{"title":"Asian Americans and the Intelligence War","authors":"K. Peiss","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"195 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44211397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Black Freedom, Indigenous Sovereignty, and Reconstruction","authors":"Kyle T. Mays","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"177 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43615575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In The World Colonization Made: The Racial Geography of Early American Empire, Brandon Mills skillfully explores early-nineteenth-century American discourses and U.S. policies addressing the “Negro Problem” and the “Indian Question,” arguing that “white Americans initially created the ideology of colonization... to manage the domestic racial threats posed by slavery and settlement” (p. 3). What makes Mills’s study unique is his insistence that the fate of Indigenous and Black peoples in the early American republic unfolded in the context of colonization debates in which the campaign for colonizing African Americans outside the republic predated Indian removal as a federal policy. He deftly analyzes a range of printed primary sources to reveal why federal politicians rejected Indigenous peoples as potential settlers in the Western “frontier” and simultaneously refused to monetarily support Black colonization abroad. As he notes, this was not a repudiation of colonization, but rather a reorientation of U.S. imperial strategies. Mills demonstrates that the organizing logic of colonization later informed U.S. global expansion and white Americans’ “racialized worldview” (p. 3). Mills traces the genesis of the American ideology of colonization from the Jefferson administration to the Civil War. Beginning with Jefferson’s seminal writings about the racial makeup of the United States, Mills takes the reader on a journey of letters and political debates where prominent white elites, white politicians, white and Black abolitionists, and subordinated Indigenous nations and African Americans grappled with the meaning of the racial republic that was the “Empire of Liberty.” Mills exposes the myriad ways that these groups framed the debate around a series of questions: Who is an American? Who has rights to citizenship as defined by the white settler empire? Can non-whites be assimilated into the body politic of the American settler state? Colonization emerged as a potential panacea for what white Americans con-
{"title":"Colonization and U.S. Imperial Racial Republicanism","authors":"J. Jones","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0015","url":null,"abstract":"In The World Colonization Made: The Racial Geography of Early American Empire, Brandon Mills skillfully explores early-nineteenth-century American discourses and U.S. policies addressing the “Negro Problem” and the “Indian Question,” arguing that “white Americans initially created the ideology of colonization... to manage the domestic racial threats posed by slavery and settlement” (p. 3). What makes Mills’s study unique is his insistence that the fate of Indigenous and Black peoples in the early American republic unfolded in the context of colonization debates in which the campaign for colonizing African Americans outside the republic predated Indian removal as a federal policy. He deftly analyzes a range of printed primary sources to reveal why federal politicians rejected Indigenous peoples as potential settlers in the Western “frontier” and simultaneously refused to monetarily support Black colonization abroad. As he notes, this was not a repudiation of colonization, but rather a reorientation of U.S. imperial strategies. Mills demonstrates that the organizing logic of colonization later informed U.S. global expansion and white Americans’ “racialized worldview” (p. 3). Mills traces the genesis of the American ideology of colonization from the Jefferson administration to the Civil War. Beginning with Jefferson’s seminal writings about the racial makeup of the United States, Mills takes the reader on a journey of letters and political debates where prominent white elites, white politicians, white and Black abolitionists, and subordinated Indigenous nations and African Americans grappled with the meaning of the racial republic that was the “Empire of Liberty.” Mills exposes the myriad ways that these groups framed the debate around a series of questions: Who is an American? Who has rights to citizenship as defined by the white settler empire? Can non-whites be assimilated into the body politic of the American settler state? Colonization emerged as a potential panacea for what white Americans con-","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"136 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44583251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"\"Community of Thieves\": Blood, Violence, and Land in Narratives of the American West","authors":"E. Rafferty","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"148 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49582502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, Senator Joe McCarthy, and attorney Roy Cohn were among the most villainous figures in mid-century U.S. politics. In addition to intimidating dissenters and promoting traditional racial and gender hierarchies, the three men frequently smeared liberals and radicals as dangerous “sexual perverts.” Yet Christopher Elias argues that they were finally undermined by the same forces they helped unleash—“to varying degrees, each man was ultimately hoist with his own petard,” he says (p. 17). These men who devoted their careers to constructing what Elias calls “surveillance state masculinity” eventually had their own manhood called into question. Elias might not persuade the reader that these men suffered much for their ruthless queering of their opponents, but in the process of analyzing their performative masculinity, he reveals some fascinating connections between extremist anti-communism, changing norms in gender and sexuality, and the culture of gossip. Elias also shows how these three men constructed identities and invented techniques that still haunt U.S. politics today. Elias’s analysis of his main characters turns on the intersection of three historical developments: the expansion of the national surveillance state; the revolution in gender and sexual norms; and the emergence of a culture of gossip in American media, politics, and society. The first two themes—the roles that Hoover, McCarthy, and Cohn played in creating the surveillance state and their conscious construction of their own masculine identities—have received attention from scholars. Ellen Schrecker’s Many Are the Crimes (1998), Curt Gentry’s J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets (1991), Athan Theoharis and John Stuart Cox’s The Boss (1988), Robert Griffith’s The Politics of Fear (1970), and David Oshinsky’s A Conspiracy So Immense (1983), among many other books, have described how Hoover and McCarthy gained and retained power by weaponizing American fears of communist infiltration. Claire Bond Potter’s War on Crime (1998) and Richard Gid Powers’s G-Men (1983) traced
联邦调查局局长J·埃德加·胡佛、参议员乔·麦卡锡和律师罗伊·科恩是本世纪中叶美国政治中最邪恶的人物。除了恐吓持不同政见者和宣扬传统的种族和性别等级制度外，这三人还经常抹黑自由主义者和激进分子是危险的“性变态”。然而，克里斯托弗·埃利亚斯认为，他们最终被他们帮助释放的同一股力量所削弱——“在不同程度上，每个人最终都是被自己的手掌吊起来的，”他说（第17页）。这些人的职业生涯致力于构建埃利亚斯所说的“监控国家的男子气概”，最终他们自己的男子气概受到了质疑。埃利亚斯可能无法说服读者，这些人因为无情地折磨对手而遭受了太多痛苦，但在分析他们表演性的男子气概的过程中，他揭示了极端主义反共、不断变化的性别和性规范以及八卦文化之间的一些迷人联系。埃利亚斯还展示了这三个人是如何构建身份和发明技术的，这些技术至今仍困扰着美国政治。埃利亚斯对其主要人物的分析转向了三个历史发展的交叉点：国家监控国家的扩张；性别和性规范的革命；以及八卦文化在美国媒体、政治和社会中的出现。前两个主题——胡佛、麦卡锡和科恩在创造监视状态中所扮演的角色，以及他们对自己男性身份的自觉建构——受到了学者们的关注。Ellen Schrecker的《许多都是罪行》（1998）、Curt Gentry的J.Edgar Hoover的《人与秘密》（1991）、Athan Theoharis和John Stuart Cox的《老板》（1988）、Robert Griffith的《恐惧的政治》（1970）和David Oshinsky的《如此巨大的阴谋》（1983），描述了胡佛和麦卡锡如何通过将美国对共产主义渗透的恐惧武器化来获得和保留权力。克莱尔·邦德·波特的《打击犯罪的战争》（1998年）和理查德·吉德·鲍尔斯的《G-Men》（1983年）
{"title":"Masculine Insecurity State","authors":"K. Olmsted","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0022","url":null,"abstract":"FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, Senator Joe McCarthy, and attorney Roy Cohn were among the most villainous figures in mid-century U.S. politics. In addition to intimidating dissenters and promoting traditional racial and gender hierarchies, the three men frequently smeared liberals and radicals as dangerous “sexual perverts.” Yet Christopher Elias argues that they were finally undermined by the same forces they helped unleash—“to varying degrees, each man was ultimately hoist with his own petard,” he says (p. 17). These men who devoted their careers to constructing what Elias calls “surveillance state masculinity” eventually had their own manhood called into question. Elias might not persuade the reader that these men suffered much for their ruthless queering of their opponents, but in the process of analyzing their performative masculinity, he reveals some fascinating connections between extremist anti-communism, changing norms in gender and sexuality, and the culture of gossip. Elias also shows how these three men constructed identities and invented techniques that still haunt U.S. politics today. Elias’s analysis of his main characters turns on the intersection of three historical developments: the expansion of the national surveillance state; the revolution in gender and sexual norms; and the emergence of a culture of gossip in American media, politics, and society. The first two themes—the roles that Hoover, McCarthy, and Cohn played in creating the surveillance state and their conscious construction of their own masculine identities—have received attention from scholars. Ellen Schrecker’s Many Are the Crimes (1998), Curt Gentry’s J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets (1991), Athan Theoharis and John Stuart Cox’s The Boss (1988), Robert Griffith’s The Politics of Fear (1970), and David Oshinsky’s A Conspiracy So Immense (1983), among many other books, have described how Hoover and McCarthy gained and retained power by weaponizing American fears of communist infiltration. Claire Bond Potter’s War on Crime (1998) and Richard Gid Powers’s G-Men (1983) traced","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"201 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45600514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Gideon's Cold War Origins","authors":"A. Hughett","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"102 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49444007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Among the greatest challenges facing the historian of modern warfare is capturing war’s extraordinary scale without losing sight of its human dimension. Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union that began in June 1941, was one of the greatest battles in history, engaging millions of combatants, raging across hundreds of miles, lasting six months. Behind these figures were the broken lives of individual soldiers and civilians who were caught in the battle’s murderous machinery. Barbarossa set in motion four years of vicious combat in which both sides were profligate with the lives of their troops and savage in their treatment of the enemy. To cite just one statistic: of the 5.7 million Soviet soldiers captured by the Germans, some 3.3 million perished from hunger, disease, or mistreatment. Those who managed to survive captivity were often punished after their liberation, since the Soviet authorities regarded being captured as a form of treason. Jonathan Dimbleby’s book does justice to both the battle’s scale and its impact on individuals’ lives. Barbarossa’s is, as he shows in convincing detail, an extraordinary story that begins when 3.3 million German troops attacked along an 1800-kilometer front, stretching from the Baltic to the Balkans. During the first weeks of the campaign, things went just as the invaders hoped: badly led, equipped with inferior weapons, and pursuing poorly executed tactics, the Soviets lost massive amounts of men, weapons, and aircraft. By the first week of July, well-informed German commanders predicted a rapid and relatively easy victory. But then the momentum of the German advance began to slow. By October, the Soviet resistance had stiffened, just as the first signs of winter appeared. In early December, the Russians launched a broad counter-offensive that did not destroy the Wehrmacht but did force it to assume defensive positions. This move, in effect, brought Barbarossa to an end. Neither Moscow nor St.Petersburg was captured, the regime remained intact, and the quality of the Red Army’s leadership and weaponry dramatically improved. In addition to providing a clear account of the ebb and flow of military opera-
{"title":"Hitler's Greatest Gamble","authors":"J. Sheehan","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0008","url":null,"abstract":"Among the greatest challenges facing the historian of modern warfare is capturing war’s extraordinary scale without losing sight of its human dimension. Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union that began in June 1941, was one of the greatest battles in history, engaging millions of combatants, raging across hundreds of miles, lasting six months. Behind these figures were the broken lives of individual soldiers and civilians who were caught in the battle’s murderous machinery. Barbarossa set in motion four years of vicious combat in which both sides were profligate with the lives of their troops and savage in their treatment of the enemy. To cite just one statistic: of the 5.7 million Soviet soldiers captured by the Germans, some 3.3 million perished from hunger, disease, or mistreatment. Those who managed to survive captivity were often punished after their liberation, since the Soviet authorities regarded being captured as a form of treason. Jonathan Dimbleby’s book does justice to both the battle’s scale and its impact on individuals’ lives. Barbarossa’s is, as he shows in convincing detail, an extraordinary story that begins when 3.3 million German troops attacked along an 1800-kilometer front, stretching from the Baltic to the Balkans. During the first weeks of the campaign, things went just as the invaders hoped: badly led, equipped with inferior weapons, and pursuing poorly executed tactics, the Soviets lost massive amounts of men, weapons, and aircraft. By the first week of July, well-informed German commanders predicted a rapid and relatively easy victory. But then the momentum of the German advance began to slow. By October, the Soviet resistance had stiffened, just as the first signs of winter appeared. In early December, the Russians launched a broad counter-offensive that did not destroy the Wehrmacht but did force it to assume defensive positions. This move, in effect, brought Barbarossa to an end. Neither Moscow nor St.Petersburg was captured, the regime remained intact, and the quality of the Red Army’s leadership and weaponry dramatically improved. In addition to providing a clear account of the ebb and flow of military opera-","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"75 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48276387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thirty years ago, historian Drew Gilpin Faust transformed Civil War history by using the experiences of women to answer one of the field’s most central questions. In an essay in the Journal of American History and then a few years later in her award-winning Mothers of Invention (1996), Faust connected the declining morale of slaveholding women to the ultimate defeat of the Confederate army. The Confederacy lost, she explained, because the white women who put themselves on “Altars of Sacrifice” (1990) to sustain it ultimately withdrew their support. Despite longstanding assumptions to the contrary, men, machinery, and troop movements could not explain everything. Throughout the 1990s, other scholars similarly argued that women were more than inconsequential spectators to or victims of the war. Catherine Clinton, Tera W. Hunter, Elizabeth D. Leonard, George C. Rable, Leslie A. Schwalm, Nina Silber, and LeeAnn Whites, to name a few, demonstrated that women indelibly altered the course of the Civil War. In addition to expanding the questions and shape of Civil War historiography, these scholars took direct aim at the terrain occupied by traditional military historians. They showed how wives shaped the tactical decisions of their officer husbands; how Black women’s actions dictated the course of emancipation; how women of all regions and backgrounds fueled supply lines and recruitment efforts; and how officers chose strategies and tactics that accounted for the white and Black civilians they knew they would encounter. The field flourished and the scholarship that followed “[bridged] the artificial gap separating military history from women and gender studies—a gap that did not exist for the participants.”1 A Campaign of Giants: The Battle for Petersburg, Volume One, From the Crossing of the James to the Crater, the first volume of A. Wilson Greene’s proposed trilogy, boldly claims it will ultimately create the most comprehensive exploration of the campaign to date. However, a generation after these award-winning studies of gender, women, and war, the 726 page-volume feels as incomplete as it is long. Greene’s exclusion of white and Black women from his analysis
{"title":"Beyond the Outskirts of Civil War History","authors":"L. Frank","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0006","url":null,"abstract":"Thirty years ago, historian Drew Gilpin Faust transformed Civil War history by using the experiences of women to answer one of the field’s most central questions. In an essay in the Journal of American History and then a few years later in her award-winning Mothers of Invention (1996), Faust connected the declining morale of slaveholding women to the ultimate defeat of the Confederate army. The Confederacy lost, she explained, because the white women who put themselves on “Altars of Sacrifice” (1990) to sustain it ultimately withdrew their support. Despite longstanding assumptions to the contrary, men, machinery, and troop movements could not explain everything. Throughout the 1990s, other scholars similarly argued that women were more than inconsequential spectators to or victims of the war. Catherine Clinton, Tera W. Hunter, Elizabeth D. Leonard, George C. Rable, Leslie A. Schwalm, Nina Silber, and LeeAnn Whites, to name a few, demonstrated that women indelibly altered the course of the Civil War. In addition to expanding the questions and shape of Civil War historiography, these scholars took direct aim at the terrain occupied by traditional military historians. They showed how wives shaped the tactical decisions of their officer husbands; how Black women’s actions dictated the course of emancipation; how women of all regions and backgrounds fueled supply lines and recruitment efforts; and how officers chose strategies and tactics that accounted for the white and Black civilians they knew they would encounter. The field flourished and the scholarship that followed “[bridged] the artificial gap separating military history from women and gender studies—a gap that did not exist for the participants.”1 A Campaign of Giants: The Battle for Petersburg, Volume One, From the Crossing of the James to the Crater, the first volume of A. Wilson Greene’s proposed trilogy, boldly claims it will ultimately create the most comprehensive exploration of the campaign to date. However, a generation after these award-winning studies of gender, women, and war, the 726 page-volume feels as incomplete as it is long. Greene’s exclusion of white and Black women from his analysis","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"48 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42910878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Human Events and Whited Sepulchres","authors":"V. Scharff","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"110 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47839469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Slavery and the Enslaved at the Frontiers of Freedom","authors":"J. Rothman","doi":"10.1353/rah.2022.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2022.0005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"50 1","pages":"40 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49436196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：