Jurnal Privat Law最新文献

Absract

There are still very few business actors who voluntarily want to use mediation outside the court, in the sense of taking the initiative to use mediation before submitting a lawsuit to court. However, from an efficiency perspective, using the mediation route is much more profitable than using the litigation route. Business actors also think that dispute resolution through mediation has not yet obtained a strong legal position in resolving business disputes.The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the existence of mediation outside the court as an alternative for business dispute resolution. The type of research used is normative legal research, which is research that examines laws and regulations that have a relationship with the object of research, especially regarding the principles, concepts and legal norms contained in these regulations. The research results show that the existence of mediation outside the court as an alternative to resolving business disputes is a means or place to resolve disputes, especially in the business sector, which is considered to be able to quickly uphold the value of togetherness and not deprive or suppress individual freedom. Mediation outside the court as an alternative to resolving business disputes can benefit both parties to the dispute, which means that the parties are more flexible in creating possible options that can be offered in the dispute resolution process. Although a business dispute is a form of dispute that is somewhat different from a dispute in general.

Keywords: Problematics; Mediation; Alternative  Dispute Resolution. 

Abstrak

Masih sangat sedikit pelaku usaha yang secara sukarela mau menggunakan mediasi di luar pengadilan, dalam arti berinisiatif menggunakan mediasi sebelum mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan. Padahal jika dilihat dari segi efisiensi, menggunakan jalur mediasi jauh lebih menguntungkan daripada menggunakan jalur litigasi. Pelaku usaha juga beranggapan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa melalui mediasi belum mendapatkan kedudukan hukum yang kuat dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis eksistensi mediasi di luar pengadilan sebagai aleternatif penyelesaian sengketa bisinis. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yaitu penelitian yang mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan yang mempunyai keterkaitan dengan obyek kajian penelitian khususnya mengenai asas-asas, konsep  dan norma hukum y

Abstract

This legal research identifies legal problems related to the phenomenon of copy-paste design of fashion that happens in the fashion industry through Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning the Copyright and do a comparison of the legal protection of fashion design in the United States, South Korea, and France. This legal research uses descriptive normative research methods. The result of this legal research is the protection of Copyright that the creators have is already set in the current regulations and a comparison of the legal protection of fashion design can be said to be balanced with a state of the United States and South Korea but are still lagging behind the French.

Keywords: Copyright Protection; Fashion Design; Comparative Law

Abstrak

Penulisan hukum ini mengidentifikasi problematika hukum terkait fenomena copy-paste desain fesyen yang terjadi di industri mode melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan melakukan perbandingan perlindungan hukum desain fesyen di negara Amerika Serikat, Korea Selatan, dan Perancis. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif bersifat deskriptif. Hasil dari penulisan hukum ini adalah perlindungan Hak Cipta terhadap pencipta sudah diatur dalam peraturan yang berlaku saat ini dan perbandingan perlindungan hukum atas desain fesyen dapat dikatakan seimbang dengan negara Amerikat Serikat dan Korea Selatan namun masih tertinggal dari negara Perancis.