Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2022.2091856
W. Siebel
Die Landschaft in Deutschland ist vielfältig. Städte, Dörfe r, Wälder, landwirt- schaftliche Nutzflächen, durchzogen von Verkehrs- und Energieversorgungs-trassen. Unsere räumlichen Lebensgrundlagen sind stetem Wandel unterworfen. Siedlungen werden erweitert, Tagebaugebiete aufgegeben. Die Energiewende bringt Windkraftanlagen und Solarfelder. Verkehrstrassen, Wohn- und Gewerbegebiete werden auf landwirtschaftlichen Nutzflächen gebaut. Dabei ist Boden eine begrenzte Ressource. Die Landschaft soll nicht „zersiedelt“ werden und Kulturlandschaften erhalten bleiben. Es bedarf einer guten Raumordnung, um die gesellschaftlich notwen- dige Balance zwischen begründeten Nutzungsansprüchen und nachhaltiger Entwicklung zu gestalten. Die Ausstellung „Die Gestalt des Raumes – Landschaften Deutschlands als Abbilder der Gesellschaft“ zeigt Beispiele dieses schwierigen Spagats zwischen Bewahrung und Entwicklung. Die Ausstellung beruht auf dem gleichnamigen Buch von Wendelin Strubelt, Fabian Dosch und Gotthard Meinel mit Fotos von Jürgen Hohmuth und Marcus Fehse, erschienen 2022 im Wasmuth & Zohlen Verlag.
{"title":"Die Gestalt des Raumes","authors":"W. Siebel","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2022.2091856","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2091856","url":null,"abstract":"Die Landschaft in Deutschland ist vielfältig. Städte, Dörfe r, Wälder, landwirt- schaftliche Nutzflächen, durchzogen von Verkehrs- und Energieversorgungs-trassen. Unsere räumlichen Lebensgrundlagen sind stetem Wandel unterworfen. Siedlungen werden erweitert, Tagebaugebiete aufgegeben. Die Energiewende bringt Windkraftanlagen und Solarfelder. Verkehrstrassen, Wohn- und Gewerbegebiete werden auf landwirtschaftlichen Nutzflächen gebaut. Dabei ist Boden eine begrenzte Ressource. Die Landschaft soll nicht „zersiedelt“ werden und Kulturlandschaften erhalten bleiben. Es bedarf einer guten Raumordnung, um die gesellschaftlich notwen- dige Balance zwischen begründeten Nutzungsansprüchen und nachhaltiger Entwicklung zu gestalten. Die Ausstellung „Die Gestalt des Raumes – Landschaften Deutschlands als Abbilder der Gesellschaft“ zeigt Beispiele dieses schwierigen Spagats zwischen Bewahrung und Entwicklung. Die Ausstellung beruht auf dem gleichnamigen Buch von Wendelin Strubelt, Fabian Dosch und Gotthard Meinel mit Fotos von Jürgen Hohmuth und Marcus Fehse, erschienen 2022 im Wasmuth & Zohlen Verlag.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122940399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2022.2091854
Sarah Klepp, A. Million
Abstract The development of educational infrastructure is increasingly linked to aspects of urban planning, urban design and architecture and discussed within the concept of educational landscapes, which links formal and non-formal educational settings and learning processes to spatial design. In practice, the Leitbild and design of educational campuses that are favoured by multi-professional stakeholders is one that also serves and is open to the neighbourhood. The aim of this research is to investigate the significance of the campus model and how the different interests and goals of the stakeholders in relation to the guiding idea of an initially openly conceived educational campus are negotiated in the process of planning and implementation. Empirical results from a case study are derived from an analysis of planning documents, site visits and interviews. The campus offers a robust model for educational policy and pedagogical as well as the planning and urban development goals of the stakeholders, and can also withstand ambivalent feelings and actions about aims and objectives within a campus development. The open educational campus can only be implemented in part because there is a lack of management strategies regarding how the openness can function and be maintained in everyday life on the campus. Instead, stakeholders see and accept the necessity of internal and external boundaries (especially fencing) without developing and negotiating far-reaching ideas about how these boundaries can be created productively as an educational space. English title: The campus as an open educational landscape. Perspectives and expectations for the design of neighbourhoods as educational spaces
教育基础设施的发展越来越多地与城市规划、城市设计和建筑的各个方面联系在一起，并在教育景观的概念中进行讨论，教育景观将正式和非正式的教育环境和学习过程与空间设计联系起来。在实践中，教育校园的布局和设计受到多专业利益相关者的青睐，同时也为社区服务并向社区开放。本研究的目的是探讨校园模式的意义，以及在规划和实施过程中，利益相关者的不同利益和目标是如何与一个最初公开构想的教育校园的指导思想相关联的。案例研究的实证结果来源于对规划文件、实地考察和访谈的分析。校园为利益相关者的教育政策、教学、规划和城市发展目标提供了一个强大的模型，也可以承受校园发展中关于目标和目标的矛盾情绪和行动。开放式教育校园之所以能够得以实施，部分原因在于缺乏在校园日常生活中如何发挥和保持开放性的管理策略。相反，利益相关者看到并接受了内部和外部边界(特别是围栏)的必要性，而没有发展和协商关于如何将这些边界作为教育空间有效地创建的深远想法。英文标题:The campus as a open educational landscape。社区作为教育空间设计的观点和期望
{"title":"Der Campus als offene Bildungslandschaft","authors":"Sarah Klepp, A. Million","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2022.2091854","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2091854","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The development of educational infrastructure is increasingly linked to aspects of urban planning, urban design and architecture and discussed within the concept of educational landscapes, which links formal and non-formal educational settings and learning processes to spatial design. In practice, the Leitbild and design of educational campuses that are favoured by multi-professional stakeholders is one that also serves and is open to the neighbourhood. The aim of this research is to investigate the significance of the campus model and how the different interests and goals of the stakeholders in relation to the guiding idea of an initially openly conceived educational campus are negotiated in the process of planning and implementation. Empirical results from a case study are derived from an analysis of planning documents, site visits and interviews. The campus offers a robust model for educational policy and pedagogical as well as the planning and urban development goals of the stakeholders, and can also withstand ambivalent feelings and actions about aims and objectives within a campus development. The open educational campus can only be implemented in part because there is a lack of management strategies regarding how the openness can function and be maintained in everyday life on the campus. Instead, stakeholders see and accept the necessity of internal and external boundaries (especially fencing) without developing and negotiating far-reaching ideas about how these boundaries can be created productively as an educational space. English title: The campus as an open educational landscape. Perspectives and expectations for the design of neighbourhoods as educational spaces","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131538114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2022.2091850
M. Mazzoleni
Abstract Does public participation matter in planning? Although the paradigm of participation has strengthened, its practical implementation is not always successful. Critical literature stresses that public engagement is often ineffective since planning choices are mainly influenced by the most affluent groups. While most studies focus on collaborative or innovative cases of participation in urban design and transformation, this article focuses on local comprehensive planning and the statutory involvement of the public and interest groups. To assess their influence, their access to the planning process is analysed with data from a survey of elected officers and staff in the municipalities of the largest region in Italy. It is inferred that the access for non-governmental actors predicts the latter’s impact on policy decisions. Participation from citizens and stakeholders through the formal and legally regulated mechanisms does not seem to be empty rhetoric: their contributions appear to be taken into consideration. In most cases, they manage to make an impact on decision-makers by collaborating with them, while confrontation is seldom experienced. Residents and economic associations are the most influential players, while political parties are the least prominent ones. This implies that particular interests and expectations, manifested by many residents and stakeholders, may hinder policymakers striving to plan for the wider community’s benefit.
{"title":"Access and Influence in Planning","authors":"M. Mazzoleni","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2022.2091850","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2091850","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Does public participation matter in planning? Although the paradigm of participation has strengthened, its practical implementation is not always successful. Critical literature stresses that public engagement is often ineffective since planning choices are mainly influenced by the most affluent groups. While most studies focus on collaborative or innovative cases of participation in urban design and transformation, this article focuses on local comprehensive planning and the statutory involvement of the public and interest groups. To assess their influence, their access to the planning process is analysed with data from a survey of elected officers and staff in the municipalities of the largest region in Italy. It is inferred that the access for non-governmental actors predicts the latter’s impact on policy decisions. Participation from citizens and stakeholders through the formal and legally regulated mechanisms does not seem to be empty rhetoric: their contributions appear to be taken into consideration. In most cases, they manage to make an impact on decision-makers by collaborating with them, while confrontation is seldom experienced. Residents and economic associations are the most influential players, while political parties are the least prominent ones. This implies that particular interests and expectations, manifested by many residents and stakeholders, may hinder policymakers striving to plan for the wider community’s benefit.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121204483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2022.2091848
Marie-Luise Baldin, H. Sinning
Abstract Heat resilience of cities has been gaining importance increasingly due to rising temperatures and lasting heat waves in the context of climate change. Therefore, the need to take climate action and implement effective adaption measures has become more urgent. In addition, the Covid-19 pandemic has been promoting strategies to increase resilience, e.g. by improving both urban green and health prevention, which can be seen as synergetic to climate adaptation. Despite a broad consensus that immediate climate action is needed, progress in implementation is advancing rather slowly. By investigating case studies in Dresden and Erfurt, Germany, this article points out barriers in implementing adaption measures and within the communication between stakeholders in the adaption process. The study has found insufficiencies in the current standing of climate adaption in cities’ responsibilities and in conflict with competing interests, its integration into administrative tasks and the cross-departmental, collaborative approach in planning and implementation of adaption measures. Furthermore, a relevant obstacle has been identified in the holding on to traditional urban design principles that conflict with climate adaption to urban heat. The analysis is followed by a discussion of possible solutions to these obstacles, which are contextualized by theorical approach of Climate Adaption Governance by reviewing available instruments and examining the relations between key stakeholders. English title: Heat-resilient cities: Why does the implementation not succeed? Governance analysis of implementation and communication problems using the case studies of Dresden and Erfurt
{"title":"Hitzeresiliente Städte: Warum gelingt die Umsetzung nicht?","authors":"Marie-Luise Baldin, H. Sinning","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2022.2091848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2091848","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Heat resilience of cities has been gaining importance increasingly due to rising temperatures and lasting heat waves in the context of climate change. Therefore, the need to take climate action and implement effective adaption measures has become more urgent. In addition, the Covid-19 pandemic has been promoting strategies to increase resilience, e.g. by improving both urban green and health prevention, which can be seen as synergetic to climate adaptation. Despite a broad consensus that immediate climate action is needed, progress in implementation is advancing rather slowly. By investigating case studies in Dresden and Erfurt, Germany, this article points out barriers in implementing adaption measures and within the communication between stakeholders in the adaption process. The study has found insufficiencies in the current standing of climate adaption in cities’ responsibilities and in conflict with competing interests, its integration into administrative tasks and the cross-departmental, collaborative approach in planning and implementation of adaption measures. Furthermore, a relevant obstacle has been identified in the holding on to traditional urban design principles that conflict with climate adaption to urban heat. The analysis is followed by a discussion of possible solutions to these obstacles, which are contextualized by theorical approach of Climate Adaption Governance by reviewing available instruments and examining the relations between key stakeholders. English title: Heat-resilient cities: Why does the implementation not succeed? Governance analysis of implementation and communication problems using the case studies of Dresden and Erfurt","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121450093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2022.2091852
S. Kabisch, J. Pössneck
Abstract Large housing estates (LHEs) in eastern Germany are often stigmatised in media and public discourses. They are considered symbols of the state-socialist era. Furthermore, LHEs are usually presented as monotonous entities without inner variation, including in scientific literature. This poses the risk of a general and thoughtless stigmatisation of these estates. This paper focuses on the concept of territorial stigmatisation. Although stigmatised from the outside, in many cases the internal image contrasts with the external one. Previous literature indicates four main aspects that need more attention in scientific studies on LHEs and territorial stigmatisation: (1) a longterm perspective including the area’s historical development, (2) the analysis and evaluation of micro-scale data independent of common statistical boundaries, (3) the residents’ perceptions of their living environment, and (4) a more critical reflection in the academic discourse about one’s own role as a knowledge producer. By using the Leipzig-Grünau LHE as an example, we explore, first, how the internal image has changed over time, and second, whether micro-scale differences within the estate can be identified. We draw on findings of a long-term study investigating the development of the Leipzig-Grünau LHE since 1979. The results illustrate that the respective historical context has had a major influence on image generation over time. Furthermore, a micro-scale analysis reveals that even subspaces in immediate proximity differ with regard to socio-demographic characteristics, the housing and neighbourhood conditions and ownership. In particular, the residents perceive their living environment in a more nuanced way, which influences their image of the estate.
{"title":"Various Images Versus the Stigma of Large Housing Estates: The Leipzig-Grünau Example","authors":"S. Kabisch, J. Pössneck","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2022.2091852","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2091852","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Large housing estates (LHEs) in eastern Germany are often stigmatised in media and public discourses. They are considered symbols of the state-socialist era. Furthermore, LHEs are usually presented as monotonous entities without inner variation, including in scientific literature. This poses the risk of a general and thoughtless stigmatisation of these estates. This paper focuses on the concept of territorial stigmatisation. Although stigmatised from the outside, in many cases the internal image contrasts with the external one. Previous literature indicates four main aspects that need more attention in scientific studies on LHEs and territorial stigmatisation: (1) a longterm perspective including the area’s historical development, (2) the analysis and evaluation of micro-scale data independent of common statistical boundaries, (3) the residents’ perceptions of their living environment, and (4) a more critical reflection in the academic discourse about one’s own role as a knowledge producer. By using the Leipzig-Grünau LHE as an example, we explore, first, how the internal image has changed over time, and second, whether micro-scale differences within the estate can be identified. We draw on findings of a long-term study investigating the development of the Leipzig-Grünau LHE since 1979. The results illustrate that the respective historical context has had a major influence on image generation over time. Furthermore, a micro-scale analysis reveals that even subspaces in immediate proximity differ with regard to socio-demographic characteristics, the housing and neighbourhood conditions and ownership. In particular, the residents perceive their living environment in a more nuanced way, which influences their image of the estate.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122169324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2022.2091855
Dieter Frick
Die Anregung zu diesem Beitrag kommt von einer vor kurzem erschienenen Publikation Berlin & Berlin. Stadtplanung und Städtebau nach dem Mauer fall im Gespräch, herausgegeben von Friedemann Kunst (Kunst 2021). Die ursprüngliche Absicht, eine Besprechung des Buches zu schreiben, hat sich zusehends zu einem Aufsatz über die besondere, ja einmalige Situation von Stadtplanung und Städte bau in Berlin entwickelt. Nach dreissig Jahren erlangt dieser kurze Zeitabschnitt möglicherweise wegweisenden Charakter. Das Buch enthält, von der Fachjournalistin Dagmar Hoetzel durchgeführt, Interviews mit 15 Zeitzeugen, die nach der Vereinigung der Stadt im Jahr 1990 intensiv am Geschehen beteiligt waren (Namen siehe im Anhang). Die Texte zeichnen nach, welche Bedeutung die damaligen Planungsentscheidungen für die Stadt gehabt haben und bis heute haben, insbesondere von welcher Dynamik in diesen Jahren die Stadtentwicklung und die damit eng verbundenen Aufgaben der Stadtplanung und des Städtebaus bestimmt waren. «Im Rückblick auf die Jahre nach dem Mauerfall zeigt sich eine Dichte an Aufgaben und politischem Entscheidungsbedarf, der in der Nachkriegszeit in Deutschland ohne Vorbild ist. Hier liegen nun durch Zeit und individuelle Wertungen gleichsam gefilterte und gewichtete Fakten vor. Aus dem Zusammenspiel von Fakten und persönlich Erlebtem sind sehr individuelle Erzählungen entstanden. Sie fügen sich zu einem farbigen Bild über eine Zeit intensiver Arbeit an der Zukunft Berlins mit allen Widersprüchen und Konflikten» (Friedemann Kunst in seiner Einführung zur Publikation Berlin & Berlin). Die verschiedenen Sichtweisen in den 15 Beiträgen sind nicht zuletzt durch die Herkunft der Autorinnen und Autoren (nach damaligem Stand) bestimmt. Sechs von ihnen kamen aus der Bauund Planungsverwaltung, zwei aus freien Planungsbüros, vier aus Einrichtungen der Forschung und Lehre, je einer aus der Architekturkritik, der Wohnungswirtschaft und der Poli tik. Nur vier der Autorinnen und Autoren waren Ost-Berliner. Mit einer Ausnahme sind sie alle Mitglieder der Deutschen Akademie für Städtebau und Landesplanung, Landesgruppe BerlinBranden burg. Sie werden im Folgenden zahlreich zitiert.
{"title":"Berlin 1990 – Stadtplanung im Aufbruch","authors":"Dieter Frick","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2022.2091855","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2022.2091855","url":null,"abstract":"Die Anregung zu diesem Beitrag kommt von einer vor kurzem erschienenen Publikation Berlin & Berlin. Stadtplanung und Städtebau nach dem Mauer fall im Gespräch, herausgegeben von Friedemann Kunst (Kunst 2021). Die ursprüngliche Absicht, eine Besprechung des Buches zu schreiben, hat sich zusehends zu einem Aufsatz über die besondere, ja einmalige Situation von Stadtplanung und Städte bau in Berlin entwickelt. Nach dreissig Jahren erlangt dieser kurze Zeitabschnitt möglicherweise wegweisenden Charakter. Das Buch enthält, von der Fachjournalistin Dagmar Hoetzel durchgeführt, Interviews mit 15 Zeitzeugen, die nach der Vereinigung der Stadt im Jahr 1990 intensiv am Geschehen beteiligt waren (Namen siehe im Anhang). Die Texte zeichnen nach, welche Bedeutung die damaligen Planungsentscheidungen für die Stadt gehabt haben und bis heute haben, insbesondere von welcher Dynamik in diesen Jahren die Stadtentwicklung und die damit eng verbundenen Aufgaben der Stadtplanung und des Städtebaus bestimmt waren. «Im Rückblick auf die Jahre nach dem Mauerfall zeigt sich eine Dichte an Aufgaben und politischem Entscheidungsbedarf, der in der Nachkriegszeit in Deutschland ohne Vorbild ist. Hier liegen nun durch Zeit und individuelle Wertungen gleichsam gefilterte und gewichtete Fakten vor. Aus dem Zusammenspiel von Fakten und persönlich Erlebtem sind sehr individuelle Erzählungen entstanden. Sie fügen sich zu einem farbigen Bild über eine Zeit intensiver Arbeit an der Zukunft Berlins mit allen Widersprüchen und Konflikten» (Friedemann Kunst in seiner Einführung zur Publikation Berlin & Berlin). Die verschiedenen Sichtweisen in den 15 Beiträgen sind nicht zuletzt durch die Herkunft der Autorinnen und Autoren (nach damaligem Stand) bestimmt. Sechs von ihnen kamen aus der Bauund Planungsverwaltung, zwei aus freien Planungsbüros, vier aus Einrichtungen der Forschung und Lehre, je einer aus der Architekturkritik, der Wohnungswirtschaft und der Poli tik. Nur vier der Autorinnen und Autoren waren Ost-Berliner. Mit einer Ausnahme sind sie alle Mitglieder der Deutschen Akademie für Städtebau und Landesplanung, Landesgruppe BerlinBranden burg. Sie werden im Folgenden zahlreich zitiert.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116056232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2021.2060575
Yi Xin, K. Kunzmann
Abstract For the past two years, the Covid-19 pandemic has considerably paralysed public life in Europe. Planners and urban researchers have been speculating for months about the consequences of the pandemic for urban development and urban planning: for mobility in the city, for work and housing, for culture and the cultural industry, for the financial budgets of municipalities and the consequences for tourism and rural areas. Currently, the question of whether, after the pandemic, everything will remain as it was, or whether anything will change and, if so, what and where, is dominating the discussion in public and expert circles. The aim of this paper is to describe how cities in China reacted to the outbreak of Covid-19, what restrictions people in Chinese cities had to live with temporarily and how they reacted to these, what restrictions the local economy had to take on and why Chinese cities were apparently better prepared for the epidemic than European cities. From a European perspective, it is also interesting to assess what will change in China’s cities after the pandemic and whether and which cities in Europe can learn from this.
{"title":"Covid-19 und Stadtentwicklung in China","authors":"Yi Xin, K. Kunzmann","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2021.2060575","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.2060575","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For the past two years, the Covid-19 pandemic has considerably paralysed public life in Europe. Planners and urban researchers have been speculating for months about the consequences of the pandemic for urban development and urban planning: for mobility in the city, for work and housing, for culture and the cultural industry, for the financial budgets of municipalities and the consequences for tourism and rural areas. Currently, the question of whether, after the pandemic, everything will remain as it was, or whether anything will change and, if so, what and where, is dominating the discussion in public and expert circles. The aim of this paper is to describe how cities in China reacted to the outbreak of Covid-19, what restrictions people in Chinese cities had to live with temporarily and how they reacted to these, what restrictions the local economy had to take on and why Chinese cities were apparently better prepared for the epidemic than European cities. From a European perspective, it is also interesting to assess what will change in China’s cities after the pandemic and whether and which cities in Europe can learn from this.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125957200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2021.2060581
K. Kunzmann
Covid-19 has alarmed the world and forced local economies to reorganise production and services, citizens to reorganise their daily lives, work habits and entertainment preferences and universities to organise online education or hybrid forms of teaching. It has also debarred the community of European planning educators from two annual congresses. This seems to have caused some planning educators at AESOP member schools in Europe to reflect on the future of an association that is highly dependent on face-to-face communication at its annual congresses. Will everything return to a new normal after the pandemic has been successfully tamed? The following comments raise some questions and present some pathways into the future.
{"title":"What Does the Future Hold for a Post-Covid AESOP?","authors":"K. Kunzmann","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2021.2060581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.2060581","url":null,"abstract":"Covid-19 has alarmed the world and forced local economies to reorganise production and services, citizens to reorganise their daily lives, work habits and entertainment preferences and universities to organise online education or hybrid forms of teaching. It has also debarred the community of European planning educators from two annual congresses. This seems to have caused some planning educators at AESOP member schools in Europe to reflect on the future of an association that is highly dependent on face-to-face communication at its annual congresses. Will everything return to a new normal after the pandemic has been successfully tamed? The following comments raise some questions and present some pathways into the future.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128287572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-02DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2021.2060578
F. Viallon, Pierre-Henri Bombenger, Denis Leroy, Stéphane Nahrath
Abstract Land-use policies aim to control urban sprawl. Such control may involve different regulatory and market-based policy instruments, which compensate for and/or transfer development rights. In Switzerland, compensation for development rights has remained legally hazardous; discussions on the transfer of development rights have primarily considered Transferable Development Rights (TDR) as a means to transfer ill-placed development rights to more suitable areas. However, other instruments, such as Land Improvement Syndicates (LIS), may prove more appropriate in the Swiss context. Drawing upon a literature review and attempts to conceptualise a new instrument, the present paper discusses theoretical and institutional characteristics of TDR and LIS. We review both instruments’ capacity to fight urban sprawl and analyse their respective compatibility with the Swiss institutional setting. In an attempt to put forward the strengths and overcome the weaknesses of both instruments, we conceptualise a new instrument: Multi-Site Land Improvement Syndicates (MSLIS). We discuss potentials and limits of MSLIS under the Swiss institutional setting, in particular, when transferring rights across jurisdictions. We conclude with lessons on re-locating development rights in a context of strong property rights, such as in Switzerland. In particular, we underline a) the different vehicles MSLIS offer for transferring rights, b) the specific decisional rules of the instrument, and c) its compatibility with legal obligations of compensation and the guarantee of property. These insights may be of interest to non-Swiss planning researchers and practitioners working on development rights re-location.
{"title":"Transferring Development Rights: Lessons and Suggestions from Switzerland","authors":"F. Viallon, Pierre-Henri Bombenger, Denis Leroy, Stéphane Nahrath","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2021.2060578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.2060578","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Land-use policies aim to control urban sprawl. Such control may involve different regulatory and market-based policy instruments, which compensate for and/or transfer development rights. In Switzerland, compensation for development rights has remained legally hazardous; discussions on the transfer of development rights have primarily considered Transferable Development Rights (TDR) as a means to transfer ill-placed development rights to more suitable areas. However, other instruments, such as Land Improvement Syndicates (LIS), may prove more appropriate in the Swiss context. Drawing upon a literature review and attempts to conceptualise a new instrument, the present paper discusses theoretical and institutional characteristics of TDR and LIS. We review both instruments’ capacity to fight urban sprawl and analyse their respective compatibility with the Swiss institutional setting. In an attempt to put forward the strengths and overcome the weaknesses of both instruments, we conceptualise a new instrument: Multi-Site Land Improvement Syndicates (MSLIS). We discuss potentials and limits of MSLIS under the Swiss institutional setting, in particular, when transferring rights across jurisdictions. We conclude with lessons on re-locating development rights in a context of strong property rights, such as in Switzerland. In particular, we underline a) the different vehicles MSLIS offer for transferring rights, b) the specific decisional rules of the instrument, and c) its compatibility with legal obligations of compensation and the guarantee of property. These insights may be of interest to non-Swiss planning researchers and practitioners working on development rights re-location.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121209828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：