and practice.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an established body of academic and gray literature addressing environmental net-outcome objectives, such as biodiversity net gain, in spatial planning policies and practice. A \"health net gain\" objective has recently been proposed as a driver for health protection and the realization of health. Such an objective and approach are yet to be scoped and defined.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider sources in the scientific and gray literature that describe health net-outcome objectives that can be implemented in spatial planning and development policies and practice. Source contexts will not be limited to specific countries, geographical areas, or settings. All types of evidence will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched include PsycINFO (APA), Embase, HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, and selected databases from the ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection. Sources of gray literature to be searched include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, TRIP Pro, and BASE. No language or date restrictions will be applied. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and review full-text studies and extract data. The results will be presented in tabular or diagrammatic format with a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/4dbcm.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554248/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rose McCloskey, Patricia Morris, Lisa Keeping-Burke, Alex Goudreau, Alexa McGill, Holly Knight, Sarah Buckely, David Mazerolle, Courtney Jones
Objective: The objective of this review is to map the existing literature on pedagogical approaches and teaching strategies used to teach academic and professional writing to pre-licensure students who are enrolled in health professional programs.
Introduction: Health professional programs are intended to develop competence in both academic and professional writing. Effective academic writing skills prompt critical reflection and engagement with research communities, while professional writing skills are used to document interventions and communicate across health systems. Despite the importance of these 2 forms of writing, there are ongoing concerns that practitioners are entering practice without adequate writing skills. Given these concerns and the importance of writing across health disciplines, there is value in identifying the pedagogical strategies and approaches used in health professional programs to develop writing skills and to transfer such skills from one communicative context to another.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider research on the pedagogical approaches and teaching strategies used to teach academic and professional writing in pre-licensure health professional programs.
Methods: This review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will aim to locate published literature using MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL with Full-Text (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health (ProQuest), and ERIC (EBSCOhost), along with gray literature (using databases/search engines). Papers published from 2010 onward in English and in French will be included. Extracted data will be reported in tabular format and presented narratively to address each review objective.
Details of the review can be found in open science framework: http://osf.io/9raxp.
目标：本综述的目的是对现有文献进行梳理，以了解用于教授注册卫生专业课程的执照前学生学术和专业写作的教学方法和教学策略：卫生专业课程旨在培养学生的学术和专业写作能力。有效的学术写作技巧能促进批判性反思和与研究团体的接触，而专业写作技巧则用于记录干预措施和跨卫生系统交流。尽管这两种形式的写作都很重要，但人们一直担心从业人员在没有掌握足够的写作技巧的情况下进入实践。鉴于这些担忧以及写作在各卫生学科中的重要性，确定卫生专业课程中用于培养写作技能以及将这些技能从一种交流环境转移到另一种交流环境的教学策略和方法是有价值的：本综述将考虑有关在执照前卫生专业课程中教授学术和专业写作的教学方法和教学策略的研究：本综述将按照 JBI 的范围界定综述方法进行。检索策略旨在使用 MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase、CINAHL with Full-Text (EBSCOhost)、ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health (ProQuest) 和 ERIC (EBSCOhost) 以及灰色文献（使用数据库/搜索引擎）查找已发表的文献。将收录 2010 年以后发表的英文和法文论文。提取的数据将以表格的形式报告，并针对每个综述目标进行叙述性陈述。综述的详细信息请参见开放科学框架：http://osf.io/9raxp。
{"title":"Pedagogical and teaching strategies used to teach writing to pre-licensure students enrolled in health professional programs: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Rose McCloskey, Patricia Morris, Lisa Keeping-Burke, Alex Goudreau, Alexa McGill, Holly Knight, Sarah Buckely, David Mazerolle, Courtney Jones","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to map the existing literature on pedagogical approaches and teaching strategies used to teach academic and professional writing to pre-licensure students who are enrolled in health professional programs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health professional programs are intended to develop competence in both academic and professional writing. Effective academic writing skills prompt critical reflection and engagement with research communities, while professional writing skills are used to document interventions and communicate across health systems. Despite the importance of these 2 forms of writing, there are ongoing concerns that practitioners are entering practice without adequate writing skills. Given these concerns and the importance of writing across health disciplines, there is value in identifying the pedagogical strategies and approaches used in health professional programs to develop writing skills and to transfer such skills from one communicative context to another.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider research on the pedagogical approaches and teaching strategies used to teach academic and professional writing in pre-licensure health professional programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will aim to locate published literature using MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL with Full-Text (EBSCOhost), ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health (ProQuest), and ERIC (EBSCOhost), along with gray literature (using databases/search engines). Papers published from 2010 onward in English and in French will be included. Extracted data will be reported in tabular format and presented narratively to address each review objective.</p><p><strong>Details of the review can be found in open science framework: </strong>http://osf.io/9raxp.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141332024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Poppy Jackson, Alison Luke, Alex Goudreau, Shelley Doucet
Objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize the existing literature on how theater has been used as a knowledge translation approach for health research and to identify the outcome measures employed for evaluation as well as the facilitators/challenges related to this approach.
Introduction: The use of arts-based knowledge translation methods is relatively new in health research but has already shown to have positive impacts on knowledge, attitudes, policy, and practice. Specifically, theater has proven to be an effective approach for communicating research findings in a way that stimulates thought and discussion on important health-related topics.
Inclusion criteria: This review will include scholarly literature on how theater is being used as a knowledge translation approach for health research. The review will not impose any limitations related to demographic variables, health issues, or settings. The review will consider papers using any study design, and will also consider other literature, such as protocols, descriptive papers, unpublished papers, and evaluation reports.
Methods: This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The databases to be searched will include CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Academic Search Premier (EBSCOhost), and Scopus. Google/Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses will also be searched for unpublished studies and gray literature. All literature identified in the search will be screened by 2 independent reviewers and the results will be presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. The data extracted from the included literature will be presented in both tabular and narrative format.
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/gbcpj.
目的：本综述旨在综合现有文献，探讨如何将戏剧作为一种知识转化方法用于健康研究，并确定用于评估的结果衡量标准以及与这种方法相关的促进因素/挑战：在健康研究中使用以艺术为基础的知识转化方法相对较新，但已显示出对知识、态度、政策和实践的积极影响。具体而言，戏剧已被证明是一种有效的方法，它能以激发思考和讨论重要健康相关主题的方式传达研究成果：本综述将包括有关如何将戏剧用作健康研究的知识转化方法的学术文献。本综述不会对人口统计学变量、健康问题或环境施加任何限制。综述将考虑采用任何研究设计的论文，也将考虑其他文献，如协议、描述性论文、未发表的论文和评估报告：本综述将按照 JBI 的范围界定综述方法进行。将检索的数据库包括 CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Embase、MEDLINE (Ovid)、Academic Search Premier (EBSCOhost) 和 Scopus。Google/Google Scholar 和 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses 也将用于检索未发表的研究报告和灰色文献。搜索中发现的所有文献将由两名独立审稿人进行筛选，筛选结果将以系统综述和元分析首选报告项目（PRISMA）流程图的形式呈现。从纳入的文献中提取的数据将以表格和叙述的形式呈现。本协议已在开放科学框架上注册：https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GBCPJ。
{"title":"Using theater as an innovative knowledge translation approach for health research: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Poppy Jackson, Alison Luke, Alex Goudreau, Shelley Doucet","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00312","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to synthesize the existing literature on how theater has been used as a knowledge translation approach for health research and to identify the outcome measures employed for evaluation as well as the facilitators/challenges related to this approach.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of arts-based knowledge translation methods is relatively new in health research but has already shown to have positive impacts on knowledge, attitudes, policy, and practice. Specifically, theater has proven to be an effective approach for communicating research findings in a way that stimulates thought and discussion on important health-related topics.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include scholarly literature on how theater is being used as a knowledge translation approach for health research. The review will not impose any limitations related to demographic variables, health issues, or settings. The review will consider papers using any study design, and will also consider other literature, such as protocols, descriptive papers, unpublished papers, and evaluation reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The databases to be searched will include CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Academic Search Premier (EBSCOhost), and Scopus. Google/Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses will also be searched for unpublished studies and gray literature. All literature identified in the search will be screened by 2 independent reviewers and the results will be presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. The data extracted from the included literature will be presented in both tabular and narrative format.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/gbcpj.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1197-1204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139576764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the cost-effectiveness of targeted/selective newborn screening compared with universal screening for sickle cell disease across various countries and settings.
Introduction: The incidence of sickle cell disease is a widespread and potentially fatal hematologic disorder that affects thousands of newborns worldwide. The cost of newborn screening creates a burden on households and the economy.
Inclusion criteria: Studies will be eligible for inclusion in the review if they focus on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for sickle cell disease, comparing targeted/selective screening with universal screening.
Methods: A preliminary search of MEDLINE (PubMed) was undertaken using MeSH terms, such as sickle cell disease, newborn , and economic evaluations . Two reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts, and full text independently against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion or with a third reviewer. To assess methodological quality, the JBI checklist for economic evaluation will be used. Data will be extracted by 2 reviewers using a modified JBI data extraction form. The JBI dominance ranking matrix for economic evaluations will be used to summarize and compare the results. Cost-effectiveness will be measured on the basis of cost per test/case detected, quality-adjusted life years gained, or disability-adjusted life years averted. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment will be conducted to evaluate the certainty of economic evidence, such as use of resources and expenditures, and to incorporate the results into the decision-making process.
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for sickle cell disease: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Biswajit Mahapatra, Nirmalya Mukherjee, Sajda Khatoon, Paramita Bhattacharya, Edakashwa Thubru, Denny John","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00302","DOIUrl":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the cost-effectiveness of targeted/selective newborn screening compared with universal screening for sickle cell disease across various countries and settings.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of sickle cell disease is a widespread and potentially fatal hematologic disorder that affects thousands of newborns worldwide. The cost of newborn screening creates a burden on households and the economy.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies will be eligible for inclusion in the review if they focus on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for sickle cell disease, comparing targeted/selective screening with universal screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preliminary search of MEDLINE (PubMed) was undertaken using MeSH terms, such as sickle cell disease, newborn , and economic evaluations . Two reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts, and full text independently against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion or with a third reviewer. To assess methodological quality, the JBI checklist for economic evaluation will be used. Data will be extracted by 2 reviewers using a modified JBI data extraction form. The JBI dominance ranking matrix for economic evaluations will be used to summarize and compare the results. Cost-effectiveness will be measured on the basis of cost per test/case detected, quality-adjusted life years gained, or disability-adjusted life years averted. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment will be conducted to evaluate the certainty of economic evidence, such as use of resources and expenditures, and to incorporate the results into the decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42017057963.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1143-1150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139576787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号