首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Predicting that birds of a feather will flock together: Expectations of homophily for others but not the self 预测物以类聚:对他人而非自己的同质性的期望
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-07-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104784
Miriam E. Schwyck, Carolyn Parkinson
Similarity among friends – or other socially connected individuals – is a ubiquitous characteristic of social networks. There are several, often simultaneous, mechanisms (e.g., social influence, shared environments) through which such links between social connection and similarity arise, including homophily, or the tendency for similar people to attract one another. While past research has found that people use similarity heuristics to structure their mental representations of social networks (predicting that friends are likely to be similar to each other), it is unknown if people assume such similarity arises through homophily, specifically. Here, we tested if people assume that homophily will shape their own and others' future friendships. Participants (NTotal = 560) learned how (i) trustworthy and (ii) trusting various partners were through repeated trust games. Participants predicted which partners would become friends with one another and which partners they would become friends with themselves if they were to meet in person. Across two studies and both trait measures, we found that participants were significantly more likely to predict that partners who behaved similarly would later become friends compared to those who behaved dissimilarly. Interestingly, we found that participants were significantly more likely to predict that they would become friends with highly trustworthy and highly trusting partners compared to highly untrustworthy or highly untrusting partners, regardless of their own behavioral tendencies or even their own self-perceptions. These findings suggest that for trust-related traits, people assume homophily will govern others' relationships but not necessarily their own. Such expectations likely shape how people approach or foster new friendships for themselves and between others.
朋友之间或其他社会联系个体之间的相似性是社交网络中普遍存在的特征。社会联系和相似性之间的联系,包括同质性,或相似的人相互吸引的倾向,往往是同时存在的几种机制(例如,社会影响、共享环境)。虽然过去的研究发现,人们使用相似性启发式来构建他们对社交网络的心理表征(预测朋友可能彼此相似),但人们是否认为这种相似性是通过同质性产生的,这是未知的。在这里,我们测试了人们是否认为同性恋会影响他们自己和他人未来的友谊。参与者(NTotal = 560)通过重复的信任游戏了解到(i)信任和(ii)信任不同的伙伴。参与者预测,如果他们亲自见面,哪些伙伴会彼此成为朋友,哪些伙伴会与自己成为朋友。在两项研究和两项特征测量中,我们发现,与那些行为不同的伴侣相比,参与者更有可能预测行为相似的伴侣后来会成为朋友。有趣的是,我们发现,与高度不可信或高度不可信的伙伴相比,参与者更有可能预测他们会与高度值得信赖和高度信任的伙伴成为朋友,而不管他们自己的行为倾向,甚至是他们自己的自我认知。这些发现表明,对于与信任相关的特征,人们认为同质性会影响他人的关系,但不一定影响自己的关系。这种期望可能会影响人们如何接近或培养自己和他人之间的新友谊。
{"title":"Predicting that birds of a feather will flock together: Expectations of homophily for others but not the self","authors":"Miriam E. Schwyck,&nbsp;Carolyn Parkinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104784","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104784","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Similarity among friends – or other socially connected individuals – is a ubiquitous characteristic of social networks. There are several, often simultaneous, mechanisms (e.g., social influence, shared environments) through which such links between social connection and similarity arise, including homophily, or the tendency for similar people to attract one another. While past research has found that people use similarity heuristics to structure their mental representations of social networks (predicting that friends are likely to be similar to each other), it is unknown if people assume such similarity arises through homophily, specifically. Here, we tested if people assume that homophily will shape their own and others' future friendships. Participants (<em>N</em><sub>Total</sub> = 560) learned how (i) trustworthy and (ii) trusting various partners were through repeated trust games. Participants predicted which partners would become friends with one another and which partners they would become friends with themselves if they were to meet in person. Across two studies and both trait measures, we found that participants were significantly more likely to predict that partners who behaved similarly would later become friends compared to those who behaved dissimilarly. Interestingly, we found that participants were significantly more likely to predict that they would become friends with highly trustworthy and highly trusting partners compared to highly untrustworthy or highly untrusting partners, regardless of their own behavioral tendencies or even their own self-perceptions. These findings suggest that for trust-related traits, people assume homophily will govern others' relationships but not necessarily their own. Such expectations likely shape how people approach or foster new friendships for themselves and between others.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104784"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144595723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“I wanna thank me”: Reputational consequences of attribution locus depend on outcome valence “我要感谢我”:归因点的名誉后果取决于结果效价
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104789
Ignazio Ziano , Deming Wang , Ovul Sezer
Five studies (four preregistered; total n = 2948, French and U.S. adult participants) show that the reputational consequences of attributing an outcome to internal or external sources depend on the outcome's valence. Individuals are liked more when they attribute successes to external sources (such as their teammates) and when they attribute failures to internal sources (such as themselves) (Studies 1, 2, and 3). Consequently, participants donate more to others who fit this attribution profile (Study 4). This preference is associated with participants' belief that targets attributing successes internally and failures externally are misrepresenting their contribution to the outcome (Studies 1 and 3). The effect is observed for attributions made both in public and in private but is slightly weaker for those made in private settings (Study 5). We discuss theoretical implications of the results for impression formation and the psychology of perceived contribution, and practical implications for communication in organizational and workplace settings.
5项研究(4项预注册;总n = 2948,法国和美国成年参与者)表明,将结果归因于内部或外部来源的声誉后果取决于结果的效价。当个人将成功归因于外部因素(如他们的队友)和将失败归因于内部因素(如他们自己)时,人们更喜欢他们(研究1、2和3)。因此,参与者向符合这一归因特征的其他人捐赠更多(研究4)。这种偏好与参与者的信念有关,即目标将成功归因于内部和失败归因于外部,歪曲了他们对结果的贡献(研究1和3)。在公共场合和私人场合都观察到这种影响,但在私人场合的影响略弱(研究5)。我们讨论了研究结果对印象形成和感知贡献心理学的理论意义,以及对组织和工作场所环境中沟通的实际意义。
{"title":"“I wanna thank me”: Reputational consequences of attribution locus depend on outcome valence","authors":"Ignazio Ziano ,&nbsp;Deming Wang ,&nbsp;Ovul Sezer","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104789","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104789","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Five studies (four preregistered; total <em>n</em> = 2948, French and U.S. adult participants) show that the reputational consequences of attributing an outcome to internal or external sources depend on the outcome's valence. Individuals are liked more when they attribute successes to external sources (such as their teammates) and when they attribute failures to internal sources (such as themselves) (Studies 1, 2, and 3). Consequently, participants donate more to others who fit this attribution profile (Study 4). This preference is associated with participants' belief that targets attributing successes internally and failures externally are misrepresenting their contribution to the outcome (Studies 1 and 3). The effect is observed for attributions made both in public and in private but is slightly weaker for those made in private settings (Study 5). We discuss theoretical implications of the results for impression formation and the psychology of perceived contribution, and practical implications for communication in organizational and workplace settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104789"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144589141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
I am, I am not: Strategies to cope with negative group labels 我是,我不是:应对消极群体标签的策略
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104790
Gloria Danqiao Cheng , Jennifer Whitson , Cynthia S. Wang
Negative group labels (i.e., slurs) can reinforce stigma and perpetuate oppression of stigmatized groups. This research compares two label-coping strategies that stigmatized group members employ to cope with negative group labels: self-labeling (“I am X”) and label-rejection (“I am not X”). Seven studies demonstrate that self-labeling more effectively reduces outgroup observers' perceptions of a label's negativity compared to label-rejection. However, outgroup observers impose higher social costs on self-labelers (in terms of reduced likability, hireability, and promotability) than label-rejecters. These effects generalize across multiple stigmatized groups and contexts (Studies 1a-d). Moreover, the effect of label-coping strategy on label negativity is mediated by observers' perceptions of the stigmatized group's control over the label (Study 2), while the effect of label-coping strategy on social costs is mediated by observers' experience of symbolic threat (Study 3). Finally, observers who more strongly believe that status differences between groups are justified are more likely to penalize self-labelers vs. label-rejecters due to heightened threat (Study 4).
负面的群体标签(即诽谤)会强化污名化,并使被污名化的群体遭受长期压迫。本研究比较了被污名化的群体成员用来应对消极群体标签的两种标签应对策略:自我标签(“我是X”)和标签拒绝(“我不是X”)。七项研究表明,与拒绝标签相比,自我标签更有效地减少了外群体观察者对标签消极性的看法。然而,与拒绝标签者相比,外群体观察者对自我标签者施加了更高的社会成本(在降低亲和力、可雇佣性和可推广性方面)。这些影响在多个被污名化的群体和环境中普遍存在(研究1a-d)。此外,标签应对策略对标签消极性的影响是由观察者对标签控制的感知介导的(研究2),而标签应对策略对社会成本的影响是由观察者对符号威胁的体验介导的(研究3)。最后,那些更强烈地相信群体之间的地位差异是合理的观察者更有可能惩罚自我贴标签者和标签拒绝者,因为威胁更大(研究4)。
{"title":"I am, I am not: Strategies to cope with negative group labels","authors":"Gloria Danqiao Cheng ,&nbsp;Jennifer Whitson ,&nbsp;Cynthia S. Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104790","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104790","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Negative group labels (i.e., slurs) can reinforce stigma and perpetuate oppression of stigmatized groups. This research compares two label-coping strategies that stigmatized group members employ to cope with negative group labels: <em>self-labeling</em> (“I am X”) and <em>label-rejection</em> (“I am not X”). Seven studies demonstrate that self-labeling more effectively reduces outgroup observers' perceptions of a label's negativity compared to label-rejection. However, outgroup observers impose higher social costs on self-labelers (in terms of reduced likability, hireability, and promotability) than label-rejecters. These effects generalize across multiple stigmatized groups and contexts (Studies 1a-d). Moreover, the effect of label-coping strategy on label negativity is mediated by observers' perceptions of the stigmatized group's control over the label (Study 2), while the effect of label-coping strategy on social costs is mediated by observers' experience of symbolic threat (Study 3). Finally, observers who more strongly believe that status differences between groups are justified are more likely to penalize self-labelers vs. label-rejecters due to heightened threat (Study 4).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104790"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144581242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rethinking rose-tinted glasses: A cognitive-ecological explanation of prospective self-comparisons 重新思考玫瑰色眼镜:前瞻性自我比较的认知生态学解释
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104787
Samantha Zaw, Alex Koch
We examined prospective (i.e., future-oriented) self-comparisons in an ecology with three empirically validated principles of impression formation. First, people can have more negative than positive attributes (diversity). But second, individuals do have more positive than negative attributes (frequency). Third, over time people generally improve by losing negative attributes and gaining positive attributes (growth). Three studies found that present-future similarities were most positive, the present self's unique attributes were most negative, and the future self's unique attributes were in between. In Study 1, this pattern emerged for both self-comparisons and acquaintance-comparisons. In Study 2, it emerged for both prospective and retrospective (i.e., past-oriented) self-comparisons. In Study 3, the pattern vanished when middle-aged people compared their present self to their old age self. Taken together, these findings largely support a realistic view of one's own future. The findings also lend some support for a self-enhancing view of what the future holds.
我们研究了前景(即,面向未来的)自我比较在生态与三个经验验证的原则的印象形成。首先,人们的消极属性可能多于积极属性(多样性)。其次,个人的积极属性多于消极属性(频率)。第三,随着时间的推移,人们通常会通过失去消极属性和获得积极属性(成长)来提高自己。三项研究发现,现在-未来的相似性是最积极的,现在自我的独特属性是最消极的,而未来自我的独特属性介于两者之间。在研究1中,这种模式在自我比较和熟人比较中都出现了。在研究2中,它出现在前瞻性和回顾性(即以过去为导向)自我比较中。在研究3中,当中年人将现在的自己与老年的自己进行比较时,这种模式就消失了。综上所述,这些发现在很大程度上支持了人们对自己未来的现实看法。这些发现也为一种自我增强的未来观点提供了一些支持。
{"title":"Rethinking rose-tinted glasses: A cognitive-ecological explanation of prospective self-comparisons","authors":"Samantha Zaw,&nbsp;Alex Koch","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104787","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104787","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examined prospective (i.e., future-oriented) self-comparisons in an ecology with three empirically validated principles of impression formation. First, people <em>can</em> have more negative than positive attributes (diversity). But second, individuals <em>do</em> have more positive than negative attributes (frequency). Third, over time people generally improve by losing negative attributes and gaining positive attributes (growth). Three studies found that present-future similarities were most positive, the present self's unique attributes were most negative, and the future self's unique attributes were in between. In Study 1, this pattern emerged for both self-comparisons and acquaintance-comparisons. In Study 2, it emerged for both prospective and retrospective (i.e., past-oriented) self-comparisons. In Study 3, the pattern vanished when middle-aged people compared their present self to their old age self. Taken together, these findings largely support a realistic view of one's own future. The findings also lend some support for a self-enhancing view of what the future holds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104787"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144581241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From ostracized to pleased: How fair and unfair social exclusion activates schadenfreude 从排斥到高兴:公平和不公平的社会排斥如何激发幸灾乐祸
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104786
Sarah Mohammadi, Andrew H. Hales
People sometimes derive pleasure from the misfortune of others. Here, we investigate social ostracism as a multifaceted trigger of this complex emotion: schadenfreude. Building on the theories of fairness perception, ostracism, and justice-based schadenfreude, we propose that both experiencing and merely observing ostracism can elicit schadenfreude toward an ostracizer. This response is primarily driven by two factors: (1) the (un)fairness of the ostracism itself and (2) the perceived deservingness of an ostracizer to face negative consequences. Four preregistered experiments support these predictions. People who are ostracized (Study 1; N = 338) experience schadenfreude specifically toward their excluders but not toward uninvolved individuals, indicating that this response is directed rather than generalized. Not just targets but also third-party observers (Study 2; N = 82) report schadenfreude toward the ostracizer. Supporting the justice-based account, among both targets and observers (Study 3; N = 624), ostracism-induced schadenfreude is statistically accounted for by the perceived deservingness of the ostracizer to experience negative outcomes. Finally, providing direct causal evidence, ostracism elicited schadenfreude, but only when experimentally manipulated to be unfair (Study 4; N = 479): excluders who unfairly ostracized well-behaved individuals elicited greater schadenfreude than those who fairly ostracized provocative norm-violators. This indicates the fairness of exclusion influences perceptions of how much an ostracizer deserves misfortune, and thus the subsequent schadenfreude. Together, findings document a previously unexplored consequence of ostracism: the emergence of schadenfreude as a moral emotion in response to unfair exclusion.
人们有时从别人的不幸中获得快乐。在这里,我们调查了社会排斥作为这种复杂情绪的多方面触发因素:幸灾乐祸。在公平感知、排斥和基于正义的幸灾乐祸理论的基础上,我们提出,经历和仅仅观察排斥都会引起对排斥者的幸灾乐祸。这种反应主要是由两个因素驱动的:(1)排斥本身的(不)公平性;(2)被排斥者认为应该面对负面后果。四个预先注册的实验支持这些预测。被排斥的人(研究1;N = 338)会特别对排斥者幸灾乐祸,而不是对不参与的个体幸灾乐祸,这表明这种反应是定向的,而不是泛化的。不仅是目标,还有第三方观察者(研究2;N = 82)报告对被放逐者幸灾乐祸。在目标和观察者之间支持基于正义的账户(研究3;N = 624),从统计上讲,被排斥者对经历负面结果的感知是值得的,这说明了被排斥引起的幸灾乐祸。最后,提供直接的因果证据,排斥引起幸灾乐祸,但只有当实验操纵是不公平的(研究4;N = 479):不公平地排斥行为良好的个体的排斥者比那些公平地排斥挑衅违规者的排斥者更容易幸灾乐祸。这表明,排斥的公平性影响了人们对被排斥者应该遭受多少不幸的看法,从而影响了随后的幸灾乐祸。总之,这些发现记录了一个以前未被探索过的排斥后果:作为对不公平排斥的回应,幸灾乐祸作为一种道德情绪的出现。
{"title":"From ostracized to pleased: How fair and unfair social exclusion activates schadenfreude","authors":"Sarah Mohammadi,&nbsp;Andrew H. Hales","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104786","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104786","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People sometimes derive pleasure from the misfortune of others. Here, we investigate social ostracism as a multifaceted trigger of this complex emotion: <em>schadenfreude.</em> Building on the theories of fairness perception, ostracism, and justice-based schadenfreude, we propose that both experiencing and merely observing ostracism can elicit schadenfreude toward an ostracizer. This response is primarily driven by two factors: (1) the (un)fairness of the ostracism itself and (2) the perceived deservingness of an ostracizer to face negative consequences. Four preregistered experiments support these predictions. People who are ostracized (Study 1; <em>N</em> = 338) experience schadenfreude specifically toward their excluders but not toward uninvolved individuals, indicating that this response is directed rather than generalized. Not just targets but also third-party observers (Study 2; <em>N</em> = 82) report schadenfreude toward the ostracizer. Supporting the justice-based account, among both targets and observers (Study 3; <em>N</em> = 624), ostracism-induced schadenfreude is statistically accounted for by the perceived <em>deservingness</em> of the ostracizer to experience negative outcomes. Finally, providing direct causal evidence, ostracism elicited schadenfreude, but only when experimentally manipulated to be unfair (Study 4; <em>N</em> = 479): excluders who unfairly ostracized well-behaved individuals elicited greater schadenfreude than those who fairly ostracized provocative norm-violators. This indicates the fairness of exclusion influences perceptions of how much an ostracizer deserves misfortune, and thus the subsequent schadenfreude. Together, findings document a previously unexplored consequence of ostracism: the emergence of schadenfreude as a moral emotion in response to unfair exclusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144563103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vicarious kin derogation—when and why people mock the innocent family members of political leaders 代亲属贬损——人们何时以及为何嘲笑政治领导人的无辜家庭成员
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-06-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104781
Simone Tang , Kurt Gray
Despite the widespread human aversion to harming the innocent, people often mock or attack the children and spouses of public figures they dislike, a pattern we call vicarious kin derogation (VKD). Targeting the vulnerable kin of powerful figures has been used to inflict psychological pain, from ancient China to modern-day North Korea, to social media in the West. Six studies explore VKD with both experimental and field data. Across 562,066 tweets directed at US presidential candidates, people derogate politicians' loved ones when those loved ones seem more emotionally vulnerable than the candidate themselves (Study 1). In experiments, people engage in VKD when a politician seems more emotionally affected by attacks on family than on himself (Studies 2 and 4), and when people are motivated to inflict suffering on the public figure (Study 5). At the same time, people are less likely to endorse VKD when reminded that it targets innocent individuals (Studies 3 and 5). Together, these studies reveal a central psychological tension: VKD is satisfying when it seems to hurt an otherwise invulnerable leader, but people still dislike harming the innocent. This dynamic helps explain a persistent, toxic feature of modern political discourse: when people seek to harm public figures by attacking their loved ones.
尽管人类普遍厌恶伤害无辜者,但人们经常嘲笑或攻击他们不喜欢的公众人物的子女和配偶,这种模式我们称之为代亲属贬损(VKD)。从古代中国到现代朝鲜,再到西方的社交媒体,针对权势人物的弱势亲属一直被用来施加心理痛苦。六项研究通过实验和现场数据探讨了VKD。在针对美国总统候选人的562066条推文中,人们贬低政治家的亲人,因为这些亲人在情感上似乎比候选人自己更脆弱(研究1)。在实验中,当一个政治家似乎更容易受到对家庭的攻击而不是对自己的攻击时(研究2和4),以及当人们有动机让公众人物遭受痛苦时(研究5),人们就会参与VKD。与此同时,当人们被提醒它针对的是无辜的人时,他们就不太可能支持VKD(研究3和5)。总之,这些研究揭示了一个核心的心理紧张:当VKD似乎伤害了一个本来无懈可击的领导者时,人们会感到满意,但人们仍然不喜欢伤害无辜的人。这种动态有助于解释现代政治话语中一个持久的、有害的特征:人们试图通过攻击公众人物的亲人来伤害他们。
{"title":"Vicarious kin derogation—when and why people mock the innocent family members of political leaders","authors":"Simone Tang ,&nbsp;Kurt Gray","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104781","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104781","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the widespread human aversion to harming the innocent, people often mock or attack the children and spouses of public figures they dislike, a pattern we call vicarious kin derogation (VKD). Targeting the vulnerable kin of powerful figures has been used to inflict psychological pain, from ancient China to modern-day North Korea, to social media in the West. Six studies explore VKD with both experimental and field data. Across 562,066 tweets directed at US presidential candidates, people derogate politicians' loved ones when those loved ones seem more emotionally vulnerable than the candidate themselves (Study 1). In experiments, people engage in VKD when a politician seems more emotionally affected by attacks on family than on himself (Studies 2 and 4), and when people are motivated to inflict suffering on the public figure (Study 5). At the same time, people are less likely to endorse VKD when reminded that it targets innocent individuals (Studies 3 and 5). Together, these studies reveal a central psychological tension: VKD is satisfying when it seems to hurt an otherwise invulnerable leader, but people still dislike harming the innocent. This dynamic helps explain a persistent, toxic feature of modern political discourse: when people seek to harm public figures by attacking their loved ones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144481071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Organizational norms and gender identity contexts shape when pronoun-sharing is perceived as disingenuous allyship: Evidence of a normative eclipsing effect 当代词共享被认为是虚伪的盟友关系时,组织规范和性别认同语境就会形成:规范黯然效应的证据
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-06-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104782
Izilda Pereira-Jorge, Kimberly E. Chaney, Flora Blanchette, Alexandra Garr-Schultz
Pronoun-sharing is regarded as an inclusive practice targeted toward gender minorities. Though individual employees sharing pronouns results in the organization's higher-level management being perceived as more likely to engage in LGBT+ allyship, the impact of pronoun-sharing social norms on perceptions of individuals and companies remains unexplored. Across four experiments (N = 1365), we examined how perceived norms and employee gender identity impact when pronoun-sharing practices shift perceptions of both the target employee and the organization. When all cisgender employee team members shared pronouns, both cisgender (Studies 1, 3–4) and gender minority participants (Study 2) perceived an employee's pronoun-sharing as more externally motivated and the employee as less likely to display LGBT+ allyship compared to when pronoun-sharing was not the organizational norm. Further, we document a normative eclipsing effect, where lower-level employees who engage in pronoun-sharing norms (relative to sharing without a norm) are perceived as having management who are more likely to engage in LGBT+ allyship and are met with greater procedural fairness expectations (Study 2–3). Results suggest that normative pronoun-sharing may boost favorable perceptions of organizations but not individual employees. Yet, when evidence-based cues of inclusion are present, such as the presence of nonbinary employees (Study 3–4), both employees and management who engage in pronoun sharing are viewed as more likely to engage in LGBT+ allyship, regardless of the pronoun-sharing norm. These findings demonstrate the need to consider how context norms of identity-safety cues impact their utility to promote perceptions of allyship of individual actors and organizations.
代词共享被认为是一种针对少数性别群体的包容性实践。虽然共用代词的员工会让组织的高层管理人员认为他们更有可能参与LGBT+联盟,但共用代词的社会规范对个人和公司观念的影响仍未得到研究。通过四个实验(N = 1365),我们研究了当代词共享实践改变目标员工和组织的看法时,感知规范和员工性别认同是如何影响的。当所有顺性员工团队成员共享代词时,顺性员工(研究1、3-4)和少数性别参与者(研究2)都认为员工的代词共享更有外部动机,与非组织规范的代词共享相比,员工更不可能表现出LGBT+盟友关系。此外,我们还记录了一种规范的遮蔽效应,即参与代词共享规范(相对于没有规范的共享)的低级别员工被认为拥有更有可能参与LGBT+盟友关系的管理层,并且被满足了更高的程序公平期望(研究2-3)。结果表明,规范的代词共享可能会促进组织的好感,而不是员工个人的好感。然而,当存在基于证据的包容线索时,例如非双性恋员工的存在(研究3-4),参与代词共享的员工和管理层都被认为更有可能参与LGBT+联盟,而不管代词共享规范如何。这些发现表明,需要考虑身份安全线索的背景规范如何影响其效用,以促进个体行为者和组织对盟友关系的看法。
{"title":"Organizational norms and gender identity contexts shape when pronoun-sharing is perceived as disingenuous allyship: Evidence of a normative eclipsing effect","authors":"Izilda Pereira-Jorge,&nbsp;Kimberly E. Chaney,&nbsp;Flora Blanchette,&nbsp;Alexandra Garr-Schultz","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104782","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104782","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pronoun-sharing is regarded as an inclusive practice targeted toward gender minorities. Though individual employees sharing pronouns results in the organization's higher-level management being perceived as more likely to engage in LGBT+ allyship, the impact of pronoun-sharing social norms on perceptions of individuals and companies remains unexplored. Across four experiments (<em>N</em> = 1365), we examined how perceived norms and employee gender identity impact when pronoun-sharing practices shift perceptions of both the target employee and the organization. When all cisgender employee team members shared pronouns, both cisgender (Studies 1, 3–4) and gender minority participants (Study 2) perceived an employee's pronoun-sharing as more externally motivated and the employee as less likely to display LGBT+ allyship compared to when pronoun-sharing was not the organizational norm. Further, we document a <em>normative eclipsing effect</em>, where lower-level employees who engage in pronoun-sharing norms (relative to sharing without a norm) are perceived as having management who are more likely to engage in LGBT+ allyship and are met with greater procedural fairness expectations (Study 2–3). Results suggest that normative pronoun-sharing may boost favorable perceptions of organizations but not individual employees. Yet, when evidence-based cues of inclusion are present, such as the presence of nonbinary employees (Study 3–4), both employees and management who engage in pronoun sharing are viewed as more likely to engage in LGBT+ allyship, regardless of the pronoun-sharing norm. These findings demonstrate the need to consider how context norms of identity-safety cues impact their utility to promote perceptions of allyship of individual actors and organizations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104782"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144321960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
People overshoot when choosing resource pools 人们在选择资源池时过度了
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104775
Christopher K. Hsee , Xilin Li , Ying Zeng
This paper studies a pool-choice dilemma, in which two or more resource-seekers decide independently whether to seek resources from a larger pool or a smaller pool. This dilemma mimics many real-life problems, such as firms or vendors deciding whether to enter a market with more potential buyers or one with fewer potential buyers. Across ten studies (five are incentive-compatible), we document a systematic overshooting bias, whereby the resource-seekers in the pool-choice dilemma are more likely to choose the large pool than normatively warranted, thereby sacrificing their own earnings. This research is a major extension of the prior work by Hsee et al. (2021) who found an opposite, undershooting effect in a similar dilemma. The current work offers a new look at the dilemma, with a more comprehensive theory that not only explains the overshooting effect found in this research, but also identifies its moderators and reconciles the opposite findings between this and the prior work. Contrary to what the prior work found, we predict and find that people in the dilemma generally overshoot rather than undershoot, unless they are explicitly prompted to predict the choice of their counterparts or the dilemma is framed in such a way that naturally prompts the players to consider the choice of their counterparts. This research carries theoretical implications for strategic thinking, and practical implications for resource competition.
本文研究了一个资源池选择困境,即两个或两个以上的资源寻求者独立决定从一个较大的资源池还是从一个较小的资源池中寻求资源。这种困境模仿了许多现实生活中的问题,比如公司或供应商决定是进入一个潜在买家更多还是潜在买家更少的市场。在十项研究中(其中五项是激励相容的),我们记录了一种系统性的超调偏差,即资源选择困境中的资源寻求者更有可能选择比规范保证的更大的资源池,从而牺牲自己的收入。这项研究是对Hsee等人(2021)先前工作的主要延伸,他们在类似的困境中发现了相反的、未达到目标的效应。目前的工作提供了一个新的视角来看待这个困境,用一个更全面的理论,不仅解释了本研究中发现的超调效应,而且还确定了它的调节因子,并调和了本研究与先前工作之间的相反发现。与之前的研究结果相反,我们预测并发现,处于困境中的人们通常会超调而不是过调,除非他们被明确提示预测对手的选择,或者困境的框架是这样一种方式,自然地促使参与者考虑对手的选择。本研究对战略思考具有理论意义,对资源竞争具有实践意义。
{"title":"People overshoot when choosing resource pools","authors":"Christopher K. Hsee ,&nbsp;Xilin Li ,&nbsp;Ying Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104775","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104775","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper studies a pool-choice dilemma, in which two or more resource-seekers decide independently whether to seek resources from a larger pool or a smaller pool. This dilemma mimics many real-life problems, such as firms or vendors deciding whether to enter a market with more potential buyers or one with fewer potential buyers. Across ten studies (five are incentive-compatible), we document a systematic <em>overshooting bias</em>, whereby the resource-seekers in the pool-choice dilemma are more likely to choose the large pool than normatively warranted, thereby sacrificing their own earnings. This research is a major extension of the prior work by Hsee et al. (2021) who found an opposite, undershooting effect in a similar dilemma. The current work offers a new look at the dilemma, with a more comprehensive theory that not only explains the overshooting effect found in this research, but also identifies its moderators and reconciles the opposite findings between this and the prior work. Contrary to what the prior work found, we predict and find that people in the dilemma generally overshoot rather than undershoot, unless they are explicitly prompted to predict the choice of their counterparts or the dilemma is framed in such a way that naturally prompts the players to consider the choice of their counterparts. This research carries theoretical implications for strategic thinking, and practical implications for resource competition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144314494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The malleability of reliance on race or ethnic vs. gender stereotypes in implicit person perception in the presence of counterstereotypic individuating information: A registered report 在反刻板印象个性化信息存在下,内隐人知觉中种族或民族刻板印象与性别刻板印象依赖的延展性:一份注册报告
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104779
Rachel S. Rubinstein , Lee Jussim
The proposed studies will test two competing hypotheses and one additional hypothesis. The first hypothesis is that reliance on ethnic or race stereotypes in implicit person perception is more malleable than reliance on gender stereotypes in implicit person perception in response to counterstereotypic individuating information. The competing hypothesis is that reliance on ethnic or race and gender stereotypes in implicit person perception are equally malleable in response to such information. An additional hypothesis is that reliance on weaker stereotypes in implicit person perception is more malleable than reliance on stronger stereotypes in response to counterstereotypic individuating information. Studies 1 and 2 will test the competing hypotheses using the same stereotyped attributes as they apply to both gender and racial or ethnic groups to maximize experimental control and will utilize race or ethnic stereotypes that are stronger than gender stereotypes, unlike previous research. Study 3 will fully cross the strength of the stereotype with the type of stereotyped group (gender vs. ethnic) to test the stereotype strength hypothesis and thus rule out alternative explanations for the results. To maximize generalizability, Study 4 will comprise an aggregation of 14 studies that are capable of testing the competing hypotheses: Studies 1–3 in the present research, and 11 previous studies that used the present research design. Regardless of which hypotheses are supported, the present research will contribute to a growing body of knowledge about the circumstances under which implicit associations prevail vs. can be shifted by valid, relevant information in the social environment.
拟议的研究将检验两个相互竞争的假设和一个额外的假设。第一个假设是,在反刻板印象的个性化信息下,内隐人知觉中对民族或种族刻板印象的依赖比内隐人知觉中对性别刻板印象的依赖更具可塑性。另一种与之相竞争的假设是,内隐人感知中对民族或种族和性别刻板印象的依赖,在对这些信息的反应中同样具有可塑性。另一个假设是,内隐人知觉中对较弱刻板印象的依赖比对反刻板印象个性化信息的依赖更具可塑性。研究1和研究2将使用同样的刻板印象属性来测试相互竞争的假设,因为它们适用于性别和种族或民族群体,以最大限度地提高实验控制,并将利用比性别刻板印象更强的种族或民族刻板印象,这与之前的研究不同。研究3将刻板印象的强度与刻板印象的群体类型(性别与种族)完全交叉,以检验刻板印象强度假设,从而排除对结果的其他解释。为了最大限度地推广,研究4将包括14项能够检验相互竞争的假设的研究的集合:本研究中的研究1-3,以及先前使用本研究设计的11项研究。无论哪一种假设得到支持,目前的研究都将有助于建立一个不断增长的知识体系,即在何种情况下,内隐联想会盛行,而内隐联想会被社会环境中有效的、相关的信息所改变。
{"title":"The malleability of reliance on race or ethnic vs. gender stereotypes in implicit person perception in the presence of counterstereotypic individuating information: A registered report","authors":"Rachel S. Rubinstein ,&nbsp;Lee Jussim","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104779","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104779","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The proposed studies will test two competing hypotheses and one additional hypothesis. The first hypothesis is that reliance on ethnic or race stereotypes in implicit person perception is more malleable than reliance on gender stereotypes in implicit person perception in response to counterstereotypic individuating information. The competing hypothesis is that reliance on ethnic or race and gender stereotypes in implicit person perception are equally malleable in response to such information. An additional hypothesis is that reliance on weaker stereotypes in implicit person perception is more malleable than reliance on stronger stereotypes in response to counterstereotypic individuating information. Studies 1 and 2 will test the competing hypotheses using the same stereotyped attributes as they apply to both gender and racial or ethnic groups to maximize experimental control and will utilize race or ethnic stereotypes that are stronger than gender stereotypes, unlike previous research. Study 3 will fully cross the strength of the stereotype with the type of stereotyped group (gender vs. ethnic) to test the stereotype strength hypothesis and thus rule out alternative explanations for the results. To maximize generalizability, Study 4 will comprise an aggregation of 14 studies that are capable of testing the competing hypotheses: Studies 1–3 in the present research, and 11 previous studies that used the present research design. Regardless of which hypotheses are supported, the present research will contribute to a growing body of knowledge about the circumstances under which implicit associations prevail vs. can be shifted by valid, relevant information in the social environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104779"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144290574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Revisiting the effect of discrepant perceptual fluency on truth judgments 重新审视不同知觉流畅性对真相判断的影响
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2025-06-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104774
Semih C. Aktepe, Daniel W. Heck
Fluency theories assume that perceived truth is influenced by the subjective ease with which presented information is processed. Several studies have demonstrated that increased perceptual fluency, induced by high versus low color contrast of presented statements, results in higher truth judgments. According to the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis, the unexpected switch from several low-fluency stimuli to a high-fluency stimulus is assumed to enhance perceived truthfulness. In two online studies (one preregistered), we aimed to conceptually replicate the central finding by Hansen, Dechêne, and Wänke (2008; Journal of Experimental Social Psychology) that discrepancies in color contrast influence truth judgments. Besides adding a color calibration phase in one condition, we extended the original design by varying the length of stimulus blocks presented in low or high color contrast. Contrary to previous findings, neither the level of perceptual fluency nor unexpected discrepancies in fluency affected truth judgments. Still, high-contrast statements were read faster than low-contrast ones, indicating that processing fluency was successfully manipulated. A meta-analysis combining our two experiments with published studies shows that the effect of color contrast on truth judgments may not be as robust as previously thought.
流畅性理论认为,感知到的真相受到处理呈现信息的主观容易程度的影响。几项研究表明,由呈现的陈述的颜色对比高低引起的感知流畅性的提高,会导致更高的真相判断。根据差异归因假设,从几个低流畅性刺激到一个高流畅性刺激的意外转换被假设为增强感知真实性。在两项在线研究中(其中一项是预先注册的),我们旨在从概念上复制Hansen, Dechêne和Wänke (2008;实验社会心理学杂志),颜色对比的差异影响真相判断。除了在一种情况下增加颜色校准阶段外,我们还通过改变在低或高颜色对比度下呈现的刺激块的长度来扩展原始设计。与之前的研究结果相反,感知流利程度和意外流利程度的差异都不会影响真相判断。然而,高对比度语句的阅读速度比低对比度语句快,这表明处理流畅性被成功地操纵了。将我们的两个实验与已发表的研究相结合的荟萃分析表明,颜色对比对真相判断的影响可能不像之前认为的那样强大。
{"title":"Revisiting the effect of discrepant perceptual fluency on truth judgments","authors":"Semih C. Aktepe,&nbsp;Daniel W. Heck","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104774","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104774","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fluency theories assume that perceived truth is influenced by the subjective ease with which presented information is processed. Several studies have demonstrated that increased perceptual fluency, induced by high versus low color contrast of presented statements, results in higher truth judgments. According to the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis, the unexpected switch from several low-fluency stimuli to a high-fluency stimulus is assumed to enhance perceived truthfulness. In two online studies (one preregistered), we aimed to conceptually replicate the central finding by Hansen, Dechêne, and Wänke (2008; <em>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology</em>) that discrepancies in color contrast influence truth judgments. Besides adding a color calibration phase in one condition, we extended the original design by varying the length of stimulus blocks presented in low or high color contrast. Contrary to previous findings, neither the level of perceptual fluency nor unexpected discrepancies in fluency affected truth judgments. Still, high-contrast statements were read faster than low-contrast ones, indicating that processing fluency was successfully manipulated. A meta-analysis combining our two experiments with published studies shows that the effect of color contrast on truth judgments may not be as robust as previously thought.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 104774"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144271345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1