As Intelligent Decision Support Systems (IDSS) become increasingly used in the workplace to aid decision-making, employees are prompted to view them as social actors. This human-AI collaboration, however, can lead to a reduction in individual effort. This behavior reflects social loafing, a psychological tendency that can reduce collaborative outcomes and performance. Despite its importance, the underlying antecedents and mechanisms of social loafing in the context of human-AI collaboration remain largely unexplored. Drawing on Affordance Theory and Moral Disengagement Theory (MDT), this study aims to investigate how perceived technology affordance and moral disengagement influence employees' social loafing when collaborating with IDSS. Analysis of survey data from 312 employees of Human Resources (HR) departments in Mainland China indicated that: (1) perceived autonomy, perceived lack of emotion, and perceived lack of achievement visibility positively impact moral disengagement; (2) perceived customizability negatively impacts moral disengagement; (3) moral disengagement positively influences social loafing; and (4) the individual characteristics of AI experience and work experience moderate the relationships between technology affordances and moral disengagement. Theoretically, these findings contribute to the understanding of the antecedents and mechanisms of social loafing in human-AI collaboration. Practically, the study provides guidance for organizational governance and IDSS design strategies aiming to reduce social loafing.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
