Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-76-80
Y. Rybakov
The special representation of quantum mechanics suggested by Wiener is studied, the wave function being considered as Gaussian random variable, i. e. the vector of the random Hilbert space. The connection between this representation and the well-known Einstein’s program aiming at creating the consistent field formulation of particle physics is revealed, with particles being represented as solitons, clots of some material field satisfying nonlinear equations.
{"title":"RANDOM HILBERT SPACE AND WIENER’S INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS","authors":"Y. Rybakov","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-76-80","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-76-80","url":null,"abstract":"The special representation of quantum mechanics suggested by Wiener is studied, the wave function being considered as Gaussian random variable, i. e. the vector of the random Hilbert space. The connection between this representation and the well-known Einstein’s program aiming at creating the consistent field formulation of particle physics is revealed, with particles being represented as solitons, clots of some material field satisfying nonlinear equations.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72620621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-142-153
A. Burov, L. A. Burov, I. A. Rybakova
The creators of physics sought to construct it like Euclidean geometry, where a few mathematically formulated axioms, laws, opens the possibility of an unlimited number of theorems, conclusions concerning specific situations, verified by special observations, experiments. The idea of this program of cognition, not necessarily quite consciously, arose from what may be called Biblical Platonism, a synthesis of the Pythagorean-Platonism of antiquity and Biblical cosmism. Explicitly or not, this program implied the following properties of the laws, the atemporal logical structure of the universe: sufficient mathematical simplicity, universality, absolute precision, completeness and compatibility with life and thought, and anthropicity. The subsequent development of physics has demonstrated both a truly cosmic success and certain problems and limits of this paradigm. The former manifested in the universality of coverage and the fantastic accuracy of the mathematically elegant laws of matter discovered. The latter were related to the dualism of mind and matter, the enigma of the emergence and development of life, the discovery of the limits to the applicability of theories, and the forced rejection of some self-evident truths that previously seemed immutable. The article outlines approaches to the solution of these problems, which seem to be compatible with biblical Platonism.
{"title":"METAPHYSICAL STATUS OF PHYSICAL LAWS","authors":"A. Burov, L. A. Burov, I. A. Rybakova","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-142-153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-142-153","url":null,"abstract":"The creators of physics sought to construct it like Euclidean geometry, where a few mathematically formulated axioms, laws, opens the possibility of an unlimited number of theorems, conclusions concerning specific situations, verified by special observations, experiments. The idea of this program of cognition, not necessarily quite consciously, arose from what may be called Biblical Platonism, a synthesis of the Pythagorean-Platonism of antiquity and Biblical cosmism. Explicitly or not, this program implied the following properties of the laws, the atemporal logical structure of the universe: sufficient mathematical simplicity, universality, absolute precision, completeness and compatibility with life and thought, and anthropicity. The subsequent development of physics has demonstrated both a truly cosmic success and certain problems and limits of this paradigm. The former manifested in the universality of coverage and the fantastic accuracy of the mathematically elegant laws of matter discovered. The latter were related to the dualism of mind and matter, the enigma of the emergence and development of life, the discovery of the limits to the applicability of theories, and the forced rejection of some self-evident truths that previously seemed immutable. The article outlines approaches to the solution of these problems, which seem to be compatible with biblical Platonism.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83274497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What are Sex and Gender and what Do We Want them to Be?","authors":"None Ásta","doi":"10.5334/met.118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/met.118","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135609676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-103-115
R. Nugaev
It is contended that one of the promising directions for solving the problem of incommensurability of paradigms, coined by T. Kuhn and P. Feyerabend, can be associated with the trend of advancement of neo-Kantian epistemology, presented by the writings of Ernst Cassirer. According to Cassirer, the statements fixing connections and relationships between mathematical ideal constructs form a “neutral language” that can serve as a firm ground for comparing the “old” and “new” paradigms. A case study of the genesis and functioning of a neutral mathematical language related to the Maxwellian synthesis of optics and electromagnetism isprovided. It is elicited that its basis is constituted by the mathematical language of continuum mechanics. The main function of the neutral language was to project the consequences of all the unified theories onto the mathematical model, “rewrite” all known laws in this mathematical language, compare their conclusions with each other to eliminate contradictions and generalize the stuff in a self-consistent system of equations.
{"title":"MAXWELL’S UNIFICATION OF OPTICS AND ELECTROMAGNETISM AND THE INCOMMENSURABILITY TENET","authors":"R. Nugaev","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-103-115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-103-115","url":null,"abstract":"It is contended that one of the promising directions for solving the problem of incommensurability of paradigms, coined by T. Kuhn and P. Feyerabend, can be associated with the trend of advancement of neo-Kantian epistemology, presented by the writings of Ernst Cassirer. According to Cassirer, the statements fixing connections and relationships between mathematical ideal constructs form a “neutral language” that can serve as a firm ground for comparing the “old” and “new” paradigms. A case study of the genesis and functioning of a neutral mathematical language related to the Maxwellian synthesis of optics and electromagnetism isprovided. It is elicited that its basis is constituted by the mathematical language of continuum mechanics. The main function of the neutral language was to project the consequences of all the unified theories onto the mathematical model, “rewrite” all known laws in this mathematical language, compare their conclusions with each other to eliminate contradictions and generalize the stuff in a self-consistent system of equations.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90992000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-154-160
I. A. Rybakova
This article is devoted to a brief analysis of the views of the German physicist in their comparison with the concept of the metaphysical foundations of the universe of modern physicists Alexei Vladimirovich and Lev Alekseevich Burov. The object of the study is the main philosophical work of Heisenberg - the treatise “The Order of Reality” - and the work of the Drillers called “Metaphysical Status of physical Laws”. The metaphysical concepts of the multimodular reality of the mentioned authors are compared, and a brief historical basis for the emergence of these concepts is given. The substantiation of the importance of philosophical research in the field of physics and mathematics, and quantum physics is given - in particular. The necessity of further research of the issue is postulated considering the latest concepts in natural science within the framework of binary geometrophysics of Yu.S. Vladimirov. In conclusion, the importance of the modal (or multimodular) nature of reality is argued for the construction of a new, comprehensive picture of the world, within which it would be possible, finally, to understand the essence of quantum processes that determine reality, and to reach a fundamentally new level of philosophy of natural science.
{"title":"CORRESPONDENCE OF HEISENBERG’S VIEWS WITH THE MULTIMODULAR CONCEPT OF A.V. AND L.A. BUROV","authors":"I. A. Rybakova","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-154-160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-154-160","url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to a brief analysis of the views of the German physicist in their comparison with the concept of the metaphysical foundations of the universe of modern physicists Alexei Vladimirovich and Lev Alekseevich Burov. The object of the study is the main philosophical work of Heisenberg - the treatise “The Order of Reality” - and the work of the Drillers called “Metaphysical Status of physical Laws”. The metaphysical concepts of the multimodular reality of the mentioned authors are compared, and a brief historical basis for the emergence of these concepts is given. The substantiation of the importance of philosophical research in the field of physics and mathematics, and quantum physics is given - in particular. The necessity of further research of the issue is postulated considering the latest concepts in natural science within the framework of binary geometrophysics of Yu.S. Vladimirov. In conclusion, the importance of the modal (or multimodular) nature of reality is argued for the construction of a new, comprehensive picture of the world, within which it would be possible, finally, to understand the essence of quantum processes that determine reality, and to reach a fundamentally new level of philosophy of natural science.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91268811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Aristotle on Artifactual Substances","authors":"Phil Corkum","doi":"10.5334/met.123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/met.123","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73905072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-23-37
V. Aristov
Questions of a general philosophical, metaphysical nature about the properties of space and time inevitably intersect with their physical interpretation, including in hypothetical experiments. In this paper, relational ideas about the limiting philosophical categories are studied, which make it possible to concretize the ways of specifying space and time. This approach is compared with Leibniz’s concept. The development of relational theoretical propositions leads to predictions of new effects and a discussion of their possible experimental verifications. It is concluded that the foundations and future limits of the theory can, in a certain sense, be reconciled.
{"title":"RELATIONAL SPACE AND TIME: METAPHYSICAL FOUNDATIONS AND POSSIBILITIES OF EXPERIMENTS","authors":"V. Aristov","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-23-37","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-23-37","url":null,"abstract":"Questions of a general philosophical, metaphysical nature about the properties of space and time inevitably intersect with their physical interpretation, including in hypothetical experiments. In this paper, relational ideas about the limiting philosophical categories are studied, which make it possible to concretize the ways of specifying space and time. This approach is compared with Leibniz’s concept. The development of relational theoretical propositions leads to predictions of new effects and a discussion of their possible experimental verifications. It is concluded that the foundations and future limits of the theory can, in a certain sense, be reconciled.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88805991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Making Things Collectively","authors":"Chaeyoung Paek","doi":"10.5334/met.91","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5334/met.91","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82666584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126
A. M. Krivchikov
The article explores 2 opposite approaches to the authorship of the special theory of relativity. The first assumes that Albert Einstein is the only scientist whose contribution to the development of science allowed the creation of SRT. The second approach proclaims that the theory of relativity is the product of the collective activity of many scientists who have been working on its creation for decades.
{"title":"ISSUES OF SCIENTIFIC PRIORITY AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF TWO PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE","authors":"A. M. Krivchikov","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126","url":null,"abstract":"The article explores 2 opposite approaches to the authorship of the special theory of relativity. The first assumes that Albert Einstein is the only scientist whose contribution to the development of science allowed the creation of SRT. The second approach proclaims that the theory of relativity is the product of the collective activity of many scientists who have been working on its creation for decades.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83862360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：