首页 > 最新文献

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Artificial intelligence-generated targets and inter-observer variation in online adaptive radiotherapy of bladder cancer 人工智能生成的目标和膀胱癌在线自适应放疗中观察者之间的差异
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100640
Lina M. Åström , Patrik Sibolt , Hannah Chamberlin , Eva Serup-Hansen , Claus E. Andersen , Marcel van Herk , Lene S. Mouritsen , Marianne C. Aznar , Claus P. Behrens

Background and purpose

Daily target re-delineation in online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) introduces uncertainty. The aim of this study was to evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) generated contours and inter-observer target variation among radiotherapy technicians in cone-beam CT (CBCT) guided oART of bladder cancer.

Materials and methods

For each of 10 consecutive patients treated with oART for bladder cancer, one CBCT was randomly selected and retrospectively included. The bladder (CTV-T) was AI-segmented (CTV-TAI). Seven radiotherapy technicians independently reviewed and edited CTV-TAI, generating CTV-TADP. Contours were benchmarked against a ground truth contour (CTV-TGT) delineated blindly from scratch. CTV-TADP and CTV-TAI were compared to CTV-TGT using volume, dice similarity coefficient, and bidirectional local distance. Dose coverage (D99%>95 %) of CTV-TGT was evaluated for treatment plans optimized for CTV-TAI and CTV-TADP with clinical margins. Inter-observer variation among CTV-TADP was assessed using coefficient of variation and generalized conformity index.

Results

CTV-TGT ranged from 48.7 cm3 to 211.6 cm3. The median [range] volume difference was 4.5 [−17.8, 42.4] cm3 for CTV-TADP and −15.5 [−54.2, 4.3] cm3 for CTV-TAI, compared to CTV-TGT. Corresponding dice similarity coefficients were 0.87 [0.71, 0.95] and 0.84 [0.64, 0.95]. CTV-TGT was adequately covered in 68/70 plans optimized on CTV-TADP and in 6/10 plans optimized on CTV-TAI with clinical margins. The median [range] coefficient of variation was 0.08 [0.05, 0.11] and generalized conformity index was 0.78 [0.71, 0.88] among CTV-TADP.

Conclusions

Target re-delineation in CBCT-guided oART of bladder cancer demonstrated non-isotropic inter-observer variation. Manual adjustment of AI-generated contours was necessary to cover ground truth targets.

背景和目的在线自适应放射治疗(oART)中的每日目标重新划定会带来不确定性。本研究旨在评估人工智能(AI)生成的轮廓和锥束 CT(CBCT)引导的膀胱癌 oART 中放疗技术人员之间的目标差异。膀胱(CTV-T)进行了AI分割(CTV-TAI)。七名放射治疗技术人员独立审查和编辑 CTV-TAI,生成 CTV-TADP。等值线以从头开始盲目划定的地面真实等值线(CTV-TGT)为基准。使用体积、骰子相似系数和双向局部距离将 CTV-TADP 和 CTV-TAI 与 CTV-TGT 进行比较。针对临床边缘为 CTV-TAI 和 CTV-TADP 优化的治疗方案,评估了 CTV-TGT 的剂量覆盖率(D99%>95%)。使用变异系数和广义符合性指数评估了 CTV-TADP 的观察者间差异。与CTV-TGT相比,CTV-TADP和CTV-TAI的体积差异中位数[范围]分别为4.5 [-17.8, 42.4] cm3和-15.5 [-54.2, 4.3] cm3。相应的骰子相似系数分别为 0.87 [0.71, 0.95] 和 0.84 [0.64, 0.95]。在 68/70 个根据 CTV-TADP 优化的计划和 6/10 个根据 CTV-TAI 优化的计划中,CTV-TGT 被充分覆盖,并有临床边缘。CTV-TADP的中位[范围]变异系数为0.08 [0.05, 0.11],广义符合性指数为0.78 [0.71, 0.88]。有必要对人工智能生成的轮廓进行手动调整,以覆盖地面实况目标。
{"title":"Artificial intelligence-generated targets and inter-observer variation in online adaptive radiotherapy of bladder cancer","authors":"Lina M. Åström ,&nbsp;Patrik Sibolt ,&nbsp;Hannah Chamberlin ,&nbsp;Eva Serup-Hansen ,&nbsp;Claus E. Andersen ,&nbsp;Marcel van Herk ,&nbsp;Lene S. Mouritsen ,&nbsp;Marianne C. Aznar ,&nbsp;Claus P. Behrens","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100640","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100640","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Daily target re-delineation in online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) introduces uncertainty. The aim of this study was to evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) generated contours and inter-observer target variation among radiotherapy technicians in cone-beam CT (CBCT) guided oART of bladder cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>For each of 10 consecutive patients treated with oART for bladder cancer, one CBCT was randomly selected and retrospectively included. The bladder (CTV-T) was AI-segmented (CTV-T<sub>AI</sub>). Seven radiotherapy technicians independently reviewed and edited CTV-T<sub>AI</sub>, generating CTV-T<sub>ADP</sub>. Contours were benchmarked against a ground truth contour (CTV-T<sub>GT</sub>) delineated blindly from scratch. CTV-T<sub>ADP</sub> and CTV-T<sub>AI</sub> were compared to CTV-T<sub>GT</sub> using volume, dice similarity coefficient, and bidirectional local distance. Dose coverage (D<sub>99%</sub>&gt;95 %) of CTV-T<sub>GT</sub> was evaluated for treatment plans optimized for CTV-T<sub>AI</sub> and CTV-T<sub>ADP</sub> with clinical margins. Inter-observer variation among CTV-T<sub>ADP</sub> was assessed using coefficient of variation and generalized conformity index.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CTV-T<sub>GT</sub> ranged from 48.7 cm<sup>3</sup> to 211.6 cm<sup>3</sup>. The median [range] volume difference was 4.5 [−17.8, 42.4] cm<sup>3</sup> for CTV-T<sub>ADP</sub> and −15.5 [−54.2, 4.3] cm<sup>3</sup> for CTV-T<sub>AI</sub>, compared to CTV-T<sub>GT</sub>. Corresponding dice similarity coefficients were 0.87 [0.71, 0.95] and 0.84 [0.64, 0.95]. CTV-T<sub>GT</sub> was adequately covered in 68/70 plans optimized on CTV-T<sub>ADP</sub> and in 6/10 plans optimized on CTV-T<sub>AI</sub> with clinical margins. The median [range] coefficient of variation was 0.08 [0.05, 0.11] and generalized conformity index was 0.78 [0.71, 0.88] among CTV-T<sub>ADP</sub>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Target re-delineation in CBCT-guided oART of bladder cancer demonstrated non-isotropic inter-observer variation. Manual adjustment of AI-generated contours was necessary to cover ground truth targets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001106/pdfft?md5=65ea09c6823d780c0e3cf276f0b90698&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001106-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142136831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging derived synthetic computed tomography for proton therapy planning in prostate cancer 用于前列腺癌质子治疗规划的磁共振成像衍生合成计算机断层扫描评估
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100625
Kajsa M.L. Fridström , René M. Winter , Natalie Hornik , Sigrun S. Almberg , Signe Danielsen , Kathrine R. Redalen

Background and purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only workflow is used in photon radiotherapy (RT) today, but not yet for protons. To bring MRI-only proton RT into clinical use, proton dose calculation on MRI-derived synthetic CT (sCT) must be validated. We evaluated proton dose calculation accuracy of prostate cancer proton plans using a commercially available sCT generator already validated for photon planning.

Materials and methods

The retrospective planning study included 10 prostate cancer patients who underwent MRI and planning CT (pCT) before RT. sCT were generated from the MRI with MRI Planner v2.3, and compared to pCT using structural mean absolute error (MAE). The pCT was used to create one-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plan and two-field intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) proton plan. Each plan was recalculated on the sCT and compared to pCT doses. Dose volume histogram parameters, gamma analyses and range differences were evaluated.

Results

Median MAE for the body contour was 71 HU. Dose differences between pCT and sCT were small and similar for VMAT and IMPT plans. Median (range) gamma pass rates were lower for IMPT plans with 95.8 (89.3–98.7) % compared to VMAT plans with 99.4 (91.2–99.6) %. The proton range difference was 1.0 (interquartile range –0.1 – 0.2) mm deeper for sCT compared to the reference.

Conclusion

MRI-only IMPT planning for prostate cancer seems feasible in a clinical setting for the evaluated beam arrangement and sCT generator. More patients and evaluation of other beam arrangements are needed for a more general conclusion.

背景和目的目前,光子放射治疗(RT)中使用了仅磁共振成像(MRI)的工作流程,但质子放射治疗尚未使用。要将只使用磁共振成像的质子 RT 应用于临床,必须对磁共振成像衍生的合成 CT(sCT)上的质子剂量计算进行验证。我们评估了前列腺癌质子计划的质子剂量计算准确性,使用的是已通过光子计划验证的市售 sCT 生成器。pCT 用于创建单弧形容积调制弧治疗(VMAT)光子计划和双场强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)质子计划。每个计划都在 sCT 上重新计算,并与 pCT 剂量进行比较。对剂量体积直方图参数、伽马分析和范围差异进行了评估。pCT 和 sCT 的剂量差异很小,VMAT 和 IMPT 计划的剂量差异相似。IMPT计划的伽马通过率中值(范围)为95.8(89.3-98.7)%,低于VMAT计划的99.4(91.2-99.6)%。与参考相比,sCT 的质子射程相差 1.0(四分位间范围 -0.1 - 0.2)毫米。要得出更全面的结论,还需要对更多患者和其他射束排列进行评估。
{"title":"Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging derived synthetic computed tomography for proton therapy planning in prostate cancer","authors":"Kajsa M.L. Fridström ,&nbsp;René M. Winter ,&nbsp;Natalie Hornik ,&nbsp;Sigrun S. Almberg ,&nbsp;Signe Danielsen ,&nbsp;Kathrine R. Redalen","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100625","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100625","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only workflow is used in photon radiotherapy (RT) today, but not yet for protons. To bring MRI-only proton RT into clinical use, proton dose calculation on MRI-derived synthetic CT (sCT) must be validated. We evaluated proton dose calculation accuracy of prostate cancer proton plans using a commercially available sCT generator already validated for photon planning.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The retrospective planning study included 10 prostate cancer patients who underwent MRI and planning CT (pCT) before RT. sCT were generated from the MRI with MRI Planner v2.3, and compared to pCT using structural mean absolute error (MAE). The pCT was used to create one-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plan and two-field intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) proton plan. Each plan was recalculated on the sCT and compared to pCT doses. Dose volume histogram parameters, gamma analyses and range differences were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median MAE for the body contour was 71 HU. Dose differences between pCT and sCT were small and similar for VMAT and IMPT plans. Median (range) gamma pass rates were lower for IMPT plans with 95.8 (89.3–98.7) % compared to VMAT plans with 99.4 (91.2–99.6) %. The proton range difference was 1.0 (interquartile range –0.1 – 0.2) mm deeper for sCT compared to the reference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MRI-only IMPT planning for prostate cancer seems feasible in a clinical setting for the evaluated beam arrangement and sCT generator. More patients and evaluation of other beam arrangements are needed for a more general conclusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000952/pdfft?md5=bdff56b24bab3515231eb6ae2a486b75&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000952-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141993841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of image registration methods in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer treated with superficial brachytherapy 浅层近距离放射治疗非黑色素瘤皮肤癌患者的图像配准方法比较
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100631
Marta Szlag, Magdalena Stankiewicz, Sylwia Kellas-Ślęczka, Małgorzata Stąpór-Fudzińska, Agnieszka Cholewka, Agnieszka Pruefer, Piotr Wojcieszek

The accumulated dose from sequential treatments of metachronous non-melanoma skin cancer can be assessed using image registration, although guidelines for selecting the appropriate algorithm are lacking. This study shows the impact of rigid (RIR), deformable (DIR) and deformable structure-based (SDIR) algorithms on the skin dose. DIR increased: the maximum dose (39.2 Gy vs 9.4 Gy), the dose to 0.1 cm3 (16.4 Gy vs 7.8 Gy) and the dose to 2 cm3 (7.6 Gy vs 5.7 Gy). RIR only affected the maximum dose, which increased to 17.0 Gy. SDIR correctly translated the dose maps, as none of the parameters changed significantly.

对非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的连续治疗所产生的累积剂量可通过图像配准进行评估,但目前还缺乏选择合适算法的指南。本研究显示了刚性算法(RIR)、可变形算法(DIR)和基于可变形结构的算法(SDIR)对皮肤剂量的影响。DIR 增加了:最大剂量(39.2 Gy vs 9.4 Gy)、0.1 cm3 剂量(16.4 Gy vs 7.8 Gy)和 2 cm3 剂量(7.6 Gy vs 5.7 Gy)。RIR 只影响最大剂量,最大剂量增加到 17.0 Gy。SDIR 正确地转换了剂量图,因为所有参数都没有显著变化。
{"title":"Comparison of image registration methods in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer treated with superficial brachytherapy","authors":"Marta Szlag,&nbsp;Magdalena Stankiewicz,&nbsp;Sylwia Kellas-Ślęczka,&nbsp;Małgorzata Stąpór-Fudzińska,&nbsp;Agnieszka Cholewka,&nbsp;Agnieszka Pruefer,&nbsp;Piotr Wojcieszek","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100631","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100631","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The accumulated dose from sequential treatments of metachronous non-melanoma skin cancer can be assessed using image registration, although guidelines for selecting the appropriate algorithm are lacking. This study shows the impact of rigid (RIR), deformable (DIR) and deformable structure-based (SDIR) algorithms on the skin dose. DIR increased: the maximum dose (39.2 Gy vs 9.4 Gy), the dose to 0.1 cm<sup>3</sup> (16.4 Gy vs 7.8 Gy) and the dose to 2 cm<sup>3</sup> (7.6 Gy vs 5.7 Gy). RIR only affected the maximum dose, which increased to 17.0 Gy. SDIR correctly translated the dose maps, as none of the parameters changed significantly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001015/pdfft?md5=f9df898248b65fa6251a71bb25161eb4&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001015-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142039670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Histopathology-validated gross tumor volume delineations of intraprostatic lesions using PSMA-positron emission tomography/multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging 利用 PSMA 正电子发射断层扫描/多参数磁共振成像技术对前列腺内病变进行组织病理学验证的肿瘤体积划分
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100633
Josefine Grefve , Karin Söderkvist , Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson , Kristina Sandgren , Joakim Jonsson , Angsana Keeratijarut Lindberg , Erik Nilsson , Jan Axelsson , Anders Bergh , Björn Zackrisson , Mathieu Moreau , Camilla Thellenberg Karlsson , Lars.E. Olsson , Anders Widmark , Katrine Riklund , Lennart Blomqvist , Vibeke Berg Loegager , Sara N. Strandberg , Tufve Nyholm

Background and purpose

Dose escalation in external radiotherapy of prostate cancer shows promising results in terms of biochemical disease-free survival. Boost volume delineation guidelines are sparse which may cause high interobserver variability. The aim of this research was to characterize gross tumor volume (GTV) delineations based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) in relation to histopathology-validated Gleason grade 4 and 5 regions.

Material and methods

The study participants were examined with [68Ga]PSMA-PET/mpMRI prior to radical prostatectomy. Four radiation oncologists delineated GTVs in 15 study participants, on four different image types; T2-weighted (T2w), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and PSMA-PET scans separately. The simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm was used to generate combined GTVs. GTVs were subsequently compared to histopathology. We analysed how Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and lesion coverage are affected by using single versus multiple image types as well as by adding a clinical target volume (CTV) margin.

Results

Median DSC (STAPLE) for different GTVs varied between 0.33 and 0.52. GTVPSMA-PET/mpMRI generated the highest median lesion coverage at 0.66. Combining different image types achieved similar lesion coverage as adding a CTV margin to contours from a single image type, while reducing non-malignant tissue inclusion within the target volume.

Conclusion

The combined use of mpMRI or PSMA-PET/mpMRI shows promise, achieving higher DSC and lesion coverage while minimizing non-malignant tissue inclusion, in comparison to the use of a single image type with an added CTV margin.

背景和目的前列腺癌体外放射治疗中的剂量升级在生化无病生存方面显示出良好的效果。增殖体积划分指南很少,这可能会导致观察者之间的高变异性。这项研究的目的是根据多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)和前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描(PSMA-PET)与组织病理学验证的格里森4级和5级区域的关系来描述肿瘤总体积(GTV)的特征。四位放射肿瘤专家分别在四种不同的图像类型(T2-加权(T2w)、弥散加权成像(DWI)、动态对比增强(DCE)和 PSMA-PET 扫描)上为 15 名研究对象划定了 GTV。采用同步真相和性能水平估计(STAPLE)算法生成综合 GTV。随后将 GTV 与组织病理学进行比较。我们分析了使用单一图像类型与使用多种图像类型以及增加临床靶体积(CTV)边缘对戴斯相似系数(DSC)和病灶覆盖率的影响。结果不同 GTV 的中位 DSC (STAPLE) 在 0.33 和 0.52 之间变化。GTVPSMA-PET/mpMRI产生的中位病灶覆盖率最高,为0.66。结论mpMRI或PSMA-PET/mpMRI的联合使用显示了前景,与使用带有CTV边缘的单一图像类型相比,它能获得更高的DSC和病灶覆盖率,同时最大限度地减少非恶性组织包涵。
{"title":"Histopathology-validated gross tumor volume delineations of intraprostatic lesions using PSMA-positron emission tomography/multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging","authors":"Josefine Grefve ,&nbsp;Karin Söderkvist ,&nbsp;Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson ,&nbsp;Kristina Sandgren ,&nbsp;Joakim Jonsson ,&nbsp;Angsana Keeratijarut Lindberg ,&nbsp;Erik Nilsson ,&nbsp;Jan Axelsson ,&nbsp;Anders Bergh ,&nbsp;Björn Zackrisson ,&nbsp;Mathieu Moreau ,&nbsp;Camilla Thellenberg Karlsson ,&nbsp;Lars.E. Olsson ,&nbsp;Anders Widmark ,&nbsp;Katrine Riklund ,&nbsp;Lennart Blomqvist ,&nbsp;Vibeke Berg Loegager ,&nbsp;Sara N. Strandberg ,&nbsp;Tufve Nyholm","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100633","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100633","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Dose escalation in external radiotherapy of prostate cancer shows promising results in terms of biochemical disease-free survival. Boost volume delineation guidelines are sparse which may cause high interobserver variability. The aim of this research was to characterize gross tumor volume (GTV) delineations based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) in relation to histopathology-validated Gleason grade 4 and 5 regions.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>The study participants were examined with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]PSMA-PET/mpMRI prior to radical prostatectomy. Four radiation oncologists delineated GTVs in 15 study participants, on four different image types; T2-weighted (T2w), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and PSMA-PET scans separately. The simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm was used to generate combined GTVs. GTVs were subsequently compared to histopathology. We analysed how Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and lesion coverage are affected by using single versus multiple image types as well as by adding a clinical target volume (CTV) margin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median DSC (STAPLE) for different GTVs varied between 0.33 and 0.52. GTV<sub>PSMA-PET/mpMRI</sub> generated the highest median lesion coverage at 0.66. Combining different image types achieved similar lesion coverage as adding a CTV margin to contours from a single image type, while reducing non-malignant tissue inclusion within the target volume.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The combined use of mpMRI or PSMA-PET/mpMRI shows promise, achieving higher DSC and lesion coverage while minimizing non-malignant tissue inclusion, in comparison to the use of a single image type with an added CTV margin.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100633"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001039/pdfft?md5=b71b9bd1ff863c1b10a65329734f1ed1&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001039-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142099479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multi-modality imaging parameters that predict rapid tumor regression in head and neck radiotherapy 预测头颈部放疗中肿瘤快速消退的多模态成像参数
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100603
Eric Aliotta , Ramesh Paudyal , Bill Diplas , James Han , Yu-Chi Hu , Jung Hun Oh , Vaios Hatzoglou , Naomi Jensen , Peng Zhang , Michalis Aristophanous , Nadeem Riaz , Joseph O. Deasy , Nancy Y. Lee , Amita Shukla-Dave

Background and purpose

Volume regression during radiotherapy can indicate patient-specific treatment response. We aimed to identify pre-treatment multimodality imaging (MMI) metrics from positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) that predict rapid tumor regression during radiotherapy in human papilloma virus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Materials and methods

Pre-treatment FDG PET-CT, diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), and intra-treatment (at 1, 2, and 3 weeks) MRI were acquired in 72 patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy for HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma. Nodal gross tumor volumes were delineated on longitudinal images to measure intra-treatment volume changes. Pre-treatment PET standardized uptake value (SUV), CT Hounsfield Unit (HU), and non-gaussian intravoxel incoherent motion DW-MRI metrics were computed and correlated with volume changes. Intercorrelations between MMI metrics were also assessed using network analysis. Validation was carried out on a separate cohort (N = 64) for FDG PET-CT.

Results

Significant correlations with volume loss were observed for baseline FDG SUVmean (Spearman ρ = 0.46, p < 0.001), CT HUmean (ρ = 0.38, p = 0.001), and DW-MRI diffusion coefficient, Dmean (ρ = -0.39, p < 0.001). Network analysis revealed 41 intercorrelations between MMI and volume loss metrics, but SUVmean remained a statistically significant predictor of volume loss in multivariate linear regression (p = 0.01). Significant correlations were also observed for SUVmean in the validation cohort in both primary (ρ = 0.30, p = 0.02) and nodal (ρ = 0.31, p = 0.02) tumors.

Conclusions

Multiple pre-treatment imaging metrics were correlated with rapid nodal gross tumor volume loss during radiotherapy. FDG-PET SUV in particular exhibited significant correlations with volume regression across the two cohorts and in multivariate analysis.

背景和目的放疗期间的体积消退可表明患者的特异性治疗反应。我们旨在从正电子发射断层扫描(PET)、磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)中确定治疗前多模态成像(MMI)指标,以预测人乳头状瘤病毒(HPV)相关口咽癌放疗期间肿瘤的快速消退。材料与方法 对 72 名接受化疗的 HPV+ 口咽癌患者进行了治疗前 FDG PET-CT、弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)和治疗中(1、2 和 3 周)磁共振成像检查。在纵向图像上划定结节性大体肿瘤体积,以测量治疗期间的体积变化。计算治疗前 PET 标准化摄取值 (SUV)、CT 霍斯菲尔德单位 (HU) 和非高斯体外不相干运动 DW-MRI 指标,并将其与体积变化相关联。还利用网络分析法评估了 MMI 指标之间的相互关系。结果基线 FDG SUVmean(Spearman ρ = 0.46,p < 0.001)、CT HUmean(ρ = 0.38,p = 0.001)和 DW-MRI 弥散系数 Dmean(ρ = -0.39,p < 0.001)与体积丢失有显著相关性。网络分析显示,MMI 和容积损失指标之间存在 41 种相互关系,但在多元线性回归中,SUVmean 仍是容积损失的一个具有统计学意义的预测指标(p = 0.01)。在原发性肿瘤(ρ = 0.30,p = 0.02)和结节性肿瘤(ρ = 0.31,p = 0.02)的验证队列中也观察到 SUVmean 的显著相关性。FDG-PET的SUV值尤其与两个队列的肿瘤体积缩小有显著相关性,在多变量分析中也是如此。
{"title":"Multi-modality imaging parameters that predict rapid tumor regression in head and neck radiotherapy","authors":"Eric Aliotta ,&nbsp;Ramesh Paudyal ,&nbsp;Bill Diplas ,&nbsp;James Han ,&nbsp;Yu-Chi Hu ,&nbsp;Jung Hun Oh ,&nbsp;Vaios Hatzoglou ,&nbsp;Naomi Jensen ,&nbsp;Peng Zhang ,&nbsp;Michalis Aristophanous ,&nbsp;Nadeem Riaz ,&nbsp;Joseph O. Deasy ,&nbsp;Nancy Y. Lee ,&nbsp;Amita Shukla-Dave","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100603","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100603","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Volume regression during radiotherapy can indicate patient-specific treatment response. We aimed to identify pre-treatment multimodality imaging (MMI) metrics from positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) that predict rapid tumor regression during radiotherapy in human papilloma virus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal carcinoma.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Pre-treatment FDG PET-CT, diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), and intra-treatment (at 1, 2, and 3 weeks) MRI were acquired in 72 patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy for HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma. Nodal gross tumor volumes were delineated on longitudinal images to measure intra-treatment volume changes. Pre-treatment PET standardized uptake value (SUV), CT Hounsfield Unit (HU), and non-gaussian intravoxel incoherent motion DW-MRI metrics were computed and correlated with volume changes. Intercorrelations between MMI metrics were also assessed using network analysis. Validation was carried out on a separate cohort (N = 64) for FDG PET-CT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant correlations with volume loss were observed for baseline FDG SUV<sub>mean</sub> (Spearman ρ = 0.46, p &lt; 0.001), CT HU<sub>mean</sub> (ρ = 0.38, p = 0.001), and DW-MRI diffusion coefficient, D<sub>mean</sub> (ρ = -0.39, p &lt; 0.001). Network analysis revealed 41 intercorrelations between MMI and volume loss metrics, but SUV<sub>mean</sub> remained a statistically significant predictor of volume loss in multivariate linear regression (p = 0.01). Significant correlations were also observed for SUV<sub>mean</sub> in the validation cohort in both primary (ρ = 0.30, p = 0.02) and nodal (ρ = 0.31, p = 0.02) tumors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Multiple pre-treatment imaging metrics were correlated with rapid nodal gross tumor volume loss during radiotherapy. FDG-PET SUV in particular exhibited significant correlations with volume regression across the two cohorts and in multivariate analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000733/pdfft?md5=9045d5a812efecba363adf39f4aa588f&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000733-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141481359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility of simulation free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy using an expedited pre-plan workflow 使用快速预计划工作流程进行无模拟腹部立体定向自适应放射治疗的可行性
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100611
Alex T. Price , Joshua P. Schiff , Alice Silberstein , Robbie Beckert , Tianyu Zhao , Geoffrey D. Hugo , Pamela P. Samson , Eric Laugeman , Lauren E. Henke

Background and Purpose

Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an in silico study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).

Materials and Methods

Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient’s target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.

Results

The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm3 between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was −0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, −5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.

Conclusion

The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.

我们的目的是在一项无模拟腹部立体定向自适应放疗(ART)的模拟研究中,证明仅使用诊断(dx)计算机断层扫描(CT)定义的目标预规划的可行性。每位患者的靶点都在 dxCT 上进行了划定。目标预规划主要用于 ART 过程。在 ART 治疗过程中,所有结构都被划定。所有模拟病例都在规划目标优化结构 (PTV_OPT) 中进行了 50 Gy 分 5 次治疗,以便在规划目标体积内进行剂量升级。工作流程中各步骤的时间都被记录下来。将 ART 治疗计划与使用传统计划工作流程在 CT 模拟扫描上创建的计划进行计划质量比较。结果该工作流程在所有尝试中都是可行的,尽管缺乏初始 OAR 轮廓,但在所有分段中都符合风险器官 (OAR) 约束条件。PTV_Opt V95% 的适应计划与模拟 CT 计划之间的中位绝对差异为 2.0%。适应计划与模拟 CT 计划之间 D0.5 cm3 的中位绝对差异为:胃 -0.9 Gy,十二指肠 1.2 Gy,小肠 -5.3 Gy,大肠 0.3 Gy。中位端到端工作流程时间为 63 分钟。
{"title":"Feasibility of simulation free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy using an expedited pre-plan workflow","authors":"Alex T. Price ,&nbsp;Joshua P. Schiff ,&nbsp;Alice Silberstein ,&nbsp;Robbie Beckert ,&nbsp;Tianyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Geoffrey D. Hugo ,&nbsp;Pamela P. Samson ,&nbsp;Eric Laugeman ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Henke","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100611","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100611","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>Improved hounsfield-unit accuracy of on-board imaging may lead to direct-to-unit treatment approaches We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using only a diagnostic (dx) computed tomography (CT)-defined target pre-plan in an <em>in silico</em> study of simulation-free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (ART).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Eight patients with abdominal treatment sites (five pancreatic cancer, three oligometastases) were treated using an integrated adaptive O-Ring gantry system. Each patient’s target was delineated on a dxCT. The target only pre-plan served primarily to seed the ART process. During the ART session, all structures were delineated. All simulated cases were treated to 50 Gy in 5 fractions to a planning target optimization structure (PTV_OPT) to allow for dose escalation within the planning target volume. Timing of steps during this workflow was recorded. Plan quality was compared between ART treatment plans and a plan created on a CT simulation scan using the traditional planning workflow.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The workflow was feasible in all attempts, with organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints met in all fractions despite lack of initial OAR contours. Median absolute difference between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan for the PTV_Opt V95% was 2.0 %. Median absolute difference in the D0.5 cm<sup>3</sup> between the adapted plan and simulation CT plan was −0.9 Gy for stomach, 1.2 Gy for duodenum, −5.3 Gy for small bowel, and 0.3 Gy for large bowel. Median end-to-end workflow time was 63 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The workflow was feasible for a dxCT-defined target-only pre-plan approach to stereotactic abdominal ART.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000812/pdfft?md5=fb856b62ebccaf8ffa345fd98e38c826&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000812-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141705970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Target coverage and organs at risk dose in hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy 前列腺切除术后低分次挽救性放疗的靶点覆盖率和危险器官剂量
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100600
Floor H.E. Staal, Jorinde Janssen, Sajee Krishnapillai, Johannes A. Langendijk, Stefan Both, Charlotte L. Brouwer, Shafak Aluwini

Background and purpose

Introducing moderately hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy (SRT) following prostatectomy obligates investigation of its effects on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. This study assessed interfractional volume and dose changes in OARs and CTV in moderately hypofractionated SRT and evaluated the 8-mm planning target volume (PTV) margin.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients from the PERYTON-trial were included; 10 received conventional SRT (35 × 2 Gy) and 10 hypofractionated SRT (20 × 3 Gy). OARs were delineated on 539 pre-treatment Cone Beam CT (CBCT) scans to compare interfractional OAR volume changes. CTVs for the hypofractionated group were delineated on 199 CBCTs. Dose distributions with 4 and 6 mm PTV margins were generated using voxel-wise minimum robustness evaluation of the original 8-mm PTV plan, and dose changes were assessed.

Results

Median volume changes for bladder and rectum were −26 % and −10 %, respectively. OAR volume changes were not significantly different between the two treatment schedules. The 8-mm PTV margin ensured optimal coverage for prostate bed and vesicle bed CTV (V95 = 100 % in >97 % fractions). However, bladder V60 <25 % was not achieved in 5 % of fractions, and rectum V60 <5 % was unmet in 33 % of fractions. A 6-mm PTV margin resulted in CTV V95 = 100 % in 92 % of fractions for prostate bed, and in 86 % for vesicle bed CTV.

Conclusions

Moderately hypofractionated SRT yielded comparable OAR volume changes to conventionally fractionated SRT. Interfractional changes remained acceptable with a PTV margin of 6 mm for prostate bed and 8 mm for vesicle bed.

背景和目的在前列腺切除术后采用适度低分次挽救性放疗(SRT)必须研究其对临床靶体积(CTV)覆盖率和危险器官(OAR)剂量的影响。本研究评估了适度低分次 SRT 中 OAR 和 CTV 的分区间体积和剂量变化,并评估了 8 毫米计划靶体积(PTV)边缘。材料和方法纳入了 PERYTON 试验的 20 例患者;其中 10 例接受了传统 SRT(35 × 2 Gy),10 例接受了低分次 SRT(20 × 3 Gy)。在 539 次治疗前锥形束 CT(CBCT)扫描中划定了 OAR,以比较点阵间 OAR 体积的变化。在 199 张 CBCT 扫描图像上划定了低剂量组的 CTV。通过对原始 8 毫米 PTV 计划进行体素最小稳健性评估,生成了 4 毫米和 6 毫米 PTV 边缘的剂量分布,并对剂量变化进行了评估。两种治疗方案的OAR体积变化差异不大。8毫米的PTV边缘确保了前列腺床和膀胱床CTV的最佳覆盖率(V95=100%,97%分次)。然而,有 5% 的分次未达到膀胱 V60 <25%,33% 的分次未达到直肠 V60 <5%。6毫米的PTV边缘使92%的分次前列腺床CTV V95 = 100%,86%的分次膀胱床CTV V95 = 100%。前列腺床和膀胱床的 PTV 边界分别为 6 毫米和 8 毫米,分段间的变化仍然可以接受。
{"title":"Target coverage and organs at risk dose in hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy","authors":"Floor H.E. Staal,&nbsp;Jorinde Janssen,&nbsp;Sajee Krishnapillai,&nbsp;Johannes A. Langendijk,&nbsp;Stefan Both,&nbsp;Charlotte L. Brouwer,&nbsp;Shafak Aluwini","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100600","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Introducing moderately hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy (SRT) following prostatectomy obligates investigation of its effects on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. This study assessed interfractional volume and dose changes in OARs and CTV in moderately hypofractionated SRT and evaluated the 8-mm planning target volume (PTV) margin.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty patients from the PERYTON-trial were included; 10 received conventional SRT (35 × 2 Gy) and 10 hypofractionated SRT (20 × 3 Gy). OARs were delineated on 539 pre-treatment Cone Beam CT (CBCT) scans to compare interfractional OAR volume changes. CTVs for the hypofractionated group were delineated on 199 CBCTs. Dose distributions with 4 and 6 mm PTV margins were generated using voxel-wise minimum robustness evaluation of the original 8-mm PTV plan, and dose changes were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median volume changes for bladder and rectum were −26 % and −10 %, respectively. OAR volume changes were not significantly different between the two treatment schedules. The 8-mm PTV margin ensured optimal coverage for prostate bed and vesicle bed CTV (V95 = 100 % in &gt;97 % fractions). However, bladder V60 &lt;25 % was not achieved in 5 % of fractions, and rectum V60 &lt;5 % was unmet in 33 % of fractions. A 6-mm PTV margin resulted in CTV V95 = 100 % in 92 % of fractions for prostate bed, and in 86 % for vesicle bed CTV.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Moderately hypofractionated SRT yielded comparable OAR volume changes to conventionally fractionated SRT. Interfractional changes remained acceptable with a PTV margin of 6 mm for prostate bed and 8 mm for vesicle bed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100600"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000708/pdfft?md5=132a0a691b8570ae9bf8ccaf6ecd72ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000708-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141479446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Data-driven gated positron emission tomography/computed tomography for radiotherapy 用于放射治疗的数据驱动门控正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描技术
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100601
Tinsu Pan , Dershan Luo

Purpose

Software-based data-driven gated (DDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has replaced hardware-based 4D PET/CT. The purpose of this article was to review DDG PET/CT, which could improve the accuracy of treatment response assessment, tumor motion evaluation, and target tumor contouring with whole-body (WB) PET/CT for radiotherapy (RT).

Material and methods

This review covered the topics of 4D PET/CT with hardware gating, advancements in PET instrumentation, DDG PET, DDG CT, and DDG PET/CT based on a systematic literature review. It included a discussion of the large axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET detector and a review of the clinical results of DDG PET and DDG PET/CT.

Results

DDG PET matched or outperformed 4D PET with hardware gating. DDG CT was more compatible with DDG PET than 4D CT, which required hardware gating. DDG CT could replace 4D CT for RT. DDG PET and DDG CT for DDG PET/CT can be incorporated in a WB PET/CT of less than 15 min scan time on a PET/CT scanner of at least 25 cm AFOV PET detector.

Conclusions

DDG PET/CT could correct the misregistration and tumor motion artifacts in a WB PET/CT and provide the quantitative PET and tumor motion information of a registered PET/CT for RT.

目的基于软件的数据驱动门控(DDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)已经取代了基于硬件的4D PET/CT。本文的目的是对 DDG PET/CT 进行综述,该技术可提高放疗(RT)中全身(WB)PET/CT 治疗反应评估、肿瘤运动评估和靶肿瘤轮廓绘制的准确性。材料和方法本综述基于系统性文献综述,涵盖了硬件选通的 4D PET/CT、PET 仪器的进步、DDG PET、DDG CT 和 DDG PET/CT 等主题。其中包括对大轴向视场(AFOV)PET 探测器的讨论,以及对 DDG PET 和 DDG PET/CT 临床结果的回顾。DDG CT 与需要硬件选通的 4D CT 相比,与 DDG PET 更为兼容。DDG CT可取代4D CT进行RT检查。结论DDG PET/CT可以纠正WB PET/CT中的错误配准和肿瘤运动伪影,并为RT提供配准PET/CT的定量PET和肿瘤运动信息。
{"title":"Data-driven gated positron emission tomography/computed tomography for radiotherapy","authors":"Tinsu Pan ,&nbsp;Dershan Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100601","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Software-based data-driven gated (DDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has replaced hardware-based 4D PET/CT. The purpose of this article was to review DDG PET/CT, which could improve the accuracy of treatment response assessment, tumor motion evaluation, and target tumor contouring with whole-body (WB) PET/CT for radiotherapy (RT).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This review covered the topics of 4D PET/CT with hardware gating, advancements in PET instrumentation, DDG PET, DDG CT, and DDG PET/CT based on a systematic literature review. It included a discussion of the large axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET detector and a review of the clinical results of DDG PET and DDG PET/CT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DDG PET matched or outperformed 4D PET with hardware gating. DDG CT was more compatible with DDG PET than 4D CT, which required hardware gating. DDG CT could replace 4D CT for RT. DDG PET and DDG CT for DDG PET/CT can be incorporated in a WB PET/CT of less than 15 min scan time on a PET/CT scanner of at least 25 cm AFOV PET detector.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>DDG PET/CT could correct the misregistration and tumor motion artifacts in a WB PET/CT and provide the quantitative PET and tumor motion information of a registered PET/CT for RT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162400071X/pdfft?md5=6ec4d7c81437ba1f40c849fbbb9ed997&pid=1-s2.0-S240563162400071X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141481356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A planning study of proton therapy dose escalation for non-small cell lung cancer 非小细胞肺癌质子疗法剂量升级规划研究
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100616
Arno C. Hessels, Sabine Visser, Stefan Both, Erik W. Korevaar, Johannes A. Langendijk, Robin Wijsman

In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), improving local control through radiotherapy dose escalation might improve survival. However, a photon-based RCT showed increased organ at risk dose exposure and worse overall survival in the dose escalation arm. In this study, intensity-modulated proton therapy plans with dose escalation to the primary tumour were created for 20 NSCLC patients. The mediastinal envelope was delineated to spare structures around the heart. It was possible to increase primary tumour dose up to 74.0 Gy without a significant increase in organ at risk doses and predicted toxicity.

对于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),通过提高放疗剂量来改善局部控制可能会提高生存率。然而,一项基于光子的 RCT 显示,剂量升级组的危险器官剂量暴露增加,总生存率降低。本研究为20名NSCLC患者制定了针对原发肿瘤的剂量递增的强度调控质子治疗计划。对纵隔包膜进行了划定,以保留心脏周围的结构。原发肿瘤剂量可以增加到 74.0 Gy,而风险器官剂量和预计毒性不会显著增加。
{"title":"A planning study of proton therapy dose escalation for non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"Arno C. Hessels,&nbsp;Sabine Visser,&nbsp;Stefan Both,&nbsp;Erik W. Korevaar,&nbsp;Johannes A. Langendijk,&nbsp;Robin Wijsman","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100616","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100616","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), improving local control through radiotherapy dose escalation might improve survival. However, a photon-based RCT showed increased organ at risk dose exposure and worse overall survival in the dose escalation arm. In this study, intensity-modulated proton therapy plans with dose escalation to the primary tumour were created for 20 NSCLC patients. The mediastinal envelope was delineated to spare structures around the heart. It was possible to increase primary tumour dose up to 74.0 Gy without a significant increase in organ at risk doses and predicted toxicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000861/pdfft?md5=764652d67f19ea096c13b4f9e1994df2&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000861-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141840896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparative analysis of preclinical computed tomography radiomics using cone-beam and micro-computed tomography scanners 使用锥形束和微型计算机断层扫描仪对临床前计算机断层扫描放射组学进行比较分析
IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100615
Kathryn H. Brown , Brianna N. Kerr , Mihaela Pettigrew , Kate Connor , Ian S. Miller , Liam Shiels , Colum Connolly , Conor K. McGarry , Annette T. Byrne , Karl T. Butterworth

Background and purpose

Radiomics analysis extracts quantitative data (features) from medical images. These features could potentially reflect biological characteristics and act as imaging biomarkers within precision medicine. However, there is a lack of cross-comparison and validation of radiomics outputs which is paramount for clinical implementation. In this study, we compared radiomics outputs across two computed tomography (CT)-based preclinical scanners.

Materials and methods

Cone beam CT (CBCT) and µCT scans were acquired using different preclinical CT imaging platforms. The reproducibility of radiomics features on each scanner was assessed using a phantom across imaging energies (40 & 60 kVp) and segmentation volumes (44–238 mm3). Retrospective mouse scans were used to compare feature reliability across varying tissue densities (lung, heart, bone), scanners and after voxel size harmonisation. Reliable features had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.8.

Results

First order and GLCM features were the most reliable on both scanners across different volumes. There was an inverse relationship between tissue density and feature reliability, with the highest number of features in lung (CBCT=580, µCT=734) and lowest in bone (CBCT=110, µCT=560). Comparable features for lung and heart tissues increased when voxel sizes were harmonised. We have identified tissue-specific preclinical radiomics signatures in mice for the lung (133), heart (35), and bone (15).

Conclusions

Preclinical CBCT and µCT scans can be used for radiomics analysis to support the development of meaningful radiomics signatures. This study demonstrates the importance of standardisation and emphasises the need for multi-centre studies.

背景和目的放射组学分析从医学图像中提取定量数据(特征)。这些特征有可能反映生物特征,并作为精准医学中的成像生物标记物。然而,目前缺乏对放射组学输出结果的交叉比较和验证,而这对临床实施至关重要。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的临床前扫描仪的放射组学输出结果。使用一个不同成像能量(40 & 60 kVp)和分割体积(44-238 mm3)的模型对每台扫描仪上放射组学特征的可重复性进行了评估。小鼠回顾性扫描用于比较不同组织密度(肺、心脏、骨骼)、扫描仪和体素大小协调后的特征可靠性。可靠特征的类内相关系数(ICC)为 0.8。结果在不同体积的两种扫描仪上,一阶特征和 GLCM 特征最为可靠。组织密度与特征可靠性之间存在反比关系,肺部的特征数量最多(CBCT=580,µCT=734),而骨骼的特征数量最少(CBCT=110,µCT=560)。统一体素尺寸后,肺部和心脏组织的可比特征增加了。我们确定了小鼠肺(133)、心脏(35)和骨骼(15)的组织特异性临床前放射组学特征。这项研究表明了标准化的重要性,并强调了多中心研究的必要性。
{"title":"A comparative analysis of preclinical computed tomography radiomics using cone-beam and micro-computed tomography scanners","authors":"Kathryn H. Brown ,&nbsp;Brianna N. Kerr ,&nbsp;Mihaela Pettigrew ,&nbsp;Kate Connor ,&nbsp;Ian S. Miller ,&nbsp;Liam Shiels ,&nbsp;Colum Connolly ,&nbsp;Conor K. McGarry ,&nbsp;Annette T. Byrne ,&nbsp;Karl T. Butterworth","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100615","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100615","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Radiomics analysis extracts quantitative data (features) from medical images. These features could potentially reflect biological characteristics and act as imaging biomarkers within precision medicine. However, there is a lack of cross-comparison and validation of radiomics outputs which is paramount for clinical implementation. In this study, we compared radiomics outputs across two computed tomography (CT)-based preclinical scanners.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Cone beam CT (CBCT) and µCT scans were acquired using different preclinical CT imaging platforms. The reproducibility of radiomics features on each scanner was assessed using a phantom across imaging energies (40 &amp; 60 kVp) and segmentation volumes (44–238 mm<sup>3</sup>). Retrospective mouse scans were used to compare feature reliability across varying tissue densities (lung, heart, bone), scanners and after voxel size harmonisation. Reliable features had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) &gt; 0.8.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>First order and GLCM features were the most reliable on both scanners across different volumes. There was an inverse relationship between tissue density and feature reliability, with the highest number of features in lung (CBCT=580, µCT=734) and lowest in bone (CBCT=110, µCT=560). Comparable features for lung and heart tissues increased when voxel sizes were harmonised. We have identified tissue-specific preclinical radiomics signatures in mice for the lung (133), heart (35), and bone (15).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Preclinical CBCT and µCT scans can be used for radiomics analysis to support the development of meaningful radiomics signatures. This study demonstrates the importance of standardisation and emphasises the need for multi-centre studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100615"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162400085X/pdfft?md5=b221bc4589295353c2252f604eaea120&pid=1-s2.0-S240563162400085X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141853630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1