This paper explores how seemingly mundane objects—benches, lampposts, phone boxes, bus shelters—became sites of political significance in London, and by extension in Britain's cities, following the neoliberal turn of 1979. It traces the shift from post-war democratic design governance, when street furniture was actively debated and designed as a civic good, to an era marked by privatization, depoliticization, and the erosion of public oversight. Drawing on a historical-interpretive case study, the study analyzes policy documents, design debates, archival material, and media coverage to investigate how neoliberal urban reforms under Margaret Thatcher dismantled institutional frameworks that once supported public involvement in shaping the everyday urban landscape. However, rather than disappearing, public engagement with street furniture shifted into the realm of informal practice—seen in acts of appropriation, subversion, and local customization. The article integrates Henri Lefebvre's “right to the city,” Michel de Certeau's theory of everyday tactics, and affordance theory to frame street furniture as an “in-between” architecture of urban politics—symbolically and materially reflecting the tensions between state, market, and citizen. By foregrounding these overlooked micro-political struggles, the paper argues for a renewed recognition of small urban objects as critical to democratic space-making. It concludes with implications for inclusive urban governance and participatory design in an age of market-led city development.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
