{"title":"Dragomir, Cristina-Ioana. 2023. Making the immigrant soldier: How race, ethnicity, class and gender intersect in the US military. Chicago and Springfield: University of Illinois Press. pp. 258.","authors":"Mitchell A. Orenstein","doi":"10.1111/imig.13250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13250","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"62 2","pages":"247-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140342919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Hwee-Hwa Chan, Felicity. 2022. Tensions in diversity: Spaces for collective life in Los Angeles. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. pp. 264","authors":"Norma Schemschat","doi":"10.1111/imig.13247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13247","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"62 2","pages":"242-244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140342946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>In the context of a methodological turn in migration studies since the early 2000s, this commentary focuses on three key contributions of feminist methodologies in migration research over the past two decades. This is not to suggest that feminist methodologies are “new,” or that some of these methodological orientations were not present in earlier work, but rather to highlight methodologies rooted in feminist praxis that have become more prevalent in migration studies recently. This commentary focuses on questions of positionality and reflexivity, radical care and (co-)creative methodologies. This is not an exhaustive list but provides examples of the transformative and generative potential of feminist methodologies in migration studies (see also Cleton & Scuzzarello, this issue; Fresnoza-Flot, this issue).</p><p>Before delving into the details of these three methodological contributions, I outline here what I believe are feminist epistemologies and praxis. Feminism is aligned with critical approaches to epistemology that squarely centre power in the production and reproduction of knowledge (Kouri-Towe & Mahrouse, <span>2023</span>; Nawyn, <span>2010</span>; Silvey, <span>2004</span>). Rather than assuming “objectivity,” feminist researchers acknowledge that our research questions, methods, data collection and analysis are all embedded in particular contexts and ways of knowing. Feminist research also attends to divisions of labour – both in the research questions we ask, but also in the doing of research. How these different roles are valued and reflected in the research process and “outputs” are particularly feminist concerns. Feminist praxis is oriented in the process of research, but also, through critical epistemologies and ontologies, the changes that come about through our individual and collective work. Feminist researchers are not content to simply describe what is; we are driven to uncover and dismantle structures of oppression. Feminist methodologies therefore have the potential to be generative and transformative. In particular, they extend beyond studies explicitly focused on women or gender, to encompass ontological, epistemological, ethical and methodological approaches that can be applied to any research project.</p><p>Feminist researchers have normalized explicit positioning of researchers within intersecting power relations in their work (see Fresnoza-Flot, this issue). This reflexive positionality is particularly important in migration studies, where severe power inequities – between research participants and researchers, service providers and gatekeepers – result from precarious legal status, differential citizenship, and reliance on governments, intergovernmental organizations and NGOs for basic services (Clark-Kazak, <span>2021</span>). Migration experiences are diverse and affected by intersecting power relations rooted in racialization, gender, age, class, (dis)ability, religion, etc. (see Cleton & Scuzzarel
自 21 世纪初以来，移民研究出现了方法论转向，在此背景下，本评论将重点关注过去二十年来女性主义方法论在移民研究中的三大贡献。这并不是说女性主义方法论是 "新 "的，也不是说其中一些方法论取向在早期研究中并不存在，而是要强调植根于女性主义实践的方法论，这些方法论最近在移民研究中变得更加普遍。本评论侧重于立场和反思性、激进关怀和（共同）创造性方法等问题。这并不是一份详尽的清单，但它提供了一些例子，说明女性主义方法论在移民研究中的变革和生成潜力（另见 Cleton & Scuzzarello, 本期；Fresnoza-Flot, 本期）。在深入探讨这三种方法论贡献的细节之前，我在此概述一下我认为的女性主义认识论和实践。女性主义与认识论的批判性方法一致，都是以知识的生产和再生产中的权力为中心（Kouri-Towe & Mahrouse, 2023; Nawyn, 2010; Silvey, 2004）。女性主义研究者并不假定 "客观性"，而是承认我们的研究问题、方法、数据收集和分析都嵌入了特定的背景和认知方式。女性主义研究还关注劳动分工--既包括我们提出的研究问题，也包括研究过程。如何在研究过程和 "成果 "中重视和反映这些不同的角色是女性主义特别关注的问题。女性主义实践不仅以研究过程为导向，而且还通过批判性认识论和本体论，以我们的个人和集体工作所带来的变化为导向。女权主义研究人员并不满足于简单地描述现状；我们的动力是揭露和瓦解压迫结构。因此，女权主义方法论具有创造性和变革性的潜力。尤其是，它们超越了明确关注女性或性别的研究，涵盖了本体论、认识论、伦理和方法论方法，可应用于任何研究项目。女性主义研究人员已将研究人员在其工作中相互交织的权力关系中的明确定位正常化（见 Fresnoza-Flot，本期）。这种反思性定位在移民研究中尤为重要，因为在移民研究中，研究参与者与研究者、服务提供者与看门人之间的权力严重不平等，这源于不稳定的法律地位、不同的公民身份，以及对政府、政府间组织和非政府组织基本服务的依赖（Clark-Kazak，2021 年）。移民经历多种多样，并受到植根于种族化、性别、年龄、阶级、（不）能力、宗教等方面的交叉权力关系的影响（见 Cleton & Scuzzarello，本期呼吁在移民治理研究中使用交叉性）。因此，在移民研究中，将自己置于这些权力关系中，并反思其对研究的影响，是女性主义的长期实践，也是越来越普遍的做法，甚至在那些没有明确表示自己是女性主义研究者的研究者中也是如此。在这种越来越关注立场性和反思性的背景下，女性主义移民学者围绕我们工作中的生活经验，引领了重要的认识论和存在论质疑。例如，在批判性难民研究中，女性主义学者参与了拒绝以损害为中心的叙事的行动，这种叙事强化了 "无助的受害者 "的陈词滥调，转而强调了认真对待研究者自身流离失所和移民经历的创造性可能性（Espiritu，2006；Espiritu & Duong，2018；Nguyen & Phu，2021）。在强迫移民研究中，《国际移民研究联合会伦理守则》（2018 年）明确质疑那些空降并提取他人生活信息的研究人员所拥有的 "专业知识"。这些女权主义倡议摒弃了象征性的做法，将研究和叙事的控制权转移给受研究影响最大、与研究牵连最深的人。在过去二十年中，随着人们对移民研究方法的日益关注，围绕移民背景下出现的具体伦理问题的对话也随之展开（Bloemraad & Menjívar, 2022; Bose, 2020; Krause, 2017）。女性主义研究人员引领了这些讨论，并超越了植根于程序伦理的主流范式，考虑到了更广泛的研究关系。这些工作大多直接或间接地受到了女权主义激进关怀工作的影响（Clark-Kazak，2023 年）。激进关怀以互惠关系、情感和预防伤害的积极方法为中心（Hobart & Kneese, 2020; Lawson, 2007; Tronto, 1998）。
{"title":"Feminist methodologies in migration research","authors":"Christina Clark-Kazak","doi":"10.1111/imig.13224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13224","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the context of a methodological turn in migration studies since the early 2000s, this commentary focuses on three key contributions of feminist methodologies in migration research over the past two decades. This is not to suggest that feminist methodologies are “new,” or that some of these methodological orientations were not present in earlier work, but rather to highlight methodologies rooted in feminist praxis that have become more prevalent in migration studies recently. This commentary focuses on questions of positionality and reflexivity, radical care and (co-)creative methodologies. This is not an exhaustive list but provides examples of the transformative and generative potential of feminist methodologies in migration studies (see also Cleton & Scuzzarello, this issue; Fresnoza-Flot, this issue).</p><p>Before delving into the details of these three methodological contributions, I outline here what I believe are feminist epistemologies and praxis. Feminism is aligned with critical approaches to epistemology that squarely centre power in the production and reproduction of knowledge (Kouri-Towe & Mahrouse, <span>2023</span>; Nawyn, <span>2010</span>; Silvey, <span>2004</span>). Rather than assuming “objectivity,” feminist researchers acknowledge that our research questions, methods, data collection and analysis are all embedded in particular contexts and ways of knowing. Feminist research also attends to divisions of labour – both in the research questions we ask, but also in the doing of research. How these different roles are valued and reflected in the research process and “outputs” are particularly feminist concerns. Feminist praxis is oriented in the process of research, but also, through critical epistemologies and ontologies, the changes that come about through our individual and collective work. Feminist researchers are not content to simply describe what is; we are driven to uncover and dismantle structures of oppression. Feminist methodologies therefore have the potential to be generative and transformative. In particular, they extend beyond studies explicitly focused on women or gender, to encompass ontological, epistemological, ethical and methodological approaches that can be applied to any research project.</p><p>Feminist researchers have normalized explicit positioning of researchers within intersecting power relations in their work (see Fresnoza-Flot, this issue). This reflexive positionality is particularly important in migration studies, where severe power inequities – between research participants and researchers, service providers and gatekeepers – result from precarious legal status, differential citizenship, and reliance on governments, intergovernmental organizations and NGOs for basic services (Clark-Kazak, <span>2021</span>). Migration experiences are diverse and affected by intersecting power relations rooted in racialization, gender, age, class, (dis)ability, religion, etc. (see Cleton & Scuzzarel","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"62 2","pages":"237-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.13224","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140342965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Jones, Garett. 2022. The culture transplant: How migrants make the economies they move to a lot like the ones they left. Stanford: Stanford University Press. pp. 228.","authors":"Yusuf Emre Akgündüz","doi":"10.1111/imig.13249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13249","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"62 2","pages":"245-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140342970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Kanaaneh, Rhoda. 2023. The Right Kind of Suffering: Gender, Sexuality and Arab Asylum Seekers in America. Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 194","authors":"Uğur Yıldız","doi":"10.1111/imig.13248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13248","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"62 2","pages":"250-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140343046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study attempts to fill an important gap in the empirical literature by investigating the impact of institutional quality in destination countries on emigrants from Türkiye using bilateral migration data from 2010 through 2020. For this purpose, the study builds an augmented gravity model, including economic, geographic, and cultural variables in an exponential form and estimates it by the Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) method. Empirical results significantly confirm the pulling role of strong institutions in destination countries for emigrants from Türkiye since all institutional quality indicators are positively associated with emigrant movements, albeit just one of them, regulatory quality, is statistically insignificant. Among indicators of institutional quality, the most pulling ones for emigrants are voice and accountability and the rule of law, followed by government effectiveness, control of corruption, and political stability and absence of violence, respectively. Overall results indicate that institutions are front-line players in the emigrants' migration decision and destination choice process. In this context, policy-makers in both Türkiye and the destination country may implement an institutional policy considering the outcomes stemming from migration movements.
{"title":"Institutional quality and emigration nexus: Empirical evidence from Türkiye","authors":"Emrah Eray Akça, Onur Çelik","doi":"10.1111/imig.13258","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imig.13258","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study attempts to fill an important gap in the empirical literature by investigating the impact of institutional quality in destination countries on emigrants from Türkiye using bilateral migration data from 2010 through 2020. For this purpose, the study builds an augmented gravity model, including economic, geographic, and cultural variables in an exponential form and estimates it by the Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) method. Empirical results significantly confirm the pulling role of strong institutions in destination countries for emigrants from Türkiye since all institutional quality indicators are positively associated with emigrant movements, albeit just one of them, regulatory quality, is statistically insignificant. Among indicators of institutional quality, the most pulling ones for emigrants are voice and accountability and the rule of law, followed by government effectiveness, control of corruption, and political stability and absence of violence, respectively. Overall results indicate that institutions are front-line players in the emigrants' migration decision and destination choice process. In this context, policy-makers in both Türkiye and the destination country may implement an institutional policy considering the outcomes stemming from migration movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"62 3","pages":"3-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140340833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
While in recent years, qualitative social network analysis (SNA) has advanced considerably – particularly in migration research – there is still an overall tendency to focus more on issues of network structure and on the generation of data, rather than on how data can be interpreted and analysed qualitatively in practice. In this article, we discuss how a genuinely qualitative SNA should not only apply qualitative techniques in generating visual and oral network data but also in the analytical processes. Building on our earlier work, we advance methodological debates by presenting the idea of ‘conceptual reflexivity’: an awareness of how our thinking about networks and the ways in which we interact with participants – and the wider field – inform layers of meaning making. Using two recent examples from our migration research, we explore the inter‐subjectivity of the research encounter, offering insights into the ‘craft’ of qualitative SNA and the epistemological issues underpinning it. In doing so, we aim to make analytical processes more open and visible, to reveal, so to speak, what goes on behind the curtain: the ‘magic trick’ of how qualitative SNA is performed.
{"title":"Qualitative analysis of migrants' network data: Using conceptual reflexivity to reveal the ‘magic trick’","authors":"Alessio D'Angelo, Louise Ryan","doi":"10.1111/imig.13257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13257","url":null,"abstract":"While in recent years, qualitative social network analysis (SNA) has advanced considerably – particularly in migration research – there is still an overall tendency to focus more on issues of network structure and on the generation of data, rather than on how data can be interpreted and analysed qualitatively in practice. In this article, we discuss how a genuinely qualitative SNA should not only apply qualitative techniques in generating visual and oral network data but also in the analytical processes. Building on our earlier work, we advance methodological debates by presenting the idea of ‘conceptual reflexivity’: an awareness of how our thinking about networks and the ways in which we interact with participants – and the wider field – inform layers of meaning making. Using two recent examples from our migration research, we explore the inter‐subjectivity of the research encounter, offering insights into the ‘craft’ of qualitative SNA and the epistemological issues underpinning it. In doing so, we aim to make analytical processes more open and visible, to reveal, so to speak, what goes on behind the curtain: the ‘magic trick’ of how qualitative SNA is performed.","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140196165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research into transnational political engagement of non‐resident citizens has largely focused on the Global South and less on the Global North. This article focuses on non‐resident United States citizens, or overseas Americans, asking what motivates them to become politically engaged. This article contributes insights to an insufficiently explored case. Drawing from 14 semi‐structured interviews with strongly politically engaged US citizens living abroad, this article shows that they engage in political activism for many of the same reasons as individuals from other countries, as well as ones which may be unique to the US case. Key factors include mobilising to change things at home, the role of the United States in the world, civic duty, fulfilling work and reactive transnationalism. The article concludes with policy recommendations and sets the scene for future comparative research, both within the Global North and between Global North and Global South non‐resident citizen groups.
{"title":"Democrats abroad: What motivates core activists to engage in political transnationalism?","authors":"Amanda von Klekowski von Koppenfels","doi":"10.1111/imig.13251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13251","url":null,"abstract":"Research into transnational political engagement of non‐resident citizens has largely focused on the Global South and less on the Global North. This article focuses on non‐resident United States citizens, or overseas Americans, asking what motivates them to become politically engaged. This article contributes insights to an insufficiently explored case. Drawing from 14 semi‐structured interviews with strongly politically engaged US citizens living abroad, this article shows that they engage in political activism for many of the same reasons as individuals from other countries, as well as ones which may be unique to the US case. Key factors include mobilising to change things at home, the role of the United States in the world, civic duty, fulfilling work and reactive transnationalism. The article concludes with policy recommendations and sets the scene for future comparative research, both within the Global North and between Global North and Global South non‐resident citizen groups.","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140162167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Using data for the United States, we explore how interactions with immigrants during school age affect imagination during adulthood for native children. The analysis uses The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health survey and focuses on the impact of differences in the number of immigrants across cohorts within schools. Results suggest that exposure to immigrant classmates has positive effects on the long-term imagination of natives. Increasing the number of immigrants in the grade by 20 students, would increase the likelihood of reporting a high level of imagination during adulthood by three percentage points. We suggest that the effect is not coming via direct friendship with immigrant students, but through increasing exposure to diverse ideas and experiences.
我们利用美国的数据，探讨了学龄期与移民的互动如何影响本地儿童成年后的想象力。分析采用了《全国青少年到成人健康纵向研究》（National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health）调查，重点关注学校内不同组群中移民数量差异的影响。结果表明，接触移民同学对本地人的长期想象力有积极影响。如果年级中的移民人数增加 20 人，那么成年后报告想象力丰富的可能性就会增加 3 个百分点。我们认为，这种影响不是通过与移民学生的直接友谊产生的，而是通过增加接触不同思想和经验的机会产生的。
{"title":"Exploring the difference: Immigrant peers and the imagination of natives","authors":"Ana Alanis-Amaya, Carlos Vargas-Silva","doi":"10.1111/imig.13254","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imig.13254","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using data for the United States, we explore how interactions with immigrants during school age affect imagination during adulthood for native children. The analysis uses The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health survey and focuses on the impact of differences in the number of immigrants across cohorts within schools. Results suggest that exposure to immigrant classmates has positive effects on the long-term imagination of natives. Increasing the number of immigrants in the grade by 20 students, would increase the likelihood of reporting a high level of imagination during adulthood by three percentage points. We suggest that the effect is not coming via direct friendship with immigrant students, but through increasing exposure to diverse ideas and experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"62 2","pages":"3-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.13254","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140142112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maria Estela Rivero Fuentes, Tom Hare, Laura Miller-Graff
More is known about how ‘push factors’ motivate emigration and how immigrants adapt to their new environment than about psychological factors associated with migration intentions for those experiencing adversity in their country of origin. This paper explores the association between multisystem resilience and migration intentions among youth in Honduras. In this context of high economic need and contextual violence, higher levels of resilience are associated with higher levels of migration intentions among those who have a job and thus the ability to navigate or negotiate access to resources – economic, social and psychological – that make it possible to consider migration. Among those who have not been victims of violence and consequently may not have that motivation to migrate, higher levels of resilience are associated with lower migration intentions.
{"title":"Between a rock and a hard place: Multisystem resilience and Honduran youth migration intentions","authors":"Maria Estela Rivero Fuentes, Tom Hare, Laura Miller-Graff","doi":"10.1111/imig.13253","DOIUrl":"10.1111/imig.13253","url":null,"abstract":"<p>More is known about how ‘push factors’ motivate emigration and how immigrants adapt to their new environment than about psychological factors associated with migration intentions for those experiencing adversity in their country of origin. This paper explores the association between multisystem resilience and migration intentions among youth in Honduras. In this context of high economic need and contextual violence, higher levels of resilience are associated with higher levels of migration intentions among those who have a job and thus the ability to navigate or negotiate access to resources – economic, social and psychological – that make it possible to consider migration. Among those who have not been victims of violence and consequently may not have that motivation to migrate, higher levels of resilience are associated with lower migration intentions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"62 2","pages":"53-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140104980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：