Pub Date : 2020-04-20DOI: 10.2174/2210676610999200420112129
James Collison, L. Harrison
Body dysmorphic disorder encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioural states stemming from distressing, negative evaluations of one’s appearance. Despite the seriousness of this condition, little is known about who is likely to receive a diagnosis and more importantly what the putative risk factors are. This is particularly so among adolescent samples, where the extant literature is considerably smaller. This study had two broad aims: to estimate the prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder within a young-adult population, and to examine the predictors of body image disturbance. Three-hundred and four adolescents (242 females; Mage = 17.68) completed the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire, along with measures of clinical psychopathology, self-esteem, experiences of parenting, and bullying. Body dysmorphic disorder was present in 3.9% of the sample, which is in line with previous estimates among adolescents. More interestingly, results indicated that instances of high stress, low self-esteem, and reported experiences of bullying were able to predict 48% of body image dissatisfaction. Psychological interventions should be directed towards adolescents with body image concerns, especially if they also report bullying, elevated stress, or diminished selfesteem. However, additional research is still warranted to gain an increasingly accurate understanding of the prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder and who is susceptible to developing this disorder and how we can best serve these individuals in the community.
{"title":"Prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Predictors of Body Image Disturbance in Adolescence","authors":"James Collison, L. Harrison","doi":"10.2174/2210676610999200420112129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676610999200420112129","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000Body dysmorphic disorder encompasses a range of cognitive and\u0000behavioural states stemming from distressing, negative evaluations of one’s appearance. Despite\u0000the seriousness of this condition, little is known about who is likely to receive a diagnosis\u0000and more importantly what the putative risk factors are. This is particularly so among\u0000adolescent samples, where the extant literature is considerably smaller.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000This study had two broad aims: to estimate the prevalence of body dysmorphic\u0000disorder within a young-adult population, and to examine the predictors of body image disturbance.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000Three-hundred and four adolescents (242 females; Mage = 17.68) completed the\u0000Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire and Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire,\u0000along with measures of clinical psychopathology, self-esteem, experiences of parenting, and\u0000bullying.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000 Body dysmorphic disorder was present in 3.9% of the sample, which is in line with\u0000previous estimates among adolescents. More interestingly, results indicated that instances of\u0000high stress, low self-esteem, and reported experiences of bullying were able to predict 48%\u0000of body image dissatisfaction.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000Psychological interventions should be directed towards adolescents with body\u0000image concerns, especially if they also report bullying, elevated stress, or diminished selfesteem.\u0000However, additional research is still warranted to gain an increasingly accurate understanding\u0000of the prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder and who is susceptible to developing\u0000this disorder and how we can best serve these individuals in the community.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42227928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-27DOI: 10.2174/2210676610666200327165927
Hildegunn Fandrem, B. Oppedal, T. Idsøe
This study explores the differences in the association between three different types of aggression (reactive aggression, power-related proactive aggression and affiliation- related proactive aggression) and emotional and conduct problems between early adolescents with immigrant and non-immigrant backgrounds in Norway. The sample comprised 1759 early adolescents in fifth to eighth grade (10- to 15- year-olds). The proportion of early adolescent immigrants with two foreign-born parents was 862, and 897 participants were adolescents with two Norwegian-born parents. The gender distribution was similar in the immigrant and non-immigrant samples, 48.2% boys and 49.5% girls. The mean age was 11.6 years (SD 1.25) for immigrant boys, 11.7 (SD 1.29) for non-immigrant boys, 11.6 (SD = 1.25) for immigrant girls, and 11.8 (SD = 1.27) for nonimmigrant girls. Data were collected via self-report assessments. A multigroup structural equation model revealed that the effects of reactive and proactive aggression were different for conduct and emotional problems. Only reactive and power-related proactive aggression was significantly associated with conduct problems, and effect sizes were independent of immigrant status. The effects of reactive and power-related proactive aggression on emotional problems were stronger for non-immigrant early adolescents, while the effects of affiliation-related proactive aggression were stronger for immigrant- background early adolescents. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the associations between aggression and emotional problems and the variation between immigrant and nonimmigrant early adolescents can shed light on the etiology of mental health and behavioral problems. The importance of such knowledge in designing interventions targeting aggression among early adolescents in multicultural contexts is discussed.
{"title":"Reactive and Proactive Aggression among Immigrant and Non-Immigrant Early Adolescents in Norway: The Relations to Emotional and Conduct Problems","authors":"Hildegunn Fandrem, B. Oppedal, T. Idsøe","doi":"10.2174/2210676610666200327165927","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676610666200327165927","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000This study explores the differences in the association between three\u0000different types of aggression (reactive aggression, power-related proactive aggression and affiliation-\u0000related proactive aggression) and emotional and conduct problems between early\u0000adolescents with immigrant and non-immigrant backgrounds in Norway.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000The sample comprised 1759 early adolescents in fifth to eighth grade (10- to 15-\u0000year-olds). The proportion of early adolescent immigrants with two foreign-born parents was\u0000862, and 897 participants were adolescents with two Norwegian-born parents. The gender\u0000distribution was similar in the immigrant and non-immigrant samples, 48.2% boys and\u000049.5% girls. The mean age was 11.6 years (SD 1.25) for immigrant boys, 11.7 (SD 1.29) for\u0000non-immigrant boys, 11.6 (SD = 1.25) for immigrant girls, and 11.8 (SD = 1.27) for nonimmigrant\u0000girls. Data were collected via self-report assessments.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000A multigroup structural equation model revealed that the effects of reactive and\u0000proactive aggression were different for conduct and emotional problems. Only reactive and\u0000power-related proactive aggression was significantly associated with conduct problems, and\u0000effect sizes were independent of immigrant status. The effects of reactive and power-related\u0000proactive aggression on emotional problems were stronger for non-immigrant early adolescents,\u0000while the effects of affiliation-related proactive aggression were stronger for immigrant-\u0000background early adolescents.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000 A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the associations between\u0000aggression and emotional problems and the variation between immigrant and nonimmigrant\u0000early adolescents can shed light on the etiology of mental health and behavioral\u0000problems. The importance of such knowledge in designing interventions targeting aggression\u0000among early adolescents in multicultural contexts is discussed.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42627786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-27DOI: 10.2174/2210676610666200327164953
A. Streeck-Fischer, Charline Logé, S. Salzer
Studies have shown the practicality of diagnosing borderline personality disorder (BPD) in children from the age of 12 years (cf. ICD-11, DSM-5). Research in the psychodynamic therapy of adolescents with BPD has been rare to date, however, there do exist some studies on the efficacy and effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy in adults with borderline personality disorder. We adapted the psychoanalytic-interactional method (PiM), originally developed in the treatment of severely disturbed adults, to the conditions of adolescents diagnosed with borderline personality disorder or structural deficits. Randomized controlled trial in an inpatient setting (Salzer et al., 2013; Salzer et al., 2014) showed that PIM is efficacious for adolescents with BPD symptoms. We describe the approach to treatment in detail. The results of the therapeutic study and the short case vignette show that PiM is a useful method in both inpatient and outpatient treatment and meets the specific requirements of adolescent treatment.
研究表明,诊断12岁以下儿童的边缘性人格障碍(BPD)是实用的(参见ICD-11,DSM-5)。迄今为止,对青少年BPD的心理动力学治疗的研究很少,但也有一些关于心理动力学治疗边缘型人格障碍的疗效和有效性的研究。我们将精神分析互动方法(PiM)应用于被诊断为边缘型人格障碍或结构缺陷的青少年,该方法最初是为治疗严重精神障碍的成年人而开发的。一项患者随机对照试验(Salzer等人,2013;Salzer et al.,2014)表明PIM对有BPD症状的青少年有效。我们详细描述了治疗方法。治疗研究的结果和简短的案例表明,PiM在住院和门诊治疗中都是有效的方法,符合青少年治疗的具体要求。
{"title":"The Psychoanalytic-Interactional Method (PiM) for Adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder","authors":"A. Streeck-Fischer, Charline Logé, S. Salzer","doi":"10.2174/2210676610666200327164953","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210676610666200327164953","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000\u0000Studies have shown the practicality of diagnosing borderline personality\u0000disorder (BPD) in children from the age of 12 years (cf. ICD-11, DSM-5). Research\u0000in the psychodynamic therapy of adolescents with BPD has been rare to date, however, there\u0000do exist some studies on the efficacy and effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy in adults\u0000with borderline personality disorder.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000We adapted the psychoanalytic-interactional method (PiM), originally developed\u0000in the treatment of severely disturbed adults, to the conditions of adolescents diagnosed with\u0000borderline personality disorder or structural deficits. Randomized controlled trial in an inpatient\u0000setting (Salzer et al., 2013; Salzer et al., 2014) showed that PIM is efficacious for adolescents\u0000with BPD symptoms. We describe the approach to treatment in detail.\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000 The results of the therapeutic study and the short case vignette show that PiM is a\u0000useful method in both inpatient and outpatient treatment and meets the specific requirements\u0000of adolescent treatment.\u0000","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44485287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}