首页 > 最新文献

Schizophrenia Research-Cognition最新文献

英文 中文
Equivalence verification of the electronic version of the Chinese Brief Cognitive Test (C-BCT): Focus on Chinese schizophrenia populations 中文简短认知测验(C-BCT)电子版本的等效性验证:以中国精神分裂症人群为研究对象
IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100386
Han Han , Shuling Ye , Mengjuan Xie , Xin Yu , Renrong Wu , Dengtang Liu , Shaohua Hu , Yong Xu , Huanzhong Liu , Xijin Wang , Gang Zhu , Huaning Wang , Shaohong Zou , Tao Li , Wanjun Guo , Xiufeng Xu , Yuqi Cheng , Yi Li , Juan Yang , Min Peng , Chuan Shi

Objective

To complete the preparation of the electronic version of C-BCT, verifying the criterion validity of the electronic version of C-BCT.

Methods

747 healthy subjects and 139 schizophrenics completed the electronic version of C-BCT and MCCB. To measure psychotic symptoms and severity, patients with schizophrenia completed the PANSS scale. Mean, standard deviation, percentage, etc. were used to describe demographic variables. One-way analysis of variance and independent sample t-test were used to compare differences between groups. MCCB as a calibration tool, criterion validity was examined using Pearson product moment correlations.

Results

In the equivalence analysis of the healthy group, all tests have good calibration validity (p < 0.01). SC and TMT-A showed moderate correlation (r- value ranged from 0.572 to 0.651, p < 0.01), DS showed a weak correlation(r = 0.373, p < 0.01), CPT showed a weak correlation (r- value ranged from 0.219 to 0.444, p < 0.01), the comprehensive scores of the two sets of cognitive tools showed a strong correlation (r = 0.739, p < 0.01). In the equivalence analysis of the patient group, TMT-A and SC showed strong correlation (r- value ranged from 0.754 to 0.803, p < 0.01), DS showed a weak correlation (r = 0.381, p < 0.01), the cognitive tools comprehensive score was significantly strong correlation (r = 0.755, p < 0.01), there was no correlation between CPT(p > 0.05). In the healthy group, there was a correlation between the scores of each subtest of the electronic version of C-BCT and the comprehensive scores of the two cognition tools, (r- value ranged from 0.261 to 0.824, p < 0.01). In the patient group, there was a correlation between the scores of each subtest and the comprehensive scores of the two tools,(r- value ranged from 0.266 to 0.778, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The electronic version of C-BCT has been compiled. The electronic version of the C-BCT performs well in overall calibration validity and could be used to assess the cognitive function of schizophrenia.
目的完成C-BCT电子版的编制,验证C-BCT电子版的标准效度。方法对747名健康受试者和139名精神分裂症患者进行C-BCT和MCCB电子版测试。为了测量精神分裂症的症状和严重程度,精神分裂症患者完成了PANSS量表。用均值、标准差、百分比等来描述人口统计变量。组间差异比较采用单因素方差分析和独立样本t检验。MCCB作为校准工具,使用Pearson积矩相关检验标准效度。结果在健康组的等效性分析中,各试验的标度均较好(p < 0.01)。SC与TMT-A呈中度相关(r值为0.572 ~ 0.651,p < 0.01), DS呈弱相关(r值为0.373,p < 0.01), CPT呈弱相关(r值为0.219 ~ 0.444,p < 0.01),两组认知工具综合得分呈强相关(r = 0.739, p < 0.01)。在患者组的等效性分析中,TMT-A与SC呈强相关(r值范围为0.754 ~ 0.803,p < 0.01), DS呈弱相关(r = 0.381, p < 0.01),认知工具综合评分呈显著强相关(r = 0.755, p < 0.01), CPT与CPT无相关性(p < 0.05)。健康组C-BCT电子版各单项测试得分与两种认知工具综合得分均存在相关性(r值为0.261 ~ 0.824,p < 0.01)。在患者组中,各亚测试得分与两种工具的综合得分存在相关性(r值为0.266 ~ 0.778,p < 0.01)。结论C-BCT电子版已编制完成。电子版C-BCT在整体校正效度上表现良好,可用于评估精神分裂症的认知功能。
{"title":"Equivalence verification of the electronic version of the Chinese Brief Cognitive Test (C-BCT): Focus on Chinese schizophrenia populations","authors":"Han Han ,&nbsp;Shuling Ye ,&nbsp;Mengjuan Xie ,&nbsp;Xin Yu ,&nbsp;Renrong Wu ,&nbsp;Dengtang Liu ,&nbsp;Shaohua Hu ,&nbsp;Yong Xu ,&nbsp;Huanzhong Liu ,&nbsp;Xijin Wang ,&nbsp;Gang Zhu ,&nbsp;Huaning Wang ,&nbsp;Shaohong Zou ,&nbsp;Tao Li ,&nbsp;Wanjun Guo ,&nbsp;Xiufeng Xu ,&nbsp;Yuqi Cheng ,&nbsp;Yi Li ,&nbsp;Juan Yang ,&nbsp;Min Peng ,&nbsp;Chuan Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100386","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100386","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To complete the preparation of the electronic version of C-BCT, verifying the criterion validity of the electronic version of C-BCT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>747 healthy subjects and 139 schizophrenics completed the electronic version of C-BCT and MCCB. To measure psychotic symptoms and severity, patients with schizophrenia completed the PANSS scale. Mean, standard deviation, percentage, etc. were used to describe demographic variables. One-way analysis of variance and independent sample <em>t-</em>test were used to compare differences between groups. MCCB as a calibration tool, criterion validity was examined using Pearson product moment correlations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the equivalence analysis of the healthy group, all tests have good calibration validity (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). SC and TMT-A showed moderate correlation (r- value ranged from 0.572 to 0.651, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), DS showed a weak correlation(<em>r</em> = 0.373, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), CPT showed a weak correlation (r- value ranged from 0.219 to 0.444, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), the comprehensive scores of the two sets of cognitive tools showed a strong correlation (<em>r</em> = 0.739, p &lt; 0.01). In the equivalence analysis of the patient group, TMT-A and SC showed strong correlation (r- value ranged from 0.754 to 0.803, p &lt; 0.01), DS showed a weak correlation (<em>r</em> = 0.381, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), the cognitive tools comprehensive score was significantly strong correlation (<em>r</em> = 0.755, p &lt; 0.01), there was no correlation between CPT(<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). In the healthy group, there was a correlation between the scores of each subtest of the electronic version of C-BCT and the comprehensive scores of the two cognition tools, (r- value ranged from 0.261 to 0.824, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). In the patient group, there was a correlation between the scores of each subtest and the comprehensive scores of the two tools,(r- value ranged from 0.266 to 0.778, p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The electronic version of C-BCT has been compiled. The electronic version of the C-BCT performs well in overall calibration validity and could be used to assess the cognitive function of schizophrenia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144921844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anomalous self-experience in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Phenomenological and psychopathological correlates 精神分裂症谱系障碍的异常自我体验:现象学和精神病理学相关性
IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100389
Alessio Mosca , Stefania Chiappini , Arianna Pasino , Andrea Miuli , Carlotta Marrangone , Mauro Pettorruso , Giovanni Martinotti

Background

Anomalous self-experiences (ASEs) are increasingly recognized as core features of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, reflecting disruptions of the pre-reflective self or ipseity. While ASEs have been conceptualized as foundational to psychotic vulnerability, their empirical associations with broader clinical and psychological dimensions remain underexplored.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ASEs, schizotypal traits, general psychopathology, personality dimensions, and intolerance of uncertainty in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.

Methods

A cross-sectional sample of clinically stable patients (n = 30) with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders was assessed using the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ), Big Five Questionnaire (BFQ), and the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Pearson correlations and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine associations and predictive factors of self-disturbance severity.

Results

EASE scores were significantly correlated with SPQ total and cognitive-perceptual dimensions, general psychopathology (PANSS), and intolerance of uncertainty. Regression analysis identified SPQ total positive percentage, PANSS general psychopathology scores, and prospective intolerance of uncertainty as significantly associated with ASEs, explaining 42 % of the total variance. BFQ personality traits showed no significant predictive value.

Conclusion

These findings support the conceptualization of ASEs as a core, trait-like feature of schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology. The study highlights the interconnection between self-disturbance and schizotypy, affective dysregulation, and experiential disorganization. Incorporating phenomenological assessment into routine clinical practice may enhance early detection and inform targeted therapeutic approaches.
异常自我体验(ASEs)越来越被认为是精神分裂症谱系障碍的核心特征,反映了前反思自我或迟钝的破坏。虽然asa已经被定义为精神病易感性的基础,但它们与更广泛的临床和心理维度的经验关联仍未得到充分探讨。目的探讨精神分裂症谱系障碍与分裂型特征、一般精神病理、人格维度和不确定性耐受之间的关系。方法采用异常自我体验(EASE)、正阴性综合征量表(PANSS)、分裂型人格问卷(SPQ)、大五人格问卷(BFQ)和不确定性耐受度量表对30例临床稳定型精神分裂症谱系障碍患者进行横断面评估。采用Pearson相关和多元线性回归分析来检验自我困扰严重程度的相关性和预测因素。结果ase得分与SPQ总分、认知知觉维度、一般精神病理(PANSS)、不确定性耐受度显著相关。回归分析发现SPQ总阳性百分比、PANSS一般精神病理评分和对不确定性的预期不耐受与asa显著相关,解释了总方差的42%。BFQ人格特征无显著预测价值。结论:这些发现支持了as作为精神分裂症谱系精神病理的核心特征的概念。该研究强调了自我困扰与精神分裂、情感失调和经验紊乱之间的联系。将现象学评估纳入常规临床实践可以提高早期发现和有针对性的治疗方法。
{"title":"Anomalous self-experience in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Phenomenological and psychopathological correlates","authors":"Alessio Mosca ,&nbsp;Stefania Chiappini ,&nbsp;Arianna Pasino ,&nbsp;Andrea Miuli ,&nbsp;Carlotta Marrangone ,&nbsp;Mauro Pettorruso ,&nbsp;Giovanni Martinotti","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100389","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100389","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anomalous self-experiences (ASEs) are increasingly recognized as core features of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, reflecting disruptions of the pre-reflective self or <em>ipseity</em>. While ASEs have been conceptualized as foundational to psychotic vulnerability, their empirical associations with broader clinical and psychological dimensions remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ASEs, schizotypal traits, general psychopathology, personality dimensions, and intolerance of uncertainty in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional sample of clinically stable patients (<em>n</em> = 30) with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders was assessed using the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ), Big Five Questionnaire (BFQ), and the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Pearson correlations and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine associations and predictive factors of self-disturbance severity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>EASE scores were significantly correlated with SPQ total and cognitive-perceptual dimensions, general psychopathology (PANSS), and intolerance of uncertainty. Regression analysis identified SPQ total positive percentage, PANSS general psychopathology scores, and prospective intolerance of uncertainty as significantly associated with ASEs, explaining 42 % of the total variance. BFQ personality traits showed no significant predictive value.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings support the conceptualization of ASEs as a core, trait-like feature of schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology. The study highlights the interconnection between self-disturbance and schizotypy, affective dysregulation, and experiential disorganization. Incorporating phenomenological assessment into routine clinical practice may enhance early detection and inform targeted therapeutic approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144917129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognition before and after psychosis onset: A naturalistic study of change, heterogeneity, and prognosis 精神病发作前后的认知:变化、异质性和预后的自然研究
IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100387
Maria Lee , Alexis E. Cullen , Granville J. Matheson , Zheng-An Lu , Sarah E. Bergen , Carl M. Sellgren , Sophie Erhardt , Helena Fatouros-Bergman , Simon Cervenka

Aims

Cognitive dysfunction is a core feature of psychotic disorders. The degree of impairment varies greatly between individuals, which may reflect different levels of decline from pre-morbid functioning. Diverse trajectories of cognitive change prior to or during development of psychosis have been hypothesized to reflect distinct underlying pathological processes. Our primary aim was to model cognitive change over time in a sample of individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and controls. The secondary aim was to explore associations between cognitive change, clinical outcomes and select biological markers.

Methods

Our sample consisted of 72 individuals with FEP and 53 controls. School grades from nationwide population registers were used as a proxy for pre-morbid cognitive ability. All participants underwent formal cognitive testing at psychosis onset, with a subset returning for testing at 1,5 year follow up. Cognitive change was modelled using linear mixed-effects models, and resulting change scores were correlated to polygenic risk scores, cerebrospinal fluid levels of complement protein C4A and clinical outcomes.

Results

Groups did not differ in school performance prior to psychosis. Psychosis onset was associated with marked cognitive decline in FEP individuals, who subsequently performed significantly worse than controls. However, cognitive change over time varied widely between FEP individuals. Degree of cognitive change was not associated with the selected biological variables but did predict worse clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Individual cognitive trajectories may be a clinically relevant topic for further study, and larger studies are needed to further explore their potential role in stratified models of care.
目的认知功能障碍是精神障碍的核心特征。个体之间的损伤程度差异很大,这可能反映了发病前功能下降的不同程度。在精神病发展之前或发展过程中,认知变化的不同轨迹已经被假设为反映不同的潜在病理过程。我们的主要目的是在首发精神病(FEP)和对照组的个体样本中模拟认知变化随时间的变化。第二个目的是探索认知变化、临床结果和选择的生物学标志物之间的联系。方法样本包括72例FEP患者和53例对照组。来自全国人口登记的学校成绩被用作病前认知能力的代表。所有参与者在精神病发作时都接受了正式的认知测试,其中一部分在随访1年半后再次接受测试。使用线性混合效应模型对认知变化进行建模,结果变化评分与多基因风险评分、脑脊液补体蛋白C4A水平和临床结果相关。结果各组在精神病前的学业表现无显著差异。精神疾病的发作与FEP个体明显的认知能力下降有关,他们随后的表现明显比对照组差。然而,随着时间的推移,FEP个体之间的认知变化差异很大。认知改变的程度与选定的生物学变量无关,但确实预示着较差的临床结果。结论个体认知轨迹可能是一个值得进一步研究的临床相关课题,需要更大规模的研究来进一步探索其在分层护理模式中的潜在作用。
{"title":"Cognition before and after psychosis onset: A naturalistic study of change, heterogeneity, and prognosis","authors":"Maria Lee ,&nbsp;Alexis E. Cullen ,&nbsp;Granville J. Matheson ,&nbsp;Zheng-An Lu ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Bergen ,&nbsp;Carl M. Sellgren ,&nbsp;Sophie Erhardt ,&nbsp;Helena Fatouros-Bergman ,&nbsp;Simon Cervenka","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100387","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100387","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Cognitive dysfunction is a core feature of psychotic disorders. The degree of impairment varies greatly between individuals, which may reflect different levels of decline from pre-morbid functioning. Diverse trajectories of cognitive change prior to or during development of psychosis have been hypothesized to reflect distinct underlying pathological processes. Our primary aim was to model cognitive change over time in a sample of individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and controls. The secondary aim was to explore associations between cognitive change, clinical outcomes and select biological markers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our sample consisted of 72 individuals with FEP and 53 controls. School grades from nationwide population registers were used as a proxy for pre-morbid cognitive ability. All participants underwent formal cognitive testing at psychosis onset, with a subset returning for testing at 1,5 year follow up. Cognitive change was modelled using linear mixed-effects models, and resulting change scores were correlated to polygenic risk scores, cerebrospinal fluid levels of complement protein C4A and clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Groups did not differ in school performance prior to psychosis. Psychosis onset was associated with marked cognitive decline in FEP individuals, who subsequently performed significantly worse than controls. However, cognitive change over time varied widely between FEP individuals. Degree of cognitive change was not associated with the selected biological variables but did predict worse clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individual cognitive trajectories may be a clinically relevant topic for further study, and larger studies are needed to further explore their potential role in stratified models of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144911547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Symptom severity and cognitive performance in patients with substance induced psychotic disorder and schizophrenia: a cross-sectional comparative study 物质性精神障碍和精神分裂症患者的症状严重程度和认知表现:一项横断面比较研究
IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100388
Kaloyan Stoychev , Ivanka Veleva , Eleonora Mineva-Dimitrova , Petranka Chumpalova , Emiliya Dimitrova

Background and hypothesis

psychotic disorders induced by substances like marijuana, amphetamines and methamphetamines (SIPDs) are a growing mental health problem, yet the question do they represent a separate psychotic class independent from schizophrenia (SZ) still stands. Studies comparing clinical and cognitive performance of SIPD and SZ patients have produced inconsistent results.

Study design

we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 62 subjects divided into two statistically matched groups (n = 31 each) with SZ and SIPD respectively. We compared the clinical severity of their symptoms as measured by the positive and negative PANSS scores. We then applied the following neurocognitive battery – 10 Words Memory Test of Luria for verbal learning and verbal memory; Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Benton Visual Retention Test for processing speed and visual memory; Trail Making Test Part A & B for attention and cognitive flexibility (along with DSST); Logical Memory Test (LMT) for episodic memory and thinking disorders; Verbal Fluency Test (VFT) for semantic memory and language. We referenced the performance results of the two groups to the normative values of each of the tests.

Study results

SZ subjects had significantly higher positive and negative PANSS scores and greater impairment in all cognitive domains except semantic memory and language (VFT). Compared to the normative values of all tests both SZ and SIPD patients performed poorer.

Conclusions

Our data support the assumption that the two conditions share a common underlying neurobiological vulnerability that is more pronounced quantitatively in schizophrenia.
由大麻、安非他明和甲基苯丙胺(SIPDs)等物质引起的精神障碍是一个日益严重的精神健康问题,但它们是否代表一种独立于精神分裂症(SZ)的精神病类别的问题仍然存在。比较SIPD和SZ患者的临床和认知表现的研究得出了不一致的结果。研究设计:对62例SZ和SIPD患者进行横断面分析,分为两组,每组31例。我们通过PANSS阳性和阴性评分来比较他们症状的临床严重程度。然后,我们应用了以下神经认知电池- Luria 10字记忆测试用于言语学习和言语记忆;数字符号替代测验和Benton视觉保留测验对加工速度和视觉记忆的影响;Trail Making Test A & & B部分的注意力和认知灵活性测试(连同DSST);情景记忆和思维障碍的逻辑记忆测试(LMT)语言流畅性测试(VFT)用于语义记忆和语言。我们将两组的性能结果引用到每个测试的规范值。结果ssz组受试者PANSS阳性和阴性得分均显著高于对照组,除语义记忆和语言(VFT)外,其他各认知领域的功能障碍均显著高于对照组。与所有测试的正常值相比,SZ和SIPD患者的表现较差。我们的数据支持这样的假设,即这两种疾病具有共同的潜在神经生物学脆弱性,这种脆弱性在精神分裂症中更为明显。
{"title":"Symptom severity and cognitive performance in patients with substance induced psychotic disorder and schizophrenia: a cross-sectional comparative study","authors":"Kaloyan Stoychev ,&nbsp;Ivanka Veleva ,&nbsp;Eleonora Mineva-Dimitrova ,&nbsp;Petranka Chumpalova ,&nbsp;Emiliya Dimitrova","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100388","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100388","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and hypothesis</h3><div>psychotic disorders induced by substances like marijuana, amphetamines and methamphetamines (SIPDs) are a growing mental health problem, yet the question do they represent a separate psychotic class independent from schizophrenia (SZ) still stands. Studies comparing clinical and cognitive performance of SIPD and SZ patients have produced inconsistent results.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 62 subjects divided into two statistically matched groups (<em>n</em> = 31 each) with SZ and SIPD respectively. We compared the clinical severity of their symptoms as measured by the positive and negative PANSS scores. We then applied the following neurocognitive battery – 10 Words Memory Test of Luria for verbal learning and verbal memory; Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Benton Visual Retention Test for processing speed and visual memory; Trail Making Test Part A &amp; B for attention and cognitive flexibility (along with DSST); Logical Memory Test (LMT) for episodic memory and thinking disorders; Verbal Fluency Test (VFT) for semantic memory and language. We referenced the performance results of the two groups to the normative values of each of the tests.</div></div><div><h3>Study results</h3><div>SZ subjects had significantly higher positive and negative PANSS scores and greater impairment in all cognitive domains except semantic memory and language (VFT). Compared to the normative values of all tests both SZ and SIPD patients performed poorer.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our data support the assumption that the two conditions share a common underlying neurobiological vulnerability that is more pronounced quantitatively in schizophrenia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100388"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144880346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the relationships between Early Childhood Adversity, Social Cognition, and Aggression in a South African Study of People Living with Schizophrenia 南非精神分裂症患者早期童年逆境、社会认知和攻击之间的关系研究
IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100382
K. van der Walt , O. Wootton , J. Rokicki , A. Vaskinn , D. Jonker , M. Campbell , E. Susser , U.K. Haukvik , R.C. Gur , D.J. Stein , C. Friestad
People living with schizophrenia (PLS) are at increased risk of being both victims and perpetrators of violence. Recent research suggests that social cognitive impairments may contribute to heightened aggression in schizophrenia. Childhood trauma, a well-established risk factor for both schizophrenia and aggression, is also linked to more severe cognitive deficits in PLS. Few studies have explored the relationships between childhood trauma, social cognition, and aggression in large sample sizes, particularly in low- and middle-income settings, where varying socioeconomic factors and exposure to violence may influence these associations. In this study, a subsample of participants (PLS = 585; controls = 882) from the Genomics of Schizophrenia in the South African Xhosa People study completed The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), Penn Emotion Identification Test (ER), Life History of Aggression Questionnaire (LHA), and Structured Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Group differences in CTQ, ER, LHA, and selected demographic and clinical factors were assessed using t-tests and chi-square tests. Multivariable linear regressions were employed to test for associations among CTQ, ER, and LHA. We found that PLS had significantly higher childhood trauma and lifetime aggression scores and poorer emotion recognition performance than controls. Higher childhood trauma was associated with higher lifetime aggression and worse emotion recognition performance. However, emotion recognition performance was not associated with lifetime aggression. In this setting, childhood trauma predicts lifetime aggression and poorer emotion recognition, but there is no evidence that emotion recognition ability is related to aggression.
精神分裂症患者成为暴力受害者和施暴者的风险增加。最近的研究表明,社会认知障碍可能会导致精神分裂症患者的攻击性增强。童年创伤是精神分裂症和攻击的一个公认的危险因素,也与PLS中更严重的认知缺陷有关。很少有研究在大样本中探索童年创伤、社会认知和攻击之间的关系,特别是在低收入和中等收入环境中,不同的社会经济因素和暴力暴露可能影响这些关联。在本研究中,来自南非科萨人精神分裂症基因组学研究的子样本(PLS = 585,对照组= 882)完成了童年创伤问卷(CTQ)、Penn情绪识别测试(ER)、攻击生活史问卷(LHA)和DSM-IV轴I障碍的结构化诊断访谈。CTQ、ER、LHA以及选定的人口学和临床因素的组间差异采用t检验和卡方检验进行评估。采用多变量线性回归检验CTQ、ER和LHA之间的相关性。我们发现PLS的儿童创伤和终身攻击得分显著高于对照组,情绪识别表现较差。较高的童年创伤与较高的终身攻击性和较差的情绪识别表现相关。然而,情绪识别表现与终身攻击无关。在这种情况下,童年创伤预示着终身攻击和较差的情绪识别,但没有证据表明情绪识别能力与攻击有关。
{"title":"Exploring the relationships between Early Childhood Adversity, Social Cognition, and Aggression in a South African Study of People Living with Schizophrenia","authors":"K. van der Walt ,&nbsp;O. Wootton ,&nbsp;J. Rokicki ,&nbsp;A. Vaskinn ,&nbsp;D. Jonker ,&nbsp;M. Campbell ,&nbsp;E. Susser ,&nbsp;U.K. Haukvik ,&nbsp;R.C. Gur ,&nbsp;D.J. Stein ,&nbsp;C. Friestad","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100382","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100382","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People living with schizophrenia (PLS) are at increased risk of being both victims and perpetrators of violence. Recent research suggests that social cognitive impairments may contribute to heightened aggression in schizophrenia. Childhood trauma, a well-established risk factor for both schizophrenia and aggression, is also linked to more severe cognitive deficits in PLS. Few studies have explored the relationships between childhood trauma, social cognition, and aggression in large sample sizes, particularly in low- and middle-income settings, where varying socioeconomic factors and exposure to violence may influence these associations. In this study, a subsample of participants (PLS = 585; controls = 882) from the <em>Genomics of Schizophrenia in the South African Xhosa People</em> study completed The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), Penn Emotion Identification Test (ER), Life History of Aggression Questionnaire (LHA), and Structured Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Group differences in CTQ, ER, LHA, and selected demographic and clinical factors were assessed using <em>t</em>-tests and chi-square tests. Multivariable linear regressions were employed to test for associations among CTQ, ER, and LHA. We found that PLS had significantly higher childhood trauma and lifetime aggression scores and poorer emotion recognition performance than controls. Higher childhood trauma was associated with higher lifetime aggression and worse emotion recognition performance. However, emotion recognition performance was not associated with lifetime aggression. In this setting, childhood trauma predicts lifetime aggression and poorer emotion recognition, but there is no evidence that emotion recognition ability is related to aggression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144865687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring theory of mind abilities in Lebanese chronic patients with schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study 探索黎巴嫩慢性精神分裂症患者的心理能力理论:一项横断面研究
IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100385
Marie Ghosn , Chadia Haddad , Jean-Marc Rabil , Georges Haddad

Introduction

In recent decades, social cognition has become a central focus in schizophrenia research. Multiple previous studies reported impairments in multiple social cognitive domains. One particular domain of social cognition affected in schizophrenia is “Theory of Mind (TOM). The objective of this study was to examine the heterogeneity of ToM impairments within the schizophrenia population and compare TOM performance between individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and a matched healthy control group.

Methods

a cross-sectional study was conducted between June 2024 and September 2024 at the Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross (HPC) in Lebanon that explored TOM abilities in 146, chronic Lebanese schizophrenia inpatients and 50 healthy controls, using the Arabic translation of the “TOM-15,” a False Belief Task.

Results

A significant difference between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls was found, with the patient group scoring poorer on both first-order, and second-order false belief and in the comprehension control task of the TOM-15. Furthermore, among the patient population, impairments in second-order false belief were more pronounced than first-order. Performance on the BACS scale for neuro-cognition showed moderate associations with performance on the TOM-15. Multivariable analysis revealed a negative association between depression and second-order tasks as well as females outperforming males in TOM-15, especially in the second-order task.

Conclusion

The results revealed significant TOM impairments in patients with schizophrenia as compared to healthy controls, with greater difficulties observed in second-order false belief tasks.
近几十年来,社会认知已成为精神分裂症研究的中心焦点。先前的多项研究报告了多个社会认知领域的损伤。精神分裂症影响社会认知的一个特殊领域是“心理理论”(TOM)。本研究的目的是检查精神分裂症人群中ToM障碍的异质性,并比较精神分裂症患者和匹配的健康对照组之间的ToM表现。方法采用阿拉伯语翻译的“TOM-15”错误信念任务,于2024年6月至2024年9月在黎巴嫩十字精神病院(HPC)进行了一项横断面研究,探讨了146名黎巴嫩慢性精神分裂症住院患者和50名健康对照者的TOM能力。结果精神分裂症患者与健康对照组之间存在显著差异,精神分裂症患者组在一阶、二阶错误信念和TOM-15理解控制任务上得分均较低。此外,在患者群体中,二阶错误信念的损害比一阶错误信念的损害更明显。BACS神经认知量表的表现与TOM-15的表现有中等程度的关联。多变量分析显示,抑郁与二级任务之间存在负相关关系,女性在TOM-15中的表现优于男性,尤其是在二级任务中。结论与健康对照组相比,精神分裂症患者存在显著的TOM障碍,在二级错误信念任务中表现出更大的困难。
{"title":"Exploring theory of mind abilities in Lebanese chronic patients with schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Marie Ghosn ,&nbsp;Chadia Haddad ,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Rabil ,&nbsp;Georges Haddad","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100385","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100385","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In recent decades, social cognition has become a central focus in schizophrenia research. Multiple previous studies reported impairments in multiple social cognitive domains. One particular domain of social cognition affected in schizophrenia is “Theory of Mind (TOM). The objective of this study was to examine the heterogeneity of ToM impairments within the schizophrenia population and compare TOM performance between individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and a matched healthy control group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>a cross-sectional study was conducted between June 2024 and September 2024 at the Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross (HPC) in Lebanon that explored TOM abilities in 146, chronic Lebanese schizophrenia inpatients and 50 healthy controls, using the Arabic translation of the “TOM-15,” a False Belief Task.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A significant difference between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls was found, with the patient group scoring poorer on both first-order, and second-order false belief and in the comprehension control task of the TOM-15. Furthermore, among the patient population, impairments in second-order false belief were more pronounced than first-order. Performance on the BACS scale for neuro-cognition showed moderate associations with performance on the TOM-15. Multivariable analysis revealed a negative association between depression and second-order tasks as well as females outperforming males in TOM-15, especially in the second-order task.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results revealed significant TOM impairments in patients with schizophrenia as compared to healthy controls, with greater difficulties observed in second-order false belief tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100385"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144779571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Wide Range Achievement Test word reading subtest score as an indicator of premorbid intellectual disability in serious mental illness 大范围成就测验单词阅读子测验分数对严重精神疾病患者病前智力残疾的影响
IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100381
Susan R. McGurk , Renata Botello , Daniel Fulford , Kim T. Mueser

Objective

Performance on reading tests is often used as an indicator of premorbid intellectual disability in individuals with serious mental illness (SMI), but independent evidence validating their use is lacking. This study evaluated the accuracy of the Wide Range Achievement Test Word Reading Subtest in predicting history of intellectual disability in people with SMI.

Methods

Participants were 105 people with SMI (62.8 % schizophrenia) with either a confirmed history of intellectual disability based on medical record review (Confirmed ID; n = 18) or no such history (No ID; n = 87). Participants were administered the WRAT-III Reading Subtest, the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery, and three other cognitive tests. A receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve was fit to identify the optimal cutoff score on the WRAT for correctly classifying the Confirmed ID and No ID groups. t-tests and effect sizes were used to compare the two groups on the WRAT and cognitive tests.

Results

The ROC curve indicated that a cutoff score of 70 or below on the WRAT correctly identified 88.9 % of individuals with Confirmed ID (sensitivity) and incorrectly identified 5.6 % of individuals with No ID (Specificity) (p < .001). Performance on the cognitive battery was worse in the Confirmed ID group than No ID group, but the effect size for the WRAT was higher than any of the cognitive tests.

Conclusions

A WRAT Word Reading Subtest score of ≤70 is a strong indicator of premorbid intellectual disability in people with SMI.
阅读测试的表现通常被用作严重精神疾病(SMI)患者发病前智力残疾的指标,但缺乏独立的证据来验证其使用。本研究评估了宽范围成就测试单词阅读子测试预测重度精神障碍患者智力残疾史的准确性。方法研究对象为105名重度精神障碍患者(占精神分裂症患者的62.8%),根据医疗记录审查,这些患者要么有确诊的智力残疾史(确诊ID;n = 18)或无此类历史记录(no ID;n = 87)。参与者接受WRAT-III阅读子测试,改善精神分裂症认知的测量和治疗研究(matrix)共识认知电池,以及其他三个认知测试。拟合接收者操作者特征(ROC)曲线,以确定WRAT上正确分类已确认ID和未确认ID组的最佳截止分数。使用t检验和效应量来比较两组在WRAT和认知测试上的差异。结果ROC曲线显示,WRAT的截止分为70分或以下时,正确识别出88.9%的确诊ID(敏感性),错误识别出5.6%的未确诊ID(特异性)(p <;措施)。确认身份组在认知电池方面的表现比没有身份组差,但WRAT的效应值高于任何认知测试。结论WRAT单词阅读亚测试分数≤70分是重度精神障碍患者发病前智力残疾的重要指标。
{"title":"Wide Range Achievement Test word reading subtest score as an indicator of premorbid intellectual disability in serious mental illness","authors":"Susan R. McGurk ,&nbsp;Renata Botello ,&nbsp;Daniel Fulford ,&nbsp;Kim T. Mueser","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100381","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100381","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Performance on reading tests is often used as an indicator of premorbid intellectual disability in individuals with serious mental illness (SMI), but independent evidence validating their use is lacking. This study evaluated the accuracy of the Wide Range Achievement Test Word Reading Subtest in predicting history of intellectual disability in people with SMI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were 105 people with SMI (62.8 % schizophrenia) with either a confirmed history of intellectual disability based on medical record review (Confirmed ID; <em>n</em> = 18) or no such history (No ID; <em>n</em> = 87). Participants were administered the WRAT-III Reading Subtest, the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery, and three other cognitive tests. A receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve was fit to identify the optimal cutoff score on the WRAT for correctly classifying the Confirmed ID and No ID groups. <em>t</em>-tests and effect sizes were used to compare the two groups on the WRAT and cognitive tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ROC curve indicated that a cutoff score of 70 or below on the WRAT correctly identified 88.9 % of individuals with Confirmed ID (sensitivity) and incorrectly identified 5.6 % of individuals with No ID (Specificity) (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). Performance on the cognitive battery was worse in the Confirmed ID group than No ID group, but the effect size for the WRAT was higher than any of the cognitive tests.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A WRAT Word Reading Subtest score of ≤70 is a strong indicator of premorbid intellectual disability in people with SMI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144772524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and administration of the flexible adapted cognitive test battery for schizophrenia (FACTS) 精神分裂症灵活适应性认知测试(FACTS)的开发与应用
IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100377
Bing Cai , William S. Stone , Xinyi Ouyang , Fei Deng , Hanhui Chen , Min Qian , Margaux M. Grivel , Matcheri S. Keshavan , Ezra S. Susser , Lawrence H. Yang , Michael R. Phillips

Background

Age and educational eligibility criteria for administration of the most widely used cognitive battery for schizophrenia typically exclude 20 % of individuals with schizophrenia in high-income countries and 25–50 % in middle- and low-income countries.

Methods

We developed the Flexible Adapted Cognitive Test battery for Schizophrenia (FACTS) that can be administered to all individuals with schizophrenia, regardless of age or education. To evaluate the utility and validity of the nine tests in the FACTS, two process measures are assessed during the administration of each test: ‘test comprehension’ and ‘test completion’ (successful or unsuccessful). The FACTS was administered to 495 community-dwelling individuals with schizophrenia and 308 healthy controls, including 473 (58.9 %) older or undereducated individuals typically excluded from studies of cognition in schizophrenia. Inter-rater reliability of the test comprehension and completion measures was assessed.

Findings

Older, undereducated participants successfully completed 82 % (3499/4257) of the administered tests. The mean weighted Kappa value for the nine test comprehension measures was 0.90 (range: 0.82–0.96), and the mean unweighted Kappa for the 20 test and subtest completion measures was 0.94 (range: 0.85–1.00).

Interpretation

Cognitive functioning is a core symptom cluster of schizophrenia, so the comprehensive assessment of cognitive functioning must become a standard part of the assessment of all individuals with schizophrenia, regardless of age or education. The development of the FACTS, which can be successfully administered to most older, undereducated individuals with schizophrenia, provides a model for doing this.

Funding

This study was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grants MH108385-R01 and MH127631-R01.
使用最广泛使用的精神分裂症认知疗法的年龄和教育资格标准通常将高收入国家20%的精神分裂症患者和中低收入国家25 - 50%的精神分裂症患者排除在外。方法:我们开发了精神分裂症灵活适应性认知测试(FACTS),可用于所有精神分裂症患者,无论其年龄或教育程度。为了评估FACTS中九个测试的效用和有效性,在每个测试的管理过程中评估了两个过程度量:“测试理解”和“测试完成”(成功或不成功)。研究人员对495名社区精神分裂症患者和308名健康对照者进行了FACTS调查,其中包括473名(58.9%)老年人或受教育程度较低的人,这些人通常被排除在精神分裂症认知研究之外。评估了测试理解和完成措施的量表间信度。结果发现,受教育程度低的参与者成功完成了82%(3499/4257)的管理测试。9个测试理解测度的平均加权Kappa值为0.90(范围:0.82-0.96),20个测试和子测试完成测度的平均未加权Kappa值为0.94(范围:0.85-1.00)。认知功能是精神分裂症的核心症状群,因此认知功能的综合评估必须成为所有精神分裂症患者评估的标准部分,无论年龄或教育程度。事实证明的制定为这样做提供了一种模式。事实证明可以成功地应用于大多数受教育程度较低的老年精神分裂症患者。本研究由国家精神卫生研究所资助MH108385-R01和MH127631-R01。
{"title":"Development and administration of the flexible adapted cognitive test battery for schizophrenia (FACTS)","authors":"Bing Cai ,&nbsp;William S. Stone ,&nbsp;Xinyi Ouyang ,&nbsp;Fei Deng ,&nbsp;Hanhui Chen ,&nbsp;Min Qian ,&nbsp;Margaux M. Grivel ,&nbsp;Matcheri S. Keshavan ,&nbsp;Ezra S. Susser ,&nbsp;Lawrence H. Yang ,&nbsp;Michael R. Phillips","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100377","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100377","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Age and educational eligibility criteria for administration of the most widely used cognitive battery for schizophrenia typically exclude 20 % of individuals with schizophrenia in high-income countries and 25–50 % in middle- and low-income countries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed the Flexible Adapted Cognitive Test battery for Schizophrenia (FACTS) that can be administered to <em>all</em> individuals with schizophrenia, regardless of age or education. To evaluate the utility and validity of the nine tests in the FACTS, two process measures are assessed during the administration of each test: ‘test comprehension’ and ‘test completion’ (successful or unsuccessful). The FACTS was administered to 495 community-dwelling individuals with schizophrenia and 308 healthy controls, including 473 (58.9 %) older or undereducated individuals typically excluded from studies of cognition in schizophrenia. Inter-rater reliability of the test comprehension and completion measures was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Older, undereducated participants successfully completed 82 % (3499/4257) of the administered tests. The mean weighted Kappa value for the nine test comprehension measures was 0.90 (range: 0.82–0.96), and the mean unweighted Kappa for the 20 test and subtest completion measures was 0.94 (range: 0.85–1.00).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Cognitive functioning is a core symptom cluster of schizophrenia, so the comprehensive assessment of cognitive functioning must become a standard part of the assessment of <em>all</em> individuals with schizophrenia, regardless of age or education. The development of the FACTS, which can be successfully administered to most older, undereducated individuals with schizophrenia, provides a model for doing this.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This study was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grants MH108385-R01 and MH127631-R01.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144772525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The aperiodic and periodic activities of EEG dynamically relate with cognitive performance in schizophrenia 脑电的非周期性和周期性活动与精神分裂症患者的认知表现动态相关
IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100383
Kexin Zhang , Yunfei Ji , Xiaodong Guo , Tianqi Gao , Xuemin Zhang , Xin Yu , Jing Wang

Background

Aperiodic and periodic activities of electrophysiological signals have strong correlation with various neurocognitive factors. In the current study, we aim to investigate the aperiodic exponent and periodic oscillations (alpha and beta band power) and their associations with cognitive performance in schizophrenia (SCZ).

Methods

We enrolled 32 SCZ patients and 33 healthy controls (HC) for the study. Cognitive performance was assessed using the total Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). Before and after the language comprehension tasks (humor, metaphor and irony), the 5-min eyes-closed and eyes-open EEG signals were collected respectively. The aperiodic exponent and periodic power were extracted and obtained according to the division of brain regions. Finally, Pearson correlation was used to examine the relationships between the EEG parameters and behavioral measures.

Results

SCZ participants exhibited higher aperiodic exponents and lower periodic oscillations compared to HC. The aperiodic exponent decreased significantly after the tasks in central location (F (56,1) = 8.93, P = 0.004, η2 = 0.14) in both groups, while the periodic oscillations had no significant change. The variance of the aperiodic exponent showed significantly negative correlation with Z scores of humor comprehension tasks (r = −0.42, P = 0.027) in SCZ. Besides, the pre-tasks aperiodic exponent in posterior location positively correlated with T scores of attention and speed of information processing (r = 0.35, P = 0.048).

Conclusions

Our findings confirmed the higher aperiodic exponent with lower alpha and beta band in SCZ, along with the variability and task-responsiveness of the aperiodic exponent. The findings suggest that aperiodic exponent holds strong cognitive functional implications in SCZ.
电生理信号的非周期性和周期性活动与各种神经认知因素有很强的相关性。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨非周期指数和周期振荡(α和β波段功率)及其与精神分裂症(SCZ)认知表现的关系。方法选择32例SCZ患者和33例健康对照进行研究。认知表现采用精神分裂症患者认知简要评估(BACS)总分进行评估。在语言理解任务(幽默、隐喻和反讽)前后,分别采集闭眼和睁眼5分钟的脑电图信号。根据脑区的划分,提取并得到了非周期指数和周期幂。最后,采用Pearson相关检验脑电参数与行为测量之间的关系。结果与HC相比,scz参与者表现出更高的非周期指数和更低的周期振荡。中心位置任务完成后,两组的非周期指数均显著下降(F (56,1) = 8.93, P = 0.004, η2 = 0.14),而周期振荡无显著变化。SCZ的非周期指数方差与幽默理解任务Z得分呈显著负相关(r = - 0.42, P = 0.027)。任务前的后验定位非周期指数与注意力和信息加工速度T得分呈正相关(r = 0.35, P = 0.048)。结论SCZ具有较高的非周期指数和较低的α和β带,以及非周期指数的变异性和任务反应性。研究结果表明,非周期指数在SCZ中具有很强的认知功能意义。
{"title":"The aperiodic and periodic activities of EEG dynamically relate with cognitive performance in schizophrenia","authors":"Kexin Zhang ,&nbsp;Yunfei Ji ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Guo ,&nbsp;Tianqi Gao ,&nbsp;Xuemin Zhang ,&nbsp;Xin Yu ,&nbsp;Jing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100383","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100383","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Aperiodic and periodic activities of electrophysiological signals have strong correlation with various neurocognitive factors. In the current study, we aim to investigate the aperiodic exponent and periodic oscillations (alpha and beta band power) and their associations with cognitive performance in schizophrenia (SCZ).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 32 SCZ patients and 33 healthy controls (HC) for the study. Cognitive performance was assessed using the total Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). Before and after the language comprehension tasks (humor, metaphor and irony), the 5-min eyes-closed and eyes-open EEG signals were collected respectively. The aperiodic exponent and periodic power were extracted and obtained according to the division of brain regions. Finally, Pearson correlation was used to examine the relationships between the EEG parameters and behavioral measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SCZ participants exhibited higher aperiodic exponents and lower periodic oscillations compared to HC. The aperiodic exponent decreased significantly after the tasks in central location (<em>F</em> (56,1) = 8.93, <em>P</em> = 0.004, <em>η</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.14) in both groups, while the periodic oscillations had no significant change. The variance of the aperiodic exponent showed significantly negative correlation with <em>Z</em> scores of humor comprehension tasks (<em>r</em> = −0.42, <em>P</em> = 0.027) in SCZ. Besides, the pre-tasks aperiodic exponent in posterior location positively correlated with <em>T</em> scores of attention and speed of information processing (<em>r</em> = 0.35, <em>P</em> = 0.048).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings confirmed the higher aperiodic exponent with lower alpha and beta band in SCZ, along with the variability and task-responsiveness of the aperiodic exponent. The findings suggest that aperiodic exponent holds strong cognitive functional implications in SCZ.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144739078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Theory-of-mind improvement in schizophrenia after integrative cognitive remediation: which patients benefit more? 精神分裂症综合认知修复后心理理论改善:哪些患者受益更多?
IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100380
Agurne Sampedro , Javier Peña , Pedro Sánchez , Naroa Ibarretxe-Bilbao , Nagore Iriarte-Yoller , Cristóbal Pavón , Natalia Ojeda
Social cognition, and specifically theory of mind, is considered a key factor in predicting functional outcomes and quality of life in schizophrenia. Although cognitive remediation is an effective intervention for improving theory of mind, little is known about the factors that moderate this improvement. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify moderators of theory-of-mind improvement in schizophrenia after integrative cognitive remediation (REHACOP). Data from two randomized controlled trials were used in this secondary analysis. The sample included 182 patients (experimental group = 94; active control group = 88) from the Mental Health Network in Álava (Spain). A comprehensive assessment of clinical symptoms, neurocognition, theory of mind, and functional outcome at baseline and follow-up was carried out. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to identify moderators of theory-of-mind improvement. Regardless of the patients' initial profiles, the REHACOP was effective in improving theory of mind (F = 27.00, p < .001). Regression analyses, however, revealed that baseline neurocognition (β = −0.223, t = −2.075, p = .039), baseline theory of mind (β = −0.325, t = −3.100, p = .002), and baseline positive symptoms (β = −0.243, t = −2.296, p = .023) played a moderating role in the improvement of theory of mind after the REHACOP. Results showed that those participants with lower baseline neurocognition and theory-of-mind scores and less positive symptoms obtained greater theory-of-mind benefits. Determining the factors that account for the different patterns of improvement after cognitive remediation could be helpful in the implementation of personalized cognitive remediation plans and for the appropriate use of healthcare resources.
社会认知,特别是心理理论,被认为是预测精神分裂症功能结局和生活质量的关键因素。虽然认知补救是改善心理理论的有效干预措施,但对调节这种改善的因素知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是确定精神分裂症综合认知补救(REHACOP)后心理理论改善的调节因子。二次分析采用了两项随机对照试验的数据。样本包括182例患者(实验组94例;积极对照组= 88),来自Álava(西班牙)心理健康网络。在基线和随访时对临床症状、神经认知、心理理论和功能结局进行综合评估。采用层次回归分析确定心理理论改善的调节因子。无论患者最初的情况如何,REHACOP在改善心理理论方面都是有效的(F = 27.00, p <;措施)。然而,回归分析显示,基线神经认知(β = - 0.223, t = - 2.075, p = 0.039)、基线心理理论(β = - 0.325, t = - 3.100, p = 0.002)和基线阳性症状(β = - 0.243, t = - 2.296, p = 0.023)对REHACOP后心理理论的改善起调节作用。结果显示,那些基线神经认知和心理理论得分较低、阳性症状较少的参与者获得了更大的心理理论益处。确定导致认知修复后不同改善模式的因素可能有助于实施个性化的认知修复计划和适当使用医疗资源。
{"title":"Theory-of-mind improvement in schizophrenia after integrative cognitive remediation: which patients benefit more?","authors":"Agurne Sampedro ,&nbsp;Javier Peña ,&nbsp;Pedro Sánchez ,&nbsp;Naroa Ibarretxe-Bilbao ,&nbsp;Nagore Iriarte-Yoller ,&nbsp;Cristóbal Pavón ,&nbsp;Natalia Ojeda","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100380","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100380","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social cognition, and specifically theory of mind, is considered a key factor in predicting functional outcomes and quality of life in schizophrenia. Although cognitive remediation is an effective intervention for improving theory of mind, little is known about the factors that moderate this improvement. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify moderators of theory-of-mind improvement in schizophrenia after integrative cognitive remediation (REHACOP). Data from two randomized controlled trials were used in this secondary analysis. The sample included 182 patients (experimental group = 94; active control group = 88) from the Mental Health Network in Álava (Spain). A comprehensive assessment of clinical symptoms, neurocognition, theory of mind, and functional outcome at baseline and follow-up was carried out. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to identify moderators of theory-of-mind improvement. Regardless of the patients' initial profiles, the REHACOP was effective in improving theory of mind (<em>F</em> = 27.00, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Regression analyses, however, revealed that baseline neurocognition (<em>β</em> = −0.223, <em>t</em> = −2.075, <em>p</em> = .039), baseline theory of mind (<em>β</em> = −0.325, <em>t</em> = −3.100, <em>p</em> = .002), and baseline positive symptoms (<em>β</em> = −0.243, <em>t</em> = −2.296, <em>p</em> = .023) played a moderating role in the improvement of theory of mind after the REHACOP. Results showed that those participants with lower baseline neurocognition and theory-of-mind scores and less positive symptoms obtained greater theory-of-mind benefits. Determining the factors that account for the different patterns of improvement after cognitive remediation could be helpful in the implementation of personalized cognitive remediation plans and for the appropriate use of healthcare resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144686410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Schizophrenia Research-Cognition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1