I vart samhalle laggs stor vikt vid att vi ska kunna saga farval till vara nara och kara nar de ligger for doden. Covid-19-pandemin har inte bara orsakat ett stort antal dodsfall utan ocksa medfort hinder for anhorigas mojligheter att narvara i doendeprocessen. I en studie som genomfordes 2020 intervjuades nio personer som hade forlorat en nara anhorig under en tid av restriktioner till foljd av covid-19. Nagra hade avlidit av covid-19, nagra av andra orsaker. Syftet med denna artikel ar att synliggora normer och ideal om slutgiltiga avsked och analysera hur de intervjuade hanterar sina kanslor, bade nar de avviker fran och lever upp till dessa normer. Fysisk och emotionell narvaro vid dodsbadden utgor ett starkt ideal om hur avsked bor ga till, ett ideal som antas stodja den doende och fa de anhoriga att kanna sig delaktiga. De intervjupersoner som levt upp till dessa ideal uttrycker tacksamhet och stolthet, medan de som inte haft mojlighet att gora det uttrycker oro, skuldkanslor, hjalploshet och smarta. Ett satt att hantera dessa kanslor ar att forsoka etablera tillit bade till covid-19-restriktionernas nodvandighet och till den personal som arbetade med de avlidna.Alternate abstract:In our society, great importance is attached to being able to say goodbye to loved ones when they are dying. The Covid-19 pandemic not only causes deaths but also creates barriers to being present in the dying process. In a study conducted in 2020, nine people whose next of kin died during Covid-19 restrictions were interviewed. The aim of the article is to make visible norms and ideas about final farewells and to identify how the interviewees handle their feelings when deviating from, or fulfilling, these norms. The most prominent ideals are for relatives to be physically and emotionally present at the deathbed, both to support the dying person and to better handle the grief. The interviewees who found ways to be present express pride and gratitude, while those unable to be present express anxiety, guilt, helplessness, and pain. To deal with their emotions they try to establish trust both in the necessity of the Covid-19 restrictions and in the staff that worked with their deceased relatives.
{"title":"Avsked i coronatider","authors":"Cathrin Wasshede, Sofia Björk","doi":"10.37062/sf.58.22264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.58.22264","url":null,"abstract":"I vart samhalle laggs stor vikt vid att vi ska kunna saga farval till vara nara och kara nar de ligger for doden. Covid-19-pandemin har inte bara orsakat ett stort antal dodsfall utan ocksa medfort hinder for anhorigas mojligheter att narvara i doendeprocessen. I en studie som genomfordes 2020 intervjuades nio personer som hade forlorat en nara anhorig under en tid av restriktioner till foljd av covid-19. Nagra hade avlidit av covid-19, nagra av andra orsaker. Syftet med denna artikel ar att synliggora normer och ideal om slutgiltiga avsked och analysera hur de intervjuade hanterar sina kanslor, bade nar de avviker fran och lever upp till dessa normer. Fysisk och emotionell narvaro vid dodsbadden utgor ett starkt ideal om hur avsked bor ga till, ett ideal som antas stodja den doende och fa de anhoriga att kanna sig delaktiga. De intervjupersoner som levt upp till dessa ideal uttrycker tacksamhet och stolthet, medan de som inte haft mojlighet att gora det uttrycker oro, skuldkanslor, hjalploshet och smarta. Ett satt att hantera dessa kanslor ar att forsoka etablera tillit bade till covid-19-restriktionernas nodvandighet och till den personal som arbetade med de avlidna.Alternate abstract:In our society, great importance is attached to being able to say goodbye to loved ones when they are dying. The Covid-19 pandemic not only causes deaths but also creates barriers to being present in the dying process. In a study conducted in 2020, nine people whose next of kin died during Covid-19 restrictions were interviewed. The aim of the article is to make visible norms and ideas about final farewells and to identify how the interviewees handle their feelings when deviating from, or fulfilling, these norms. The most prominent ideals are for relatives to be physically and emotionally present at the deathbed, both to support the dying person and to better handle the grief. The interviewees who found ways to be present express pride and gratitude, while those unable to be present express anxiety, guilt, helplessness, and pain. To deal with their emotions they try to establish trust both in the necessity of the Covid-19 restrictions and in the staff that worked with their deceased relatives.","PeriodicalId":43127,"journal":{"name":"Sociologisk Forskning","volume":"58 1","pages":"153-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42223397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fighting the first wave. Why the Coronavirus was tackled so differently across the globe","authors":"Anne Kaun","doi":"10.37062/SF.58.23218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37062/SF.58.23218","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43127,"journal":{"name":"Sociologisk Forskning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43985999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
En pandemi ar en kris och som sadan en ny situation som praglas av bade vetenskapliga och samhalleliga osakerheter, i vilken vardagslivets invanda rutiner till viss del omkullkastas. Covid-19-pandemin har synliggjort redan etablerade samhallsstrukturer och ojamlikheter men ocksa forvarrat maktrelationer och utsatthet. I denna artikel introducerar vi bidragen i Sociologisk Forsknings temanummer om hur samhallet och manniskors liv har paverkats av coronakrisen och covid-19-pandemin. Vi ger aven en oversikt over nagra av de teman som belysts inom annan forskning av sociologer och samhallsvetare internationellt och i Sverige for att forsta inneborden och effekterna av covid-19-pandemin.Alternate abstract:A pandemic is a crisis and as such, in many ways, an entirely new situation. It is a situation in which there are scientific as well as societal uncertainties and where the routines of everyday life are overturned. The Covid-19 pandemic has made visible already established social structures and inequalities, but it has also exacerbated existing power relations and vulnerabilities. In this article, we introduce the contributions to the special issue of Sociologisk Forskning on how society and people's lives have been affected by the corona crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic. We also give an overview of some of the themes that are picked up by sociologists and social scientists internationally as well as nationally in Sweden, when trying to make sense of the meaning and effects of the Covid-19 pandemic.
{"title":"Sociologisk forskning om covid-19-pandemin","authors":"Shai Mulinari, Linda Soneryd, Susanna Öhman","doi":"10.37062/sf.58.23216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.58.23216","url":null,"abstract":"En pandemi ar en kris och som sadan en ny situation som praglas av bade vetenskapliga och samhalleliga osakerheter, i vilken vardagslivets invanda rutiner till viss del omkullkastas. Covid-19-pandemin har synliggjort redan etablerade samhallsstrukturer och ojamlikheter men ocksa forvarrat maktrelationer och utsatthet. I denna artikel introducerar vi bidragen i Sociologisk Forsknings temanummer om hur samhallet och manniskors liv har paverkats av coronakrisen och covid-19-pandemin. Vi ger aven en oversikt over nagra av de teman som belysts inom annan forskning av sociologer och samhallsvetare internationellt och i Sverige for att forsta inneborden och effekterna av covid-19-pandemin.Alternate abstract:A pandemic is a crisis and as such, in many ways, an entirely new situation. It is a situation in which there are scientific as well as societal uncertainties and where the routines of everyday life are overturned. The Covid-19 pandemic has made visible already established social structures and inequalities, but it has also exacerbated existing power relations and vulnerabilities. In this article, we introduce the contributions to the special issue of Sociologisk Forskning on how society and people's lives have been affected by the corona crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic. We also give an overview of some of the themes that are picked up by sociologists and social scientists internationally as well as nationally in Sweden, when trying to make sense of the meaning and effects of the Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":43127,"journal":{"name":"Sociologisk Forskning","volume":"58 1","pages":"5-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49318637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tanya Jukkala, S. Ferlander, Osman Aytar, Emily Engdahl, Antoaneta Hristova, Maria Hopstadius, Andrew Blasko, Vessela Misheva
Covid-19 började som en hälsokris och växte snabbt till en omfattande samhällskris – i det privata och offentliga livet, nationellt och internationellt, lokalt och globalt. Syftet med denna artikel är att bidra med kunskap om människors oro under covid-19-pandemins första fas i Sverige. Oro studeras utifrån sociodemografiska faktorer, socialt kapital samt människors bedömningar av nationella åtgärder och potentiella hot. Studiens teoretiska ramverk utgår från begrepp och teorier om oro och socialt kapital. Data samlades in i Sverige under april–maj 2020 med hjälp av en webbaserad enkät om människors erfarenheter av covid-19-pandemin. Genom multipel regressionsanalys och multipel korrespondensanalys fann vi att graden av oro är nära kopplad till bedömningen av nationella åtgärder som felaktiga, samt till uppfattningen att själva viruset covid-19 är det största hotet (i jämförelse med ekonomiska eller sociala konsekvenser av pandemin). Dessa faktorer var även relaterade till högre ålder, kronisk sjukdom samt lågt socialt kapital. Artikeln pekar på ett behov av mer sociologisk forskning – både kvantitativ och kvalitativ – om pandemins olika konsekvenser i vardagslivet.Alternate abstract:Covid-19 as a health crisis has affected all spheres of private and public life, both nationally and internationally, locally and globally. This article aims to contribute knowledge about people's levels of worry during the pandemic's first phase in Sweden. Worry is examined in relation to sociodemographic background, social capital, and judgements concerning potential threats and the national measures implemented. The theoretical framework utilized resides upon concepts and theories of worry and social capital. The data was collected in Sweden in April and May 2020 through an online survey of experiences of the Covid-19 pandemic. Multiple regression analysis and multiple correspondence analysis revealed that higher levels of worry were closely associated both with the judgement that the national measures implemented were not correct, and with the perception that Covid-19 as an illness comprised a greater threat than its financial and social consequences. These factors were also related to advanced age, chronic illness, and lower levels of social capital. Our findings point to the need for further sociological research – both quantitative and qualitative – concerning the pandemic's various consequences in everyday life.
{"title":"Att leva med en världsomfattande pandemi","authors":"Tanya Jukkala, S. Ferlander, Osman Aytar, Emily Engdahl, Antoaneta Hristova, Maria Hopstadius, Andrew Blasko, Vessela Misheva","doi":"10.37062/sf.58.22256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.58.22256","url":null,"abstract":"Covid-19 började som en hälsokris och växte snabbt till en omfattande samhällskris – i det privata och offentliga livet, nationellt och internationellt, lokalt och globalt. Syftet med denna artikel är att bidra med kunskap om människors oro under covid-19-pandemins första fas i Sverige. Oro studeras utifrån sociodemografiska faktorer, socialt kapital samt människors bedömningar av nationella åtgärder och potentiella hot. Studiens teoretiska ramverk utgår från begrepp och teorier om oro och socialt kapital. Data samlades in i Sverige under april–maj 2020 med hjälp av en webbaserad enkät om människors erfarenheter av covid-19-pandemin. Genom multipel regressionsanalys och multipel korrespondensanalys fann vi att graden av oro är nära kopplad till bedömningen av nationella åtgärder som felaktiga, samt till uppfattningen att själva viruset covid-19 är det största hotet (i jämförelse med ekonomiska eller sociala konsekvenser av pandemin). Dessa faktorer var även relaterade till högre ålder, kronisk sjukdom samt lågt socialt kapital. Artikeln pekar på ett behov av mer sociologisk forskning – både kvantitativ och kvalitativ – om pandemins olika konsekvenser i vardagslivet.Alternate abstract:Covid-19 as a health crisis has affected all spheres of private and public life, both nationally and internationally, locally and globally. This article aims to contribute knowledge about people's levels of worry during the pandemic's first phase in Sweden. Worry is examined in relation to sociodemographic background, social capital, and judgements concerning potential threats and the national measures implemented. The theoretical framework utilized resides upon concepts and theories of worry and social capital. The data was collected in Sweden in April and May 2020 through an online survey of experiences of the Covid-19 pandemic. Multiple regression analysis and multiple correspondence analysis revealed that higher levels of worry were closely associated both with the judgement that the national measures implemented were not correct, and with the perception that Covid-19 as an illness comprised a greater threat than its financial and social consequences. These factors were also related to advanced age, chronic illness, and lower levels of social capital. Our findings point to the need for further sociological research – both quantitative and qualitative – concerning the pandemic's various consequences in everyday life.","PeriodicalId":43127,"journal":{"name":"Sociologisk Forskning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49201456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nar covid-19-pandemin nadde Sverige mobiliserade kvinnojourerna snabbt eftersom de visste vad en nedstangning av samhallet skulle kunna betyda for kvinnor och barn som lever under hot och med vald i sina hem. Pa kort tid kom myndigheternas rekommendationer om att arbeta hemma, uppratthalla social distans och undvika resor att minska mojligheterna till rorlighet. Detta gjorde det sarskilt svart for kvinnor som levde under hot och kontroll att komma i kontakt med myndigheter och kvinnojourer. Syftet med denna artikel ar att forsta hur relationen mellan samhallet och kvinnor som ar utsatta for hot och vald i hemmet under pandemitider ser ut. Analysen utgar fran en teoretisk modell for "det immunitara livet", for att forsta forhallandet mellan individ och samhalle. Studien bestar av telefonintervjuer som genomfordes varen 2020 med personal vid fem olika kvinnojourer. Ett viktigt resultat i studien ar att misshandlade kvinnor under pandemin riskerar att berovas mojligheterna att skapa viktiga relationer med samhallet, nagot som exempelvis kvinnojourer annars mojliggor.Alternate abstract:When the Covid-19 pandemic reached Sweden, women's shelters mobilized quickly because they knew what a lockdown of public life could mean for women and children who are living with threats and violence in their homes . In a short time, recommendations by the authorities to work at home, maintain social distancing, and avoid travelling resulted in decreased possibilities for mobility . This made it particularly difficult for abused and controlled women to make contacts with the authorities and women's shelters . The purpose of this article is to understand how the relationship between abused women and the community can be understood in times of pande-mic . This is done by applying a theoretical model of "the immunitary life", to understand the relation between the individual and the community . The study consists of telephone interviews conducted in the spring of 2020 with staff at five different women's shelters . A central result in the study is that abused women, during the pandemic, are at risk of being deprived of opportu-nities to create the relationships with the community that women's shelters otherwise enables.
{"title":"Den sårbara gemenskapen","authors":"Kristofer Hansson, Charlotte Petersson","doi":"10.37062/sf.58.22106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.58.22106","url":null,"abstract":"Nar covid-19-pandemin nadde Sverige mobiliserade kvinnojourerna snabbt eftersom de visste vad en nedstangning av samhallet skulle kunna betyda for kvinnor och barn som lever under hot och med vald i sina hem. Pa kort tid kom myndigheternas rekommendationer om att arbeta hemma, uppratthalla social distans och undvika resor att minska mojligheterna till rorlighet. Detta gjorde det sarskilt svart for kvinnor som levde under hot och kontroll att komma i kontakt med myndigheter och kvinnojourer. Syftet med denna artikel ar att forsta hur relationen mellan samhallet och kvinnor som ar utsatta for hot och vald i hemmet under pandemitider ser ut. Analysen utgar fran en teoretisk modell for \"det immunitara livet\", for att forsta forhallandet mellan individ och samhalle. Studien bestar av telefonintervjuer som genomfordes varen 2020 med personal vid fem olika kvinnojourer. Ett viktigt resultat i studien ar att misshandlade kvinnor under pandemin riskerar att berovas mojligheterna att skapa viktiga relationer med samhallet, nagot som exempelvis kvinnojourer annars mojliggor.Alternate abstract:When the Covid-19 pandemic reached Sweden, women's shelters mobilized quickly because they knew what a lockdown of public life could mean for women and children who are living with threats and violence in their homes . In a short time, recommendations by the authorities to work at home, maintain social distancing, and avoid travelling resulted in decreased possibilities for mobility . This made it particularly difficult for abused and controlled women to make contacts with the authorities and women's shelters . The purpose of this article is to understand how the relationship between abused women and the community can be understood in times of pande-mic . This is done by applying a theoretical model of \"the immunitary life\", to understand the relation between the individual and the community . The study consists of telephone interviews conducted in the spring of 2020 with staff at five different women's shelters . A central result in the study is that abused women, during the pandemic, are at risk of being deprived of opportu-nities to create the relationships with the community that women's shelters otherwise enables.","PeriodicalId":43127,"journal":{"name":"Sociologisk Forskning","volume":"58 1","pages":"33-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46060144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Syftet med den har artikeln ar att studera hur manniskor skapar mening av den svenska coronastrategin samt hur de implementerar denna strategi i sina vardagsliv. Artikeln bygger pa en intervjustudie med atta personer boendes i Stockholm. Samtliga intervjuer genomfordes under pandemins initiala fas (april–maj 2020). Artikeln tar sin teoretiska utgangspunkt i ett risksociologiskt intresse for hur manniskor skapar mening kring osakerheter, har exemplifierat genom en vardag praglad av coronapandemin och den svenska strategin for att hantera denna. Resultaten visar att intervjupersonerna stodjer den svenska strategin och dess vetenskapliga grund samtidigt som de upplever en stor osakerhet infor hur strategin ska omsattas i vardagliga praktiker. Denna ambivalens kan forstas i relation till Becks risksamhalle och hans antaganden om manniskans paradoxala installning till vetenskap och riskexperter samt mot bakgrund av Tulloch och Luptons sociokulturella perspektiv pa vardag och risk.Alternate abstract:The purpose of this article is to study how people make sense of the "Swedish strategy" in dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic as well as how they implement this strategy in their everyday life. The article is based on an interview study with eight people living in Stockholm and the interviews were all performed during the initial phase of the pandemic (April–May 2020). Theoretically, this article takes its point of departure in a sociological interest for how people make sense of uncertainty, here exemplified by everyday life during the Covid-19 pandemic. The results show that the interviewees support the Swedish strategy and its scientific ground at the same time as they experience uncertainty in how this strategy should be transformed into everyday practices. This ambivalence can be understood in relation to Beck's "risk society" and his thesis about human's paradoxical approach to science and risk experts as well as in relation to Tulloch and Lupton's sociocultural perspective on risk and everyday life.
{"title":"”Bara framtiden kan visa om vi gör det här rätt”","authors":"Linda Kvarnlöf","doi":"10.37062/sf.58.22105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.58.22105","url":null,"abstract":"Syftet med den har artikeln ar att studera hur manniskor skapar mening av den svenska coronastrategin samt hur de implementerar denna strategi i sina vardagsliv. Artikeln bygger pa en intervjustudie med atta personer boendes i Stockholm. Samtliga intervjuer genomfordes under pandemins initiala fas (april–maj 2020). Artikeln tar sin teoretiska utgangspunkt i ett risksociologiskt intresse for hur manniskor skapar mening kring osakerheter, har exemplifierat genom en vardag praglad av coronapandemin och den svenska strategin for att hantera denna. Resultaten visar att intervjupersonerna stodjer den svenska strategin och dess vetenskapliga grund samtidigt som de upplever en stor osakerhet infor hur strategin ska omsattas i vardagliga praktiker. Denna ambivalens kan forstas i relation till Becks risksamhalle och hans antaganden om manniskans paradoxala installning till vetenskap och riskexperter samt mot bakgrund av Tulloch och Luptons sociokulturella perspektiv pa vardag och risk.Alternate abstract:The purpose of this article is to study how people make sense of the \"Swedish strategy\" in dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic as well as how they implement this strategy in their everyday life. The article is based on an interview study with eight people living in Stockholm and the interviews were all performed during the initial phase of the pandemic (April–May 2020). Theoretically, this article takes its point of departure in a sociological interest for how people make sense of uncertainty, here exemplified by everyday life during the Covid-19 pandemic. The results show that the interviewees support the Swedish strategy and its scientific ground at the same time as they experience uncertainty in how this strategy should be transformed into everyday practices. This ambivalence can be understood in relation to Beck's \"risk society\" and his thesis about human's paradoxical approach to science and risk experts as well as in relation to Tulloch and Lupton's sociocultural perspective on risk and everyday life.","PeriodicalId":43127,"journal":{"name":"Sociologisk Forskning","volume":"58 1","pages":"133-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42486623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joakim Kulin, Ingemar Johansson Sevä, Mikael Hjerm, Filip Fors Connolly
Syftet med denna studie ar att oka kunskapen om manniskors oro over coronapandemin i Sverige. Vi anvander enkatdata (n=3 040) for att studera 1) hur utbredd oron ar, 2) vad den mer konkret bestar i, 3) hur den varierar mellan olika demografiska och socioekonomiska grupper, 4) huruvida oron kan forklaras av faktorer som personlighet, livsaskadning, tillit och riskuppfattningar, samt 5) vilka konsekvenser oron far for manniskors sociala kontakter, livskvalitet, beteenden och asikter om samhallets atgarder for att minska smittspridningen. Resultaten visar att det finns en utbredd oro over coronapandemin i Sverige och att denna framst bottnar i en oro for den egna eller familjemedlemmars halsa. Dessutom varierar oron mellan grupper: framfor allt aldre personer men aven kvinnor och laginkomsttagare uppvisar jamforelsevis en hogre grad av oro. Det finns ett flertal faktorer som forklarar den upplevda oron, men sarskilt riskuppfattningar forklarar en stor andel av variationen mellan individer samt skillnader mellan olika grupper. De som oroar sig mer uppger ocksa att de i storre utstrackning foljer myndigheternas rekommendationer och har minskat sina sociala aktiviteter samt upplever en forsamrad livskvalitet under coronapandemin.Alternate abstract:The purpose of this study is to provide insight into individuals' degree of worrying about the corona pandemic in Sweden. Using survey data (n=3,040), we study: 1) how widespread worrying about the corona pandemic is;2) what aspects of the pandemic people worry about;3) differences in the level of worrying among demographic and socio-economic groups;4) the extent to which worries are related to factors such as personality, religiosity, political orientation, trust, and risk perceptions;and 5) consequences of worrying for social contacts and quality of life, as well as for behaviours and opinions in relation to government recommendations. Results show that worrying about the coronavirus pandemic in Sweden is widespread and primarily about one's own or relatives' health. Moreover, we find evidence of group differences, where elderly, women, and those with lower incomes articulate higher levels of worry. Several explanatory factors are linked to worrying about the pandemic. In particular, risk perceptions explain a large share of variation between individuals and groups. While those who worry more report greater compliance with authorities' recommendations and reduced social activities, they also report a lower quality of life during the pandemic.
{"title":"Oro över coronapandemin i det svenska samhället","authors":"Joakim Kulin, Ingemar Johansson Sevä, Mikael Hjerm, Filip Fors Connolly","doi":"10.37062/sf.58.22104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.58.22104","url":null,"abstract":"Syftet med denna studie ar att oka kunskapen om manniskors oro over coronapandemin i Sverige. Vi anvander enkatdata (n=3 040) for att studera 1) hur utbredd oron ar, 2) vad den mer konkret bestar i, 3) hur den varierar mellan olika demografiska och socioekonomiska grupper, 4) huruvida oron kan forklaras av faktorer som personlighet, livsaskadning, tillit och riskuppfattningar, samt 5) vilka konsekvenser oron far for manniskors sociala kontakter, livskvalitet, beteenden och asikter om samhallets atgarder for att minska smittspridningen. Resultaten visar att det finns en utbredd oro over coronapandemin i Sverige och att denna framst bottnar i en oro for den egna eller familjemedlemmars halsa. Dessutom varierar oron mellan grupper: framfor allt aldre personer men aven kvinnor och laginkomsttagare uppvisar jamforelsevis en hogre grad av oro. Det finns ett flertal faktorer som forklarar den upplevda oron, men sarskilt riskuppfattningar forklarar en stor andel av variationen mellan individer samt skillnader mellan olika grupper. De som oroar sig mer uppger ocksa att de i storre utstrackning foljer myndigheternas rekommendationer och har minskat sina sociala aktiviteter samt upplever en forsamrad livskvalitet under coronapandemin.Alternate abstract:The purpose of this study is to provide insight into individuals' degree of worrying about the corona pandemic in Sweden. Using survey data (n=3,040), we study: 1) how widespread worrying about the corona pandemic is;2) what aspects of the pandemic people worry about;3) differences in the level of worrying among demographic and socio-economic groups;4) the extent to which worries are related to factors such as personality, religiosity, political orientation, trust, and risk perceptions;and 5) consequences of worrying for social contacts and quality of life, as well as for behaviours and opinions in relation to government recommendations. Results show that worrying about the coronavirus pandemic in Sweden is widespread and primarily about one's own or relatives' health. Moreover, we find evidence of group differences, where elderly, women, and those with lower incomes articulate higher levels of worry. Several explanatory factors are linked to worrying about the pandemic. In particular, risk perceptions explain a large share of variation between individuals and groups. While those who worry more report greater compliance with authorities' recommendations and reduced social activities, they also report a lower quality of life during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":43127,"journal":{"name":"Sociologisk Forskning","volume":"58 1","pages":"77-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44079655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：