This article examines the gender-blind perception of the social work profession in Croatia and its relation to domestic violence cases. In the past few years, the media and the public have routinely expressed outrage at social workers for not preventing severe cases of violence against women and children. The shift from state socialism to capitalism in Croatian society has considerably affected the profession of social work and facilitated the defunding and understaffing of the welfare sector. I argue that a more nuanced, gendered approach is needed in demanding prevention work from social work centres (SWC). Most studies on the causes of burnout in social workers have ignored the feminisation of the profession and the gendered implication of their precarious professional position and responsibility to protect and help the most vulnerable members of society. The perceptions of social work by other experts working with cases of domestic violence and social workers themselves are important to comprehend a bigger picture of professional judgment and attributions of blame. In-depth interviews were conducted with experts working with domestic violence, including the police, judges, prosecutors, social workers, feminist NGO coordinators, and women’s shelter workers. The feminisation of social work and systemic undervaluing of care work contribute to the easy targeting of social workers while leaving the patriarchal institutionalisation unexplored. For this reason, I conclude that social workers would benefit from class and gender solidary with their clients to fight patriarchal biases.
{"title":"Social Work and Domestic Violence in Croatia Through a Gendered Lens","authors":"Jana Kujundžić","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.3.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.3.3","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the gender-blind perception of the social work profession in Croatia and its relation to domestic violence cases. In the past few years, the media and the public have routinely expressed outrage at social workers for not preventing severe cases of violence against women and children. The shift from state socialism to capitalism in Croatian society has considerably affected the profession of social work and facilitated the defunding and understaffing of the welfare sector. I argue that a more nuanced, gendered approach is needed in demanding prevention work from social work centres (SWC). Most studies on the causes of burnout in social workers have ignored the feminisation of the profession and the gendered implication of their precarious professional position and responsibility to protect and help the most vulnerable members of society. The perceptions of social work by other experts working with cases of domestic violence and social workers themselves are important to comprehend a bigger picture of professional judgment and attributions of blame. In-depth interviews were conducted with experts working with domestic violence, including the police, judges, prosecutors, social workers, feminist NGO coordinators, and women’s shelter workers. The feminisation of social work and systemic undervaluing of care work contribute to the easy targeting of social workers while leaving the patriarchal institutionalisation unexplored. For this reason, I conclude that social workers would benefit from class and gender solidary with their clients to fight patriarchal biases.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43381579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper aims to present the advantages of a qualitative approach in migration studies. Regardless of its proven validity, the qualitative perspective is still underutilised and remains overshadowed by research inspired by (neo)positivist, quantitative and statistical methods in migration studies. The paper seeks to prove the hypothesis that qualitative research, and the biographical method in particular, enables research on migration in its processuality, provides insight into the interconnection between the structure and the agency in all migration phases, and shines a light on power relations that produce unequal outcomes of these movements. The significance and reach of qualitative approaches have been demonstrated through the analysis of particular methodology solutions and the findings obtained by the research on the contemporary international migration of women from Serbia in the European context. The first section of the paper is a comprehensive overview of the application of theoretical and methodological approaches in migration studies, followed by an elaborate description of individual methodological procedures as well as relevant findings of the mentioned research. The main contribution of this paper is that it shows how qualitative research enables the re-examination and deconstruction of categories within which we are used to observing migrants and which actually represent a reflection of the administrative management of international movements.
{"title":"Istraživanje migracija iz kvalitativne perspektive","authors":"Dunja Poleti Ćosić","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.3.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.3.1","url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to present the advantages of a qualitative approach in migration studies. Regardless of its proven validity, the qualitative perspective is still underutilised and remains overshadowed by research inspired by (neo)positivist, quantitative and statistical methods in migration studies. The paper seeks to prove the hypothesis that qualitative research, and the biographical method in particular, enables research on migration in its processuality, provides insight into the interconnection between the structure and the agency in all migration phases, and shines a light on power relations that produce unequal outcomes of these movements. The significance and reach of qualitative approaches have been demonstrated through the analysis of particular methodology solutions and the findings obtained by the research on the contemporary international migration of women from Serbia in the European context. The first section of the paper is a comprehensive overview of the application of theoretical and methodological approaches in migration studies, followed by an elaborate description of individual methodological procedures as well as relevant findings of the mentioned research. The main contribution of this paper is that it shows how qualitative research enables the re-examination and deconstruction of categories within which we are used to observing migrants and which actually represent a reflection of the administrative management of international movements.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44657018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Traditionally, a romantic relationship starts with two people going on dates and developing emotional and then physical closeness. However, social developments and social media have begun to change that. Therefore, the main aim of our qualitative study was to outline modern dating scripts and forms of casual sexual relationships among Croatian emerging adults, and to identify the needs they fulfill. We conducted four focus groups with young people aged 18 to 25, of whom some were unemployed, some employed and some were university students. The results suggest that emerging adults in Croatia equally choose the traditional dating script and modern casual relationships, such as open relationship, friendship with benefits, fuck buddy, booty call, and one-night stand. Long-term relationships are seen as a step before marriage or cohabitation, and some young people try to avoid them until their career and other life circumstances are stable enough. In that sense, casual relationships can be satisfying, at least temporarily. However, they can also be confusing because different people seem to define them in different ways and, accordingly, have different expectations. The present study broadens our understanding of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood, and as one of the first Croatian studies on this topic, makes an important contribution to the field of personal relationships. It can serve not only as a reference for future studies but also as a base for developing prevention programmes that strengthen romantic competence and develop communication skills for emerging adults.
{"title":"Is Dating Dead? Modern Dating Among Emerging Adults in Croatia","authors":"Lucija Šutić, Margareta Jelić, Ana Krnić","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.3.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.3.4","url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, a romantic relationship starts with two people going on dates and developing emotional and then physical closeness. However, social developments and social media have begun to change that. Therefore, the main aim of our qualitative study was to outline modern dating scripts and forms of casual sexual relationships among Croatian emerging adults, and to identify the needs they fulfill. We conducted four focus groups with young people aged 18 to 25, of whom some were unemployed, some employed and some were university students. The results suggest that emerging adults in Croatia equally choose the traditional dating script and modern casual relationships, such as open relationship, friendship with benefits, fuck buddy, booty call, and one-night stand. Long-term relationships are seen as a step before marriage or cohabitation, and some young people try to avoid them until their career and other life circumstances are stable enough. In that sense, casual relationships can be satisfying, at least temporarily. However, they can also be confusing because different people seem to define them in different ways and, accordingly, have different expectations. The present study broadens our understanding of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood, and as one of the first Croatian studies on this topic, makes an important contribution to the field of personal relationships. It can serve not only as a reference for future studies but also as a base for developing prevention programmes that strengthen romantic competence and develop communication skills for emerging adults.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44711487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Civilne udruge i osobe koje rade s osobama u beskućništvu često sugeriraju da je beskućništvo kod žena manje često nego kod muškaraca, što potvrđuju i postojeće dostupne statistike. U literaturi je pokazano kako su žene osobito ranjive kad je riječ o beskućništvu, osobito u kontekstu brojnih strukturalnih i društvenih barijera koje pogađaju žene u društvu. Iskustva žena u beskućništvu razlikuju se od iskustava muškaraca te preslikavaju šire rodne nejednakosti. Život na cesti prožet je opasnostima i stalnim izazovima da se zadovolje osnovne potrebe. Korištenje javnih prostora osobito je izazovno za žene u beskućništvu, zbog njihova statusa beskućništva, ali i zbog toga što su žene. Stoga, cilj je rada analizirati žensko iskustvo uličnog beskućništva u Zagrebu, pokazati njegove specifičnosti te identificirati strategije u situacijama različitih oblika isključivanja. U tu svrhu analizirano je deset intervjua provedenih sa šest žena s iskustvom uličnog beskućništva u Zagrebu te terenske bilješke koje su dio širega kvalitativnog istraživanja. U radu se prikazuju iskustva i izazovi života na cesti, koji uključuju osjećaje nesigurnosti i straha, nezadovoljene zdravstvene potrebe, nasilje i seksualno uznemiravanje te isključivanja iz javnih prostora te strategije povezane sa skrivanjem, pronalaskom partnera/grupiranjem i distanciranjem od neželjenih identiteta. Rad ukazuje na važnost prepoznavanja ozbiljnosti i opsega problema beskućništva, osobito ženskoga, te nužnost daljnjeg istraživanja koje uključuje rodne dimenzije i specifičnosti problema.
民间组织和与无家可归者打交道的人经常表示，女性无家可归的情况比男性少，这证实了现有的统计数据。在文献中，妇女特别容易无家可归，特别是在影响妇女的许多结构性和社会障碍的背景下。女性无家可归的经历与男性不同，她们避免了更广泛的出生不平等。道路上的生活是危险的，满足基本需求的挑战不断。公共空间的使用对无家可归的妇女来说尤其具有挑战性，因为她们的无家可归状况，也因为妇女。因此，这项工作的目的是分析萨格勒布街头无家可归妇女的经历，展示其特点，并确定不同形式的排斥策略。在Zagrebu te terenske bilješke koje su dioširega kvalitivinog istraživanja的采访中，我证实了这一点。这部作品展示了道路上生活的经历和挑战，包括不安全感和恐惧、不可接受的健康需求、暴力和性骚扰、被排斥在公共空间之外以及隐藏的策略、寻找伴侣/群体和远离不想要的身份。这项工作强调了查明无家可归者，特别是妇女的严重程度和程度的重要性，以及进一步研究的必要性，包括这一问题的出生层面和特殊性。
{"title":"Iskustva i strategije žena u uličnom beskućništvu u Zagrebu","authors":"Paula Greiner","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.3.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.3.2","url":null,"abstract":"Civilne udruge i osobe koje rade s osobama u beskućništvu često sugeriraju da je beskućništvo kod žena manje često nego kod muškaraca, što potvrđuju i postojeće dostupne statistike. U literaturi je pokazano kako su žene osobito ranjive kad je riječ o beskućništvu, osobito u kontekstu brojnih strukturalnih i društvenih barijera koje pogađaju žene u društvu. Iskustva žena u beskućništvu razlikuju se od iskustava muškaraca te preslikavaju šire rodne nejednakosti. Život na cesti prožet je opasnostima i stalnim izazovima da se zadovolje osnovne potrebe. Korištenje javnih prostora osobito je izazovno za žene u beskućništvu, zbog njihova statusa beskućništva, ali i zbog toga što su žene. Stoga, cilj je rada analizirati žensko iskustvo uličnog beskućništva u Zagrebu, pokazati njegove specifičnosti te identificirati strategije u situacijama različitih oblika isključivanja. U tu svrhu analizirano je deset intervjua provedenih sa šest žena s iskustvom uličnog beskućništva u Zagrebu te terenske bilješke koje su dio širega kvalitativnog istraživanja. U radu se prikazuju iskustva i izazovi života na cesti, koji uključuju osjećaje nesigurnosti i straha, nezadovoljene zdravstvene potrebe, nasilje i seksualno uznemiravanje te isključivanja iz javnih prostora te strategije povezane sa skrivanjem, pronalaskom partnera/grupiranjem i distanciranjem od neželjenih identiteta. Rad ukazuje na važnost prepoznavanja ozbiljnosti i opsega problema beskućništva, osobito ženskoga, te nužnost daljnjeg istraživanja koje uključuje rodne dimenzije i specifičnosti problema.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43495512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Vidaković, Matilda Nikolić Ivanišević, Andrea Tokić, Jelena Ombla, Ana Slišković
Cilj istraživanja bio je ispitati stavove prema djeci s teškoćama u razvoju te razlike u pojedinim aspektima stava (socijalna distanca, osjećanje i ponašanje u blizini djeteta s teškoćama u razvoju) s obzirom na sociodemografske karakteristike sudionika, iskustvo u kontaktu s djecom s teškoćama te razinu znanja o problematici. Istraživanje je provedeno na reprezentativnom uzorku punoljetnih građana RH (N=600) metodom telefonskog anketiranja. Građani RH imaju izrazito pozitivne stavove prema djeci s teškoćama: 86% sudionika se osjeća donekle ili potpuno ugodno u njihovoj blizini, 93% ostvaruje kontakt pri konkretnom susretu, a 70% ih izjavljuje da nema nikakvu socijalnu distancu prema djeci s teškoćama. Žene se, u odnosu na muškarce, osjećaju ugodnije u njihovoj blizini. Osobe nižeg obrazovanja i starije dobi izražavaju veću socijalnu distancu, ali stariji sudionici pri kontaktu otvorenije pristupaju djeci s teškoćama. Znanje se pokazalo važnom odrednicom stava prema djeci s teškoćama u razvoju, pri čemu sudionici s najmanje znanja imaju najizraženiju socijalnu distancu, doživljavaju najveću razinu neugode pri susretu s djecom s teškoćama te rjeđe ulaze u kontakt ili ga iniciraju. Poznavanje djeteta s teškoćom pozitivno se odrazilo na afektivnu i ponašajnu komponentu stava. Nalazi ovog istraživanja upućuju na prihvaćanje djece s teškoćama u razvoju u našem društvu te ističu ulogu znanja i kontakta u borbi protiv stigmatizacije ranjivih skupina.
研究的目的是考察发展困难儿童的态度，以及考虑到参与者的社会人口学特征、与发展困难儿童接触的经验和困难知识，态度的某些方面（社交距离、与发展障碍儿童亲近的感觉和行为）的差异。本研究采用电话调查法，对具有代表性的成年人RH（N=600）进行调查。RH公民对困难儿童持极其积极的态度：86%的参与者感到不舒服或满意，93%的人参加了具体的会议，70%的人表示与困难儿童没有社交距离。女人比男人舒服。受教育程度较低、年龄较大的人表现出更大的社交距离，但老年人在与有困难的儿童进行公开接触时表现出更高的社交距离。事实证明，知识是衡量发展中对残疾儿童态度的一个重要指标，在发展中，知识最少的参与者有最明显的社交距离，在遇到有困难的儿童时经历最大程度的逆境，很少接触或主动帮助他们。了解一个有困难的孩子对该职位的有效和行为组成部分有积极影响。Nalazi ovog istraživanja upućuju na prihvaćanje djece s teškoćama u razvoju u našem društvu te ističu ulogu znanja i kontakta u borbi protiv污名化je ranjivih skupina。
{"title":"Stavovi hrvatskih građana prema djeci s teškoćama u razvoju","authors":"M. Vidaković, Matilda Nikolić Ivanišević, Andrea Tokić, Jelena Ombla, Ana Slišković","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.2.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.2.2","url":null,"abstract":"Cilj istraživanja bio je ispitati stavove prema djeci s teškoćama u razvoju te razlike u pojedinim aspektima stava (socijalna distanca, osjećanje i ponašanje u blizini djeteta s teškoćama u razvoju) s obzirom na sociodemografske karakteristike sudionika, iskustvo u kontaktu s djecom s teškoćama te razinu znanja o problematici. Istraživanje je provedeno na reprezentativnom uzorku punoljetnih građana RH (N=600) metodom telefonskog anketiranja. Građani RH imaju izrazito pozitivne stavove prema djeci s teškoćama: 86% sudionika se osjeća donekle ili potpuno ugodno u njihovoj blizini, 93% ostvaruje kontakt pri konkretnom susretu, a 70% ih izjavljuje da nema nikakvu socijalnu distancu prema djeci s teškoćama. Žene se, u odnosu na muškarce, osjećaju ugodnije u njihovoj blizini. Osobe nižeg obrazovanja i starije dobi izražavaju veću socijalnu distancu, ali stariji sudionici pri kontaktu otvorenije pristupaju djeci s teškoćama. Znanje se pokazalo važnom odrednicom stava prema djeci s teškoćama u razvoju, pri čemu sudionici s najmanje znanja imaju najizraženiju socijalnu distancu, doživljavaju najveću razinu neugode pri susretu s djecom s teškoćama te rjeđe ulaze u kontakt ili ga iniciraju. Poznavanje djeteta s teškoćom pozitivno se odrazilo na afektivnu i ponašajnu komponentu stava. Nalazi ovog istraživanja upućuju na prihvaćanje djece s teškoćama u razvoju u našem društvu te ističu ulogu znanja i kontakta u borbi protiv stigmatizacije ranjivih skupina.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43152897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alcohol consumption takes place in society and because of society. The “social” aspect of this phenomenon gives a meaning that manifests itself in the framework of interaction. This paper discusses basic problems of previous sociological approaches to alcohol consumption: (1) focus on a problem-oriented approach – drinking and alcoholism, (2) abstract empiricism of alcohol consumption, and (3) unclear theoretical background for a sociological approach to alcohol consumption. Focusing exclusively on alcoholism or excessive drinking neglects a number of social dimensions inherent in alcohol consumption. Therefore, when considering this phenomenon in sociological terms, clear theoretical-methodological starting points should be established in order to understand the social consumption of alcohol. The main objective of this paper was to provide a basic paradigmatic and epistemological framework for the development of a sociology of alcohol consumption. The paper starts from the assumption that two theoretical-methodological principles should be considered: methodological individualism and methodological situationism. Each of these approaches has certain advantages and disadvantages, but in further conceptualising the paradigmatic foundations of the sociology of alcohol consumption, the paper proposed a two-level approach, that is, a synthesis of methodological situationism and methodological individualism. However, this synthesis does not constitute a theory of the sociology of alcohol consumption, but a framework for a sociological approach to the phenomenon, as well as the possibility of overcoming the problems presented in the sociological analysis of this topic.
{"title":"Sociology of Alcohol Consumption – In Search of a Theory","authors":"E. Brezovec","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.2.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.2.3","url":null,"abstract":"Alcohol consumption takes place in society and because of society. The “social” aspect of this phenomenon gives a meaning that manifests itself in the framework of interaction. This paper discusses basic problems of previous sociological approaches to alcohol consumption: (1) focus on a problem-oriented approach – drinking and alcoholism, (2) abstract empiricism of alcohol consumption, and (3) unclear theoretical background for a sociological approach to alcohol consumption. Focusing exclusively on alcoholism or excessive drinking neglects a number of social dimensions inherent in alcohol consumption. Therefore, when considering this phenomenon in sociological terms, clear theoretical-methodological starting points should be established in order to understand the social consumption of alcohol. The main objective of this paper was to provide a basic paradigmatic and epistemological framework for the development of a sociology of alcohol consumption. The paper starts from the assumption that two theoretical-methodological principles should be considered: methodological individualism and methodological situationism. Each of these approaches has certain advantages and disadvantages, but in further conceptualising the paradigmatic foundations of the sociology of alcohol consumption, the paper proposed a two-level approach, that is, a synthesis of methodological situationism and methodological individualism. However, this synthesis does not constitute a theory of the sociology of alcohol consumption, but a framework for a sociological approach to the phenomenon, as well as the possibility of overcoming the problems presented in the sociological analysis of this topic.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46495623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
U radu se analiziraju medijske reprezentacije migranata s posebnim fokusom na slučaj pokušaja uspostave prihvatilišta za tražitelje azila u naselju Mala Gorica kod Petrinje. Kretanja prisilnih migranata kroz zemlje na balkanskoj ruti nakon zatvaranja Balkanskog koridora stavljaju države u regiji u izazovnu poziciju upravljanja migracijama, te eventualne organizacije i provedbe prihvata i integracije za one koji su u potrebi za međunarodnom izbjegličkom zaštitom ili kojima je ona odobrena. Odabir lokacije i izgradnja ili adaptacija smještajnih objekata, tj. prihvatilišta za tražitelje međunarodne zaštite (azila), često mogu biti mjesta otpora i protesta lokalnog stanovništva zbog odluka vlasti da upravo u njihovoj sredini uspostavi objekt tog tipa i namjene. U procesu informiranja građana i zauzimanja stavova prema "drugima", mediji igraju važnu ulogu budući da, uz druge društvene aktere na pozicijama moći, dominantno (su)oblikuju javni diskurs. Korištenjem kvalitativne analize sadržaja medijskih članaka objavljenih od studenoga 2018. do svibnja 2019. godine (N-52) – i temeljene na pristupu analizi dokumenata Altheidea i Schneidera (2017) – identificirani su diskursi, teme i okviri koji pridonose razumijevanju medijske reprezentacije spomenutog fenomena. Prema analizi argumentacije različitih aktera identificirane su tri teme: odnos žrtve i nasilnika, odnos vlasti i naroda te odnos između "centra" (Zagreb) i "periferije" (Petrinja) – sve tri, u različitim varijacijama, upućuju na problem nejednakosti, odnosno dominacije i subordinacije. Nastavno na njih, identificirana su dva dominantna medijska okvira u izvještavanju: diskurzivna konstrukcija migranata kao društveni problem i sukob kao konstitutivna relacija između društvenih aktera. Taj tip istraživanja omogućuje kritičko promišljanje načina na koji mediji reprezentiraju marginalizirane društvene skupine poput tražitelja azila, što onda potencijalno omogućuje i promjenu tih reprezentacija u javnoj sferi, i to na načine koji bi pridonijeli stvaranju društvenih preduvjeta za inkluzivni i humani tretman marginaliziranih skupina.
这项工作分析了移民的媒体代表，特别关注试图在Petrinje的Little Gorica村建立寻求庇护者的问题。Kretanja prisilnih migranata kroz zemlje na balkanskoj ruti nakon zatvaranja Balkanskog koridora stavljaju države u regiji u izazovnu poziciju upravlja migracijama，这是一个由prihvata证明的组织，我整合了一个koji su u potrebi za meřunarodnom izbjegličkom zaštitom ili kojima je ona odobrena。住宿设施的选择、建造或改造，即国际保护（庇护）寻求者，往往可能是当地人民抵抗和抗议的地方，因为政府决定直接在他们的中心设立对象和名称。在向公民提供信息和对他人采取立场的过程中，媒体发挥着重要作用，因为与其他处于权力地位的社会行为者一起，媒体形成了主导性的公共辩论。使用自2018年11月以来发表的媒体文章内容的质量分析。截至2019年5月。第52年（N-52年）——基于对Altheide和Schneider文件（2017年）的分析——确定了有助于理解媒体对这一现象的描述的讨论、主题和框架。对不同行为者论点的分析确定了三个主题：受害者与暴力行为之间的关系、当局与人民之间的关系以及中心（萨格勒布）与外围（皮特林）之间的关系——所有三个不同的变量都表明了不平等、统治和从属。此外，报告中确定了两个主要的媒体框架：将移民的歧视性建构视为社会问题，将冲突视为社会行为者之间的宪法关系。这类研究使人们能够批判性地思考媒体代表边缘化社会群体（如寻求庇护者）的方式，从而有可能在公共领域实现和改变这些代表，从而有助于创造包容和人道对待边缘化群体的社会条件。
{"title":"\"Nas nitko niš' ni' pital\": Medijske reprezentacije slučaja pokušaja uspostave prihvatilišta za tražitelje azila kod Petrinje","authors":"Helena Popović, Drago Župarić-Iljić, Kruno Kardov","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.2.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.2.1","url":null,"abstract":"U radu se analiziraju medijske reprezentacije migranata s posebnim fokusom na slučaj pokušaja uspostave prihvatilišta za tražitelje azila u naselju Mala Gorica kod Petrinje. Kretanja prisilnih migranata kroz zemlje na balkanskoj ruti nakon zatvaranja Balkanskog koridora stavljaju države u regiji u izazovnu poziciju upravljanja migracijama, te eventualne organizacije i provedbe prihvata i integracije za one koji su u potrebi za međunarodnom izbjegličkom zaštitom ili kojima je ona odobrena. Odabir lokacije i izgradnja ili adaptacija smještajnih objekata, tj. prihvatilišta za tražitelje međunarodne zaštite (azila), često mogu biti mjesta otpora i protesta lokalnog stanovništva zbog odluka vlasti da upravo u njihovoj sredini uspostavi objekt tog tipa i namjene. U procesu informiranja građana i zauzimanja stavova prema \"drugima\", mediji igraju važnu ulogu budući da, uz druge društvene aktere na pozicijama moći, dominantno (su)oblikuju javni diskurs. Korištenjem kvalitativne analize sadržaja medijskih članaka objavljenih od studenoga 2018. do svibnja 2019. godine (N-52) – i temeljene na pristupu analizi dokumenata Altheidea i Schneidera (2017) – identificirani su diskursi, teme i okviri koji pridonose razumijevanju medijske reprezentacije spomenutog fenomena. Prema analizi argumentacije različitih aktera identificirane su tri teme: odnos žrtve i nasilnika, odnos vlasti i naroda te odnos između \"centra\" (Zagreb) i \"periferije\" (Petrinja) – sve tri, u različitim varijacijama, upućuju na problem nejednakosti, odnosno dominacije i subordinacije. Nastavno na njih, identificirana su dva dominantna medijska okvira u izvještavanju: diskurzivna konstrukcija migranata kao društveni problem i sukob kao konstitutivna relacija između društvenih aktera. Taj tip istraživanja omogućuje kritičko promišljanje načina na koji mediji reprezentiraju marginalizirane društvene skupine poput tražitelja azila, što onda potencijalno omogućuje i promjenu tih reprezentacija u javnoj sferi, i to na načine koji bi pridonijeli stvaranju društvenih preduvjeta za inkluzivni i humani tretman marginaliziranih skupina.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48919812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This narrative is an autoethnographic study of how discrimination and prejudice counteract the academic meritocratic system. In Sweden, which is one of the most gender-equal countries in the world, opposition to gender equality and prejudices against what is considered the Other can be hidden and thus reproduced in decision-making processes and structures. This narrative shows how a professorial recruitment process bypassed the meritocratic system i.e., the system in which qualifications and educational results in combination with the individual’s achievements should play the greatest role in the promotion process. This is a story about how the supposed meritocracy is twisted and manipulated within university contexts and how the “temperament” of a foreign female researcher is utilised to exclude her from entering through the coveted doors of academic departments. Different experiences, characterised by demanding conditions, have been analysed with the help of gender theoretical perspectives, opposition to gender equality, intercultural perspectives and a number of social psychological perspectives linked to prejudice. The description is interwoven with previous experiences from younger years, which together contribute to an increased understanding of the individual narrative and its specific context.
{"title":"“It will be difficult for you to move on from this…” An Autoethnographic Study of Hitting the Glass Ceiling in an Academic Recruitment Process","authors":"Aida Alvinius","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"This narrative is an autoethnographic study of how discrimination and prejudice counteract the academic meritocratic system. In Sweden, which is one of the most gender-equal countries in the world, opposition to gender equality and prejudices against what is considered the Other can be hidden and thus reproduced in decision-making processes and structures. This narrative shows how a professorial recruitment process bypassed the meritocratic system i.e., the system in which qualifications and educational results in combination with the individual’s achievements should play the greatest role in the promotion process. This is a story about how the supposed meritocracy is twisted and manipulated within university contexts and how the “temperament” of a foreign female researcher is utilised to exclude her from entering through the coveted doors of academic departments. Different experiences, characterised by demanding conditions, have been analysed with the help of gender theoretical perspectives, opposition to gender equality, intercultural perspectives and a number of social psychological perspectives linked to prejudice. The description is interwoven with previous experiences from younger years, which together contribute to an increased understanding of the individual narrative and its specific context.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49518034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ovaj članak obrađuje Novo čitanje Marxa, interpretaciju fokusiranu na analizu društvenih i vrijednosnih oblika te pripadajućih društvenih odnosa. Marxova analiza društvenih oblika omogućuje razlikovanje određenih apstrakcija (roba i kapital u kapitalističkom načinu proizvodnje) od općih (proizvod, novac), denaturalizira ekonomsko viđenje proizvodnje i otvara put k mogućem sagledavanju različitih načina proizvodnje i njihovih društvenih karaktera. U članku se tvrdi da analiza društvenih oblika otvara prostor da se polju koje konvencionalno pripada ekonomiji, čije napuštanje obilježava sociologiju veći dio njezine povijesti, ponovo pristupi sociološkom analizom i time ukaže na društvene dimenzije predmeta istraživanja, ujedno propitujući i osporavajući monopol ekonomskih teorija i kategorija. Pokazuje se veza između Marxove analize društvenih oblika i djela drugih klasičnih sociologa te se otvara rasprava o relevantnosti za ekonomsku sociologiju. Pregledom nove ekonomske sociologije ukazuje se na njezine veberijanske korijene koji drastično sužavaju prostor za integraciju Marxova rada. Tvrdi se da je ovdje predstavljenom čitanju Marxa prostor ipak otvoren u šire shvaćenoj suvremenoj ekonomskoj sociologiji koja uključuje širi spektar pristupa i zadržava multiparadigmatski karakter sociologije. Zaključno se ukazuje na kontekst domaće sociologije, njezina odnosa s marksizmom i mogućnostima za unapređenje sociološke literature revalorizacijom marksizma kroz prizmu Novog čitanja Marxa.
{"title":"Marxova analiza društvenih oblika i ekonomska sociologija","authors":"Toni Prug","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.1.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.1.4","url":null,"abstract":"Ovaj članak obrađuje Novo čitanje Marxa, interpretaciju fokusiranu na analizu društvenih i vrijednosnih oblika te pripadajućih društvenih odnosa. Marxova analiza društvenih oblika omogućuje razlikovanje određenih apstrakcija (roba i kapital u kapitalističkom načinu proizvodnje) od općih (proizvod, novac), denaturalizira ekonomsko viđenje proizvodnje i otvara put k mogućem sagledavanju različitih načina proizvodnje i njihovih društvenih karaktera. U članku se tvrdi da analiza društvenih oblika otvara prostor da se polju koje konvencionalno pripada ekonomiji, čije napuštanje obilježava sociologiju veći dio njezine povijesti, ponovo pristupi sociološkom analizom i time ukaže na društvene dimenzije predmeta istraživanja, ujedno propitujući i osporavajući monopol ekonomskih teorija i kategorija. Pokazuje se veza između Marxove analize društvenih oblika i djela drugih klasičnih sociologa te se otvara rasprava o relevantnosti za ekonomsku sociologiju. Pregledom nove ekonomske sociologije ukazuje se na njezine veberijanske korijene koji drastično sužavaju prostor za integraciju Marxova rada. Tvrdi se da je ovdje predstavljenom čitanju Marxa prostor ipak otvoren u šire shvaćenoj suvremenoj ekonomskoj sociologiji koja uključuje širi spektar pristupa i zadržava multiparadigmatski karakter sociologije. Zaključno se ukazuje na kontekst domaće sociologije, njezina odnosa s marksizmom i mogućnostima za unapređenje sociološke literature revalorizacijom marksizma kroz prizmu Novog čitanja Marxa.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47089636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
U radu se, na temelju podataka prikupljenih u istraživanjima koja je u osam vremenskih točaka u proteklih dvadeset godina na reprezentativnom uzorku hrvatskih građana proveo Fakultet političkih znanosti, analizira stanje institucionalnog povjerenja u Hrvatskoj. Oslanjajući se na teorijske koncepte Davida Eastona i Pippe Norris te uvažavajući prethodne studije o institucionalnom povjerenju u Hrvatskoj, rad donosi i neke nove elemente. Dok većina prethodnih radova obuhvaća najviše tri točke mjerenja u kratkom vremenskom rasponu i analizi latentne strukture institucionalnog povjerenja pristupa kroz eksploratorni pristup, ovaj se rad temelji na analizi osam vremenskih točaka i analizira prikladnost postojećih teorijskih modela. Usto, analiza fluktuacija u razinama institucionalnog povjerenja temelji se na utvrđivanju invarijantnosti mjerenja, što je važan metodološki doprinos rada. Osnovni rezultati studije mogu se podijeliti u tri grupe. Prvo, na deskriptivnoj razini utvrdili smo da je povjerenje građana u pojedine institucije najčešće ispod srednje vrijednosti na ljestvici od 1 do 5, osim u slučajevima vojske i policije. Drugo, analiza pokazuje da hrvatski građani razlikuju dva tipa institucionalnog povjerenja – povjerenje u predstavničke institucije i povjerenje u institucije sigurnosti. Treće, analiza je pokazala kako se u razdoblju od 1999. do 2020. povjerenje građana u predstavničke institucije smanjilo, dok je povjerenje u institucije sigurnosti ostalo izrazito stabilno. Na temelju toga moguće je izvesti dva važna zaključka. Ponajprije, korištenje invarijantnosti mjerenja trebalo bi postati standardom za buduća istraživanja povjerenja u kojima se uspoređuju različite vremenske točke. Potom, niska razina povjerenja u predstavničke institucije sugerira otuđenost građana od tih institucija i predstavlja problem funkcioniranju predstavničke demokracije u Hrvatskoj.
{"title":"Stabilnost i/ili promjene? Povjerenje u institucije u Hrvatskoj od 1999. do 2020.","authors":"Kosta Bovan, Nikola Baketa","doi":"10.5613/rzs.52.1.0315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.52.1.0315","url":null,"abstract":"U radu se, na temelju podataka prikupljenih u istraživanjima koja je u osam vremenskih točaka u proteklih dvadeset godina na reprezentativnom uzorku hrvatskih građana proveo Fakultet političkih znanosti, analizira stanje institucionalnog povjerenja u Hrvatskoj. Oslanjajući se na teorijske koncepte Davida Eastona i Pippe Norris te uvažavajući prethodne studije o institucionalnom povjerenju u Hrvatskoj, rad donosi i neke nove elemente. Dok većina prethodnih radova obuhvaća najviše tri točke mjerenja u kratkom vremenskom rasponu i analizi latentne strukture institucionalnog povjerenja pristupa kroz eksploratorni pristup, ovaj se rad temelji na analizi osam vremenskih točaka i analizira prikladnost postojećih teorijskih modela. Usto, analiza fluktuacija u razinama institucionalnog povjerenja temelji se na utvrđivanju invarijantnosti mjerenja, što je važan metodološki doprinos rada. Osnovni rezultati studije mogu se podijeliti u tri grupe. Prvo, na deskriptivnoj razini utvrdili smo da je povjerenje građana u pojedine institucije najčešće ispod srednje vrijednosti na ljestvici od 1 do 5, osim u slučajevima vojske i policije. Drugo, analiza pokazuje da hrvatski građani razlikuju dva tipa institucionalnog povjerenja – povjerenje u predstavničke institucije i povjerenje u institucije sigurnosti. Treće, analiza je pokazala kako se u razdoblju od 1999. do 2020. povjerenje građana u predstavničke institucije smanjilo, dok je povjerenje u institucije sigurnosti ostalo izrazito stabilno. Na temelju toga moguće je izvesti dva važna zaključka. Ponajprije, korištenje invarijantnosti mjerenja trebalo bi postati standardom za buduća istraživanja povjerenja u kojima se uspoređuju različite vremenske točke. Potom, niska razina povjerenja u predstavničke institucije sugerira otuđenost građana od tih institucija i predstavlja problem funkcioniranju predstavničke demokracije u Hrvatskoj.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46571889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：