Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new possibilities to augment human decision-making under radical uncertainty. This viewpoint commentary explores how AI can relax limits of bounded rationality. It offers a framework for analyzing how AI can support human decision-makers confronted with deep uncertainty by bolstering key decision-making sub-processes. Specifically, AI can help set agendas by scanning environments, formulate problems by providing contextual insights, identify creative alternatives through combinatorial abilities, select options by modelling scenarios and enable rapid experimentation cycles. Connecting the role of AI with the contributions in this special issue, this viewpoint commentary concludes by outlining directions for future research regarding the function of AI and augmented human intelligence in decision-making under conditions of radical uncertainty.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and radical uncertainty","authors":"Ann-Kristin Weiser, Georg von Krogh","doi":"10.1111/emre.12630","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12630","url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new possibilities to augment human decision-making under radical uncertainty. This viewpoint commentary explores how AI can relax limits of bounded rationality. It offers a framework for analyzing how AI can support human decision-makers confronted with deep uncertainty by bolstering key decision-making sub-processes. Specifically, AI can help set agendas by scanning environments, formulate problems by providing contextual insights, identify creative alternatives through combinatorial abilities, select options by modelling scenarios and enable rapid experimentation cycles. Connecting the role of AI with the contributions in this special issue, this viewpoint commentary concludes by outlining directions for future research regarding the function of AI and augmented human intelligence in decision-making under conditions of radical uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":47372,"journal":{"name":"European Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138687333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The quest for non‐Bayesian decision‐making heuristics: Towards a logic of imagination","authors":"Armand Hatchuel","doi":"10.1111/emre.12625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12625","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47372,"journal":{"name":"European Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138599338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The European Management Review is pleased to host this Dialogue on an important theme, gaining increasing attention in the academic debate on both sides of the Atlantic, as well as in the policy initiatives of European institutions. The theme is the role of “purposes” in driving the conduct of enterprises. This Dialogue develops and articulates the argument that a debate on purposes not considering the role of law is destined to remain weak in consequences and imprecise in conceptualization.