首页 > 最新文献

Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour最新文献

英文 中文
Negotiating the bicycle path: A study of moped user stereotypes and behaviours in the Netherlands 协商自行车道:荷兰轻便摩托车使用者的定型观念和行为研究
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.015
Clara Glachant, Frauke Behrendt

Scholars and policymakers increasingly are presenting the moped as part of a transition to more sustainable modes. However, the question remains as to where moped users should ride–as they often compete for space with other sustainable modes such as cycling or walking. This study focuses on the Netherlands, known as a cycling paradise, where mopeds share the cycling infrastructure. This has sparked controversies about spatial conflicts between moped users and cyclists, especially since the emergence of e-moped rental systems in 2017. Drawing on mobility studies and social identity theory, this paper explores the stereotypes of moped users and their behaviours to understand the spatial complexities of a shift towards more micromobility in the Netherlands. By analysing interviews with moped users and how users are discussed in the press, the paper empirically maps stereotypes of the users of different mopeds i.e. (1) fuel-based and privately owned, (2) electric and privately owned, and (3) electric and rental, and their behaviour on the bicycle path. Our study shows how debates tend to focus on the behaviours of moped users and their interactions with cyclists on shared bicycle paths while the spatial domination of automobility remains unchallenged. This paper contributes to transport behaviour research on spatial conflicts and identities in the context of the rise of micromobility − a key pillar of transitions to more sustainable mobility, alongside other changes such as fleet electrification, reduction of car use, and increased public transport uptake. Micromobilities entail what was traditionally understood as active mobility or non-motorised transport, such as cycling, but also what is now often discussed under the umbrella of MaaS or (light) electric vehicles, such as motorised two-wheelers, and also 'hybrids' such as e-bikes, fatbikes or cargo bikes. This paper exemplifies how identities, stereotypes and behaviours are relevant for understanding interactions around these modes and debates, in the quest towards low-car urban transitions.

越来越多的学者和政策制定者将轻便摩托车视为向更可持续的交通方式过渡的一部分。然而,轻便摩托车用户应该在哪里骑行仍然是个问题,因为它们经常与自行车或步行等其他可持续交通方式争夺空间。本研究的重点是荷兰,众所周知,荷兰是自行车的天堂,在那里轻便摩托车共享自行车基础设施。这引发了轻便摩托车使用者与骑自行车者之间空间冲突的争议,尤其是在 2017 年电动轻便摩托车租赁系统出现之后。本文借鉴流动性研究和社会认同理论,探讨轻便摩托车用户的刻板印象及其行为,以了解荷兰向更多微型流动性转变的空间复杂性。通过分析对轻便摩托车用户的访谈以及媒体对轻便摩托车用户的讨论,本文以经验为基础,描绘了对不同轻便摩托车用户的刻板印象,即(1) 燃料轻便摩托车和私人拥有轻便摩托车,(2) 电动轻便摩托车和私人拥有轻便摩托车,(3) 电动轻便摩托车和租赁轻便摩托车,以及他们在自行车道上的行为。我们的研究表明,辩论的焦点往往集中在轻便摩托车使用者的行为以及他们在共享单车道上与骑车人的互动上,而汽车在空间上的主导地位仍未受到质疑。本文有助于在微型交通兴起的背景下,对空间冲突和身份认同进行交通行为研究。微型交通是向更可持续交通转型的关键支柱,与其他变革如车队电气化、减少汽车使用和提高公共交通使用率等并驾齐驱。微型交通包括传统意义上的主动交通或非机动交通,例如骑自行车,也包括现在经常在 MaaS 或(轻型)电动车范畴内讨论的电动两轮车,以及 "混合动力",例如电动自行车、肥胖自行车或货运自行车。本文举例说明了身份、刻板印象和行为如何与理解围绕这些模式的互动和辩论相关,从而实现城市的低碳转型。
{"title":"Negotiating the bicycle path: A study of moped user stereotypes and behaviours in the Netherlands","authors":"Clara Glachant,&nbsp;Frauke Behrendt","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scholars and policymakers increasingly are presenting the moped as part of a transition to more sustainable modes. However, the question remains as to where moped users should ride–as they often compete for space with other sustainable modes such as cycling or walking. This study focuses on the Netherlands, known as a cycling paradise, where mopeds share the cycling infrastructure. This has sparked controversies about spatial conflicts between moped users and cyclists, especially since the emergence of e-moped rental systems in 2017. Drawing on mobility studies and social identity theory, this paper explores the stereotypes of moped users and their behaviours to understand the spatial complexities of a shift towards more micromobility in the Netherlands. By analysing interviews with moped users and how users are discussed in the press, the paper empirically maps stereotypes of the users of different mopeds i.e. (1) fuel-based and privately owned, (2) electric and privately owned, and (3) electric and rental, and their behaviour on the bicycle path. Our study shows how debates tend to focus on the behaviours of moped users and their interactions with cyclists on shared bicycle paths while the spatial domination of automobility remains unchallenged. This paper contributes to transport behaviour research on spatial conflicts and identities in the context of the rise of micromobility − a key pillar of transitions to more sustainable mobility, alongside other changes such as fleet electrification, reduction of car use, and increased public transport uptake. Micromobilities entail what was traditionally understood as active mobility or non-motorised transport, such as cycling, but also what is now often discussed under the umbrella of MaaS or (light) electric vehicles, such as motorised two-wheelers, and also 'hybrids' such as e-bikes, fatbikes or cargo bikes. This paper exemplifies how identities, stereotypes and behaviours are relevant for understanding interactions around these modes and debates, in the quest towards low-car urban transitions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 301-320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002225/pdfft?md5=771e3a8cdfcfe351bb85b3e9bc47f5cf&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847824002225-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142230059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transparent internal human-machine interfaces in highly automated shuttles to support the communication of minimal risk maneuvers to the passengers 高度自动化班车内部透明的人机界面,支持向乘客传达风险最小的操作方法
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.006
Thorben Brandt, Marc Wilbrink, Michael Oehl

In Highly Automated Vehicles (HAVs) without operators on-board, user interaction with the vehicle automation plays an important role for a safe and inclusive use of these services. Especially when Minimal Risk Maneuvers (MRM) are performed by the system, passengers are faced with uncertain situations. A possibility to deepen passenger’s understanding and predictability of these systeḿs and reduce their uncertainties is to enhance automation transparency. However, literature shows a lack regarding enhancing system transparency of HAVs during MRMs. Therefore, we investigated the impact of “observability” and “reasoning” as transparency influencing factors. In an online study, participants evaluated multiple internal Human-Machine Interfaces (iHMI) as shuttle passengers. The presented iHMIs varied regarding their level of transparency by giving different information about what the vehicle’s “perception” and its “reasoning” is. Results show significant differences in the passengers’ understanding between different iHMI variants providing evidence that information regarding the “perception” and “reasoning” of HAVs enhance system transparency. Results of the study may provide first insights into passengers’ informational needs when using HAV. They highlight the potential benefits of system transparency when designing interfaces for HMIs of automated vehicles.

在没有车载操作员的高度自动驾驶汽车(HAV)中,用户与汽车自动化系统的交互对于安全、全面地使用这些服务起着重要作用。特别是当系统执行最小风险机动(MRM)时,乘客会面临不确定的情况。要加深乘客对这些系统的理解和可预测性,并减少其不确定性,一种可能性就是提高自动驾驶的透明度。然而,文献显示,在 MRM 期间,缺乏有关提高无人驾驶航空器系统透明度的研究。因此,我们研究了 "可观察性 "和 "推理 "作为透明度影响因素的影响。在一项在线研究中,参与者以班车乘客的身份对多个内部人机界面(iHMI)进行了评估。所展示的 iHMI 通过提供有关车辆 "感知 "和 "推理 "的不同信息,在透明度方面各不相同。研究结果表明,乘客对不同 iHMI 变体的理解存在明显差异,这证明有关无人驾驶汽车 "感知 "和 "推理 "的信息可提高系统的透明度。研究结果可为乘客在使用无人驾驶汽车时的信息需求提供初步见解。研究结果还强调了在设计自动驾驶汽车人机界面时系统透明度的潜在益处。
{"title":"Transparent internal human-machine interfaces in highly automated shuttles to support the communication of minimal risk maneuvers to the passengers","authors":"Thorben Brandt,&nbsp;Marc Wilbrink,&nbsp;Michael Oehl","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Highly Automated Vehicles (HAVs) without operators on-board, user interaction with the vehicle automation plays an important role for a safe and inclusive use of these services. Especially when Minimal Risk Maneuvers (MRM) are performed by the system, passengers are faced with uncertain situations. A possibility to deepen passenger’s understanding and predictability of these systeḿs and reduce their uncertainties is to enhance automation transparency. However, literature shows a lack regarding enhancing system transparency of HAVs during MRMs. Therefore, we investigated the impact of “observability” and “reasoning” as transparency influencing factors. In an online study, participants evaluated multiple internal Human-Machine Interfaces (iHMI) as shuttle passengers. The presented iHMIs varied regarding their level of transparency by giving different information about what the vehicle’s “perception” and its “reasoning” is. Results show significant differences in the passengers’ understanding between different iHMI variants providing evidence that information regarding the “perception” and “reasoning” of HAVs enhance system transparency. Results of the study may provide first insights into passengers’ informational needs when using HAV. They highlight the potential benefits of system transparency when designing interfaces for HMIs of automated vehicles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 275-287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002559/pdfft?md5=65aa6ab287c61b7c02692a084d6125cc&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847824002559-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the potential of a battery swapping method at refuel stations for electric vehicle: A case study of INDIA 调查电动汽车加油站电池交换方法的潜力:印度案例研究
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.005
Manivel Murugan , Sankaran Marisamynathan

Electric vehicles (EVs) are introduced to mitigate environmental problems and develop sustainable modes of transport across the globe. Researchers often report that the non-availability of charging infrastructure is the primary concern for EV adoption. The traditional plug-in EV charging method has a higher waiting time, discouraging users from adopting EVs. Many countries, including India, are promoting an alternative battery swapping method (BSM) for EV charging to reduce the waiting time. But the user preference and willingness to adopt BSM remain unexplored, especially in developing countries. The existing refuel stations are a potential location for developing charging infrastructure that provides the EV charging service and helps create awareness among users because of their wide visibility. Thus, this study aims to bridge the research gap by exploring the influential factors, user preferences, and willingness to use the BSM at refuel stations. For this purpose, 1013 samples were collected from road users who visited 51 refueling stations using the random sampling method in the twin cities of Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar. An integrated partial least squares-structural equation modelling with the artificial neural network method was adopted in this study. The study’s findings reveal that the development of public EV charging facilities at refuel stations significantly impacts the user’s willingness to shift to EVs. The convenience and cost-related motivating factors like a lesser waiting time compared to the plug-in charging method, reduced range anxiety, no concern about battery usage, reduced initial purchase cost of an EV, and comparatively lower maintenance costs significantly motivates user’s willingness to adopt BSM. Similarly, battery-related demotivating factors like the non-reliable range of the swapped battery, non-standard battery design in terms of type, size, capacity, and brand across the country, additional cost for leasing or renting the battery, and chances that EV batteries might be replaced with fake batteries concern BSM adoption.

电动汽车(EV)的引入旨在缓解环境问题,并在全球范围内发展可持续的交通模式。研究人员经常报告说,充电基础设施不到位是电动汽车应用的首要问题。传统的插电式电动汽车充电方式等待时间较长,阻碍了用户采用电动汽车。包括印度在内的许多国家正在推广电动汽车充电的替代电池交换法(BSM),以减少等待时间。但用户对 BSM 的偏好和采用意愿仍有待探索,尤其是在发展中国家。现有的加油站是开发充电基础设施的潜在地点,可提供电动汽车充电服务,并因其广泛的可见性而有助于提高用户的意识。因此,本研究旨在通过探索影响因素、用户偏好以及在加油站使用 BSM 的意愿来弥补研究空白。为此,研究人员采用随机抽样的方法,从艾哈迈达巴德和甘地纳加尔双城 51 个加油站的道路用户中收集了 1013 个样本。本研究采用了综合偏最小二乘法结构方程模型和人工神经网络方法。研究结果表明,加气站公共电动汽车充电设施的发展极大地影响了用户转向电动汽车的意愿。与插电式充电方式相比,等待时间更短、续航焦虑减少、无需担心电池使用问题、电动汽车初始购买成本降低、维护成本相对较低等与便利性和成本相关的激励因素极大地激发了用户采用 BSM 的意愿。同样,与电池相关的一些不利因素也会影响 BSM 的使用,如更换电池后的续航里程不可靠,全国各地的电池类型、大小、容量和品牌设计不统一,租赁或租用电池的额外费用,以及电动车电池有可能被替换成假冒电池等。
{"title":"Investigating the potential of a battery swapping method at refuel stations for electric vehicle: A case study of INDIA","authors":"Manivel Murugan ,&nbsp;Sankaran Marisamynathan","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electric vehicles (EVs) are introduced to mitigate environmental problems and develop sustainable modes of transport across the globe. Researchers often report that the non-availability of charging infrastructure is the primary concern for EV adoption. The traditional plug-in EV charging method has a higher waiting time, discouraging users from adopting EVs. Many countries, including India, are promoting an alternative battery swapping method (BSM) for EV charging to reduce the waiting time. But the user preference and willingness to adopt BSM remain unexplored, especially in developing countries. The existing refuel stations are a potential location for developing charging infrastructure that provides the EV charging service and helps create awareness among users because of their wide visibility. Thus, this study aims to bridge the research gap by exploring the influential factors, user preferences, and willingness to use the BSM at refuel stations. For this purpose, 1013 samples were collected from road users who visited 51 refueling stations using the random sampling method in the twin cities of Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar. An integrated partial least squares-structural equation modelling with the artificial neural network method was adopted in this study. The study’s findings reveal that the development of public EV charging facilities at refuel stations significantly impacts the user’s willingness to shift to EVs. The convenience and cost-related motivating factors like a lesser waiting time compared to the plug-in charging method, reduced range anxiety, no concern about battery usage, reduced initial purchase cost of an EV, and comparatively lower maintenance costs significantly motivates user’s willingness to adopt BSM. Similarly, battery-related demotivating factors like the non-reliable range of the swapped battery, non-standard battery design in terms of type, size, capacity, and brand across the country, additional cost for leasing or renting the battery, and chances that EV batteries might be replaced with fake batteries concern BSM adoption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 254-274"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence and predictors of driver distractions in Cyprus: An observational study 塞浦路斯驾驶员分心的发生率和预测因素:观察研究
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.035
Mark J.M. Sullman , Timo J. Lajunen , Ciaran Harte

Objective

Driver distractions are a significant contributor to road accidents and fatalities worldwide. The present research investigated the prevalence of observable driver distractions on both sides of Nicosia, as well as exploring the effect of drivers’ characteristics and time-related variables on their prevalence.

Methods

Roadside observations were conducted at eight randomly selected locations in the city of Nicosia, Cyprus. Four of these sites were located in the area of Nicosia controlled by the Republic of Cyprus, and the other four were in the area that is referred to as the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) by its administration.

Results

A total of 16,070 drivers were observed, with 8,948 being in the Republic of Cyprus (South) and 7,122 in the Turkish-controlled section of Nicosia (North). A slightly higher proportion of drivers were observed driving distracted in the South (28.0%) than was found in the northern part of the city (25.7%). The most commonly observed secondary tasks in the South were using headphones (9.2%), talking to a passenger (8.1%) and using a mobile 0.4%, 3.7% talking and 2.7% texting). In contrast, the most commonly observed secondary tasks in the North were talking to passengers (10.2%), wearing headphones (8.4%) and using a mobile 0.6% for talking and 2.5% for texting). Gender-related differences were found for a number of different distractions (i.e., talking to passengers, drinking, and handheld mobile phone conversations), and age emerged as a significant predictor for most secondary tasks, including talking to passengers, smoking, hands-free mobile phone use, handheld mobile phone use, texting/keying numbers, drinking and engagement in any type of distraction (all distractions combined). The overall pattern for age was that middle-aged and older drivers were less likely to be distracted than younger drivers.

Conclusions

A relatively high proportion of drivers on both sides of Nicosia were engaged in a secondary task while driving. These findings clearly indicate that younger drivers are more likely to drive distracted, which probably contributes to their higher crash rates.

目的驾驶员分心是造成全球道路交通事故和死亡的重要原因。本研究调查了尼科西亚两侧可观察到的驾驶员分心现象的发生率,并探讨了驾驶员特征和时间相关变量对其发生率的影响。方法在塞浦路斯尼科西亚市随机选择的八个地点进行了路边观察。结果共观察到 16,070 名司机,其中 8,948 名在塞浦路斯共和国(南区),7,122 名在尼科西亚土耳其控制区(北区)。据观察,南部地区分心驾驶的司机比例(28.0%)略高于北部地区(25.7%)。在南部地区最常见的次要任务是使用耳机(9.2%)、与乘客交谈(8.1%)和使用手机(0.4%、3.7% 交谈和 2.7% 发短信)。相比之下,在北方最常见的次要任务是与乘客交谈(10.2%)、戴耳机(8.4%)和使用手机(0.6%用于交谈,2.5%用于发短信)。在一些不同的分心行为(即与乘客交谈、饮酒和手持手机通话)中发现了与性别有关的差异,年龄是大多数次要任务的重要预测因素,包括与乘客交谈、吸烟、使用免提手机、使用手持手机、发短信/输入号码、饮酒和参与任何类型的分心行为(所有分心行为的总和)。就年龄而言,中老年驾驶员分心的可能性要低于年轻驾驶员。这些发现清楚地表明,年轻驾驶员更有可能在驾驶时分心,这可能是导致他们车祸发生率较高的原因。
{"title":"Prevalence and predictors of driver distractions in Cyprus: An observational study","authors":"Mark J.M. Sullman ,&nbsp;Timo J. Lajunen ,&nbsp;Ciaran Harte","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.035","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.035","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Driver distractions are a significant contributor to road accidents and fatalities worldwide. The present research investigated the prevalence of observable driver distractions on both sides of Nicosia, as well as exploring the effect of drivers’ characteristics and time-related variables on their prevalence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Roadside observations were conducted at eight randomly selected locations in the city of Nicosia, Cyprus. Four of these sites were located in the area of Nicosia controlled by the Republic of Cyprus, and the other four were in the area that is referred to as the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) by its administration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 16,070 drivers were observed, with 8,948 being in the Republic of Cyprus (South) and 7,122 in the Turkish-controlled section of Nicosia (North). A slightly higher proportion of drivers were observed driving distracted in the South (28.0%) than was found in the northern part of the city (25.7%). The most commonly observed secondary tasks in the South were using headphones (9.2%), talking to a passenger (8.1%) and using a mobile 0.4%, 3.7% talking and 2.7% texting). In contrast, the most commonly observed secondary tasks in the North were talking to passengers (10.2%), wearing headphones (8.4%) and using a mobile 0.6% for talking and 2.5% for texting). Gender-related differences were found for a number of different distractions (i.e., talking to passengers, drinking, and handheld mobile phone conversations), and age emerged as a significant predictor for most secondary tasks, including talking to passengers, smoking, hands-free mobile phone use, handheld mobile phone use, texting/keying numbers, drinking and engagement in any type of distraction (all distractions combined). The overall pattern for age was that middle-aged and older drivers were less likely to be distracted than younger drivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A relatively high proportion of drivers on both sides of Nicosia were engaged in a secondary task while driving. These findings clearly indicate that younger drivers are more likely to drive distracted, which probably contributes to their higher crash rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 224-237"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824002420/pdfft?md5=3d50d3f686dcae38cdbdf49ea86ad2d5&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847824002420-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142161513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Easy listening or driving distraction? The relationship between audiobook complexity level and driving performance on simple routes 轻松聆听还是分散驾驶注意力?有声读物复杂程度与简单路线驾驶表现之间的关系
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.002
Jessica M. Kespe, Lana M. Trick

Drivers engage in a variety of secondary activities while driving. Research suggests that many secondary tasks interfere with driving, making performance worse as compared to single-task driving, but a recent study suggests that in simple environments (low scenery and traffic) listening to an audiobook may actually benefit driving performance. Nonetheless, these effects may vary based on both the textual complexity of the audiobook and the working memory capacity of the driver. In this study, we used a driving simulator to compare single-task driving with that when the driver was listening to an audiobook (dual-task). We manipulated the complexity of the audiobook as measured by Lexile scores (a standard index of text difficulty). Licensed drivers did two 30-minute drives on simple roads, alternating between driving while listening to an audiobook (dual-task) or single-task driving. Drivers did one drive with the simple and the other with the complex audiobook (order counterbalanced). Listening to the simple audiobook improved driving performance as compared to single-task driving: braking response times to hazards were lower, as were steering and headway variability. Conversely, listening to the complex audiobook interfered with driving; braking times to hazards and steering variability were higher when drivers were listening to the audiobook than for single-task driving. Individual differences in working memory capacity as measured by the OSPAN (Operation Span) predicted how much listening to an audiobook benefitted performance, with the highest OSPAN scorers benefitting most, though these OSPAN-related differential benefits were restricted to reduced hazard response times while listening to the simple audiobook.

驾驶员在开车时会进行各种辅助活动。研究表明,许多次要任务会干扰驾驶,使驾驶表现比单一任务驾驶更差,但最近的一项研究表明,在简单的环境中(风景和交通状况较差),听有声读物实际上可能有利于驾驶表现。不过,这些效果可能会因有声读物的文字复杂程度和驾驶员的工作记忆能力而异。在本研究中,我们使用驾驶模拟器比较了单任务驾驶和听有声读物(双任务)时的驾驶。我们用 Lexile 分数(文字难度的标准指数)来衡量有声读物的复杂程度。持证驾驶员在简单的道路上进行了两次 30 分钟的驾驶,交替进行边听有声读物边驾驶(双任务)或单任务驾驶。驾驶员一次驾驶时听简单的有声读物,另一次驾驶时听复杂的有声读物(顺序平衡)。与单任务驾驶相比,听简单有声读物可提高驾驶性能:对危险的制动反应时间更短,转向和车头移动的变化也更小。相反,听复杂的有声读物则会干扰驾驶;与单一任务驾驶相比,驾驶员在听有声读物时对危险的制动反应时间和转向变异性更高。通过 OSPAN(操作跨度)测量的工作记忆能力的个体差异预示了听有声读物对驾驶表现的益处,OSPAN 得分最高的人受益最大,尽管这些与 OSPAN 相关的差异益处仅限于在听简单有声读物时减少危险反应时间。
{"title":"Easy listening or driving distraction? The relationship between audiobook complexity level and driving performance on simple routes","authors":"Jessica M. Kespe,&nbsp;Lana M. Trick","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drivers engage in a variety of secondary activities while driving. Research suggests that many secondary tasks interfere with driving, making performance worse as compared to single-task driving, but a recent study suggests that in simple environments (low scenery and traffic) listening to an audiobook may actually benefit driving performance. Nonetheless, these effects may vary based on both the textual complexity of the audiobook and the working memory capacity of the driver. In this study, we used a driving simulator to compare single-task driving with that when the driver was listening to an audiobook (dual-task). We manipulated the complexity of the audiobook as measured by Lexile scores (a standard index of text difficulty). Licensed drivers did two 30-minute drives on simple roads, alternating between driving while listening to an audiobook (dual-task) or single-task driving. Drivers did one drive with the simple and the other with the complex audiobook (order counterbalanced). Listening to the simple audiobook improved driving performance as compared to single-task driving: braking response times to hazards were lower, as were steering and headway variability. Conversely, listening to the complex audiobook interfered with driving; braking times to hazards and steering variability were higher when drivers were listening to the audiobook than for single-task driving. Individual differences in working memory capacity as measured by the <em>OSPAN</em> (Operation Span) predicted how much listening to an audiobook benefitted performance, with the highest <em>OSPAN</em> scorers benefitting most, though these <em>OSPAN</em>-related differential benefits were restricted to reduced hazard response times while listening to the simple audiobook.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 238-253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142161514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating pedestrians’ red light running intentions at urban intersections in different traffic Environments: A scenario-based analysis guided by theoretical frameworks 调查不同交通环境下城市十字路口行人的闯红灯意图:以理论框架为指导的情景分析
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.003
Zeinab Karami , Sina Rejali , Kayvan Aghabayk

Pedestrian risky behaviors are one of the contributing factors to crashes involving pedestrians. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehend the mechanisms by which pedestrians interact with many influential components in the traffic environment. This study aimed to evaluate pedestrians’ red light running intentions and related factors under different traffic flow scenarios, including straight traffic flow, right-turning traffic flow, and left-turning traffic flow. A theoretical approach based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the prototype willingness model (PWM) was employed. Data were collected from an online survey of 2250 participants in Tehran, Iran. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to identify the significant factors that explain intentions. All models successfully explained the behavioral intention for red light running violation; however, the findings revealed that the integrated model was the best-performing model to represent violation and, thus, was selected for interpreting the results and drawing relevant conclusions. Different traffic flow scenarios had varied effects on violation intentions for individual characteristics and model constructs. Previous crash experiences and driving-related background variables emerged to impact pedestrian violation intention across three scenarios. The findings also suggested that the rational constructs (attitude, perceived behavioral control, and facilitating conditions) had a more robust impact on violation intention compared to reactive constructs (prototype similarity, prototype favorability), with facilitating conditions being the strongest predictor of the model, followed by attitudes toward violation as a significant predictor of intention for red light violation. According to the results, the mechanism of risk-taking varies depending on the direction of the traffic flow. Higher risk was associated with the violation at the intersections with straight traffic flow compared to the intersections with turning traffic flow. Based on the findings of this study, several implications, including interventions focusing on individuals’ transportation safety attitudes, countermeasures to increase the risk perception of pedestrians toward turning vehicles, and countermeasures regarding the use of mobile phones while walking for the context of this study were proposed.

行人的危险行为是造成行人碰撞事故的因素之一。因此,理解行人与交通环境中许多影响因素的相互作用机制至关重要。本研究旨在评估行人在不同交通流场景下的闯红灯意图及相关因素,包括直行交通流、右转交通流和左转交通流。研究采用了基于计划行为理论(TPB)和原型意愿模型(PWM)的理论方法。数据收集自对伊朗德黑兰 2250 名参与者的在线调查。研究采用结构方程模型(SEM)来确定解释意向的重要因素。所有模型都成功地解释了闯红灯的行为意向;然而,研究结果表明,综合模型是表现闯红灯行为意向的最佳模型,因此被选为解释结果和得出相关结论的模型。不同的交通流情景对个人特征和模型构建的违章意向有不同的影响。在三种情景中,以前的撞车经历和与驾驶相关的背景变量对行人违章意向产生了影响。研究结果还表明,与被动建构(原型相似性、原型好感度)相比,理性建构(态度、感知行为控制和便利条件)对违章意向的影响更强,其中便利条件对模型的预测作用最强,其次是违章态度对闯红灯意向的显著预测作用。研究结果表明,交通流方向不同,风险承担的机制也不同。与转弯交通流交叉口相比,直行交通流交叉口的违规风险更高。根据这项研究的结果,提出了几项启示,包括针对个人交通安全态度的干预措施、提高行人对转弯车辆风险感知的对策,以及针对本研究中步行时使用手机的对策。
{"title":"Investigating pedestrians’ red light running intentions at urban intersections in different traffic Environments: A scenario-based analysis guided by theoretical frameworks","authors":"Zeinab Karami ,&nbsp;Sina Rejali ,&nbsp;Kayvan Aghabayk","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pedestrian risky behaviors are one of the contributing factors to crashes involving pedestrians. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehend the mechanisms by which pedestrians interact with many influential components in the traffic environment. This study aimed to evaluate pedestrians’ red light running intentions and related factors under different traffic flow scenarios, including straight traffic flow, right-turning traffic flow, and left-turning traffic flow. A theoretical approach based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the prototype willingness model (PWM) was employed. Data were collected from an online survey of 2250 participants in Tehran, Iran. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to identify the significant factors that explain intentions. All models successfully explained the behavioral intention for red light running violation; however, the findings revealed that the integrated model was the best-performing model to represent violation and, thus, was selected for interpreting the results and drawing relevant conclusions. Different traffic flow scenarios had varied effects on violation intentions for individual characteristics and model constructs. Previous crash experiences and driving-related background variables emerged to impact pedestrian violation intention across three scenarios. The findings also suggested that the rational constructs (attitude, perceived behavioral control, and facilitating conditions) had a more robust impact on violation intention compared to reactive constructs (prototype similarity, prototype favorability), with facilitating conditions being the strongest predictor of the model, followed by attitudes toward violation as a significant predictor of intention for red light violation. According to the results, the mechanism of risk-taking varies depending on the direction of the traffic flow. Higher risk was associated with the violation at the intersections with straight traffic flow compared to the intersections with turning traffic flow. Based on the findings of this study, several implications, including interventions focusing on individuals’ transportation safety attitudes, countermeasures to increase the risk perception of pedestrians toward turning vehicles, and countermeasures regarding the use of mobile phones while walking for the context of this study were proposed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 196-223"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142161512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors influencing the perception of safety for pedestrians and cyclists through interactions with automated vehicles in shared spaces 影响行人和骑自行车者通过在共享空间与自动驾驶汽车互动而获得安全感的因素
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.032
Sarah Brill , Ashim Kumar Debnath , William Payre , Ben Horan , Stewart Birrell

Research has demonstrated the benefits of external human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) in increasing vulnerable road users’ (VRU) feeling of safety in interactions with automated vehicles (AVs). However, two key gaps exist in the literature. First, existing studies examined AV-VRU communication aspects in the context of conventional roads with traffic controls, but not for shared spaces where VRU-AV interaction is reliant on communication between the two parties. Second, limited knowledge is available on the differences between cyclists and pedestrians when interacting with AV. This paper aims to address these gaps through an online questionnaire among 254 cyclists and pedestrians in Australia and the UK. Perceived safety was measured in terms of willingness to cross in front of an AV, feeling of security, and feeling of relaxation. Results from a three-stage least square regression analysis identified differences in the factors for pedestrians and cyclists. Pedestrians that were male, over the age of 35, not regular cyclists, or residents of the UK reported lower feelings of safety, relaxation, and willingness to cross than their counterparts. Similar results were found cyclists who are older than 45 years, and UK residents compared to other cyclist participants. Both pedestrians and cyclists reported more willingness to cross and higher feelings of security and relaxation when an eHMI was present. These findings indicate that for effective use and understanding of eHMIs targeted interventions are needed to address the specific concerns of different demographic groups, as identified in this research. By increasing public understanding and acceptance of AVs – as well as eHMIs – across all demographic groups, researchers can promote a smooth integration of these technologies into shared spaces.

研究表明,外部人机交互界面(eHMIs)可以提高易受伤害的道路使用者(VRU)在与自动驾驶汽车(AVs)互动时的安全感。然而,文献中还存在两大空白。首先,现有研究是在有交通管制的传统道路上研究自动驾驶汽车与易受伤害的道路使用者(VRU)之间的沟通问题,而不是在自动驾驶汽车与易受伤害的道路使用者(VRU)之间的互动依赖于双方沟通的共享空间中进行研究。其次,关于骑车人和行人在与 AV 交互时的差异的知识有限。本文旨在通过对澳大利亚和英国的 254 名骑车人和行人进行在线问卷调查来弥补这些不足。对安全感的测量包括是否愿意在自动驾驶汽车前横穿马路、安全感和放松感。三阶段最小二乘法回归分析的结果确定了行人和骑自行车者的因素差异。男性、35 岁以上、不经常骑自行车或居住在英国的行人的安全感、放松感和横穿马路的意愿均低于同龄人。与其他骑车参与者相比,45 岁以上的骑车者和英国居民也发现了类似的结果。行人和骑自行车的人都表示,如果有电子人机界面,他们更愿意横穿马路,安全感和放松感也更高。这些研究结果表明,为了有效使用和理解电子行人安全界面,需要采取有针对性的干预措施,以解决本研究中发现的不同人口群体的具体问题。通过提高所有人口群体对自动驾驶汽车和电子人机界面的理解和接受程度,研究人员可以促进这些技术与共享空间的顺利融合。
{"title":"Factors influencing the perception of safety for pedestrians and cyclists through interactions with automated vehicles in shared spaces","authors":"Sarah Brill ,&nbsp;Ashim Kumar Debnath ,&nbsp;William Payre ,&nbsp;Ben Horan ,&nbsp;Stewart Birrell","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.032","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research has demonstrated the benefits of external human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) in increasing vulnerable road users’ (VRU) feeling of safety in interactions with automated vehicles (AVs). However, two key gaps exist in the literature. First, existing studies examined AV-VRU communication aspects in the context of conventional roads with traffic controls, but not for shared spaces where VRU-AV interaction is reliant on communication between the two parties. Second, limited knowledge is available on the differences between cyclists and pedestrians when interacting with AV. This paper aims to address these gaps through an online questionnaire among 254 cyclists and pedestrians in Australia and the UK. Perceived safety was measured in terms of willingness to cross in front of an AV, feeling of security, and feeling of relaxation. Results from a three-stage least square regression analysis identified differences in the factors for pedestrians and cyclists. Pedestrians that were male, over the age of 35, not regular cyclists, or residents of the UK reported lower feelings of safety, relaxation, and willingness to cross than their counterparts. Similar results were found cyclists who are older than 45 years, and UK residents compared to other cyclist participants. Both pedestrians and cyclists reported more willingness to cross and higher feelings of security and relaxation when an eHMI was present. These findings indicate that for effective use and understanding of eHMIs targeted interventions are needed to address the specific concerns of different demographic groups, as identified in this research. By increasing public understanding and acceptance of AVs – as well as eHMIs – across all demographic groups, researchers can promote a smooth integration of these technologies into shared spaces.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 181-195"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142149982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Pedestrian Interactions in Intersections on the Three Levels of Drivers’ Situation Awareness 交叉路口中的行人互动对驾驶员三个层次情景意识的影响
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.023
Sami Park , Yilun Xing , Kumar Akash , Teruhisa Misu , Shashank Mehrotra , Linda Ng Boyle

Evaluating drivers’ situation awareness (SA) is important in the implementation of alert prioritization. This study investigates the relationship between driving performance measures (speed, acceleration and brake usage, steering wheel and lane deviation), pedestrian interaction (location, direction and motion), and driver SA. To achieve this, a controlled study was conducted with 56 participants using a Balanced Incomplete Block Design, where each participant drove 18 out of 48 possible intersections in a driving simulator environment. The Situational Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) method was used to assess drivers’ SA. Mixed effects logit models were developed to examine the different SA Levels (perception, comprehension, projection). The driving performance measures were aggregated across three time windows (1, 3, and 5 s). The findings show significant contributions from both driving performance measures and pedestrian interactions in predicting driver SA. More specifically, a one-second time window was useful for predicting pedestrian direction and a three-second time window was best for predicting pedestrian location and intention to cross. The results indicate the importance of considering different time windows for predicting various levels of driver SA responses. These findings offer insights into factors to be considered in driver SA predictive models.

评估驾驶员的态势感知(SA)对于实施警报优先排序非常重要。本研究调查了驾驶性能指标(速度、加速和制动使用、方向盘和车道偏离)、行人互动(位置、方向和运动)与驾驶员态势感知之间的关系。为此,我们采用平衡不完全街区设计对 56 名参与者进行了对照研究,每位参与者在驾驶模拟器环境中驾驶了 48 个可能交叉路口中的 18 个。研究采用了态势感知全球评估技术(SAGAT)方法来评估驾驶员的态势感知能力。建立了混合效应 logit 模型,以检查不同的 SA 级别(感知、理解、预测)。驾驶性能指标在三个时间窗口(1、3 和 5 秒)内汇总。研究结果表明,驾驶性能指标和行人相互作用在预测驾驶员 SA 方面都有重要作用。更具体地说,1 秒钟的时间窗口有助于预测行人方向,而 3 秒钟的时间窗口最适合预测行人位置和过马路的意图。结果表明,考虑不同的时间窗对于预测不同程度的驾驶员 SA 反应非常重要。这些发现为驾驶员 SA 预测模型中需要考虑的因素提供了启示。
{"title":"The Impact of Pedestrian Interactions in Intersections on the Three Levels of Drivers’ Situation Awareness","authors":"Sami Park ,&nbsp;Yilun Xing ,&nbsp;Kumar Akash ,&nbsp;Teruhisa Misu ,&nbsp;Shashank Mehrotra ,&nbsp;Linda Ng Boyle","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evaluating drivers’ situation awareness (SA) is important in the implementation of alert prioritization. This study investigates the relationship between driving performance measures (speed, acceleration and brake usage, steering wheel and lane deviation), pedestrian interaction (location, direction and motion), and driver SA. To achieve this, a controlled study was conducted with 56 participants using a Balanced Incomplete Block Design, where each participant drove 18 out of 48 possible intersections in a driving simulator environment. The Situational Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) method was used to assess drivers’ SA. Mixed effects logit models were developed to examine the different SA Levels (perception, comprehension, projection). The driving performance measures were aggregated across three time windows (1, 3, and 5 s). The findings show significant contributions from both driving performance measures and pedestrian interactions in predicting driver SA. More specifically, a one-second time window was useful for predicting pedestrian direction and a three-second time window was best for predicting pedestrian location and intention to cross. The results indicate the importance of considering different time windows for predicting various levels of driver SA responses. These findings offer insights into factors to be considered in driver SA predictive models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 167-180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142149981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How long the effect of take-over conditions Lasts? a survival analysis of Commercial Motor vehicle drivers’ reaction time and driving behavior in Level 4 of automated vehicles 自动驾驶汽车第 4 级条件下商用汽车驾驶员反应时间和驾驶行为的存活分析
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.033
Ali Riahi Samani, Sabyasachee Mishra

The transition from automated to manual driving, referred as to Take-over conditions (TOC), in highly automated vehicles (e.g., SAE Level 4 or higher) is a subject of great interest to driver’s safety researchers, considering advancement of automotive technologies. While the literature has focused primarily on the post-take-over behavior of passenger car drivers, assessing different aspects of Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) drivers’ post-take-over behavior has received less attention, although it is anticipated that CMVs will be the first to vastly adopt highly automated technology. This paper aims to address the question of how long the effect of TOC lasts in CMV drivers and how automated operation duration before TOC, repeated TOC, and driver’s factors (i.e., age, gender, education, and driving history) affect the duration of TOC’s effect. To accomplish this, we designed a 40-minute experiment on a driving simulator and compared participants’ responses to TOC with continuous manual driving to first, assess significant changes in driving behavior indices (e.g., acceleration, velocity, and headway) in different time intervals and second, evaluate the survival patterns of unsafe behaviors (e.g., hard brakes, sharp turns, and speeding) over time. Multilevel Mixed-effect Linear Models and Multilevel Mixed-effect Parametric Survival Models are incorporated to assess the duration of TOC’s effects. Results showed that the first 10 s of TOC carries the most significant driving behavior changes while the probability of observing unsafe behaviors reduces significantly after 20 s. The results indicated that the effect of TOC lasts longer in long-automated operations, old drivers, and drivers with bad driving history, while repeated TOCs, showed positive effects on mediating the effect of this transition. The findings of this paper offer valuable insights to automotive companies and transportation planners on the nature of Take-over conditions.

考虑到汽车技术的发展,高度自动驾驶车辆(如 SAE 4 级或更高级别)从自动驾驶到手动驾驶的过渡,即接管条件(TOC),是驾驶员安全研究人员非常感兴趣的课题。尽管文献主要关注乘用车驾驶员的超车后行为,但对商用车(CMV)驾驶员不同方面的超车后行为评估却关注较少,尽管预计商用车将率先大量采用高度自动化技术。本文旨在探讨 TOC 对 CMV 驾驶员的影响会持续多久,以及 TOC 前的自动驾驶持续时间、重复 TOC 和驾驶员因素(即年龄、性别、教育程度和驾驶历史)对 TOC 影响持续时间的影响。为此,我们在驾驶模拟器上设计了一个 40 分钟的实验,将参与者对 TOC 的反应与连续手动驾驶进行比较,首先评估不同时间间隔内驾驶行为指数(如加速度、速度和车头距离)的显著变化,其次评估不安全行为(如急刹车、急转弯和超速)随时间推移的存续模式。采用多层次混合效应线性模型和多层次混合效应参数生存模型来评估 TOC 效果的持续时间。结果表明,TOC 对长期自动驾驶、年长驾驶员和有不良驾驶记录的驾驶员的影响持续时间更长,而重复 TOC 对调解这一转变的影响有积极作用。本文的研究结果为汽车公司和交通规划人员了解接管条件的性质提供了有价值的见解。
{"title":"How long the effect of take-over conditions Lasts? a survival analysis of Commercial Motor vehicle drivers’ reaction time and driving behavior in Level 4 of automated vehicles","authors":"Ali Riahi Samani,&nbsp;Sabyasachee Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.033","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.033","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The transition from automated to manual driving, referred as to Take-over conditions (TOC), in highly automated vehicles (e.g., SAE Level 4 or higher) is a subject of great interest to driver’s safety researchers, considering advancement of automotive technologies. While the literature has focused primarily on the post-take-over behavior of passenger car drivers, assessing different aspects of Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) drivers’ post-take-over behavior has received less attention, although it is anticipated that CMVs will be the first to vastly adopt highly automated technology. This paper aims to address the question of how long the effect of TOC lasts in CMV drivers and how automated operation duration before TOC, repeated TOC, and driver’s factors (i.e., age, gender, education, and driving history) affect the duration of TOC’s effect. To accomplish this, we designed a 40-minute experiment on a driving simulator and compared participants’ responses to TOC with continuous manual driving to first, assess significant changes in driving behavior indices (e.g., acceleration, velocity, and headway) in different time intervals and second, evaluate the survival patterns of unsafe behaviors (e.g., hard brakes, sharp turns, and speeding) over time. Multilevel Mixed-effect Linear Models and Multilevel Mixed-effect Parametric Survival Models are incorporated to assess the duration of TOC’s effects. Results showed that the first 10 s of TOC carries the most significant driving behavior changes while the probability of observing unsafe behaviors reduces significantly after 20 s. The results indicated that the effect of TOC lasts longer in long-automated operations, old drivers, and drivers with bad driving history, while repeated TOCs, showed positive effects on mediating the effect of this transition. The findings of this paper offer valuable insights to automotive companies and transportation planners on the nature of Take-over conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 149-166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142149955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What limits improper bike-sharing parking most: Penalties or incentives? Findings from an online behavioral experiment 什么最能限制共享单车的不当停放?惩罚还是激励?在线行为实验结果
IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.001
Hongyun Si , Jiaxuan Liang , Jintao Ke , Long Cheng , Jonas De Vos

Electronic fences are now used to regulate the parking behavior of bike-sharing users, but the issue of improper parking within such fenced areas has not been resolved. Based on the theories of perceived value and perceived risk, this study used online behavioral experiments to simulate a scenario of users parking shared bicycles. By considering three factors — economic incentives, punitive measures, and travel scenarios — this study examined variations in users’ willingness to standardize the parking of shared bicycles. Data from 809 valid questionnaires were collected and empirically analyzed using bootstrap and regression analyses. According to the results, both economic incentives and penalties significantly enhanced users’ willingness to standardize the parking of shared bicycles, and the impact of penalties was slightly stronger than that of incentives. Perceived value played a mediating role between economic incentives and users’ willingness to properly park shared bicycles. Perceived risk acted as a mediator between punitive measures and the regulated parking intention of users. Travel scenarios served as a moderating factor between penalties and users’ willingness to park shared bicycles in a compliant manner, with the users’ compliance willingness in non-commuting travel scenarios significantly surpassing that in commuting contexts. These findings enrich the knowledge of sustainable usage behaviors among bike-sharing users, providing insights for bike-sharing companies to manage user behavior. Based on these results, several policy recommendations aimed at guiding governments and companies in regulating electronic fences and user parking behaviors are proposed.

目前,电子围栏已被用于规范共享单车用户的停放行为,但在此类围栏区域内乱停乱放的问题尚未得到解决。基于感知价值和感知风险理论,本研究利用在线行为实验模拟了用户停放共享单车的场景。通过考虑经济激励、惩罚措施和出行场景这三个因素,本研究考察了用户对规范停放共享单车意愿的变化。研究收集了 809 份有效问卷的数据,并利用引导分析和回归分析进行了实证分析。结果显示,经济激励和惩罚措施都能显著增强用户规范停放共享单车的意愿,且惩罚措施的影响略强于激励措施。感知价值在经济激励与用户正确停放共享单车的意愿之间起到了中介作用。在惩罚措施和用户规范停放意愿之间,感知风险起着中介作用。出行场景是惩罚措施与用户合规停放共享单车意愿之间的调节因素,用户在非通勤出行场景下的合规停放意愿明显高于通勤场景下的合规停放意愿。这些发现丰富了共享单车用户可持续使用行为的知识,为共享单车公司管理用户行为提供了启示。基于这些结果,我们提出了一些政策建议,旨在指导政府和企业规范电子围栏和用户停放行为。
{"title":"What limits improper bike-sharing parking most: Penalties or incentives? Findings from an online behavioral experiment","authors":"Hongyun Si ,&nbsp;Jiaxuan Liang ,&nbsp;Jintao Ke ,&nbsp;Long Cheng ,&nbsp;Jonas De Vos","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electronic fences are now used to regulate the parking behavior of bike-sharing users, but the issue of improper parking within such fenced areas has not been resolved. Based on the theories of perceived value and perceived risk, this study used online behavioral experiments to simulate a scenario of users parking shared bicycles. By considering three factors — economic incentives, punitive measures, and travel scenarios — this study examined variations in users’ willingness to standardize the parking of shared bicycles. Data from 809 valid questionnaires were collected and empirically analyzed using bootstrap and regression analyses. According to the results, both economic incentives and penalties significantly enhanced users’ willingness to standardize the parking of shared bicycles, and the impact of penalties was slightly stronger than that of incentives. Perceived value played a mediating role between economic incentives and users’ willingness to properly park shared bicycles. Perceived risk acted as a mediator between punitive measures and the regulated parking intention of users. Travel scenarios served as a moderating factor between penalties and users’ willingness to park shared bicycles in a compliant manner, with the users’ compliance willingness in non-commuting travel scenarios significantly surpassing that in commuting contexts. These findings enrich the knowledge of sustainable usage behaviors among bike-sharing users, providing insights for bike-sharing companies to manage user behavior. Based on these results, several policy recommendations aimed at guiding governments and companies in regulating electronic fences and user parking behaviors are proposed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 133-148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142149954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1