Pub Date : 2024-04-14DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107189
Jing Wang , Liying Wang
We show that syndicated loan spreads are lower as borrowers’ shareholders cross-hold more lenders’ equity. Apart from controlling for borrower and lender fixed effects and various other ownership measures, we address endogeneity concerns by conducting a difference-in-differences analysis exploiting the mergers of institutional investors. Additional tests on cross-holding shareholders’ holding period, the impact of active cross-holders, subsamples of borrowers subject to different degrees of shareholder–creditor conflicts, changes in borrower risk around loan initiation, and the number of financial covenants provide support for the hypothesis that borrower shareholders’ equity holdings of lenders reduce agency costs of debt.
{"title":"When shareholders cross-hold lenders’ equity: The effects on the costs of bank loans","authors":"Jing Wang , Liying Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107189","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We show that syndicated loan spreads are lower as borrowers’ shareholders cross-hold more lenders’ equity. Apart from controlling for borrower and lender fixed effects and various other ownership measures, we address endogeneity concerns by conducting a difference-in-differences analysis exploiting the mergers of institutional investors. Additional tests on cross-holding shareholders’ holding period, the impact of active cross-holders, subsamples of borrowers subject to different degrees of shareholder–creditor conflicts, changes in borrower risk around loan initiation, and the number of financial covenants provide support for the hypothesis that borrower shareholders’ equity holdings of lenders reduce agency costs of debt.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140646385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-09DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107183
Zeynep Önder , Süheyla Özyıldırım
We examine the real effects of credit supply volatility in emerging economies. In countries with highly effective governments, government-owned banks play a significant role in reducing the effect of credit supply volatility on macroeconomic volatility. Conversely, foreign banks do not significantly change this effect. Furthermore, the presence of government-owned banks as development banks plays a positive role in stabilizing the economy during a sovereign or currency crisis. In countries where foreign banks dominate the banking sector, these banks amplify the adverse effect of a volatile credit supply on the volatilities in output, consumption, and investment growth rates, especially during a banking crisis.
{"title":"Bank ownership, credit supply volatility, and macroeconomic volatility","authors":"Zeynep Önder , Süheyla Özyıldırım","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107183","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine the real effects of credit supply volatility in emerging economies. In countries with highly effective governments, government-owned banks play a significant role in reducing the effect of credit supply volatility on macroeconomic volatility. Conversely, foreign banks do not significantly change this effect. Furthermore, the presence of government-owned banks as development banks plays a positive role in stabilizing the economy during a sovereign or currency crisis. In countries where foreign banks dominate the banking sector, these banks amplify the adverse effect of a volatile credit supply on the volatilities in output, consumption, and investment growth rates, especially during a banking crisis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140639066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107169
Andrej Gill , David Heller
This paper examines the role of intellectual property (IP) law as a determinant for external debt financing of innovative firms. For identification, we exploit exogenous variation in patent right enforcement arising from the 2004 EU Enforcement Directive. This major policy reform strengthened IP rights and, thus, raised patent owners' asset position. We find that patenting firms significantly increase their use of debt and benefit from lower interest rates in response to the amendment, especially if they own valuable patent portfolios. These effects are most pronounced for relatively small and financially constrained firms, emphasizing the importance of the legal framework in fostering debt financing activities of innovation-oriented firms.
{"title":"Leveraging intellectual property: The value of harmonized enforcement regimes","authors":"Andrej Gill , David Heller","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107169","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the role of intellectual property (IP) law as a determinant for external debt financing of innovative firms. For identification, we exploit exogenous variation in patent right enforcement arising from the 2004 EU Enforcement Directive. This major policy reform strengthened IP rights and, thus, raised patent owners' asset position. We find that patenting firms significantly increase their use of debt and benefit from lower interest rates in response to the amendment, especially if they own valuable patent portfolios. These effects are most pronounced for relatively small and financially constrained firms, emphasizing the importance of the legal framework in fostering debt financing activities of innovation-oriented firms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624000864/pdfft?md5=555bdc8e5381437456300c32bd517b49&pid=1-s2.0-S0378426624000864-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140546016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-05DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107170
Mingzhi Hu , Zhenguo Lin , Yingchun Liu
This paper examines the effect of financial literacy on mortgage stress. Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we find that borrowers with high levels of financial literacy are over 60 percent less likely to suffer from mortgage stress than borrowers with low levels of financial literacy after controlling for observables. Our findings remain robust to various potential issues, including sample selection bias and functional misspecifications. Moreover, we find that the effect of financial literacy varies across different age groups of borrowers. Further analysis reveals strong cross effects of financial literacy and quantitative reasoning on mortgage stress.
{"title":"Financial literacy and mortgage stress","authors":"Mingzhi Hu , Zhenguo Lin , Yingchun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107170","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the effect of financial literacy on mortgage stress. Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we find that borrowers with high levels of financial literacy are over 60 percent less likely to suffer from mortgage stress than borrowers with low levels of financial literacy after controlling for observables. Our findings remain robust to various potential issues, including sample selection bias and functional misspecifications. Moreover, we find that the effect of financial literacy varies across different age groups of borrowers. Further analysis reveals strong cross effects of financial literacy and quantitative reasoning on mortgage stress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140546015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-04DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107167
Massimo Filippini , Markus Leippold , Tobias Wekhof
In this paper, we survey a large sample of Swiss households to measure sustainable finance literacy, which we define as the knowledge and skill of identifying and assessing financial products according to their reported sustainability-related characteristics. To this end, we use multiple-choice questions. Furthermore, we measure Swiss private investors' level of awareness about sustainable financial products using open-ended questions. We find that Swiss households, which are generally highly financially literate by international standards, exhibit low levels of sustainable financial literacy compared to the current working definitions of sustainable finance. Moreover, despite its low level, knowledge about sustainable finance is a significant factor in the reported ownership of sustainable products. The empirical results also show a relatively low level of awareness. Generally, these empirical findings suggest a need to create transparent regulatory standards and strengthen information campaigns about sustainable financial products.
{"title":"Sustainable finance literacy and the determinants of sustainable investing","authors":"Massimo Filippini , Markus Leippold , Tobias Wekhof","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107167","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we survey a large sample of Swiss households to measure sustainable finance literacy, which we define as the knowledge and skill of identifying and assessing financial products according to their reported sustainability-related characteristics. To this end, we use multiple-choice questions. Furthermore, we measure Swiss private investors' level of awareness about sustainable financial products using open-ended questions. We find that Swiss households, which are generally highly financially literate by international standards, exhibit low levels of sustainable financial literacy compared to the current working definitions of sustainable finance. Moreover, despite its low level, knowledge about sustainable finance is a significant factor in the reported ownership of sustainable products. The empirical results also show a relatively low level of awareness. Generally, these empirical findings suggest a need to create transparent regulatory standards and strengthen information campaigns about sustainable financial products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624000852/pdfft?md5=6d09f6ba150931cdcf8ba650e2bf6f81&pid=1-s2.0-S0378426624000852-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140539777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-02DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107171
Nadia Massoud, Keke Song, Nam Tran
We employ textual analysis to identify mergers and acquisitions (M&As) financed by corporate loans and show that acquirer announcement returns are higher in loan-financed M&As. Utilizing an instrumental variable approach and a quasi-natural experiment, we provide evidence that lenders contribute to the higher acquirer returns in loan-financed M&As. Our findings support the view that lenders differ in their ability to screen and monitor borrowers and that their ability is persistent. We also find evidence that lenders’ participation in the M&A market can resolve uncertainty about M&A deal quality, improve corporate governance by preventing value-destroying M&As, and provide long-term monitoring benefits to acquirer shareholders.
{"title":"Lender effects on gains from mergers and acquisitions","authors":"Nadia Massoud, Keke Song, Nam Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107171","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We employ textual analysis to identify mergers and acquisitions (M&As) financed by corporate loans and show that acquirer announcement returns are higher in loan-financed M&As. Utilizing an instrumental variable approach and a quasi-natural experiment, we provide evidence that lenders contribute to the higher acquirer returns in loan-financed M&As. Our findings support the view that lenders differ in their ability to screen and monitor borrowers and that their ability is persistent. We also find evidence that lenders’ participation in the M&A market can resolve uncertainty about M&A deal quality, improve corporate governance by preventing value-destroying M&As, and provide long-term monitoring benefits to acquirer shareholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624000888/pdfft?md5=4b7d47f08a5f6e418e638d6b862ec6e0&pid=1-s2.0-S0378426624000888-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140552559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107172
Joye Khoo , Chen Zheng , Shams Pathan
We argue a positive association between common ownership and liquidity creation because common ownership increases risk-absorption capacity through higher profit margins, greater equity capital, and improved disclosure quality. Accordingly, we find solid evidence that banks with greater common ownership create 3.56%–4.54% more liquidity. The beneficial effect on liquidity creation is dominant for banks with high risk-absorption capacities, enhanced disclosure quality, low competition, greater long-term shareholdings, and low performance-sensitive managerial incentives, substantiating our theoretical conjectures and establishing five significant channels. Finally, we show that banks have incentive to create more liquidity when they have significant co-ownerships among themselves. Our main findings remain robust to multiple proxies, alternative specifications, and three methods to address endogeneity concerns – difference-in-differences based on the Blackrock–Barclays Global Investors merger in 2009, two-stage least squares analysis with instrumental variables based on Russell 2000 index inclusion, and propensity score matching.
我们认为,共同所有权与流动性创造之间存在正相关关系,因为共同所有权可通过提高利润率、增加权益资本和改善信息披露质量来提高风险吸收能力。因此,我们发现确凿证据表明,共同所有权越强的银行创造的流动性越多,占比为 3.56%-4.54%。对流动性创造的有利影响主要体现在风险吸收能力强、信息披露质量提高、竞争程度低、长期持股比例高以及对业绩敏感的管理者激励低的银行上,这证实了我们的理论猜想,并建立了五个重要渠道。最后,我们表明,当银行之间拥有大量共同所有权时,银行就有动力创造更多的流动性。我们的主要研究结果在使用多种代用指标、替代规格以及三种解决内生性问题的方法(基于 2009 年 Blackrock-Barclays Global Investors 合并的差分法、基于罗素 2000 指数纳入工具变量的两阶段最小二乘法分析以及倾向得分匹配法)后仍然是稳健的。
{"title":"The beneficial effect of common ownership: Evidence from bank liquidity creation","authors":"Joye Khoo , Chen Zheng , Shams Pathan","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107172","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107172","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We argue a positive association between common ownership and liquidity creation because common ownership increases risk-absorption capacity through higher profit margins, greater equity capital, and improved disclosure quality. Accordingly, we find solid evidence that banks with greater common ownership create 3.56%–4.54% more liquidity. The beneficial effect on liquidity creation is dominant for banks with high risk-absorption capacities, enhanced disclosure quality, low competition, greater long-term shareholdings, and low performance-sensitive managerial incentives, substantiating our theoretical conjectures and establishing five significant channels. Finally, we show that banks have incentive to create more liquidity when they have significant co-ownerships among themselves. Our main findings remain robust to multiple proxies, alternative specifications, and three methods to address endogeneity concerns – difference-in-differences based on the Blackrock–Barclays Global Investors merger in 2009, two-stage least squares analysis with instrumental variables based on Russell 2000 index inclusion, and propensity score matching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140767540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-30DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107163
Christopher W. Anderson , M. Babajide Wintoki , Yaoyi Xi
We find that firms with CFOs who have extensive social connections within the finance industry hold less precautionary cash. CFO connections matter more than CEO connections, reflecting the preeminence of CFOs among C-level executives in cash management and negotiating access to corporate finance. Firms reduce the proportion of assets held in cash by seven percentage points in the two years following CFO turnover and the appointment of a CFO with finance industry connections. The stock market valuation of incremental cash holdings of firms with well-connected CFOs is lower than for other firms, consistent with investor recognition of CFO social capital as an alternative means to address constraints on external capital.
我们发现,拥有在金融业拥有广泛社会关系的首席财务官的公司持有的预防性现金较少。首席财务官的人脉比首席执行官的人脉更重要,这反映了首席财务官在现金管理和企业融资谈判方面在 C 级高管中的优势。在首席财务官更替和任命与金融业有联系的首席财务官后的两年内,企业将现金资产比例降低了 7 个百分点。与其他公司相比,拥有关系良好的首席财务官的公司增持现金的股市估值较低,这与投资者认可首席财务官社会资本作为解决外部资本限制的替代手段是一致的。
{"title":"CFO social capital, liquidity management, and the market value of cash✰","authors":"Christopher W. Anderson , M. Babajide Wintoki , Yaoyi Xi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107163","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107163","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We find that firms with CFOs who have extensive social connections within the finance industry hold less precautionary cash. CFO connections matter more than CEO connections, reflecting the preeminence of CFOs among C-level executives in cash management and negotiating access to corporate finance. Firms reduce the proportion of assets held in cash by seven percentage points in the two years following CFO turnover and the appointment of a CFO with finance industry connections. The stock market valuation of incremental cash holdings of firms with well-connected CFOs is lower than for other firms, consistent with investor recognition of CFO social capital as an alternative means to address constraints on external capital.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624000815/pdfft?md5=975c7ff82d168538e6dcda9c9ef6587c&pid=1-s2.0-S0378426624000815-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140400261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-30DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107168
Taufique Samdani
This study examines the impact of controlling shareholders’ ownership on trading activity under regimes with different disclosure rules. In regimes with ambiguous disclosure rules, trading volume and turnover are higher when controlling shareholders’ ownership is low and their control rights potentially exceed their cash flow rights. However, this impact diminishes in regimes with strict and unambiguous disclosure rules. These findings are robust to endogeneity concerns, suggesting that investor beliefs about potential agency conflicts are less heterogeneous, as evidenced by their trading behavior when disclosure rules are stringent and well defined. The results highlight the role of disclosure credibility and readability in influencing trading activity, offering new insights into the relationship between ownership structure and market behavior.
{"title":"Disclosure rules, controlling shareholders, and trading activity in the new issues market","authors":"Taufique Samdani","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107168","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the impact of controlling shareholders’ ownership on trading activity under regimes with different disclosure rules. In regimes with ambiguous disclosure rules, trading volume and turnover are higher when controlling shareholders’ ownership is low and their control rights potentially exceed their cash flow rights. However, this impact diminishes in regimes with strict and unambiguous disclosure rules. These findings are robust to endogeneity concerns, suggesting that investor beliefs about potential agency conflicts are less heterogeneous, as evidenced by their trading behavior when disclosure rules are stringent and well defined. The results highlight the role of disclosure credibility and readability in influencing trading activity, offering new insights into the relationship between ownership structure and market behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 107168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140350625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-27DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107166
Emilios Galariotis , Joëlle Miffre , Benoît Sévi
{"title":"Editorial for the special issue of the journal of banking & finance on asset pricing and factor investing","authors":"Emilios Galariotis , Joëlle Miffre , Benoît Sévi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107166","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140331058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}