Pub Date : 2022-08-26DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221116443
Background During its history, JLSP has inaugurated three Awards, all presented biennially at International Conferences on Language & Social Psychology (ICLASP) and the 2022 Awards (and other honors) are announced below. The original announcements and commendations were presented via ZOOM at the ICLASP17 Conference Business Meeting, Hong Kong, June 25, 2022. We take this opportunity here of celebrating and congratulating the Awardees’ achievements. It took over 30 years before we had the first one announced in 2008 at ICLASP11. This was the Best Paper Award for the most outstanding article in the prior two years and this practice has continued at ICLASPs ever since. Another award was inaugurated in 2020, and it was called the “Jake Harwood JLSP Outstanding Book Award” in recognition of the incumbent’s 20 years of stellar service and utter commitment to the critical appreciation of books in our sub-discipline and beyond, coaxing excellent reviews from scholars across disciplinary backgrounds. For both Awards, I am indebted to the International Association of Language and Social Psychology (IALSP) and its Presidents for establishing subcommittees – and my sincere gratitude and indebtedness to its members and Chairs – who generously expend their time, energies and expertise in reviewing candidates for these Awards. A special thanks on this occasion to Maggie Pitts who energetically chaired BOTH of these Award subcommittees and vigorously presented them at ICLASP17 with flair. Now thanks to a suggestion from a wise sage who, years ago, said, “It’s a pity there’s no Award around for outstanding Reviewer, given the toil and investment that goes into them!” Indeed, at that time, I was not aware of language or communication journals making such Awards and so, the Outstanding JLSP Reviewer Award – was inaugurated in 2014.
{"title":"Announcements: JLSP Awards, Other Honors, and Next ICLASP18 Conference in Tallinn","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221116443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221116443","url":null,"abstract":"Background During its history, JLSP has inaugurated three Awards, all presented biennially at International Conferences on Language & Social Psychology (ICLASP) and the 2022 Awards (and other honors) are announced below. The original announcements and commendations were presented via ZOOM at the ICLASP17 Conference Business Meeting, Hong Kong, June 25, 2022. We take this opportunity here of celebrating and congratulating the Awardees’ achievements. It took over 30 years before we had the first one announced in 2008 at ICLASP11. This was the Best Paper Award for the most outstanding article in the prior two years and this practice has continued at ICLASPs ever since. Another award was inaugurated in 2020, and it was called the “Jake Harwood JLSP Outstanding Book Award” in recognition of the incumbent’s 20 years of stellar service and utter commitment to the critical appreciation of books in our sub-discipline and beyond, coaxing excellent reviews from scholars across disciplinary backgrounds. For both Awards, I am indebted to the International Association of Language and Social Psychology (IALSP) and its Presidents for establishing subcommittees – and my sincere gratitude and indebtedness to its members and Chairs – who generously expend their time, energies and expertise in reviewing candidates for these Awards. A special thanks on this occasion to Maggie Pitts who energetically chaired BOTH of these Award subcommittees and vigorously presented them at ICLASP17 with flair. Now thanks to a suggestion from a wise sage who, years ago, said, “It’s a pity there’s no Award around for outstanding Reviewer, given the toil and investment that goes into them!” Indeed, at that time, I was not aware of language or communication journals making such Awards and so, the Outstanding JLSP Reviewer Award – was inaugurated in 2014.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"41 1","pages":"495 - 499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48814929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-02DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221117497
David M. Markowitz
This paper introduces the concept of deceptive (de)humanization, the internal belief that an outgroup is less-than-human while dishonestly acknowledging aspects of their humanity for impression management purposes. In a large online experiment (N = 1,169), participants wrote about their false or truthful opinions on an outgroup they perceived as more evolved or less evolved. Following several automated text analyses, the data indicated psychological differences in attention through word patterns. Consistent with prior work, deceptive texts contained fewer self-references and more negative emotion terms than truthful texts, and dehumanizers used more negative emotions than humanizers. New evidence suggests those who wrote deceptively about evolved groups focused the most on negative emotions compared to other participants. This work extends deception and dehumanization theory by investigating how such psychological constructs interact, and how they are reflected linguistically as communicators attempt to manage impressions and maintain a positive self-image.
{"title":"Deceptive (De)humanization: How Lying About Perceived Outgroups is Revealed in Language","authors":"David M. Markowitz","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221117497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221117497","url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces the concept of deceptive (de)humanization, the internal belief that an outgroup is less-than-human while dishonestly acknowledging aspects of their humanity for impression management purposes. In a large online experiment (N = 1,169), participants wrote about their false or truthful opinions on an outgroup they perceived as more evolved or less evolved. Following several automated text analyses, the data indicated psychological differences in attention through word patterns. Consistent with prior work, deceptive texts contained fewer self-references and more negative emotion terms than truthful texts, and dehumanizers used more negative emotions than humanizers. New evidence suggests those who wrote deceptively about evolved groups focused the most on negative emotions compared to other participants. This work extends deception and dehumanization theory by investigating how such psychological constructs interact, and how they are reflected linguistically as communicators attempt to manage impressions and maintain a positive self-image.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"135 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46533110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-25DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221115443
Stephen A. Rains, Shelby N. Carter
Although informational support can be a valuable resource for coping with illness, our understanding of how it is solicited remains incomplete. We examine the language properties of more than 20,000 posts made to an online health community to better understand the perspective of people seeking informational support and identify properties that predict community responsiveness. Compared to posts in which informational support was not requested, posts soliciting informational support were more likely to use language reflecting efforts to make meaning from uncertainty related to a poster's ongoing illness experience. Among posts in which informational support was solicited, posts that discussed life-with-illness and used language indicating specific negative emotions like anger, anxiety, and sadness yielded a greater number of responses from online community members.
{"title":"Psycholinguistic Properties of Informational Support Seeking Posts in Online Health Communities and Predictors of Community Responsiveness","authors":"Stephen A. Rains, Shelby N. Carter","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221115443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221115443","url":null,"abstract":"Although informational support can be a valuable resource for coping with illness, our understanding of how it is solicited remains incomplete. We examine the language properties of more than 20,000 posts made to an online health community to better understand the perspective of people seeking informational support and identify properties that predict community responsiveness. Compared to posts in which informational support was not requested, posts soliciting informational support were more likely to use language reflecting efforts to make meaning from uncertainty related to a poster's ongoing illness experience. Among posts in which informational support was solicited, posts that discussed life-with-illness and used language indicating specific negative emotions like anger, anxiety, and sadness yielded a greater number of responses from online community members.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"160 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43118539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-30DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221077243
Ana Beatriz Gomes Fontenele, L. E. C. D. Souza, F. Fasoli
Vocal cues are used to categorize speakers’ sexual orientation. Hearing a gay-sounding speaker can elicit discrimination. This study investigated whether gay-sounding speakers were discriminated against when applying for a job in Brazil and whether prejudice moderated such an effect. Heterosexual participants listened to a gay- or heterosexual-sounding applicant, rating him in terms of personality traits and employability. The results showed that gay-sounding candidates were discriminated against compared to heterosexual-sounding candidates, but this was true only among highly prejudiced participants.
{"title":"Who Does Discriminate Against gay-Sounding Speakers? The Role of Prejudice on Voice-Based Hiring Decisions in Brazil","authors":"Ana Beatriz Gomes Fontenele, L. E. C. D. Souza, F. Fasoli","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221077243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221077243","url":null,"abstract":"Vocal cues are used to categorize speakers’ sexual orientation. Hearing a gay-sounding speaker can elicit discrimination. This study investigated whether gay-sounding speakers were discriminated against when applying for a job in Brazil and whether prejudice moderated such an effect. Heterosexual participants listened to a gay- or heterosexual-sounding applicant, rating him in terms of personality traits and employability. The results showed that gay-sounding candidates were discriminated against compared to heterosexual-sounding candidates, but this was true only among highly prejudiced participants.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"119 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45481352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-29DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221111574
Marko Dragojevic, Jessica Gasiorek
We examined how task performance expectancy violations influence speaker evaluations. Americans listened to a Japanese-accented speaker reading a story; completed a memory test on the story's content; indicated their expected performance on the test; and then received positive, negative, or no performance feedback. Positive feedback positively violated listeners’ performance expectancies and elicited higher fluency, a more positive affective reaction, and more positive speaker evaluations, compared to no feedback. Fluency and affect mediated the effect of positive feedback on speaker evaluations.
{"title":"Effects of Task Performance Expectancy Violations on Processing Fluency and Speaker Evaluations","authors":"Marko Dragojevic, Jessica Gasiorek","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221111574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221111574","url":null,"abstract":"We examined how task performance expectancy violations influence speaker evaluations. Americans listened to a Japanese-accented speaker reading a story; completed a memory test on the story's content; indicated their expected performance on the test; and then received positive, negative, or no performance feedback. Positive feedback positively violated listeners’ performance expectancies and elicited higher fluency, a more positive affective reaction, and more positive speaker evaluations, compared to no feedback. Fluency and affect mediated the effect of positive feedback on speaker evaluations.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"107 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48937753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-28DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221111382
Matteo Masi, F. Fasoli
Perceiving a male speaker as gender atypical increases the chances of categorizing him as gay. The perception of how fluent the categorization process is can also play a role. Listeners categorized gay and straight speakers’ sexual orientation, reported their perceived categorization fluency, and rated speakers’ gender atypicality. When categorization fluency was high, gay speakers perceived as gender atypical were more likely categorized as gay. When categorization fluency was low, gender atypicality increased the likelihood of categorizing straight speakers as gay.
{"title":"When Fluency Matters: The Interplay between Categorization Fluency and Gender Atypicality on Gaydar Judgments","authors":"Matteo Masi, F. Fasoli","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221111382","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221111382","url":null,"abstract":"Perceiving a male speaker as gender atypical increases the chances of categorizing him as gay. The perception of how fluent the categorization process is can also play a role. Listeners categorized gay and straight speakers’ sexual orientation, reported their perceived categorization fluency, and rated speakers’ gender atypicality. When categorization fluency was high, gay speakers perceived as gender atypical were more likely categorized as gay. When categorization fluency was low, gender atypicality increased the likelihood of categorizing straight speakers as gay.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"41 1","pages":"746 - 759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46915243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-16DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221108120
Gijs Fannes, An-Sofie Claeys
This study examines how both the content (i.e., denial vs. apology) and the verb voice (i.e., active voice vs. passive voice) of a crisis response affect the public's perception of crisis responsibility and, subsequently, the reputation of an organization accused of wrongdoing. The results of two experiments first show that an apology results in higher responsibility attributions than denial, which, in turn, adversely affects an organization's reputation. When we consider the verb voice of the message, a crisis response that is constructed in the passive voice reduces responsibility perceptions more than the active voice, leading to less reputational damage. An interaction effect shows, however, that this result only holds true for a passive denial strategy and not for apologies. As such, when an organization needs to deny an accusation, it seems wise to construct the message in the passive voice in order to strengthen the denial and effectively protect the organizational reputation.
{"title":"Shaping Attributions of Crisis Responsibility in the Case of an Accusation: The Role of Active and Passive Voice in Crisis Response Strategies","authors":"Gijs Fannes, An-Sofie Claeys","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221108120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221108120","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how both the content (i.e., denial vs. apology) and the verb voice (i.e., active voice vs. passive voice) of a crisis response affect the public's perception of crisis responsibility and, subsequently, the reputation of an organization accused of wrongdoing. The results of two experiments first show that an apology results in higher responsibility attributions than denial, which, in turn, adversely affects an organization's reputation. When we consider the verb voice of the message, a crisis response that is constructed in the passive voice reduces responsibility perceptions more than the active voice, leading to less reputational damage. An interaction effect shows, however, that this result only holds true for a passive denial strategy and not for apologies. As such, when an organization needs to deny an accusation, it seems wise to construct the message in the passive voice in order to strengthen the denial and effectively protect the organizational reputation.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"3 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49382619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-03DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221105096
Craig Fowler, Quinten S. Bernhold
The present study was grounded in the revised communicative ecology model of successful aging (CEMSA) and examined whether brief, passing remarks made by older adults about aging influence both young adults’ aging efficacy and their expectations regarding aging. Young adult participants (n = 322) were randomly assigned to read a single vignette. In the vignette an older adult invoked either a negative age-based reason, a non-age-based reason, or a positive age-based reason to account for behavior that could be taken to reflect age-related stereotypes pertaining to physical decline, cognitive decline, or aversion to technology. Analyzes revealed that participants who read the positive age-based accounts perceived the aging process to have been portrayed more favorably. Consequently, they reported higher levels of positive affect about aging which translated into their feeling more efficacious about managing their own aging, and into having more positive expectations regarding aging in general.
{"title":"Implications of Older Adults’ Attributions for Young Adults’ Attitudes to Aging: A Vignette Study","authors":"Craig Fowler, Quinten S. Bernhold","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221105096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221105096","url":null,"abstract":"The present study was grounded in the revised communicative ecology model of successful aging (CEMSA) and examined whether brief, passing remarks made by older adults about aging influence both young adults’ aging efficacy and their expectations regarding aging. Young adult participants (n = 322) were randomly assigned to read a single vignette. In the vignette an older adult invoked either a negative age-based reason, a non-age-based reason, or a positive age-based reason to account for behavior that could be taken to reflect age-related stereotypes pertaining to physical decline, cognitive decline, or aversion to technology. Analyzes revealed that participants who read the positive age-based accounts perceived the aging process to have been portrayed more favorably. Consequently, they reported higher levels of positive affect about aging which translated into their feeling more efficacious about managing their own aging, and into having more positive expectations regarding aging in general.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"31 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49011655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-01DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221081735
J. D'Arcey, J. E. Fox Tree
Sarcasm has been defined in a plethora of different ways, but too often the definitions hinge on researchers’ own perceptions of what constitutes sarcasm or verbal irony, and not enough on the perceptions of people producing the sarcastic content. We asked people (N = 82) to transform internet forum posts to make them sarcastic without providing information about what sarcasm is. Participants then critically examined their creations. People identified a variety of strategies that they use to communicate sarcasm in writing. A content analysis of written productions by eight raters confirmed the use of these strategies, several of which were more likely than by chance alone to be present alongside sarcasm. Results are useful for understanding sarcasm production, comprehension, and linguistic rapport.
{"title":"Oh, SO Sarcastic: Diverse Strategies for Being Sarcastic","authors":"J. D'Arcey, J. E. Fox Tree","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221081735","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221081735","url":null,"abstract":"Sarcasm has been defined in a plethora of different ways, but too often the definitions hinge on researchers’ own perceptions of what constitutes sarcasm or verbal irony, and not enough on the perceptions of people producing the sarcastic content. We asked people (N = 82) to transform internet forum posts to make them sarcastic without providing information about what sarcasm is. Participants then critically examined their creations. People identified a variety of strategies that they use to communicate sarcasm in writing. A content analysis of written productions by eight raters confirmed the use of these strategies, several of which were more likely than by chance alone to be present alongside sarcasm. Results are useful for understanding sarcasm production, comprehension, and linguistic rapport.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"41 1","pages":"288 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48636703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-09DOI: 10.1177/0261927X221095865
Zachary P. Rosen
The current paper details a novel quantitative framework leveraging recent advances in AI and Natural Language Processing to quantitatively assess language convergence and accommodation. This new framework is computationally cheap and straightforward to implement. The framework is then applied to a case study of immigration rhetoric in the lead up to the 2016 general election in the USA. Major results from the case study show that (1) Democrats and Republicans exhibited significant language convergence with members of their own parties, (2) President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton converged with Senate Democrats’ immigration rhetoric, (3) Democrats accommodated the immigration rhetoric of both President Barack Obama and (candidate) Hillary Clinton, (4) contrary to initial hypotheses, Donald Trump's vitriolic immigration rhetoric did not show signs of language convergence with Republicans in the Senate, and (5) equally surprising, Senate Republicans showed significant non-accommodation to Donald Trump despite potential political costs for having done so.
{"title":"A BERT's Eye View: A Big Data Framework for Assessing Language Convergence and Accommodation","authors":"Zachary P. Rosen","doi":"10.1177/0261927X221095865","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221095865","url":null,"abstract":"The current paper details a novel quantitative framework leveraging recent advances in AI and Natural Language Processing to quantitatively assess language convergence and accommodation. This new framework is computationally cheap and straightforward to implement. The framework is then applied to a case study of immigration rhetoric in the lead up to the 2016 general election in the USA. Major results from the case study show that (1) Democrats and Republicans exhibited significant language convergence with members of their own parties, (2) President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton converged with Senate Democrats’ immigration rhetoric, (3) Democrats accommodated the immigration rhetoric of both President Barack Obama and (candidate) Hillary Clinton, (4) contrary to initial hypotheses, Donald Trump's vitriolic immigration rhetoric did not show signs of language convergence with Republicans in the Senate, and (5) equally surprising, Senate Republicans showed significant non-accommodation to Donald Trump despite potential political costs for having done so.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"60 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44465997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：