Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2023.2257491
Klaus R. Kunzmann
"Caring for Place." disP - The Planning Review, 59(2), pp. 103–104 Notes1 Neben unzähligen Beiträgen in wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften hat Patsy Healey viel beachtete Bücher zu einer breiten Palette von Themen der Raumplanung verfasst, darunter: Healey, P. (2010): Making Better Places. The Planning Project in the Twenty First Century. London: Red Globe Press/Bloomsbury.Healey, P. (1997/2010): Collaborative Planning Shaping Policy in Fragmented Societies. London: Palgrave McMillan.Healey, P. (2013): Local Planning in British Land Use Planning. London: Pergamon Press.Healey, P.; Upton, R. (Hrsg.) (2010): Crossing Borders. International Exchange. London: Routledge.2 Die Bedeutung der Zivilgesellschaft wird in der wissenschaftlichen Literatur immer wieder betont, beispielsweise in:Friedmann, J. (1992): Empowerment. The Politics of Alternative Development. Oxford: Blackwell.Forrester, J. (1989): Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.Urry, J. (1981): The Anatomy of the Civil Society. The Economy, Civil Society and the State. London: Macmillan.Freise, M.; Zimmer, A. (Hrsg.) (2019): Zivilgesellschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat im Wandel. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Hummel, S.; Pfister, L.; Roth, J.; Strachwitz Graf, R. (2020): Zivilgesellschaftsverständnisse in Europa. Stuttgart.Strachwitz Graf, R. (2014): Achtung vor dem Bürger – Ein Plädoyer für die Stärkung der Zivilgesellschaft. Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder.Zimmer, A.; Priller, E. (Hrsg.) (2004): Future of Civil Society. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft.3 Seit 2011 fördert das Bundesministerium für Wohnen, Stadtentwicklung und Bauwesen in Deutschland im Rahmen der nationalen Stadtentwicklungspolitik das Programm «Menschen und Erfolge». Es sammelt und prämiert Erfolgsgeschichten lokaler Initiativen.
{"title":"Caring for Place","authors":"Klaus R. Kunzmann","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2257491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257491","url":null,"abstract":"\"Caring for Place.\" disP - The Planning Review, 59(2), pp. 103–104 Notes1 Neben unzähligen Beiträgen in wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften hat Patsy Healey viel beachtete Bücher zu einer breiten Palette von Themen der Raumplanung verfasst, darunter: Healey, P. (2010): Making Better Places. The Planning Project in the Twenty First Century. London: Red Globe Press/Bloomsbury.Healey, P. (1997/2010): Collaborative Planning Shaping Policy in Fragmented Societies. London: Palgrave McMillan.Healey, P. (2013): Local Planning in British Land Use Planning. London: Pergamon Press.Healey, P.; Upton, R. (Hrsg.) (2010): Crossing Borders. International Exchange. London: Routledge.2 Die Bedeutung der Zivilgesellschaft wird in der wissenschaftlichen Literatur immer wieder betont, beispielsweise in:Friedmann, J. (1992): Empowerment. The Politics of Alternative Development. Oxford: Blackwell.Forrester, J. (1989): Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.Urry, J. (1981): The Anatomy of the Civil Society. The Economy, Civil Society and the State. London: Macmillan.Freise, M.; Zimmer, A. (Hrsg.) (2019): Zivilgesellschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat im Wandel. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Hummel, S.; Pfister, L.; Roth, J.; Strachwitz Graf, R. (2020): Zivilgesellschaftsverständnisse in Europa. Stuttgart.Strachwitz Graf, R. (2014): Achtung vor dem Bürger – Ein Plädoyer für die Stärkung der Zivilgesellschaft. Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder.Zimmer, A.; Priller, E. (Hrsg.) (2004): Future of Civil Society. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft.3 Seit 2011 fördert das Bundesministerium für Wohnen, Stadtentwicklung und Bauwesen in Deutschland im Rahmen der nationalen Stadtentwicklungspolitik das Programm «Menschen und Erfolge». Es sammelt und prämiert Erfolgsgeschichten lokaler Initiativen.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135717583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2023.2257482
Ariane Widmer
AbstractThe Greater Geneva partners have launched a large-scale exploratory project, the Vision territoriale transfrontalière 2050 (Cross-border Territorial Vision 2050). With this approach, they want to find out under which conditions the Greater Geneva area, a living space of one million inhabitants with ongoing demographic growth, can redirect its spatial planning in order to contribute to achieving the objectives of the ecological transition in the broadest sense, while respecting planetary boundaries and social cohesion.At the time of writing, the process is at the halfway point. The article describes the status of the work, the reasons for and origins of the project, its ambitions, working method and first results. Based on this overview, an encouraging interim assessment can be made. Four major converging themes have emerged and the contours of the spatial concept are taking shape. However, this assessment also reveals the complexity of the issue and the obstacles and contradictions to be overcome. Whatever the outcome, one thing is clear: the energy and commitment of all the parties involved are impressive and encourage us to continue along the path we have embarked upon.Carbon-neutral Greater Geneva - a cross-border territorial vision for 2050 Notes1 Raworth, K. (2017) : Doughnut economics : seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.2 Grand Genève (ge.ch) – Le Grand Genève s’ins- crit dans 2 pays, la Suisse et la France, sur plus de 2000 km2. Il regroupe 209 communes comprises dans 2 cantons, celui de Genève et celui de Vaud ; 2 départements, celui de l’Ain et celui de la Haute-Savoie, ainsi qu’une région, celle Auvergne Rhône Alpes. Le Grand Genève comprend 1 027 000 habitants pour 500 000 emplois (Accueil – Grand Genève, grand-geneve.org).3 Plan climat cantonal 2030 (PCC), ge.ch.4 En transition – Grand Genève en Transition (grand-geneve-en-transition.org) et Charte_ Grand_Geneve_en_Transition_2023.pdf (grandgeneve. org).5 Politique des agglomérations 2016+ de la Confédération (admin.ch). Projets d’agglomération – Grand Genève (grand-geneve.org).6 Observatoire statistique transfrontalier, synthèse 2021 (ge.ch).7 Département du territoire (2022): Territoire des courtes distances: diagnostic et enjeux pour le Canton de Genève et le Grand Genève. Rapport final.8 Confédération, Conseil de l’organisation du territoire (2019): Mégatrends et développement territorial en Suisse.9 Praille Acacias Vernets (PAV) (ge.ch).10 Le Plan climat cantonal 2030 de 2e génération a été adopté en juin 2021 afin de renforcer les objectifs de diminution des émissions de gaz à effet de serre et de neutralité carbone (Plan climat cantonal 2030 – 2e génération, ge.ch).11 Vision territoriale transfrontalière 2050, Feuille de route pour le nouveau plan directeur cantonal, adoption par le Conseil d’Etat genevois le 8 décembre 2021.12 Philippe Biéler, Claudia Binder, Sandro Cattacin, Kees Christiaanse, Je
大日内瓦合作伙伴启动了一项大规模的探索性项目，即2050年跨境领土愿景(Vision territoriale transfrontalitre 2050)。通过这种方法，他们希望找出在何种条件下，大日内瓦地区，一个拥有100万居民的生活空间，人口不断增长，可以重新调整其空间规划，以便在尊重地球边界和社会凝聚力的同时，为实现最广泛意义上的生态转型目标做出贡献。在撰写本文时，该过程正处于中途点。文章描述了工作的现状，项目的原因和起源，它的目标，工作方法和初步成果。基于这一概述，可以作出令人鼓舞的中期评估。四个主要的主题已经出现，空间概念的轮廓正在形成。然而，这种评估也揭示了问题的复杂性以及需要克服的障碍和矛盾。无论结果如何，有一点是明确的:所有有关各方的精力和承诺令人印象深刻，并鼓励我们继续沿着我们已经走上的道路前进。碳中和的大日内瓦——2050年的跨境领土愿景[注1]Raworth, K.(2017):甜甜圈经济学:像21世纪经济学家一样思考的七种方式。佛蒙特州白河枢纽:切尔西格林出版公司。2大绅士区(ge.ch) - Le Grand gen<e:1>区s 'ins - crit dans 2 pays, la Suisse和la France, sur + de 2000平方公里。将重组209个市镇，包括2个州，吉纳特省和沃州省;2个dsamicement, celui de l 'Ain和celui de la上萨瓦，ainsi qu 'une samicement, celle Auvergne Rhône阿尔卑斯。大gen<e:1>区拥有102.7万居民和50万雇员(Accueil - Grand gen<e:1>区，grandgeneve.org)。3规划气候州2030 (PCC)， ge.ch.4grandgeneve_en_transition_2023 .pdf (grandgeneve. exe)org) 5《2016年结缔组织政策》+《结缔组织政策》(administrative .ch)。6跨界统计观察站，synth<e:1>， 2021 (ge.ch)领土管理部门(2022):领土管理部门:诊断和享受le Canton de gen<e:1>和le Grand gen<e:1>。融洽final.89 .确认的<s:2> <s:2> <s:2> <s:2> <s:2> <s:2> <s:2>的<s:2> <s:2> <s:2>的<s:2> <s:2>的<s:2>的或与之相关的<s:2> /或与之相关的<s:2> /或与之相关的<s:2> /或与之相关的<s:2> /或与之相关的组织(2019)11 .《气候州计划2030 - 2e - gcv / ccv》于2021年6月发布，旨在实现减少gcv / ccv / ccv / ccv影响和中性碳排放的目标(《气候州计划2030 - 2e - gcv / ccv》)2050年跨地区远景规划，新规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划规划Sonia Seneviratne、Sophie Swaton、Martin Tschirren、g<s:1> nther Vogt.13、专家学院成员:Bruno Marchand (prachim)、Pierre Feddersen、Sonia Lavadinho、Marlyne Sahakian、Julia Steinberger、herv<s:1> Froidevaux.14、Selon le r<e:1>管理学院(SIA 143)、Les planusiantest、des procesimuimpliant un dialogue。15 .为综合项目设计解决方案，为综合项目设计解决方案，为综合项目设计解决方案，为综合项目设计解决方案，为综合项目设计解决方案Pour le Jura，城市规划，洛桑。Pour le Rhône, g<s:2> ller et g<s:2> ller <e:1> Zurich。Pour l 'Arve, AREP, Paris。17 . Pour le Chablais，维加诺工作室，米兰里昂(02)。2022 - 06。[2023]及《城市规划》(doc . 01)。10. 2023)。18 https://www.grand-geneve-en-transition.org/participation-citoyenne.19 Transitec, gen<e:1>Urbaplan, Geneve.21Les dix objects de la Charte Grand gen<e:1> en transition sont:Atteindre la neutralit<s:1> carbonone sur le territoire du Grand genve 2。社会的影响，社会的影响，社会的影响，社会的影响，社会的影响，社会的影响在生物多样性领域，pracerver和pracerm都有各自的目标。pracerver l ' intacergrit<e:1> du racerseau hydrograpque et des resources en . 5。prasserver et amassliover la qualit<s:1> des sols et des ressources du sous- sols 6。7.我的前程远大于我的前程远大于我的前程。更喜欢的人是那些居住在土地上的人。企业家没有条件对人口进行管理。更确切地说，这些条件将使我们的生活更加愉快，并使我们的生活更加愉快。 为改善世界人口的福祉作出贡献22可评估的标准是:实现碳中和(目标1)，保护和再生当地生物多样性(目标3)，保护和改善土壤和底土资源的质量(目标5)。目前的规划清楚地表明，到2050年，集聚规模没有达到零人工/净消费的目标(2040年每年消耗150公顷，而目前为106公顷)。23 6t, geneve 24 Grand geneve(2021):第四代聚集项目- Grand geneve。主要报告，第79页;州统计局-新闻(ge.ch)(21。03. 2023);跨界统计观测站，2021年综合(ge.ch)25个公共任务，巴黎26大日内瓦过渡-生态过渡行动
{"title":"Le Grand Genève neutre en carbone – une vision territoriale transfrontalière pour l’horizon 2050","authors":"Ariane Widmer","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2257482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257482","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe Greater Geneva partners have launched a large-scale exploratory project, the Vision territoriale transfrontalière 2050 (Cross-border Territorial Vision 2050). With this approach, they want to find out under which conditions the Greater Geneva area, a living space of one million inhabitants with ongoing demographic growth, can redirect its spatial planning in order to contribute to achieving the objectives of the ecological transition in the broadest sense, while respecting planetary boundaries and social cohesion.At the time of writing, the process is at the halfway point. The article describes the status of the work, the reasons for and origins of the project, its ambitions, working method and first results. Based on this overview, an encouraging interim assessment can be made. Four major converging themes have emerged and the contours of the spatial concept are taking shape. However, this assessment also reveals the complexity of the issue and the obstacles and contradictions to be overcome. Whatever the outcome, one thing is clear: the energy and commitment of all the parties involved are impressive and encourage us to continue along the path we have embarked upon.Carbon-neutral Greater Geneva - a cross-border territorial vision for 2050 Notes1 Raworth, K. (2017) : Doughnut economics : seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.2 Grand Genève (ge.ch) – Le Grand Genève s’ins- crit dans 2 pays, la Suisse et la France, sur plus de 2000 km2. Il regroupe 209 communes comprises dans 2 cantons, celui de Genève et celui de Vaud ; 2 départements, celui de l’Ain et celui de la Haute-Savoie, ainsi qu’une région, celle Auvergne Rhône Alpes. Le Grand Genève comprend 1 027 000 habitants pour 500 000 emplois (Accueil – Grand Genève, grand-geneve.org).3 Plan climat cantonal 2030 (PCC), ge.ch.4 En transition – Grand Genève en Transition (grand-geneve-en-transition.org) et Charte_ Grand_Geneve_en_Transition_2023.pdf (grandgeneve. org).5 Politique des agglomérations 2016+ de la Confédération (admin.ch). Projets d’agglomération – Grand Genève (grand-geneve.org).6 Observatoire statistique transfrontalier, synthèse 2021 (ge.ch).7 Département du territoire (2022): Territoire des courtes distances: diagnostic et enjeux pour le Canton de Genève et le Grand Genève. Rapport final.8 Confédération, Conseil de l’organisation du territoire (2019): Mégatrends et développement territorial en Suisse.9 Praille Acacias Vernets (PAV) (ge.ch).10 Le Plan climat cantonal 2030 de 2e génération a été adopté en juin 2021 afin de renforcer les objectifs de diminution des émissions de gaz à effet de serre et de neutralité carbone (Plan climat cantonal 2030 – 2e génération, ge.ch).11 Vision territoriale transfrontalière 2050, Feuille de route pour le nouveau plan directeur cantonal, adoption par le Conseil d’Etat genevois le 8 décembre 2021.12 Philippe Biéler, Claudia Binder, Sandro Cattacin, Kees Christiaanse, Je","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135717581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2023.2257490
Radu-Matei Cocheci, Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor
AbstractIn post-socialist countries, suburbanisation of metropolitan areas has been the main pattern of urbanisation since 1990, especially under the form of urban sprawl by residential development. Privatisation processes, deregulation of the real estate market and greater sovereignty of local administrative units have led to specific challenges for post-socialist countries when managing suburbanisation. While specific case studies have been used to highlight the dynamics of urban areas in these countries after 1990, there has been little research done at a national level focusing on urbanisation patterns in post-socialist metropolitan areas. Using Romanian metropolitan areas as a case study, this paper proposes a ranking of metropolitan areas based on the dynamics of artificial surfaces and housing units. An analysis of 1990– 2018 CORINE Land Cover and Use Change data was carried out nationwide using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst tools, along with an analysis of ancillary data from the National Institute of Statistics regarding housing. The results illustrated that suburban development is concentrated around the largest Romanian cities, declared National Growth Poles during the programming period 2007–2013, also highlighting some limits in using CORINE data for 1990 and 2000. The proposed ranking of metropolitan areas could aid the design of tailored development policies and planning instruments for the most dynamic urban areas. Such analyses have the potential to be replicated in other post-socialist countries, as well as in countries experiencing metropolitan suburbanisation irrespective of their recent political history. AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitisation, CNCS − UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P1- 1.1-PD-2021-0030, within PNCDI III. We thank the reviewers for their valuable feedback that aided us in improving our research.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRadu-Matei CocheciRadu-Matei Cocheci is an urban planner, holding a PhD in Geography (University of Bucharest, 2016), specialised in both spatial planning and regional development (Master’s course, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, 2013), as well as in environmental sciences (University of Bucharest, 2013). He is a lecturer in the Urban Planning and Territorial Development Department at Ion Mincu University for courses in Urban Geography and Ecology, Geographical Informational Systems and Strategic Territorial Planning. His research focus is related to environmental issues and constraints at a local or regional level, with over 25 publications and over 20 presentations at international conferences. Since 2011, he has been working as an urban planner and consultant in various urban planning and design projects in Romania, including development strategies at county, metropolitan and local levels.Alexandru-Ionuţ PetrişorAlexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor earned his BS in ecology (1997) and PhD in ge
{"title":"Extended suburbanisation and land cover dynamics in post-socialist metropolitan areas","authors":"Radu-Matei Cocheci, Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2257490","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257490","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn post-socialist countries, suburbanisation of metropolitan areas has been the main pattern of urbanisation since 1990, especially under the form of urban sprawl by residential development. Privatisation processes, deregulation of the real estate market and greater sovereignty of local administrative units have led to specific challenges for post-socialist countries when managing suburbanisation. While specific case studies have been used to highlight the dynamics of urban areas in these countries after 1990, there has been little research done at a national level focusing on urbanisation patterns in post-socialist metropolitan areas. Using Romanian metropolitan areas as a case study, this paper proposes a ranking of metropolitan areas based on the dynamics of artificial surfaces and housing units. An analysis of 1990– 2018 CORINE Land Cover and Use Change data was carried out nationwide using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst tools, along with an analysis of ancillary data from the National Institute of Statistics regarding housing. The results illustrated that suburban development is concentrated around the largest Romanian cities, declared National Growth Poles during the programming period 2007–2013, also highlighting some limits in using CORINE data for 1990 and 2000. The proposed ranking of metropolitan areas could aid the design of tailored development policies and planning instruments for the most dynamic urban areas. Such analyses have the potential to be replicated in other post-socialist countries, as well as in countries experiencing metropolitan suburbanisation irrespective of their recent political history. AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitisation, CNCS − UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P1- 1.1-PD-2021-0030, within PNCDI III. We thank the reviewers for their valuable feedback that aided us in improving our research.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRadu-Matei CocheciRadu-Matei Cocheci is an urban planner, holding a PhD in Geography (University of Bucharest, 2016), specialised in both spatial planning and regional development (Master’s course, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, 2013), as well as in environmental sciences (University of Bucharest, 2013). He is a lecturer in the Urban Planning and Territorial Development Department at Ion Mincu University for courses in Urban Geography and Ecology, Geographical Informational Systems and Strategic Territorial Planning. His research focus is related to environmental issues and constraints at a local or regional level, with over 25 publications and over 20 presentations at international conferences. Since 2011, he has been working as an urban planner and consultant in various urban planning and design projects in Romania, including development strategies at county, metropolitan and local levels.Alexandru-Ionuţ PetrişorAlexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor earned his BS in ecology (1997) and PhD in ge","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135717388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2023.2257493
Klaus R. Kunzmann
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 E.g.: Broudehoux, A. M. (2004): The Making and Selling of Post-Mao Beijing. New York: Routledge.Campanella, T. J. (2008): The Concrete Dragon, China’s Urban Revolution and what it means for the World. Princeton Architectural Press.Esherick, J. W. (ed.) (1999): Remaking the Chinese City. Modernity and National Identity 1900–1950. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Fingerhuth, C.; Joos, E. (eds.) (2002): The Kunming Project: Urban Development in China: A Dialogue. Basel: Birkhäuser.Friedmann, J. (2005): China’s Urban Transition. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Wu, F. (2022): Creating Chinese Urbanism. Urban Revolution and Government Changes. London: UCL Press.Wu, F. (2015): Planning for Growth. Urban and Regional Planning in China. London: Routledge.2 See also the recently published book on the urban history of China:Lincoln, T. (2021): An Urban History of China. Cambridge: University Press.3 Saarinen, E. (1943): The City: Its Growth, Its Decay, Its Future. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.4 Soviet city planning concepts were partly rooted in the planning activities of German planners in the Soviet Union in the 1930s (such as Ernst May, Walter Gropius, Fred Forbát and Rudolf Wolters).5 Another comprehensive bibliography compiled by Yeh, A. G. O. (1999): Bibliography on Socioeconomic Development and Urban Development In China. Hong Kong: Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, University of Hong Kong.6 No list is final: Books translated into Chinese and missing from the list include, for example: Frick, D. (2006/2015): Theorie des Städtebaus. (Translated by Yi Xin).Hassenpflug, D. (2010): The Urban Code of China. Basel: Birkhäuser.Reicher, C.; Kunzmann, K. R.; Polívka, J.; Roost, F.; Wegener, M. (2011): Schichten einer Region: Kartenstücke zur räumlichen Struktur des Ruhrgebiets. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.Trieb, M. (1974/2021): Stadtgestaltung: Theorie und Praxis. In Chinese, Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (Translation: Yajin Zhang).However, books written by Manuel Castells, John Friedmann, Willem Salet, Louis Albrechts, Gerd Albers, François Ascher, Françoise Choay, Michael Batty, Rem Koolhaas, Tridib Banerjee, or Patsy Healey seem to still be on the waiting list for translations.
注1例如:brodehoux, A. M.(2004):《后毛时代北京的制作与销售》。纽约:劳特利奇出版社。坎帕内拉，T. J.(2008):混凝土龙:中国的城市革命及其对世界的意义。普林斯顿建筑出版社。谢立克(主编)(1999):《重塑中国城市》。现代性与国家认同1900-1950。檀香山:夏威夷大学出版社。Fingerhuth c;(主编)(2002):昆明项目:中国城市发展:对话。巴塞尔:Birkhauser。弗里德曼，J.(2005):中国的城市转型。明尼苏达:明尼苏达大学出版社。吴峰(2022):创造中国城市主义。城市革命与政府变革。伦敦:伦敦学院出版社。吴峰(2015):增长规划。中国城市与区域规划。参见最近出版的关于中国城市史的书:Lincoln, T. (2021): a urban history of China。3沙里宁，E.(1943):《城市:它的成长，它的衰败，它的未来》。纽约:Reinhold出版公司。4苏联的城市规划概念部分植根于20世纪30年代德国规划师在苏联的规划活动(如恩斯特·梅，沃尔特·格罗皮乌斯，弗雷德Forbát和鲁道夫·沃尔特斯)叶A. G.(1999)编写的另一个综合参考书目:《中国社会经济发展与城市发展参考书目》。香港:香港大学城市规划与环境管理中心。6未确定的中文翻译书籍包括:Frick, D. (2006/2015): Theorie des Städtebaus。(译:易欣)[韩春华，李建平(2010):中国城市法典。]巴塞尔:Birkhauser。理查,c;昆兹曼，k.r.;Polivka, j .;栖息,f;魏格纳，M. (2011): Schichten einer区域:kartenst cke zur räumlichen Ruhrgebiets。北京:中国建筑工业出版社。崔志明(1974/2021):《城市规划:理论与实践》。[m] .北京:中国建筑工业出版社。(翻译:张亚金)。然而，Manuel Castells、John Friedmann、Willem Salet、Louis Albrechts、Gerd Albers、franois Ascher、franois Choay、Michael Batty、Rem Koolhaas、Tridib Banerjee或Patsy Healey写的书似乎仍在等待翻译的名单上。
{"title":"Contemporary Urban Design Thoughts in China","authors":"Klaus R. Kunzmann","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2257493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257493","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 E.g.: Broudehoux, A. M. (2004): The Making and Selling of Post-Mao Beijing. New York: Routledge.Campanella, T. J. (2008): The Concrete Dragon, China’s Urban Revolution and what it means for the World. Princeton Architectural Press.Esherick, J. W. (ed.) (1999): Remaking the Chinese City. Modernity and National Identity 1900–1950. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Fingerhuth, C.; Joos, E. (eds.) (2002): The Kunming Project: Urban Development in China: A Dialogue. Basel: Birkhäuser.Friedmann, J. (2005): China’s Urban Transition. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Wu, F. (2022): Creating Chinese Urbanism. Urban Revolution and Government Changes. London: UCL Press.Wu, F. (2015): Planning for Growth. Urban and Regional Planning in China. London: Routledge.2 See also the recently published book on the urban history of China:Lincoln, T. (2021): An Urban History of China. Cambridge: University Press.3 Saarinen, E. (1943): The City: Its Growth, Its Decay, Its Future. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.4 Soviet city planning concepts were partly rooted in the planning activities of German planners in the Soviet Union in the 1930s (such as Ernst May, Walter Gropius, Fred Forbát and Rudolf Wolters).5 Another comprehensive bibliography compiled by Yeh, A. G. O. (1999): Bibliography on Socioeconomic Development and Urban Development In China. Hong Kong: Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, University of Hong Kong.6 No list is final: Books translated into Chinese and missing from the list include, for example: Frick, D. (2006/2015): Theorie des Städtebaus. (Translated by Yi Xin).Hassenpflug, D. (2010): The Urban Code of China. Basel: Birkhäuser.Reicher, C.; Kunzmann, K. R.; Polívka, J.; Roost, F.; Wegener, M. (2011): Schichten einer Region: Kartenstücke zur räumlichen Struktur des Ruhrgebiets. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.Trieb, M. (1974/2021): Stadtgestaltung: Theorie und Praxis. In Chinese, Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (Translation: Yajin Zhang).However, books written by Manuel Castells, John Friedmann, Willem Salet, Louis Albrechts, Gerd Albers, François Ascher, Françoise Choay, Michael Batty, Rem Koolhaas, Tridib Banerjee, or Patsy Healey seem to still be on the waiting list for translations.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135717582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2023.2257489
Maciej J. Nowak, Artur Hołuj, Małgorzata Blaszke
AbstractThis paper deals with the issue of the impact of legislation on the spatial planning system of a country. The case of Poland was chosen as it provides very wide material in this respect (due to the numerous weaknesses of the Polish spatial planning law diagnosed in the literature). Three key regulations were identified in relation to three spatial planning instruments at the local level: studies of spatial development conditions and directions, local spatial plans, and decisions on building conditions. It was determined what the weaknesses of these provisions are, and what wider impact they have on the application of individual spatial planning instruments and consequently on the entire spatial planning system. The issue of externalities of spatial management was additionally analysed. The results provided a basis for extending a more universal scientific discussion on the possible, especially negative, impact of legislation on spatial planning systems. Additional informationNotes on contributorsMaciej J. NowakMaciej J. Nowak is a Professor and Head of the Department of Real Estate at the West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin. He is also a legal adviser dealing with the role of law in spatial planning. He is the author of a number of publications comparing institutional solutions of spatial planning systems in different countries. He also deals with the integration of the spatial planning sphere with the response of public policies to climate challenges.Artur HołujArtur Hołuj (PhD in Economics, DSc in Engineering Techniques and Technologies in Spatial Management) is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Spatial Management at the Krakow University of Economics. He is a research collaborator of the Centre for Research of Settlements and Urbanism (C.C.A.U.), Faculty of Geography, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. He has authored and co-authored scientific papers and books on spatial planning, economic and environmental aspects of spatial planning and externalities of spatial management.Małgorzata BlaszkeMałgorzata Blaszke is a PhD student and Assistant Professor at the Department of Real Estate at the West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin. She works on environmental and climatic determinants of spatial planning. She also has a research interest in real estate management. She is the author of numerous publications, including as part of an international team of authors.
摘要本文探讨立法对国家空间规划制度的影响问题。之所以选择波兰的案例，是因为它在这方面提供了非常广泛的材料(由于文献中诊断的波兰空间规划法的许多弱点)。在地方一级确定了与三个空间规划工具相关的三个关键规则:空间发展条件和方向的研究、地方空间规划和建筑条件的决定。已经确定了这些规定的弱点，以及它们对个别空间规划工具的应用，从而对整个空间规划系统所产生的更广泛的影响。此外，还分析了空间管理的外部性问题。研究结果为就立法对空间规划系统可能产生的影响，特别是负面影响展开更为普遍的科学讨论提供了基础。作者简介:maciej J. Nowak是位于什切钦的西波美拉尼亚理工大学的教授和房地产系主任。他也是一名处理法律在空间规划中的作用的法律顾问。他发表了多篇文章，比较了不同国家空间规划系统的制度性解决方案。他还研究了空间规划领域与应对气候挑战的公共政策的整合。Artur HołujArtur Hołuj(经济学博士，空间管理工程技术和技术理学博士)，克拉科夫经济大学空间管理系助理教授。他是罗马尼亚克卢日纳波卡Babeș-Bolyai大学地理学院聚落与城市化研究中心(C.C.A.U.)的研究合作者。他撰写和合作撰写了关于空间规划、空间规划的经济和环境方面以及空间管理的外部性的科学论文和书籍。Małgorzata BlaszkeMałgorzata Blaszke是位于什切青的西波美拉尼亚理工大学房地产系的博士生和助理教授。她研究空间规划的环境和气候决定因素。她还对房地产管理有研究兴趣。她是众多出版物的作者，包括作为国际作者团队的一员。
{"title":"Law as a factor generating weakness in the spatial planning system","authors":"Maciej J. Nowak, Artur Hołuj, Małgorzata Blaszke","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2257489","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257489","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper deals with the issue of the impact of legislation on the spatial planning system of a country. The case of Poland was chosen as it provides very wide material in this respect (due to the numerous weaknesses of the Polish spatial planning law diagnosed in the literature). Three key regulations were identified in relation to three spatial planning instruments at the local level: studies of spatial development conditions and directions, local spatial plans, and decisions on building conditions. It was determined what the weaknesses of these provisions are, and what wider impact they have on the application of individual spatial planning instruments and consequently on the entire spatial planning system. The issue of externalities of spatial management was additionally analysed. The results provided a basis for extending a more universal scientific discussion on the possible, especially negative, impact of legislation on spatial planning systems. Additional informationNotes on contributorsMaciej J. NowakMaciej J. Nowak is a Professor and Head of the Department of Real Estate at the West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin. He is also a legal adviser dealing with the role of law in spatial planning. He is the author of a number of publications comparing institutional solutions of spatial planning systems in different countries. He also deals with the integration of the spatial planning sphere with the response of public policies to climate challenges.Artur HołujArtur Hołuj (PhD in Economics, DSc in Engineering Techniques and Technologies in Spatial Management) is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Spatial Management at the Krakow University of Economics. He is a research collaborator of the Centre for Research of Settlements and Urbanism (C.C.A.U.), Faculty of Geography, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. He has authored and co-authored scientific papers and books on spatial planning, economic and environmental aspects of spatial planning and externalities of spatial management.Małgorzata BlaszkeMałgorzata Blaszke is a PhD student and Assistant Professor at the Department of Real Estate at the West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin. She works on environmental and climatic determinants of spatial planning. She also has a research interest in real estate management. She is the author of numerous publications, including as part of an international team of authors.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135717580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2023.2257488
Silvia Bolgherini, Greta Klotz
AbstractMunicipalities1 face increasing demands in terms of quality and efficiency of public services, but not all are able to meet these expectations. Horizontal governance strategies such as inter-municipal cooperation (IMC) and municipal amalgamations are often cited in the literature as possible solutions to these local challenges. Is this statement also shared by local political elites (mayors) or is it only a theoretical consideration? This article aims to investigate the extent to which IMC and amalgamations are considered helpful strategies in local governance. By applying to municipal horizontal strategies (MHS) the theoretical dimensions of Europeanness of elites, empirical evidence on the assessments of mayors in three subnational units of the Alpine area (Grisons, South Tyrol and Tyrol) are provided and discussed. Findings show that the evaluation of horizontal strategies is influenced by the perceived benefits of such strategies, prior experience, and the relevant context, thus supporting the theory. Other findings, however, refute some theoretical assumptions, such as, that difficult financial conditions should enhance amalgamation. In addition, while IMC is evaluated positively, amalgamation is not seen as an effective solution to local challenges. The Alpine area provides useful insight for further investigation of local elite research in particular territorial contexts. Notes1 In this article, we employ the term municipality since it is the most common in the international scientific literature to refer to this local authority. It is to be intended as «commune» in the Swiss case.2 Municipal merger is the unification of two or more pre-existing municipalities. It may result from the amalgamation of more units to form a new body, or from the incorporation of one or more units into one pre-existing municipality. Here, the term amalgamation will be used to include both.3 In this article by region, we refer to the subnational/substate entities, namely the subnational constitutional unit of each state, e.g., the regions in Italy, the states (Länder) in Austria, and the cantons in Switzerland.4 The so-called Gemeindeschreiberbefragung (questioning of Swiss administrative heads). Surveys have been carried out since 1988, see for further information: http://www.andreasladner.ch/uebersicht.htm or https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/OLM3QO (access date: 27. 06. 2022).5 For the sake of clarity, it is important to stress that we are interested here in how mayors evaluate (positive/negative attitude) the different strategies, and not why they evaluate them in a certain way. Therefore, otherwise important aspects, such as party politics and partisan considerations, ideological orientations, and political or instrumental calculations, for example, are not considered here.6 While in South Tyrol and Tyrol, there is only one type of municipality, in Switzerland, several types of municipalities are present, there
{"title":"Proceed with caution","authors":"Silvia Bolgherini, Greta Klotz","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2257488","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257488","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractMunicipalities1 face increasing demands in terms of quality and efficiency of public services, but not all are able to meet these expectations. Horizontal governance strategies such as inter-municipal cooperation (IMC) and municipal amalgamations are often cited in the literature as possible solutions to these local challenges. Is this statement also shared by local political elites (mayors) or is it only a theoretical consideration? This article aims to investigate the extent to which IMC and amalgamations are considered helpful strategies in local governance. By applying to municipal horizontal strategies (MHS) the theoretical dimensions of Europeanness of elites, empirical evidence on the assessments of mayors in three subnational units of the Alpine area (Grisons, South Tyrol and Tyrol) are provided and discussed. Findings show that the evaluation of horizontal strategies is influenced by the perceived benefits of such strategies, prior experience, and the relevant context, thus supporting the theory. Other findings, however, refute some theoretical assumptions, such as, that difficult financial conditions should enhance amalgamation. In addition, while IMC is evaluated positively, amalgamation is not seen as an effective solution to local challenges. The Alpine area provides useful insight for further investigation of local elite research in particular territorial contexts. Notes1 In this article, we employ the term municipality since it is the most common in the international scientific literature to refer to this local authority. It is to be intended as «commune» in the Swiss case.2 Municipal merger is the unification of two or more pre-existing municipalities. It may result from the amalgamation of more units to form a new body, or from the incorporation of one or more units into one pre-existing municipality. Here, the term amalgamation will be used to include both.3 In this article by region, we refer to the subnational/substate entities, namely the subnational constitutional unit of each state, e.g., the regions in Italy, the states (Länder) in Austria, and the cantons in Switzerland.4 The so-called Gemeindeschreiberbefragung (questioning of Swiss administrative heads). Surveys have been carried out since 1988, see for further information: http://www.andreasladner.ch/uebersicht.htm or https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/OLM3QO (access date: 27. 06. 2022).5 For the sake of clarity, it is important to stress that we are interested here in how mayors evaluate (positive/negative attitude) the different strategies, and not why they evaluate them in a certain way. Therefore, otherwise important aspects, such as party politics and partisan considerations, ideological orientations, and political or instrumental calculations, for example, are not considered here.6 While in South Tyrol and Tyrol, there is only one type of municipality, in Switzerland, several types of municipalities are present, there","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135717584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2023.2257481
Giancarlo Cotella
"Just green transitions – Practising utopia?." disP - The Planning Review, 59(2), pp. 4–5 Notes1 The European Green Deal is only the last step in conspicuous legislative and policy activities conducted by the EU Commission in the field of energy and the environment, following the inclusion of environmental competence in the treaties in the 1970s (Cotella et al. Citation2016).2 To achieve this, the EU has set intermediate targets, including a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels.3 The Just Transition Mechanism provides targeted support to help mobilise around €55 billion in the most affected regions over the period 2021–2027, to alleviate the socio-economic impact of the transition.4 In their thorough literature review on the matter, Samper et al. (Citation2021) point out that transitions are deeply political and involve considering the power relations and vested interests within energy systems.Additional informationNotes on contributorsGiancarlo CotellaGiancarlo Cotella is an Associate Professor of Spatial Planning at Politecnico di Torino and, since 2023, he has served as the Secretary General of the Association of European Schools of Planning. His research is positioned within comparative spatial planning studies, focusing, in particular, on EU multilevel territorial governance and the Europeanisation of spatial planning.
“仅仅是绿色转型——实践乌托邦?”disP - The Planning Review, 59(2)， pp. 4-5注释1欧洲绿色协议只是欧盟委员会在能源和环境领域进行的引人注目的立法和政策活动的最后一步，在20世纪70年代将环境能力纳入条约(Cotella等人)。Citation2016)。2为了实现这一目标，欧盟制定了中间目标，其中包括到2030年将温室气体排放量在1990年的水平上减少55%公正过渡机制提供有针对性的支持，帮助在2021-2027年期间在受影响最严重的地区动员约550亿欧元，以减轻过渡的社会经济影响Samper等人(Citation2021)在对这一问题进行深入的文献综述中指出，转型具有深刻的政治性，涉及到能源系统内的权力关系和既得利益。作者简介giancarlo Cotella是都灵理工大学空间规划副教授，自2023年以来，他一直担任欧洲规划学院协会秘书长。他的研究定位于比较空间规划研究，特别关注欧盟多层次领土治理和空间规划的欧洲化。
{"title":"Just green transitions – Practising utopia?","authors":"Giancarlo Cotella","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2257481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257481","url":null,"abstract":"\"Just green transitions – Practising utopia?.\" disP - The Planning Review, 59(2), pp. 4–5 Notes1 The European Green Deal is only the last step in conspicuous legislative and policy activities conducted by the EU Commission in the field of energy and the environment, following the inclusion of environmental competence in the treaties in the 1970s (Cotella et al. Citation2016).2 To achieve this, the EU has set intermediate targets, including a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels.3 The Just Transition Mechanism provides targeted support to help mobilise around €55 billion in the most affected regions over the period 2021–2027, to alleviate the socio-economic impact of the transition.4 In their thorough literature review on the matter, Samper et al. (Citation2021) point out that transitions are deeply political and involve considering the power relations and vested interests within energy systems.Additional informationNotes on contributorsGiancarlo CotellaGiancarlo Cotella is an Associate Professor of Spatial Planning at Politecnico di Torino and, since 2023, he has served as the Secretary General of the Association of European Schools of Planning. His research is positioned within comparative spatial planning studies, focusing, in particular, on EU multilevel territorial governance and the Europeanisation of spatial planning.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135717389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2023.2257486
Lina Berglund-Snodgrass, Mats Fred, Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren
Innovation platforms are new collaborative organisations in the urban development context that aim to support innovation. They assemble different organisations and actors and act as flexible intermediary links between the same. By being intrinsically flexible and adaptable in form and function, the innovation platform can be seen as an organisational accomplishment or enactment of adaptive planning. Central to adaptive planning is the balance between organisational flexibility and stability, which is also intrinsic to any public innovation work. Public sector innovations are often perceived to require open and experimental trial and error strategies – while their institutional setting simultaneously requires stability. The aim of this article is to analyse how individuals working in innovation platforms make sense of their organisation at the intersection of adaptability and stability. We describe the tension between adaptability and stability inherent to innovation platforms, as the platforms are set to facilitate relationships between actors while maintaining their role as an independent organisation. This article is based on an in-depth multiple-case study of 15 innovation platforms in the Nordic countries, consisting of interviews with representatives, as well as extensive desktop material and participant observations. By adopting an organisational and sense-making perspective, we analyse how people working in platforms enact their organisations and their environment through processes of belief and action-driven sense-making. We conclude that despite innovation platforms’ strong advocacy – and sense-making – in terms of adaptability and chameleon-like characteristics, stability is enacted through making sense of themselves as a legitimate and necessary position/node in urban planning and development.
{"title":"In-between stability and adaptability","authors":"Lina Berglund-Snodgrass, Mats Fred, Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2257486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257486","url":null,"abstract":"Innovation platforms are new collaborative organisations in the urban development context that aim to support innovation. They assemble different organisations and actors and act as flexible intermediary links between the same. By being intrinsically flexible and adaptable in form and function, the innovation platform can be seen as an organisational accomplishment or enactment of adaptive planning. Central to adaptive planning is the balance between organisational flexibility and stability, which is also intrinsic to any public innovation work. Public sector innovations are often perceived to require open and experimental trial and error strategies – while their institutional setting simultaneously requires stability. The aim of this article is to analyse how individuals working in innovation platforms make sense of their organisation at the intersection of adaptability and stability. We describe the tension between adaptability and stability inherent to innovation platforms, as the platforms are set to facilitate relationships between actors while maintaining their role as an independent organisation. This article is based on an in-depth multiple-case study of 15 innovation platforms in the Nordic countries, consisting of interviews with representatives, as well as extensive desktop material and participant observations. By adopting an organisational and sense-making perspective, we analyse how people working in platforms enact their organisations and their environment through processes of belief and action-driven sense-making. We conclude that despite innovation platforms’ strong advocacy – and sense-making – in terms of adaptability and chameleon-like characteristics, stability is enacted through making sense of themselves as a legitimate and necessary position/node in urban planning and development.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"270 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135717390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2023.2229624
G. Cotella
I’ve been an enthusiastic reader of disP – The Planning Review since the early 2000s when, as a young doctoral student, I learned to appreciate the international comparative scope of the journal, its European focus and its digressions addressing extra-European contexts and planning practices. In this light, I am delighted to serve as a columnist for the journal and, even more so, to do this during a year that represents an important watershed for planning and planners in Europe. In particular, 2023 is the first year to finally look at COVID-19 from the rear-view mirror. In the early months of 2022, the virus diffusion peaked at over 2 million new cases per day, with around 10 000 daily deaths. Now, daily cases worldwide are less than 200 000, and it is time to sit down and reflect on the challenges that await us when planning the post-pandemic future of our cities and territories.
自21世纪初以来，我一直是《规划评论》(disP - The Planning Review)的热心读者。当时，作为一名年轻的博士生，我学会了欣赏该杂志的国际比较范围、它对欧洲的关注以及它对欧洲以外背景和规划实践的离题。有鉴于此，我很高兴担任该杂志的专栏作家，更高兴的是，在欧洲规划和规划者的一个重要分水岭的这一年里做这件事。特别是，2023年是终于从后视镜看新冠肺炎的第一年。在2022年的头几个月，病毒扩散达到了每天200多万新病例的高峰，每天约有1万人死亡。现在，全世界每天的病例不到20万，现在是时候坐下来，在规划我们城市和领土大流行后的未来时，思考等待我们的挑战。
{"title":"Planning the post-pandemic","authors":"G. Cotella","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2023.2229624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2229624","url":null,"abstract":"I’ve been an enthusiastic reader of disP – The Planning Review since the early 2000s when, as a young doctoral student, I learned to appreciate the international comparative scope of the journal, its European focus and its digressions addressing extra-European contexts and planning practices. In this light, I am delighted to serve as a columnist for the journal and, even more so, to do this during a year that represents an important watershed for planning and planners in Europe. In particular, 2023 is the first year to finally look at COVID-19 from the rear-view mirror. In the early months of 2022, the virus diffusion peaked at over 2 million new cases per day, with around 10 000 daily deaths. Now, daily cases worldwide are less than 200 000, and it is time to sit down and reflect on the challenges that await us when planning the post-pandemic future of our cities and territories.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132184528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：