Pub Date : 2023-11-24DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i2.77462
A. S. Sudarwanto, Adi Sulistiyono, M. H. Asrori S, Arief Suryono, Y. T. Muryanto, D. Cahyaningsih, Dona Budi Kharisma
This article aims to describe the relevance of the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) in the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law. The approach used is a historical approach (historical approach) using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collection technique used is the literature study technique. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that so far the focus of traditional economic analysts has only highlighted that inventors or holders of exclusive IPR are entitled to incentives or rewards for their findings. Apart from that, giving incentives is also to encourage people to make discoveries that are beneficial to human life. However, they did not highlight the high cost of accessing or using their findings. Even the cost of accessing IP exceeds the cost of the production margin of IP itself. In the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law, the condition of unbalanced margins can cause injustice.
{"title":"INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THEORY OF ECONOMICS ANALYSIS OF LAW PERSPECTIVE","authors":"A. S. Sudarwanto, Adi Sulistiyono, M. H. Asrori S, Arief Suryono, Y. T. Muryanto, D. Cahyaningsih, Dona Budi Kharisma","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i2.77462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i2.77462","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to describe the relevance of the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) in the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law. The approach used is a historical approach (historical approach) using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collection technique used is the literature study technique. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that so far the focus of traditional economic analysts has only highlighted that inventors or holders of exclusive IPR are entitled to incentives or rewards for their findings. Apart from that, giving incentives is also to encourage people to make discoveries that are beneficial to human life. However, they did not highlight the high cost of accessing or using their findings. Even the cost of accessing IP exceeds the cost of the production margin of IP itself. In the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law, the condition of unbalanced margins can cause injustice.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"471 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139240593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-24DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i2.49845
Eva Ida Fitria Asiati, Al. Sentot Sudarwanto
This article aims to examine the role of cooperatives in supporting the strengthening of MSMEs Convection Cloth Masks during the Covid-19 pandemic.This study uses empirical research methods. This legal research uses legal resources in the form of legal materials both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data types used are Secondary data and Primary data. Data collection techniques are used through literature studies, interviews, and data analysts. The results showed that cooperatives play an active role in supporting the strengthening of MSMEs Convection in Pati Regency.
{"title":"PERAN KOPERASI DALAM MENDUKUNG PENGUATAN UMKM KONVEKSI DI KABUPATEN PATI PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19","authors":"Eva Ida Fitria Asiati, Al. Sentot Sudarwanto","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i2.49845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i2.49845","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to examine the role of cooperatives in supporting the strengthening of MSMEs Convection Cloth Masks during the Covid-19 pandemic.This study uses empirical research methods. This legal research uses legal resources in the form of legal materials both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data types used are Secondary data and Primary data. Data collection techniques are used through literature studies, interviews, and data analysts. The results showed that cooperatives play an active role in supporting the strengthening of MSMEs Convection in Pati Regency.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"2010 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139239541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-24DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i2.49272
Hakim Harismawan Mubarak, Dona Budi Kharisma
This article aims to explain the legal position of the state in the confiscation of a criminal act of corruption that is faced with confiscation in bankruptcy, position, and legal protection for separatist creditors in the execution of bankruptcy assets when confronted with confiscation in a criminal act of corruption. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the position of creditors is weak in the sense that they do not have legal certainty when the execution of the bankruptcy assets is faced with seizure in a corruption case, so that no party can execute the bankruptcy property which is included in the confiscation in the case of crime. criminal corruption until there is a verdict with permanent legal force, and the loss to the state has been paid off based on the sale of assets included in the assets obtained from the proceeds of the criminal act of corruption as stipulated in the court decision. In the confiscation of a corruption crime case, the principle of public interest applies so that the position of the confiscation in the corruption case is stronger than the seizure contained in the execution of the bankruptcy bailout which in fact is the application of the principle of personal interest. This has resulted in a stronger public interest principle as emphasized in the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (vide paragraph IV) along with its torso in Articles 33 and 44 have outlined that all government officials must carry out activities leading to the implementation. public interest.
本文旨在解释国家在面临破产没收的腐败犯罪行为中的法律地位、立场，以及在面临破产没收的腐败犯罪行为时，在执行破产资产时对分离主义债权人的法律保护。采用的研究方法是法定方法和案例方法的规范性法律研究。根据研究结果可以得出这样的结论，即在执行破产财产时，债权人在腐败案件中面临被扣押的情况时，他们的地位是弱势的，因此，在没有具有永久法律效力的判决之前，任何一方都不能执行腐败犯罪行为没收中包含的破产财产，并且根据法院判决中规定的出售腐败犯罪行为所得资产中包含的资产，国家的损失已经得到了清偿。在腐败犯罪案件的没收中，适用的是公共利益原则，因此，腐败案件中没收的地位要强于破产救助执行中的扣押，后者实际上是个人利益原则的适用。1945 年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》序言（见第 IV 段）及其第 33 条和第 44 条的躯干都强调，所有政府官员都必须开展旨在实现公共利益的活动。
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KREDITOR SEPARATIS DALAM EKSEKUSI HARTA BOEDEL PAILIT APABILA DIHADAPKAN DENGAN SITA PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI","authors":"Hakim Harismawan Mubarak, Dona Budi Kharisma","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i2.49272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i2.49272","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to explain the legal position of the state in the confiscation of a criminal act of corruption that is faced with confiscation in bankruptcy, position, and legal protection for separatist creditors in the execution of bankruptcy assets when confronted with confiscation in a criminal act of corruption. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the position of creditors is weak in the sense that they do not have legal certainty when the execution of the bankruptcy assets is faced with seizure in a corruption case, so that no party can execute the bankruptcy property which is included in the confiscation in the case of crime. criminal corruption until there is a verdict with permanent legal force, and the loss to the state has been paid off based on the sale of assets included in the assets obtained from the proceeds of the criminal act of corruption as stipulated in the court decision. In the confiscation of a corruption crime case, the principle of public interest applies so that the position of the confiscation in the corruption case is stronger than the seizure contained in the execution of the bankruptcy bailout which in fact is the application of the principle of personal interest. This has resulted in a stronger public interest principle as emphasized in the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (vide paragraph IV) along with its torso in Articles 33 and 44 have outlined that all government officials must carry out activities leading to the implementation. public interest.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"37 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139241216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-24DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i2.49016
Rally Nufi Khafialima Zahra, Kukuh Tejomurti
AbstractThis article aims to know the legal problem and solution for FinTech P2P Lending Company that is not doing verification or rechecking their Borrowers. This type of article is normative legal research that is prescriptive to find a new concept for resolving the legal problem by using the statute approach. This article uses secondary data with primary legal material and library research. The data analysis technique used by the author is a deduction and syllogism analysis. The result of this research is a Borrower who committing fraud by using other person’s identity or fake account can be found because of personal data leaks dan sells personal data by social media. Moreover, fake account on P2P Lending also caused by FinTech P2P Lending Company who is not using KYC Principles as appropriate in the bank or not rechecking their Borrowers. A solution for FinTech P2P Lending Company who wants to apply KYC Principles in their P2P Lending platform is using e-KYC.Keywords: Fake accounts; e-KYC; P2P LendingAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat hukum serta solusi bagi Penyelenggara FinTech P2P Lending yang tidak melakukan verifikasi atau pemeriksaan ulang terhadap Penerima Pinjamannya. Artikel ini termasuk ke dalam jenis penelitian normatif yang bersifat preskriptif untuk menemukan konsep baru guna menjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Data yang digunakan dalam artikel ini merupakan data sekunder dengan bahan hukum primer yang menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data hukum kepustakaan. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah teknik analisis data yang bersifat deduksi dengan metode silogisme. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat Penerima Pinajaman yang melakukan penipuan identitas atau munculnya akun palsu yang disebabkan adanya kebocoran data pribadi dan praktik jual-beli data pribadi pada media sosial. Selain itu, munculnya akun palsu pada P2P Lending juga disebabkan karena Penyelenggara FinTech P2P Lending tidak menerapkan prinsip KYC layaknya perbankan atau melakukan pemeriksaan ulang terhadap Penerima Pinjamannya. Solusi bagi Penyelenggara FinTech P2P Lending yang ingin menerapkan prinsip KYC pada platform P2P Lending miliknya adalah dengan menggunakan e-KYC.Kata Kunci: Akun palsu; e-KYC; P2P Lending
摘要 本文旨在了解金融科技 P2P 借贷公司未对借款人进行核实或复查的法律问题及解决方案。此类文章属于规范性法学研究，其目的是通过成文法的方法找到解决法律问题的新概念。本文使用了二手数据、主要法律材料和图书馆研究。作者使用的数据分析技术是演绎法和对偶分析法。研究结果表明，使用他人身份或虚假账户进行诈骗的借款人可因个人资料泄露和通过社交媒体出售个人资料而被发现。此外，P2P 网络借贷中的虚假账户也是由于金融科技 P2P 网络借贷公司没有按照银行的 KYC 原则使用，或没有对借款人进行复查而造成的。对于希望在其 P2P 借贷平台中应用 KYC 原则的金融科技 P2P 借贷公司来说，一个解决方案就是使用 e-KYC：Fake accounts; e-KYC; P2P LendingAbstract This article aims to find out the legal consequences and solutions for FinTech P2P Lending Organisers who do not verify or recheck their Borrowers.本文属于规范性研究，其本质是通过法定方法寻找新概念来回答当前的法律问题。本文使用的数据是二手数据，并利用图书馆法律数据收集技术收集了原始法律材料。作者使用的数据分析技术是演绎法数据分析技术，并采用了三段论方法。结果显示，由于个人数据泄露和在社交媒体上买卖个人数据的做法，有 Pinajaman 收件人实施身份欺诈或出现假账户。此外，P2P 网络借贷中假冒账户的出现也是由于 P2P 网络借贷金融科技组织者没有像银行一样执行 KYC 原则或对贷款接受者进行重新审查。对于希望在其 P2P 借贷平台上应用 KYC 原则的 P2P 借贷金融科技组织者来说，解决方案就是使用 e-KYC：假账户；e-KYC；P2P 网络借贷
{"title":"PENERAPAN PRINSIP KYC PADA FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY P2P LENDING YANG AKOMODATIF BAGI PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN","authors":"Rally Nufi Khafialima Zahra, Kukuh Tejomurti","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i2.49016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i2.49016","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article aims to know the legal problem and solution for FinTech P2P Lending Company that is not doing verification or rechecking their Borrowers. This type of article is normative legal research that is prescriptive to find a new concept for resolving the legal problem by using the statute approach. This article uses secondary data with primary legal material and library research. The data analysis technique used by the author is a deduction and syllogism analysis. The result of this research is a Borrower who committing fraud by using other person’s identity or fake account can be found because of personal data leaks dan sells personal data by social media. Moreover, fake account on P2P Lending also caused by FinTech P2P Lending Company who is not using KYC Principles as appropriate in the bank or not rechecking their Borrowers. A solution for FinTech P2P Lending Company who wants to apply KYC Principles in their P2P Lending platform is using e-KYC.Keywords: Fake accounts; e-KYC; P2P LendingAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat hukum serta solusi bagi Penyelenggara FinTech P2P Lending yang tidak melakukan verifikasi atau pemeriksaan ulang terhadap Penerima Pinjamannya. Artikel ini termasuk ke dalam jenis penelitian normatif yang bersifat preskriptif untuk menemukan konsep baru guna menjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Data yang digunakan dalam artikel ini merupakan data sekunder dengan bahan hukum primer yang menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data hukum kepustakaan. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah teknik analisis data yang bersifat deduksi dengan metode silogisme. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat Penerima Pinajaman yang melakukan penipuan identitas atau munculnya akun palsu yang disebabkan adanya kebocoran data pribadi dan praktik jual-beli data pribadi pada media sosial. Selain itu, munculnya akun palsu pada P2P Lending juga disebabkan karena Penyelenggara FinTech P2P Lending tidak menerapkan prinsip KYC layaknya perbankan atau melakukan pemeriksaan ulang terhadap Penerima Pinjamannya. Solusi bagi Penyelenggara FinTech P2P Lending yang ingin menerapkan prinsip KYC pada platform P2P Lending miliknya adalah dengan menggunakan e-KYC.Kata Kunci: Akun palsu; e-KYC; P2P Lending","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"62 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139238715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-24DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i2.49342
Muhammad Excel Suryaprabaswara, Penulis Korespondensi, Dosen Fakultas, Hukum Universitas, Sebelas Maret, Hukum Perbankan
This article describes and examines the problem. First, how is the legal problematic if the application of the Currency Board System is carried out in Indonesia. Based on the results of the research, it shows that the problems found are that the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 1999 concerning Bank Indonesia and Law Number 24 of 1999 concerning Foreign Exchange Flows and the Exchange Rate System have not accommodated application of the Currency Board System. The law clearly stipulates that Indonesia only adopts a floating exchange rate system. The response from banking law experts calls for the need for a new law and / or amendments to the old law, namely Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 1999 concerning Bank Indonesia and Law Number 24 of 1999 concerning Foreign Exchange Flows and Exchange Rate System.
{"title":"PROBLEMATIK HUKUM PENERAPAN CURRENCY BOARD SYSTEM DI INDONESIA","authors":"Muhammad Excel Suryaprabaswara, Penulis Korespondensi, Dosen Fakultas, Hukum Universitas, Sebelas Maret, Hukum Perbankan","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i2.49342","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i2.49342","url":null,"abstract":"This article describes and examines the problem. First, how is the legal problematic if the application of the Currency Board System is carried out in Indonesia. Based on the results of the research, it shows that the problems found are that the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 1999 concerning Bank Indonesia and Law Number 24 of 1999 concerning Foreign Exchange Flows and the Exchange Rate System have not accommodated application of the Currency Board System. The law clearly stipulates that Indonesia only adopts a floating exchange rate system. The response from banking law experts calls for the need for a new law and / or amendments to the old law, namely Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 1999 concerning Bank Indonesia and Law Number 24 of 1999 concerning Foreign Exchange Flows and Exchange Rate System.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"140 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139239863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-19DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.47322
Raden Fajar Agung Kusumahwardhana
The purpose of writing this article aims is to find out how the effectiveness of the implementation of the First To File principle in the trademark registration system and what problems arise from the application of the First To File principle in protecting trademark rights in Indonesia.This research is descriptive analytical as a description of a situation, and provides data about a situation. Collecting data in this writing is done in literature by examining data consisting of primary legal material and secondary legal material, then the data is analyzed using normative-qualitative methods.The results of the writing of this article indicate that Law Number 21 of 1961 concerning Company Marks and Commercial Trademarks which adhere to the First To Use system has been replaced by Law Number 19 of 1992 concerning Trademarks which applies the First To File principle. The First To File principle in the trademark registration system provides more legal certainty because it appoints the first registrant as the legal owner of a mark if it has passed a series of mark registration and has a trademark certificate, but in its implementation there are problems with the absence of clear and firm norms related to the application of "equality in essence. "So as to open up opportunities for the emergence of popularity of Well-Known Mark. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights; Trademark; First To File.
{"title":"EFEKTIVITAS PRINSIP FIRST TO FILE PADA SISTEM PENDAFTARAN MEREK DALAM MELINDUNGI HAK MEREK","authors":"Raden Fajar Agung Kusumahwardhana","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i1.47322","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i1.47322","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of writing this article aims is to find out how the effectiveness of the implementation of the First To File principle in the trademark registration system and what problems arise from the application of the First To File principle in protecting trademark rights in Indonesia.This research is descriptive analytical as a description of a situation, and provides data about a situation. Collecting data in this writing is done in literature by examining data consisting of primary legal material and secondary legal material, then the data is analyzed using normative-qualitative methods.The results of the writing of this article indicate that Law Number 21 of 1961 concerning Company Marks and Commercial Trademarks which adhere to the First To Use system has been replaced by Law Number 19 of 1992 concerning Trademarks which applies the First To File principle. The First To File principle in the trademark registration system provides more legal certainty because it appoints the first registrant as the legal owner of a mark if it has passed a series of mark registration and has a trademark certificate, but in its implementation there are problems with the absence of clear and firm norms related to the application of \"equality in essence. \"So as to open up opportunities for the emergence of popularity of Well-Known Mark. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights; Trademark; First To File.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"03 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127255306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-19DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.47629
Muhamad Ghiefary Akbar Noorsyamsoe
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi pertanggung jawaban hukum pengelola Mall yang terjadi dalam proses praktik penjualan software komputer bajakan yang dilakukan oleh pelaku usaha dan mengkaji hambatan hukum pengelola mall berdasarkan UndangUndang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Penelitian ini bersifat preskriptif, dengan jenis penelitian empris. Hasil penelitian ini Pengelola mall tidak dapat dipertanggung jawabkan atas perbuatannya membiarkan penjualan atas barang-barang hasil pelanggaran hak cipta dengan syarat pengelola mall dapat membuktikan bahwa dirinya tidak mengetahui bahwa barang yang dijual tersebut merupakan hasil pelanggaran hak cipta. Faktor yang menjadi penghambat dalam penegakan UUHC di Mall Ambassador adalah tidak adanya perjanjian yang tertulis antara pengelola mall dengan pelaku usaha akan barang apa yang akan dijual di lapaknya tersebut, sulitnya menemukan barang bukti dagang hasil pelanggaran hak cipta, dan delik aduan yang menjadi penghambat dalam lamanya penyidik untuk bertindak karena harus ada aduan terlebih dahulu.
{"title":"PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN HUKUM PENGELOLA MALL TERHADAP PRAKTIK PENJUALAN SOFTWARE KOMPUTER BAJAKAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PELAKU USAHA BERDASARKAN UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA","authors":"Muhamad Ghiefary Akbar Noorsyamsoe","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i1.47629","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i1.47629","url":null,"abstract":"Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi pertanggung jawaban hukum pengelola Mall yang terjadi dalam proses praktik penjualan software komputer bajakan yang dilakukan oleh pelaku usaha dan mengkaji hambatan hukum pengelola mall berdasarkan UndangUndang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Penelitian ini bersifat preskriptif, dengan jenis penelitian empris. Hasil penelitian ini Pengelola mall tidak dapat dipertanggung jawabkan atas perbuatannya membiarkan penjualan atas barang-barang hasil pelanggaran hak cipta dengan syarat pengelola mall dapat membuktikan bahwa dirinya tidak mengetahui bahwa barang yang dijual tersebut merupakan hasil pelanggaran hak cipta. Faktor yang menjadi penghambat dalam penegakan UUHC di Mall Ambassador adalah tidak adanya perjanjian yang tertulis antara pengelola mall dengan pelaku usaha akan barang apa yang akan dijual di lapaknya tersebut, sulitnya menemukan barang bukti dagang hasil pelanggaran hak cipta, dan delik aduan yang menjadi penghambat dalam lamanya penyidik untuk bertindak karena harus ada aduan terlebih dahulu.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133447106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-19DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.45389
Elsa Halida Saputri
This article aimsto assess the protection carried out by airlines for airplane passengers if they failed to protect their personal data. Methode used in this article is a sociological or empirical legal research method named descriptive, and the approach research used a qualitative approach that produces descriptive data. In this case of laws used source of invitation primary legal materials and secondary legal materials by means of literature studies and interviews. Data analysis technique used is qualitative analysis with qualitative methods. This law written to shows that apart from the existence of legal responsibility as well as ethical responsibility which aims to retain consumers, by revising the contents of the work agreement between Malindo Air and GoQuo. Malindo Air itself manages all consumer passwords automatically and urges consumers to change the password used for Malindo Miles. Malindo Air and GoQuo also reported 2 (two) former GoQuo employees who have distributed Malindo Air passanger personal data.
Key words: personal data; flight protection measures; Malindo Air
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DATA PRIBADI PENUMPANG PESAWAT UDARA (Studi Kasus Terungkapnya Data Penumpang Malindo Air)","authors":"Elsa Halida Saputri","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i1.45389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i1.45389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><em>This </em><em>article aims</em><em> </em><em>to assess</em><em> the protection carried out by airlines for airplane passengers if they failed to protect their personal data. Methode used in this </em><em>article </em><em>is a sociological or empirical legal research method named descriptive, and the approach research used a qualitative approach that produces descriptive data. In this case of laws used source of invitation primary legal materials and secondary legal materials by means of literature studies and interviews. Data analysis technique used is qualitative analysis with qualitative methods. This law written to shows that apart from the existence of legal responsibility as well as ethical responsibility which aims to retain consumers, by revising the contents of the work agreement between Malindo Air and GoQuo. Malindo Air itself manages all consumer passwords automatically and urges consumers to change the password used for Malindo Miles</em><em>.</em><em> Malindo Air and GoQuo also reported 2 (two) former GoQuo employees who have distributed Malindo Air passanger personal data.</em><em></em></p><p><em>Key words</em><em>: personal dat</em><em>a;</em><em> flight protection measures</em><em>;</em><em> Malindo Air</em><em></em></p>","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129799485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-19DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.72888
Rehulina Sitepu
ABSTRAK: Penyelesaian sengketa alternative secara online dilakukan dengan menggabungkan informasi pengolahan teknologi komputer dengan fasilitas jaringan komunikasi internet. Yang menjadi permasalahannya adalah bagaimana pengaturan arbitrase sebagai penyelesaian sengketa alternatif secara online berasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada di Indonesia saat ini sesuai dengan perkembangan dan kebutuhan masyarkat? Metode penelitian yang dipakai adalah penelitian hukum normative dengan menggunakan sumber penelitian adalah data sekunder yang terdiri atas bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Berdasarkan UU Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif yang menyebutkan bahwa dengan melakukan pertukaran surat, pertukaran teleks, fkasimil, e-mail dan atau bentuk sarana komunikasi lainnya yang disertai dengan suatu catatan penerimaan oleh para pihak yang bersenkgeta.
{"title":"PENGATURAN ARBITRASE SEBAGAI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ALTERNATIVE SECARA ONLINE","authors":"Rehulina Sitepu","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i1.72888","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i1.72888","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRAK: Penyelesaian sengketa alternative secara online dilakukan dengan menggabungkan informasi pengolahan teknologi komputer dengan fasilitas jaringan komunikasi internet. Yang menjadi permasalahannya adalah bagaimana pengaturan arbitrase sebagai penyelesaian sengketa alternatif secara online berasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada di Indonesia saat ini sesuai dengan perkembangan dan kebutuhan masyarkat? Metode penelitian yang dipakai adalah penelitian hukum normative dengan menggunakan sumber penelitian adalah data sekunder yang terdiri atas bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Berdasarkan UU Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif yang menyebutkan bahwa dengan melakukan pertukaran surat, pertukaran teleks, fkasimil, e-mail dan atau bentuk sarana komunikasi lainnya yang disertai dengan suatu catatan penerimaan oleh para pihak yang bersenkgeta.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114902089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-19DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i1.45950
Larassati Putri Syaflizar
AbstractThis article aims to determine the principles of responsibility for the directors of BUMN (Persero) based on the principles of business judgment rule in the perspective of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The data used are secondary data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. The data is then processed and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the research show that the Company Law and the principles it adheres to reflect that the directors are fully responsible for the management of the Company with the protection of the principles of the business judgment rule so that if later errors or negligence of the directors are found that result in losses, the responsibility of the directors is not to the state (public). Instead, it has been transformed into (private) business responsibility based on the business judgment rule. The board of directors' responsibility can be identified by proving whether the directors' actions are honest mistakes or negliglence mistakes. If the losses caused come from actions classified as honest mistakes, the board of directors is released from their personal responsibility. However, if the loss arises from his or her actions, which are negliglence mistakes, each member of the board of directors concerned must be personally responsible.Keywords: Director; BUMN (Persero); Loss; Business Judgment Rule.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui prinsip tanggung jawab direksi BUMN (Persero) berdasarkan prinsip business judgment rule dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Data kemudian diolah dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian diketahui bahwa UUPT dan prinsip-prinsip yang dianutnya mencerminkan bahwa direksi bertanggung jawab penuh terhadap pengelolaan Perseroan dengan perlindungan prinsip business judgment rule sehingga apabila di kemudian hari ditemukan kesalahan atau kelalaian direksi yang mengakibatkan kerugian, tanggung jawab direksi bukan kepada negara (publik), melainkan telah bertransformasi menjadi tanggung jawab bisnis (privat) berdasarkan business judgment rule. Untuk mengetahui sejauh mana tanggung jawab direksi, perlu dibuktikan apakah tindakan direksi tersebut merupakan honest mistakes atau negliglence mistakes. Apabila kerugian yang ditimbulkan berasal dari tindakannya yang tergolong honest mistakes, direksi lepas dari tanggung jawabnya secara pribadi. Namun, jika kerugian tersebut berasal dari tindakannya yang merupakan negliglence mistakes, setiap anggota direksi yang bersangkutan harus bertanggung jawab secara pribadi.Kata Kunci: Direksi; BUMN; Kerugian; Business Judgment Rule.
摘要本文旨在从2007年《有限责任公司法》第40号的角度出发，根据商业判断原则，确定BUMN (Persero)公司董事的责任原则。本研究采用的研究方法是规范法研究。所使用的数据是主要和次要法律材料形式的辅助数据。然后对数据进行定性处理和分析。研究结果表明，《公司法》及其所坚持的原则体现了董事对公司经营负全部责任，在业务判断规则原则的保护下，如果后来发现董事的错误或疏忽导致损失，则董事的责任不属于国家(公众)责任。相反，它已经转化为基于业务判断规则的(私有)业务责任。可以通过证明董事的行为是诚实错误还是过失错误来确定董事会的责任。如果造成的损失是由被归类为诚实错误的行为造成的，董事会就可以免除个人责任。但是，如果损失是由于他或她的行为造成的，这是疏忽的错误，每个有关的董事会成员都必须承担个人责任。关键词:董事;BUMN (Persero);损失;商业判断规则。[摘要]artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui prinsip tanggung jawab direksi humn (Persero) berdasarkan prinsip商业判断规则dalam perspective . Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 . tentenperseran Terbatas。方法penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normnormate。Data yang digunakan adalah Data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder。数据统计与数据分析的关系。Hasil dari penelitian diketahui bahwa UUPT dan principal -prinsip yang dianutnya menerminkan bawa direksi bertanggung jawa penhadap penelolaan perseran dengan perlindungan principal商业判断规则sehinga apabila di kemudian hari ditemukan kesalahan atau kelalaian direksi yang mengakibatkan kerugian, tanggjawa direksi bukan kepaada negara(公共)，melainkan telah bertransformasi menjadi tanggung jawab bisnis(私人)berdasarkan商业判断规则。Untuk mengetahui sejauh mantanggung jawab direksi, perlu dibuktikan apakah tindakan direksi，但merupakan是诚实的错误，而不是疏忽的错误。杨德龙诚实地犯错误，杨德龙诚实地犯错误，杨德龙诚实地犯错误。Namun, jika kerugian tersebut berasal dari tindakannya yang merupakan疏忽错误，seap anggota direksi yang bersangkutan harus bertanggung jawab secara pribadi。Kata Kunci: Direksi;BUMN;Kerugian;商业判断规则。
{"title":"BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE: SEBUAH PRINSIP TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI ATAS KERUGIAN DALAM PENGELOLAAN BUMN (PERSERO)","authors":"Larassati Putri Syaflizar","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i1.45950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i1.45950","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article aims to determine the principles of responsibility for the directors of BUMN (Persero) based on the principles of business judgment rule in the perspective of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The data used are secondary data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. The data is then processed and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the research show that the Company Law and the principles it adheres to reflect that the directors are fully responsible for the management of the Company with the protection of the principles of the business judgment rule so that if later errors or negligence of the directors are found that result in losses, the responsibility of the directors is not to the state (public). Instead, it has been transformed into (private) business responsibility based on the business judgment rule. The board of directors' responsibility can be identified by proving whether the directors' actions are honest mistakes or negliglence mistakes. If the losses caused come from actions classified as honest mistakes, the board of directors is released from their personal responsibility. However, if the loss arises from his or her actions, which are negliglence mistakes, each member of the board of directors concerned must be personally responsible.Keywords: Director; BUMN (Persero); Loss; Business Judgment Rule.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui prinsip tanggung jawab direksi BUMN (Persero) berdasarkan prinsip business judgment rule dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Data kemudian diolah dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian diketahui bahwa UUPT dan prinsip-prinsip yang dianutnya mencerminkan bahwa direksi bertanggung jawab penuh terhadap pengelolaan Perseroan dengan perlindungan prinsip business judgment rule sehingga apabila di kemudian hari ditemukan kesalahan atau kelalaian direksi yang mengakibatkan kerugian, tanggung jawab direksi bukan kepada negara (publik), melainkan telah bertransformasi menjadi tanggung jawab bisnis (privat) berdasarkan business judgment rule. Untuk mengetahui sejauh mana tanggung jawab direksi, perlu dibuktikan apakah tindakan direksi tersebut merupakan honest mistakes atau negliglence mistakes. Apabila kerugian yang ditimbulkan berasal dari tindakannya yang tergolong honest mistakes, direksi lepas dari tanggung jawabnya secara pribadi. Namun, jika kerugian tersebut berasal dari tindakannya yang merupakan negliglence mistakes, setiap anggota direksi yang bersangkutan harus bertanggung jawab secara pribadi.Kata Kunci: Direksi; BUMN; Kerugian; Business Judgment Rule.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130041112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：