首页 > 最新文献

Public Relations Review最新文献

英文 中文
Publics’ perceptions of legitimacy in corporate social advocacy: A computational analysis of the role of ideological congruence 公众对企业社会宣传合法性的看法:意识形态一致性作用的计算分析
IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102486

For corporations engaged in corporate social advocacy (CSA), establishing legitimacy among publics is challenging when they take stands along clear ideological lines on controversial issues. This study examined two questions: (1) how would the congruence between individuals’ political ideologies and corporations’ CSA stances influence perceived CSA legitimacy; and (2) how would individuals’ political ideology strength moderate this relationship? A computational analysis was conducted to examine individual-level ideological congruence and perceived CSA legitimacy in six real-world CSA events. Pairing sentiment analysis with a self-trained model for individual ideology detection, this study cross-analyzed naturalistic data generated by 5181 ordinary users involved in the CSA events on Twitter. It was found that individuals’ perceptions of corporations involved in CSA were highly dependent on the extent to which their own political ideologies were congruent with the corporations’ CSA stances. Also, the influence of ideological congruence was amplified among individuals with stronger political ideologies. However, CSA legitimacy perceptions can be highly situational, with individual events potentially yielding varied results depending on factors such as the issue’s socio-historical context. This study overall demonstrates the important role that individual-level political factors can play in influencing publics’ CSA legitimacy perceptions. This study also highlights the feasibility of using cutting-edge computational methods in assessing publics’ voices on social media as a source of CSA legitimacy.

对于参与企业社会倡导(CSA)的企业来说,当它们在有争议的问题上采取明确的意识形态立场时,在公众中建立合法性就会面临挑战。本研究探讨了两个问题:(1) 个人政治意识形态与企业社会倡导立场之间的一致性会如何影响企业社会倡导的感知合法性;(2) 个人的政治意识形态强度会如何调节这种关系?我们进行了计算分析,以研究六个真实世界 CSA 事件中个人层面的意识形态一致性和感知 CSA 合法性。本研究将情感分析与个人意识形态检测的自我训练模型相结合,交叉分析了推特上参与 CSA 事件的 5181 名普通用户生成的自然数据。研究发现,个人对参与 CSA 的企业的看法高度依赖于其自身政治意识形态与企业 CSA 立场的一致程度。而且,意识形态一致性对政治意识形态较强的个人的影响更大。然而,对 CSA 合法性的看法可能具有很强的情景性,个别事件可能会因问题的社会历史背景等因素而产生不同的结果。本研究从总体上证明了个人层面的政治因素在影响公众的 CSA 合法性认知方面所起的重要作用。本研究还强调了使用前沿计算方法评估公众在社交媒体上作为 CSA 合法性来源的声音的可行性。
{"title":"Publics’ perceptions of legitimacy in corporate social advocacy: A computational analysis of the role of ideological congruence","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102486","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102486","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For corporations engaged in corporate social advocacy (CSA), establishing legitimacy among publics is challenging when they take stands along clear ideological lines on controversial issues. This study examined two questions: (1) how would the congruence between individuals’ political ideologies and corporations’ CSA stances influence perceived CSA legitimacy; and (2) how would individuals’ political ideology strength moderate this relationship? A computational analysis was conducted to examine individual-level ideological congruence and perceived CSA legitimacy in six real-world CSA events. Pairing sentiment analysis with a self-trained model for individual ideology detection, this study cross-analyzed naturalistic data generated by 5181 ordinary users involved in the CSA events on Twitter. It was found that individuals’ perceptions of corporations involved in CSA were highly dependent on the extent to which their own political ideologies were congruent with the corporations’ CSA stances. Also, the influence of ideological congruence was amplified among individuals with stronger political ideologies. However, CSA legitimacy perceptions can be highly situational, with individual events potentially yielding varied results depending on factors such as the issue’s socio-historical context. This study overall demonstrates the important role that individual-level political factors can play in influencing publics’ CSA legitimacy perceptions. This study also highlights the feasibility of using cutting-edge computational methods in assessing publics’ voices on social media as a source of CSA legitimacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811124000651/pdfft?md5=4091bc6d9fcca9124e7c4a7bef36eab4&pid=1-s2.0-S0363811124000651-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141960701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When ethics are compromised: Understanding how employees react to corporate moral violations 当道德受到损害时:了解员工对企业道德违规行为的反应
IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102482

This study investigated how employees react to corporate moral violations against external stakeholders, such as customers, the community, and the environment. Drawing from the deonance theory, we examined the relationships between employees' perceptions of corporate moral violations, their moral emotions (anger and sympathy), and their moral actions (external whistleblowing and compensating behavior) when they witness their company's ethical transgressions targeting external stakeholders. In addition, the study examined the moderating effects of employee-oriented corporate social responsibility and perceived moral violation intentionality on the impact of moral violation on employees’ emotional and behavioral reactions. The proposed model was tested using an online survey panel of 417 full-time U.S. workers. The results mostly supported the hypotheses, indicating that perceived corporate moral violation interacted with employee-oriented CSR and moral violation intentionality to affect employees' anger and sympathy, which, in turn, influenced their moral actions.

本研究调查了员工对企业违反外部利益相关者(如客户、社区和环境)的道德行为的反应。借鉴失调理论,我们考察了当员工目睹企业针对外部利益相关者的道德违规行为时,他们对企业道德违规行为的感知、他们的道德情绪(愤怒和同情)以及他们的道德行动(外部举报和补偿行为)之间的关系。此外,研究还考察了以员工为导向的企业社会责任和感知到的道德违规意向性对道德违规对员工情绪和行为反应影响的调节作用。研究使用了一个由 417 名美国全职员工组成的在线调查小组,对所提出的模型进行了检验。结果大多支持假设,表明感知到的企业道德侵犯与员工导向的企业社会责任和道德侵犯意向性相互作用,影响了员工的愤怒和同情,进而影响了他们的道德行为。
{"title":"When ethics are compromised: Understanding how employees react to corporate moral violations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102482","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102482","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated how employees react to corporate moral violations against external stakeholders, such as customers, the community, and the environment. Drawing from the deonance theory, we examined the relationships between employees' perceptions of corporate moral violations, their moral emotions (anger and sympathy), and their moral actions (external whistleblowing and compensating behavior) when they witness their company's ethical transgressions targeting external stakeholders. In addition, the study examined the moderating effects of employee-oriented corporate social responsibility and perceived moral violation intentionality on the impact of moral violation on employees’ emotional and behavioral reactions. The proposed model was tested using an online survey panel of 417 full-time U.S. workers. The results mostly supported the hypotheses, indicating that perceived corporate moral violation interacted with employee-oriented CSR and moral violation intentionality to affect employees' anger and sympathy, which, in turn, influenced their moral actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141960700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An exploration of PR Week UK’s framing of specialist PR identities (1985–2010) 探索英国公关周刊对专业公关身份的塑造(1985-2010 年)
IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102468

A trend of increased specialisation in public relations has been widely asserted but little substantiated. Specifically, there is no longitudinal study of the development of specialist coverage in the principal trade journal of the industry, PR Week. Neither has there been an exploration of the perspectives of PR Week UK’s senior managers on specialist-practitioner identities. This article seeks to fill these gaps.

This examination of specialist coverage in PR Week 1985–2010 finds a punctuated process of constructing specialist practitioner identities within an institutional subsystem. We examine over 220 editions of PR Week, in the UK, over a 26-year period. We calculate that there was indeed a statistically significant trend of published regular specialist pages.

We analysed editorial announcements about regular specialist pages and interviewed three former senior managers from PR Week. We considered page titles as both content and discourse. We also adapted Bucher et al.’s (2016) framing strategies. In doing so, we revised one of Bucher et al.’s strategies, re-terming the ‘self-casting’ strategy as a media casting strategy in the context of a trade publication’s framing of a profession’s boundaries.

Building on the scholarship of Edwards and Pieczka (2013), we suggest that the trade media play an institutional role in boundary setting. A trade publication's role in the promotion of jurisdictions was, and has not been, previously ascribed by Abbott (1988) or Waisbord (2019). We newly find that when PR Week introduced specialist pages, the publication’s executive actively sought to bring sector-specialist practitioners, with waning identification with the profession, back into the PR fold. Like a sheepdog, PR Week played a proactive institutional role in the professional reframing of public relations around specialisms. Yet the boundaries that PR Week defended were fuzzy given that over 95% of the regular specialist pages titles did not include the name ‘PR’. We also argue, that in establishing the specialist pages PR Week executives not only championed PR’s legitimacy, but also sought to protect the magazine’s market and to enhance the title’s journalistic brand.

公共关系日益专业化的趋势已经被广泛证实,但却鲜有证据。具体来说,对于公共关系行业的主要期刊《公共关系周报》上专业报道的发展并没有纵向研究。英国《公共关系周报》的高级经理们对专业从业者身份的看法也没有进行过探讨。本文试图填补这些空白。本文对《公关周刊》1985-2010 年的专家报道进行了研究,发现在一个机构子系统中,专家从业者身份的构建过程是一个点缀性的过程。我们研究了英国 26 年间超过 220 期的《公关周刊》。我们分析了有关定期专业版面的编辑公告,并采访了《公关周刊》的三位前高级经理。我们将页面标题视为内容和论述。我们还采用了 Bucher 等人(2016 年)的框架策略。在此过程中,我们对 Bucher 等人的策略之一进行了修订,将 "自我塑造 "策略重新命名为媒体塑造策略,其背景是行业出版物对某一行业边界的框定。Abbott (1988)和 Waisbord (2019)之前都未对行业出版物在促进司法管辖区方面的作用进行过论述。我们新近发现,当《公关周刊》推出专业版面时,该刊物的管理者积极寻求将对公关行业认同感减弱的行业专家从业者拉回公关行业。像牧羊犬一样,《公共关系周报》在围绕专业性的公共关系职业重构中扮演了积极的机构角色。然而,《公关周刊》所捍卫的界限是模糊的,因为超过 95% 的常规专业页面标题都不包括 "公关 "这个名称。我们还认为,《公关周刊》的高管们在设立专业版面时,不仅捍卫了公关的合法性,还试图保护杂志的市场,提升杂志的新闻品牌。
{"title":"An exploration of PR Week UK’s framing of specialist PR identities (1985–2010)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102468","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102468","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A trend of increased specialisation in public relations has been widely asserted but little substantiated. Specifically, there is no longitudinal study of the development of specialist coverage in the principal trade journal of the industry, <em>PR Week.</em> Neither has there been an exploration of the perspectives of <em>PR Week</em> UK’s senior managers on specialist-practitioner identities. This article seeks to fill these gaps.</p><p>This examination of specialist coverage in <em>PR Week</em> 1985–2010 finds a punctuated process of constructing specialist practitioner identities within an institutional subsystem. We examine over 220 editions of <em>PR Week,</em> in the UK, over a 26-year period. We calculate that there was indeed a statistically significant trend of published regular specialist pages.</p><p>We analysed editorial announcements about regular specialist pages and interviewed three former senior managers from <em>PR Week</em>. We considered page titles as both content and discourse. We also adapted Bucher et al.’s (2016) framing strategies. In doing so, we revised one of Bucher et al.’s strategies, re-terming the ‘self-casting’ strategy as a <em>media casting</em> strategy in the context of a trade publication’s framing of a profession’s boundaries.</p><p>Building on the scholarship of Edwards and Pieczka (2013), we suggest that the trade media play an institutional role in boundary setting. A trade publication's role in the promotion of jurisdictions was, and has not been, previously ascribed by Abbott (1988) or Waisbord (2019). We newly find that when <em>PR Week</em> introduced specialist pages, the publication’s executive <em>actively</em> sought to bring sector-specialist practitioners, with waning identification with the profession, back into the PR fold. Like a sheepdog, <em>PR Week</em> played a <em>proactive</em> institutional role in the professional reframing of public relations around specialisms. Yet the boundaries that <em>PR Week</em> defended were fuzzy given that over 95% of the regular specialist pages titles did not include the name ‘PR’. We also argue, that in establishing the specialist pages <em>PR Week</em> executives not only championed PR’s legitimacy, but also sought to protect the magazine’s market and to enhance the title’s journalistic brand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036381112400047X/pdfft?md5=b3c1fcc92ee96ebc60bc3896e932d52b&pid=1-s2.0-S036381112400047X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141637323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pushing hands and buttons: The effects of corporate social issue stance communication and online comment (in)civility on publics’ responses 推手和按钮:企业社会问题立场传播和网络评论(不)文明对公众反应的影响
IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102488
Wenqing Zhao , Xuerong Lu , Yan Jin , Toni G.L.A. van der Meer

Despite increasing interest and involvement in corporate social advocacy (CSA) among companies, there are growing concerns among public relations scholars and practitioners regarding the undesired outcomes of CSA communication. To advance the knowledge of whether and how CSA communication might contribute to enhancing publics’ support for an organization, a 3 (organizational issue stance: pro-refugee immigration vs. against-refugee immigration vs. open dialogue) x 2 (social media comment civility: civil vs. uncivil) between-subjects online experiment was conducted with a U.S. adult sample (N = 1388). We found when the organization expressed its pro-refugee immigration stance (in contrast to advocating against refugee immigration or calling for open dialogue), greater support toward the organization was intended by participants. Advocating for open dialogue about refugee immigration resulted in undesired effects only when social media user comments following the CSA communication were uncivil, as it led to higher level of conflicted and cynical feelings sequentially, which in turn lowered participants’ intended support for the organization. Political ideology and pre-existing issue stance were key moderators influencing participants’ responses to the organization’s CSA statement. Theoretical and practical implications for public relations scholars and practitioners are further discussed.

尽管公司对企业社会倡导(CSA)的兴趣和参与度越来越高,但公共关系学者和实践者对 CSA 传播的不良结果也越来越担忧。为了进一步了解 CSA 传播是否以及如何有助于提高公众对组织的支持,我们在美国成人样本(N = 1388)中进行了一个 3(组织问题立场:支持难民移民 vs. 反对难民移民 vs. 开放对话)x 2(社交媒体评论文明程度:文明 vs. 不文明)的主体间在线实验。我们发现,当组织表达其支持难民移民的立场时(与倡导反对难民移民或呼吁公开对话形成对比),参与者会对该组织表示更大的支持。只有在 CSA 传播后的社交媒体用户评论不文明时,倡导就难民移民问题进行公开对话才会产生不良影响,因为这会导致更高水平的冲突和愤世嫉俗情绪,进而降低参与者对该组织的预期支持。政治意识形态和预先存在的问题立场是影响参与者对组织 CSA 声明反应的关键调节因素。我们进一步讨论了公共关系学者和实践者的理论和实践意义。
{"title":"Pushing hands and buttons: The effects of corporate social issue stance communication and online comment (in)civility on publics’ responses","authors":"Wenqing Zhao ,&nbsp;Xuerong Lu ,&nbsp;Yan Jin ,&nbsp;Toni G.L.A. van der Meer","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102488","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102488","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite increasing interest and involvement in corporate social advocacy (CSA) among companies, there are growing concerns among public relations scholars and practitioners regarding the undesired outcomes of CSA communication. To advance the knowledge of whether and how CSA communication might contribute to enhancing publics’ support for an organization, a 3 (organizational issue stance: pro-refugee immigration vs. against-refugee immigration vs. open dialogue) x 2 (social media comment civility: civil vs. uncivil) between-subjects online experiment was conducted with a U.S. adult sample (<em>N</em> = 1388). We found when the organization expressed its pro-refugee immigration stance (in contrast to advocating against refugee immigration or calling for open dialogue), greater support toward the organization was intended by participants. Advocating for open dialogue about refugee immigration resulted in undesired effects only when social media user comments following the CSA communication were uncivil, as it led to higher level of conflicted and cynical feelings sequentially, which in turn lowered participants’ intended support for the organization. Political ideology and pre-existing issue stance were key moderators influencing participants’ responses to the organization’s CSA statement. Theoretical and practical implications for public relations scholars and practitioners are further discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141607445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Misinformation or hard to tell? An eye-tracking study to investigate the effects of food crisis misinformation on social media engagement 误传还是难辨?一项眼动追踪研究,探究粮食危机错误信息对社交媒体参与度的影响
IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102483
Yen-I. Lee , Di Mu , Ying-Chia Hsu , Bartosz W. Wojdynski , Matt Binford

Visual misinformation about ongoing contaminated food crises poses a significant threat to organizational well-being and public health, particularly when people share incorrect images on social media. Corrective responses and highly credible media sources as effective strategies geared toward combating crisis misinformation. Extending Lewandowsky and colleagues’ (2012) corrective strategies for debunking misinformation, the concept of visual misinformation, cognitive process, and the theory of social sharing of emotion, this study aims to advance research on visual misinformation in public relations and crisis communication. A 2 (image veracity: incorrect vs. true) x 2 (corrective strategy: simple rebuttal vs. simple rebuttal + fact elaboration) x 2 (source credibility: high vs. low) between-subjects eye-tracking experiment was conducted to test the effects of these features on visual attention and intention to share. Additionally, we explored the mediation effects of emotional surprise and perceived crisis severity on sharing posts. Results showed visual cues (e.g., images and sources) and textual cues (e.g., corrective strategies) led to different allocations of visual attention. We found visual attention significantly mediated the effects of combined corrective messages on sharing. Additionally, feeling surprised also significantly mediated the effects of messages with low credible sources on sharing. This study provides insights into advancing crisis communication theory and offers evidence-based recommendations for health organizations and practitioners to better fight against food crisis misinformation.

有关当前受污染食品危机的视觉误导信息对组织福祉和公众健康构成了重大威胁,尤其是当人们在社交媒体上分享错误图片时。纠正对策和高度可信的媒体来源是应对危机误导信息的有效策略。本研究扩展了 Lewandowsky 及其同事(2012 年)揭穿错误信息的纠正策略、视觉错误信息的概念、认知过程和社会情感分享理论,旨在推进公共关系和危机传播中视觉错误信息的研究。我们进行了一个 2(图像真实性:错误 vs. 真实)x 2(纠正策略:简单反驳 vs. 简单反驳 + 事实阐述)x 2(来源可信度:高 vs. 低)的主体间眼动追踪实验,以检验这些特征对视觉注意力和分享意愿的影响。此外,我们还探讨了情感惊喜和感知危机严重性对分享帖子的中介效应。结果显示,视觉线索(如图片和来源)和文本线索(如纠正策略)导致了不同的视觉注意力分配。我们发现,视觉注意力在很大程度上调节了综合纠正信息对分享的影响。此外,惊讶感也能显著调节可信度低的信息对分享的影响。本研究为推进危机传播理论提供了见解,并为卫生机构和从业人员提供了基于证据的建议,以更好地应对食品危机误导。
{"title":"Misinformation or hard to tell? An eye-tracking study to investigate the effects of food crisis misinformation on social media engagement","authors":"Yen-I. Lee ,&nbsp;Di Mu ,&nbsp;Ying-Chia Hsu ,&nbsp;Bartosz W. Wojdynski ,&nbsp;Matt Binford","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102483","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Visual misinformation about ongoing contaminated food crises poses a significant threat to organizational well-being and public health, particularly when people share incorrect images on social media. Corrective responses and highly credible media sources as effective strategies geared toward combating crisis misinformation. Extending Lewandowsky and colleagues’ (2012) corrective strategies for debunking misinformation, the concept of visual misinformation, cognitive process, and the theory of social sharing of emotion, this study aims to advance research on visual misinformation in public relations and crisis communication. A 2 (image veracity: incorrect vs. true) x 2 (corrective strategy: simple rebuttal vs. simple rebuttal + fact elaboration) x 2 (source credibility: high vs. low) between-subjects eye-tracking experiment was conducted to test the effects of these features on visual attention and intention to share. Additionally, we explored the mediation effects of emotional surprise and perceived crisis severity on sharing posts. Results showed visual cues (e.g., images and sources) and textual cues (e.g., corrective strategies) led to different allocations of visual attention. We found visual attention significantly mediated the effects of combined corrective messages on sharing. Additionally, feeling surprised also significantly mediated the effects of messages with low credible sources on sharing. This study provides insights into advancing crisis communication theory and offers evidence-based recommendations for health organizations and practitioners to better fight against food crisis misinformation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141607444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multiple pathways to organizational legitimacy: Information visibility, organizational listening, and cross-sector partnerships 获得组织合法性的多种途径:信息可见度、组织倾听和跨部门伙伴关系
IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102484
Jiawei Sophia Fu , Rong Wang

Given the critical role of legitimacy in attracting key resources for organizational survival and growth, organizational and strategic communication research has long sought to understand the mechanisms essential in improving organizational legitimacy. Guided by stakeholder research and configurational thinking, we examine three interconnected communication mechanisms for relationship management in organizational legitimation: (a) information visibility, (b) organizational listening, and (c) cross-sector partnerships. Based on survey and archival data from 44 U.S. nonprofit organizations, we employed a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to identify the pathways to high or low organizational legitimacy. Our results reveal the combinations of these factors can complement or substitute for one another to explain legitimacy. Specifically, high pragmatic legitimacy requires effective listening to stakeholders and collaborating with government agencies. By contrast, in low pragmatic legitimacy, organizations are often hindered by limited capacity for information visibility, ineffective listening to stakeholders, and no collaboration with corporate partners. These results suggest theoretical contributions to stakeholder research in public relations and organizational and strategic communication scholarship, as well as practical implications for improving organizational legitimacy for mission-driven organizations.

鉴于合法性在吸引组织生存和发展所需的关键资源方面发挥着至关重要的作用,组织和战略传播研究长期以来一直致力于了解提高组织合法性的重要机制。在利益相关者研究和构型思维的指导下,我们研究了组织合法性关系管理中三个相互关联的传播机制:(a)信息可见性,(b)组织倾听,以及(c)跨部门伙伴关系。基于对 44 家美国非营利组织的调查和档案数据,我们采用了模糊集定性比较分析法来确定组织合法性高或低的途径。我们的结果表明,这些因素的组合可以相互补充或替代,从而解释合法性。具体来说,高务实合法性要求有效倾听利益相关者的意见并与政府机构合作。与此相反,在低实用主义合法性中,组织往往受到信息可见性能力有限、对利益相关者的倾听无效以及与企业合作伙伴缺乏合作等因素的阻碍。这些结果为公共关系、组织和战略传播学术中的利益相关者研究提供了理论上的贡献,同时也为改善使命驱动型组织的组织合法性提供了实践意义。
{"title":"Multiple pathways to organizational legitimacy: Information visibility, organizational listening, and cross-sector partnerships","authors":"Jiawei Sophia Fu ,&nbsp;Rong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102484","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given the critical role of legitimacy in attracting key resources for organizational survival and growth, organizational and strategic communication research has long sought to understand the mechanisms essential in improving organizational legitimacy. Guided by stakeholder research and configurational thinking, we examine three interconnected communication mechanisms for relationship management in organizational legitimation: (a) information visibility, (b) organizational listening, and (c) cross-sector partnerships. Based on survey and archival data from 44 U.S. nonprofit organizations, we employed a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to identify the pathways to high or low organizational legitimacy. Our results reveal the combinations of these factors can complement or substitute for one another to explain legitimacy. Specifically, high pragmatic legitimacy requires effective listening to stakeholders and collaborating with government agencies. By contrast, in low pragmatic legitimacy, organizations are often hindered by limited capacity for information visibility, ineffective listening to stakeholders, and no collaboration with corporate partners. These results suggest theoretical contributions to stakeholder research in public relations and organizational and strategic communication scholarship, as well as practical implications for improving organizational legitimacy for mission-driven organizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811124000638/pdfft?md5=7d703b760601c045f02f7609fec0348c&pid=1-s2.0-S0363811124000638-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141594427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analyzing media valence shifts: The association between a U.S. PR firm's engagement and Kenya's portrayal in U.S. media 分析媒体价值转变:美国公关公司的参与与肯尼亚在美国媒体中的形象之间的关联
IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102485
Dane Kiambi , Spiro Kiousis , Phillip Arceneaux

This study examines the association between the engagement of a U.S.-based PR firm by the Kenyan government and subsequent shifts in the tone of news coverage in four major U.S. media outlets. Through quantitative content analysis, the study identifies discernible shifts toward more positive reporting about Kenya during the period of PR firm involvement. By carefully delineating the association between PR engagement and changes in media portrayal without asserting direct causality, this research underscores the significance of strategic PR activities in influencing media narratives. The findings illustrate the intricate dynamics between international public relations practices and media framing, contributing valuable insights into the potential impact of PR efforts on national image cultivation in a global context.

本研究探讨了肯尼亚政府聘请美国公关公司与美国四大媒体新闻报道基调随之变化之间的关联。通过定量内容分析,研究发现在公关公司介入期间,对肯尼亚的报道出现了明显的积极转变。本研究在不断言直接因果关系的情况下,仔细划分了公关参与与媒体描述变化之间的关联,从而强调了战略性公关活动在影响媒体叙述方面的重要性。研究结果表明了国际公共关系实践与媒体框架之间错综复杂的动态关系,有助于深入了解公关活动在全球背景下对国家形象塑造的潜在影响。
{"title":"Analyzing media valence shifts: The association between a U.S. PR firm's engagement and Kenya's portrayal in U.S. media","authors":"Dane Kiambi ,&nbsp;Spiro Kiousis ,&nbsp;Phillip Arceneaux","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102485","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102485","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the association between the engagement of a U.S.-based PR firm by the Kenyan government and subsequent shifts in the tone of news coverage in four major U.S. media outlets. Through quantitative content analysis, the study identifies discernible shifts toward more positive reporting about Kenya during the period of PR firm involvement. By carefully delineating the association between PR engagement and changes in media portrayal without asserting direct causality, this research underscores the significance of strategic PR activities in influencing media narratives. The findings illustrate the intricate dynamics between international public relations practices and media framing, contributing valuable insights into the potential impact of PR efforts on national image cultivation in a global context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141594426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social media in public relations scholarship: A database-based systematic review of published articles from 2015 to 2020 公共关系学术中的社交媒体:基于数据库的 2015 年至 2020 年已发表文章的系统性回顾
IF 4.2 3区 管理学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102470
Hui Zhang

This systematic review examined social media research in public relations scholarship in English language between 2015 and 2020 by analyzing 380 articles from 143 journals sampled from multidisciplinary research databases. The analysis focused on research methods, data collection sources, type of social media being studied, use of theoretical frameworks, and differences between PR journals and non-PR journals. Key findings include: (a) PR journals and a few communication journals, which have often been sampled in the existing review studies, contributed to less than half (46.84 %) of the articles included, (b) significant differences between PR journals and non-PR journals in use of survey (X2 (1, N = 380) = 4.33, p = .04), and use of theoretical frameworks (X2 (1, N = 380) = 12.70, p < .001), (c) social media (N = 380, 36.6 %), together with platforms that are off social media but online (N = 380, 37.1 %), was the most frequently used data collection source, and (d) about half (N = 380, 47.2 %) of the articles belonged to the lower level on the extent of theoretical framework use continuum. Implications of these findings for future systematic review studies in public relations are discussed.

本系统性综述通过分析从多学科研究数据库中抽取的 143 种期刊中的 380 篇文章,考察了 2015 年至 2020 年间英语公共关系学术中的社交媒体研究。分析的重点是研究方法、数据收集来源、研究的社交媒体类型、理论框架的使用以及公共关系期刊与非公共关系期刊之间的差异。主要发现包括(a) 在现有的综述研究中,公关期刊和少数传播期刊经常被抽样调查,但这些期刊所收录的文章不到一半(46.84 %);(b) 公关期刊和非公关期刊在使用调查方法(X2 (1, N = 380) = 4.33, p = .04)和使用理论框架(X2 (1, N = 380) = 12.70,p <.001),(c) 社交媒体(N = 380,36.6%)以及非社交媒体但在线的平台(N = 380,37.1%)是最常用的数据收集来源,(d) 大约一半的文章(N = 380,47.2%)属于理论框架使用程度连续体中的较低水平。讨论了这些发现对未来公共关系系统性回顾研究的影响。
{"title":"Social media in public relations scholarship: A database-based systematic review of published articles from 2015 to 2020","authors":"Hui Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102470","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review examined social media research in public relations scholarship in English language between 2015 and 2020 by analyzing 380 articles from 143 journals sampled from multidisciplinary research databases. The analysis focused on research methods, data collection sources, type of social media being studied, use of theoretical frameworks, and differences between PR journals and non-PR journals. Key findings include: (a) PR journals and a few communication journals, which have often been sampled in the existing review studies, contributed to less than half (46.84 %) of the articles included, (b) significant differences between PR journals and non-PR journals in use of survey (<em>X</em><sup>2</sup> (1, <em>N</em> = 380) = 4.33, <em>p</em> = .04), and use of theoretical frameworks (<em>X</em><sup>2</sup> (1, <em>N</em> = 380) = 12.70, <em>p</em> &lt; .001), (c) social media (<em>N</em> = 380, 36.6 %), together with platforms that are off social media but online (<em>N</em> = 380, 37.1 %), was the most frequently used data collection source, and (d) about half (<em>N</em> = 380, 47.2 %) of the articles belonged to the lower level on the extent of theoretical framework use continuum. Implications of these findings for future systematic review studies in public relations are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141313158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is public relations a Tragedy of the Commons (TOTC) for the public sphere?The need of an ecology of content 公共关系是公共领域的公地悲剧(TOTC)吗?
IF 4.2 3区 管理学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102478
César García

This article argues that sustainability also appeals to the creation of PR content when organizations compete for attention. It starts with the idea that attention is a valuable resource in society and organizations compete for attention, increasing the quantity of content and messages and releasing them through multiple media channels. Content inflation, hyperbole, and exaggeration are the norm since competition is strong to attract attention. And, since attention is limited, this almost unlimited amount of content detracts society’s attention from more relevant collective and social problems. This article describes how contemporary public relations, especially after the implosion of social media, contributes to the Tragedy of the Commons (TOTC), providing relevant data about the impact of corporate content on journalism and social media. This article, appealing to the concept of sustainability and philosopher Byung Chul-Han’s ideas of the hypertrophy of storytelling, concludes that an ecology of PR would solve the problem and represent an inexpensive method of CSR for corporations, and that this “reduction of noise” would make the public sphere more viable.

本文认为,当组织争夺注意力时,可持续发展也会对公关内容的创作产生影响。文章的出发点是,注意力是社会的宝贵资源,各组织都在争夺注意力,增加内容和信息的数量,并通过多种媒体渠道发布。由于吸引注意力的竞争非常激烈,内容膨胀、夸张和渲染成为常态。而且,由于注意力是有限的,这种几乎无限量的内容分散了社会对更相关的集体和社会问题的注意力。本文描述了当代公共关系,尤其是社交媒体内爆之后,如何助长了公地悲剧(TOTC),提供了企业内容对新闻和社交媒体影响的相关数据。本文借鉴可持续发展的概念和哲学家 Byung Chul-Han 的 "讲故事的肥大 "思想,得出结论认为,公关生态学将解决这一问题,是企业履行企业社会责任的一种廉价方法,这种 "减少噪音 "的方法将使公共领域更有生命力。
{"title":"Is public relations a Tragedy of the Commons (TOTC) for the public sphere?The need of an ecology of content","authors":"César García","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102478","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article argues that sustainability also appeals to the creation of PR content when organizations compete for attention. It starts with the idea that attention is a valuable resource in society and organizations compete for attention, increasing the quantity of content and messages and releasing them through multiple media channels. Content inflation, hyperbole, and exaggeration are the norm since competition is strong to attract attention. And, since attention is limited, this almost unlimited amount of content detracts society’s attention from more relevant collective and social problems. This article describes how contemporary public relations, especially after the implosion of social media, contributes to the Tragedy of the Commons (TOTC), providing relevant data about the impact of corporate content on journalism and social media. This article, appealing to the concept of sustainability and philosopher Byung Chul-Han’s ideas of the hypertrophy of storytelling, concludes that an ecology of PR would solve the problem and represent an inexpensive method of CSR for corporations, and that this “reduction of noise” would make the public sphere more viable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141290561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping social networks: A qualitative approach to networked public relations scholarship 绘制社会网络图:网络化公共关系学术研究的定性方法
IF 4.2 3区 管理学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102477
Jeannette I. Iannacone

Social network analysis (SNA) has developed as a salient area of research within public relations, particularly for examining the structure, dynamics, and outcomes of interactions among social actors. Yet, SNA is both theory and method, the latter of which needs to be further explored in networked public relations research, especially given the predominance of the quantitative paradigm. Network research is not required to use quantitative methods as it should not be seen as prescriptive of one approach. This paper thereby proposes the integration of a qualitative approach to SNA by introducing a visual mapping approach for networked public relations scholarship, detailing a four-step process to design, conduct, and analysis. It further presents how an advancement of this methodological lens and technique connects to various parts of the wider public relations field.

社会网络分析(SNA)已经发展成为公共关系研究的一个重要领域,尤其是在研究社会行动者之然而,SNA 既是理论也是方法,后者需要在网络公共关系研究中进一步探索,尤其是在定量模网络研究不需要使用定量方法,因为它不应该被视为一种方法的规定。因此,本文提出了将定性方法与 SNA 相结合的建议,为网络公共关系学术研究引入了一种可视化制图方法,并详细介绍了设计、实施和分析的四个步骤。本文进一步介绍了这一方法论的进步是如何与公共关系领域的各个部分相联系的。
{"title":"Mapping social networks: A qualitative approach to networked public relations scholarship","authors":"Jeannette I. Iannacone","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102477","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social network analysis (SNA) has developed as a salient area of research within public relations, particularly for examining the structure, dynamics, and outcomes of interactions among social actors. Yet, SNA is both theory and method, the latter of which needs to be further explored in networked public relations research, especially given the predominance of the quantitative paradigm. Network research is not required to use quantitative methods as it should not be seen as prescriptive of one approach. This paper thereby proposes the integration of a qualitative approach to SNA by introducing a visual mapping approach for networked public relations scholarship, detailing a four-step process to design, conduct, and analysis. It further presents how an advancement of this methodological lens and technique connects to various parts of the wider public relations field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141290595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Public Relations Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1